Research article Special Issues

Existence and uniqueness theorems for pointwise-slant immersions in Sasakian space forms

  • In this paper we derive the Existence and Uniqueness Theorems for pointwise slant immersions in Sasakian space forms which extend the Existence and Uniqueness Theorems for slant immersions in Sasakian space forms proved by Cabreizo et al in 2001.

    Citation: Noura Alhouiti. Existence and uniqueness theorems for pointwise-slant immersions in Sasakian space forms[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17470-17483. doi: 10.3934/math.2023892

    Related Papers:

    [1] Noura Alhouiti . Theorems of existence and uniqueness for pointwise-slant immersions in Kenmotsu space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17489-17503. doi: 10.3934/math.2024850
    [2] Meraj Ali Khan, Ali H. Alkhaldi, Mohd. Aquib . Estimation of eigenvalues for the α-Laplace operator on pseudo-slant submanifolds of generalized Sasakian space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16054-16066. doi: 10.3934/math.2022879
    [3] Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Meraj Ali Khan . Ricci curvature of contact CR-warped product submanifolds in generalized Sasakian space forms admitting nearly Sasakian structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2132-2151. doi: 10.3934/math.2021130
    [4] Ali H. Alkhaldi, Akram Ali, Jae Won Lee . The Lawson-Simons' theorem on warped product submanifolds with geometric information. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5886-5895. doi: 10.3934/math.2021348
    [5] Ali H. Alkhaldi, Meraj Ali Khan, Shyamal Kumar Hui, Pradip Mandal . Ricci curvature of semi-slant warped product submanifolds in generalized complex space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7069-7092. doi: 10.3934/math.2022394
    [6] Aliya Naaz Siddiqui, Meraj Ali Khan, Amira Ishan . Contact CR δ-invariant: an optimal estimate for Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29220-29234. doi: 10.3934/math.20241416
    [7] Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Mohammad Shuaib, Sharief Deshmukh, Tanveer Fatima . ϕ-pluriharmonicity in quasi bi-slant conformal ξ-submersions: a comprehensive study. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21746-21768. doi: 10.3934/math.20231109
    [8] Tanumoy Pal, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Meraj Ali Khan, Biswabismita Bag, Shyamal Kumar Hui, Foued Aloui . Generalized warped product submanifolds of Lorentzian concircular structure manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17997-18012. doi: 10.3934/math.2024877
    [9] Haiming Liu, Jiajing Miao . Gauss-Bonnet theorem in Lorentzian Sasakian space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8772-8791. doi: 10.3934/math.2021509
    [10] Amira A. Ishan, Meraj Ali Khan . Chen-Ricci inequality for biwarped product submanifolds in complex space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5256-5274. doi: 10.3934/math.2021311
  • In this paper we derive the Existence and Uniqueness Theorems for pointwise slant immersions in Sasakian space forms which extend the Existence and Uniqueness Theorems for slant immersions in Sasakian space forms proved by Cabreizo et al in 2001.



    In complex geometry, B.-Y Chen [5,6] generalized the concept of totally real and holomorphic submanifolds by defining the slant submanifolds; while in contact geometry, A. Lotta [14] extended the notion to almost contact metric manifolds. In addition, Cabreizo et al. established in [3] the existence and uniqueness theorems for slant immersions in Sasakian space forms and obtained similar results of Chen and L. Vrancken [8,9]. In contact geometry, this subject was studied in many structures, such as cosymplectic space forms [12] and Kenmotsu space forms [15].

    The pointwise slant submanifolds were introduced by F. Etayo [11] under the name of quasi-slant submanifolds. Later, Chen and Garay [7] studied pointwise slant submanifolds of almost Hermitian manifolds. After that Park [16] studied this idea in almost contact metric manifolds. In particular, the study of pointwise slant immersions of Sasakian manfolds were presented in [13]. Recently, the pointwise slant submanifolds were studied in different structures on a Riemannian manifold [17,18,20].

    As continuation of [1], in this paper we extend the study for existence and uniqueness theorems in contact geometry, especially in Sasakian space forms. First, we review basic formulas and properties for the pointwise slant submanifolds of an almost contact metric manifold which we shall use later. Then, we present the existence and uniqueness theorems. Furthermore, at the end of this paper, we provide some non-trivial examples of general pointwise slant immersions in Euclidean spaces with an almost contact structure.

    Let ˜M be a (2m+1) dimensional Riemannian manifold, then ˜M is said to be an almost contact metric manifold if it equipped with an almost contact metric structure (ϕ,ξ,η,g) such that ϕ is a tensor field of type (1,1), ξ a structure vector field, η is a 1-form and g is a Riemannian metric on ˜M satisfying the following properties [2]

    ϕ2X=X+η(X)ξ,φξ=0,η(φX)=0,η(ξ)=1, (2.1)

    and

    g(ϕX,ϕY)=g(X,Y)η(X)η(Y),η(X)=g(X,ξ), (2.2)

    for any X,YΓ(T˜M), where Γ(T˜M) be the set of all smooth vector fields on ˜M.

    In other words, from (2.2), we see that

    g(ϕX,Y)=g(X,ϕY),

    which means that g(ϕX,X)=0, i.e., ϕXX for each vector field X on ˜M.

    An almost contact metric structure (ϕ,ξ,η,g) on ˜M is called a contact metric structure if dη=Ω, where Ω is the fundamental 2-form, defined by Ω(X,Y)=g(ϕX,Y) [2].

    If we extend the Riemannian connection ˜ to be a covariant derivative of the tensor field ϕ, then we have the following formula

    (˜Xϕ)Y=˜XϕYϕ˜XY, (2.3)

    for any X,YΓ(T˜M).

    If the structure vector field ξ is Killing with respect to g, the contact metric structure is called a K-contact structure. It is known that a contact metric manifold is K-contact if and only if

    ˜Xξ=ϕX,

    for all XΓ(T˜M).

    An almost contact structure on ˜M is said to be normal if,

    Nϕ+2dηξ=0,

    where Nϕ is the Nijenhuis tensor of the tensor field ϕ. A normal contact metric manifold is called a Sasakian manifold.

    It is easy to show that an almost contact metric manifold is Sasakian if and only if [2]

    (˜Xϕ)Y=g(X,Y)ξη(Y)X, (2.4)

    for any X,YΓ(T˜M). Furthermore, from (2.4), we find that

    ˜Xξ=ϕX. (2.5)

    Every Sasakian manifold is a K-contact metric manifold.

    Let ˜M be a (2m+1) dimensional Sasakian manifold, and π be a plane section in the tangent space Tp˜M, then π is said to be a ϕ-section if it is spanned by X and ϕX, such that X be a unit tangent vector field orthogonal to ξ. The sectional curvature K(π) of a ϕ-section π is said to be ϕ-sectional curvature. The Sasakian manifold ˜M with the constant ϕ-sectional curvature c is called a Sasakian space form. We denote by ˜M2m+1(c) the complete simply connected Sasakian space form of dimension (2m+1) with the constant ϕ-sectional curvature c[19].

    The curvature tensor of ˜M2m+1(c) is given by

    ˜R(X,Y)Z=c+34{g(Y,Z)Xg(X,Z)Y}+c14{η(X)η(Z)Yη(Y)η(Z)X+g(X,Z)η(Y)ξg(Y,Z)η(X)ξ+g(ϕY,Z)ϕXg(ϕX,Z)ϕY+2g(X,ϕY)ϕZ}, (2.6)

    for any X,Y,ZΓ(T˜M)[2].

    Now, let M be a (n+1)-dimensional submanifold of an almost contact metric manifold. We denote by TM the tangent bundle of M and by TM the set of all vectors fields normal to M. For any XΓ(TM), we put

    ϕX=TX+FX, (2.7)

    where TX and FX are the tangential and normal components of ϕX, respectively. Also, for any UΓ(TM), we write

    ϕU=tU+fU, (2.8)

    where tU and fU are the tangential and normal components of ϕU, respectively.

    A submanifold M of an almost contact metric manifold ˜M tangent to the structure vector field ξ is called an invariant if F is identically zero, that is ϕXΓ(TM), for any XΓ(TM), while M is called an anti-invariant if T is identically zero, that is ϕXΓ(TM), for any XΓ(TM).

    Let indicate the Levi-Civita connection on M, while is the normal connection in the normal bundle TM of M. Then, the Gauss and Weingarten formulas are given respectively by

    ˜XY=XY+h(X,Y),
    ˜XU=AUX+XU,

    for any X,YΓ(TM) and UΓ(TM) such that h is the second fundamental form of M, and AU is the shape operator corresponding to U, which are related by

    g(AUX,Y)=g(h(X,Y),U). (2.9)

    If we let R be the curvature tensor of M, and R be the curvature tensor of the normal connection . Then the equation of Gauss, Ricci and Codazzi are given respectively by [4]

    ˜R(X,Y;Z,W)=R(X,Y;Z,W)+g(h(X,Z),h(Y,W))g(h(X,W),h(Y,Z)), (2.10)
    ˜R(X,Y;U,V)=R(X,Y;U,V)g([AU,AV]X,Y) (2.11)

    and

    (˜R(X,Y)Z)=(¯Xh)(Y,Z)(¯Yh)(X,Z), (2.12)

    for all X,Y,Z,WΓ(TM), and U,VΓ(TM), where (˜R(X,Y)Z) denotes the normal component of ˜R(X,Y)Z, and the covariant derivative ¯h is given by

    (¯Xh)(Y,Z)=Xh(Y,Z)h(XY,Z)h(Y,XZ). (2.13)

    The covariant derivative of T and F, respectively given by

    (XT)Y=XTYT(XY), (2.14)
    (XF)Y=XFYF(XY). (2.15)

    In this section we recall some results of pointwise slant submanifolds of an almost contact metric manifold ˜M.

    Definition 3.1. [16] A submanifold M of an almost contact metric manifold ˜M is said to be pointwise slant, if for each point pM, the Wirtinger angle θ(X) between ϕX and TpM is independent of the choice of a non-zero vector XTpM. The Wirtinger angle gives rise to a real-valued function θ:TM{0}R which is called the Wirtinger function or slant function of the pointwise slant submanifold.

    We note that a pointwise slant submanifold of ˜M is called slant, if its Wirtinger function θ is globally constant and also, it is called a proper pointwise slant if it is neither invariant nor anti-invariant nor θ is constant on M [5,6].

    We recall the following result for a pointwise slant submanifold of an almost contact metric manifold ˜M [20].

    Theorem 3.1. A submanifold M tangent to the structure vector field ξ is a pointwise θ-slant submanifold of an almost contact metric manifold ˜M if and only if

    T2X=cos2θ(X+η(X)ξ), (3.1)

    for the slant function θ defined on M.

    The following relations are the consequence of Eq (3.1)

    g(TX,TY)=cos2θ(g(X,Y)η(X)η(Y)), (3.2)
    g(FX,FY)=sin2θ(g(X,Y)η(X)η(Y)). (3.3)

    for any X,YΓ(TM).

    Another useful relation for pointwise slant submanifolds of ˜M comes from (2.1) and (3.1) given in [20] as follows:

    (a)tFX=sin2θ(X+η(X)ξ),(b)fFX=FTX, (3.4)

    for all XΓ(TM).

    Lemma 3.1. [13] Let M be a pointwise θ-slant submanifold in Sasakian manifold ˜M. Then, we have

    (XT)Y=AFYX+th(X,Y)+g(X,Y)ξη(Y)X, (3.5)
    (XF)Y=fh(X,Y)h(X,TY), (3.6)

    for any X,YΓ(TM).

    Throughout this paper, we assume that the structure vector field ξ is tangent to M. Thus, if we denote by D the orthogonal distribution to ξ in TM, then we can take the orthogonal direct decomposition TM=Dξ.

    From (2.5) and (2.7) with Gauss formula, we get that

    Xξ=TXandh(X,ξ)=FX. (3.7)

    Now, for each XΓ(TM) with θ0, we put

    X=(cscθ)FX. (3.8)

    Let β be a symmetric bilinear TM-valued form on M defined by

    β(X,Y)=th(X,Y), (3.9)

    for any X,YΓ(TM). From (3.4) and (3.7), the above equation takes the form

    β(X,ξ)=(sin2θ)(Xη(X)ξ). (3.10)

    Using (2.7) and (3.8) in (3.9), we obtain

    ϕβ(X,Y)=Tβ(X,Y)+(sinθ)β(X,Y). (3.11)

    Then by (2.8) and (3.9), we find

    ϕh(X,Y)=β(X,Y)+γ(X,Y),

    where γ be a symmetric bilinear D-valued form on M defined by γ(X,Y)=fh(X,Y). Applying the almost contact structure ϕ on the above equation, then using (2.1), (2.8) and (3.11), we get

    h(X,Y)=Tβ(X,Y)+(sinθ)β(X,Y)+tγ(X,Y)+fγ(X,Y),

    as η(h(X,Y))=0. Equating the tangential and the normal components of the above relation, we obtain

    Tβ(X,Y)=tγ(X,Y),h(X,Y)=(sinθ)β(X,Y)+fγ(X,Y).

    Using (3.1), (3.4) and (3.8), we conclude that

    γ(X,Y)=(cscθ)Tβ(X,Y).

    Also,

    h(X,Y)=(cscθ)β(X,Y), (3.12)

    Using (2.7) and (3.8), the above equation takes the form

    h(X,Y)=(csc2θ)(Tβ(X,Y)ϕβ(X,Y)). (3.13)

    Taking the inner product of (3.5) with ZΓ(TM) and using (2.2), (2.7)–(2.9) and (3.9), we derive

    g((XT)Y,Z)=g(β(X,Y),Z)g(β(X,Z),Y)+g(X,Y)η(Z)g(X,Z)η(Y).

    For (n+1)-dimensional pointwise θ-slant submanifold M of ˜M2m+1(c), we derive the equation of Gauss and Codazzi of M in ˜M2m+1(c) as follows:

    From (2.6) and (2.7), we have

    ˜R(X,Y;Z,W)=c+34{g(X,W)g(Y,Z)g(X,Z)g(Y,W)}+c14{η(X)η(Z)g(Y,W)η(Y)η(Z)g(X,W)+η(Y)η(W)g(X,Z)η(X)η(W)g(Y,Z)+g(TX,W)g(TY,Z)g(TX,Z)g(TY,W)+2g(X,TY)g(TZ,W)}.

    From (2.10), (3.2) and (3.13), the above equation takes the form

    R(X,Y;Z,W)=csc2θ{g(β(X,W),β(Y,Z))g(β(X,Z),β(Y,W))}+c+34{g(X,W)g(Y,Z)g(X,Z)g(Y,W)}+c14{η(X)η(Z)g(Y,W)η(Y)η(Z)g(X,W)+η(Y)η(W)g(X,Z)η(X)η(W)g(Y,Z)+g(TX,W)g(TY,Z)g(TX,Z)g(TY,W)+2g(X,TY)g(TZ,W)},

    which gives us the Gauss equation of M in ˜M2m+1(c).

    Next, for the Codazzi equation if we take the normal parts of (2.6), we obtain

    (˜R(X,Y)Z)=c14{g(TY,Z)FXg(TX,Z)FY+2g(X,TY)FZ}. (3.14)

    Furthermore, it follows from (3.8) and (3.12) that

    X(h(Y,Z))=X((csc2θ)Fβ(Y,Z)),

    which yields

    X(h(Y,Z))=(csc2θ)XFβ(Y,Z)+2(csc2θcotθ)X(θ)Fβ(Y,Z).

    Then by (2.15) and (3.6), the above equation takes the form

    X(h(Y,Z))=(csc2θ)[fh(X,β(Y,Z))h(X,Tβ(Y,Z))+F(Xβ(Y,Z))2(cotθ)X(θ)Fβ(Y,Z)].

    On the other hand, it also from (3.8) and (3.12) that

    h(XY,Z)=(csc2θ)Fβ(XY,Z).

    Similarly,

    h(Y,XZ)=(csc2θ)Fβ(Y,XZ).

    Substituting these relations into (2.13), we obtain

    (¯Xh)(Y,Z)=(csc2θ)[fh(X,β(Y,Z))h(X,Tβ(Y,Z))+F((Xβ)(Y,Z))2(cotθ)X(θ)Fβ(Y,Z)].

    By (3.4), (3.8) and (3.12), we can write

    (¯Xh)(Y,Z)=(csc2θ)[(csc2θ)FTβ(X,β(Y,Z))+(csc2θ)Fβ(X,Tβ(Y,Z))+F((Xβ)(Y,Z))2(cotθ)X(θ)Fβ(Y,Z)]. (3.15)

    Similarly, we have

    (¯Yh)(X,Z)=(csc2θ)[(csc2θ)FTβ(Y,β(X,Z))+(csc2θ)Fβ(Y,Tβ(X,Z))+F((Yβ)(X,Z))2(cotθ)Y(θ)Fβ(X,Z)]. (3.16)

    Finally, applying (3.14)–(3.16) in Codazzi equation, we get

    (Xβ)(Y,Z)g(β(Y,Z),TX)ξ2(cotθ)X(θ)β(Y,Z)+(csc2θ){Tβ(X,β(Y,Z))+β(X,Tβ(Y,Z))}+c14(sin2θ){g(X,TY)(Zη(Z)ξ)+g(X,TZ)(Yη(Y)ξ))}=(Yβ)(X,Z)g(β(X,Z),TY)ξ2(cotθ)Y(θ)β(X,Z)+(csc2θ){Tβ(Y,β(X,Z))+β(Y,Tβ(X,Z))}+c14(sin2θ){ g(Y,TX)(Zη(Z)ξ)+g(Y,TZ)(Xη(X)ξ)}.

    In this section we present the detailed proofs of the existence and uniqueness theorems for pointwise slant immersions into a Sasakian space form.

    Theorem 4.1. (Existence Theorem) Let M be the connected Riemannian manifold of dimension (n+1) equipped with metric tensor g. Suppose that c is a constant and there exists a smooth function θ on M satisfying 0<θπ2, an endomorphism T of the tangent bundle TM, a unit global vector field ξ and a symmetric bilinear TM-valued form β on M such that the following conditions are satisfied:

    T(ξ)=0,g(β(X,Y),ξ)=0,Xξ=TX, (4.1)
    T2X=(cos2θ)(X+η(X)ξ), (4.2)
    g(TX,Y)=g(X,TY), (4.3)
    β(X,ξ)=(sin2θ)(Xη(X)ξ), (4.4)
    g((XT)Y,Z)=g(β(X,Y),Z)g(β(X,Z),Y)+g(X,Y)η(Z)g(X,Z)η(Y), (4.5)
    R(X,Y;Z,W)=(csc2θ){g(β(X,W),β(Y,Z))g(β(X,Z),β(Y,W))}+c+34{g(X,W)g(Y,Z)g(X,Z)g(Y,W)}+c14{η(X)η(Z)g(Y,W)η(Y)η(Z)g(X,W)+η(Y)η(W)g(X,Z)η(X)η(W)g(Y,Z)+g(TX,W)g(TY,Z)g(TX,Z)g(TY,W)+2g(X,TY)g(TZ,W)}, (4.6)

    and

    (Xβ)(Y,Z)g(β(Y,Z),TX)ξ2(cotθ)X(θ)β(Y,Z)+(csc2θ){Tβ(X,β(Y,Z))+β(X,Tβ(Y,Z))}+c14(sin2θ){g(X,TY)(Zη(Z)ξ)+g(X,TZ)(Yη(Y)ξ))}=(Yβ)(X,Z)g(β(X,Z),TY)ξ2(cotθ)Y(θ)β(X,Z)+(csc2θ){Tβ(Y,β(X,Z))+β(Y,Tβ(X,Z))}+c14(sin2θ){ g(Y,TX)(Zη(Z)ξ)+g(Y,TZ)(Xη(X)ξ)}. (4.7)

    for X,Y,ZΓ(TM), where η be the dual 1-form of ξ. Then there exists a pointwise θ-slant isometric immersion of M into a Sasakian space form ˜M2m+1(c) such that the second fundamental form h of M is given by

    h(X,Y)=(csc2θ)(Tβ(X,Y)ϕβ(X,Y)). (4.8)

    Proof. Assume that c,θ,ξ,T and M satisfy the given conditions. Suppose that TMD be a Whitney sum. For each XΓ(TM) and ZΓ(D) we simply denote (X,0) by X, (0,Z) by Z and ˆξ=(ξ,0) with ξ.

    Let ˆg be the product metric on TMD. So, if we set ˆη as the dual 1-form of ˆξ, then ˆη(X,Z)=η(X), for any XTM and ZD.

    We define the endomorphism ˆϕ on TMD by

    ˆϕ(X,0)=(TX,(sinθ)(Xη(X)ξ)),ˆϕ(0,Z)=((sinθ)Z,TZ), (4.9)

    for each XΓ(TM) and ZΓ(D). Then, we find ˆϕ2(X,0)=(X,0)+ˆη(X,0)ˆξ. Also, ˆϕ2(0,Z) = (0,Z). Hence, ˆϕ2(X,Z)=(X,Z)+ˆη(X,Z)ˆξ for any XΓ(TM) and ZΓ(D). From (4.2), (4.3) and (4.9) it is directly to check that (ˆϕ,ˆη,ˆξ,ˆg) is an almost contact metric structure on TMD.

    Now, we can define an endomorphism A on TM, a (D)-valued symmetric bilinear form h on TM and a metric connection of the vector bundle (D) over M by

    AZX=(cscθ){(XT)Zβ(X,Z)g(X,Z)ξ}, (4.10)
    h(X,Y)=(cscθ)β(X,Y), (4.11)
    XZ=(XZη(XZ)ξ)(cotθ)X(θ)Z+(csc2θ){(Tβ(X,Z))+β(X,TZ)}, (4.12)

    for X,YΓ(TM) and ZΓ(D).

    Denote by ˆ the canonical connection on TMD induced from Eqs (4.9)–(4.12). Using (4.1), (4.2), (4.4) and (4.9), we get

    (ˆ(X,0)ˆϕ)(Y,0)=ˆg((X,0),(Y,0))ˆξˆη(Y,0)(X,0),(ˆ(X,0)ˆϕ)(0,Z)=0,

    for any X,YΓ(TM) and ZΓ(D).

    Let R be the curvature tensor associated with the connection on (D), which gives by

    R(X,Y)Z=XYZYXZ[X,Y]Z,

    for any X,YΓ(TM) and ZΓ(D). Then by (4.12), we have

    R(X,Y)Z=X[(YZη(YZ)ξ)(cotθ)Y(θ)Z+csc2θ{(Tβ(Y,Z))+β(Y,TZ)}]Y[(XZη(XZ)ξ)(cotθ)X(θ)Z+csc2θ{(Tβ(X,Z))+β(X,TZ)}]([X,Y]Zη([X,Y]Z)ξ)+(cotθ)[X,Y](θ)Z(csc2θ){(Tβ([X,Y],Z))+β([X,Y],TZ)}.

    Using (2.14), (4.1), (4.3), (4.7) and (4.12), we simplify

    R(X,Y)Z=(csc2θ)[Y(θ)X(θ)]Z+(R(X,Y)Zη(R(X,Y)Z)ξ)+{c14T[g(Y,TZ)Xg(X,TZ)Y2g(X,TY)Z]+c14[g(Y,T2Z)(Xη(X)ξ)g(X,T2Z)(Yη(Y)ξ)2g(X,TY)TZ] (4.13)
    +csc2θ[(˜XT)β(Y,Z)(YT)β(X,Z)η(XTβ(Y,Z))ξ+η(YTβ(X,Z))ξβ(X,(YT)Z)+β(Y,XT)Z)]}. (4.14)

    Moreover, from (4.1), (4.5), (4.10) and (4.11), we derive

    g([AZ,AW]X,Y)=csc2θ{g((XT)W,(YT)Z)g((XT)Z,(YT)W)+g((XT)Z,β(Y,W))+g((YT)W,β(X,Z))g((XT)W,β(Y,Z))g((YT)Z,β(X,W))+g(β(X,W),β(Y,Z))g(β(X,Z),β(Y,W))+(12cos2θ)(g(X,W)g(Y,Z)g(X,Z)g(Y,W))}. (4.15)

    Also, using (4.3), we can write

    g(β(Y,Z),TW)+g(Tβ(Y,Z),W)=0.

    Taking the covariant derivative of the above equation with respect to X and using (4.3), we obtain

    g(β(Y,Z),(XT)W)+g((XT)β(Y,Z),W)=0.

    Furthermore, from (4.5), we find

    g((XT)Z,(YT)W)=g((XT)Z,β(Y,W))g(β(Y,(XT)Z),W)+cos2θg(X,Z)g(Y,W).

    Substituting the pervious relations in (4.13) and (4.15) with a direct computation, we arrive at

    g(R(X,Y)Z,W)g([AZ,AW]X,Y)=c14[(sin2θ){g(X,W)g(Y,Z)g(X,Z)g(Y,W)}2g(X,TY)g(TZ,W)]+(csc2θ)[Y(θ)X(θ)] g(Z,W).

    Notice that the above equation together with (2.6), (4.2) and (4.3) implies that (M,A,) satisfies the Ricci equation of a (n+1)-dimensional pointwise θ-slant submanifold of the Sasakian space form ˜M2m+1(c), while (4.6) and (4.7) mean that (M,h) satisfies the equations of Gauss and Codazzi, respectively. Therefore, we have a vector bundle TMD over M equipped with product metric g, the second fundamental form h, the shape operator A, and the connections and ˆ which satisfy the structure equations of a (n+1)-dimensional pointwise θ-slant submanifold of ˜M2m+1(c). Consequently, by applying Theorem 1 of [10] we conclude that there exists a pintwise θ-slant isometric immersion from M into ˜M2m+1(c) whose second fundamental form is given by h(X,Y)=csc2θ(Tβ(X,Y)ϕβ(X,Y)).

    The next result provides the sufficient conditions to have the uniqueness property for pointwise slant immersions.

    Theorem 4.2. (Uniqueness Theorem) Let ˜M2m+1(c) be a Sasakian space form and M be a connected Riemannian manifold of dimension (n+1). Let x1,x2:MM2m+1(c) be two pointwise θ-slant isometric immersions such that 0<θπ2. Suppose that h1 and h2 be the second fundamental forms of x1 and x2, respectively. Assume that there exists a vector field ˆξ on M satisfies xip(ˆξp)=ξxi(p), for any pM and any i=1,2. Suppose that

    g(h1(X,Y),ϕx1Z)=g(h2(X,Y),ϕx2Z), (4.16)

    for all X,Y,ZΓ(TM). In addition, if we consider that at least one of the following conditions is satisfied:

    (i) θ=π2,

    (ii) there exists a point p in M such that T1=T2,

    (iii) c0,

    then T1=T2 and there exists an isometry α of ˜M2m+1(c) such that x1=α(x2).

    Proof. The proof of this Theorem is similar of the Uniqueness Theorem in the complex space forms (see [1,8]) by taking ˆξ in the orthonormal frame tangent to M.

    In this section we give some examples of general pointwise slant immersions in an almost contact metric manifolds.

    Example 5.1. Consider the Euclidean 5-space R5 with the cartesian coordinates (x1,x2,y1,y2,t) and the almost contact structure

    ϕ(xi)=yi,ϕ(yj)=xj,ϕ(t)=0,1i,j2,

    such that ξ=t, η=dt and g be the standard Euclidean metric on R5. It is easy to show R5 is an almost contact metric manifold with an almost contact metric structure (ϕ,ξ,η,g). Let M be a submanifold of R5 given by the immersion ψ as follows:

    ψ(u,v,t)=(2v,cosu,sinu,0,t),

    where u,v are non vanishing real valued functions on M. Then the tangent space of M is spanned by the following vectors

    X1=sinux2+cosuy1,X2=2x1, X3=t.

    Then,

    ϕX1=sinuy2+cosux1,ϕX2=2y1, ϕX3=0.

    Hence, the slant angle is given by

    cosθ=g(X2,ϕX1)X2ϕX1=2cosu2=cosu.

    So, θ=u is a slant function and from it ψ is a pointwise slant immersion with pointwise slant distribution Dθ=Span{X1,X2} and TM=Dθξ.

    Example 5.2. Let R7 be the Euclidean 7-space with the cartesian coordinates (xi,yj,t) and the almost contact structure

    ϕ(xi)=yi,ϕ(yj)=xj,ϕ(t)=0,1i,j3,

    such that ξ=t, η=dt and g be the standard Euclidean metric on R7. Consider a submanifold M of R7 given by the following immersion:

    ψ(u,v,t)=(ucosv,vcosu,u,usinv,vsinu,kv,t),

    for any u,v non vanishing real valued functions and k0 be a real number. Then, the tangent space of M is spanned by the following vectors

    X1=cosvx1vsinux2+x3+sinvy1+vcosuy2,X2=usinvx1+cosux2+ucosvy1+sinuy2+ky3,X3=t.

    Clearly, we obtain

    ϕX1=cosvy1+vsinuy2y3+sinvx1+vcosux2,ϕX2=usinvy1cosuy2+ucosvx1+sinux2+kx3,ϕX3=0.

    Then, we find that the slant angle satisfies θ=cos1(uv+kv2+2u2+k2+1), since u,v\, (uv) are non vanishing real valued functions on M, hence the slant angle is none constant. Thus, M is a pointwise slant submanifold of R7 with the slant function θ and pointwise slant distribution Dθ=Span{X1,X2}, where TM=Dθξ.

    Example 5.3. A submanifold M of R13 given by the following immersion

    ψ(u,v,t)=(eu,2u,sinv,u,uv,cosu,eu,v,cosv,v,u+v,sinu,t),

    for non vanishing u,v. We set the the tangent space TM of M is spanned by the following vectors

    X1=eux1+2x2+x4+x5sinux6euy1+y5+cosuy6,X2=cosvx3x5+y2sinvy3y4+y5,X3=t.

    Clearly, we have

    ϕX1=euy12y2y4y5+sinuy6eux1+x5+cosux6,ϕX2=cosvy3+y5+x2sinvx3x4+x5,ϕX3=0.

    It is easy to see that M is a pointwise slant submanifold with slant function θ=cos1(325(e2u+4)12) and Dθ=Span{X1,X2}, where TM=Dθξ. $

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] A. Alghanemi, N. Al-Houiti, B. Chen, S. Uddin, Existence and uniqueness theorems for pointwise slant immersions in complex space forms, Filomat, 35 (2021), 3127–3138. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FIL2109127A doi: 10.2298/FIL2109127A
    [2] D. Blair, Contact manifolds in Riemannian geometry, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0079307
    [3] J. Cabreizo, A. Carriazo, L. Fernandez, M. Fernandez, Existence and uniqueness theorem for slant immersions in Sasakian space forms, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 58 (2001), 559–574.
    [4] B. Chen, Geometry of submanifolds, New York: Dover Publication, 1973.
    [5] B. Chen, Slant immersions, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc., 41 (1990), 135–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700017925 doi: 10.1017/S0004972700017925
    [6] B. Chen, Geometry of slant submanifolds, arXiv: 1307.1512.
    [7] B. Chen, O. Garary, Pointwise slant submanifolds in almost Hermitian manifolds, Turk. J. Math., 36 (2012), 630–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/mat-1101-34 doi: 10.3906/mat-1101-34
    [8] B. Chen, L. Vranken, Existence and uniqueness theorem for slant immersions and its applications, Results Math., 31 (1997), 28–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03322149 doi: 10.1007/BF03322149
    [9] B. Chen, L. Vranken, Addendum to: existence and uniqueness theorem for slant immersions and its applications, Results Math., 39 (2001), 18–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03322673 doi: 10.1007/BF03322673
    [10] J. Eschenburg, R. Tribuzy, Existence and uniqueness of maps into affine homogeneous spaces, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Pad., 89 (1993), 11–18.
    [11] F. Etayo, On quasi-slant submanifolds of an almost Hermitian manifold, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 53 (1998), 217–223.
    [12] R. Gupta, S. Khursheed Haider, A. Sharfuddin, Existence and uniqueness theorem for slant immersion in cosymplectic space forms, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 67 (2005), 169–188.
    [13] S. Kumar, R. Prasad, Pointwise slant submersions from Sasakian manifolds, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 8 (2018), 454–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.28919/jmcs/3684 doi: 10.28919/jmcs/3684
    [14] A. Lotta, Slant submanifolds in contact geometry, Bull. Math. Soc. Roumanie, 39 (1996), 183–198.
    [15] P. Pandey, R. Gupta, Existence and uniqueness theorem for slant immersions in Kenmotsu space forms, Turk. J. Math., 33 (2009), 409–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/mat-0804-23 doi: 10.3906/mat-0804-23
    [16] K. Park, Pointwise slant and Pointwise semi-slant submanifolds in almost contact metric manifolds, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 985. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math8060985 doi: 10.3390/math8060985
    [17] K. Park, Pointwise almost h-semi-slant submanifolds, Int. J. Math., 26 (2012), 15500998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X15500998 doi: 10.1142/S0129167X15500998
    [18] B. Sahin, Warped product pointwise semi-slant submanifolds of Kähler manifolds, Port. Math., 70 (2013), 251–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.4171/PM/1934 doi: 10.4171/PM/1934
    [19] S. Tanno, Sasakian manifolds with constant ϕ-holomorphic sectional curvature, Tohoku Math. J., 21 (1969), 501–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1178242960 doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178242960
    [20] S. Uddin, A. Al-Khalidi, Pointwise slant submanifolds and their Warped product in Sasakian manifolds, Filomat, 32 (2018), 4131–4142. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FIL1812131U doi: 10.2298/FIL1812131U
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Noura Alhouiti, Theorems of existence and uniqueness for pointwise-slant immersions in Kenmotsu space forms, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 17489, 10.3934/math.2024850
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1514) PDF downloads(49) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog