Research article

The image of polynomials in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras

  • Received: 26 December 2021 Revised: 19 February 2022 Accepted: 27 February 2022 Published: 18 March 2022
  • MSC : 16S50, 16R10, 15A54

  • In the present paper, we give a description of the image of polynomials in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field. As consequences, we give concrete descriptions of the images of polynomials of degrees up to 4 in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field.

    Citation: Lan Lu, Yu Wang, Huihui Wang, Haoliang Zhao. The image of polynomials in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 9884-9893. doi: 10.3934/math.2022551

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xinfeng Liang, Mengya Zhang . Triangular algebras with nonlinear higher Lie n-derivation by local actions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2549-2583. doi: 10.3934/math.2024126
    [2] Zehra Velioǧlu, Mukaddes Balçik . On the Tame automorphisms of differential polynomial algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3547-3555. doi: 10.3934/math.2020230
    [3] Yingyu Luo, Yu Wang . Supercommuting maps on unital algebras with idempotents. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24636-24653. doi: 10.3934/math.20241200
    [4] Hailun Wang, Fei Wu, Dongge Lei . A novel numerical approach for solving fractional order differential equations using hybrid functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5596-5611. doi: 10.3934/math.2021331
    [5] Yingyu Luo, Yu Wang, Junjie Gu, Huihui Wang . Jordan matrix algebras defined by generators and relations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3047-3055. doi: 10.3934/math.2022168
    [6] Berna Arslan . On generalized biderivations of Banach algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36259-36272. doi: 10.3934/math.20241720
    [7] Zengtai Gong, Jun Wu, Kun Liu . The dual fuzzy matrix equations: Extended solution, algebraic solution and solution. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 7310-7328. doi: 10.3934/math.2023368
    [8] Xiuhai Fei, Zhonghua Wang, Cuixian Lu, Haifang Zhang . Higher Jordan triple derivations on $ * $-type trivial extension algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6933-6950. doi: 10.3934/math.2024338
    [9] Qingmei Bai, Alatancang Chen, Jingying Gao . Browder spectra of closed upper triangular operator matrices. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 5110-5121. doi: 10.3934/math.2024248
    [10] Gonca Kizilaslan . The altered Hermite matrix: implications and ramifications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25360-25375. doi: 10.3934/math.20241238
  • In the present paper, we give a description of the image of polynomials in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field. As consequences, we give concrete descriptions of the images of polynomials of degrees up to 4 in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field.



    Let K be a field. By Kx1,,xn we denote the free K-algebra generated by non-commuting indeterminate x1,,xn and refer to the elements of Kx1,,xn as polynomials. Without special explanation we always assume that every polynomial over K is a polynomial with zero constant term.

    Images of polynomials evaluated on algebras play an important role in non-commutative algebras. The old and famous Lvov-Kaplansky conjecture asserts: The image of a multilinear polynomial in non-commutative variables over a field K on the matrix algebra Mn(K) is a vector space (see [6] for details). The parallel topic in group theory (the images of words in groups) has been studied extensively (see [2,17]).

    In 2012, Kanel-Belov, Malev and Rowen [6] made a major breakthrough and solved the Lvov-Kaplansky conjecture for n=2. In 2016, Kanel-Belov, Malev and Rowen [7] solved the Lvov-Kaplansky conjecture for n=3. We remark that in [6,7] the authors considered multilinear elements only. Some results on the Lvov-Kaplansky conjecture have been obtained in [8,9,12].

    We remark that the images of multilinear polynomials of small degree on Lie algebras [1,13] and Jordan algebras [11] have been discussed.

    In 2019, Fagundes [3] gave a complete description of the image of multilinear polynomials on strictly upper triangular matrix algebras. In 2019, Fagundes and Mello [4] discussed the image of multilinear polynomials of degree up to four on upper triangular matrix algebras. They proposed the following variation of the Lvov-Kaplansky conjecture:

    Conjecture 1.1. The image of a multilinear polynomial over a field K on the uppertrinagular matrix algebra Tn(K) is always a vector space.

    In 2019, Wang [14] gave a positive answer of Conjecture 1 for n=2. We remark that there exists a gap in the proof of [14,Theorem 1]. In 2019, Wang, Liu and Bai [15] gave a correct proof of [14,Theorem 1]. It should be mentioned that Conjecture 1 has been answered (see [5,10]).

    In 2021, Zhou and Wang [18] gave a complete description of the image of completely homogeneous polynomials on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field. In the same year, Wang, Zhou and Luo [16] gave the Zariski topology structure of the image of polynomials on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field.

    In the present paper, we give a description of the image of polynomials in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field. As consequences, we give concrete descriptions of the images of polynomials of degrees up to 4 in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field.

    Let K be a field. Let p(x) be a polynomial in one variable over K. We now give the following definition, which is crucial for the proof of our main result.

    Definition 2.1. Let K be a field. Let p(x) be a polynomial in one variable over K. An element cK is said to be a single element of p if p(x)c has a simple root in K.

    By S(p) we denote the set of all simple elements of p.

    The following examples give complete descriptions of the set of all simple elements of polynomials of degree up to 4 in one variable. We omit the proofs of both Examples 2.1 and 2.2.

    Example 2.1. Let K be an algebraically closed field. Let

    p(x)=x2+βx,

    where βK. Then one of the following statements holds:

    (i) Suppose char(K)2. Then S(p)=K{14β2};

    (ii) Suppose char(K)=2 and β=0. Then S(p)=;

    (iii) Suppose char(K)=2 and β0. Then S(p)=K.

    Example 2.2. Let K be an algebraically closed field. Let

    p(x)=x3+β1x2+β2x,

    where β1,β2K. Then one of the following statements holds:

    (i) Suppose char(K)3 and β21=3β2. Then S(p)=K{127β31};

    (ii) Suppose char(K)3 and β213β2. Then S(p)=K;

    (iii) Suppose char(K)=3 and β1=β2=0. Then S(p)=;

    (iv) Suppose char(K)=3 and either β10 or β20. Then S(p)=K.

    Example 2.3. Let K be an algebraically closed field. Let

    p(x)=x4+β1x3+β2x2+β3x,

    where β1,β2,β3K. Then one of the following statements holds:

    (i) Suppose char(K)=2 and β1=β3=0. Then S(p)=;

    (ii) Suppose char(K)=2 and either β10 or β30. Then S(p)=K;

    (iii) Suppose char(K)2 and β1=β3=0. Then S(p)=;

    (iv) Suppose char(K)2, β1=0 and β30. Then S(p)=K;

    (v) Suppose char(K)2, β10, β2=14β21+2β3β11. Then S(p)=K{(β11β3)2};

    (vi) Suppose char(K)2, β10, β214β21+2β3β11. Then S(p)=K.

    Proof. We just give the proof of (i). The other statements can be proved analogously. For cK, we set

    f(x)=p(x)c.

    It is easy to check that f(x) has no simple roots in K if and only if

    f(x)=(xα)2(xβ)2, (2.1)

    where α,βK. Expanding (2.1) and comparing the coefficients of (2.1) we obtain

    β1=2(α+β),β2=α2+4αβ+β2,β3=2αβ(α+β),c=α2β2. (2.2)

    Suppose first that char(K)=2 and β1=β3=0. Let ω1,ω2K be a solution of the following equation:

    x2+β2xc=0.

    It follows that

    ω1+ω2=β2,ω1ω2=c.

    Let γ1K be a solution of x2=ω1. Let γ2K be a solution of x2=ω2. We have

    γ21+γ22=β2,γ21γ22=c.

    It follows that

    f(x)c=x4+β2x2c=(xγ1)2(xγ2)2.

    In view of Definition 1, we get that cS(p). Hence S(p)=. This proves (i).

    Set K=K{0}. Let T2(K) be the set of all 2×2 upper triangular matrices over K.

    We give a description of the image of polynomials in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field.

    Theorem 3.1. Let d1 be integer. Let K be an algebraically closed field.Let

    p(x)=βdxd+βd1xd1++β1x,

    where βiK for i=1,,d with βd0. We have

    p(T2(K))=T2(K){(cK0c)|cS(p)}.

    In particular, p(T2(K)) is not a vector space if S(p)K.

    Proof. For (ama)T2(K), we claim that

    p(ama)=(p(a)p(a)mp(a)), (3.1)

    where p(x) is the derivation of p(x). Indeed, we have

    p(ama)=di=1βi(ama)i=di=1βi(aiiai1mai)=(di=1βiaidi=1βiiai1mdi=1βiai)=(p(a)p(a)mp(a)).

    For (amb)T2(K), where ab, we claim that

    p(amb)=(p(a)p(a)p(b)abmp(b)). (3.2)

    Indeed, we have

    p(amb)=di=1βi(amb)i=di=1βi(aiis=1aisbs1mbi)=di=1βi(aiaibiabmbi)=(p(a)di=1βiaibiabmp(b))=(p(a)di=1βiaidi=1βibiabmp(b))=(p(a)p(a)p(b)abmp(b)).

    For any (amb)T2(K), where ab, we have that there exist a,bK such that

    p(a)=aandp(b)=b.

    Note that ab. Set

    λ=(abab)1.

    Take u=(aλmb). It follows from (3.2) that

    p(u)=(p(a)p(a)p(b)abλmp(b))=(aababλmb)=(amb). (3.3)

    This implies that

    {(aKb)|ab}p(T2(K)). (3.4)

    For any (a0a)T2(K), we have that there exists aK such that p(a)=a. Take u=(a0a)T2(K). It follows from (3.1) that

    p(u)=(a0a).

    This implies that

    KI2p(T2(K)), (3.5)

    where I2 is the identity matrix of T2(K). For cS(p), we set

    f(x)=p(x)c.

    In view of Definition 2.1, we have that f(x) has a simple root ωK. We have

    f(ω)=p(ω)c=0

    and

    f(ω)=p(ω)0,

    where f and p are the derivations of f and p, respectively. Set

    u=(ωp(ω)1mω)

    for mK. It follows from (3.1) that

    p(u)=p(ωp(ω)1mω)=(p(ω)p(ω)p(ω)1mp(ω))=(cmc).

    This implies that

    {(cKc)|cS(p)}p(T2(K)). (3.6)

    We get from (3.4)–(3.6) that

    T2(K){(cK0c)|cS(p)}p(T2(K)).

    For any u=(ama)T2(K), we get from (3.1) that

    p(u)=(p(a)p(a)mp(a)).

    Suppose first p(a)=0. We have

    p(u)KI2. (3.7)

    Suppose next p(a)0. Set

    f(x)=p(x)p(a).

    It is clear that

    f(a)=0andf(a)=p(a)0.

    This implies that aK is a simple root of f(x).

    In view of Definition 2.1, we get p(a)S(p). We have

    p(u){(cKc)|cS(p)}. (3.8)

    For any u=(amb)T2(K), where ab, we get from (3.2) that

    p(u)=(p(a)p(a)p(b)abmp(b)).

    Suppose first p(a)p(b). We have

    p(u){(aKb)|abK}. (3.9)

    Suppose next p(a)=p(b). We have that

    p(u)KI2. (3.10)

    We get from (3.3)–(3.10) that

    p(T2(K))T2(K){(cK0c)|cS(p)}.

    We obtain

    p(T2(K))=T2(K){(cK0c)|cS(p)}.

    Suppose S(p)K. We claim that p(T2(K)) is not a vector space.

    Take aKS(p). Suppose first 0S(p). Take

    (a0a),(010)p(T2(K)).

    We have

    (a0a)+(010)=(a1a)p(T2(K)).

    This implies that p(T2(K)) is not a vector space. Suppose next 0S(p). Take (110),(100)p(T2(K)). We have

    (110)+(100)=(010)p(T2(K)).

    This implies that p(T2(K)) is not a vector space. The proof of the result is complete.

    As a consequence, we give a concrete description of the image of polynomials of degree up to 4 in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field.

    Corollary 3.1. Let K be an algebraically closed field. We have

    (1) Let p(x)=x2+βx, where βK. Then one of the following statementsholds:

    (i) Suppose char(K)2. Then

    p(T2(K))=T2(K)(14β2K14β2)

    is not a vector space;

    (ii) Suppose char(K)=2 and β=0. Then

    p(T2(K))=T2(K){(cKc)|cK}

    is not a vector space;

    (iii) Suppose char(K)=2 and β0. Then p(T2(K))=T2(K).

    (2) Let p(x)=x3+β1x2+β2x, where β1,β2K. Then one of the following statementsholds:

    (i) Suppose char(K)3 and β21=3β2. Then

    p(T2(K))=T2(K)(127β31K127β31)

    is not a vector space;

    (ii) Suppose char(K)3 and β213β2. Then p(T2(K))=T2(K);

    (iii) Suppose char(K)=3 and β1=β2=0. Then

    p(T2(K))=T2(K){(cKc)|cK}

    is not a vector space;

    (iv) Suppose char(K)=3 and either β10 or β20.Then p(T2(K))=T2(K).

    (3) Let p(x)=x4+β1x3+β2x2+β3x, where β1,β2,β3K. Then one of the following statements holds:

    (i) Suppose char(K)=2 and β1=β3=0. Then

    p(T2(K))=T2(K){(cKc)|cK}

    is not a vector space

    (ii) Suppose char(K)=2 and either β10 or β30. Then p(T2(K))=T2(K);

    (iii) Suppose char(K)2 and β1=β3=0. Then

    p(T2(K))=T2(K){(cKc)|cK}

    is not a vector space;

    (iv) Suppose char(K)2, β1=0 and β30. Then p(T2(K))=T2(K);

    (v) Suppose char(K)2, β10, β2=14β21+2β3β11. Then

    p(T2(K))=T2(K)((β11β3)2K(β11β3)2)

    is not a vector space;

    (vi) Suppose char(K)2, β10, β214β21+2β3β11. Then p(T2(K))=T2(K).

    Proof. The statement (1) follows from both Example 2.1 and Theorem 3.1. The statement (2) follows from both Example 2.2 and Theorem 3.1. The statement (3) follows from both Example 2.3 and Theorem 3.1.

    In this paper, we first defined the set of all single elements of polynomials in one variable. We next gave a description of the image of polynomials in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field. As an application of our main result, we gave concrete descriptions of the images of polynomials of degrees up to 4 in one variable on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras over an algebraically closed field.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] B. E. Anzis, Z. M. Emrich, K. G. Valiveti, On the images of Lie polynomials evaluated on Lie algebras, Linear Algebra Appl., 469 (2015), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2014.11.015 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2014.11.015
    [2] A. Borel, On free subgroups of semisimple groups, Enseign. Math., 29 (1983), 151–164.
    [3] P. S. Fagundes, The images of multilinear polynomials on strictly upper triangular matrices, Linear Algebra Appl., 563 (2019), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2018.11.014 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2018.11.014
    [4] P. S. Fagundes, T. C. de Mello, Images of multilinear polynomials of degree up to four on upper triangular matrices, Oper. Matrices, 13 (2019), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.7153/oam-2019-13-18 doi: 10.7153/oam-2019-13-18
    [5] I. G. Gagate, T. C. de Mello, Images of multilinear polynomials on n×n upper triangular matrices over infinite fields, arXiv Preprint, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.12726
    [6] A. Kanel-Belov, S. Malev, L. Rowen, The images of non-commutative polynomials evaluated on 2×2 matrices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 140 (2012), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-10963-8 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-10963-8
    [7] A. Kanel-Belov, S. Malev, L. Rowen, The images of multilinear polynomials evaluated on 3×3 matrices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 144 (2016), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/12478 doi: 10.1090/proc/12478
    [8] A. Kanel-Belov, S. Malev, L. Rowen, Power-central polynomials on matrices, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 220 (2016), 2164–2176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2015.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2015.11.001
    [9] A. Kanel-Belov, S. Malev, L. Rowen, The images of Lie polynomials evaluated on matrices, Commun. Algebra, 45 (2017), 4801–4808. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2017.1282959 doi: 10.1080/00927872.2017.1282959
    [10] Y. Y. Luo, Y. Wang, On Fagundes-Mello conjecture, J. Algebra, 592 (2022), 118–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2021.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2021.11.008
    [11] A. Ma, J. Oliva, On the images of Jordan polynomials evaluated over symmetric matrices, Linear Algebra Appl., 492 (2016), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2015.11.015 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2015.11.015
    [12] S. Malev, The images of non-commutative polynomials evaluated on 2×2 matrices over an arbitrary field, J. Algebra Appl., 13 (2014), 1450004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498814500042 doi: 10.1142/S0219498814500042
    [13] Š. Špenko, On the image of a noncommutative polynomial, J. Algebra, 377 (2013), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.12.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.12.006
    [14] Y. Wang, The images of multilinear polynomials on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 67 (2019), 2366–2372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2019.1614519 doi: 10.1080/03081087.2019.1614519
    [15] Y. Wang, P. P. Liu, J. Bai, The images of multilinear polynomials on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 67 (2019), i–vi. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2019.1656706 doi: 10.1080/03081087.2019.1656706
    [16] Y. Wang, J. Zhou, Y. Y. Luo, The images of polynomials on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras, Linear Algebra Appl., 610 (2021), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2020.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2020.10.009
    [17] E. Zelmanov, Infinite algebras and pro-p groups, In: Infinite groups: Geometric, combinatorial and dynamical aspects, Progress in Mathematics, Vol. 248, Basel: Birkhäuser, 2005,403–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7447-0_11
    [18] J. Zhou, Y. Wang, The images of completely homogeneous polynomials on 2×2 upper triangular matrix algebras, Algebra. Represent. Theory, 24 (2021), 1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-020-09986-6 doi: 10.1007/s10468-020-09986-6
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Thiago Castilho de Mello, Daniela do Nascimento Rodrigues, 2023, Chapter 13, 978-3-031-32706-3, 185, 10.1007/978-3-031-32707-0_13
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1797) PDF downloads(94) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog