Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

The research of (G,w)-Chaos and G-Lipschitz shadowing property

  • In this paper, we introduce the concepts of (G,w) Chaos and G Lipschitz shadowing property. We study the dynamical properties of (G,w) Chaos in the inverse limit space under group action. In addition, we study the dynamical properties of G Lipschitz shadowing property respectively under topological G conjugate and iterative systems. The following conclusions are obtained. (1) Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action. If the self-map f is (G,w) chaotic, the shift map σ is (G,w) chaotic; (2) Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be topologically G conjugate to g. Then the map f has G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G Lipschitz shadowing property. (3) Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be an equivariant Lipschitz map from X to X. Then for any positive integer k2, the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the iterative map fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. These results enrich the theory of topological G conjugate, iterative system and the inverse limit space under group action.

    Citation: Zhanjiang Ji. The research of (G,w)-Chaos and G-Lipschitz shadowing property[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10180-10194. doi: 10.3934/math.2022566

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhsin Incesu . LS (3)-equivalence conditions of control points and application to spatial Bézier curves and surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1216-1246. doi: 10.3934/math.2020084
    [2] Syed Ahtsham Ul Haq Bokhary, Zill-e-Shams, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . On the metric basis in wheels with consecutive missing spokes. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6221-6232. doi: 10.3934/math.2020400
    [3] Yi Hu, Zijiang Zhu, Pu Wu, Zehui Shao, Asfand Fahad . On investigations of graphs preserving the Wiener index upon vertex removal. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 12976-12985. doi: 10.3934/math.2021750
    [4] Mourad Berraho . On a problem concerning the ring of Nash germs and the Borel mapping. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 923-929. doi: 10.3934/math.2020063
    [5] Abel Cabrera-Martínez, Andrea Conchado Peiró . On the {2}-domination number of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10731-10743. doi: 10.3934/math.2022599
    [6] Yuni Listiana, Liliek Susilowati, Slamin Slamin, Fadekemi Janet Osaye . A central local metric dimension on acyclic and grid graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21298-21311. doi: 10.3934/math.20231085
    [7] Yang Zhang, Jizhu Nan . A note on the degree bounds of the invariant ring. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 10869-10881. doi: 10.3934/math.2024530
    [8] Rashid Farooq, Laiba Mudusar . Non-self-centrality number of some molecular graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8342-8351. doi: 10.3934/math.2021483
    [9] Meiqin Jin, Ping Chen, Shuangliang Tian . Interval edge colorings of the generalized lexicographic product of some graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30597-30611. doi: 10.3934/math.20241477
    [10] Supachoke Isariyapalakul, Witsarut Pho-on, Varanoot Khemmani . The true twin classes-based investigation for connected local dimensions of connected graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9435-9446. doi: 10.3934/math.2024460
  • In this paper, we introduce the concepts of (G,w) Chaos and G Lipschitz shadowing property. We study the dynamical properties of (G,w) Chaos in the inverse limit space under group action. In addition, we study the dynamical properties of G Lipschitz shadowing property respectively under topological G conjugate and iterative systems. The following conclusions are obtained. (1) Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action. If the self-map f is (G,w) chaotic, the shift map σ is (G,w) chaotic; (2) Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be topologically G conjugate to g. Then the map f has G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G Lipschitz shadowing property. (3) Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be an equivariant Lipschitz map from X to X. Then for any positive integer k2, the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the iterative map fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. These results enrich the theory of topological G conjugate, iterative system and the inverse limit space under group action.



    Chaos and shadowing property are important concepts in dynamical systems. Many scholars have studied their dynamical properties. See [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] for relevant results. For example, Li [1] proved that if the self-map f is w chaotic, then the shift map σ is w chaotic; Shah, Das and Das [2] proved that if a uniformly continuous self-map of a uniform locally compact Hausdorff space has topological weak specification property, then it admits a topologically distributionally scrambled set of type 3; Kostic [3] introduced two different notions of disjoint distributional chaos for sequences of continuous linear operators in Frechet spaces; Wang and Liu [4] generalized the notion of the ergodic shadowing property to the iterated function systems and proved some related theorems; Wang and Zeng [5] studied the relationship between average shadowing property and q_ average shadowing property; for any k0 and fH(X), Li [6] proposed that f is chaotic if and only if fk is chaotic; Li [7] proved that a chaotic semi-flow θ on a manifold M in the sense of Devaney with some assumptions is an expanding semi-flow; Li and Zhou [8] presented that if a continuous Lyapunov stable map f from a compact metric space X into itself is topologically transitive and has the asymptotic average shadowing property, then X is consisting of one point; Li [9] proved that if the set of all periodic points of ϕ×θ is dense in X×Y, then ϕ×θ is chaotic.

    According to the concept of w Chaos [1], we introduced the definition of (G,w) Chaos. Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that S is an (G,w) scrambled set if for any x,yS with xy, the following three conditions are satisfied: (1)wG(x,f)wG(y,f) is uncountable; (2) wG(x,f)wG(y,f) is nonempty; (3)wG(x,f)PG(f). The map f is said to be (G,w) chaotic if there exists an uncountable (G,w) scrambled set. Then we proved that if the self-map is (G,w) chaotic, the shift map σ is (G,w) chaotic in the inverse limit space under action group which generalizes the conclusion of w Chaos given by Li [1].

    Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The map f has G Lipschitz shadowing property if there exists positive constant L>0 and δ0>0 such that for any 0<δ<δ0 and (G,δ) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of f there exists a point xX such that the sequence {xi}i=0 is (G,Lδ) shadowed by the point x [17]. Finally, the dynamical properties of G Lipschitz shadowing property are studied under topological G conjugate and iterative systems. We derive that (1) If f is topologically G conjugate to g, then the map f has G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G Lipschitz shadowing property. (2) For any positive integer k2, the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the iterative map fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. These results enrich the theory of topological G conjugate and iterative system.

    Next, I will give the proof of above three conclusions in sections 2–4.

    Definition 2.1. [18] Let (X,d) be a metric G space, G be a topological group and φ be a continuous map from G×X to X. The (X,G,φ)orX is called to be a metric G space if the following conditions are satisfied:

    (1) φ(e,x)=x for all xX where e is the identity of G;

    (2) φ(g1,φ(g2,x))=φ(g1g2,x) where for all xX and all g1, g2G.

    If X is compact, then X is also said to be a compact metric G space. For the convenience, φ(g,x) is usually abbreviated as gx.

    Definition 2.2. [19] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that Xf is the inverse limit spaces of X if we write

    Xf={(x0,x1,x2):f(xi+1)=xi,i0},

    Where let lim(X,f) denoted by the inverse limit spaces Xf.

    The metric ˉd in Xf is defined by

    ˉd(ˉx,ˉy)=i=0d(xi,yi)2i,

    where ˉx=(x0,x1,x2)Xf and ˉy=(y0,y1,y2)Xf.

    The shift map σ:XfXf is defined by

    σ(ˉx)=(f(x0),x0,x1).

    For every i0 the projection map πi:XfX is defined by

    πi(ˉx)=xi.

    Thus (Xf,ˉd) is compact metric space and the shift map σ is homeomorphism.

    Definition 2.3. [19] Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be equivariant map from X to X. Write

    ¯G={(g,g,g):gG}andG=i=0Gi,

    where Gi=G,i0.

    The map φ:ˉG×XfXf is defined by

    φ(ˉg,ˉx)=ˉgˉx=(gx0,gx1,gx2),

    where ˉg=(g,g,g)¯G and ˉx=(x0,x1,x2)Xf.

    Then (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) is a metric G space.

    Let (X,G,d,f) and (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) are shown as above. The space (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) is called to be the inverse limit spaces of (X,G,d,f) under group action.

    Definition 2.4. [20] Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be a continuous map from X to X.We say that the map f is an equivariant map if we have f(px)=pf(x) for all xX and all pG.

    Definition 2.5. [21] Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The point x is called to be an G periodic point if there exists positive integer m and gG such that gfm(x)=x. Denoted by PG(f) the G periodic point set of f.

    Definition 2.6. [4] Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The point y is said to be an G limit point of the point x if there exists {ni}N+ and {gi}G such that limigifni(x)=y. Denoted by wG(x,f) the G limit point set of the point x.

    Definition 2.7. [21] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. If f(A)A then we say that the set A is invariant to the map f.

    Definition 2.8. [1] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that S is an w scrambled set if for any x,yS with xy the following three conditions are satisfied:

    (1) w(x,f)w(y,f) is uncountable;

    (2) w(x,f)w(y,f) is not empty;

    (3) w(x,f)P(f).

    We say that the map f is w chaotic if there exists an uncountable w scrambled set.

    Remark 2.9. According to the definition of w Chaos in metric space, we give the concept of (G,w) Chaos in metric G space.

    Definition 2.1. [1] Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be a continuous map from X to X. We say that S is an (G,w) scrambled set if for any x,yS with xy the following three conditions are satisfied:

    (1) wG(x,f)wG(y,f) is uncountable;

    (2) wG(x,f)wG(y,f) is not empty;

    (3) wG(x,f)PG(f).

    We say that the map f is (G,w) chaotic if there exists an uncountable (G,w) scrambled set.

    Definition 2.11. [22] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The set A is said to be a minimal set if for any xA we have ¯orb(x,f)=A.

    Lemma 2.12. [21] Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action, f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X and ˉx=(x0,x1,x2)Xf. Then we have

    wG(ˉx,σ)=lim(wG(x0,f),f).

    Lemma 2.13. [21] Let (X,d) be a metric G space, f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X and xX. Then we have that wG(x,f) is closed and

    f(wG(x,f))=wG(x,f).

    Lemma 2.14. [21] Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action and f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X. Then we have

    PG(σ)=lim(PG(f),f).

    Theorem 2.15. Let (Xf,ˉG, ˉd,σ) be the inverse limit space of (X,G,d,f) under group action and f be an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to X. If the self-map f is (G,w) chaotic, then the shift map σ is (G,w) chaotic.

    Proof. Suppose that the self-map f is (G,w) chaotic. Then there exists an uncountable (G,w) scrambled set S. Write

    D={ˉx:ˉxπ10(x),xS}.

    Thus D is an uncountable set in Xf. Next, we will show that D is an (G,w) scrambled set in Xf. Let

    ˉx=(x0,x1,x2)Dandˉy=(y0,y1,y2)Dwithˉxˉy.

    According to that f is an homeomorphism map, the point x0 and y0 are two different points in S. By the definition of (G,w) scrambled set S, we have the following three conditions:

    (1) wG(x0,f)wG(y0,f) is uncountable;

    (2) wG(x0,f)wG(y0,f) is not empty;

    (3) wG(x0,f)PG(f).

    Firstly, we will show that wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ) is uncountable. Let

    s0wG(x0,f)wG(y0,f).

    By Lemmas 2.12 and 2.13, we have that

    wG(ˉx,σ)=lim(wG(x0,f),f).
    f(wG(x,f))=wG(x,f).

    Hence there exists ˉswG(ˉx,σ) such that π0(ˉs)=s0. If ˉswG(ˉy,σ) then there exists positive integer sequence {ni}i=0 and ˉgi=(gi,gi,gi)ˉG such that

    limiˉgiσni(ˉy)=ˉs.

    Thus limigifni(y0)=s0. So s0wG(y0,f) which is absurd. Hence ˉswG(ˉy,σ). Thus, we have that

    ˉswG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ).

    That is,

    s0=π0(ˉs)π0(wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ))

    Then we can get that

    wG(x0,f)wG(y0,f)π0(wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ)).

    According to that the set wG(x,f)wG(y,f) is uncountable, we can get that the set

    π0(wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ))

    is uncountable. Hence the set wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ) is uncountable.

    Secondly, we will show that wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ) is not empty. By Lemma 2.12, we have that

    wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ)=lim(wG(x0,f),f)lim(wG(x0,f),f)
    =lim(wG(x0,f)wG(x0,f),f).

    Since wG(x0,f)wG(x0,f) is a nonempty closed invariant subset and X is compact metric space, there exists a minimal set M in wG(x0,f)wG(x0,f). Hence, we can get that

    lim(M,f)lim(wG(x0,f)wG(x0,f),f).

    So, we have that

    wG(ˉx,σ)wG(ˉy,σ).

    Finally, we will show wG(ˉx,σ)PG(σ). Suppose wG(ˉx,σ)PG(σ). By Lemmas 2.12 and 2.14, we have that

    wG(ˉx,σ)=lim(wG(x0,f),f).
    PG(σ)=lim(PG(f),f).

    Hence, we can get that

    lim(wG(x0,f),f)lim(PG(f),f).

    So, we have that

    π0(lim(wG(x0,f),f))π0(lim(PG(f),f)).

    That is

    wG(x0,f)PG(f).

    Thus, the assumption is absurd. So wG(ˉx,σ)PG(σ). Hence the set D is an uncountable (G,w) scrambled set in Xf. So, the shift map σ is (G,w) chaotic. Thus, we complete the proof.

    Definition 3.1. [16] Let (X,d) be a metric space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The map f is said to be a Lipschitz map if there exists a positive constant L such that for all x,yX implies

    d(f(x),f(y))Ld(x,y).

    Definition 3.2. [17] Let (X,d) be a metric G space and f be a continuous map from X to X. The map f has G Lipschitz shadowing property if there exists positive constant L and δ0 such that for any 0<δ<δ0 and (G,δ) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of f there exists a point xX such that the sequence {xi}i=0 is (G,Lδ) shadowed by the point x.

    Definition 3.3. [18] Let (X,d) and (Y,d) be a metric G space, f be a continuous map from X to X and g be a continuous map from Y to Y. We say that f is topological G conjugate to g about h:XY if hf=gh and h is an equivariant homeomorphism map from X to Y.

    Theorem 3.4. Let (X,d) be metric G space, (Y,d) be metric G space and f be topologically G conjugate to g about the map h:XY. If h is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L1 from X to Y and h1 is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L2 from Y to X, then the map f has G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G Lipschitz shadowing property.

    Proof. Suppose that the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. Then there exists positive constant L0>0 and ε0>0 such that for any 0<δ<ε0 and (G,δ) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of f there exists a point xX such that the sequence {xi}i0 is (G,L0δ) shadowed by the point x. Let

    L3=L0L1L2andε1=ε0L2.

    For any 0<η<ε1, let {yi}+i=0 be (G,η) pseudo orbit of g. Then for any i0 there exists tiG satisfying

    d(tig(yi),yi+1)<η.

    According to that h1 is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L2, we can get that

    d(h1(tig(yi)),h1(yi+1))L2d(tig(yi),yi+1)<L2η.

    According to that h is an equivalent map and hf=gh, for any i0 we have that

    d(tif(h1(yi)),h1(yi+1))<L2η<ε0.

    Thus h1(yi) is (G,L2η) pseudo orbit of f. According to that f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists xX such that for any nonnegative integer i0 there exists piG satisfying

    d(fi(x),pih1(yi))<L0L2η.

    Since h is a Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L1, we can obtain that

    d(h(fi(x)),h(pih1(yi)))L1d(fi(x),pih1(yi))<L0L1L2η.

    According to that h is an equivalent map and hf=gh, for any i0 we have that

    d(gi(h(z),piyi)<L0L1L2η=L3η.

    Hence the map g has G Lipschitz shadowing property.

    The method is the same as above and the proof is omitted here. Thus, we complete the proof.

    Definition 4.1. [23] Let (X,d) be a metric G space. The metric d is said to be invariant to the topological group G provided that d(x,y)=d(gx,gy) for all x,yX and gG.

    Definition 4.2. [24] Let G be topological group. G is said to be commutative provided that pg=gp for all p,gG.

    Theorem 4.3. Let (X,d) be a compact metric G space, f:XX be an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L and the metric d be invariant to the topological group G where G is commutative. Then the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if for any positive integer k2 the iterative map fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property.

    Proof. Suppose that the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. Then there exists positive constant L0>0 and ε0>0 such that for any 0<ε<ε0 and (G,ε) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of f there exists a point xX such that the sequence {xi}i0 is (G,L0ε) shadowed by the point x. Let {yi}+i=0 be (G,ε) pseudo orbit of fk and xki+j=fj(yi) where i0 and 0jk1. Thus {xi}i=0 is (G,ε) pseudo orbit of f. According to that f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists xX such that for any nonnegative integer i0 there exists giG satisfying

    d(fi(x),gixi)<L0ε.

    Hence for any i0 we have that

    d(fki(x),gkixki)<L0ε.

    That is,

    d((fk)i(x),gkiyi)<L0ε.

    So, the iterative map fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property.

    Suppose that the iterative map fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. Then there exists L1>0 and ε1>0 such that for any 0<δ<ε1 and any (G,δ) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of fk there exists a point zX such that the sequence {xi}i0 is (G,L1δ) shadowed by the point z.

    Case1. When L1. Write

    L2=Lk1+Lk2++L+1.

    For any 0<η<ε1L2, let {xi}i=0 be (G,η) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of f.Then for any i0 there exists tiG satisfying

    d(tif(xi),xi+1)<η. (1)

    Hence for any i0 we have that

    d(tkif(xki),xki+1)<η.
    d(tki+1f(xki+1),xki+2)<η.
    d(tki+2f(xki+2),xki+3)<η.
    d(tki+k2f(xki+k2),xki+k1)<η.
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<η.

    According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that

    d(tkifk(xki),fk1(xki+1))<Lk1η.
    d(tki+1fk1(xki+1),fk2(xki+2))<Lk2η.
    d(tki+2fk2(xki+2),fk3(xki+3))<Lk3η.
    d(tki+k2f2(xki+k2),f(xki+k1))<Lη.
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<η.

    Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+k1fk(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1))<Lk1η.
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1),tki+2tki+k1fk2(xki+2))<Lk2η.
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+k1fk2(xki+2),tki+3tki+k1fk3(xki+3))<Lk3η.
    d(tki+k2tki+k1f2(xki+k2),tki+k1f(xki+k1))<Lη.
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<η.

    Let yi=xki,i0. Thus, for any i0 we have that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+k1fk(yi),yi+1)=d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+k1fk(xki),xki+k)<
    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+k1fk(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1))+
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1),tki+2tki+k1fk2(xki+2))+
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+k1fk2(xki+2),tki+3tki+k1fk3(xki+3))+
    d(tki+i2tki+k1f2(xki+k2),tki+k1f(xki+k1))+
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<
    Lk1η+Lk2η+Lk3η+Lk4η++Lη+η=
    (Lk1+Lk2++L+1)η=L2η<ε1.

    Hence {yi}i=0 is (G,L2η) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of fk. According to that fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists zX such that for any nonnegative integer i0 there exists piG satisfying

    d((fk)i(z),piyi)<L1L2η.

    That is, for any i0, we have that

    d(fki(z),pixki)<L1L2η. (2)

    By Eq (1) for any 0jk1 and i0 we can get that

    d(tkif(xki),xki+1)<η.
    d(tki+1f(xki+1),xki+2)<η.
    d(tki+2f(xki+2),xki+3)<η.
    d(tki+j2f(xki+j2),xki+j1)<η.
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<η.

    According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that

    d(tkifj(xki),fj1(xki+1))<Lj1η.
    d(tki+1fj1(xki+1),fj2(xki+2))<Lj2η.
    d(tki+2fj2(xki+2),fj3(xki+3))<Lj3η.
    d(tki+j2f2(xki+j2),xki+j1)<Lη.
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<η.

    Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1))<Lj1η.
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1),tki+2tki+j1fj2(xki+2))<Lj2η.
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+j1fj2(xki+2),tki+3tki+j1fj3(xki+3))<Lj3η.
    d(tki+j2tki+j1f2(xki+j2),tki+j1f(xki+j1))<Lη.
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<η.

    By Eq (2) and according to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L and d is invariant to the topological group, we can obtain that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1p1ifki+j(z),tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki))<LjL1L2η.

    Hence, we have that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1p1ifki+j(z),xki+j)<
    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1p1ifki+j(z),tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki))+
    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1))+
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1),tki+2tki+j1fj2(xki+2))+
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+j1fj2(xki+2),tki+3tki+j1fj3(xki+3))+
    d(tki+j2tki+j1f2(xki+j2),tki+i1f(xki+j1))+
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<
    LjL1L2η+Lj1η+Lj2η+Lj3η++Lη+η<
    (LkL1L2+KLK)η<(L1L2+K)LKη.

    That is,

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+i1p1ifki+j(z),xki+j)<(L1L2+K)LKη. (3)

    By Eqs (2) and (3) for any i0 there exists siG satisfying

    d(fi(z),sixi)<(L1L2+K)LKη.

    So, when L1, the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property.

    Case2. When 0<L<1. For any 0<η<ε1k, let {xi}i=0 be (G,η) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of f. Then for any i0 there exists tiG satisfying

    d(tif(xi),xi+1)<η. (4)

    Hence, for any i0 we have that

    d(tkif(xki),xki+1)<η.
    d(tki+1f(xki+1),xki+2)<η.
    d(tki+2f(xki+2),xki+3)<η.
    d(tki+k2f(xki+2),xki+k1)<η.
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<η.

    According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that

    d(tkifk(xki),fk1(xki+1))<Lk1η.
    d(tki+1fk1(xki+1),fk2(xki+2))<Lk2η.
    d(tki+2fk2(xki+2),fk3(xki+3))<Lk3η.
    d(tki+k2f2(xki+k2),tki+k1f(xki+k1))<Lη.
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<η.

    Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+k1fk(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1))<Lk1η.
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1),tki+2tki+k1fk2(xki+2))<Lk2η.
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+k1fk2(xki+2),tki+3tki+k1fk3(xki+3))<Lk3η.
    d(tki+k2tki+k1f2(xki+k2),tki+k1f(xki+k1))<Lη.
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<η.

    Write yi=xki where i0. We have that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+i1fk(yi),yi+1)=d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+k1fk(xki),xki+k)<
    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+k1fk(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1))+
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+k1fk1(xki+1),tki+2tki+k1fk2(xki+2))+
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+k1fk2(xki+2),tki+3tki+k1fk3(xki+3))+
    d(tki+k2tki+k1f2(xki+2),tki+k1f(xki+k1))+
    d(tki+k1f(xki+k1),xki+k)<
    Lk1η+Lk2η+Lk3η+Lk4η++Lη+η<kη.

    Hence {yi}i=0 is (G,kη) pseudo orbit {xi}i0 of fk. According to that fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property, there exists zX such that for any nonnegative integer i0 there exists piG satisfying

    d((fk)i(z),piyi)<L1kη.

    That is, for any i0, we have that

    d(fki(z),pixki)<L1kη. (5)

    By Eq (4), for any 0jk1 and i0 we can get that

    d(tkif(xki),xki+1)<η.
    d(tki+1f(xki+1),xki+2)<η.
    d(tki+2f(xki+2),xki+3)<η.
    d(tki+j2f(xki+j2),xki+j1)<η.
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<η.

    According to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L, we can get that

    d(tkifj(xki),fj1(xki+1))<Lj1η.
    d(tki+1fj1(xki+1),fj2(xki+2))<Lj2η.
    d(tki+2fj2(xki+2),fj3(xki+3))<Lj3η.
    d(tki+j2f2(xki+j2),tki+j1f(xki+j1))<Lη.
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<η.

    Since d is invariant to the topological group G and G is commutative, we can obtain that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1))<Lj1η.
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1),tki+2tki+j1fj2(xki+2))<Lj2η.
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+j1fj2(xki+2),tki+3tki+j1fj3(xki+3))<Lj3η.
    d(tki+j2tki+j1f2(xki+j2),tki+j1f(xki+j1))<Lη.
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<η.

    By Eq (5) and according to that f is an equivalent Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant L and d is invariant to the topological group, we can obtain that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1p1ifki+j(z),tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki))<LjL1kη.

    Thus, we have that

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1p1ifki+j(z),xki+j)<
    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1p1ifki+j(z),tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki))+
    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+j1fj(xki),tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1))+
    d(tki+1tki+2tki+j1fj1(xki+1),tki+2tki+j1fj2(xki+2))+
    d(tki+2tki+3tki+j1fj2(xki+2),tki+3tki+j1fj3(xki+3))+
    d(tki+j2tki+j1f2(xki+j2),tki+j1f(xki+j1))+
    d(tki+j1f(xki+j1),xki+j)<
    LjL1kη+Lj1η+Lj2η+Lj3η++Lη+η<L1kη+kη=k(L1+1)η.

    That is,

    d(tkitki+1tki+2tki+i1p1ifki+j(z),xki+j)<k(L1+1)η. (6)

    By Eqs (5) and (6) for any i0 there exists siG satisfying

    d(fi(z),sixi)<k(L1+1)η.

    Hence, when 0<L<1, the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. Thus, we complete the proof.

    Firstly, we study the dynamical properties of (G,w) Chaos in the inverse limit space under group action in the paper. We obtained that the self-map f is (G,w) chaotic, the shift map σ is (G,w) chaotic. The conclusion generalizes the corresponding results of w Chaos given in Li [1]. Secondly, the dynamical properties of G Lipschitz shadowing property are studied under topological G conjugate and iterative systems. The following conclusions are obtained. (1) If f is topologically G conjugate to g, then the map f has G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the map g has G Lipschitz shadowing property. (2) For any positive integer k2, the map f has the G Lipschitz shadowing property if and only if the iterative map fk has the G Lipschitz shadowing property. These results enrich the theory of topological G conjugate and iterative system. It provided the theoretical basis and scientific foundation for the application of various shadowing property in computational mathematics and biological mathematics.

    Research was partially supported by the NSF of Guangxi Province (2020JJA110021) and construction project of Wuzhou University of China (2020B007).

    The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.



    [1] S. H. Li, Dynamical properties of the shift maps on the inverse limit spaces, Ergod. Theor. Dyn. Syst., 12 (1992), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385700006611 doi: 10.1017/S0143385700006611
    [2] S. Shah, T. Das, R. Das, Distributional chaos on uniform spaces, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 19 (2020), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00344-x doi: 10.1007/s12346-020-00344-x
    [3] M. Kostic, Disjoint distributional chaos in Frechet spaces, Results Math., 75 (2020), 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-020-01210-7 doi: 10.1007/s00025-020-01210-7
    [4] H. Y. Wang, Q. Liu, Ergodic shadowing properties of iterated function systems, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 44 (2021), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-020-00976-x doi: 10.1007/s40840-020-00976-x
    [5] H. Y. Wang, P. Zeng, Partial shadowing of average-pseudo-orbits, Sci. Sin. Math., 46 (2016), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1360/N012014-00256 doi: 10.1360/N012014-00256
    [6] R. S. Li, A note on chaos and the shadowing property, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 45 (2016), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2015.1076404 doi: 10.1080/03081079.2015.1076404
    [7] R. S. Li, A note on decay of correlation implies chaos in the sense of Devaney, Appl. Math. Model., 39 (2015), 6705–6710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.019 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.019
    [8] R. S. Li, X. L. Zhou, A Note on ergodicity of systems with the asymptotic average shadowing property, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2011 (2011), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/360583 doi: 10.1155/2011/360583
    [9] R. S. Li, X. L. Zhou, A note on chaos in product maps, Turk. J. Math., 37 (2013), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1101-71 doi: 10.3906/mat-1101-71
    [10] S. H. Li, w− chaos and topological entropy, T. Am. Math. Soc., 339 (1993), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.2307/2154217 doi: 10.2307/2154217
    [11] H. Shao, G. R. Chen, Y. M. Shi, Some criteria of chaos in non-autonomous discrete dynamical systems, J. Differ. Equ. Appl., 26 (2020), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2020.1725496 doi: 10.1080/10236198.2020.1725496
    [12] G. F. Liao, L. D. Wang, X. D. Duan, A chaotic function with a distributively scrambled set of full Lebesgue measure, Nonlinear Anal.-Theor., 66 (2007), 2274–2280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2006.03.018 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2006.03.018
    [13] E. D'Aniello, U. B. Darji, M. Maiuriello, Generalized hyperbolicity and shadowing in Lp spaces, J. Differ. Equ., 298 (2021), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.06.038 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2021.06.038
    [14] L. Wang, J. L. Zhang, Lipschitz shadowing property for 1-dimensional subsystems of Zk-actions, J. Math. Res. Appl., 41 (2021), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.3770/j.issn:2095-2651.2021.06.006 doi: 10.3770/j.issn:2095-2651.2021.06.006
    [15] P. A. Guihéneuf, T. Lefeuvre, On the genericity of the shadowing property for conservative homeomorphisms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 146 (2018), 4225–4237. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13526 doi: 10.1090/proc/13526
    [16] K. Sakai, Various shadowing properties for positively expansive maps, Topol. Appl., 131 (2003), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-8641(02)00260-2 doi: 10.1016/s0166-8641(02)00260-2
    [17] Z. J. Ji, G. R. Zhang, J. X. Tu, Asymptotic average and Lipschitz shadowing property of the product map under group action, J. Hebei Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 43 (2019), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.nse.2019.06.004. doi: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.nse.2019.06.004
    [18] S. A. Ahmadi, Invariants of topological G-conjugacy on G-Spaces, Math. Morav., 18-1 (2014), 67–75.
    [19] Z. J. Ji, Dynamical property of product space and the inverse limit space of a topological group action, Master' thesis, Guangxi University, 2014.
    [20] S. Ekta, D. Tas, Consequences of shadowing property of G-spaces, Int. J. Math. Anal., 7 (2013), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2013.13056 doi: 10.12988/ijma.2013.13056
    [21] Z. J. Ji, G. J. Qin, G. R. Zhang, Dynamical properties of the shift map in the inverse limit space of a topological group action, J. Anhui Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 44 (2020), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2162.2020.05.005 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2162.2020.05.005
    [22] L. S. Block, W. A. Coppel, Dynamics in one dimension, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0084762
    [23] T. Choi, J. Kim, Decomposition theorem on G-spaces, Osaka J. Math., 46 (2009), 87–104.
    [24] Z. Balogh, V. Laver, Unitary subgroups of commutative group algebras of the characteristic two, Ukr. Math. J., 72 (2020), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-020-01829-3 doi: 10.1007/s11253-020-01829-3
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zhanjiang Ji, Dynamical property of hyperspace on uniform space, 2023, 56, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2023-0264
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1624) PDF downloads(59) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog