1.
Introduction
Chaos and shadowing property are important concepts in dynamical systems. Many scholars have studied their dynamical properties. See [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] for relevant results. For example, Li [1] proved that if the self-map f is w− chaotic, then the shift map σ is w− chaotic; Shah, Das and Das [2] proved that if a uniformly continuous self-map of a uniform locally compact Hausdorff space has topological weak specification property, then it admits a topologically distributionally scrambled set of type 3; Kostic [3] introduced two different notions of disjoint distributional chaos for sequences of continuous linear operators in Frechet spaces; Wang and Liu [4] generalized the notion of the ergodic shadowing property to the iterated function systems and proved some related theorems; Wang and Zeng [5] studied the relationship between average shadowing property and q_− average shadowing property; for any k≠0 and f∈H(X), Li [6] proposed that f is chaotic if and only if fk is chaotic; Li [7] proved that a chaotic semi-flow θ on a manifold M in the sense of Devaney with some assumptions is an expanding semi-flow; Li and Zhou [8] presented that if a continuous Lyapunov stable map f from a compact metric space X into itself is topologically transitive and has the asymptotic average shadowing property, then X is consisting of one point; Li [9] proved that if the set of all periodic points of ϕ×θ is dense in X×Y, then ϕ×θ is chaotic.
According to the concept of w− Chaos [1], we introduced the definition of (G,w)− Chaos. Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that S is an (G,w)− scrambled set if for any x,y∈S with x≠y, the following three conditions are satisfied: (1)wG(x,f)−wG(y,f) is uncountable; (2) wG(x,f)∩wG(y,f) is nonempty; (3)wG(x,f)⊄PG(f). The map f is said to be (G,w)− chaotic if there exists an uncountable (G,w)− scrambled set. Then we proved that if the self-map is (G,w)− chaotic, the shift map σ is (G,w)− chaotic in the inverse limit space under action group which generalizes the conclusion of w− Chaos given by Li [1].
Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The map f has G− Lipschitz shadowing property if there exists positive constant L>0 and δ0>0 such that for any 0<δ<δ0 and (G,δ)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of f there exists a point x∈X such that the sequence {xi}∞i=0 is (G,Lδ)− shadowed by the point x [17]. Finally, the dynamical properties of G− Lipschitz shadowing property are studied under topological G− conjugate and iterative systems. We derive that (1) If f is topologically G− conjugate to g, then the map f has G− Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G− Lipschitz shadowing property. (2) For any positive integer k⩾2, the map f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the iterative map fk has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property. These results enrich the theory of topological G− conjugate and iterative system.
Next, I will give the proof of above three conclusions in sections 2–4.
2.
(G, w)-Chaos in the inverse limit space under group action
Definition 2.1. [18] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space, G be a topological group and φ be a continuous map from G×X to X. The (X,G,φ)orX is called to be a metric G− space if the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) φ(e,x)=x for all x∈X where e is the identity of G;
(2) φ(g1,φ(g2,x))=φ(g1g2,x) where for all x∈X and all g1, g2∈G.
If X is compact, then X is also said to be a compact metric G− space. For the convenience, φ(g,x) is usually abbreviated as gx.
Definition 2.2. [19] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that Xf is the inverse limit spaces of X if we write
Where let lim←(X,f) denoted by the inverse limit spaces Xf.
The metric ˉd in Xf is defined by
where ˉx=(x0,x1,x2⋅⋅⋅)∈Xf and ˉy=(y0,y1,y2⋅⋅⋅)∈Xf.
The shift map σ:Xf→Xf is defined by
For every i⩾0 the projection map πi:Xf→X is defined by
Thus (Xf,ˉd) is compact metric space and the shift map σ is homeomorphism.
Definition 2.3. [19] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be equivariant map from X to X. Write
where Gi=G,i⩾0.
The map φ:ˉG×Xf→Xf is defined by
where ˉg=(g,g,g⋅⋅⋅)∈¯G and ˉx=(x0,x1,x2⋅⋅⋅)∈Xf.
Then (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) is a metric G− space.
Let (X,G,d,f) and (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) are shown as above. The space (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) is called to be the inverse limit spaces of (X,G,d,f) under group action.
Definition 2.4. [20] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be a continuous map from X to X.We say that the map f is an equivariant map if we have f(px)=pf(x) for all x∈X and all p∈G.
Definition 2.5. [21] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The point x is called to be an G− periodic point if there exists positive integer m and g∈G such that gfm(x)=x. Denoted by PG(f) the G− periodic point set of f.
Definition 2.6. [4] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The point y is said to be an G− limit point of the point x if there exists {ni}⊂N+ and {gi}⊂G such that limi→∞gifni(x)=y. Denoted by wG(x,f) the G− limit point set of the point x.
Definition 2.7. [21] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. If f(A)⊂A then we say that the set A is invariant to the map f.
Definition 2.8. [1] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that S is an w− scrambled set if for any x,y∈S with x≠y the following three conditions are satisfied:
(1) w(x,f)−w(y,f) is uncountable;
(2) w(x,f)∩w(y,f) is not empty;
(3) w(x,f)⊄P(f).
We say that the map f is w− chaotic if there exists an uncountable w− scrambled set.
Remark 2.9. According to the definition of w− Chaos in metric space, we give the concept of (G,w)− Chaos in metric G− space.
Definition 2.1. [1] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that S is an (G,w)− scrambled set if for any x,y∈S with x≠y the following three conditions are satisfied:
(1) wG(x,f)−wG(y,f) is uncountable;
(2) wG(x,f)∩wG(y,f) is not empty;
(3) wG(x,f)⊄PG(f).
We say that the map f is (G,w)− chaotic if there exists an uncountable (G,w)− scrambled set.
Definition 2.11. [22] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The set A is said to be a minimal set if for any x∈A we have ¯orb(x,f)=A.
Lemma 2.12. [21] Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action, f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X and ˉx=(x0,x1,x2⋅⋅⋅)∈Xf. Then we have
Lemma 2.13. [21] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space, f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X and x∈X. Then we have that wG(x,f) is closed and
Lemma 2.14. [21] Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action and f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X. Then we have
Theorem 2.15. Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action and f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X. If the self-map f is (G,w)− chaotic, then the shift map σ is (G,w)− chaotic.
Proof. Suppose that the self-map f is (G,w)− chaotic. Then there exists an uncountable (G,w)− scrambled set S. Write
Thus D′ is an uncountable set in Xf. Next, we will show that D′ is an (G,w)− scrambled set in Xf. Let
According to that f is an homeomorphism map, the point x0 and y0 are two different points in S. By the definition of (G,w)− scrambled set S, we have the following three conditions:
(1) wG(x0,f)−wG(y0,f) is uncountable;
(2) wG(x0,f)∩wG(y0,f) is not empty;
(3) wG(x0,f)⊄PG(f).
Firstly, we will show that wG(ˉx,σ)−wG(ˉy,σ) is uncountable. Let
By Lemmas 2.12 and 2.13, we have that
Hence there exists ˉs∈wG(ˉx,σ) such that π0(ˉs)=s0. If ˉs∈wG(ˉy,σ) then there exists positive integer sequence {ni}∞i=0 and ˉgi=(gi,gi,gi⋅⋅⋅)∈ˉG such that
Thus limi→∞gifni(y0)=s0. So s0∈wG(y0,f) which is absurd. Hence ˉs∉wG(ˉy,σ). Thus, we have that
That is,
Then we can get that
According to that the set wG(x,f)−wG(y,f) is uncountable, we can get that the set
is uncountable. Hence the set wG(ˉx,σ)−wG(ˉy,σ) is uncountable.
Secondly, we will show that wG(ˉx,σ)∩wG(ˉy,σ) is not empty. By Lemma 2.12, we have that
Since wG(x0,f)∩wG(x0,f) is a nonempty closed invariant subset and X is compact metric space, there exists a minimal set M in wG(x0,f)∩wG(x0,f). Hence, we can get that
So, we have that
Finally, we will show wG(ˉx,σ)⊄PG(σ). Suppose wG(ˉx,σ)⊂PG(σ). By Lemmas 2.12 and 2.14, we have that
Hence, we can get that
So, we have that
That is
Thus, the assumption is absurd. So wG(ˉx,σ)⊄PG(σ). Hence the set D′ is an uncountable (G,w)− scrambled set in Xf. So, the shift map σ is (G,w)− chaotic. Thus, we complete the proof.
3.
G-Lipschitz shadowing property under topological G-conjugate
Definition 3.1. [16] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The map f is said to be a Lipschitz map if there exists a positive constant L such that for all x,y∈X implies
Definition 3.2. [17] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The map f has G− Lipschitz shadowing property if there exists positive constant L and δ0 such that for any 0<δ<δ0 and (G,δ)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of f there exists a point x∈X such that the sequence {xi}∞i=0 is (G,Lδ)− shadowed by the point x.
Definition 3.3. [18] Let (X,d) and (Y,d) be a metric G− space, f be a continuous map from X to X and g be a continuous map from Y to Y. We say that f is topological G− conjugate to g about h:X→Y if h∘f=g∘h and h is an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to Y.
Theorem 3.4. Let (X,d) be metric G− space, (Y,d) be metric G− space and f be topologically G− conjugate to g about the map h:X→Y. If h is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L1 from X to Y and h−1 is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L2 from Y to X, then the map f has G− Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G− Lipschitz shadowing property.
Proof. Suppose that the map f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property. Then there exists positive constant L0>0 and ε0>0 such that for any 0<δ<ε0 and (G,δ)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of f there exists a point x∈X such that the sequence {xi}i⩾0 is (G,L0δ)− shadowed by the point x. Let
For any 0<η<ε1, let {yi}+∞i=0 be (G,η)− pseudo orbit of g. Then for any i⩾0 there exists ti∈G satisfying
According to that h−1 is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L2, we can get that
According to that h is an equivalent map and h∘f=g∘h, for any i⩾0 we have that
Thus h−1(yi) is (G,L2η)− pseudo orbit of f. According to that f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists x∈X such that for any nonnegative integer i⩾0 there exists pi∈G satisfying
Since h is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L1, we can obtain that
According to that h is an equivalent map and h∘f=g∘h, for any i⩾0 we have that
Hence the map g has G− Lipschitz shadowing property.
The method is the same as above and the proof is omitted here. Thus, we complete the proof.
4.
G-Lipschitz shadowing property of iterative map
Definition 4.1. [23] Let (X,d) be a metric G− space. The metric d is said to be invariant to the topological group G provided that d(x,y)=d(gx,gy) for all x,y∈X and g∈G.
Definition 4.2. [24] Let G be topological group. G is said to be commutative provided that p⋅g=g⋅p for all p,g∈G.
Theorem 4.3. Let (X,d) be a compact metric G− space, f:X→X be an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L and the metric d be invariant to the topological group G where G is commutative. Then the map f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if for any positive integer k⩾2 the iterative map fk has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property.
Proof. Suppose that the map f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property. Then there exists positive constant L0>0 and ε0>0 such that for any 0<ε<ε0 and (G,ε)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of f there exists a point x∈X such that the sequence {xi}i⩾0 is (G,L0ε)− shadowed by the point x. Let {yi}+∞i=0 be (G,ε)− pseudo orbit of fk and xki+j=fj(yi) where i⩾0 and 0⩽j⩽k−1. Thus {xi}∞i=0 is (G,ε)− pseudo orbit of f. According to that f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists x∈X such that for any nonnegative integer i⩾0 there exists gi∈G satisfying
Hence for any i⩾0 we have that
That is,
So, the iterative map fk has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property.
Suppose that the iterative map fk has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property. Then there exists L1>0 and ε1>0 such that for any 0<δ<ε1 and any (G,δ)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of fk there exists a point z∈X such that the sequence {xi}i⩾0 is (G,L1δ)− shadowed by the point z.
Case1. When L⩾1. Write
For any 0<η<ε1L2, let {xi}∞i=0 be (G,η)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of f.Then for any i⩾0 there exists ti∈G satisfying
Hence for any i⩾0 we have that
According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that
Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that
Let yi=xki,i⩾0. Thus, for any i⩾0 we have that
Hence {yi}∞i=0 is (G,L2η)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of fk. According to that fk has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists z∈X such that for any nonnegative integer i⩾0 there exists pi∈G satisfying
That is, for any i⩾0, we have that
By Eq (1) for any 0⩽j⩽k−1 and i⩾0 we can get that
According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that
Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that
By Eq (2) and according to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L and d is invariant to the topological group, we can obtain that
Hence, we have that
That is,
By Eqs (2) and (3) for any i⩾0 there exists si∈G satisfying
So, when L⩾1, the map f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property.
Case2. When 0<L<1. For any 0<η<ε1k, let {xi}∞i=0 be (G,η)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of f. Then for any i⩾0 there exists ti∈G satisfying
Hence, for any i⩾0 we have that
According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that
Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that
Write yi=xki where i⩾0. We have that
Hence {yi}∞i=0 is (G,kη)− pseudo orbit {xi}i⩾0 of fk. According to that fk has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists z∈X such that for any nonnegative integer i⩾0 there exists pi∈G satisfying
That is, for any i⩾0, we have that
By Eq (4), for any 0⩽j⩽k−1 and i⩾0 we can get that
According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that
Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that
By Eq (5) and according to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L and d is invariant to the topological group, we can obtain that
Thus, we have that
That is,
By Eqs (5) and (6) for any i⩾0 there exists si∈G satisfying
Hence, when 0<L<1, the map f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property. Thus, we complete the proof.
5.
Conclusions
Firstly, we study the dynamical properties of (G,w)− Chaos in the inverse limit space under group action in the paper. We obtained that the self-map f is (G,w)− chaotic, the shift map σ is (G,w)− chaotic. The conclusion generalizes the corresponding results of w− Chaos given in Li [1]. Secondly, the dynamical properties of G− Lipschitz shadowing property are studied under topological G− conjugate and iterative systems. The following conclusions are obtained. (1) If f is topologically G− conjugate to g, then the map f has G− Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G− Lipschitz shadowing property. (2) For any positive integer k⩾2, the map f has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the iterative map fk has the G− Lipschitz shadowing property. These results enrich the theory of topological G− conjugate and iterative system. It provided the theoretical basis and scientific foundation for the application of various shadowing property in computational mathematics and biological mathematics.
Acknowledgments
Research was partially supported by the NSF of Guangxi Province (2020JJA110021) and construction project of Wuzhou University of China (2020B007).
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.