A study of quadratic Diophantine fuzzy sets with structural properties and their application in face mask detection during COVID-19

Muhammad Danish Zia; Esmail Hassan Abdullatif Al-Sabri; Faisal Yousafzai; Murad-ul-Islam Khan; Rashad Ismail; Mohammed M. Khalaf; Muhammad Danish Zia; Esmail Hassan Abdullatif Al-Sabri; Faisal Yousafzai; Murad-ul-Islam Khan; Rashad Ismail; Mohammed M. Khalaf

doi:10.3934/math.2023738

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 6: 14449-14474. doi: 10.3934/math.2023738

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

A study of quadratic Diophantine fuzzy sets with structural properties and their application in face mask detection during COVID-19

1.
Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
2.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Mahayl Assir, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
3.
Department of Mathematics and Computer, Faculty of Science, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen
4.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan
5.
Department of Mathematics, Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, King Marriott, Egypt, P.O. Box 3135, Egypt

Received: 25 January 2023 Revised: 11 March 2023 Accepted: 21 March 2023 Published: 19 April 2023
MSC : 03E72, 90B50, 94D05

During the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying face masks with artificial intelligence was a crucial challenge for decision support systems. To address this challenge, we propose a quadratic Diophantine fuzzy decision-making model to rank artificial intelligence techniques for detecting masks, aiming to prevent the global spread of the disease. Our paper introduces the innovative concept of quadratic Diophantine fuzzy sets (QDFSs), which are advanced tools for modeling the uncertainty inherent in a given phenomenon. We investigate the structural properties of QDFSs and demonstrate that they generalize various fuzzy sets. In addition, we introduce essential algebraic operations, set-theoretical operations, and aggregation operators. Finally, we present a numerical case study that applies our proposed algorithms to select a unique face mask detection method and evaluate the effectiveness of our techniques. Our findings demonstrate the viability of our mask identification methodology during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Keywords:

Citation: Muhammad Danish Zia, Esmail Hassan Abdullatif Al-Sabri, Faisal Yousafzai, Murad-ul-Islam Khan, Rashad Ismail, Mohammed M. Khalaf. A study of quadratic Diophantine fuzzy sets with structural properties and their application in face mask detection during COVID-19[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14449-14474. doi: 10.3934/math.2023738

Related Papers:

[1]	Zhenshu Wen, Lijuan Shi . Exact explicit nonlinear wave solutions to a modified cKdV equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4917-4930. doi: 10.3934/math.2020314
[2]	Abdulghani R. Alharbi . Traveling-wave and numerical solutions to a Novikov-Veselov system via the modified mathematical methods. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1230-1250. doi: 10.3934/math.2023062
[3]	Naher Mohammed A. Alsafri, Hamad Zogan . Probing the diversity of kink solitons in nonlinear generalised Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony dynamical model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34886-34905. doi: 10.3934/math.20241661
[4]	M. Ali Akbar, Norhashidah Hj. Mohd. Ali, M. Tarikul Islam . Multiple closed form solutions to some fractional order nonlinear evolution equations in physics and plasma physics. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 397-411. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.397
[5]	Maysaa Al-Qurashi, Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Madeeha Tahir, Abdullah M. Alsharif . New computations for the two-mode version of the fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov model in plasma fluid by means of the Shehu decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2044-2060. doi: 10.3934/math.2022117
[6]	Yunmei Zhao, Yinghui He, Huizhang Yang . The two variable (φ/φ, 1/φ)-expansion method for solving the time-fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4121-4135. doi: 10.3934/math.2020264
[7]	Naveed Iqbal, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Meshari Alesemi, Taher S. Hassan, Ali M. Mahnashi, Ahmad Shafee . Reliable analysis for obtaining exact soliton solutions of (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee-Infante equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16666-16686. doi: 10.3934/math.2024808
[8]	Hammad Alotaibi . Solitary waves of the generalized Zakharov equations via integration algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12650-12677. doi: 10.3934/math.2024619
[9]	M. A. El-Shorbagy, Sonia Akram, Mati ur Rahman, Hossam A. Nabwey . Analysis of bifurcation, chaotic structures, lump and $M-W$ -shape soliton solutions to $(2+1)$ complex modified Korteweg-de-Vries system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16116-16145. doi: 10.3934/math.2024780
[10]	M. Hafiz Uddin, M. Ali Akbar, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Md. Abdul Haque . New exact solitary wave solutions to the space-time fractional differential equations with conformable derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 199-214. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.199

Abstract

1. Introduction

The convexity of function is a classical concept, since it plays a fundamental role in mathematical programming theory, game theory, mathematical economics, variational science, optimal control theory and other fields, a new branch of mathematics, convex analysis, appeared in the 1960s. However, it has been noticed that the functions encountered in a large number of theoretical and practical problems in economics are not classical convex functions, therefore, in the past decades, the generalization of function convexity has attracted the attention of many scholars and aroused great interest, such as $h$ -convex functions ^[1,2,3,4,5], $\log$ -convex functions ^[6,7,8,9,10], $\log$ - $h$ -convex functions ^[11], and especially for coordinated convex ^[12]. Since 2001, various extensions and generalizations of integral inequalities for coordinated convex functions have been established in ^{[12,13,14,15,16,17]}.

On the other hand, calculation error has always been a troublesome problem in numerical analysis. In many problems, it is often to speculate the accuracy of calculation results or use high-precision operation as far as possible to ensure the accuracy of the results, because the accumulation of calculation errors may make the calculation results meaningless, interval analysis as a new important tool to solve uncertainty problems has attracted much attention and also has yielded fruitful results, we refer the reader to the papers ^[18,19]. It is worth notion that in recent decades, many authors have combined integral inequalities with interval-valued functions(IVFs) and obtained many excellent conclusions. In ^[20], Costa gave Opial-type inequalities for IVFs. In ^[21,22], Chalco-Cano investigated Ostrowski type inequalities for IVFs by using generalized Hukuhara derivative. In ^[23], Román-Flores derived the Minkowski type inequalities and Beckenbach's type inequalities for IVFs. Very recently, Zhao ^[5,24] established the Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for interval-valued coordinated functions.

Motivated by these results, in the present paper, we introduce the concept of coordinated log- $h$ -convex for IVFs, and then present some new Jensen type inequalities and Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for interval-valued coordinated functions. Also, we give some examples to illustrate our main results.

2. Preliminaries

Let $\mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}$ the collection of all closed and bounded intervals of $\mathbb{R}$ . We use $\; \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}\;$ and $\; \mathbb{R}^{+}$ to represent the set of all positive intervals and the family of all positive real numbers respectively. The collection of all Riemann integrable real-valued functions on $[a, b]$ , IVFs on $[a, b]$ and IVFs on $\triangle = [a, b]\times[c, d]$ are denoted by $\mathcal{R}_{([a, b])}$ , $\mathcal{IR}_{([a, b])}$ and $\mathcal{ID}_{(\triangle)}$ . For more conceptions on IVFs, see ^[4,25]. Moreover, we have

Theorem 1. ^[4] Let $f:[a, b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}$ such that $f = [\underline{f}, \overline{f}]$ . Then $f\in\mathcal{IR}_{([a, b])}$ iff $\underline{f}$ , $\overline{f}\in\mathcal{R}_{([a, b])}$ and

$\begin{equation*} (\mathcal{IR})\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = \left[(\mathcal{R})\int_{a}^{b}\underline{f}(x)dx,(\mathcal{R})\int_{a}^{b}\overline{f}(x)dx\right]. \end{equation*}$

Theorem 2. ^[25] Let $\mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}$ . If $\mathcal{F}\in\mathcal{ID}_{(\triangle)}$ , then

$\begin{equation*} (\mathcal{ID})\iint_{\triangle} {\mathcal{F}}(x,y)dxdy = (\mathcal{IR})\int_{a}^{b}dx(\mathcal{IR})\int_{c}^{ d}\mathcal{{F}}(x,y)dy. \end{equation*}$

Definition 1. ^[26] Let $h:[0, 1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$ . We say that $f:[a, b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ is interval $\log$ - $h$ -convex function or that $f\in SX(\log\text{-}h, [a, b], \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}),$ if for all $x, y\in[a, b]$ and $\vartheta\in[0, 1],$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{hi} f(\vartheta x+(1-\vartheta)y)\supseteq [f(x)]^{h(\vartheta)}[f(y)]^{h(1-\vartheta)}. \end{eqnarray*}$

$h$ is called supermultiplicative if

$\begin{eqnarray} h(\vartheta\tau)\geq h(\vartheta)h(\tau) \end{eqnarray}$

(2.1)

for all $\vartheta, \tau\in[0, 1]$ . If " $\geq$ " in (2.1) is replaced with " $\leq$ ", then $h$ is called submultiplicative.

Theorem 3. ^[26] Let $\mathcal{F}:[a, b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}, h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\not = 0.$ If $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, [a, b], \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ and $\mathcal{F}\in\mathcal{IR}_{([a, b])}$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\supseteq \exp\left[\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x)dx\right]\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}(a)\mathcal{F}(b)\right]^{\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.2)

Theorem 4. ^[27] Let $\mathcal{F}:[a, b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}, h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\not = 0.$ If $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, [a, b], \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ and $\mathcal{F}\in\mathcal{IR}_{([a, b])}$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{aligned} \left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2}\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}&\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{3a+b}{4}\right)\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+3b}{4}\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\\ \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; &\supseteq\left(\int_{a}^{b}\mathcal{F}(x)dx\right)^{\frac{1}{b-a}}\\ &\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}(a)\mathcal{F}(b)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(\frac{a+b}{2}\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}\\ &\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}(a)\mathcal{F}(b)\right]^{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}.\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray}$

(2.3)

3. Main results

In this section, we define the coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -convex for IVFs and prove some new Jensen type inequalities and Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities by using this new definition.

Definition 2. Let $h:[0, 1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$ . Then $\mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ is called a coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -convex IVFs on $\triangle$ if the partial mappings

$\begin{eqnarray*} &\mathcal{F}_{y}:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+},\mathcal{F}_{y}(x) = \mathcal{F}(x,y),\\ &\mathcal{F}_{x}:[c,d]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+},\mathcal{F}_{x}(y) = \mathcal{F}(x,y) \end{eqnarray*}$

are $\log$ - $h$ -convex for all $y\in[c, d]$ and $x\in[a, b]$ . Then the set of all coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -convex IVFs on $\triangle$ is denoted by $SX(\log\text{-}ch, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ .

Definition 3. Let $h:[0, 1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$ . Then $\mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$ is called a coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -convex function in $\triangle$ if for any $(x_{1}, y_{1}), (x_{2}, y_{2})\in\triangle$ and $\vartheta\in[0, 1]$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{aligned} \mathcal{F}(\vartheta x_{1}+(1-\vartheta)x_{2},\vartheta y_{1}+(1-\vartheta)y_{2})\leq \left[\mathcal{F}( x_{1},y_{1})\right]^{h(\vartheta)}\left[\mathcal{F}(x_{2},y_{2})\right]^{h(1-\vartheta)}. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

The set of all $\log$ - $h$ -convex functions in $\triangle$ is denoted by $SX(\log\text{-}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}^{+}).$ If inequality (3.1) is reversed, then $\mathcal{F}$ is said to be a coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -concave function, the set of all $\log$ - $h$ -concave functions in $\triangle$ is denoted by $SV(\log\text{-}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}^{+}).$

Definition 4. Let $h:[0, 1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$ . Then $\mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ is called a coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -convex IVF in $\triangle$ if for any $(x_{1}, y_{1}), (x_{2}, y_{2})\in\triangle$ and $\vartheta\in[0, 1]$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}(\vartheta x_{1}+(1-\vartheta)x_{2},\vartheta y_{1}+(1-\vartheta)y_{2})\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}( x_{1},y_{1})\right]^{h(\vartheta)}\left[\mathcal{F}(x_{2},y_{2})\right]^{h(1-\vartheta)}. \end{eqnarray*}$

The set of all $\log$ - $h$ -convex IVFs in $\triangle$ is denoted by $SX(\log\text{-}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}).$

Theorem 5. Let $\mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ such that $\mathcal{F} = [\mathcal{\underline{F}}, \mathcal{\overline{F}}]$ . If $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ iff $\mathcal{\underline{F}}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}^{+})$ and $\mathcal{\overline{F}}\in SV(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}^{+})$ .

Proof. The proof is completed by combining the Definitions 3 and 4 above and the Theorem 3.7 of ^[4].

Theorem 6. If $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ , then $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}ch, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ .

Proof. Assume that $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\text{-}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ . Let $\mathcal{F}_{x}:[c, d]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}, \mathcal{F}_{x}(y) = \mathcal{F}(x, y).$ Then for all $\vartheta\in[0, 1]$ and $y_{1}, y_{2}\in[c, d]$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} \mathcal{F}_{x}(\vartheta y_{1}+(1-\vartheta)y_{2})& = \mathcal{F}(x,\vartheta y_{1}+(1-\vartheta)y_{2})\\ &\supseteq \mathcal{F}(\vartheta x+(1-\vartheta)x,\vartheta y_{1}+(1-\vartheta)y_{2})\\ &\supseteq \left[\mathcal{F}( x,y_{1})\right]^{h(\vartheta)}\left[\mathcal{F}(x,y_{2})\right]^{h(1-\vartheta)}\\ & = \left[\mathcal{F}_{x}(y_{1})\right]^{h(\vartheta)}\left[\mathcal{F}_{x}(y_{2})\right]^{h(1-\vartheta)}. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Hence $\mathcal{F}_{x}(y) = \mathcal{F}(x, y)$ is $\log$ - $h$ -convex on $[c, d]$ . The fact that $\mathcal{F}_{y}(x) = \mathcal{F}(x, y)$ is $\log$ - $h$ -convex on $[a, b]$ goes likewise.

Remark 1. The converse of Theorem 6 is not generally true. Let $h(\vartheta) = \vartheta$ and $\vartheta\in[0, 1]$ , $\triangle_{1} = \left[\frac{\pi}{4}, \frac{\pi}{2}\right]\times\left[\frac{\pi}{4}, \frac{\pi}{2}\right]$ , and $\mathcal{F}:\triangle_{1}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ be defined:

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}(x,y) = \left[e^{-sin x-sin y},64xy\right]. \end{eqnarray*}$

Obviously, we have that $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\text{-}ch, \triangle_{1}, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ and $\mathcal{F}\not\in SX(\log\text{-}h, \triangle_{1}, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}).$ Indeed, if $\left(\frac{\pi}{4}, \frac{\pi}{2}\right), \left(\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{4}\right)\in\triangle_{1}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}\left(\vartheta\frac{\pi}{4}+(1-\vartheta)\frac{\pi}{2},\vartheta\frac{\pi}{2}+(1-\vartheta)\frac{\pi}{4}\right) = \left[e^{-sin\frac{\vartheta\pi}{4}-sin\frac{(1-\vartheta)\pi}{2}},8\pi^{2}\vartheta(1-\vartheta)\right],\\ \left(\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{\pi}{4},\frac{\pi}{2}\right)\right)^{h(\vartheta)}\left(\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{4}\right)\right)^{h(1-\vartheta)} = \left[e^{\left(1-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\right)\vartheta-1},2^{\vartheta+1}\pi\right]. \end{eqnarray*}$

If $\vartheta = 0,$ then

$\left[0,\frac{1}{e}\right]\not\supseteq\left[\frac{1}{e},2\pi\right].$

Thus, $\mathcal{F}\not\in SX(\log\text{-}h, \triangle_{1}, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}).$

In the following, Jensen type inequalities for coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -convex functions in $\triangle$ is considered.

Theorem 7. Let $p_{i}\in\mathbb{R}^{+}, x_{i}\in[a, b], y_{i}\in[c, d], (i = 1, 2, ..., n), \mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}.$ If $h$ is a nonnegative supermultiplicative function and $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}^{+})$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{F}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\leq\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\right)}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.2)

where $\mathcal{P}_{n} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}$ . If $h$ is a nonnegative submultiplicative function and $\mathcal{F}\in SV(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}^{+})$ , then $(3.2)$ is reversed.

Proof. If $n = 2,$ then from Definition 3, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}\left(\frac{p_{1}}{\mathcal{P}_{2}}x_{1}+\frac{p_{2}}{\mathcal{P}_{2}}x_{2},\frac{p_{1}}{\mathcal{P}_{2}}y_{1}+\frac{p_{2}}{\mathcal{P}_{2}}y_{2}\right)\leq[\mathcal{F}(x_{1},y_{1})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{1}}{\mathcal{P}_{2}}\right)}[\mathcal{F}(x_{2},y_{2})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{2}}{\mathcal{P}_{2}}\right)}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Suppose (3.2) holds for $n = k$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{k}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{k}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\leq\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{k}}\right)}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Now, let us prove that (3.2) is valid when $n = k+1,$

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k+1}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k+1}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\\ & = \mathcal{F}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}p_{i}x_{i}+\frac{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\left(\frac{p_{k}x_{k}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}+\frac{p_{k+1}x_{k+1}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}\right),\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; \frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}p_{i}y_{i}+\frac{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\left(\frac{p_{k}y_{k}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}+\frac{p_{k+1}y_{k+1}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}\right)\right)\\ &\leq\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{p_{k}x_{k}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}+\frac{p_{k+1}x_{k+1}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}},\frac{p_{k}y_{k}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}+\frac{p_{k+1}y_{k+1}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}\right)\right]^{h\left(\frac{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}\\ &\leq\left(\left[\mathcal{F}(x_{k},y_{k})\right]^{h\left(\frac{p_{k}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}\right)}\left[\mathcal{F}(x_{k+1},y_{k+1})\right]^{h\left(\frac{p_{k+1}}{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}\right)}\right)^{h\left(\frac{p_{k}+p_{k+1}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}\\ &\leq\left[\mathcal{F}(x_{k},y_{k})\right]^{h\left(\frac{p_{k}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}\left[\mathcal{F}(x_{k+1},y_{k+1})\right]^{h\left(\frac{p_{k+1}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}\\ & = \prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k+1}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{k+1}}\right)}. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

This completes the proof.

Remark 2. If $h(\vartheta) = \vartheta,$ then the inequality (3.2) is the Jensen inequality for $\log$ -convex functions.

Now, we prove the Jensen inequality for $\log$ - $h$ -convex IVFs in $\triangle$ .

Theorem 8. Let $p_{i}\in\mathbb{R}^{+}, x_{i}\in[a, b], y_{i}\in[c, d], i = 1, 2, ..., n, \mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ such that $\mathcal{F} = [\underline{F}, \overline{F}]$ . If $h$ is a nonnegative supermultiplicative function and $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{F}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\supseteq\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\right)}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

where $\mathcal{P}_{n} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}$ . If $\mathcal{F}\in SV(\log\mathit{\text{-}}h, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ , then $(3.3)$ is reversed.

Proof. By Theorem 5 and Theorem 7, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{\underline{F}}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\leq\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}[\mathcal{\underline{F}}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\right)} \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{\overline{F}}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\geq\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}[\mathcal{\overline{F}}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\right)}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Thus,

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\\ & = \left[\mathcal{\underline{F}}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}y_{i}\right),\mathcal{\overline{F}}\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i},\frac{1}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}p_{i}y_{i}\right)\right]\\ &\supseteq\left[\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}[\mathcal{\underline{F}}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\right)},\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}[\mathcal{\overline{F}}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\right)}\right]\\ & = \prod\limits_{i = 1}^{n}[\mathcal{F}(x_{i},y_{i})]^{h\left(\frac{{p}_{i}}{\mathcal{P}_{n}}\right)}. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

This completes the proof.

Next, we prove the Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for coordinated $\log$ - $h$ -convex IVFs.

Theorem 9. Let $\mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ and $h:[0, 1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$ be continuous. If $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}ch, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{aligned} &\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\\ &\supseteq \exp\left[\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\left(\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(b-a)}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{ c+d}{2}\right)dx\right.\right.\\ &\left.\left.\; \; \; \; +\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{ a+b}{2},y\right)dy\right)\right]\\ &\supseteq \exp\left[\frac{1}{(b-a)(d-c)}\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx dy\right]\\ &\supseteq \exp\left[\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\left(\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,c)dx+\frac{1}{{\underset{-}-}a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,d)dx\right.\right.\\ &\left.\left.\; \; \; \; +\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(a,y)dy+\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(b,y)dy\right)\right]\\ &\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right]^{\left(\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right)^{2}}.\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.4)

Proof. Since $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\text{-}ch, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\mathcal{F}_{x}\left(\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\\ & = \mathcal{F}_{x}\left(\frac{\vartheta c+(1-\vartheta)d+(1-\vartheta)c+\vartheta d}{2}\right)\\ &\supseteq\left[{\mathcal{F}_{x}(\vartheta c+(1-\vartheta)d)}\right]^{h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\left[{\mathcal{F}_{x}((1-\vartheta) c+\vartheta d)}\right]^{h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}.\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

That is,

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\ln\mathcal{F}_{x}\left(\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\\ &\supseteq h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\ln\left[{\mathcal{F}_{x}(\vartheta c+(1-\vartheta)d)}{\mathcal{F}_{x}((1-\vartheta) c+\vartheta d)}\right].\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Moreover, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\ln\mathcal{F}_{x}\left(\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\\ &\supseteq \left[\int_{0}^{1}\ln{\mathcal{F}_{x}(\vartheta c+(1-\vartheta)d)}d\vartheta+\int_{0}^{1}\ln{\mathcal{F}_{x}((1-\vartheta)c+\vartheta d)}d\vartheta\right]\\ & = \left[\int_{0}^{1}\ln{\mathcal{\underline{F}}_{x}(\vartheta c+(1-\vartheta)d)}d\vartheta,\int_{0}^{1}\ln{\mathcal{\overline{F}}_{x}(\vartheta c+(1-\vartheta)d)}d\vartheta\right]\\ &\; \; \; \; +\left[\int_{0}^{1}\ln{\mathcal{\underline{F}}_{x}((1-\vartheta) c+\vartheta d)}d\vartheta,\int_{0}^{1}\ln{\mathcal{\overline{F}}_{x}((1-\vartheta) c+\vartheta d)}d\vartheta\right]\\ & = 2\left[\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{\underline{F}}_{x}(y)dy,\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{\overline{F}}_{x}(y)dy\right]\\ & = \frac{2}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}_{x}(y)dy. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Similarly, we get

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} \frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}_{x}(y)dy\supseteq \ln\left[\mathcal{F}_{x}(c)\mathcal{F}_{x}(d)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Then

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\ln\mathcal{F}_{x}\left(\frac{ c+d}{2}\right)\supseteq\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}_{x}(y)dy\supseteq \ln\left[\mathcal{F}_{x}(c)\mathcal{F}_{x}(d)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

That is,

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\supseteq\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dy\supseteq \ln\left[\mathcal{F}(x,c)\mathcal{F}(x,d)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Integrating over $[a, b]$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(b-a)}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{ c+d}{2}\right)dx\\&\supseteq\frac{1}{(b-a)(d-c)}\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx dy\\&\supseteq \left[\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,c)dx+\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,d)dx\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Similarly, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{ a+b}{2},y\right)dy\\&\supseteq\frac{1}{(b-a)(d-c)}\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx dy\\&\supseteq \left[\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(a,y)dy+\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(b,y)dy\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Finally, we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{ a+b}{2},\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\\ & = \frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\left[\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(b-a)}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{ c+d}{2}\right)dx+\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{ a+b}{2},y\right)dy\right]\\ &\supseteq\frac{1}{(b-a)(d-c)}\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx dy\\ &\supseteq \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\left[\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,c)dx+\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,d)dx\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; +\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(a,y)dy+\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(b,y)dy\right]\\ &\supseteq\frac{1}{2}\left(\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right)^{2}\left[\ln\mathcal{F}(a,c)+\ln\mathcal{F}(a,d)+\ln\mathcal{F}(b,c)+\ln\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; +\ln\mathcal{F}(a,c)+\ln\mathcal{F}(a,d)+\ln\mathcal{F}(b,c)+\ln\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right]\\ &\supseteq\left(\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right)^{2}\left[\ln\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right].\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

This concludes the proof.

Remark 3. If $\mathcal{\underline{F}} = \mathcal{\overline{F}}$ and $h(\vartheta) = \vartheta$ , then Theorem 9 reduces to Corollary 3.1 of ^[13].

Example 1. Let $[a, b] = [c, d] = [2, 3], h(\vartheta) = \vartheta$ . We define $\mathcal{F}:[2, 3]\times[2, 3]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ by

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}(x,y) = \left[\frac{1}{xy},e^{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}}\right].\\ \end{eqnarray*}$

From Definition 2, $\mathcal{F}(x, y)\in SX(\log\text{-}ch, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ .

Since

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}} = \left[\frac{4}{25},e^{\sqrt{10}}\right],\\ &\exp\left[\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\left(\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(b-a)}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{ c+d}{2}\right)dx\right.\right.\\ &\left.\left.\; \; \; \; +\frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{ a+b}{2},y\right)dy\right)\right] = \left[\frac{8e}{135},e^{\frac{\sqrt{10}}{2}+2\sqrt{3}-\frac{4\sqrt{2}}{3}}\right],\\ \; \; \; \; \; \; \; &\exp\left[\frac{1}{(b-a)(d-c)}\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx dy\right] = \left[\frac{16e^{2}}{729},e^{\frac{4}{3}(3\sqrt{3}-2\sqrt{2})}\right],\\ \; \; \; \; \; \; \; &\exp\left[\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\left(\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,c)dx+\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,d)dx\right.\right.\\ &\left.\left.\; \; \; \; +\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(a,y)dy+\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(b,y)dy\right)\right] = \left[\frac{2\sqrt{6}e}{81},e^{\frac{15\sqrt{3}-5\sqrt{2}}{6}}\right],\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right]^{\left(\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right)^{2}} = \left[\frac{1}{6},e^{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}}\right].\\ \end{eqnarray*}$

It follows that

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left[\frac{4}{25},e^{\sqrt{10}}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{8e}{135},e^{\frac{\sqrt{10}}{2}+2\sqrt{3}-\frac{4\sqrt{2}}{3}}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{16e^{2}}{729},e^{\frac{4}{3}(3\sqrt{3}-2\sqrt{2})}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{2\sqrt{6}e}{81},e^{\frac{15\sqrt{3}-5\sqrt{2}}{6}}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{1}{6},e^{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}}\right] \end{eqnarray*}$

and Theorem 9 is verified.

Theorem 10. Let $\mathcal{F}:\triangle\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ and $h:[0, 1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$ be continuous. If $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\mathit{\text{-}}ch, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{aligned} &\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{4h^{3}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\\ &\supseteq \exp\left[{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(b-a)}}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\left(\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right)dx\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; +{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left(\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},y\right)\right)dy\right]\\ &\supseteq \exp\left[{\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(b-a)}}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\left(\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{3c+d}{4}\right)\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{c+3d}{4}\right)\right)dx\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; +{\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left(\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{3a+b}{4},y\right)\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+3b}{4},y\right)\right)dy\right]\\ &\supseteq \exp\left[\frac{2}{(b-a)(d-c)}\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx dy\right]\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.5)

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned}&\supseteq \exp\left[{\frac{1}{2(b-a)}}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\left(\mathcal{F}(x,c)\mathcal{F}(x,d)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(x,frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right)dx\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; +{\frac{1}{2(d-c)}}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left(\mathcal{F}(a,y)\mathcal{F}(b,y)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},y\right)\right)dy\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right]\\ &\supseteq \exp\left[{\left(\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right)\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(x,c)\mathcal{F}(x,d)\right]dx\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; +{\left(\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right)\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,y)\mathcal{F}(b,y)\right]dy\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}\right]\\ &\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},c\right)\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},d\right)\right.\\ &\left.\; \; \; \; \times\mathcal{F}\left(a,\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\mathcal{F}\left(b,\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right]^{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\left(\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right)^{2}}\\ &\supseteq\left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right]^{2\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]^{2}\left(\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\right)^{2}}. \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Proof. Since $\mathcal{F}\in SX(\log\text{-}ch, \triangle, \mathbb{R}_{\mathcal{I}}^{+})$ , by using Theorem 6 and (2.3), we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}_{y}\left(\frac{a+b}{2}\right)\right]\\ &\supseteq{\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}_{y}\left(\frac{3a+b}{4}\right)\mathcal{F}_{y}\left(\frac{a+3b}{4}\right)\right]\\ &\supseteq\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}_{y}(x)dx\\ &\supseteq{\frac{1}{2}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}_{y}(a)\mathcal{F}_{y}(b)\mathcal{F}_{y}^{2}\left(\frac{a+b}{2}\right)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\\ &\supseteq{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\ln\left[\mathcal{F}_{y}(a)\mathcal{F}_{y}(b)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}.\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

That is,

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},y\right)\right]\\ &\supseteq{\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{3a+b}{4},y\right)\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+3b}{4},y\right)\right]\\ &\supseteq\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx\\ &\supseteq{\frac{1}{2}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,y)\mathcal{F}(b,y)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},y\right)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\\ &\supseteq{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,y)\mathcal{F}(b,y)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}.\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Moreover, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &{\frac{1}{4h^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},y\right)\right]dy\\ &\supseteq{\frac{1}{4h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)(d-c)}}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{3a+b}{4},y\right)\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+3b}{4},y\right)\right]dy\\ &\supseteq\frac{1}{(b-a)(d-c)}\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}(x,y)dx dy\\ &\supseteq{\frac{1}{2(d-c)}}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,y)\mathcal{F}(b,y)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},y\right)\right]dy\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\\ &\supseteq{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,y)\mathcal{F}(b,y)\right]dy\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}.\\ \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

Similarly, we have

We also from (2.2),

$\begin{eqnarray*} \frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\supseteq\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,\frac{c+d}{2}\right)dx,\\ \frac{1}{2h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\supseteq\frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},y\right)dy. \end{eqnarray*}$

Again from (2.3),

$\begin{eqnarray*} \frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,c\right)dx&\; \supseteq{\frac{1}{2}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},c\right)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\\ &\supseteq{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta},\\ \frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(x,d\right)ds&\; \supseteq{\frac{1}{2}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(\frac{a+b}{2},d\right)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\\ &\supseteq{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta},\\ \frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(a,y\right)dy&\; \supseteq{\frac{1}{2}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(a,\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\\ &\supseteq{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta},\\ \frac{1}{d-c}\int_{c}^{d}\ln\mathcal{F}\left(b,y\right)dy&\; \supseteq{\frac{1}{2}}\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\mathcal{F}^{2}\left(b,\frac{c+d}{2}\right)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta\\ &\supseteq{\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]\ln\left[\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right]\int_{0}^{1}h(\vartheta)d\vartheta}\\ \end{eqnarray*}$

and proof is completed.

Example 2. Furthermore, by Example 1, we have

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left[\mathcal{F}(a,c)\mathcal{F}(a,d)\mathcal{F}(b,c)\mathcal{F}(b,d)\right]^{2\left[\frac{1}{2}+h\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]^{2}\left(\int_{0}^{1}h(\theta)d\theta\right)^{2}} = \left[\frac{1}{36},e^{2\sqrt{3}+2\sqrt{2}}\right]. \end{eqnarray*}$

It follows that

$\begin{eqnarray*} \begin{aligned} &\left[\frac{16}{625},e^{2\sqrt{10}}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{64e^{2}}{18225},e^{\frac{4(3\sqrt{3}-2\sqrt{2})+3\sqrt{10}}{3}}\right]\\ &\supseteq\left[\frac{256e^{2}}{72171},e^{\frac{4(3\sqrt{3}-2\sqrt{2})}{3}+\frac{3+\sqrt{11}}{2}}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{256e^{4}}{531441},e^{\frac{8(3\sqrt{3}-2\sqrt{2})}{3}}\right]\\ &\supseteq\left[\frac{16\sqrt{6}e^{2}}{10935},e^{\frac{12\sqrt{3}-8\sqrt{2}+3\sqrt{10}}{6}}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{8e^{2}}{2187},e^{\frac{15\sqrt{3}-5\sqrt{2}}{3}}\right]\\ &\supseteq\left[\frac{\sqrt{6}}{90},e^{\frac{3\sqrt{3}+3\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{10}}{2}}\right]\supseteq\left[\frac{1}{36},e^{2\sqrt{3}+2\sqrt{2}}\right] \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray*}$

and Theorem 10 is verified.

4. Conclusions

We introduced the coordinated log- $h$ -convexity for interval-valued functions, some Jensen type inequalities and Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities are proved. Our results generalize some known inequalities and will be useful in developing the theory of interval integral inequalities and interval convex analysis. The next step in the research direction investigated inequalities for fuzzy-interval-valued functions, and some applications in interval nonlinear programming.

Acknowledgments

The first author was supported in part by the Key Projects of Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (D20192501), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180500) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1508100).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	A. S. Abd-Alzhra, M. S. H. Al-Tamimi, Lossy image compression using hybrid deep learning autoencoder based on k-mean clustering, Design Engin., 2021, 7848–7861.
[2]	M. Akram, G. Ali, J. C. R. Alcantud, A novel group decision-making framework under Pythagorean fuzzy n-soft expert knowledge, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 120 (2023), 105879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105879 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105879
[3]	M. Akram, R. Bibi, M. Deveci, An outranking approach with 2-tuple linguistic fermatean fuzzy sets for multi-attribute group decision-making, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 121 (2023), 105992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105992 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105992
[4]	M. I. Ali, Another view on q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 33 (2018), 2139–2153. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22007 doi: 10.1002/int.22007
[5]	A. Ashraf, K. Ullah, A.Hussain, M. Bari, Interval-valued picture fuzzy maclaurin symmetric mean operator with application in multiple attribute decision-making, Rep. Mech. Eng., 3 (2022), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.22481/intermaths.v3i1.10721 doi: 10.22481/intermaths.v3i1.10721
[6]	K. T. Atanassov, Geometrical interpretation of the elements of the intuitionistic fuzzy objects, Int. J. Bio. Autom., 20 (2016), S27–S42.
[7]	K. T. Atanassov, More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 33 (1989), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(89)90215-7 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90215-7
[8]	K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, In: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Physica, Heidelberg, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3-1
[9]	K. T. Atanassov, On intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory, In: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing (STUDFUZZ, volume 283), Springer, 2012.
[10]	B. Cuong, V. Kreinovich, Picture fuzzy sets, J. Comput. Sci. Cyb., 30 (2014), 409–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032 doi: 10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032
[11]	A. K. Das, C. Granados, IFP-intuitionistic multi fuzzy N-soft set and its induced IFP-hesitant N-soft set in decision-making, J. Amb. Intell. Hum. Comput., 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03677-w doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03677-w
[12]	M. Dasgupta, O. Bandyopadhyay, S. Chatterji, Automated helmet detection for multiple motorcycle riders using CNN, In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technology, IEEE, 2019, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT48419.2019.9066191
[13]	P. Deval, A. Chaudhari, R. Wagh, A. Auto, M. Parma, CNN based face mask detection integrated with digital hospital facilities, Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Commun. Tech., 4 (2021), 492–497.
[14]	L. Dong, X. Gu, X. Wu, H. Liao, An improved multimoora method with combined weights and its application in assessing the innovative ability of universities, Expert Syst., 36 (2019), e12362. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12362 doi: 10.1111/exsy.12362
[15]	M. S. Ejaz, M. R. Islam, M. Sifatullah, A. Sarker, Implementation of principal component analysis on masked and non-masked face recognition, In: 2019 1st international conference on advances in science, engineering and robotics technology (ICASERT), IEEE, 2019, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICASERT.2019.8934543
[16]	F. Feng, M. Liang, H. Fujita, R. R. Yager, X. Liu, Lexicographic orders of intuitionistic fuzzy values and their relationships, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020166 doi: 10.3390/math7020166
[17]	R. Girshick, Fast R-CNN, In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2015, 1440–1448.
[18]	K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, Mask R-CNN, In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2017, 2961–2969.
[19]	M. R. Khan, K. Ullah, Q. Khan, Multi-attribute decision-making using archimedean aggregation operator in t-spherical fuzzy environment, Rep. Mech. Eng., 4 (2023), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme20031012023k doi: 10.31181/rme20031012023k
[20]	K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 20 (1986), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
[21]	K. Lin, H. Zhao, J. Lv, C. Li, X. Liu, R. Chen, et al., Face detection and segmentation based on improved mask R-CNN, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9242917 doi: 10.1155/2020/9242917
[22]	P. D. Liu, P. Wang, Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 33 (2018), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21927 doi: 10.1002/int.21927
[23]	T. Mahmood, J. Ahmmad, J. Gwak, N. Jan, Prioritization of thermal energy techniques by employing picture fuzzy soft power average and geometric aggregation operators, Sci. Rep., 13 (2023), 1707. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27387-9 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27387-9
[24]	T. Mahmood, K. Ullah, Q. Khan, N. Jan, An approach toward decision-making and medical diagnosis problems using the concept of spherical fuzzy sets, Neural Comput. Appl., 31 (2019), 7041–7053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3521-2 doi: 10.1007/s00521-018-3521-2
[25]	N. A. Mohamed, M. S. H. Al-Tamimi, Image fusion using a convolutional neural network, Solid State Technol., 63 (2020).
[26]	K. Naeem, M. Riaz, F. Karaaslan, Some novel features of pythagorean m-polar fuzzy sets with applications, Complex Intell. Syst., 7 (2021), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00219-3 doi: 10.1007/s40747-020-00219-3
[27]	M. Narang, M. C. Joshi, K. Bisht, A. Pal, Stock portfolio selection using a new decision-making approach based on the integration of fuzzy cocoso with heronian mean operator, Decis. Making Appl. Manag. Eng., 5 (2022), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0310022022n doi: 10.31181/dmame0310022022n
[28]	M. Rezaei, E. Ravanbakhsh, E. Namjoo, M. Haghighat, Assessing the effect of image quality on SSD and faster R-CNN networks for face detection, In: 2019 27th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), IEEE, 2019, 1589–1594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2019.8786526
[29]	M. Riaz, H. M. A. Farid, F. Karaaslan, Linear Diophantine fuzzy aggregation operators with multi-criteria decision-making, J. Comput. Cogn. Eng., 2022. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCCE3202420 doi: 10.47852/bonviewJCCE3202420
[30]	M. Riaz, M. R. Hashmi, Linear diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision-making problems, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 5417–5439. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190550 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-190550
[31]	J. R. S. Veluswami, S. Prakash, N. Parekh, Face mask detection using SSDNET and lightweight custom CNN, SSRN Electron. J., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3882472 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3882472
[32]	X. L. Wu, C. Zhang, L. S. Jiang, H. C. Liao, An integrated method with promethee and conflict analysis for qualitative and quantitative decision-making: Case study of site selection for wind power plants, Cogn. Comput., 12 (2020), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-019-09675-7 doi: 10.1007/s12559-019-09675-7
[33]	Z. S. Xu, An overview of methods for determining owa weights, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 20 (2005), 843–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20097 doi: 10.1002/int.20097
[34]	R. R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, In: 2013 joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), IEEE, 2013, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
[35]	R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 22 (2013), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
[36]	R. R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2016), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
[37]	L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[38]	Q. Zhang, J. H. Hu, J. F. Feng, A. Liu, Y. L. Li, New similarity measures of pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 138192–138202. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942766 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942766

This article has been cited by:

1.	Hajar F. Ismael, Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Hasan Bulut, Wei Gao, Instability modulation and novel optical soliton solutions to the Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation with M-fractional, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-04581-7
2.	Nauman Raza, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty, Traveling wave structures and analysis of bifurcation and chaos theory for Biswas–Milovic Model in conjunction with Kudryshov’s law of refractive index, 2023, 287, 00304026, 171085, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171085
3.	Hakima Khudher Ahmed, Hajar Farhan Ismael, Optical soliton solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with higher-order dispersion arise in nonlinear optics, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 105276, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad78c3
4.	Nirman Bhowmike, Zia Ur Rehman, Zarmeena Naz, Muhammad Zahid, Sultan Shoaib, Yasar Amin, Non-linear electromagnetic wave dynamics: Investigating periodic and quasi-periodic behavior in complex engineering systems, 2024, 184, 09600779, 114984, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114984
5.	Saumya Ranjan Jena, Itishree Sahu, A novel approach for numerical treatment of traveling wave solution of ion acoustic waves as a fractional nonlinear evolution equation on Shehu transform environment, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 085231, 10.1088/1402-4896/ace6de
6.	Ri Zhang, Muhammad Shakeel, Nasser Bin Turki, Nehad Ali Shah, Sayed M Tag, Novel analytical technique for mathematical model representing communication signals: A new travelling wave solutions, 2023, 51, 22113797, 106576, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106576
7.	Exact Solutions of Beta-Fractional Fokas-Lenells Equation via Sine-Cosine Method, 2023, 16, 20710216, 10.14529/mmp230201

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)