Research article Special Issues

New applications of various distance techniques to multi-criteria decision-making challenges for ranking vague sets

  • Using the Fermatean vague normal set (FVNS), problems requiring multiple attribute decision making (MADM) have been resolved in this article. This article focuses on the log Fermatean vague normal weighted averaging (log FVNWA), logarithmic Fermatean vague normal weighted geometric (log FVNWG), log generalized Fermatean vague normal weighted averaging (log GFVNWA) and log generalized Fermatean vague normal weighted geometric (log GFVNWG) operators. Described the scoring function, accuracy function and operational laws of the log FVNS. The Euclidean and Humming distance are extended with numerical examples. The features of the log FVNS based on the algebraic operations, including idempotency, boundedness, commutativity and monotonicity are also examined. A field of applied engineering called agricultural robotics has been compared to computer science and machine tool technology. Five distinct agricultural robotics including autonomous mobile robots, articulated robots, humanoid robots, cobot robots, and hybrid robots are randomly chosen. Findings can be compared to established criteria to determine which robotics are the most successful. The results of the models are expressed as a natural number α. We contrast several existing with those that have been developed in order to show the effectiveness and accuracy of the models.

    Citation: Murugan Palanikumar, Nasreen Kausar, Shams Forruque Ahmed, Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah, Ebru Ozbilge, Alper Bulut. New applications of various distance techniques to multi-criteria decision-making challenges for ranking vague sets[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11397-11424. doi: 10.3934/math.2023577

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zainab Alsheekhhussain, Ahmed Gamal Ibrahim, Rabie A. Ramadan . Existence of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions for non-instantaneous impulsive semilinear differential equations and inclusions of fractional order 1<α<2. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 76-101. doi: 10.3934/math.2023004
    [2] Dongdong Gao, Daipeng Kuang, Jianli Li . Some results on the existence and stability of impulsive delayed stochastic differential equations with Poisson jumps. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15269-15284. doi: 10.3934/math.2023780
    [3] Ramkumar Kasinathan, Ravikumar Kasinathan, Dumitru Baleanu, Anguraj Annamalai . Well posedness of second-order impulsive fractional neutral stochastic differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9222-9235. doi: 10.3934/math.2021536
    [4] Huanhuan Zhang, Jia Mu . Periodic problem for non-instantaneous impulsive partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3345-3359. doi: 10.3934/math.2022186
    [5] Ahmed Salem, Kholoud N. Alharbi . Fractional infinite time-delay evolution equations with non-instantaneous impulsive. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 12943-12963. doi: 10.3934/math.2023652
    [6] Mohamed Adel, M. Elsaid Ramadan, Hijaz Ahmad, Thongchai Botmart . Sobolev-type nonlinear Hilfer fractional stochastic differential equations with noninstantaneous impulsive. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20105-20125. doi: 10.3934/math.20221100
    [7] Marimuthu Mohan Raja, Velusamy Vijayakumar, Anurag Shukla, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Wedad Albalawi, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty . A new discussion concerning to exact controllability for fractional mixed Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equations of order r(1,2) with impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10802-10821. doi: 10.3934/math.2023548
    [8] Kanagaraj Muthuselvan, Baskar Sundaravadivoo, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Suliman Alsaeed . Discussion on iterative process of nonlocal controllability exploration for Hilfer neutral impulsive fractional integro-differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16846-16863. doi: 10.3934/math.2023861
    [9] M. Manjula, K. Kaliraj, Thongchai Botmart, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, C. Ravichandran . Existence, uniqueness and approximation of nonlocal fractional differential equation of sobolev type with impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4645-4665. doi: 10.3934/math.2023229
    [10] Dumitru Baleanu, Rabha W. Ibrahim . Optical applications of a generalized fractional integro-differential equation with periodicity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11953-11972. doi: 10.3934/math.2023604
  • Using the Fermatean vague normal set (FVNS), problems requiring multiple attribute decision making (MADM) have been resolved in this article. This article focuses on the log Fermatean vague normal weighted averaging (log FVNWA), logarithmic Fermatean vague normal weighted geometric (log FVNWG), log generalized Fermatean vague normal weighted averaging (log GFVNWA) and log generalized Fermatean vague normal weighted geometric (log GFVNWG) operators. Described the scoring function, accuracy function and operational laws of the log FVNS. The Euclidean and Humming distance are extended with numerical examples. The features of the log FVNS based on the algebraic operations, including idempotency, boundedness, commutativity and monotonicity are also examined. A field of applied engineering called agricultural robotics has been compared to computer science and machine tool technology. Five distinct agricultural robotics including autonomous mobile robots, articulated robots, humanoid robots, cobot robots, and hybrid robots are randomly chosen. Findings can be compared to established criteria to determine which robotics are the most successful. The results of the models are expressed as a natural number α. We contrast several existing with those that have been developed in order to show the effectiveness and accuracy of the models.



    Fractional differential equations rise in many fields, such as biology, physics and engineering. There are many results about the existence of solutions and control problems (see [1,2,3,4,5,6]).

    It is well known that the nonexistence of nonconstant periodic solutions of fractional differential equations was shown in [7,8,11] and the existence of asymptotically periodic solutions was derived in [8,9,10,11]. Thus it gives rise to study the periodic solutions of fractional differential equations with periodic impulses.

    Recently, Fečkan and Wang [12] studied the existence of periodic solutions of fractional ordinary differential equations with impulses periodic condition and obtained many existence and asymptotic stability results for the Caputo's fractional derivative with fixed and varying lower limits. In this paper, we study the Caputo's fractional evolution equations with varying lower limits and we prove the existence of periodic mild solutions to this problem with the case of general periodic impulses as well as small equidistant and shifted impulses. We also study the Caputo's fractional evolution equations with fixed lower limits and small nonlinearities and derive the existence of its periodic mild solutions. The current results extend some results in [12].

    Set ξq(θ)=1qθ11qϖq(θ1q)0, ϖq(θ)=1πn=1(1)n1θnq1Γ(nq+1)n!sin(nπq), θ(0,). Note that ξq(θ) is a probability density function defined on (0,), namely ξq(θ)0, θ(0,) and 0ξq(θ)dθ=1.

    Define T:XX and S:XX given by

    T(t)=0ξq(θ)S(tqθ)dθ,  S(t)=q0θξq(θ)S(tqθ)dθ.

    Lemma 2.1. ([13,Lemmas 3.2,3.3]) The operators T(t) and S(t),t0 have following properties:

    (1) Suppose that supt0S(t)M. For any fixed t0, T() and S() are linear and bounded operators, i.e., for any uX,

    T(t)uMu and S(t)uMΓ(q)u.

    (2) {T(t),t0} and {S(t),t0} are strongly continuous.

    (3) {T(t),t>0} and {S(t),t>0} are compact, if {S(t),t>0} is compact.

    Let N0={0,1,,}. We consider the following impulsive fractional equations

    {cDqtk,tu(t)=Au(t)+f(t,u(t)), q(0,1), t(tk,tk+1), kN0,u(t+k)=u(tk)+Δk(u(tk)), kN,u(0)=u0, (2.1)

    where cDqtk,t denotes the Caputo's fractional time derivative of order q with the lower limit at tk, A:D(A)XX is the generator of a C0-semigroup {S(t),t0} on a Banach space X, f:R×XX satisfies some assumptions. We suppose the following conditions:

    (Ⅰ) f is continuous and T-periodic in t.

    (Ⅱ) There exist constants a>0, bk>0 such that

    {f(t,u)f(t,v)auv, tR, u,vX,uv+Δk(u)Δk(v)bkuv, kN, u,vX.

    (Ⅲ) There exists NN such that T=tN+1,tk+N+1=tk+T and Δk+N+1=Δk for any kN.

    It is well known [3] that (2.1) has a unique solution on R+ if the conditions (Ⅰ) and (Ⅱ) hold. So we can consider the Poincaré mapping

    P(u0)=u(T)+ΔN+1(u(T)).

    By [14,Lemma 2.2] we know that the fixed points of P determine T-periodic mild solutions of (2.1).

    Theorem 2.2. Assume that (I)-(III) hold. Let Ξ:=Nk=0MbkEq(Ma(tk+1tk)q), where Eq is the Mittag-Leffler function (see [3, p.40]), then there holds

    P(u)P(v)Ξuv, u,vX. (2.2)

    If Ξ<1, then (2.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution, which is also asymptotically stable.

    Proof. By the mild solution of (2.1), we mean that uC((tk,tk+1),X) satisfying

    u(t)=T(ttk)u(t+k)+ttkS(ts)f(s,u(s))ds. (2.3)

    Let u and v be two solutions of (2.3) with u(0)=u0 and v(0)=v0, respectively. By (2.3) and (II), we can derive

    u(t)v(t)T(ttk)(u(t+k)v(t+k))+ttk(ts)q1S(ts)(f(s,u(s)f(s,v(s))dsMu(t+k)v(t+k)+MaΓ(q)ttk(ts)q1f(s,u(s)f(s,v(s))ds. (2.4)

    Applying Gronwall inequality [15, Corollary 2] to (2.4), we derive

    u(t)v(t)Mu(t+k)v(t+k)Eq(Ma(ttk)q), t(tk,tk+1), (2.5)

    which implies

    u(tk+1)v(tk+1)MEq(Ma(tk+1tk)q)u(t+k)v(t+k),k=0,1,,N. (2.6)

    By (2.6) and (Ⅱ), we derive

    P(u0)P(v0)=u(tN+1)v(tN+1)+ΔN+1(u(tN+1))ΔN+1(v(tN+1))bN+1u(tN+1)v(tN+1)(Nk=0MbkEq(Ma(tk+1tk)q))u0v0=Ξu0v0, (2.7)

    which implies that (2.2) is satisfied. Thus P:XX is a contraction if Ξ<1. Using Banach fixed point theorem, we obtain that P has a unique fixed point u0 if Ξ<1. In addition, since

    Pn(u0)Pn(v0)Ξnu0v0, v0X,

    we get that the corresponding periodic mild solution is asymptotically stable.

    We study

    {cDqkhu(t)=Au(t)+f(u(t)), q(0,1), t(kh,(k+1)h), kN0,u(kh+)=u(kh)+ˉΔhq, kN,u(0)=u0, (2.8)

    where h>0, ˉΔX, and f:XX is Lipschitz. We know [3] that under above assumptions, (2.8) has a unique mild solution u(u0,t) on R+, which is continuous in u0X, tR+{kh|kN} and left continuous in t ant impulsive points {kh|kN}. We can consider the Poincaré mapping

    Ph(u0)=u(u0,h+).

    Theorem 2.3. Let w(t) be a solution of following equations

    {w(t)=ˉΔ+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t)), t[0,T],w(0)=u0. (2.9)

    Then there exists a mild solution u(u0,t) of (2.8) on [0,T], satisfying

    u(u0,t)=w(tqq1)+O(hq).

    If w(t) is a stable periodic solution, then there exists a stable invariant curve of Poincaré mapping of (2.8) in a neighborhood of w(t). Note that h is sufficiently small.

    Proof. For any t(kh,(k+1)h),kN0, the mild solution of (2.8) is equivalent to

    u(u0,t)=T(tkh)u(kh+)+tkh(ts)q1S(ts)f(u(u0,s))ds=T(tkh)u(kh+)+tkh0(tkhs)q1S(tkhs)f(u(u(kh+),s))ds. (2.10)

    So

    u((k+1)h+)=T(h)u(kh+)+ˉΔhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(u(u(kh+),s))ds=Ph(u(kh+)), (2.11)

    and

    Ph(u0)=u(u0,h+)=T(h)u0+ˉΔhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(u(u0,s))ds. (2.12)

    Inserting

    u(u0,t)=T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t), t[0,h],

    into (2.10), we obtain

    v(u0,t)=1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))ds=1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0)ds+1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)(f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))f(T(t)u0))ds=1hqt0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0)ds+O(hq),

    since

    t0(ts)q1S(ts)(f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))f(T(t)u0))dst0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0+hqv(u0,t))f(T(t)u0)dsMLlochqtqΓ(q+1)maxt[0,h]{v(u0,t)}h2qMLlocΓ(q+1)maxt[0,h]{v(u0,t)},

    where Lloc is a local Lipschitz constant of f. Thus we get

    u(u0,t)=T(t)u0+t0(ts)q1S(ts)f(T(t)u0)ds+O(h2q), t[0,h], (2.13)

    and (2.12) gives

    Ph(u0)=T(h)u0+ˉΔhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(T(h)u0)ds+O(h2q).

    So (2.11) becomes

    u((k+1)h+)=T(h)u(kh+)+ˉΔhq+(k+1)hkh((k+1)hs)q1S((k+1)hs)f(T(h)u(kh+))ds+O(h2q). (2.14)

    Since T(t) and S(t) are strongly continuous,

    limt0T(t)=I and limt0S(t)=1Γ(q)I. (2.15)

    Thus (2.14) leads to its approximation

    w((k+1)h+)=w(kh+)+ˉΔhq+hqΓ(q+1)f(w(kh+)),

    which is the Euler numerical approximation of

    w(t)=ˉΔ+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t)).

    Note that (2.10) implies

    u(u0,t)T(tkh)u(kh+)=O(hq), t[kh,(k+1)h]. (2.16)

    Applying (2.15), (2.16) and the already known results about Euler approximation method in [16], we obtain the result of Theorem 2.3.

    Corollary 2.4. We can extend (2.8) for periodic impulses of following form

    {cDqkhu(t)=Au(t)+f(u(t)), t(kh,(k+1)h), kN0,u(kh+)=u(kh)+ˉΔkhq, kN,u(0)=u0, (2.17)

    where ˉΔkX satisfy ˉΔk+N+1=ˉΔk for any kN. Then Theorem 2.3 can directly extend to (2.17) with

    {w(t)=N+1k=1ˉΔkN+1+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t)), t[0,T], kN,w(0)=u0 (2.18)

    instead of (2.9).

    Proof. We can consider the Poincaré mapping

    Ph(u0)=u(u0,(N+1)h+),

    with a form of

    Ph=PN+1,hP1,h

    where

    Pk,h(u0)=ˉΔkhq+u(u0,h).

    By (2.13), we can derive

    Pk,h(u0)=ˉΔkhq+u(u0,h)=T(h)u0+ˉΔkhq+h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(T(h)u0)ds+O(h2q).

    Then we get

    Ph(u0)=T(h)u0+N+1k=1ˉΔkhq+(N+1)h0(hs)q1S(hs)f(T(h)u0)ds+O(h2q).

    By (2.15), we obtain that Ph(u0) leads to its approximation

    u0+N+1k=1ˉΔkhq+(N+1)hqΓ(q+1)f(u0). (2.19)

    Moreover, equations

    w(t)=N+1k=1ˉΔkN+1+1Γ(q+1)f(w(t))

    has the Euler numerical approximation

    u0+hq(N+1k=1ˉΔkN+1+1Γ(q+1)f(u0))

    with the step size hq, and its approximation of N+1 iteration is (2.19), the approximation of Ph. Thus Theorem 2.3 can directly extend to (2.17) with (2.18).

    Now we consider following equations with small nonlinearities of the form

    {cDq0u(t)=Au(t)+ϵf(t,u(t)), q(0,1), t(tk,tk+1), kN0,u(t+k)=u(tk)+ϵΔk(u(tk)), kN,u(0)=u0, (3.1)

    where ϵ is a small parameter, cDq0 is the generalized Caputo fractional derivative with lower limit at 0. Then (3.1) has a unique mild solution u(ϵ,t). Give the Poincaré mapping

    P(ϵ,u0)=u(ϵ,T)+ϵΔN+1(u(ϵ,T)).

    Assume that

    (H1) f and Δk are C2-smooth.

    Then P(ϵ,u0) is also C2-smooth. In addition, we have

    u(ϵ,t)=T(t)u0+ϵω(t)+O(ϵ2),

    where ω(t) satisfies

    {cDq0ω(t)=Aω(t)+f(t,T(t)u0), t(tk,tk+1), k=0,1,,N,ω(t+k)=ω(tk)+Δk(T(tk)u0), k=1,2,,N+1,ω(0)=0,

    and

    ω(T)=Nk=1T(Ttk)Δk(T(tk)u0)+T0(Ts)q1S(Ts)f(s,T(s)u0)ds.

    Thus we derive

    {P(ϵ,u0)=u0+M(ϵ,u0)+O(ϵ2)M(ϵ,u0)=(T(T)I)u0+ϵω(T)+ϵΔN+1(T(T)u0). (3.2)

    Theorem 3.1. Suppose that (I), (III) and (H1) hold.

    1). If (T(T)I) has a continuous inverse, i.e. (T(T)I)1 exists and continuous, then (3.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution located near 0 for any ϵ0 small.

    2). If (T(T)I) is not invertible, we suppose that ker(T(T)I)=[u1,,uk] and X=im(T(T)I)X1 for a closed subspace X1 with dimX1=k. If there is v0[u1,,uk] such that B(0,v0)=0 (see (3.7)) and the k×k-matrix DB(0,v0) is invertible, then (3.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution located near T(t)v0 for any ϵ0 small.

    3). If rσ(Du0M(ϵ,u0))<0, then the T-periodic mild solution is asymptotically stable. If rσ(Du0M(ϵ,u0))(0,+), then the T-periodic mild solution is unstable.

    Proof. The fixed point u0 of P(ϵ,x0) determines the T-periodic mild solution of (3.1), which is equivalent to

    M(ϵ,u0)+O(ϵ2)=0. (3.3)

    Note that M(0,u0)=(T(T)I)u0. If (T(T)I) has a continuous inverse, then (3.3) can be solved by the implicit function theorem to get its solution u0(ϵ) with u0(0)=0.

    If (T(T)I) is not invertible, then we take a decomposition u0=v+w, v[u1,,uk], take bounded projections Q1:Xim(T(T)I), Q2:XX1, I=Q1+Q2 and decompose (3.3) to

    Q1M(ϵ,v+w)+Q1O(ϵ2)=0, (3.4)

    and

    Q2M(ϵ,v+w)+Q2O(ϵ2)=0. (3.5)

    Now Q1M(0,v+w)=(T(T)I)w, so we can solve by implicit function theorem from (3.4), w=w(ϵ,v) with w(0,v)=0. Inserting this solution into (3.5), we get

    B(ϵ,v)=1ϵ(Q2M(ϵ,v+w)+Q2O(ϵ2))=Q2ω(T)+Q2ΔN+1(T(t)v+w(ϵ,v))+O(ϵ). (3.6)

    So

    B(0,v)=Nk=1Q2T(Ttk)Δk(T(tk)v)+Q2T0(Ts)q1S(Ts)f(s,T(s)v)ds. (3.7)

    Consequently we get, if there is v0[u1,,uk] such that B(0,v0)=0 and the k×k-matrix DB(0,v0) is invertible, then (3.1) has a unique T-periodic mild solution located near T(t)v0 for any ϵ0 small.

    In addition, Du0P(ϵ,u0(ϵ))=I+Du0M(ϵ,u0)+O(ϵ2). Thus we can directly derive the stability and instability results by the arguments in [17].

    In this section, we give an example to demonstrate Theorem 2.2.

    Example 4.1. Consider the following impulsive fractional partial differential equation:

    { cD12tk,tu(t,y)=2y2u(t,y)+sinu(t,y)+cos2πt,  t(tk,tk+1), kN0,  y[0,π], Δk(u(tk,y))=u(t+k,y)u(tk,y)=ξu(tk,y),  kN,  y[0,π], u(t,0)=u(t,π)=0,  t(tk,tk+1),  kN0, u(0,y)=u0(y),  y[0,π], (4.1)

    for ξR, tk=k3. Let X=L2[0,π]. Define the operator A:D(A)XX by Au=d2udy2 with the domain

    D(A)={uXdudy,d2udy2X, u(0)=u(π)=0}.

    Then A is the infinitesimal generator of a C0-semigroup {S(t),t0} on X and S(t)M=1 for any t0. Denote u(,y)=u()(y) and define f:[0,)×XX by

    f(t,u)(y)=sinu(y)+cos2πt.

    Set T=t3=1, tk+3=tk+1, Δk+3=Δk, a=1, bk=|1+ξ|. Obviously, conditions (I)-(III) hold. Note that

    Ξ=2k=0|1+ξ|E12(13)=|1+ξ|3(E12(13))3.

    Letting Ξ<1, we get E12(13)1<ξ<E12(13)1. Now all assumptions of Theorem 2.2 hold. Hence, if E12(13)1<ξ<E12(13)1, (4.1) has a unique 1-periodic mild solution, which is also asymptotically stable.

    This paper deals with the existence and stability of periodic solutions of impulsive fractional evolution equations with the case of varying lower limits and fixed lower limits. Although, Fečkan and Wang [12] prove the existence of periodic solutions of impulsive fractional ordinary differential equations in finite dimensional Euclidean space, we extend some results to impulsive fractional evolution equation on Banach space by involving operator semigroup theory. Our results can be applied to some impulsive fractional partial differential equations and the proposed approach can be extended to study the similar problem for periodic impulsive fractional evolution inclusions.

    The authors are grateful to the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11661016), Training Object of High Level and Innovative Talents of Guizhou Province ((2016)4006), Major Research Project of Innovative Group in Guizhou Education Department ([2018]012), Foundation of Postgraduate of Guizhou Province (YJSCXJH[2019]031), the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-18-0308, and the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA No. 2/0153/16 and No. 1/0078/17.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    [2] K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 20 (1986), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
    [3] M. B. Gorzalczany, A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set Syst., 21 (1987), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90148-5 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90148-5
    [4] R. Biswas, Vague groups, Int. J. Comput. Cognition, 4 (2006), 20–23.
    [5] R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multi criteria decision making, IEEE T. Fuzzy Sys., 22 (2014), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
    [6] X. D. Peng, Y. Yang, Fundamental properties of interval valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 31 (2015), 444–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/INT.21790 doi: 10.1002/INT.21790
    [7] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, F. Ghani, T. Mahmood, Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 2829–2844. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-172009 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-172009
    [8] F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic set-a generalization of the intuitionstic fuzzy set, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 24 (2005), 287–297.
    [9] T. Senapati, R. R. Yager, Fermatean fuzzy sets, J. Amb. Intell. Hum. Comp., 11 (2020), 663–674.
    [10] B. C. Cuong, V. Kreinovich, Picture fuzzy sets-A new concept for computational intelligence problems, 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT 2013), 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICT.2013.7113099
    [11] M. Akram, W. A. Dudek, F. Ilyas, Group decision-making based on Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22103 doi: 10.1002/int.22103
    [12] M. Akram, W. A. Dudek, J. M. Dar, Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy aggregation operators with application in multicriteria decision-making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 3000–3019. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22183 doi: 10.1002/int.22183
    [13] M. Akram, X. D. Peng, A. N. Al-Kenani, A. Sattar, Prioritized weighted aggregation operators under complex Pythagorean fuzzy information, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 39 (2020), 4763–4783. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200684 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-200684
    [14] T. M. Athira, S. J. John, H. Garg, Entropy and distance measures of Pythagorean fuzzy soft sets and their applications, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 4071–4084. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190217 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-190217
    [15] H. Garg, Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multi criteria decision-making, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 42 (2017), 5275–5290.
    [16] H. Garg, New logarithmic operational laws and their aggregation operators for Pythagorean fuzzy set and their applications, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22043 doi: 10.1002/int.22043
    [17] Z. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 15 (2007), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678
    [18] W. F. Liu, J. Chang, X. He, Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and applications in decision making, Control Decis., 31 (2016), 2280–2286. http://doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2015.1537 doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2015.1537
    [19] K. Rahman, S. Abdullah, M. Shakeel, M. S. A. Khan, M. Ullah, Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and their application to group decision making problem, Cogent Math., 4 (2017), 1338638. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311835.2017.1338638 doi: 10.1080/23311835.2017.1338638
    [20] K. Rahman, A. Ali, S. Abdullah, F. Amin, Approaches to multi-attribute group decision making based on induced interval valued Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein aggregation operator, New Math. Nat. Comput., 14 (2018), 343–361. http://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005718500217 doi: 10.1142/S1793005718500217
    [21] Z. L. Yang, J. P. Chang, Interval-valued Pythagorean normal fuzzy information aggregation operators for multi-attribute decision making, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 51295–51314. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978976 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978976
    [22] F. K. Gündoğdu, C. Kahraman, Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36, (2019), 337–352. http://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181401 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-181401
    [23] P. D. Liu, G. Shahzadi, M. Akram, Specific types of q-Rung picture fuzzy Yager aggregation operators for decision-making, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 13 (2020), 1072–1091. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200717.001 doi: 10.2991/ijcis.d.200717.001
    [24] H. Bustince, P. Burillo, Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set Syst., 79 (1996), 403–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00154-9 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00154-9
    [25] A. Kumar, S.P. Yadav, S. Kumar, Fuzzy system reliability analysis using Tw (the weakest t‐norm) based arithmetic operations on LR type interval valued vague sets, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., 24 (2007), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710817126 doi: 10.1108/02656710710817126
    [26] J. Wang, S. Y. Liu, J. Zhang, S. Y. Wang, On the parameterized OWA operators for fuzzy MCDM based on vague set theory, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak., 5 (2006), 5–20. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-005-4912-2 doi: 10.1007/s10700-005-4912-2
    [27] X. L. Zhang, Z. S. Xu, Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 29 (2014), 1061–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676 doi: 10.1002/int.21676
    [28] C. Jana, M. Pal, Application of bipolar intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets in decision-making problem, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl., 7 (2018), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFSA.2018070103 doi: 10.4018/IJFSA.2018070103
    [29] C. Jana, Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on extended bipolar fuzzy MABAC approach, Comput. Appl. Math., 40 (2021), 227.
    [30] C. Jana, M. Pal, A Robust single-valued neutrosophic soft aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11010110 doi: 10.3390/sym11010110
    [31] C. Jana, M. Pal, J. Q. Wang, A robust aggregation operator for multi-criteria decision making method with bipolar fuzzy soft environment, Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst., 2019.
    [32] C. Jana, T. Senapati, M. Pal, Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its applications in multiple attribute decision-making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 2019–2038. http://doi.org/10.1002/int.22125 doi: 10.1002/int.22125
    [33] K. Ullah, T. Mahmood, Z. Ali, N. Jan, On some distance measures of complex Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition, Complex Intell. Syst., 6 (2019), 15–27.
    [34] C. Jana, M. Pal, F. Karaaslan, J. Q. Wang, Trapezoidal neutrosophic aggregation operators and their application to the multi-attribute decision-making process, Sci. Iran., 27 (2020), 1655–1673. http://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.51136.20 doi: 10.24200/sci.2018.51136.20
    [35] C. Jana, M. Pal, Multi-criteria decision-making process based on some single-valued neutrosophic Dombi power aggregation operators, Soft Comput., 25 (2021), 5055–5072.
    [36] Z.Yang, J.Chang, Interval-valued Pythagorean normal fuzzy information aggregation operators for multi-attribute decision making, IEEE Acess, 8 (2020), 51295–51314. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978976 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978976
    [37] M. S. Yang, C. H. Ko, On a class of fuzzy c-numbers clustering procedures for fuzzy data, Fuzzy Set Syst., 84 (1996), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00308-8 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00308-8
    [38] Y. Rong, L. Y. Yu, W. Y. Niu, Y. Liu, T. Senapati, A. R. Mishra, MARCOS approach based upon cubic Fermatean fuzzy set and its application in evaluation and selecting cold chain logistics distribution center, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 116 (2022), 105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105401 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105401
    [39] Y. Rong, W. Y. Niu, H. Garg, Y. Liu, L. Y. Yu, A hybrid group decision approach based on MARCOS and regret theory for pharmaceutical enterprises assessment under a single-valued neutrosophic scenario, Systems, 10 (2022), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040106 doi: 10.3390/systems10040106
    [40] Y. Jin, S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, Spherical fuzzy logarithmic aggregation operators based on entropy and their application in decision support systems, Entropy, 21 (2019), 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21070628 doi: 10.3390/e21070628
    [41] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, F. Smarandache, N. ul Amin, Logarithmic hybrid aggregation operators based on single valued neutrosophic sets and their applications in decision support systems, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030364 doi: 10.3390/sym11030364
    [42] D. Pamucar, I. Badi, K. Sanja, R. Obradovic, A novel approach for the selection of power generation technology using an linguistic neutrosophic combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method: A case study in Libya, Energies, 11 (2018), 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092489 doi: 10.3390/en11092489
    [43] B. Bairagi, A homogeneous group decision making for selection of robotic systems using extended TOPSIS under subjective and objective factors, Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., 5 (2022), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0304052022b doi: 10.31181/dmame0304052022b
    [44] S. Said, H. Bouloiz, M. Gallab, New model for making resilient decisions in an uncertain context: The rational resilience based decision making model (R2DM), Decis. Mak. Appli. Manag. Eng., 6 (2023), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0601051229022s doi: 10.31181/dmame0601051229022s
    [45] M. R. Khan, K. Ullah, Q. Khan, Multi-attribute decision-making using Archimedean aggregation operator in T-spherical fuzzy environment, Rep. Mech. Eng., 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.31181/rme20031012023k doi: 10.31181/rme20031012023k
    [46] M. Riazand, H. M. A. Farid, Picture fuzzy aggregation approach with application to third-partylogistic provider selection process, Rep. Mech. Eng., 3 (2022), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme20023062022r doi: 10.31181/rme20023062022r
    [47] D. T. Do, Application of fuca method for multi-criteria decision making in mechanical machining processes, Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl., 5 (2022), 131–152. https://https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta051022061d doi: 10.31181/oresta051022061d
    [48] S. Biswas, G. Bandyopadhyay, D. Pamucar, N. Joshi, A multi-criteria based stock selection frameworkin emerging market, Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl., 2022. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta161122121b doi: 10.31181/oresta161122121b
    [49] M. K. Hasan, M. Y. Ali, A. Sultana, N. K. Mitra, Some picture fuzzy mean operators and their applications in decision-making, J. Fuzzy. Ext. Appl., 3 (2022), 349–361.
    [50] M. Abbas, M. W. Asghar, Y. H. Guo, Decision-making analysis of minimizing the death rate due to COVID-19 by using q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft bonferroni mean operator, J. Fuzzy Ext. Appl., 3 (2022), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2022.335045.1214 doi: 10.22105/jfea.2022.335045.1214
    [51] F. Liu, G. Aiwu, V. Lukovac, M. Vukic, A multicriteria model for the selection of the transport service provider: A single valued neutrosophic DEMATEL multicriteria model, Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., 1 (2018), 121–130.
    [52] C. Jana, G. Muhiuddin, M. Pal, Multi-criteria decision making approach based on SVTrN Dombi aggregation functions, Artif. Intell. Rev., 54 (2021), 3685–3723.
    [53] A. K. Adak, G. Kumar, Spherical distance measurement method for solving MCDM problems under Pythagorean fuzzy environment, J. Fuzzy Ext. Appl., 4 (2023), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2022.351677.1224 doi: 10.22105/jfea.2022.351677.1224
    [54] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, C. Jana, Multiple attribute decision-making approach for Pythagorean neutrosophic normal interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators, Comput. Appl. Math., 41 (2022), 90.
    [55] X. D. Peng, H. Y. Yuan, Fundamental properties of Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators, Fund. Inform., 147 (2016), 415–446. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2016-1415 doi: 10.3233/FI-2016-1415
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xinguang Zhang, Lixin Yu, Jiqiang Jiang, Yonghong Wu, Yujun Cui, Gisele Mophou, Solutions for a Singular Hadamard-Type Fractional Differential Equation by the Spectral Construct Analysis, 2020, 2020, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2020/8392397
    2. Xinguang Zhang, Jiqiang Jiang, Lishan Liu, Yonghong Wu, Extremal Solutions for a Class of Tempered Fractional Turbulent Flow Equations in a Porous Medium, 2020, 2020, 1024-123X, 1, 10.1155/2020/2492193
    3. Jingjing Tan, Xinguang Zhang, Lishan Liu, Yonghong Wu, Mostafa M. A. Khater, An Iterative Algorithm for Solving n -Order Fractional Differential Equation with Mixed Integral and Multipoint Boundary Conditions, 2021, 2021, 1099-0526, 1, 10.1155/2021/8898859
    4. Ahmed Alsaedi, Fawziah M. Alotaibi, Bashir Ahmad, Analysis of nonlinear coupled Caputo fractional differential equations with boundary conditions in terms of sum and difference of the governing functions, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 8314, 10.3934/math.2022463
    5. Lianjing Ni, Liping Wang, Farooq Haq, Islam Nassar, Sarp Erkir, The Effect of Children’s Innovative Education Courses Based on Fractional Differential Equations, 2022, 0, 2444-8656, 10.2478/amns.2022.2.0039
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1706) PDF downloads(66) Cited by(12)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog