We investigate the Riccati matrix equation XA−1X=B in which the conventional matrix products are generalized to the semi-tensor products ⋉. When A and B are positive definite matrices satisfying the factor-dimension condition, this equation has a unique positive definite solution, which is defined to be the metric geometric mean of A and B. We show that this geometric mean is the maximum solution of the Riccati inequality. We then extend the notion of the metric geometric mean to positive semidefinite matrices by a continuity argument and investigate its algebraic properties, order properties and analytic properties. Moreover, we establish some equations and inequalities of metric geometric means for matrices involving cancellability, positive linear map and concavity. Our results generalize the conventional metric geometric means of matrices.
Citation: Pattrawut Chansangiam, Arnon Ploymukda. Riccati equation and metric geometric means of positive semidefinite matrices involving semi-tensor products[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23519-23533. doi: 10.3934/math.20231195
[1] | Arnon Ploymukda, Pattrawut Chansangiam . Metric geometric means with arbitrary weights of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26153-26167. doi: 10.3934/math.20231333 |
[2] | Arnon Ploymukda, Kanjanaporn Tansri, Pattrawut Chansangiam . Weighted spectral geometric means and matrix equations of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11452-11467. doi: 10.3934/math.2024562 |
[3] | Tong Wu, Yong Wang . Super warped products with a semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10534-10553. doi: 10.3934/math.2022587 |
[4] | Yajun Xie, Changfeng Ma, Qingqing Zheng . On the nonlinear matrix equation $ X^{s}+A^{H}F(X)A = Q $. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18392-18407. doi: 10.3934/math.2023935 |
[5] | Wenxv Ding, Ying Li, Anli Wei, Zhihong Liu . Solving reduced biquaternion matrices equation $ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k}A_iXB_i = C $ with special structure based on semi-tensor product of matrices. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3258-3276. doi: 10.3934/math.2022181 |
[6] | Mohd Danish Siddiqi, Meraj Ali Khan, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Khalid Masood . Geometrization of string cloud spacetime in general relativity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29042-29057. doi: 10.3934/math.20231487 |
[7] | Rajesh Kumar, Sameh Shenawy, Lalnunenga Colney, Nasser Bin Turki . Certain results on tangent bundle endowed with generalized Tanaka Webster connection (GTWC) on Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30364-30383. doi: 10.3934/math.20241465 |
[8] | Muhammad Asad Iqbal, Abid Ali, Ibtesam Alshammari, Cenap Ozel . Construction of new Lie group and its geometric properties. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6088-6108. doi: 10.3934/math.2024298 |
[9] | Yimeng Xi, Zhihong Liu, Ying Li, Ruyu Tao, Tao Wang . On the mixed solution of reduced biquaternion matrix equation $ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^nA_iX_iB_i = E $ with sub-matrix constraints and its application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27901-27923. doi: 10.3934/math.20231427 |
[10] | Fengxia Zhang, Ying Li, Jianli Zhao . The semi-tensor product method for special least squares solutions of the complex generalized Sylvester matrix equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5200-5215. doi: 10.3934/math.2023261 |
We investigate the Riccati matrix equation XA−1X=B in which the conventional matrix products are generalized to the semi-tensor products ⋉. When A and B are positive definite matrices satisfying the factor-dimension condition, this equation has a unique positive definite solution, which is defined to be the metric geometric mean of A and B. We show that this geometric mean is the maximum solution of the Riccati inequality. We then extend the notion of the metric geometric mean to positive semidefinite matrices by a continuity argument and investigate its algebraic properties, order properties and analytic properties. Moreover, we establish some equations and inequalities of metric geometric means for matrices involving cancellability, positive linear map and concavity. Our results generalize the conventional metric geometric means of matrices.
In classical matrix theory, the conventional matrix multiplication is a fundamental operation for processing of one/two-dimensional data. However, in modern data science, the conventional product is difficult to work with big or multidimensional data in order to extract information. In the early 2000s, Cheng [1] proposed the semi-tensor product (STP) of matrices as a tool for dealing with higher-dimensional data. The STP is a generalization of the conventional matrix multiplication, so that the multiplied matrices do not need to satisfy the matching-dimension condition. The symbol for this operation is ⋉. The STP keeps all fundamental properties of the conventional matrix multiplication. In addition, it possesses some incomparable advantages over the latter, such as interchangeability and complete compatibility. Due to these advantages, the STP is widely used in various fields, such as engineering [2], image encryption [3,4], Boolean networks [5,6], networked games [7,8], classical logic and fuzzy mathematics [9,10], finite state machines [11,12], finite systems [13] and others.
Matrix equations are fundamental tools in mathematics and they are applied in diverse fields. Recently, the theory of linear matrix equations with respect to the STP were investigated by many authors. Such theory includes necessary/sufficient conditions for existence and uniqueness of solutions (concerning ranks and linear independence) and methods to solve the matrix equations. The solutions of the matrix linear equation A⋉X=B were studied by Yao et al. [14]. Li et al. [15] investigated a system of two matrix equations A⋉X=B and X⋉C=D. Ji et al. [16] discussed the solvability of matrix equation A⋉X⋉B=C. Recently, the theory for the Sylvester equation A⋉X+X⋉B=C, the Lyapunov one A⋉X+X⋉AT=C and the Sylvester-transpose one A⋉X+XT⋉B=C was investigated in [17] and [18]. For nonlinear matrix equations, higher order algebraic equations can be applied widely in file encoding, file transmission and decoupling of logical networks. Wang et al. [19] investigated a nonlinear equation A⋉X⋉X=B.
Let Hn×n,PSn×n and Pn×n be the set of n×n Hermitian matrices, positive semidefinite matrices and positive definite matrices, respectively. This present research focuses on a famous nonlinear equation known as the Riccati equation:
XA−1X=B. | (1.1) |
In fact, this equation determines the solution of the linear-quadratic-Gaussian control problem which is one of the most fundamental problems in control theory, e.g., [20,21]. It is known that the metric geometric mean
A♯B=A1/2(A−1/2BA−1/2)1/2A1/2 | (1.2) |
is the unique positive solution of (1.1). This mean was introduced by Pusz and Woronowicz [22] and Ando [23] as the largest Hermitian matrix:
A♯B=max{X∈Hn×n:[AXXB]∈PS2n×2n}, |
where the maximal element is taken in the sense of the Löwner partial order. A significant property of the metric geometric mean is that A♯B is a midpoint of A and B for a natural Finsler metric. Many theoretical and computational research topics on the metric geometric mean have been widely studied, e.g., [24,25,26,27].
The metric geometric mean on PSn×n is a mean in Kubo-Ando's sense [28]:
(1) joint monotonicity: A⩽C and B⩽D implies A♯B⩽C♯D;
(2) transformer inequality: T(A♯B)T⩽(TAT)♯(TBT);
(3) joint continuity from above: Ak↓A and Bk↓B implies Ak♯Bk↓A♯B;
(4) normalization: In♯In=In.
Here, ⩽ is the Löwner partial order and Ak↓A indicates that (Ak) is a decreasing sequence converging to A.
There are another axiomatic approaches for means in various frameworks. Lawson and Lim [29,30] investigated a set of axioms for an algebraic system called a reflection quasigroup. The set Pn×n with an operation A∙B=AB−1A form a reflection quasigroup in the following sense:
(1) idempotency: A∙A=A;
(2) left distributivity: A∙(B∙C)=(A∙B)∙(A∙C);
(3) left symmetry: A∙(A∙B)=B;
(4) the equation X∙A=B has a unique solution X.
From the axiom 4, we have that A♯B is a unique solution of the Riccati equation XA−1X=B and call A♯B the mean or the midpoint of A and B.
In this present research, we investigate the Riccati equation with respect to the STP:
X⋉A−1⋉X=B, |
where A and B are given positive definite matrices of different sizes, and X is an unknown square matrix. We show that this equation has a unique positive definite solution, which is defined to be the metric geometric mean of A and B. Then, we extend this notion to the case of positive semidefinite matrices by a continuity argument. We establish fundamental properties of this mean. Moreover, we investigate certain equations and inequalities involving metric geometric means.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we setup basic notation and give basic results on STP and Kronecker products. Positive (semi) definiteness of matrices concerning semi-tensor products is also presented in this section. In Section 3, we define the metric geometric mean for positive definite matrices from the Riccati equation. In Section 4, we extend the notion of metric geometric mean to positive semidefinite matrices and provide fundamental properties of geometric means. In Section 5, we present matrix equations and inequalities of metric geometric mean involving cancellability, concavity and positive linear maps. We conclude the whole work in Section 6.
Throughout, let Cm×n be the set of m×n complex matrices. We consider the following subsets of Cm×n: Hn×n the n×n Hermitian matrices, GLn×n the n×n invertible matrices, PSn×n the n×n positive semidefinite matrices and Pn×n the n×n positive definite matrices. Define Cn=Cn×1, the set of n-dimensional complex vectors. For any A,B∈Hn×n, the Löwner partial order A⩾B means that A−B∈PSn×n, while the strict order A>B indicates that A−B∈Pn×n. A matrix pair (A,B)∈Cm×n×Cp×q is said to satisfy factor-dimension condition if n|p or p|n. In this case, we write A≻kB when n=kp and A≺kB when p=kn. Denote AT and A∗ the transpose and conjugate transpose of A, respectively. We denote the n×n identity matrix by In.
This subsection is a brief review on semi-tensor products and Kronecker products of matrices.
Definition 2.1. Let X∈C1,m and Y∈Cn. If X≻kY, we split X into X1,X2,…,Xn∈C1,k and define the STP of X and Y as
X⋉Y=n∑i=1yiXi∈C1,k. |
If X≺kY, we split Y into Y1,Y2,…,Ym∈Ck and define the STP of X and Y as
X⋉Y=m∑i=1xiYi∈Ck. |
From the STP between vectors, we define the STP between matrices as follows.
Definition 2.2. Let a pair (A,B)∈Cm×n×Cp×q satisfy the factor-dimensional condition. Then, we define the STP of A and B to be an m×q block matrix
A⋉B=[Ai⋉Bj]m,qi,j=1, |
where Ai is i-th row of A and Bj is the j-th column of B.
Lemma 2.1. (e.g., [31,32]) Let A∈Cm×n,B∈Cp×q,P∈Cm×m,Q∈Cn×n. Provided that all matrix operations are well-defined, we have
(1) the operation (A,B)↦A⋉B is bilinear and associative;
(2) (A⋉B)∗=B∗⋉A∗;
(3) if P∈GLm×m and Q∈GLn×n, then (P⋉Q)−1=Q−1⋉P−1;
(4) if P≺kQ, then det(P⋉Q)=(detP)k(detQ).
Recall that for any matrices A=[aij]∈Cm×n and B∈Cp×q, their Kronecker product is defined by
A⊗B=[aijB]∈Cmp,nq. |
Lemma 2.2. (e.g., [31,32]) Let A∈Cm×n and B∈Cp×q.
(1) If A≻kB then A⋉B=A(B⊗Ik).
(2) If A≺kB then A⋉B=(A⊗Ik)B.
Lemma 2.3. (e.g., [33]) Let A∈Cm×n,B∈Cp×q,P∈Cm×m and Q∈Cn×n. Then, we have
(1) the operation (A,B)↦A⊗B is bilinear and associative;
(2) (A⊗B)∗=A∗⊗B∗;
(3) rank(A⊗B)=rank(A)rank(B);
(4) A⊗B=0 if and only if either A=0 or B=0;
(5) if P∈GLm×m and Q∈GLn×n, then (P⊗Q)−1=P−1⊗Q−1;
(6) if P⩾0 and Q⩾0, then P⊗Q⩾0 and (P⊗Q)1/2=P1/2⊗Q1/2;
(7) if P>0 and Q>0, then P⊗Q>0;
(8) det(P⊗Q)=(detP)m(detQ)n.
In this subsection, we provide positive (semi) definiteness of matrices involving semi-tensor products.
Proposition 2.1. Let A∈PSn×n,B∈PSm×m,X∈Cm×m and S,T∈Hn×n. Provided that all matrix operations are well-defined, we have
(1) X∗⋉A⋉X⩾0;
(2) A⋉B⩾0 if and only if A⋉B=B⋉A;
(3) if S⩾T then X∗⋉S⋉X⩾X∗⋉T⋉X.
Proof. 1) Assume that A≺kX. Since (X∗⋉A⋉X)∗=X∗⋉A⋉X, we have that X∗⋉A⋉X is Hermitian. Let u∈Cm and set v=X⋉u. Using positive semidefiniteness of Kronecker products (Lemma 2.3), we obtain that A⊗Ik⩾0. Then, by Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2,
u∗(X∗⋉A⋉X)u=(X⋉u)∗⋉A⋉(X⋉u)=v∗(A⊗Ik)v⩾0. |
This implies that X∗⋉A⋉X⩾0. For the case A≻kX, the proof is similar to the case A≺kX.
2) Suppose that A≺kB. (⇒) Since A,B and A⋉B are Hermitian, we have by Lemma 1 that A⋉B=(A⋉B)∗=B∗⋉A∗=B⋉A.
(⇐) We know that B and B1/2 are commuting matrices. Since A⋉B=B⋉A, we get A⋉B1/2=B1/2⋉A. Thus, A⋉B=A⋉B1/2⋉B1/2=B1/2⋉A⋉B1/2. Using the assertion 1, A⋉B=B1/2⋉A⋉B1/2⩾0. For the case A≻kB, the proof is similar to the case A≺kB.
3) Since S⩾T, we have S−T⩾0. Applying the assertion 1, we get X∗⋉(S−T)⋉X⩾0, i.e., X∗⋉S⋉X⩾X∗⋉T⋉X.
Proposition 2.2. Let A∈Pn×n,B∈Pm×m,X∈Cp×q,Y∈GLp×p and S,T∈Hn×n. Provided that all matrix operations are well-defined, we have:
(1) If rankX=q then X∗⋉A⋉X>0.
(2) Y∗⋉A⋉Y>0.
(3) A⋉B>0 if and only if A⋉B=B⋉A.
(4) If S>T then Y∗⋉S⋉Y>Y∗⋉T⋉Y.
Proof. 1) Suppose A≺kX and rankX=q. Applying Lemma 2.1, X∗⋉A⋉X∈Hq×q. Let u∈Cq−{0}. Set v=X⋉u. Since rankX=q, we have v≠0. Since A⊗Ik>0 (Lemma 2.1), we obtain
u∗(X∗⋉A⋉X)u=v∗⋉A⋉v=v∗(A⊗Ik)v>0. |
Thus, X∗⋉A⋉X>0. For the case A≻kX, we have by Lemma 2.1 that X∗⋉A⋉X∈Hkq×kq. Since rankX=q, we get by Lemma 2.3 that rank(X⊗Ik)=kq. Thus, v=(X⊗Ikq)u≠0. Since A>0 and v≠0, we obtain u∗(X∗⋉A⋉X)u=v∗Av>0, i.e., X∗⋉A⋉X is positive definite.
2) Since Y is invertible, we have rankY=p. Using the assertion 1, Y∗⋉A⋉Y>0.
3)–4). The proof is similar to Proposition 2.1.
In this section, we define the metric geometric mean of two positive definite matrices when the two matrices satisfy factor-dimension condition, as a solution of the Riccati equation. Our results include the conventional metric geometric means of matrices as special case.
Definition 3.1. Let m,n,k∈N be such that m=nk. We define a binary operation
∙:Pm×m×Pm×m→Pm×m,(X,Y)↦XY−1X, |
and define an external binary operation
∗:Pm×m×Pn×n→Pm×m,(X,Y)↦X⋉Y−1⋉X. |
For convenience, we write ∙ and ∗ to the same notation ∙.
Proposition 3.1. Let m,n,k∈N be such that m=nk. Then,
(1) A∙A=A;
(2) α(A∙B)=(αA)∙(αB) for all α>0;
(3) A∙(A∙B)=B⊗Ik;
(4) (A∙B)−1=A−1∙B−1;
(5) A∙(B∙C)=(A∙B)∙(A∙C);
(6) if A⩽B then T∙A⩾T∙B for all T∈Pm×m.
Proof. The proof is immediate.
Theorem 3.2. Let A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m be such that A≺kB. Then, the Riccati equation X∙A=B has a unique solution X∈Pm×m.
Proof. Set X=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2. Since B⩾0 and A∈GLn×n, we have by Proposition 2.2 that A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2>0. Thus, (A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2>0. Using Proposition 2.2 again, we obtain
X=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2>0. |
Applying Lemma 2.1, we get
X∙A=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉In⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2=B. |
Thus, A♯B:=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2 is a solution of X∙A=B. Suppose that Y∈Pm×m satisfying X∙X=B=Y∙A. Consider
(A−1/2⋉X⋉A−1/2)2=A−1/2⋉(X∙A)⋉A−1/2=A−1/2⋉(Y∙A)⋉A−1/2=(A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2)2. |
From the uniqueness of positive-definite square root, we get A−1/2⋉X⋉A−1/2=A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2. Thus,
X=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉X⋉A−1/2)⋉A1/2=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2)⋉A1/2=Y. |
For the special case m=n of Theorem 3.2, the Riccati equation A≺kB is reduced to XA−1X=B which has been already studied by many authors. e.g., [22], [25], [34].
Definition 3.3. Let A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m be such that A≺kB. The metric geometric mean of A and B is defined to be
A♯B=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2. | (3.1) |
Kubo and Ando [28] provided a significant theory of operator means: given an operator monotone function on (0,∞) such that f(1)=1, the operator mean mf is defined by
AmfB=A1/2f(A−1/2BA−1/2)A1/2. |
For the metric geometric mean, we can write
A♯B=A1/2⋉f(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)⋉A1/2, |
where f=√x, A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m with A≺kB.
Lemma 3.1. (Löwner-Heinz inequality, e.g., [35]) Let S,T∈PSn×n. If S⩽T then S1/2⩽T1/2.
The following theorem gives necessity and sufficiency condition for the Riccati inequality.
Theorem 3.4. Let A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m be such that A≺kB. Let X∈Hm×m. Then, X⩽A♯B if and only if there exists Y∈Hm×m such that X⩽Y and Y∙A⩽B.
Proof. Suppose X⩽A♯B. Set Y=A♯B. We have, by Theorem 3.2, Y∙A=B and Y⩾X. Conversely, suppose that there exists Y∈Hm×m such that X⩽Y and Y∙A⩽B. By Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.1, we have
A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2=(A−1/2⋉(Y∙A)⋉A−1/2)1/2⩽(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2. |
Using Proposition 2.1, we obtain
X⩽Y⩽A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2=A♯B. |
From Theorem 3.4, we obtain that A♯B is the largest (in the Löwner order) solution of the Riccati inequality Y∙A⩽B.
In this section, the expression Ak→A means that the matrix sequence (Ak)k∈N converges to the matrix A. For any sequence (Ak)k∈N in Hn×n, we write Ak↓A indicates that (Ak) is a decreasing sequence (with respect to the Löwner partial order) and Ak→A.
Lemma 4.1. Let m=nk. Then, the operation ♯:Pn×n×Pm×m→Pm×m is jointly monotone. Moreover, for any sequences (Ak)k∈N∈Pn×n and (Bk)k∈N∈Pm×m such that Ak↓A and Bk↓B, the sequence (Ak♯Bk)k∈N has a common limit, namely, A♯B.
Proof. First, let A1,A2∈Pn×n and B1,B2∈Pm×m. Suppose A1⩽A2 and B1⩽B2. By Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 3.2, we have
(A1♯B1)∙A2⩽(A1♯B1)∙A1=B1⩽B2. |
Since A1♯B1 satisfies the Riccati inequality X∙A2⩽B2, we obtain A1♯B1⩽A2♯B2 by Theorem 3.4. Next, let (Ak)k∈N and (Bk)k∈N be sequences in Pn×n and Pm×m, respectively. Assume that Ak↓A and Bk↓B. Using the monotonicity of the metric geometric mean, we conclude that the sequence (Ak♯Bk) is decreasing. In addition, it is bounded below by the zero matrix. The order completeness (with respect to the Löwner partial order) of Cn×n implies that Ak♯Bk converges to a positive definite matrix. Recall that the matrix multiplication is continuous. It follows from Lemma 2.2 that A−1/2k⋉Bk⋉A−1/2k converges to A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2 in Frobenius norm (or another norm). By Löwner-Heinz inequality (Lemma 3.1), we obtain
A1/2k⋉(A−1/2k⋉Bk⋉A−1/2k)1/2⋉A1/2k→A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2, |
i.e., Ak♯Bk→A♯B.
It is natural to extend the metric geometric mean of positive definite matrices to positive semidefinite matrices by taking limits.
Definition 4.1. Let A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m be such that A≺kB. We define the metric geometric mean of A and B to be
A♯B=limε→0+(A+εIn)♯(B+εIm). | (4.1) |
We see that A+εIn and B+εIm are decreasing sequences where ε↓0+. Since A+εIn↓A and B+εIm↓B, we obtain by Lemma 4.1 that the limit (4.1) is well-defined. Fundamental properties of metric geometric means are as follows.
Theorem 4.2. Let A,C∈PSn×n and B,D∈PSm×m with A≺kB.
(1) Positivity: A♯B⩾0.
(2) Fixed-point property: A♯A=A.
(3) Positive homogeneity: α(A♯B)=(αA)♯(αB) for all α⩾0.
(4) Congruent invariance: T∗⋉(A♯B)⋉T=(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T) for all T∈GLm×m.
(5) Self duality: (A♯B)−1=A−1♯B−1.
(6) Permutation invariance: A♯B=B♯(A⊗Ik).
(7) Consistency with scalars: If A⊗Ik and B commute, then A♯B=A1/2⋉B1/2.
(8) Monotonicity: If A⩽C and B⩽D, then A♯B⩽C♯D.
(9) Concavity: the map (A,B)↦A♯B is concave.
(10) Continuity from above: If Ak↓A and Bk↓B then Ak♯Bk↓A♯B.
(11) Betweenness: If A⊗Ik⩽B, then A⊗Ik⩽A♯B⩽B.
(12) Determinantal identity: det(A♯B)=√(detA)kdetB.
Proof. By continuity, we may assume that A,C∈Pn×n and B,D∈Pm×m. It is clear that (1) holds.
(2) Since A∙A=A, we have by Theorem 3.2 that A♯A=A.
(3) For α=0, we have α(A♯B)=0=(αA)♯(αB). Let α>0 and X=A♯B. Since
(αX)∙(αA)=α(X∙A)=αB, |
we have by Theorem 3.2 that αX=(αA)♯(αB), i.e., α(A♯B)=(αA)♯(αB).
(4) Let T∈GLm×m and X=A♯B. Applying Lemma 2.1, we have
(T∗⋉X⋉T)∙(T∗⋉A⋉T)=T∗⋉(X∙A)⋉T=T∗⋉B⋉T. |
This implies that T∗⋉X⋉T=(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T). Hence, T∗⋉(A♯B)⋉T=(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T).
(5) Let X=A♯B. Applying Theorem 3.2, we have X−1∙A−1=B−1. This implies that X−1=A−1♯B−1, i.e., (A♯B)−1=A−1♯B−1.
(6) Using Lemma 2.2 and Theorem 3.2, we have
X−1∙B−1=X−1∙(X∙A)−1=X−1∙(X−1∙A−1)=A−1⊗Ik. |
It follows that X−1=B♯(A−1⊗Ik), i.e., (A♯B)−1=B−1♯(A−1⊗Ik). Using (5), we get A−1♯B−1=B−1♯(A−1⊗Ik). By replacing A−1 and B−1 by A and B, respectively, we obtain A♯B=B♯(A⊗Ik).
(7) Since A⊗Ik and B commute, we have that A1/2⋉B1/2=B1/2⋉A1/2. Then,
(A1/2⋉B1/2)∙A=B1/2⋉A1/2⋉A−1⋉A1/2⋉B1/2=B. |
This implies that A♯B=A1/2⋉B1/2.
(8) Follows from Lemma 4.1.
(9) Let λ∈[0,1]. Since (A♯B)∙B=A⊗Ik and (C♯D)∙D=C⊗Ik, we have
[A⊗IkA♯BA♯BB]⩾0 and [C⊗IkC♯DC♯DD]⩾0. |
Then,
0⩽λ[A⊗IkA♯BA♯BB]+(1−λ)[C⊗IkC♯DC♯DD]=[[λA+(1−λ)C]⊗IkλA♯B+(1−λ)C♯DλA♯B+(1−λ)C♯DλB+(1−λ)D]. |
We have
[λA+(1−λ)C]⊗Ik⩾[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D][λB+(1−λ)D)]−1[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D] |
and then
[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA+(1−λ)C]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⩾{[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2}2. |
It follows that
{[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA+(1−λ)C]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2}1/2⩾[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2. |
Thus, [λA+(1−λ)C]♯[λB+(1−λ)D]⩾λ(A♯C)+(1−λ)(C♯D).
(10) Follows from Lemma 4.1.
(11) Let A⊗Ik⩽B. By applying the monotonicity of metric geometric mean, we have
A⊗Ik=A♯(A⊗Ik)⩽A♯B⩽B♯B=B. |
(12) The determinantal identity follows directly from Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3.
Properties 2, 4, 8 and 10 illustrate that the metric geometric mean (4.1) is a mean in Kubo-Ando's sense. In addition, this mean possesses self-duality and concavity (properties 5 and 9). The following proposition gives another ways of expressing the metric geometric mean.
Proposition 4.1. Let A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m with A≺kB.
(1) There exists a unitary matrix U∈Cm×m such that
A♯B=A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2. |
(2) If all eigenvalues of A−1⋉B are positive,
A♯B=A⋉(A−1⋉B)1/2=(A⋉B−1)1/2⋉B. |
Proof. By continuity, we may assume that A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m.
(1) Set U=(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2⋉B−1/2. Since U∗U=Im and UU∗=Im, we have that U is unitary and
A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2=A♯B. |
(2) Assume that all eigenvalues of A−1⋉B are positive. Recall that if matrix X has positive eigenvalues, it has a unique square root. Since (A⋉(A−1⋉B)1/2)∙A=B, we have by Theorem 3.2 that A♯B=A⋉(A−1⋉B)1/2. Similarly, A♯B=(A⋉B−1)1/2⋉B.
Let (V,⟨⋅,⋅⟩) be an inner product space. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality states that for any x,y∈V,
|⟨x,y⟩|2⩽⟨x,x⟩⟨y,y⟩. | (4.2) |
Corollary 4.1. Let A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m with A≺kB. Then, for any x,y∈Cm,
|⟨(A♯B)x,y⟩|⩽√⟨(A⊗Ik)x,x⟩⟨By,y⟩. |
Proof. From Proposition 4.1(1), we can write A♯B=A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2 for some unitary U∈Cm×m. By applying Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (4.2), we get
|⟨(A♯B)x,y⟩|2=|⟨(A♯B)y,x⟩|2=|⟨(A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2)y,x⟩|2=|⟨UB1/2y,(A1/2⊗Ik)x⟩|2⩽⟨UB1/2y,UB1/2y⟩⟨(A⊗Ik)1/2x,(A⊗Ik)1/2x⟩=⟨(A⊗Ik)x,x⟩⟨By,y⟩. |
In this section, we investigate matrix equations and inequalities concerning metric geometric means.
Theorem 5.1. Let A,X1,X2∈PSn×n and B,Y1,Y2∈PSm×m be such that A≺kB.
(1) (left cancellability) If A♯Y1=A♯Y2 then Y1=Y2.
(2) (right cancellability) If X1♯B=X2♯B then X1=X2.
Proof. (1) Assume that A♯Y1=A♯Y2. We have
(A−1/2⋉Y1⋉A−1/2)1/2=(A−1/2⋉Y2⋉A−1/2)1/2. |
This implies that A−1/2⋉Y1⋉A−1/2=A−1/2⋉Y2⋉A−1/2. Applying Proposition 2.1(3), we get Y1=Y2.
(2) Suppose that X1♯B=X2♯B. We have by Theorem 4.2(6) that B♯(X1⊗Ik)=B♯(X2⊗Ik). Using the assertion 1, we get X⊗Ik=X2⊗Ik. Since (X−Y)⊗Ik=X⊗Ik−Y⊗Ik=0, we get by Lemma 2.3 that X=Y.
Theorem 5.1 shows that the metric geometric mean is cancellable, i.e., it is both left and right cancellable.
A map Ψ:Cn×n→Cm×m is called a positive linear map if it is linear and Ψ(X)∈PSm×m whenever X∈PSn×n. In addition, it said to be normalized if Ψ(In)=Im.
Lemma 5.1. (e.g., [36]) If Ψ:Cn×n→Cm×m is a normalized positive linear map then for all X∈PSn×n,
Ψ(X)2⩽Ψ(X2). |
Proposition 5.1. Let Φ:Cm×m→Cp×p be a positive linear map. Then, for any A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m such that A≺kB, we have
Φ(A♯B)⩽Φ(A⊗Ik)♯Φ(B). |
Proof. By continuity, we may assume that A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m. Consider the map Φ:Cm×m→Cp×p defined by
Φ(X):=Ψ(B)−1/2∙Ψ(B1/2∙X). |
We see that Φ is a normalized positive linear map. By Lemmas 3.1 and 5.1, we get Φ(X1/2)⩽Φ(X)1/2. Thus,
Φ((B−1/2∙A)1/2)⩽Φ(B−1/2∙A)1/2, |
i.e.,
Ψ(B)1/2∙Ψ(B1/2∙(B−1/2∙A)1/2)⩽(Ψ(B)1/2∙Ψ(A⊗Ik))1/2. |
It follows that Ψ(A♯B)=Ψ(B♯(A⊗Ik))⩽Ψ(B)♯Ψ(A⊗Ik)=Ψ(A⊗Ik)♯Ψ(B).
For the special map ΦT(X)=T∗XT, where T∈Cm×m, the result of Proposition 5.1 reduces to the transformer inequality T∗⋉(A♯B)⋉T⩽(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T).
A map Ψ:Cm×m×Cn×n→Cp×p is said to be concave if for any A,C∈Cm×m,B,D∈Cn×n and λ∈[0,1],
Ψ(λA+(1−λ)C),λB+(1−λ)D))⩾λΨ(A,B)+(1−λ)Ψ(C,D). |
Proposition 5.2. Let Ψ1:PSm×m→PSn×n and Ψ2:PSp×p→PSq×q be concave maps with n∣q. Then, the map (A,B)↦Ψ1(A)♯Ψ2(B) is concave.
Proof. Let A,C∈PSm×m,B,D∈PSp×p and λ∈[0,1]. Since Ψ1 and Ψ2 are concave, we have
Ψ1(λA+(1−λ)C)⩾λΨ1(A)+(1−λ)Ψ2(C) and Ψ2(λB+(1−λ)D)⩾λΨ2(B)+(1−λ)Ψ2(D). |
Applying concavity and monotonicity of the metric geometric mean (Theorem 4.2), we obtain
Ψ1(λA+(1−λ)C)♯Ψ2(λB+(1−λ)D)⩾[λΨ1(A)+(1−λ)Φ(C)]♯[λΨ2(B)+(1−λ)Ψ(D)]⩾λΨ1(A)♯Ψ2(B)+(1−λ)Ψ1(C)♯Ψ2(D). |
This shows the concavity of the map (A,B)↦Ψ1(A)♯Ψ2(B).
Corollary 5.1. (Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality) For each i=1,2,…,N, let Ai∈PSn×n and Bi∈PSm×m be such that Ai≺kBi. Then
N∑i=1(A2i♯B2i)⩽(N∑i=1A2i)♯(N∑i=1B2i). | (5.1) |
Proof. By using the concavity of metric geometric mean (Theorem 4.2(9)), we have
2∑i=1(Ai♯Bi)⩽(2∑i=1Ai)♯(2∑i=1Bi). |
By mathematical induction, we obtain
N∑i=1(Ai♯Bi)⩽(N∑i=1Ai)♯(N∑i=1Bi). | (5.2) |
Replacing Ai and Bi by A2i and B2i, respectively, in (5.2), we arrive the desire result.
We investigate the Riccati matrix equation X⋉A−1⋉X=B, where the operation ⋉ stands for the semi-tensor product. When A and B are positive definite matrices satisfying the factor-dimension condition, this equation has a unique positive solution, which is defined to be the metric geometric mean of A and B. We discuss that the metric geometric mean is the maximum solution of the Riccati inequality. By continuity of the metric geometric mean, we extend the notion of this mean to positive semidefinite matrices. We establish several properties of the metric geometric mean such as positivity, concavity, self-duality, congruence invariance, permutation invariance, betweenness and determinantal identity. In addition, this mean is a mean in the Kubo-Ando sense. Moreover, we investigate several matrix equations and inequalities concerning metric geometric means, concavity, cancellability, positive linear map and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Our results include the conventional metric geometric means of matrices as special case.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This research is supported by postdoctoral fellowship of School of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. The authors wish to express their thanks to the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript, giving valuable comments and helpful suggestions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
D. Cheng, Semi-tensor product of matrices and its application to Morgen's problem, Sci. China Ser. F, 44 (2001), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02714570 doi: 10.1007/BF02714570
![]() |
[2] |
H. T. Li, G. D. Zhao, M. Meng, J. Feng, A survey on applications of semi-tensor product method in engineering, Sci. China Inf. Sci., 61 (2018), 010202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9238-1 doi: 10.1007/s11432-017-9238-1
![]() |
[3] |
X. Y. Wang, S. Gao, Application of matrix semi-tensor product in chaotic image encryption, J. Franklin Inst., 356 (2019), 11638–11667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.10.006
![]() |
[4] |
C. Y. Zou, X. Y. Wang, H. F. Li, Image encryption algorithm with matrix semi-tensor product, Nonlinear Dyn., 105 (2021), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06542-9 doi: 10.1007/s11071-021-06542-9
![]() |
[5] | E. Fornasini, M. E. Valcher, Observability, reconstructibility and state observers of Boolean control networks, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 58 (2013), 1390–1401. |
[6] |
Y. Yan, J. Yue, Z. Chen, Algebraic method of simplifying Boolean networks using semi‐tensor product of Matrices, Asian J. Control, 21 (2019), 2569–2577. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2125 doi: 10.1002/asjc.2125
![]() |
[7] |
Y. L. Li, X. Y. Ding, H. T. Li, Robust consensus of networked evolutionary games with attackers and forbidden profiles, Entropy, 20 (2018), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20010015 doi: 10.3390/e20010015
![]() |
[8] |
G. D. Zhao, H. T. Li, P. Y. Duan, F. E. Alsaadi, Survey on applications of semi-tensor product method in networked evolutionary games, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 10 (2020), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.11948/20180201 doi: 10.11948/20180201
![]() |
[9] |
A. D. Ge, Y. Z. Wang, A. R. Wei, H. B. Liu, Control design for multi-variable fuzzy systems with application to parallel hybrid electric vehicles, Control Theory Technol., 30 (2013), 99–1004. https://doi.org/10.7641/CTA.2013.12101 doi: 10.7641/CTA.2013.12101
![]() |
[10] |
H. B. Fan, J. Feng, M. Meng, B. Wang, General decomposition of fuzzy relations: Semi-tensor product approach, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 384 (2020), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2018.12.012 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2018.12.012
![]() |
[11] |
Y. Y. Yan, Z. Q. Chen, J. M. Yue, Algebraic state space approach to model and control combined automata, Front. Comput. Sci., 11 (2017), 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5128-z doi: 10.1007/s11704-016-5128-z
![]() |
[12] |
Y. Y. Yan, D. Z. Cheng, J. Feng, H. T. Li, J. M. Yue, Survey on applications of algebraic state space theory of logical systems to finite state machines, Sci. China Inf. Sci., 66 (2023), 111201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3538-4 doi: 10.1007/s11432-022-3538-4
![]() |
[13] |
G. D. Zhao, H. T. Li, T. Hou, Survey of semi-tensor product method in robustness analysis on finite systems, Math. Biosci. Eng., 6 (2023), 11464–11481. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023508 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023508
![]() |
[14] |
J. Yao, J. Feng, M. Meng, On solutions of the matrix equation AX=B with respect to semi-tensor product, J. Franklin Inst., 353 (2016), 1109–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2015.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2015.04.004
![]() |
[15] |
J. F. Li, T. Li, W. Li, Y. M. Chen, R. Huang, Solvability of matrix equations AX=B, XC=D under semi-tensor product, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 65 (2017), 1705–1733. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2016.1253664 doi: 10.1080/03081087.2016.1253664
![]() |
[16] |
Z. D. Ji, J. F. Li, X. L. Zhou, F. J. Duan, T. Li, On solutions of matrix equation AXB=C under semi-tensor product, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 69 (2019), 1935–1963. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2019.1650881 doi: 10.1080/03081087.2019.1650881
![]() |
[17] |
P. Chansangiam, S. V. Sabau, Sylvester matrix equation under the semi-tensor product of matrices, An. Ştiinţ. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Iaşi. Mat. (N.S.), 68 (2022), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.47743/anstim.2022.00020 doi: 10.47743/anstim.2022.00020
![]() |
[18] |
J. Jaiprasert, P. Chansangiam, Solving the Sylvester-transpose matrix equation under the semi-tensor product, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061094 doi: 10.3390/sym14061094
![]() |
[19] |
J. Wang, J. Feng, H. Huang, Solvability of the matrix equation AX2=B with semi-tensor product, Electron. Res. Arch., 29 (2021), 2249–2267. https://doi:10.3934/era.2020114 doi: 10.3934/era.2020114
![]() |
[20] |
J. Zabczyk, Remarks on the algebraic Riccati equation in Hilbert space, Appl. Math. Optim., 2 (1975), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464270 doi: 10.1007/BF01464270
![]() |
[21] |
D. L. Lukes, D. L. Russell, The quadratic criterion for distributed systems, SIAM J. Control, 7 (1969), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1137/0307008 doi: 10.1137/0307008
![]() |
[22] |
W. Pusz, S. L. Woronowicz, Functional calculus for sesquilinear forms and the purification map, Rep. Math. Phys., 8 (1975), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(75)90061-0 doi: 10.1016/0034-4877(75)90061-0
![]() |
[23] | T. Ando, Topics on operator inequalities, Sapporo: Hokkaido University, 1979. |
[24] |
F. Soleymani, M. Sharifi, S. Shateyi, F. K. Haghani, An algorithm for computing geometric mean of two Hermitian positive definite matrices via matrix sign, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 978629. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/978629 doi: 10.1155/2014/978629
![]() |
[25] |
J. D. Lawson, Y. Lim, The geometric mean, matrices, metrics, and more, Amer. Math. Monthly, 108 (2001), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695553 doi: 10.2307/2695553
![]() |
[26] |
M. Fiedler, V. Pták, A new positive definite geometric mean of two positive definite matrices, Linear Algebra Appl., 251 (1997), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(95)00540-4 doi: 10.1016/0024-3795(95)00540-4
![]() |
[27] | R. Bhatia, Positive definite matrices, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827787 |
[28] |
F. Kubo, T. Ando, Means of positive linear operators, Math. Ann., 246 (1980), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01371042 doi: 10.1007/BF01371042
![]() |
[29] |
J. Lawson, Y. Lim, Symmetric sets with midpoints and algebraically equivalent theories, Results Math., 46 (2004), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03322869 doi: 10.1007/BF03322869
![]() |
[30] | J. Lawson, Y. Lim, Geometric means and reflection quasigroups, Quasigroups Related Systems, 14 (2006), 43–59. |
[31] |
D. Z. Cheng, H. S. Qi, A. C. Xue, A survey on semi-tensor product of matrices, J. Syst. Sci. Complex., 20 (2007), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-007-9027-0 doi: 10.1007/s11424-007-9027-0
![]() |
[32] | D. Z. Cheng, H. S. Qi, Y. Zhao, An introduction to semi-tensor product of matrices and its applications, Singapore: World Scientific, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1142/8323 |
[33] |
H. Zhang, F. Ding, On the Kronecker products and their applications, J. Appl. Math., 2013 (2013), 296185. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/296185 doi: 10.1155/2013/296185
![]() |
[34] |
N. Nakamura, Geometric operator mean induced from the Riccati equation, Sci. Math. Jpn., 66 (2007), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.32219/isms.66.1_83 doi: 10.32219/isms.66.1_83
![]() |
[35] | S. Izumino, N. Nakamura, Löwner-Heinz theorem and operator means, Sci. Math. Jpn., 5 (2001), 545–548. |
[36] |
M. Fujii, M. Nakamura, Y. Seo, Kadison's Schwarz inequality and Furuta's theorem, Sci. Math. Jpn., 64 (2006), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.32219/isms.64.1_141 doi: 10.32219/isms.64.1_141
![]() |
1. | Arnon Ploymukda, Kanjanaporn Tansri, Pattrawut Chansangiam, Weighted spectral geometric means and matrix equations of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 11452, 10.3934/math.2024562 | |
2. | Arnon Ploymukda, Pattrawut Chansangiam, Metric geometric means with arbitrary weights of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 26153, 10.3934/math.20231333 |