Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Diverse optical solitons solutions of the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via two altered methods

  • Received: 09 December 2022 Revised: 31 January 2023 Accepted: 06 February 2023 Published: 14 March 2023
  • MSC : 5C05, 35Q53, 76B25

  • This work evaluates the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation in the sense of truncated M- fractional derivative and analyzes its soliton solutions and other new solutions in the appearance of a detuning factor in non-linear optics. The multiple, bright, and bright-dark soliton solutions of this equation are obtained using the modified (G/G2) and (1/G)expansion methods. The equation is evaluated with Kerr law, quadratic –cubic law and parabolic law non-linear fibers. To shed light on the behavior of solitons, the graphical illustrations in the form of 2D and 3D of the obtained solutions are represented for different values of various parameters. All of the solutions have been verified by substitution into their corresponding equations with the aid of a symbolic software package. The various forms of solutions to the aforementioned nonlinear equation that arises in fluid dynamics and nonlinear processes are presented. Moreover, we guarantee that all the solutions are new and an excellent contribution in the existing literature of solitary wave theory.

    Citation: Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, Sayed M Eldin, Asim Zafar. Diverse optical solitons solutions of the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via two altered methods[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11480-11497. doi: 10.3934/math.2023581

    Related Papers:

    [1] Amjad Hussain, Muhammad Khubaib Zia, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Velusamy Vijayakumar, Ilyas Khan . Lie analysis, conserved vectors, nonlinear self-adjoint classification and exact solutions of generalized $ \left(N+1\right) $-dimensional nonlinear Boussinesq equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13139-13168. doi: 10.3934/math.2022725
    [2] Huiqing Wang, Md Nur Alam, Onur Alp İlhan, Gurpreet Singh, Jalil Manafian . New complex wave structures to the complex Ginzburg-Landau model. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8883-8894. doi: 10.3934/math.2021515
    [3] Xiao-Yu Li, Yu-Lan Wang, Zhi-Yuan Li . Numerical simulation for the fractional-in-space Ginzburg-Landau equation using Fourier spectral method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2407-2418. doi: 10.3934/math.2023124
    [4] Nasser Bin Turki, Sharief Deshmukh . Sufficient conditions for triviality of Ricci solitons. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1346-1357. doi: 10.3934/math.2024066
    [5] Abdulah A. Alghamdi . Analytical discovery of dark soliton lattices in (2+1)-dimensional generalized fractional Kundu-Mukherjee-Naskar equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 23100-23127. doi: 10.3934/math.20241123
    [6] Harivan R. Nabi, Hajar F. Ismael, Nehad Ali Shah, Wajaree Weera . W-shaped soliton solutions to the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation of ion-acoustic waves in (3+1)-dimensions arise in a magnetized plasma. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4467-4486. doi: 10.3934/math.2023222
    [7] Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Mirfa Dawood, Muhammad Abbas, Dumitru Baleanu . Solitary wave solutions to Gardner equation using improved tan$ \left(\frac{\Omega(\Upsilon)}{2}\right) $-expansion method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4390-4406. doi: 10.3934/math.2023219
    [8] M. TarikulIslam, M. AliAkbar, M. Abul Kalam Azad . Traveling wave solutions in closed form for some nonlinear fractional evolution equations related to conformable fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2018, 3(4): 625-646. doi: 10.3934/Math.2018.4.625
    [9] Ikram Ullah, Muhammad Bilal, Javed Iqbal, Hasan Bulut, Funda Turk . Single wave solutions of the fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation in space-time with accuracy via the beta derivative and mEDAM approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 672-693. doi: 10.3934/math.2025030
    [10] Choonkil Park, XiaoYing Wu . Homomorphism-derivation functional inequalities in C*-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4482-4493. doi: 10.3934/math.2020288
  • This work evaluates the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation in the sense of truncated M- fractional derivative and analyzes its soliton solutions and other new solutions in the appearance of a detuning factor in non-linear optics. The multiple, bright, and bright-dark soliton solutions of this equation are obtained using the modified (G/G2) and (1/G)expansion methods. The equation is evaluated with Kerr law, quadratic –cubic law and parabolic law non-linear fibers. To shed light on the behavior of solitons, the graphical illustrations in the form of 2D and 3D of the obtained solutions are represented for different values of various parameters. All of the solutions have been verified by substitution into their corresponding equations with the aid of a symbolic software package. The various forms of solutions to the aforementioned nonlinear equation that arises in fluid dynamics and nonlinear processes are presented. Moreover, we guarantee that all the solutions are new and an excellent contribution in the existing literature of solitary wave theory.



    Solitons are currently being examined in a very efficient manner. They occur by the elimination of dispersive effects when they propagate. Soliton is a solution to the weak massive dispersive nonlinear partial differential equation (NLPDE) that can be found in mathematics, physics, biology, engineering finance as well as fractional dynamics. There are several models that are under consideration today for the exploration of soliton solutions [17]. One such model that has been taken into account for many years is the complex Ginzburg-Landau (CGL) model. Complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGLE) is one of the most important models to describe optical phenomena [810]. In order to better analyze the complex optical phenomena and study their essence, the best ways are to find exact traveling solutions to the CGLE describing the nonlinear optical phenomena. In recent years, a variety of powerful mathematical approaches have been applied to derive the exact soliton solutions of CGLE. Liu et al. [11] obtained the kink and periodic wave solutions by using the Hirota bilinear method. Inc et al. [12] obtained the bright and singular soliton solutions for the non-linearity term of the CGL model by utilizing the Sine-Gordon method. Arnous et al. [13] observed the optical soliton solution by using the modified simple equation method. The quadratic and multiple solitons of n-dimension CGLE were gained by Khater et al. [14] using the Sine-Gordon expansion method. Das et al. [15] used the F expansion method to get bright and dark solitons of CGLE.

    Recently, the study of physical models with fractional derivatives has attracted a great deal of attention since some materials are well-described as fractal media. To investigate such models, several definitions of fractional derivatives such as Caputo [16], Caputo-Fabrizio [17], Riemann Liouville [18], conformable fractional derivative [19], Beta derivative [20] and Grunwald-Letnikov [21] have been introduced. It is found that fractional derivatives do not satisfy some basic properties of derivatives, such as the product rule and chain rule. Recently, Sousa and Oliveira [22] developed a local derivative called a new truncated M-fractional derivative where this fractional calculus satisfies all the properties of derivatives like the chain rule. Also, this derivative has some appealing consequences in diverse areas including fluid mechanics, optical physics, chaos theory, biological models, disease analysis, circuit analysis and others.

    The present study sheds light on the space-time fractional CGLE [23,24]. The space-time fractional CGL model addressed here is described by

    iA0Dα,βM,tu+aA0D2α,βM,xu+cH(|u|2)u=1|u|2u{δA0D2α,βM,x(|u|2)|u|2N(A0Dα,βM,x(|u|2))2}+Pu, (1)

    where α and β are the fractional parameters, x denotes distance along the fiber, t denotes time in dimensionless form, a,c and P are valued constants, the symbol indicates the complex conjugate of the function u(x,t) and H is a real-valued algebraic function and its smoothness is possessed by a complex function H(|u|2)u:CC. Now, taking C as a complex plane to be a two dimensional linear space R2, H(|u|2)u is k times continuously differentiable real-valued function [25]:

    H(|u|2)uUp,q=1Ck((q,q)×(p,p);R2), (2)

    where δ=2N, then Eq (1) reduces to

    iA0Dα,βM,tu+aA0D2α,βM,xu+cH(|u|2)u=N|u|2u{2A0D2α,βM,x(|u|2)|u|2(A0Dα,βM,x(|u|2))2}+Pu. (3)

    Equation (2) is one of the extremely many models that govern pulse propagation dynamics through optical fibers for transcontinental and transoceanic distances. In [26], Sulaiman et al. studied the conformable time-space fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via the extended Sine-Gordon equation expansion method. In [27], Abdou et al. considered the fractional complex Ginzburg- Landau equation by employing the extended Jacobi elliptic function expansion method. In [28], Arshed constructed the soliton solutions to the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation by utilizing the exp (ϕ(ξ))expansion method. In [29], Ghanbari and Gomez-Aguilar employed the generalized exponential rational functional method to study the periodic and hyperbolic soliton solutions conformable Ginzburg-Landau equation. In [30], Lu et al. studied the (2+1)- dimensional fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via the fractional Riccati method and fractional bifunction method. In [31], Hussain and Jhangeer obtained the optical solitons of fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with conformable, beta, and M-truncated derivatives. In [32] Akram et al. studied the optical solitons for the fractional CGLE with Kerr law nonlinearity using different fractional differential operators. In [33], Sadaf et al. obtained the dark, bright, complexion, singular and periodic optical solitons of fractional order complex Ginzburg–Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity implementing conformable, beta and M-truncated derivatives. Zafar et al. in [34] acquired the kink, bright, W-shaped bright and dark solitons of fractional CGL model using the modified Exp-function and Kudryshov methods. The model is examined with quadratic-cubic law, Kerr law, and parabolic laws non-linear fibers.

    The major concern of this existing study is to utilize the novel meanings of fractional-order derivative, named truncated M-fractional derivative [35,36], for space-time fractional CGLE, and to find the novel soliton solutions and other solutions in the appearance of a detuning factor in non-linear optics by employ two modified methods, the (1/G)expansion method [37] and the modified (G/G2)expansion method [3840]. According to the best authors' knowledge, such type of investigation has not been done before [3134] for the considered fractional CGL model and thus it is interesting to report here. Further, under the given constraint conditions, we obtained the dynamic behavior of solitary wave solutions. Such solutions are important for further studies of this model due to their significant applications in nonlinear optics.

    The rest of the paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, the truncated M-fractional derivative and its properties are presented. In Section 3, a truncated M- fractional derivative is applied on the fractional CGLE. In Sections 4 and 5, exact solutions of fractional CGLE are obtained with the Kerr law, quadratic-cubic law and parabolic law nonlinearity. The graphical representation of our obtained solutions in given in Section 6. In the end, conclusions are announced in Section 7.

    Definition 2.1: The truncated Mittag-Leffler function [22,39] with one parameter is defined as follows:

    iEβ(z)=ik=0zkΓ(βk+1), (4)

    in which β>0 and zC. It is defined in the sense of non-fuzzy concept as given below.

    Definition 2.2: Suppose that g:[0,)R and α(0,1), the truncated derivative g of order α is defined by

    iTα,βMg(t)=limε0g(t+iEβ(εtα))g(t)ε,fort>0andiEβ(),β>0. (5)

    Properties 2.1: Suppose that f is a differentiable function of α order at t0>0 with α(0,1] and β>0. Then f is continuous at t0.

    Properties 2.2: If α(0,1],β>0,g,h are differentiable up to α order at t0>0, then:

    (1) iTα,βM(pg+qh)=piTα,βM(g)+qiTα,βM(h), where p,q are real constants;

    (2) iTα,βM(tv)=vtvα,vR;

    (3) iTα,βM(gh)=giTα,βM(h)+hiTα,βM(g);

    (4) iTα,βM(gh)=giTα,βM(h)hiTα,βM(g)h2;

    (5) iTα,βM(g)(t)=t1αΓ(β+1)dgdt;

    (6) iTα,βM(goh)(t)=f(h(t))iTα,βMh(t).

    To solve Eq (3), we consider the following traveling wave transformation

    u(x,t)=U(η)eiΘ(x,t),η=Γ(β+1)α(xαvtα), (6)
    Θ(x,t)=Γ(β+1)α(kxαvwtα)+ε,

    where u(x,t), w,k,v,Θ(x,t) and ε represents the pulse shape, wave number, frequency, speed, phase component and phase function of soliton respectively.

    Substituting Eq (6) into Eq (3), an ordinary differential equation is obtained, whose real and imaginary parts respectively are:

    (a4N)U(w+ak2+P)U+cH(U2)U=0, (7)

    and

    v=2ak. (8)

    Now, the focus of the study is to consider Eq (7) with three shapes of non-linear fibers, namely, the Kerr law, the quadratic-cubic law and the parabolic law nonlinearity.

    Let us consider the nonlinear partial differential equation (NLPDE) is given by

    Q=(u,ut,ux,uux,utt,uxt,uuxx,...) (9)

    where u=u(x,t) is an unknown function, Q is a polynomial depending on u(x,t) and its various partial derivatives.

    Step 1: By suitable wave transformation

    η=(xvt)u(x,t)=U(η). (10)

    Here, v is the wave speed. The wave variable allows us to reduce Eq (10) into a nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE) for U=U(η):

    R=(U,U,U,U,...) (11)

    Step 2: Extend the solution of Eq (11) in the following form. Let the modified (G/G2)-equation is

    U(η)=mi=0ai(GG2)i, (12)

    where ai(i=0,1,2,3,...,m) are constants and find to be later. It is important that ai0.

    The function G=G(η) satisfies the following Riccati equation,

    (GG2)=λ1(GG2)2+λ0, (13)

    where λ0 and λ1 are constants. We gain the below solutions to Eq (13) due to different conditions of λ0:

    When λ0λ1<0,

    (GG2)=|λ0λ1|λ1+|λ0λ1|2[C1sinh(λ0λ1η)+C2cosh(λ0λ1η)C1cosh(λ0λ1η)+C2sinh(λ0λ1η)]. (14)

    When λ0λ1>0,

    (GG2)=λ0λ1[C1cos(λ0λ1η)+C2sin(λ0λ1η)C1sin(λ0λ1η)C2cos(λ0λ1η)]. (15)

    When λ0=0 and λ10,

    (G'G2)=C1λ1(C1η+C2), (16)

    where C1 and C2 are arbitrary constant.

    Substituting Eq (12) into Eq (11) along with Eq (13) and apply symbolic computations results in an algebraic system whose solution leads to optical solitons of the nonlinear partial differential Eq (9).

    In this case, when we take

    H(U)=U. (17)

    This appears in water waves and in nonlinear fiber optics Biswas et al. [41]. Then Eq (3) becomes:

    iA0Dα,βM,tu+aA0D2α,βM,xu+c(|u|2)u=N|u|2u{2A0D2α,βM,x(|u|2)|u|2(A0Dα,βM,x(|u|2))2}+Pu. (18)

    Thus; Eq (18) changes to

    (a4N)U(w+ak2+P)U+cU3=0. (19)

    According to the balance principle, we obtain m=1. Putting m=1 to Eq (12), then we get

    U(η)=a0+a1(GG2). (20)

    Here, a0 and a1 are unknown parameters. By substituting Eq (19) with Eq (13) into Eq (19) and summing up all coefficients of same order of (G/G2), we get the algebraic expressions involving a0,a1 and other parameters as follows:

    (GG2)3:a13c+2aa1λ128a1Nλ12=0,(GG2)2:3a0a12c=0,(GG2)1:3a02a1caa1k2a1Pa1w+2aa1λ0λ18a1Nλ0λ1=0,(GG2)0:a03caa0k2a0Pa0w=0. (21)

    Solving the system of algebraic equations in (21) with the help of software MATHEMATICA, we attain the following solutions:

    a0=0, a1=±2λ14Nac,w= ak2P+2aλ0λ18Nλ0λ1. (22)

    Now we use Eqs (14)–(16), (20) and (22) into Eq (6) and set to the below cases. Ifλ0λ1 < 0, then

    u1(x,t)=2λ14Nac(|λ0λ1|λ1|λ0λ12[C1sinh(λ0λ1η)+C2cosh(λ0λ1η)C1cosh(λ0λ1η)+C2sinh(λ0λ1η)])eiΘ(x,t). (23)

    If λ0λ1>0,then

    u2(x,t)=±2λ14Nac(λ0λ1[C1cos(λ0λ1η)+C2sin(λ0λ1η)C1sin(λ0λ1η)C2cos(λ0λ1η)])eiΘ(x,t). (24)

    This type of nonlinearity was studied in [42]. In this case, we take

    H(U)=c1U+c2U. (25)

    Then Eq (3) becomes:

    iA0Dα,βM,tu+aA0D2α,βM,xu+(c1|u|+c2|u|2)u=N|u|2u{2A0D2α,βM,x(|u|2)|u|2(A0Dα,βM,x(|u|2))2}+Pu. (26)

    Thus; Eq (26) changes to

    (a4N)U(w+ak2+P)U+c1U2+c2U3=0. (27)

    According to the balance principle, we obtain m=1. Putting m=1 into Eq (12), we get Eq (20).By putting Eq (20) with Eq (13) into Eq (27) and summing up all coefficients of same order of (G/G2), we get the algebraic expressions involving a0,a1 and other parameters as:

    (GG2)3:a13c2+2aa1λ128a1Nλ12=0,(GG2)2:a12c1+3a0a12c2=0,(GG2)1:2a0a1c1+3a02a1c2aa1k2a1Pa1w+2aa1λ0λ18a1Nλ0λ1=0,(GG2)0:a02c1+a03c2aa0k2a0Pa0w=0. (28)

    Now with the use of MATHEMATICA, we get the below solution:

    a0=c13c2, a1=±ic1λ13c2λ0,w=2c129ac2k29c2P9c2,N=c12+18ac2λ0λ172c2λ0λ1. (29)

    Now we use Eqs (14)–(16), (20) and (29) into Eq (6) and set to the below cases. Ifλ0λ1 < 0,  then

    u1(x,t)=c13c2(1iλ1λ0(|λ0λ1|λ1|λ0λ12[C1sinh(λ0λ1η)+C2cosh(λ0λ1η)C1cosh(λ0λ1η)+C2sinh(λ0λ1η)]))eiΘ(x,t). (30)

    If λ0λ1>0, then

    u2(x,t)=(c13c2(1iλ1λ0([C1cos(λ0λ1η)+C2sin(λ0λ1η)C1sin(λ0λ1η)C2cos(λ0λ1η)])))eiΘ(x,t). (31)

    This type of nonlinearity can be found in [43]. In this case, we take

    H(U)=c3U+c4U2. (32)

    Then Eq (3) becomes:

    iA0Dα,βM,tu+aA0D2α,βM,xu+(c3|u|2+c2|u|4)u=N|u|2u{2A0D2α,βM,x(|u|2)|u|2(A0Dα,βM,x(|u|2))2}+Pu. (33)

    Thus; Eq (33) changes to

    (a4N)U(w+ak2+P)U+c3U3+c4U5=0. (34)

    Substituting

    U(η)=(u(η))12. (35)

    Then Eq (34) converts to

    4(w+ak2+P)u24c3u34c4U4+(a4N)(u)22(a4N)uu=0. (36)

    According to the balance principle, we obtain m=1. Putting m=1 into Eq (12), we get Eq (20). By putting Eq (20) with Eq (13) into Eq (36) and summing up all coefficients of same order of (G/G2), we get the algebraic expressions involving a0,a1 and other parameters as:

    (GG2)4:4a14c43aa12λ12+12a12Nλ12=0,(GG2)3:4a13c316a0a13c44aa0a1λ12+16a0a1Nλ12=0,(GG2)2:12a0a12c324a02a12c4+4aa12k2+4a12P+4a12w2aa12λ0λ1+8a12Nλ0λ1=0,(GG2)1:12a02a1c316a03a1c4+8aa0a1k2+8a0a1P+8a0a1w4aa0a1λ0λ1+16a0a1Nλ0λ1=0,(GG2)0:4a03c34a04c4+4aa02k2+4a02P+4a02w+aa12λ124a12Nλ02=0. (37)

    Now with the use of MATHEMATICA, we get the below solution:

    a0=3c38c4, a1=±3ic3λ18c4λ0,w= 3c3216ac4k216c4P16c4,N=3c32+16ac4λ0λ164c4λ0λ1. (38)

    Now we use Eqs (20), (38) and (14)–(16) into Eq (6) and set to the below cases. Ifλ0λ1 < 0,  then

    u1(x,t)=3c38c4(1iλ1λ0(|λ0λ1|λ1|λ0λ12[C1sinh(λ0λ1η)+C2cosh(λ0λ1η)C1cosh(λ0λ1η)+C2sinh(λ0λ1η)]))eiΘ(x,t). (39)

    If λ0λ1>0, then

    u2(x,t)=3c38c4(1iλ1λ0([C1cos(λ0λ1η)+C2sin(λ0λ1η)C1sin(λ0λ1η)C2cos(λ0λ1η)]))eiΘ(x,t). (40)

    Here, we will describe the basic steps of (1/G)expansion method [37].

    Step 1: Consider Eqs (9)–(11).

    Step 2: Extend the solution of Eq (11) in the following form

    U(η)=mi=0ai(1G)i, (41)

    where G=G(η) and satisfies the following linear ordinary differential equation which is

    G(η)+λG(η)+μ=0, (42)

    where ai(i=1,....,m),λ and μ are constants to be determined. The positive integer m can be obtained by using the homogenous balance between the highest order derivatives and the nonlinear term appearing in Eq. (11). Additionally, the solution of the differential equation given in Eq (42) is

    G(η)=C1eλημλ+C2, (43)

    where C1 and C2 are arbitrary integration constants.(1/G) can be expressed as

    (1G)=λμ+λC1[cosh(λη)sinh(λη)]. (44)

    Step 3: Substituting Eq (41) into Eq (11) along with Eq (42) and apply symbolic computations results in an algebraic system whose solution leads to optical solitons of the nonlinear partial differential Eq (9).

    Consider Eqs (17)–(19). By applying balance principle on Eq (19), we obtain m=1. Putting m=1 in Eq (41), then we get

    U(η)=a0+a1(1G). (45)

    Here a0 and a1 are unknown parameters. By putting Eq (45) with Eq (42) into Eq (19) and summing up all the coefficients of same order of (1/G), we get the algebraic expression involving a0,a1 and other parameters.

    (1G)3:a13c+2aa1μ28a1Nμ2=0,(1G)2:3a0a12c+3aa1λμ12a1Nλμ=0,(1G)1:3a02a1caa1k2a1Pa1w+aa1λ24a1Nλ2=0,(1G)0:a03ca0Pa0waa0k2=0. (46)

    Now with the use of MATHEMATICA Aid, we get:

    a0=2λ4Na2c, a1=2μ4Nac,w= 2ak22Paλ2+4Nλ22. (47)

    Following the above solutions, we get the hyperbolic solution:

    u1(x,t)=(2λ4Nac(12+μμ+λC1[cosh(λη)sinh(λη)]))eiΘ(x,t). (48)

    Consider Eqs (25)–(27). By applying balance principle on Eq (27), we obtain m=1. Putting m=1 in Eq (41), and then we get Eq (45). By putting Eq (45) with Eq (42) into Eq (27) and summing up all the coefficients of same order of (1/G), we get the algebraic expression involving a0,a1 and other parameters as:

    (1G)3:a13c2+2aa1μ28a1Nμ2=0,(1G)2:a12c1+3a0a12c2+3aa1λμ12a1Nλμ=0,(1G)1:2a0a1c1+3a02a1c2aa1k2a1Pa1w+aa1λ24a1Nλ2=0,(1G)0:a02c1+a03c2a0Pa0waa0k2=0. (49)

    Now, with the use of MATHEMATICA Aid, we get the below solution:

    a0=2c13c2, a1=2c1μ3c2λ,w= 2c129ac2k29c2P9c2,N=136(9a+2c12c2λ2). (50)

    Following the above solutions, we get the hyperbolic solution:

    u1(x,t)=(2c13c2(1+μμ+λC1[cosh(λη)sinh(λη)]))eiΘ(x,t). (51)

    Consider Eqs (32), (33) and (36). By applying the balance principle on Eq (36), we obtain m=1. Putting m=1 to Eq (41), and then we get Eq (45).By putting Eq (45) with Eq (42) into Eq (36) and summing up all the coefficients of same order of (1/G), we get the algebraic expression involving a0,a1 and other parameters as:

    (1G)4:4a14c43aa12μ2+12a12Nμ2=0,(1G)3:4a13c316a0a13c44aa12λμ+16a12Nλμ4aa0a1μ+16a0a1Nμ2=0,(1G)2:12a0a12c324a02a12c4+4aa12k2+4a12P+4a12waa12λ2+4a12Nλ26aa0a1λμ+24a0a1Nλμ=0,(1G)1:12a02a1c316a03a1c4+8aa0a1k2+8a0a1P+8a0a1w2aa0a1λ2+8a0a1Nλ2=0,(1G)0:4a03c34a04c4+4a02P+4a02w+4aa02k2=0. (52)

    Now with the use of MATHEMATICA Aid, we get the below solution:

    a0=3c34c4, a1=3c3μ4c4λ,w= 3c3216ac4k216c4P16c4,N=116(4a+3c32c4λ2). (53)

    Following the above solutions, we get the hyperbolic solution:

    u1(x,t)=(3c34c4(1+μμ+λC1[cosh(λη)sinh(λη)]))eiΘ(x,t). (54)

    This section deals with a graphical demonstration of the obtained results and provides a brief discussion on the effect of fractional parameter α. Figure 1c depicts the physical appearance of the multiple soliton solutions of Eq (23) and Figures 1(a, b)demonstrates the effect of fractional parameter α and time t along fixed space parameter. A graphical illustration of the periodic soliton solution of Eq (24)can be viewed in Figure 2(c), and its 2D fractional and time parameters effects are depicted in Figure 2(a, b). Figures 3(c), 4(c), 5(c), 6(c), 7(c) and 8(c) highlight the physical appearance of the bright soliton solution of Eq (31), singular soliton solution of Eq (39), bright-dark soliton solution of Eq (40), bright singular soliton solution of Eq (48), smooth antiking soliton solution of Eq (51) and steep antiking soliton solution of Eq (54) respectively, and their respective 2D fractional and time parameter effects are given in Figues 3(a, b), 4(a, b), 5(a, b), 6(a, b), 7(a, b) and 8(a, b).

    Figure 1.  The 2D and 3D profiles of multiple soliton shape of Eq. (23) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ε=1,a=0.05,N=1,P=0.2,c=0.05,λ0=1.5,λ1=0.5,C1=1,C2=0.2.
    Figure 2.  The 2D and 3D profiles of periodic soliton shape of Eq (24) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ε=1,a=0.05,N=1,P=0.2,c=0.05,λ0=1.5,λ1=0.5,C1=1,C2=0.2.
    Figure 3.  The 2D and 3D profiles of bright soliton shape of Eq (31) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ϵ=1,a=0.05,P=0.2,c1=0.3,c2=0.5,λ0=1.5,λ1=0.5,C1=0.5,C2=0.8.
    Figure 4.  The 2D and 3D profiles of bright singular soliton shape of Eq (39) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ε=1,a=0.05,P=0.2,c3=0.03,c4=0.05,λ0=0.02,λ1=2.5,C1=0.5,C2=1.
    Figure 5.  The 2D and 3D profiles of bright and dark soliton shape of Eq (40) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ε=1,a=0.05,P=0.2,c3=0.03,c4=0.05,λ0=0.02,λ1=2.5,C1=0.5,C2=1.
    Figure 6.  The 2D and 3D profiles of bright singular soliton shape of Eq (48) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ε=1,a=0.05,P=0.2,c=0.02,μ=0.2,λ=0.5,C1=0.1.
    Figure 7.  The 2D and 3D profiles of smooth antiking shape soliton of Eq (51) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ε=1,a=0.05,P=0.2,c1=0.2,c2=0.5,μ=0.2,λ=0.5,C1=0.2.
    Figure 8.  The 2D and 3D profiles of steep antiking shape soliton of Eq (54) when β=0.5,ν=0.3,k=0.1,w=0.2,ε=1,a=0.05,P=0.2,c3=2,c4=0.5,μ=0.2,λ=0.5,C1=0.2.

    In this study, we have used a truncated M-fractional derivative to find the optical solutions of the fractional CGLE. We carried out this objective by adopting a specific wave transformation to change the fractional CGLE to a nonlinear ODE of second order such that the resultant ODE could be solved by employing the modified (G/G2) and (1/G) expansion methods. These methods restored the bright, multiple and bright-dark solitons for Kerr law, quadratic-cubic law and parabolic law nonlinearities. To describe the physical phenomena of the space-time fractional CGLE, some solutions are plotted in the form of (3D surface graphs and 2D line plots) by assigning the specific value to the parameters under the constrained conditions. Compared with other work [3134], our solutions have not been reported in the former literature. Moreover, these methods are very efficient and powerful in finding the soliton solutions for the nonlinear fractional differential equations, and the obtained solutions can help us to more deeply explain the nonlinear dynamics of optical soliton propagations. Also, these methods can be applied to many NLPDEs in mathematical physics. Finally, our solutions have been checked using the software MATHEMATICA by putting them back into the original equation.

    This work was partially funded by the research center of the Future University in Egypt, 2022.

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] L. V. C. Hoan, S. Owyed, M. Inc, L. Ouahid, M. A. Abdou, Y. M.Chu, New explicit optical solitons of fractional nonlinear evolution equation via three different methods, Results Phys., 18 (2020), 103209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103209 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103209
    [2] K. Hosseini, K.Sadri, M. Mirzazadeh, Y. M. Chu, A. Ahmadian, B. A. Pansera, et al., A high-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the weak non-local nonlinearity and its optical solitons, Results Phys., 23 (2021), 104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104035 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104035
    [3] N. Raza, A. Jhangeer, S. Arshed, A. R. Butt, Y. M. Chu, Dynamical analysis and phase portraits of two-mode waves in different media, Results Phys., 19 (2020), 103650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103650 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103650
    [4] Q. Zhang, J. S. Hesthaven, Z. Z Sun, Y. Ren, Pointwise error estimate in difference setting for the two-dimensional nonlinear fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, Adv. Comput. Math., 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-021-09862-x doi: 10.1007/s10444-021-09862-x
    [5] Q. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. W. Sun, A three-level finite difference method with preconditioning technique for two-dimensional nonlinear fractional complex Ginzburg–Landau equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 389 (2021), 113355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.113355 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113355
    [6] H. Rezazadeh, N. Ullah, L. Akinyemi, A. Shah, S. M. M. Alizamin, Y.M.Chu, et al., Optical soliton solutions of the generalized non-autonomous nonlinear Schrödinger equations by the new Kudryashov's method, Results Phys., 24 (2021), 104179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104179 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104179
    [7] S. Abbagari, A. Houwe, Y. Saliou, Douvagaï, Y. M. Chu, M. Inc, et al., Analytical survey of the predator–prey model with fractional derivative order, AIP Adv., 11 (2021), 035127. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038826 doi: 10.1063/5.0038826
    [8] M. S. Osman, B. Ghanbari, J. A. T. Machado, New complex waves in nonlinear optics based on the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 20. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12442-4 doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12442-4
    [9] Y. M. Chu, M. A. Shallal, S. Mehdi Mirhosseini-Alizamini, H. Rezazadeh, S. Javeed, D. Baleanu, Application of modified extended Tanh technique for solving complex Ginzburg-Landau equation considering Kerr law nonlinearity, CMC Comput. Mater. Con., 66 (2020), 1369–1378.
    [10] W. J. Zhu, Y. H. Xia, Y. Z. Bai, Traveling wave solutions of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity, Appl. Math. Comput., 382 (2020), 125342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125342 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125342
    [11] W. Liu, W. Yu, C. Yang, M. Liu, Y. Zhang, M. Lei, Analytic solutions for the generalized complex Ginzburg-Landau equation in fiber lasers, Nonlinear Dyn., 89 (2017), 2933–2939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3636-5 doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3636-5
    [12] M. Inc, A. I. Aliyu, A. Yusuf, D. Baleanu, Optical solitons for complex Ginzburg-Landau model in nonlinear optics, Optik, 158 (2018), 368–375.
    [13] A. H. Arnous, A. R. Seadawy, R. T. Alqahtani, A. Biswas, Optical solitons with complex Ginzburg-Landau equation by modified simple equation method, Optik, 144 (2017), 475–480.
    [14] A. H. Khater, D. K. Callebaut, A. R. Seadawy, General soliton solutions of an n-dimensional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, Phys. Scr., 62 (2000), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1238/Physica.Regular.062a00353 doi: 10.1238/Physica.Regular.062a00353
    [15] A. Das, A. Biswas, M. Ekici, Q. Zhou, A. S. Alshomrani, M. R. Belic, Optical solitons with complex Ginzburg-Landau equation for two nonlinear forms using F-expansion, Chinese J. Phys., 61 (2019), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2019.08.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2019.08.009
    [16] D. S. Oliveira, E. C. de Oliveira, On a Caputo-type fractional derivative, Adv. Pure Appl. Math., 10 (2019), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/apam-2017-0068 doi: 10.1515/apam-2017-0068
    [17] T. M. Atanackovic, S. Pilipovic, D. Zorica, Properties of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and its distributional settings, Fract. Calcul. Appl. Anal., 21 (2018), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2018-0003 doi: 10.1515/fca-2018-0003
    [18] M. D. Ortigueira, Fractional calculus for scientists and engineers, Berlin: Springer, 2011.
    [19] R. Khalil, M. Al Horani, A. Yousef, M. Sababheh, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 264 (2014), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002
    [20] B. Ghanbari, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, The generalized exponential rational function method for Radhakrishnan-kundu-lakshmanan equation with Beta conformable time derivative, Revista Mexicana de Fisica, 65 (2019), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.65.503 doi: 10.31349/revmexfis.65.503
    [21] B. A. Jacobs, A new Grunwald-Letnikov derivative derived from a second-order scheme, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2015 (2015), 952057. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/952057 doi: 10.1155/2015/952057
    [22] J. Vanterler da C. Sousa, E. Capelas de. Oliveira, A new truncated M-fractional derivative type unifying some fractional derivative types with classical properties, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 16 (2018), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.08187 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1704.08187
    [23] K. S. Al-Ghafri, Soliton behaviours for the conformable space-time fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation in optical fibers, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12020219 doi: 10.3390/sym12020219
    [24] C. Huang, Z. Li, New exact solutions of the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, Math. Problems Eng., 2021 (2021), 6640086. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6640086 doi: 10.1155/2021/6640086
    [25] E. Yaşar, Y. Yıldırım, Q. Zhou, S. P. Moshokoa, M. Z. Ullah, H. Triki, et al., Perturbed dark and singular optical solitons in polarization preserving fibers by modified simple equation method, Superlatti. Micro., 111 (2017), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.004
    [26] T. A. Sulaiman, H. M. Baskonus, A. Bulut, Optical solitons and other solutions to the conformable space-time fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation under Kerr law nonlinearity, Pramana J. Phys., 58 (2018), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1635-9 doi: 10.1007/s12043-018-1635-9
    [27] M. A. Abdou, A. A. Soliman, A. Biswas, M. Ekici, Q. Zhou, S. P. Moshokoa, Dark-singular combo optical solitons with fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, Optik, 171 (2018), 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.076 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.076
    [28] S. Arshed, Soliton solutions of fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law and non-Kerr law media, Optik, 160 (2018), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.022 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.022
    [29] B. Ghanbari, J. F. G`o.an-Aguilar, Optical soliton solutions of the Ginzburg-Landau equation with conformable derivative and Kerr law nonlinearity, Revista Mexicana de Fisica, 65 (2019), 73–81.
    [30] P. H. Lu, B. H. Wang, C. Q. Dai, Fractional traveling wave solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via two methods, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 8518–8526. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6511 doi: 10.1002/mma.6511
    [31] A. Hussain, A. Jhangeer, Optical solitons of fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau with conformable, beta, and M-truncated derivatives: a comparative study, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 612. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03052-7 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03052-7
    [32] G. Akram, M. Sadaf, H. Mariyam, A comparative study of the optical solitons for the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation using different fractional differential operators, Optik, 256 (2022), 168626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168626 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168626
    [33] M. Sadaf, G. Akram, M. Dawood, An investigation of fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity in the sense of conformable, beta and M‑truncated derivatives, Opt. Quant. Electron., 54 (2022), 248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03570-6 doi: 10.1007/s11082-022-03570-6
    [34] A. Zafar, M. Shakeel, Optical solitons of nonlinear complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via two modified expansion schemes, Opt. Quant. Electron., 54 (2022), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-03393-x doi: 10.1007/s11082-021-03393-x
    [35] H. M. Baskonus, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, New singular soliton solutions to the longitudinal wave equation in a magneto-electro-elastic circular rod with M-derivative, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 33 (2019), 1950251. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984919502518 doi: 10.1142/S0217984919502518
    [36] B. Ghanbari, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, New exact optical soliton solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with second-order spatio-temporal dispersion involving M-derivative, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 33 (2019), 1950235. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021798491950235X doi: 10.1142/S021798491950235X
    [37] S. Demiray, O. Unsal, A. Bekir, New exact solutions for Boussinesq type equations by using (G/G,1/G) and (1/G)expansion method, Acta Phys. Pol. A, 125 (2014), 1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.125.1093 doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.125.1093
    [38] Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Pang, Application of (G/G.2) expansion method for solving Schrodinger's equation with three-order dispersion, Adv. Appl. Math., 6 (2017), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2017.62024 doi: 10.12677/aam.2017.62024
    [39] I. Siddique, M. M. M. Jaradat, A. Zafar, K. B. Mehdi, M. S. Osman, Exact traveling wave solutions for two prolific conformable M-Fractional differential equations via three diverse approaches, Results Phys., 28 (2021), 104557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104557 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104557
    [40] I. Siddique, K. B. Mehdi, M. M. M. Jaradat, A. Zafar, M. E. Elbrolosy, A. A. Elmandouh, et al., Bifurcation of some new traveling wave solutions for the time-space M-fractional MEW equation via three altered methods, Results Phys., 41 (2022), 105896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105896 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105896
    [41] A. Biswas, S. Konar, E. Zerrad, Soliton-soliton interaction with parabolic law nonlinearity, J. Electromag. Waves Appl., 20 (2002), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1163/156939306776149833 doi: 10.1163/156939306776149833
    [42] E. Yaşar, Y. Yıldırım, Q. Zhou, S. P. Moshokoa, M. Z. Ullah, H. Triki, et al., Perturbed dark and singular optical solitons in polarization preserving fibers by modified simple equation method, Superlatti. Micro., 111 (2017), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.004
    [43] A. Biswas, S. Konar, E. Zerrad, Soliton-soliton interaction with parabolic law nonlinearity, J. Electromag. Waves Appl., 20 (2006), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1163/156939306776149833 doi: 10.1163/156939306776149833
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Waqar Afzal, Sayed M. Eldin, Waqas Nazeer, Ahmed M. Galal, Some integral inequalities for harmonical $ cr $-$ h $-Godunova-Levin stochastic processes, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 13473, 10.3934/math.2023683
    2. Pengfei Li, Boris A. Malomed, Dumitru Mihalache, 2024, Chapter 4, 978-3-031-54977-9, 123, 10.1007/978-3-031-54978-6_4
    3. Sonia Akram, Jamshad Ahmad, Shalan Alkarni, Nehad Ali Shah, Analysis of lump solutions and modulation instability to fractional complex Ginzburg–Landau equation arise in optical fibers, 2023, 53, 22113797, 106991, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106991
    4. Baboucarr Ceesay, Nauman Ahmed, Jorge E. Macías-Díaz, Construction of M-shaped solitons for a modified regularized long-wave equation via Hirota's bilinear method, 2024, 22, 2391-5471, 10.1515/phys-2024-0057
    5. Junseok Kim, Nonlinear dynamic evolution of a novel normalized time-fractional Burgers equation, 2025, 13, 26668181, 101096, 10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101096
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1563) PDF downloads(66) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog