L(U1), L(U2) | Frequency |
(1, 4) | 4 |
(2, 2) | 4 |
(2, 4) | 4(p+q-6) |
(4, 4) | 2(p-3)(q-3) |
In many experiments, our interest lies in testing the significance of means from the grand mean of the study variable. Sometimes, an additional linearly related uncontrollable factor is also observed along with the main study variable, known as a covariate. For example, in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) problem, the effect of pulse current on the surface roughness (study variable) is affected by the machining time (covariate). Hence, covariate plays a vital role in testing means, and if ignored, it may lead to false decisions. Therefore, we have proposed a covariate-based approach to analyze the means in this study. This new approach capitalizes on the covariate effect to refine the traditional structure and rectify misleading decisions, especially when covariates are present. Moreover, we have investigated the impact of assumptions on the new approach, including normality, linearity, and homogeneity, by considering equal or unequal sample sizes. This study uses percentage type Ⅰ error and power as our performance indicators. The findings reveal that our proposal outperforms the traditional one and is more useful in reaching correct decisions. Finally, for practical considerations, we have covered two real applications based on experimental data related to the engineering and health sectors and illustrated the implementation of the study proposal.
Citation: Tahir Mahmood, Muhammad Riaz, Anam Iqbal, Kabwe Mulenga. An improved statistical approach to compare means[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4596-4629. doi: 10.3934/math.2023227
[1] | Usman Babar, Haidar Ali, Shahid Hussain Arshad, Umber Sheikh . Multiplicative topological properties of graphs derived from honeycomb structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1562-1587. doi: 10.3934/math.2020107 |
[2] | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Azeem Haider, Moin A. Ansari . Computation of eccentric topological indices of zero-divisor graphs based on their edges. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11509-11518. doi: 10.3934/math.2022641 |
[3] | R. Abu-Gdairi, A. A. El-Atik, M. K. El-Bably . Topological visualization and graph analysis of rough sets via neighborhoods: A medical application using human heart data. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26945-26967. doi: 10.3934/math.20231379 |
[4] | Sadik Delen, Ismail Naci Cangul . Effect of edge and vertex addition on Albertson and Bell indices. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 925-937. doi: 10.3934/math.2021055 |
[5] | Sumiya Nasir, Nadeem ul Hassan Awan, Fozia Bashir Farooq, Saima Parveen . Topological indices of novel drugs used in blood cancer treatment and its QSPR modeling. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11829-11850. doi: 10.3934/math.2022660 |
[6] | Wei Gao, Zahid Iqbal, Shehnaz Akhter, Muhammad Ishaq, Adnan Aslam . On irregularity descriptors of derived graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4085-4107. doi: 10.3934/math.2020262 |
[7] | Chenxu Yang, Meng Ji, Kinkar Chandra Das, Yaping Mao . Extreme graphs on the Sombor indices. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19126-19146. doi: 10.3934/math.20221050 |
[8] | Edil D. Molina, José M. Rodríguez-García, José M. Sigarreta, Sergio J. Torralbas Fitz . On the Gutman-Milovanović index and chemical applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 1998-2020. doi: 10.3934/math.2025094 |
[9] | Fawaz E. Alsaadi, Faisal Ali, Imran Khalid, Masood Ur Rehman, Muhammad Salman, Madini Obad Alassafi, Jinde Cao . Quantifying some distance topological properties of the non-zero component graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3512-3524. doi: 10.3934/math.2021209 |
[10] | Zhenhua Su, Zikai Tang . Extremal unicyclic and bicyclic graphs of the Euler Sombor index. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6338-6354. doi: 10.3934/math.2025289 |
In many experiments, our interest lies in testing the significance of means from the grand mean of the study variable. Sometimes, an additional linearly related uncontrollable factor is also observed along with the main study variable, known as a covariate. For example, in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) problem, the effect of pulse current on the surface roughness (study variable) is affected by the machining time (covariate). Hence, covariate plays a vital role in testing means, and if ignored, it may lead to false decisions. Therefore, we have proposed a covariate-based approach to analyze the means in this study. This new approach capitalizes on the covariate effect to refine the traditional structure and rectify misleading decisions, especially when covariates are present. Moreover, we have investigated the impact of assumptions on the new approach, including normality, linearity, and homogeneity, by considering equal or unequal sample sizes. This study uses percentage type Ⅰ error and power as our performance indicators. The findings reveal that our proposal outperforms the traditional one and is more useful in reaching correct decisions. Finally, for practical considerations, we have covered two real applications based on experimental data related to the engineering and health sectors and illustrated the implementation of the study proposal.
Since molecules and molecular compounds are used to generate molecular graphs. Any graph that simulates some molecular structure can use a topological index as a mathematical formula [1]. Topological indices play a significant role in chemistry, pharmacology, etc., [2]. A molecular graph, whose vertices and edges are represented by atoms and chemical bonds, respectively, illustrates the constructional outcome of a chemical compound in graph theory form. Cheminformatics, a field shared by information science, chemistry and mathematics, has recently gained notoriety. This new topic discusses the connection between QSAR and QSPR, which is used to investigate (with a given level of accuracy) the theoretical and biological activities of specific chemical compounds [3]. For quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) and quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs), in which the physicochemical characteristics of molecules are correlated with their chemical structure, a topological index (TI) is a real number associated with chemical structures via their hydrogen-depleted graph [4,5,6].
Chemical graph theory is a newly developed area of mathematical chemistry that combines graph theory with chemistry. The main objective of chemical graph theory is to acknowledge the structural effects of a molecular graph [7]. The molecules and molecular compounds aid in the construction of a molecular graph. Topological descriptors, which are typically graph invariants, are numerical characteristics of a graph that describe its topology [8]. The certain physiochemical characteristics of some chemical compounds, such as their boiling point, strain energy, and stability are correlated by degree-based topological indices [9].
Chemical graph theory has many applications in many areas of life, including computer science, materials science, drug design, chemistry, biological networks, and electrical networks. For this reason, academics are currently very interested in this theory [10,11]. The numerical values attached to a simple, finite graph that represent its structure are called topological indices [12]. The multiplicative Zagreb indices for mathematical features, connection indices and applications see in [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. In this study, a novel method for computing the topological indices of two different chemical networks is presented. The mathematical properties of molecular structure descriptors, particularly those that depend on graph degrees, have been examined in our research. We derive neighborhood multiplicative topological indices and concise mathematical analysis for product of graphs (L) and tetrahedral diamond lattices (Ω). The fifth multiplicative Zagreb index, the general fifth-multiplicative Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative hyper-Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative product connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative sum connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index, the fifth-multiplicative harmonic index, and the fifth-multiplicative redefined Zagreb index are the topological indices that are taken into consideration. In this paper, we consider G=(V,E) to be a simple, connected and finite graph contains vertices (atoms) atoms and edges (chemical bonds linking these atoms), for notation referee to [21].
In 2017, the new neighborhood degree-based multiplicative topological indices were introduced by V. R. Kulli in [22]. Let §1 and §2 denote the fifth neighborhood multiplicative M-Zagreb index defined as:
§1(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)(L(U1)+L(U2))and§2(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)L(U1)L(U2). | (2.1) |
Let §3 and §5 denote the general fifth multiplicative Zagreb index that are defined as:
§3(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)[L(U1)+L(U2)]αand§5(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)[L(U1)L(U2)]α, | (2.2) |
where α is a real number.
The fifth multiplicative hyper-Zagreb index is denoted by §4 and §6 defined as:
§4(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)[L(U1)+L(U2)]2and§6(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)[L(U1)L(U2)]2. | (2.3) |
The fifth multiplicative product connectivity index §8 is defined as:
§8(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)1√L(U1)L(U2). | (2.4) |
The fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index of a graph G is defined as:
§9(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)1√L(U1)+L(U2) | (2.5) |
The fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index §10 of a graph G and it is defined as:
§10(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)2√L(U1)L(U2)√L(U1)+L(U2). | (2.6) |
Inspired by Kulli, Sarkar et al. [23] introduced the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind §7, the fifth multiplicative harmonic index §11 and the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index §12, respectively defined as:
§7(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)√L(U1)L(U2), | (2.7) |
§11(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)2√L(U1)+L(U2), | (2.8) |
§12(G)=∏U1U2∈E(G)L(U1)L(U2)[(L(U1)+L(U2]. | (2.9) |
For any two graphs L and M, the tensor product of the graphs L and M is interpreted as L⊗M. This product is also known as categorical product of graphs defined in [24,25]. The vertex set of L⊗M is denoted by V (L)×V (M). For any integers p and q, the tensor product Lp and Lq is described by Lp⊗Lq. This graph contains a.b number of vertices with vertex set
{(t1,t2):1≤t1≤q, 1≤t2≤p}, |
and edge between (t1, t2) and (t3, t4)exists if and only if:
|t1−t3|−|t2−t4|=1. |
The graph Lp⊗Lq is known as a L with vertex cardinality pq. The metric dimension of the categorial product of graphs is determined in [26] and edge irregular reflexive labeling of categorical product of two paths is determined in [27]. This shows the importance of this product in different areas. Ahmad [28] determined the upper bounds of irregularity measures of categorical product of two connected graphs. The edge partition of graph Lp⊗Lq based on the degree of end vertices is given in Table 1. This edge partition is also given in [29]. For more understanding we depicted L9⊗L10 in Figure 1.
L(U1), L(U2) | Frequency |
(1, 4) | 4 |
(2, 2) | 4 |
(2, 4) | 4(p+q-6) |
(4, 4) | 2(p-3)(q-3) |
Theorem 3.1. Let G be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth neighborhood multiplicative M-Zagreb indices for G are:
§1(G)=122880(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54), |
§2(G)=262144(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Proof. From the definitions of §1(G), §2(G) and Table 1, we have
§1(G)=|P(1,4)|(1+4)×|P(2,2)|(2+2)×|P(2,4)|(2+4)×|P(4,4)|(4+4)=4(5)×4(4)×4(p+q−6)(6)×2(p−3)(q−3)(8)=20×16×24(p+q−6)×16(p−3)(q−3)=122880(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Similarly,
§2(G)=|P(1,4)|(4)×|P(2,2)|(4)×|P(2,4)|(8)×|P(4,4)|(16)=4(4)×4(4)×4(p+q−6)(8)×2(p−3)(q−3)(16)=262144(p+q−6)(pq−3p−3q+9)=262144(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
The graphical representation of the Theorem 3.1 is given in Figure 2(a), (b).
Theorem 3.2. Let G be a tensor product of two paths. Then the general fifth multiplicative Zagreb indices of G are:
§3(G)=128(960)α(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54), |
§5(G)=128(2048)α(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Proof. From the definitions of §3(G) and Table 1, we get
§3(G)=|P(1,4)|(1+4)α×|P(2,2)|(2+2)α×|P(2,4)|(2+4)α×|P(4,4)|(4+4)α=4(5)α×4(4)α×4(p+q−6)(6)α×2(p−3)(q−3)(8)α=128(960)α(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
From the definitions of §5(G) and Table 1, we obtain
§5(G)=|P(1,4)|(1 × 4)α×|P(2,2)|(2×2)α×|P(2,4)|(2×4)α×|P(4,4)|(4×4)α=4(4)α×4(4)α×4(p+q−6)(8)α×2(p−3)(q−3)(16)α=128(2048)α(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Theorem 3.3. Let G be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative hyper-Zagreb indices for G are:
§4(G)=117964800(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54), |
§6(G)=536870912(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Proof. From the definitions of §4(G), §6(G) and Table 1, we obtain
§4(G)=|P(1,4)|(1+4)2×|P(2,2)|(2+2)2×|P(2,4)|(2+4)2×|P(4,4)|(4+4)2=4(5)2×4(4)2×4(p+q−6)(6)2×2(p−3)(q−3)(8)2=117964800(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54), |
§6(G)=|P(1,4)|(1 × 4)2×|P(2,2)|(22)2×|P(2,4)|(24)2×|P(4,4)|(44)2=4(4)2×4(4)2×4(p+q−6)(8)2×2(p−3)(q−3)(16)2=536870912(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
The graphical representations of Theorems 3.2 and 3.3 are shown in Figure 2(c)–(f) with p and q, respectively.
Theorem 3.4. The fifth multiplicative product connectivity index §8 for tensor product of two path G is:
§8(G)=14096√2(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Proof. From the formulation of §8(G) and Table 1, it is easy to calculate that
§8(G)=1|P(1,4)|√(4)×1|P(2,2)|√(4)×1|P(2,4)|√(8)×1|P(4,4)|√(16)=14√(4)×14√(4)×14(p+q−6)√(8)×12(p−3)(q−3)√(16)=14096√2(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
The graphical representation of fifth multiplicative product connectivity index §8 is shown in Figure 2(g) with p and q.
Theorem 3.5. Let G be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index of a graph G is:
§9(G)=11024√15(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Proof. From the formulation of §9(G) and Table 1, we get
§9=1|P(1,4)|√(5)×1|P(2,2)|√(4)×1|P(2,4)|√6×1|P(4,4)|√8=14√(5)×14√(4)×14(p+q−6)√6×12(p−3)(q−3)√8=11024√15×(p2q+pq2−3p2−3q2−12pq+27p+27q−54). |
Theorem 3.6. Let G be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index §10 of a graph G is:
§10(G)=64√2√15. |
Proof. By the definition of §10(G) and using the values of Table 1, we have
§10=2|P(1,4)|√(4)|P(1,4)|√(5)×2|P(2,2)|√(4)|P(2,2)|√(4)×2|P(2,4)|√(8)|P(2,4)|√6×2|P(4,4)|√(16)|P(4,4)|√(8)=24√44√5×24√44√4×24(p+q−6)√84(p+q−6)√6×22(p−3)(q−3)√162(p−3)(q−3)√8=64√2√15. |
The graphical representations of fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index §9 and fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index §10 is shown in Figure 3(a), (b), respectively.
Theorem 3.7. Let G be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind is
§7(G)=1024√2(p2q−3p2+pq2−12pq+27p−3q2+27q−54), |
the fifth multiplicative harmonic index is
§11(G)=164√15(p2q−3p2+pq2−12pq+27p−3q2+27q−54), |
the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index is
§12(G)=251658240(p+q−6)(p−3)(q−3). |
Proof. By using Table 1, in the formulation of §7(G) §11(G) and §12(G) we get
§7=|P(1,4)|√(1×4)×|P(2,2)|√(2×2)×|P(2,4)|√(2×4)×|P(4,4)|√(4×4)=4√4×4√4×4(p+q−6)√8×2(p−3)(q−3)√16=1024√2(p2q−3p2+pq2−12pq+27p−3q2+27q−54), |
§11(G)=2|P(1,4)|√(5)×2|P(2,2)|√(4)×2|P(2,4)|√6×2|P(4,4)|√(8)=12√(5)×12√(4)×12(p+q−6)√6×1(p−3)(q−3)√8=164√15(p2q−3p2+pq2−12pq+27p−3q2+27q−54), |
§12(G)=|P(1,4)|(1× 4)(1+4)×|P(2,2)|(2×2)(2+2)×|P(2,4)|(2×4)(2+4)×|P(4,4)|(4×4)(4+4)=251658240(p+q−6)(p−3)(q−3). |
The graphical representations of fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind, the fifth multiplicative harmonic index and the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index are shown in Figure 3(c)–(e), respectively.
A tetrahedral diamond lattice Ω is made up of t layers, each of which extends to lt. The initial layer only has one vertex, while the subsequent layer is isomorphic to S4 because it contains four vertices. Each layer l for t ≥3 has ∑l−2k=1k hexagons with 3 pendent vertices. We may set up each additional layer's vertices in accordance with the depth initial marking. To be more specific, we may use layer l to represent labels from ∑l−2k=1k2+1 to ∑l−2k=1k2. The vertex set of a Ω of size t contains vertices that are a and b while the edge set has edges that are 23(t2−t). Ω have no odd cycles, making them bipartite graphs. The graph of tetrahedral diamond lattice Ω is shown in Figure 4 and the edge partition based on the degree of end vertices is given in Table 2.
L(U1), L(U2) | Frequency |
(1, 4) | 4 |
(2, 4) | 12(t-2) |
(3, 4) | 6(t-2)(t-3) |
(4, 4) | 2/3(t3−9t2+26t−24) |
Theorem 4.1. Let Ω tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth neighborhood multiplicative M-Zagreb indices for Ω are:
§1(Ω)=40320(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§2(Ω)=1179648(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24). |
Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.1), we get
§1(Ω)=|P(1,4)|(1+4)×|P(2,4)|(2+4)×|P(3,4)|(3+4)×|P(4,4)|(4+4)=4(5)×12(t−2)(6)×6(t−2)(t−3)(7)×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)(8)=40320(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§2(Ω)=|P(1,4)|(1×4)×|P(2,4)|(2×4)×|P(3,4)|(3×4)×|P(4,4)|(4×4)=4(4)×12(t−2)(8)×6(t−2)(t−3)(12)×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)(16)=1179648(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24). |
The graphical representations of §1(Ω) and §2(Ω) with t is shown in Figure 5.
Theorem 4.2. Let Ω tetrahedral diamond lattice then the general fifth multiplicative Zagreb indices of Ω are:
§3(Ω)=192(1680)α(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§5(Ω)=192(6144)α(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−7t2+26t−24). |
Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.2), we get
§3(G)=[|P(1,4)|(1+4)α×|P(2,4)|(2+4)α×|P(3,4)|(3+4)α×|P(4,4)|(4+4)α]=4(5)α×12(t−2)(6)α×6(t−2)(t−3)(7)α×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)(8)α=192(1680)α(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§5(Ω)=[|P(1,4)|(1×4)α×|P(2,4)|(2×4)α×|P(3,4)|(3×4)α×|P(4,4)|(4×4)a]=[4(4)α×12(t−2)(8)α×6(t−2)(t−3)(12)α×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)(16)a=192(6144)a(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−7t2+26t−24). |
Theorem 4.3. Let Ω tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative hyper-Zagreb indices Ω are:
§4(Ω)=541900800(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§6(Ω)=7247757312(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−7t2+26t−24). |
Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.3), we get
§4(Ω)=|P(1,4)|(1+4)2×|P(2,4)|(2+4)2×|P(3,4)|(3+4)2×|P(4,4)|(4+4)2=4(5)2×12(t−2)(6)2×6(t−2)(t−3)(7)2×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)(8)2=4×12×6×23×(5×6×7×8)2(t−2)2(t−3)(t3−9t2+26t−24)=192(1680)2(t2+4−4t)(t−3)(t3−9t2+26t−24)=541900800(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§6(Ω)=|P(1,4)|(1×4)2×|P(2,4)|(2×4)2×|P(3,4)|(3×4)2×|P(4,4)|(4×4)2=4(4)2×12(t−2)(8)2×6(t−2)(t−3)(12)2×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)(16)2=4×12×6×23×(4×8×12×16)2(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−7t2+26t−24)=7247757312(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−7t2+26t−24). |
The graphical representations of §3(Ω)–§6(Ω), with t is shown in Figure 5.
Theorem 4.4. Let Ω tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index Ω are:
§8(Ω)=16144√6(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24). |
Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.4), we get
§8=1|P(1,4)|√(1×4)×1|P(2,4)|√(2×4)×1|P(3,4)|√(3×4)×1|P(4,4)|√(4×4)=14√(4)×112(t−2)√(8)×16(t−2)(t−3)√(12)×123(t3−9t2+26t−24)√16=16144√6(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24). |
The graphical representation of the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index §8(Ω) with t is shown in Figure 5.
Theorem 4.5. Let Ω tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index Ω is:
§9(Ω)=1768√210(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24). |
Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.5), we get
§9(Ω)=1|P(1,4)|√(1+4)×1|P(2,4)|√(2+4)×1|P(3,4)|√(3+4)×1|P(4,4)|√(4+4)=14√(5)×112(t−2)√(6)×16(t−2)(t−3)√(7)×123(t3−9t2+26t−24)√(8)=1768√210(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24). |
Theorem 4.6. Let Ω tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index Ω is
§10(Ω)=128√2√35. |
Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.6), we get
§10=2|P(1,4)|√(1×4)|P(1,4)|√(1+4)×2|P(2,4)|√(2×4)|P(2,4)|√(2+4)×2|P(3,4)|√(3×4)|P(3,4)|√(3+4)×2|P(4,4)|√(4×4)|P(4,4)|√(4+4)=2×4√44√5×2×12(t−2)√812(t−2)√6×2×6(t−2)(t−3)√126(t−2)(t−3)√7×2×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)√1623(t3−9t2+26t−24)√8=128√2√35. |
Theorem 4.7. Let Ω tetrahedral diamond lattice. Then the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind is
§7(Ω)=6144√6(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
the fifth multiplicative harmonic index is
§11(Ω)=148√105(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index is
§12(Ω)=1981808640(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−7t2+26t−24). |
Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.7), we get
§7(Ω)=|P(1,4)|√(1×4)×|P(2,4)|√(2×4)×|P(3,4)|√(3×4)×|P(4,4)|√(4×4)=4√(4)×12(t−2)√(8)×6(t−2)(t−3)√(12)×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)√16=6144√6(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§11(Ω)=2|P(1,4)|√(1+4)×2|P(2,4)|√(2+4)×2|P(3,4)|√(3+4)×2|P(4,4)|√(4+4)=24√(5)×212(t−2)√(6)×26(t−2)(t−3)√(7)×223(t3−9t2+26t−24)√(8)=148√105(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−9t2+26t−24), |
§12(Ω)=|P(1,4)|(1×4)(1+4)×|P(2,4)|(2×4)(2+4)×|P(3,4)|(3×4)(3+4)×|P(4,4)|(4×4)(4+4)=4(4)5×12(t−2)(8)6×6(t−2)(t−3)(12)(7)×23(t3−9t2+26t−24)16(8)=1981808640(t3−7t2+16t−12)(t3−7t2+26t−24). |
The graphical representations of the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind §7(Ω), the fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index §9(Ω), the fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index §10(Ω), fifth multiplicative harmonic index §11(Ω) and fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index §12(Ω) are shown in Figure 6.
This study contains a novel method for computing the topological indices of different chemical networks and namely the networks are product of graphs (L) and tetrahedral diamond lattices (Ω). The mathematical topological properties of molecular structure descriptors, specifically those that depend on graph degrees, are examined in this research work. We derived neighborhood multiplicative topological indices and concise mathematical analysis for product of graphs (L) and tetrahedral diamond lattices (Ω). A few topological descriptors are studied namely, the fifth multiplicative Zagreb index, the general fifth-multiplicative Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative hyper-Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative product connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative sum connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index, the fifth-multiplicative harmonic index, and the fifth-multiplicative redefined Zagreb index are the topological indices that are taken into consideration. Moreover, a comparative study is also included in this work.
The author is grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research of Jazan University for supporting financially this work under Waed grant No. (W44-91).
I declare that there is no conflict of interest of this article.
[1] |
M. E. Bakr, M. Nagy, A. A. Al-Babtain, Non-parametric hypothesis testing to model some cancers based on goodness of fit, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 13733–13745. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022756 doi: 10.3934/math.2022756
![]() |
[2] |
K. K. Jose, J. A. Luke, Confidence intervals for process capability indices for the unbalanced one‐way random effect ANOVA model, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Internat., 28 (2012), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1247 doi: 10.1002/qre.1247
![]() |
[3] |
B. L. Welch, On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach, Biometrika, 38 (1951), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332579 doi: 10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.330
![]() |
[4] |
G. James, The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown, Biometrika, 38 (1951), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.324 doi: 10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.324
![]() |
[5] |
M. B. Brown, A. B. Forsythe, The small sample behavior of some statistics which test the equality of several means, Technometrics, 16 (1974), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/1267501 doi: 10.1080/00401706.1974.10489158
![]() |
[6] |
R. A. Alexander, D. M. Govern, A new and simpler approximation for ANOVA under variance heterogeneity, J. Educ. Stat., 19 (1994), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165140 doi: 10.3102/10769986019002091
![]() |
[7] | D. E. Goldberg, S. M. Scheiner, ANOVA and ANCOVA: field competition experiments, In: Design and analysis of ecological experiments, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1993. |
[8] | A. Rutherford, ANOVA and ANCOVA: a GLM approach, John Wiley & Sons, 2011. |
[9] |
G. Shieh, Power analysis and sample size planning in ANCOVA designs, Psychometrika, 85 (2020), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-019-09692-3 doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09692-3
![]() |
[10] | E. R. Ott, Analysis of means: a graphical procedure, Ind. Qual. Control, 24 (1967), 101–109. |
[11] |
E. R. Ott, Analysis of means-a graphical procedure, J. Qual. Technol., 15 (1983), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1983.11978836 doi: 10.1080/00224065.1983.11978836
![]() |
[12] |
K. N. Murthy, R. Saravana, P. Rajendra, Critical comparison of north east monsoon rainfall for different regions through analysis of means technique, MAUSAM, 69 (2018), 411–418. doi: 10.54302/mausam.v69i3.331
![]() |
[13] |
M. A. Mohammed, R. Holder, Introducing analysis of means to medical statistics, BMJ Qual. Saf., 21 (2012), 529–532. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000477 doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000477
![]() |
[14] |
M. Oud, Lung function interpolation by means of neural-network-supported analysis of respiration sounds, Med. Eng. Phys., 25 (2003), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-4533(02)00198-4 doi: 10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00198-4
![]() |
[15] |
A. E. Kolosov, Preparation of reactoplastic nanomodified polymer composites. Part 2. Analysis of means of forming nanocomposites (patent review), Chem. Petrol. Eng., 51 (2016), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10556-016-0100-1 doi: 10.1007/s10556-016-0100-1
![]() |
[16] |
C.-I. Ho, P.-Y. Lin, S.-C. Huang, Exploring Taiwanses working holiday-makers' motivations: An analysis of means-end hierarchies, J. Hospitality Tourism Res., 38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348012461549 doi: 10.1177/1096348012461549
![]() |
[17] |
P. Delvoye, C. Guillaume, S. Collard, T. Nardella, V. Hannecart, M.-C. Mauroy, Preconception health promotion: analysis of means and constraints, Eur. J. Contracep. Repr. Health Care, 14 (2009), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625180903056123 doi: 10.1080/13625180903056123
![]() |
[18] |
E. G. Schilling, A systematic approach to the analysis of means: part Ⅰ. Analysis of treatment effects, J. Qual. Technol., 5 (1973), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1973.11980583 doi: 10.1080/00224065.1973.11980583
![]() |
[19] |
P. F. Ramig, Applications of the analysis of means, J. Qual. Technol., 15 (1983), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1983.11978837 doi: 10.1080/00224065.1983.11978837
![]() |
[20] |
P. S. Wludyka, P. R. Nelson, Analysis of means type tests for variances using subsampling and jackknifing, Amer. J. Math. Management Sci., 17 (1997), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.1997.10737429 doi: 10.1080/01966324.1997.10737429
![]() |
[21] |
A. J. Bernard, P. S. Wludyka, Robust I-sample analysis of means type randomization tests for variances, J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 69 (2001), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650108812082 doi: 10.1080/00949650108812082
![]() |
[22] |
P. Wludyka, P. Sa, A robust I-sample analysis of means type randomization test for variances for unbalanced designs, J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 74 (2004), 701–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650310001640138 doi: 10.1080/00949650310001640138
![]() |
[23] |
P. R. Nelson, E. J. Dudewicz, Exact analysis of means with unequal variances, Technometrics, 44 (2002), 152–160. http://doi.org/10.1198/004017002317375109 doi: 10.1198/004017002317375109
![]() |
[24] |
E. J. Dudewicz, P. R. Nelson, Heteroscedastic analysis of means (HANOM), Amer. J. Math. Management Sci., 23 (2003), 143–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2003.10737608 doi: 10.1080/01966324.2003.10737608
![]() |
[25] |
S. T. Bakir, Analysis of means using ranks, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 18 (1989), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918908812789 doi: 10.1080/03610918908812789
![]() |
[26] |
C.-H. Chang, N. Pal, W. K. Lim, J.-J. Lin, Comparing several population means: a parametric bootstrap method, and its comparison with usual ANOVA F test as well as ANOM, Comput. Statist., 25 (2010), 71–95. doi: 10.1007/s00180-009-0162-z
![]() |
[27] |
P. R. Nelson, Exact critical points for the analysis of means, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 11 (1982), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928208828263 doi: 10.1080/03610928208828263
![]() |
[28] |
P. R. Nelson, Additional uses for the analysis of means and extended tables of critical values, Technometrics, 35 (1993), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269290 doi: 10.1080/00401706.1993.10484994
![]() |
[29] |
W. C. Soong, J. C. Hsu, Using complex integration to compute multivariate normal probabilities, J. Comput. Graph. Statist., 6 (1997), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1390743 doi: 10.2307/1390743
![]() |
[30] |
N. R. Farnum, Analysis of means tables using mathematical processors, Qual. Eng., 16 (2004), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120027942 doi: 10.1081/QEN-120027942
![]() |
[31] |
L. S. Nelson, Factors for the analysis of means, J. Qual. Technol., 6 (1974), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1974.11980643 doi: 10.1080/00224065.1974.11980643
![]() |
[32] |
L. S. Nelson, Exact critical values for use with the analysis of means, J. Qual. Technol., 15 (1983), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1983.11978840 doi: 10.1080/00224065.1983.11978840
![]() |
[33] |
P. R. Nelson, The analysis of means for balanced experimental designs, J. Qual. Technol., 15 (1983), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1983.11978841 doi: 10.1080/00224065.1983.11978841
![]() |
[34] |
M. R. Stoline, H. K. Ury, Tables of the studentized maximum modulus distribution and an application to multiple comparisons among means, Technometrics, 21 (1979), 87–93. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1979.10489726
![]() |
[35] |
H. K. Ury, M. R. Stoline, B. T. Mitchell, Further tables of the studentized maximum modulus distribution: further tables of the studentized, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 9 (1980), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918008812146 doi: 10.1080/03610918008812146
![]() |
[36] |
M. Mendeş, S. Yiğit, Comparison of ANOVA-F and ANOM tests with regard to type Ⅰ error rate and test power, J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 83 (2013), 2093–2104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2012.679942 doi: 10.1080/00949655.2012.679942
![]() |
[37] |
G. H. Guirguis, R. Tobias, On the computation of the distribution for the analysis of means, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 33 (2004), 861–887. https://doi.org/10.1081/SAC-200040260 doi: 10.1081/SAC-200040260
![]() |
[38] |
P. Pallmann, L. A. Hothorn, Analysis of means: a generalized approach using R, J. Appl. Stat., 43 (2016), 1541–1560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1117584 doi: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1117584
![]() |
[39] |
K. P. Jayalath, H. K. T. Ng, Analysis of means approach for random factor analysis, J. Appl. Stat., 45 (2018), 1426–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2017.1375083 doi: 10.1080/02664763.2017.1375083
![]() |
[40] |
K. P. Jayalath, H. K. T. Ng, Analysis of means approach in advanced designs, Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus., 36 (2020), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2540 doi: 10.1002/asmb.2540
![]() |
[41] |
C. V. Rao, Analysis of means-a review, J. Qual. Technol., 37 (2005), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2005.11980334 doi: 10.1080/00224065.2005.11980334
![]() |
[42] | G. Chakravarthi, C. V. Rao, X-chart using ANOM approach, J. Stat., 17 (2010), 23–32. |
[43] |
A. B. Chakraborty, A. Khurshid, Measurement error effect on the power of ANOM control chart for doubly truncated normal distribution under standardization procedure, Annal. Manage. Sci., 4 (2015), 87–98. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3303.5120 doi: 10.24048/ams4.no2.2015-87
![]() |
[44] |
D. W. Apley, Posterior distribution charts: a Bayesian approach for graphically exploring a process mean, Technometrics, 54 (2012), 279–293. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2012.694722
![]() |
[45] |
M. Lopez-Mejia, E. Roldan-Valadez, Comparisons of apparent diffusion coefficient values in penumbra, infarct, and normal brain regions in acute ischemic stroke: confirmatory data using bootstrap confidence intervals, analysis of variance, and analysis of means, J. Stroke Cerebrovasc., 25 (2016), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.10.033 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.10.033
![]() |
[46] |
M. N. Akram, M. Amin, A. Elhassanein, M. A. Ullah, A new modified ridge-type estimator for the beta regression model: simulation and application, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 1035–1057. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022062 doi: 10.3934/math.2022062
![]() |
[47] |
A. Iqbal, T. Mahmood, Z. Ali, M. Riaz, On enhanced GLM-based monitoring: an application to additive manufacturing process, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010122 doi: 10.3390/sym14010122
![]() |
[48] |
T. Mahmood, A. Iqbal, S. A. Abbasi, M. Amin, Efficient GLM‐based control charts for Poisson processes, Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int., 38 (2022), 389–404. doi: 10.1002/qre.2985
![]() |
[49] |
A. Iqbal, T. Mahmood, H. Z. Nazir, N. Chakraborty, On the improved generalized linear model‐based monitoring methods for Poisson distributed processes, Concurr. Comp. Pract. E., 34 (2022), e6889. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6889 doi: 10.1002/cpe.6889
![]() |
[50] |
T. Mahmood, N. Balakrishnan, M. Xie, The generalized linear model‐based exponentially weighted moving average and cumulative sum charts for the monitoring of high‐quality processes, Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus., 37 (2021), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2612 doi: 10.1002/asmb.2612
![]() |
[51] |
A. Jamal, T. Mahmood, M. Riaz, H. M. Al-Ahmadi, GLM-based flexible monitoring methods: an application to real-time highway safety surveillance, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13020362 doi: 10.3390/sym13020362
![]() |
[52] |
T. Mahmood, Generalized linear model based monitoring methods for high‐yield processes, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 36 (2020), 1570–1591. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2646 doi: 10.1002/qre.2646
![]() |
[53] |
Q. Zhao, C. Zhang, J. Wu, X. Wang, Robust and efficient estimation for nonlinear model based on composite quantile regression with missing covariates, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 8127–8146. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022452 doi: 10.3934/math.2022452
![]() |
[54] |
P. Dutta, S. Panja, G. Sastry, An investigation of machining time and surface roughness in wire-EDM for inconel 800, Appl. Mech. Mater., 789 (2015), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.789-790.20 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.789-790.20
![]() |
[55] |
C. Zheng, J. Zhu, J. Zhu, Promote sign consistency in cure rate model with Weibull lifetime, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 3186–3202. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022176 doi: 10.3934/math.2022176
![]() |
[56] | G. A. Milliken, D. E. Johnson, Analysis of messy data volume 1: designed experiments, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2009. |
[57] | D. C. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments, John Wiley & Sons, 2012. |
[58] | P. R. Nelson, P. S. Wludyka, K. A. F. Copeland, The analysis of means: a graphical method for comparing means, rates, and proportions, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2005. |
[59] |
M. Riaz, Monitoring process mean level using auxiliary information, Statist. Neerlandica, 62 (2008), 458–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2008.00390.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2008.00390.x
![]() |
[60] |
M. Riaz, An improved control chart structure for process location parameter, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 27 (2011), 1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1193 doi: 10.1002/qre.1193
![]() |
[61] |
R. A. Sanusi, N. Abbas, M. Riaz, On efficient CUSUM-type location control charts using auxiliary information, Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag., 15 (2018), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2017.1304039 doi: 10.1080/16843703.2017.1304039
![]() |
[62] |
R. A. Sanusi, M. R. Abujiya, M. Riaz, N. Abbas, Combined Shewhart CUSUM charts using auxiliary variable, Comput. Ind. Eng., 105 (2017), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.018 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.018
![]() |
[63] |
R. A. Sanusi, M. Riaz, N. A. Adegoke, M. Xie, An EWMA monitoring scheme with a single auxiliary variable for industrial processes, Comput. Ind. Eng., 114 (2017), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.001
![]() |
[64] | P. J. Rousseeuw, F. R. Hamplel, E. M. Ronchetti, W. A. Stahel, Robust statistics: The approach based on influence functions, New York: Wiley, 1986. |
[65] | P. J. Huber, E. M. Ronchetti, Robust Statistics, New York: Wiley, 2009. |
[66] | R. G. Staudte, S. J. Sheather, Robust estimation and testing, New York: Wiley, 1991. |
[67] |
G. E. P. Box, M. E. Muller, A note on the generation of random normal deviates, Annal. Math. Stat., 29 (1958), 610–611. https://doi.org/10.1214/AOMS/1177706645 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706645
![]() |
[68] |
S. Pfyffer, R. Gatto, An efficient simulation algorithm for the generalized von Mises distribution of order two, Comput. Statist., 28 (2013), 255–268. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-011-0297-6 doi: 10.1007/s00180-011-0297-6
![]() |
[69] |
A. I. Fleishman, A method for simulating non-normal distributions, Psychometrika, 43 (1978), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293811 doi: 10.1007/BF02293811
![]() |
[70] |
H. Barakat, O. Khaled, H. Ghonem, Predicting future order statistics with random sample size, AIMS Mathematics, 6 (2021), 5133–5147. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021304 doi: 10.3934/math.2021304
![]() |
[71] |
W. Z. Zhao, D. Liu, H. M. Wang, Sieve bootstrap test for multiple change points in the mean of long memory sequence, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 10245–10255. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022570 doi: 10.3934/math.2022570
![]() |
[72] |
J. V. Bradley, Robustness, Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psy., 31 (1978), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1978.tb00581.x doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1978.tb00581.x
![]() |
[73] |
L. M. Sullivan, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials, Stat. Med., 22 (2003), 1317–1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1433 doi: 10.1002/sim.1433
![]() |
[74] |
J.-H. Guo, W.-M. Luh, An invertible transformation two-sample trimmed t-statistic under heterogeneity and nonnormality, Statist. Probab. Lett., 49 (2000), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7152(00)00022-5 doi: 10.1016/S0167-7152(00)00022-5
![]() |
[75] |
B. D. Zumbo, D. Coulombe, Investigation of the robust rank-order test for non-normal populations with unequal variances: the case of reaction time, Can. J. Experiment. Psych., 51 (1997), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.51.2.139 doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.51.2.139
![]() |
[76] | T. Vorapongsathorn, S. Taejaroenkul, C. Viwatwongkasem, A comparison of type Ⅰ error and power of Bartlett's test, Levene's test and Cochran's test under violation of assumptions, Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 26 (2004), 537–547. |
[77] | A. Field, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013. |
1. | Ali Ahmad, Ali N. A. Koam, Ibtisam Masmali, Muhammad Azeem, Haleemah Ghazwani, Connection number topological aspect for backbone DNA networks, 2023, 46, 1292-8941, 10.1140/epje/s10189-023-00381-9 | |
2. | Ibtisam Masmali, Muhammad Azeem, Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Ali Ahmad, Ali N. A. Koam, Study of some graph theoretical parameters for the structures of anticancer drugs, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-64086-5 | |
3. | Hani Shaker, Sabeen Javaid, Usman Babar, Muhammad Kamran Siddiqui, Asim Naseem, Characterizing superlattice topologies via fifth M-Zagreb polynomials and structural indices, 2023, 138, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04645-3 | |
4. | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Ibtisam Masmali, Muhammad Azeem, Mehwish Sarfraz, Naeem Jan, Several intuitionistic fuzzy hamy mean operators with complex interval values and their application in assessing the quality of tourism services, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0305319, 10.1371/journal.pone.0305319 | |
5. | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Maryam Salem Alatawi, Adnan Khalil, Muhammad Azeem, Ammar Alsinai, On the Constant Partition Dimension of Some Generalized Families of Toeplitz Graph, 2024, 2024, 2314-4629, 10.1155/2024/4721104 | |
6. | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Raed Qahiti, Muhammad Azeem, Waleed Hamali, Shonak Bansal, Enhanced Chemical Insights into Fullerene Structures via Modified Polynomials, 2024, 2024, 1076-2787, 10.1155/2024/9220686 | |
7. | Ali Ahmad, Ali N. A. Koam, Muhammad Azeem, Ibtisam Masmali, Rehab Alharbi, Eyas Mahmoud, Edge based metric dimension of various coffee compounds, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0294932, 10.1371/journal.pone.0294932 | |
8. | Muhammad Shoaib Sardar, Khalil Hadi Hakami, Vinod Kumar Tiwari, QSPR Analysis of Some Alzheimer’s Compounds via Topological Indices and Regression Models, 2024, 2024, 2090-9063, 10.1155/2024/5520607 | |
9. | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Shahid Zaman, Ibtisam Masmali, Haleemah Ghazwani, Fundamental aspects of the molecular topology of fuchsine acid dye with connection numbers, 2024, 47, 1292-8941, 10.1140/epje/s10189-024-00418-7 | |
10. | Haleemah Ghazwani, Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Ali Ahmad, Muhammad Azeem, Ali N. A. Koam, Applications of magnesium iodide structure via modified-polynomials, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-64344-6 | |
11. | Ali N.A. Koam, Muhammad Azeem, Ali Ahmad, Ibtisam Masmali, Connection number-based molecular descriptors of skin cancer drugs, 2024, 15, 20904479, 102750, 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102750 | |
12. | Khawlah Alhulwah, Ali N.A. Koam, Nasreen Almohanna, Muhammad Faisal Nadeem, Ali Ahmad, Topological indices and their correlation with structural properties of carbon nanotube Y-junctions, 2025, 70, 22113797, 108141, 10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108141 |
L(U1), L(U2) | Frequency |
(1, 4) | 4 |
(2, 2) | 4 |
(2, 4) | 4(p+q-6) |
(4, 4) | 2(p-3)(q-3) |
L(U1), L(U2) | Frequency |
(1, 4) | 4 |
(2, 4) | 12(t-2) |
(3, 4) | 6(t-2)(t-3) |
(4, 4) | 2/3(t3−9t2+26t−24) |