Some properties for certain class of bi-univalent functions defined by $ q $-Cătaş operator with bounded boundary rotation

S. M. Madian; S. M. Madian

doi:10.3934/math.2022053

AIMS Mathematics

2022, Volume 7, Issue 1: 903-914. doi: 10.3934/math.2022053

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Some properties for certain class of bi-univalent functions defined by $q$ -Cătaş operator with bounded boundary rotation

S. M. Madian ^,

Basic Sciences Department, Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, New Damietta, Egypt

Received: 01 August 2021 Accepted: 27 September 2021 Published: 18 October 2021
MSC : 30C45

Throughout the paper, we introduce a new subclass $\mathcal{H}_{\alpha, \mu, \rho, m, \beta }^{n, q, \lambda, l}\ f(z)$ by using the Bazilevič functions with the idea of bounded boundary rotation and $q$ -analogue Cătaş operator. Also we find the estimate of the coefficients for functions in this class. Finally, in the concluding section, we have chosen to reiterate the well-demonstrated fact that any attempt to produce the rather straightforward $(p, q)$ -variations of the results, which we have presented in this article, will be a rather trivial and inconsequential exercise, simply because the additional parameter $p$ is obviously redundant.

Keywords:

bi-univalent functions,
$q$ -analogue Cătaş operator, Bazilevič functions,
bounded boundary rotation

Citation: S. M. Madian. Some properties for certain class of bi-univalent functions defined by $q$ -Cătaş operator with bounded boundary rotation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 903-914. doi: 10.3934/math.2022053

Related Papers:

[1]	Aissa Boukarou, Kaddour Guerbati, Khaled Zennir, Mohammad Alnegga . Gevrey regularity for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili I (gKP-I) equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 10037-10054. doi: 10.3934/math.2021583
[2]	Xiaochun Sun, Yulian Wu, Gaoting Xu . Global well-posedness for the 3D rotating Boussinesq equations in variable exponent Fourier-Besov spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27065-27079. doi: 10.3934/math.20231385
[3]	Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Fahim Ud Din, Wedad Albalawi, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty . Analysis of stochastic delay differential equations in the framework of conformable fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11194-11211. doi: 10.3934/math.2024549
[4]	William O. Bray, Ellen Hunter . Wave equations & energy. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 463-481. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.463
[5]	Phuong Nguyen Duc, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Van Tien Nguyen, Anh Tuan Nguyen . Remarks on parabolic equation with the conformable variable derivative in Hilbert scales. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20020-20042. doi: 10.3934/math.20221095
[6]	Kedong Wang, Xianguo Geng, Mingming Chen, Ruomeng Li . Long-time asymptotics for the generalized Sasa-Satsuma equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7413-7437. doi: 10.3934/math.2020475
[7]	Said Mesloub, Faten Aldosari . Well posedness for a singular two dimensional fractional initial boundary value problem with Bessel operator involving boundary integral conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9786-9812. doi: 10.3934/math.2021569
[8]	Zhongdi Cen, Jian Huang, Aimin Xu . A posteriori mesh method for a system of singularly perturbed initial value problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16719-16732. doi: 10.3934/math.2022917
[9]	Murat A. Sultanov, Vladimir E. Misilov, Makhmud A. Sadybekov . Numerical method for solving the subdiffusion differential equation with nonlocal boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36385-36404. doi: 10.3934/math.20241726
[10]	Dumitru Baleanu, Babak Shiri . Generalized fractional differential equations for past dynamic. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14394-14418. doi: 10.3934/math.2022793

Abstract

1. Introduction

Fractional calculus (FC) is a study of derivatives and integration of arbitrary order. At the initial phases of its development, it was considered an abstract mathematical idea with nearly no applications. But, now the situation is entirely different with FC and is considered to be the most useful and important topic among the scientific community. The various important phenomena of science and engineering have been well described with the use of fractional derivatives, including, partial bed-load transport, diffusion model, dynamics of earthquakes, viscoelastic systems, biological systems, chaos, and wave propagation, (see ^{[1,2,3,7,8,9,10,41,42]}) and references therein. The nonlocal property of the fractional operators makes them more efficient for modeling the various problems of physics, fluid dynamics and their related disciplines, (see ^{[17,18,43,44]}).

Most of the classical (integer order) and FDEs are not possible to solve analytically, therefore, some reliable numerical methods and semi-analytical methods have been developed to solve them. Some of them are presented as follows: In ^[34], the authors extended the study of ^[45] to solve numerically the Caputo type tempered fractional integro-differential equations. In ^[36], the authors solved the various kind of Riemann problems by developing a mixed-method, namely, the characteristic Adomian decomposition method (CADM) which is the improved form of ADM. In ^[38], the authors constructed the power series solution of the time-fractional Majda-Biello system by applying the Lie group analysis. For more information on Lie group analysis and its applications, (see ^[35]). In ^[39], the authors investigated the behaviour of cavitation models together with thermodynamic effects by developing a compressible, two-phase, one-fluid Navier-Stokes solver. In ^[40], the authors presented the analytical and computational study of the drift-flux two-phase flow model. The analytical solution of the model is based on the analytical solution of the Riemann problem which consists of two different nonlinear algebraic equations in velocity equilibrium and pressure nonequilibrium between the two-phase systems. The numerical solution is obtained by using the finite volume methods. In ^[37], the authors implemented a void ratio transport-equation model in a one-fluid two-phase compressible software by proposing a various numerical techniques which are based on a finite volume approach, including, HLLC, Rusanov, VF Roe, Jameson-Schmidt-Turkel and AUSM. For more detail on transport-equation and its applications, (see ^[33]). In ^[43], the authors proposed the fully discretized finite element approximations to solve the time-fractional diffusion equations of variable-order.

Orthogonal polynomials coupled with operational matrices of fractional derivatives operators defined with singular or nonsingular kernels have played a significant role in the development of the spectral methods. The most commonly used methods are Spectral tau methods, and Spectral collocation methods. These methods have been successfully used to find the approximate solution of a large class of multi-order ordinary and partial FDEs. Some of them are presented as follows: In ^[13], the authors solved the multi-order (MOFDEs) by combining the technique of operational matrices with Spectral tau and Spectral collocation methods. In ^[14], the authors solved the MOFDEs by using the Chebyshev operational matrix (COM) together with Spectral tau and Spectral collocation methods. In ^[15], the authors solved the MOFDEs by reducing them into a system of FDEs, then combining the COM with Spectral tau and Spectral collocation methods. In ^[19], the authors derived the derivative operational matrix in Caputo sense of FLFVs which then applied with Spectral tau method to solve MOFDEs. In ^[20], the authors derived the integral COM in Riemann-Liouville sense which then applied with Spectral tau method to solve numerically the MOFDEs. In ^[22], the author derived the Jacobi integral operational matrix in Riemann-Liouville sense which then applied with Spectral tau method to solve MOFDEs. However, these methods have certain numerical difficulties in applying: in spectral tau methods, the residual function must be expanded as a series of orthogonal polynomials and then the initial or boundary conditions are applied as constraints; whereas in spectral collocation methods, the requirement of the choice of the suitable collocation points are necessary and FDEs must be satisfied exactly at these points.

In this article, we propose a numerical method which is completely based on the fractional derivative and integral operational matrices of FLFVs. The proposed method is independent of the choice of the suitable collocation points and expansion of the residual function as a series of orthogonal polynomials. Consequently, the proposed method produces high efficient numerical results as compared to the Spectral tau method ^[13], Bessel collocation method ^[6], Taylor matrix method ^[5], function approximation theory ^[21], and stochastic technique ^[4]. The other novel aspect of our article is the development of new integral and derivative operational matrices in Riemann-Liouville and Caputo senses respectively. As an applications of the proposed method, we solve various MOFDEs corresponding to initial conditions. Our approach has ability to reduce the MOFDEs into a system of Sylvester types matrix equations which can be solved using MATLAB built in function lyap(.). The rest of the article is organized as follows:

In Section 2, some preliminaries definitions of FC are recalled. In Section 3, the analytical expressions and some useful properties of CSLPs are reviewed. Moreover, in the same section some important properties of FLFVs and its analytical expression are recalled. In Section 4, the new generalized integral operational matrix and derivative operational matrix of FLFVs in the senses of Riemann-Liouville and Caputo are derived. In Section 5, based on the results of Section 4, a numerical method is proposed which is an excellent tool to solve numerically the MOFDEs corresponding to initial conditions. In Section 6, the validity and the efficiency of the proposed numerical method is tested by solving various examples and comparing the results with other methods in the literature. Some concluding remarks and future directions are given in Section 7.

2. Preliminary remarks on FC

Some important definitions and results are recalled in this section which are indispensable to construct the proposed numerical algorithm.

Definition 1. The (left-hand side) Riemann-Liouville integral of order $\Omega > 0$ is given as (see ^[12]):

$\begin{eqnarray} _{RL}J^{\Omega}u(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\Omega)}\int_{0}^{x}(x-t)^{\Omega-1}u(t)dt, \; \; x > 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.1)

Definition 2. The (left-hand side) Caputo derivative of order $\Omega > 0$ is given as (see ^[12]):

$\begin{equation} _{C} \mathcal{D}^\Omega u(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{d^{n}u(x)}{dx^{n}}, \quad \Omega = n\in \mathbb{N}, \\ _{RL}J^{n-\Omega}u^{(n)}(x), \quad n-1 < \Omega < n \ , \, n\in\mathbb{N}, \end{cases} \end{equation}$

(2.2)

where $n$ is an integer, $x > 0$ , and $u(x)\in C^{n}[0, 1]$ .

For the Caputo derivative, we have the following observations:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} _C \mathcal{D}^\Omega K& = 0, \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; K\; \text{is a constant. } \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.3)

$\begin{equation} _C \mathcal{D}^{\Omega} x^{\mu} = \begin{cases} 0, \quad \text{for}\; \; \mu\in \mathbb{R_{+}}, \; \text{and} \quad \mu < \lceil\Omega\rceil, \\ \frac{\Gamma(\mu+1)}{\Gamma(\mu+1-\Omega)}x^{\mu-\Omega}, \text{for}\; \; \mu\in \mathbb{R_{+}}, \; \text{and} \quad \mu\geq\lceil\Omega\rceil. \end{cases} \end{equation}$

(2.4)

3. FLFVs and its properties

Many approximate techniques are available in the literature to solve numerically the FDEs but the most frequent used approach is the approximation of the solutions via series expansion of the type, $\sum_{k = 0}^{M}d_{k}t^{k\Omega}$ . Thus the choice of the appropriate orthogonal function of the type $\Psi(t) = \sum_{k = 0}^{M}d_{k}t^{k\Omega}$ is very important to get the good approximate results.

In recent, the authors in ^[23] worked on the development of the fractional representation of the classical Legendre polynomials using the well-known Rodrigues formula. However, it is difficult to solve FDEs with this proposed fractional extension due to complexity involved in these functions, so in order to obtain the solution of FDEs, in a much simpler and efficient manner, Kazem and coauthors generated the orthogonal FLFVs based on the orthogonal CSLPs to find the approximate solutions of linear and nonlinear FDEs (see ^[19]). In this section, the definition and some useful properties of orthogonal CSLPs and its fractional extension are reviewed.

3.1. Classical Shifted Legendre Polynomials (CSLPs)

The following recurrence formulae is used to evaluate the orthogonal Legendre polynomials (LPs) on the interval of orthogonality $[-1, 1]$ (see ^[11]):

$\begin{eqnarray} &&R_{j+1}(x) = \frac{2j+1}{j+1}x R_{j}(x)-\frac{j}{j+1}R_{j-1}(x), \; \; j = 1, 2, \cdots, \\ &&\text{where}\\ &&R_0(x) = 1, \; \; R_1(x) = x. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

Now by setting, $x = 2t-1$ in (3.1), the CSLPs on the interval of orthogonality $[0, 1]$ can be expressed as following, (see ^[11])

$\begin{eqnarray} &&R_{j}(t) = \frac{(2j+1)(2t-1)}{j+1} R_{j}(t)-\frac{j}{j+1}R_{j-1}(t), \; \; j = 1, 2, \cdots, \\ &&\text{where}\\ &&R_0(t) = 1, \; \; R_1(t) = 2t-1. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.2)

The analytical expression of (3.2) is as following

$\begin{eqnarray} &&R_{j}(t) = \sum\limits_{r = 0}^{j}a_{r, j}t^r, \\ &&\text{where}\\ &&a_{r, j} = (-1)^{r+j}\frac{\Gamma(1+r+j)}{\Gamma(1-r+j)(\Gamma(1+r))^{2}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

The orthogonality conditions of CSLPs can be expressed as

$\begin{eqnarray} \int_{0}^{1}R_{j}(t)R_{i}(t) = \begin{cases}\frac{1}{2j+1}, \quad \text{for}\; j = i, \\ 0, \quad \text{for}\; j\neq i. \end{cases} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.4)

3.2. Analytical expression and properties of FLFVs

The orthogonal FLFVs is defined in the following relation by changing the variable, $t$ with $z^{\Omega}, \; \Omega\in\mathbb{R^{+}}$ in orthogonal CSLPs defined in (3.2). For our convenience, we use the notation $FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z)$ to represent the FLFVs ( $R_{j}(z^{\Omega})$ ).

$\begin{eqnarray} &&FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z) = \frac{(2j+1)(2z^{\Omega}-1)}{j+1} FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z)-\frac{j}{j+1}FR^{\Omega}_{j-1}(z), \; \; j = 1, 2, \cdots, \\ &&\text{where}\\ &&FR^{\Omega}_0(z) = 1, \; \; FR^{\Omega}_1(z) = 2z^{\Omega}-1. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.5)

The analytical representation of (3.5) is as following

$\begin{eqnarray} &&FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}a'_{q, j}z^{q\Omega}, \\ &&\text{where}\\ &&a'_{q, j} = (-1)^{q+j}\frac{\Gamma(1+q+j)}{\Gamma(1-q+j)(\Gamma(1+q))^{2}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.6)

The orthogonality conditions of FLFVs can be expressed as

$\begin{eqnarray} \int_{0}^{1}FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z)FR^{\Omega}_{i}(z)w(z)dz = \begin{cases}\frac{1}{\Omega(2j+1)}, \quad \text{for}\; j = i, \\ 0, \quad \text{for}\; j\neq i, \end{cases} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.7)

where $w(z) = z^{\Omega-1}$ is a weight function.

3.3. Functions approximation using FLFVs

If $u(z)\in L^2[0, 1]$ , then it can be demonstrated as a series expansion of orthogonal FLFVs, as

$\begin{eqnarray} u(z) = \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{\infty}e_jFR^{\Omega}_{j}(z). \end{eqnarray}$

(3.8)

Using (3.7), the coefficients $e_j$ can be determined as

$\begin{eqnarray} e_j = \Omega(2j+1)\int_{0}^{1}u(z)FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z)w(z)dz, \; \; j = 0, 1, 2, \cdots. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.9)

For the practicality, considering the first $n+1$ -terms of (3.8), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} u(z)\simeq &\sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} e_jFR^{\Omega}_{j}(z), \\ = &(\Lambda)^T\Psi(z), \end{eqnarray}$

(3.10)

where

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{coefcntvector} (\Lambda)^T = [e_0, e_1, \cdots, e_n], \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \Psi(z) = [FR^{\Omega}_{0}(z), FR^{\Omega}_{1}(z), FR^{\Omega}_{2}(z), \cdots, FR^{\Omega}_{n}(z)]^{T}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.11)

For $n = 4, \Omega = 1/2$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Psi(z) = \left(\begin{array}{c} 1\\ 2\, \sqrt{z} - 1\\ 6\, z - 6\, \sqrt{z} + 1\\ 12\, \sqrt{z} - 30\, z + 20\, z^{\frac{3}{2}} - 1\\ 90\, z + 70\, z^2 - 20\, \sqrt{z} - 140\, z^{\frac{3}{2}} + 1 \end{array}\right), \end{eqnarray*}$

and for $u(z) = 1+z$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} (\Lambda)^T = \left(\begin{array}{ccccc} \frac{4}{3} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{6} & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right). \end{eqnarray*}$

4. Operational matrices of FLFVs

Operational matrices approach together with Spectral Tau approach is among of the approaches that has been frequently used to solve numerically the ordinary and partial FDEs (see ^{[13,14,15,19,20,21,22,24,25,26]}) and references therein. Under this approach, the numerical solutions are obtained by reducing the under study FDEs both ordinary and partial to an equivalent system of algebraic equations. The solution of the algebraic equations leads to the solution of the original FDEs. In recent, the authors in ^[19] extended the study of the generalized derivative operational matrix of CSLPs ^[13] to the generalized derivative operational matrix of orthogonal FLFVs in Caputo sense to solve numerically the multi-order FDEs. In this section, based on the study in ^[13,19], we develop the new generalized integral operational matrix of orthogonal FLFVs in Riemann-Liouville sense.

Lemma 4.1. The Caputo derivative of order $\beta > 0$ of FLFVs can be expressed as

$\begin{eqnarray} _{C} \mathcal{D}^\beta FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}a''_{(q, j)}\frac{\Gamma(q\Omega+1)}{\Gamma(q\Omega-\beta+1)}z^{q\Omega-\beta}, \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

where $a''_{(q, j)} = 0$ when $q\Omega\in\mathbb{R_{+}}$ and $q\Omega < \beta$ . For other cases, $a''_{(q, j)} = a'_{(q, j)}$ .

Proof. For the proof (see ^[19]).

Lemma 4.2. The Riemann Liouville integral of order $\alpha > 0$ of FLFVs can be expressed as

$\begin{eqnarray} _{RL}J^{\alpha}FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}a'_{(q, j)}\frac{\Gamma(q\Omega+1)}{\Gamma(q\Omega+\alpha+1)}z^{q\Omega+\alpha}. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.2)

Proof. Using linearity property and Eq (3.5), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} _{RL}J^{\alpha}FR^{\Omega}_{j}(z) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}a'_{(q, j)} {RL}J^{\alpha} z^{q\Omega} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.3)

Now the lemma can be proved easily using (^[27], Eq (22)).

Lemma 4.3. Suppose, $\Omega\in\mathbb{R_{+}}$ , and $\alpha > 0$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} &&z^{\alpha+q\Omega} = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n}c'_{(r, i)}FR^{\Omega}_{i}(z), \\ &&\mathit{{where}}\\ &&c'_{(r, i)} = \Omega\left(2i+1\right)\sum\limits_{r = 0}^{i}\frac{(-1)^{(i+r)}\Gamma(i+r+1)}{\Gamma(i-r+1)(\Gamma(r+1))^{2}\Omega\left(q+1+r\right)+\alpha}, \; i = 0, 1, \cdots, n.\\ \end{eqnarray}$

(4.4)

Proof. Using $(n+1)$ orthogonal FLFVs, we may approximate $z^{\beta+q\Omega}$ , as

$\begin{eqnarray} z^{\alpha+q\Omega}\approx\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n}c'_{(r, i)}FR^{\Omega}_{i}(z). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.5)

Using Eq (3.9), and after doing some lengthy calculations, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} c'_{(r, i)} = \Omega\left(2i+1\right)\sum\limits_{r = 0}^{i}\frac{(-1)^{(i+r)}\Gamma(i+r+1)}{\Gamma(i-r+1)(\Gamma(r+1))^{2}\Omega\left(q+1+r\right)+\alpha}. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.6)

Now using the Eqs (4.5) and (4.6), we can obtain the required result.

Lemma 4.4. Suppose, $\Omega\in\mathbb{R_{+}}$ , and $\beta > 0$ , then

$\begin{eqnarray} &&z^{q\Omega-\beta} = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n}c''_{(r, i)}FR^{\Omega}_{i}(z), \\ &&\mathit{{where}}\\ &&c''_{(i)} = \Omega\left(2i+1\right)\sum\limits_{r = 0}^{i}\frac{(-1)^{(i+r)}\Gamma(i+r+1)}{\Gamma(i-r+1)(\Gamma(r+1))^{2}\Omega\left(q+1+r\right)-\beta}, \; i = 0, 1, \cdots, n.\\ \end{eqnarray}$

(4.7)

Proof. Using $(n+1)$ orthogonal FLFVs, we may approximate $z^{q\Omega-\beta}$ , as

$\begin{eqnarray} z^{q\Omega-\beta}\approx\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n}c''_{(r, i)}FR^{\Omega}_{i}(z). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.8)

Using Eq (3.9), and after doing some lengthy calculations, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} c''_{(i)} = \Omega\left(2i+1\right)\sum\limits_{r = 0}^{i}\frac{(-1)^{(i+r)}\Gamma(i+r+1)}{\Gamma(i-r+1)(\Gamma(r+1))^{2}\Omega\left(q+1+r\right)-\beta}. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.9)

Now using the Eqs (4.8) and (4.9), we can obtain the required result.

4.1. The fractional integral and derivative operational matrices of FLFVs

In this section, the generalized operational matrices of fractional integral and fractional derivative for FLFVs in Riemann Liouville and Caputo senses are studied respectively.

Theorem 4.5. Suppose $\Psi(z)$ be the orthogonal FLFVs as defined in $(3.11)$ , and $\alpha > 0$ be the order of the integral consider in Riemann-Liouville sense, then

$\begin{eqnarray} _{RL}J^{\alpha}\Psi(z)\approx \mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z), \end{eqnarray}$

(4.10)

where $\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}$ is the $(n+1)\times(n+1)$ operational matrix which can be computed as

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)} = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}\frac{a'_{(q, j)c'_{(r, i)}}\Gamma(q\Omega+1)}{(q\Omega+\alpha+1)}, \; j = 0, 1, \cdots, n. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.11)

Proof. Using (3.11) and linearity of Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} _{RL}J^{\alpha}\Psi(z) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}a'_{(q, j)} {_{RL}}J^{\alpha}(z^{q\Omega}) \end{eqnarray}$

(4.12)

Using lemma (4.2), Eq (4.11) can be expressed as

$\begin{eqnarray} _{RL}J^{\alpha}\Psi(z) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}a'_{(q, j)}\frac{\Gamma(q\Omega+1)}{\Gamma(q\Omega+\alpha+1)}z^{\alpha+q\Omega}. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.13)

Now Eq (4.13) and Lemma 4.3 proves the required result.

Remark 4.6. The operational matrix of integration for CSLPs studied by Khan and Khalil ^[24] is a special case of Theorem 4.5 for $\Omega = 1$ .

Theorem 4.7. Suppose $\Psi(z)$ be the orthogonal FLFVs as defined in $(3.11)$ , and $\beta > 0$ be the order of the derivative consider in Caputo sense, then

$\begin{eqnarray} _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta}\Psi(z)\approx \mathbf{Q}^{\beta}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z), \end{eqnarray}$

(4.14)

where $\mathbf{Q}^{\beta}$ is the $(n+1)\times(n+1)$ operational matrix which can be computed as

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{Q}^{\beta}_{(n+1, n+1)} = \sum\limits_{q = \frac{\lceil\beta\rceil}{\Omega}}^{j}\frac{a'_{(q, j)c''_{(r, i)}}\Gamma(q\Omega+1)}{(q\Omega-\beta+1)}, \; j = \frac{\lceil\beta\rceil}{\Omega}, \frac{\lceil\beta\rceil}{\Omega}+1, \cdots. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.15)

Proof. Using (3.11) and linearity of Caputo fractional derivative, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta}\Psi(z) = \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{j}a'_{(q, j)}{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta}(z^{q\Omega}) \end{eqnarray}$

(4.16)

Using lemma (4.1), Eq (4.16) can be expressed as

$\begin{eqnarray} _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta}\Psi(z) = \sum\limits_{q = \frac{\lceil\beta\rceil}{\Omega}}^{j}a'_{(q, j)}\frac{\Gamma(q\Omega+1)}{\Gamma(q\Omega-\beta+1)}z^{q\Omega-\beta}. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.17)

Now Eq (4.17) and lemma (4.4) proves the required result.

Remark 4.8. The operational matrix of derivatives for CSLPs studied by Saadatmandi and Dehghan ^[13] is a special case of Theorem 4.7 for $\Omega = 1$ .

5. Solution of multi-order FDEs

In this section, we are interested in the development of the computational algorithm to solve numerically the following generalized multi-order FDEs

$\begin{align} _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\alpha}u(z)& = g\big(z, u(z), _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta_{1}}u(z), _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta_{2}}u(z), \dots, \; _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta_{n}}u(z)\big), \\ \; \; &u^{(s)}(0) = h_{s}, \; s = 0, 1, \dots, n. \end{align}$

(5.1)

where $n-1 < \alpha \leq n$ , $0 < \beta_{1} < \beta_{2} < \dots < \beta_{n} < \alpha$ , and $_{C}\mathcal{D}^{\alpha}$ is a Caputo derivative of order $\alpha$ defined in (2.2).

We are interested to approximate the solution in terms of orthogonal FLFVs, such that

$\begin{eqnarray} _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\alpha}u(z) = \Lambda^{T}\Psi(z). \end{eqnarray}$

(5.2)

Now integrating (5.2) in Riemann-Liouville sense and using the initial conditions $u^{(s)}(0) = h_{s}, \; s = 0, 1, \dots, n$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray} u(z) = \Lambda^{T}J^{\alpha}\Psi(z)+\sum\limits_{s = 0}^{n}h_{s}z^{s}. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.3)

Using Theorem 4.5, Eq (5.3) can also be written as

$\begin{eqnarray} u(z) = \Lambda^{T}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z)+\sum\limits_{s = 0}^{n}h_{s}z^{s}. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.4)

The terms in $\sum_{s = 0}^{n}h_{s}z^{s}$ can also be approximated using FLFVs. So, Eq (5.4) can also be written as

$\begin{eqnarray} u(z) = \Lambda^{T}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z)+H^{T}\Psi(z). \end{eqnarray}$

(5.5)

Now using Theorem 4.7 and Eq (5.5), the right hand side terms of Eq (5.1) can be approximated as

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{cases} _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta_{0}}u(z) = \Lambda^{T}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{0}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z)+H^{T}\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{0}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z), \\ _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta_{1}}u(z) = \Lambda^{T}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{1}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z)+H^{T}\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{1}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z), \\ \vdots \quad \vdots \quad \vdots\\ _{C}\mathcal{D}^{\beta_{n}}u(z) = \Lambda^{T}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{n}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z)+H^{T}\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{n}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\Psi(z), \\ \text{and}\\ g(z) = G^{T}\Psi(z). \end{cases} \end{eqnarray}$

(5.6)

Now inserting (5.2) and (5.6) in (5.1), we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{multii7} \Lambda^{T}\Psi(z)& = &\Lambda^{T}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\left(\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{0}}_{(n+1, n+1)}+\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{1}}_{(n+1, n+1)}+\cdots+\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{n}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\right)\Psi(z)\nonumber\\ &+&H^{T}\left(\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{0}}_{(n+1, n+1)}+\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{1}}_{(n+1, n+1)}+\cdots+\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{n}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\right)\Psi(z)+G^{T}\Psi(z). \end{eqnarray*}$

After simplification, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \Lambda^{T}-\Lambda^{T}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}_{(n+1, n+1)}\widehat{Q}-H^{T}\widehat{Q}-G^{T}, \end{eqnarray}$

(5.7)

where $\widehat{Q} = \left(\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{0}}_{(n+1, n+1)}+\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{1}}_{(n+1, n+1)}+\cdots+\mathbf{Q}^{\beta_{n}}_{(n+1, n+1)}\right)$ .

Equation (5.7) is a matrix equation of Sylvester type that can be easily solved for the unknown $\Lambda^{T}$ using any computational software. By inserting the values of $\Lambda^{T}$ in Eq (5.5), we get the approximate solution of (5.1).

6. Test Examples

In this section, the applicability of the method is studied by solving various examples and comparing their analytical solutions with the approximate solutions obtained using our developed computational numerical algorithm.

Example 1. We consider the following non-homogeneous Bagley-Torvik equation ^[13,19,28]

$\begin{eqnarray} _{C}\mathcal{D}^{2}u(z)+_{C}\mathcal{D}^{\frac{3}{2}}u(z)+u(z) = 1+z, \end{eqnarray}$

(6.1)

subject to the following initial conditions

$\begin{eqnarray} u(0) = 1 = u'(0). \end{eqnarray}$

(6.2)

The exact solution is given as under

$\begin{eqnarray} u(z) = 1+z. \end{eqnarray}$

(6.3)

Here, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} G^{T} = \left[\frac{3}{2}, \frac{1}{2}, 0\right], \; \; H^{T} = \left[\frac{3}{2}, \frac{1}{2}, 0\right], \; \; \Lambda^{T} = \left[0, 0, 0\right]. \end{eqnarray}$

(6.4)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{Q}^{\frac{3}{2}} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 9.0270 & 5.4162 & -1.2896 \end{bmatrix} , \mathbf{D}^{2} = \begin{bmatrix} 0.1667 & 0.2500 & 0.0833\\ -0.0833 & -0.1000 & 0\\ 0.0167 & 0 & -0.0238 \end{bmatrix}.\\ \end{eqnarray}$

(6.5)

Using (6.4) and (6.5) in (5.5), we get the exact solution of the problem (6.1)-(6.2).

Remark 6.1. The results of Example 1 at various values of $n$ obtained by using our method are compared with the results obtained by using the method ^[4] at $n = 10$ in Tables 1- and . We observe that at various values of $n$ (the number of terms of FLFVs), the exact solution and the approximate solution obtained by using our method coincide, (see Table 2 and Figure 5). However, the results obtained by using the method in ^[4] yield less accurate results, (see Table 2-4 and Figure 5).

Table 1. Comparison of the approximate solution (AS) for Example 1 obtained by using our proposed method (PM) with the AS obtained by using the method (^[4], Example 2).

$z$	Exact Solution	AS using PM at $n=2$	AS in ^[4] at $n=10$ (number of neurons)

$0$	$1.00$	$1.00$	$1.024862$
$0.1$	$1.10$	$1.10$	$1.121206$
$0.2$	$1.20$	$1.20$	$1.220821$
$0.3$	$1.30$	$1.30$	$1.323041$
$0.4$	$1.40$	$1.40$	$1.426952$
$0.5$	$1.50$	$1.50$	$1.531330$
$0.6$	$1.60$	$1.60$	$1.634569$
$0.7$	$1.70$	$1.70$	$1.734591$
$0.8$	$1.80$	$1.80$	$1.828738$
$0.9$	$1.90$	$1.90$	$1.913640$
$1.0$	$2.00$	$2.00$	$1.985057$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 2. Comparison of the Absolute errors for Example 1 obtained by using our proposed method (PM) at

$n = 2$ (number of terms of FLFVs) with the absolute errors obtained by using the method (^[4], Example 2) at

$n = 10$ (number of neurons).

$z$	Absolute error using ^[4]	Absolute error using PM

$0$	$2.30e-2$	$0$
$0.1$	$2.69e-2$	$0$
$0.2$	$3.13e-2$	$0$
$0.3$	$3.45e-2$	$0$
$0.4$	$3.45e-2$	$0$
$0.5$	$2.87e-2$	$0$
$0.6$	$1.36e-2$	$0$
$0.7$	$1.49e-2$	$0$
$0.8$	$2.30e-2$	$0$
$0.9$	$2.69e-2$	$0$
$1.0$	$3.13e-2$	$0$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 3. Comparison of the Absolute errors for Example 1 obtained by using our proposed method (PM) at

$n = 8$ (number of terms of FLFVs) with the absolute errors obtained by using the method (^[4], Example 2) at

$n = 10$ (number of neurons).

$z$	Absolute error using ^[4]	Absolute error using PM
$0$	$2.30e-2$	$0$
$0.1$	$2.69e-2$	$0$
$0.2$	$3.13e-2$	$0$
$0.3$	$3.45e-2$	$0$
$0.4$	$3.45e-2$	$0$
$0.5$	$2.87e-2$	$0$
$0.6$	$1.36e-2$	$0$
$0.7$	$1.49e-2$	$0$
$0.8$	$2.30e-2$	$0$
$0.9$	$2.69e-2$	$0$
$1.0$	$3.13e-2$	$0$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 4. Comparison of the Absolute errors for Example 1 obtained by using our proposed method (PM) at

$n = 10$ (number of terms of FLFVs) with the absolute errors obtained by using the method (^[4], Example 2) at

$n = 10$ (number of neurons).

$z$	Absolute error using ^[4]	Absolute error using PM
$0$	$2.30e-2$	$0$
$0.1$	$2.69e-2$	$0$
$0.2$	$3.13e-2$	$0$
$0.3$	$3.45e-2$	$0$
$0.4$	$3.45e-2$	$0$
$0.5$	$2.87e-2$	$0$
$0.6$	$1.36e-2$	$0$
$0.7$	$1.49e-2$	$0$
$0.8$	$2.30e-2$	$0$
$0.9$	$2.69e-2$	$0$
$1.0$	$3.13e-2$	$0$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Figure 1. FLFVs are plotted for

$\Omega = 1/2$ and for various choices of

$n$ .

$z$	Exact solution	AS using PM at $n=2$	AS in ^[5] at $n=6$ (number of terms of Taylor series)

$0$	$1.00$	$1.00$	$1.00$
$0.1$	$1.10$	$1.10$	$1.10$
$0.2$	$1.20$	$1.20$	$1.20$
$0.3$	$1.30$	$1.30$	$1.30$
$0.4$	$1.40$	$1.40$	$1.40$
$0.5$	$1.50$	$1.50$	$1.50$
$0.6$	$1.60$	$1.60$	$1.60$
$0.7$	$1.70$	$1.70$	$1.70$
$0.8$	$1.80$	$1.80$	$1.80$
$0.9$	$1.90$	$1.90$	$1.90$
$1.0$	$2.00$	$2.00$	$2.00$

$z$	Exact solution	AS using PM at $n=2$	AS in ^[6] at $n=6$ (number of terms of Bessel series)

$0$	$1.00$	$1.00$	$1.00$
$0.1$	$1.10$	$1.10$	$1.10$
$0.2$	$1.20$	$1.20$	$1.20$
$0.3$	$1.30$	$1.30$	$1.30$
$0.4$	$1.40$	$1.40$	$1.40$
$0.5$	$1.50$	$1.50$	$1.50$
$0.6$	$1.60$	$1.60$	$1.60$
$0.7$	$1.70$	$1.70$	$1.70$
$0.8$	$1.80$	$1.80$	$1.80$
$0.9$	$1.90$	$1.90$	$1.90$
$1.0$	$2.00$	$2.00$	$2.00$

$z$	$n=4$ ^[21]	$n=4$ PM	$n=6$ ^[21]	$n=6$ PM	$n=7$ ^[21]	$n=7$ PM

$0.2$	0.0844	0.0132	0.0044	0.00003	2.81025203108243e-15	0
$0.4$	0.3501	0.0105	0.0079	0.00035	6.63358257213531e-15	0
$0.6$	0.6734	0.0349	0.0143	0.00034	3.27515792264421e-15	0
$0.8$	1.0234	0.0387	0.0214	0.00069	4.25770529943748e-14	0
$1$	1.6700	0.0780	0.0280	0.00103	2.43819897540083e-13	0

$z$	Exact solution	$n=2$ ^[21]	$n=2$ PM	$n=3$ ^[21]	$n=3$ PM

$0.2$	0.0080	0.0614	0.0291	2.55004350968591e-16	0
$0.4$	0.0640	0.1541	0.0885	2.77555756156289e-16	0
$0.6$	0.2160	0.3339	0.1239	3.33066907387547e-16	0
$0.8$	0.5120	0.6488	0.0875	4.44089209850063e-16	0
$1$	1.0000	1.1468	0.0689	6.66133814775094e-16	0

$z$	$\Omega=\alpha=\frac{3}{4}$	$\Omega=\alpha=\frac{1}{2}$	$\Omega=\alpha=\frac{2}{3}$

$0.2$	4.273327e-11	5.870078e-07	9.236112e-10
$0.4$	8.335039e-09	2.999352e-05	1.401714e-07
$0.6$	2.455070e-07	3.010034e-04	2.873981e-06
$0.8$	2.731391e-06	1.568348e-03	2.478263e-05
$1$	1.782081e-05	5.703710e-03	1.328454e-04

$\alpha$	$z=0.1$	$z=0.1 PM$	$z=0.3$	$z=0.3 PM$	$z=0.5$	$z=0.5 PM$	$z=0.7$	$z=0.7 PM$	$z=0.9$	$z=0.9 PM$

$1.2$	3.1e-03	2.2e-05	2.8e-03	1.9e-05	4.5e-03	1.2e-05	3.6e-03	1.6e-05	1.8e-03	2.0e-05
$1.4$	1.0e-03	1.6e-05	7.0e-04	1.4e-05	1.3e-03	7.9e-06	1.1e-03	1.1e-05	2.4e-04	1.4e-05
$1.6$	3.0e-04	7.5e-06	1.3e-04	6.3e-06	3.1e-04	3.4e-06	3.0e-04	4.9e-06	6.2e-07	6.1e-06
$1.8$	6.1e-05	2.2e-06	1.4e-05	1.8e-06	4.9e-05	9.2e-07	5.3e-05	1.4e-06	8.8e-06	1.7e-06

$0.2$	2.9e-01	2.3e-03	4.5e-01	1.9e-02	7.4e-01	5.3e-02	3.7e-01	1.0e-01	2.0e-01	1.8e-01
$0.4$	3.9e-01	7.0e-04	5.1e-01	1.0e-03	7.3e-01	1.5e-03	3.3e-01	2.4e-03	2.2e-01	8.2e-03
$0.6$	6.7e-03	3.8e-04	2.0e-05	4.4e-04	5.2e-03	3.32e-04	4.4e-03	3.42e-04	4.6e-03	3.41e-04
$0.8$	1.1e-03	1.1e-04	2.1e-04	1.14e-04	8.4e-04	7.8e-05	8.7e-04	9.5e-05	5.8e-04	1.2e-04

[1]	F. Al-Aboudi, On univalent functions defined by a generalized Sălăgean operator, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 27 (2004), 481–494. doi: 10.1155/S0161171204108090. doi: 10.1155/S0161171204108090
[2]	B. Ahmad, M. G. Khan, B. A. Frasin, M. K. Aouf, T. Abdeljawad, W. K. Mashwani, et al., On $q$ -analogue of meromorphic multivalent functions in lemniscate of Bernoulli domain, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 3037–3052. doi: 10.3934/math.2021185. doi: 10.3934/math.2021185
[3]	Q. Z. Ahmad, N. Khan, M. Raza, M. Tahir, B. Khan, Certain $q$ -difference operators and their applications to the subclass of meromorphic $q$ -starlike functions, Filomat, 33 (2019), 3385–3397. doi: 10.2298/FIL1911385A. doi: 10.2298/FIL1911385A
[4]	M. K. Aouf, A generalization of functions with real part bounded in the mean on the unit disc, Math. Japonica., 33 (1988), 175–182.
[5]	M. K. Aouf, Generalization of certain subclasses of multivalent functions with negative coefficients defined by using a differential operator, Math. Comput. Model., 50 (2009), 1367–1378. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.08.026. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.08.026
[6]	M. K. Aouf, On certain multivalent functions with negative coefficients defined by using a differential operator, Mat. Vesn., 62 (2010), 23–35. doi: 0025-51651001023A.
[7]	M. K. Aouf, S. M. Madian, Inclusion and properties neighborhood for certain $p$ -valent functions associated with complex order and $q$ - $p$ -valent Cătaş operator, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 14 (2020), 1226–1232. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1812923. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1812923
[8]	M. K. Aouf, S. M. Madian, Coefficient bounds for bi-univalent classes defined by Bazilevič functions and convolution, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex., 26 (2020), 1045–1062. doi: 10.1007/s40590-020-00304-0. doi: 10.1007/s40590-020-00304-0
[9]	M. K. Aouf, S. M. Madian, Certain classes of analytic functions associated with $q$ -analogue of $p$ -valent Cătaş operator, Moroccan J. Pure Appl. Anal., 7 (2021), 430–447. doi: 10.2478/mjpaa-2021-0029. doi: 10.2478/mjpaa-2021-0029
[10]	M. K. Aouf, S. M. Madian, Subordination factor sequence results for starlike and convex classes defined by $q$ -Cătaş operator, Afr. Mat., 2021, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s13370-021-00896-4. doi: 10.1007/s13370-021-00896-4
[11]	M. K. Aouf, S. M. Madian, A. O. Mostafa, Bi-univalent properties for certain class of Bazilevič functions defined by convolution and with bounded boundary rotation, J. Egypt. Math. Soc., 27 (2019), 11. doi: 10.1186/s42787-019-0012-2. doi: 10.1186/s42787-019-0012-2
[12]	I. E. Bazilevič, On a case of integrability in quadratures of the Lowner-Kufarev equation, Mat. Sb., 37 (1955), 471–476.
[13]	M. Çaǧlar, E. Deniz, H. M. Srivastava, Second Hankel determinant for certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions, Turk. J. Math., 41 (2017), 694–706. doi: 10.3906/mat-1602-25
[14]	A. Cătaş, On certain classes of $p$ -valent functions defined by multiplier transformations, Proceedings of the international symposium on geometric function theory and applications: GFTA, 2007,241–250.
[15]	P. L. Duren, Univalent functions, New York: Springer Verlag, 1983.
[16]	P. Goswami, B. S. Alkahtani, T. Bulboaca, Estimate for initial Maclaurin coefficients of certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions, arXiv. Available from: https://arXiv.org/abs/1503.04644.
[17]	Q. Hu, H. M. Srivastava, B. Ahmad, N. Khan, M. G. Khan, W. K. Mashwani, et al., A subclass of multivalent Janowski type $q$ -starlike functions and its consequences, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1275. doi: 10.3390/sym13071275. doi: 10.3390/sym13071275
[18]	Q. H. Xu, H. G. Xiao, H. M. Srivastava, A certain general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions and associated coefficient estimate problems, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2012), 11461–11465. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.05.034. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.05.034
[19]	Q. Khan, M. Arif, M. Raza, G. Srivastava, H. Tang, S. ur Rehman, Some applications of a new integral operator in $q$ -analog for multivalent functions, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1178. doi: 10.3390/math7121178. doi: 10.3390/math7121178
[20]	B. Khan, Z. G. Liu, H. M. Srivastava, N. Khan, M. Darus, M. Tahir, A study of some families of multivalent $q$ -starlike functions involving higher-order $q$ -derivatives, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1470. doi: 10.3390/math8091470. doi: 10.3390/math8091470
[21]	B. Khan, Z. G. Liu, H. M. Srivastava, N. Khan, M. Tahir, Applications of higher-order derivatives to subclasses of multivalent $q$ -starlike functions, Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 15 (2021), 61–72.
[22]	N. Khan, M. Shafiq, M. Darus, B. Khan, Q. Z. Ahmad, Upper bound of the third Hankel determinant for a subclass of $q$ -starlike functions associated with Lemniscate of Bernoulli, J. Math. Inequal., 14 (2020), 51–63. doi: 10.7153/jmi-2020-14-05. doi: 10.7153/jmi-2020-14-05
[23]	B. Khan, H. M. Srivastava, N. Khan, M. Darus, Q. Z. Ahmad, M. Tahir, Applications of certain conic domains to a subclass of $q$ -starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 574. doi: 10.3390/sym13040574. doi: 10.3390/sym13040574
[24]	B. Khan, H. M. Srivastava, N. Khan, M. Darus, M. Tahir, Q. Z. Ahmad, Coefficient estimates for a subclass of analytic functions associated with a certain leaf-like domain, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1334. doi: 10.3390/math8081334. doi: 10.3390/math8081334
[25]	B. Khan, H. M. Srivastava, M. Tahir, M. Darus, Q. Z. Ahmad, N. Khan, Applications of a certain $q$ -integral operator to the subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions, AIMS Math., 6 (2020), 1024–1039. doi: 10.3934/math.2021061. doi: 10.3934/math.2021061
[26]	W. Ma, D. Minda, A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions, In: Z. Li, F. Ren, L. Lang, S. Zhang, Proceedings of the conference on complex analysis, International Press Inc., 1 (1994), 157–169.
[27]	N. Magesh, T. Rosy, S. Varma, Coefficient estimate problem for a new subclass of bi-univalent functions, J. Compl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 474231. doi: 10.1155/2013/474231. doi: 10.1155/2013/474231
[28]	H. Orhan, M. Kamali, Neighborhoods of a class of analytic functions with negative coefficients, Acta Math. Acad. Paedagog. Nyhazi., 21 (2005), 55–61.
[29]	H. Orhan, N. Magesh, V. K. Balaji, Certain classes of bi-univalent functions with bounded boundary variation, Tbilisi Math. J., 10 (2017), 17–27. doi: 10.1515/tmj-2017-0042. doi: 10.1515/tmj-2017-0042
[30]	H. Orhan, N. Magesh, V. K. Balaji, Initial coefficient bounds for a general class of bi-univalent functions, Filomat, 29 (2015), 1259–1267. doi: 10.2298/FIL1506259O. doi: 10.2298/FIL1506259O
[31]	K. S. Padmanabhan, R. Paravatham, Properties of a class of functions with bounded boundary rotation, Ann. Pol. Math., 31 (1976), 311–323. doi: 10.4064/ap-31-3-311-323
[32]	B. Pinchuk, Functions of bounded boundary rotation, Israel J. Math., 10 (1971), 6–16. doi: 10.1007/BF02771515. doi: 10.1007/BF02771515
[33]	S. Prema, B. S. Keerthi, Coefficient bounds for certain subclasses of analytic functions, J. Math. Anal., 4 (2013), 22–27.
[34]	M. S. Robertson, Variational formulas for several classes of analytic functions, Math. Z., 118 (1976), 311–319. doi: 10.1007/BF01109867. doi: 10.1007/BF01109867
[35]	G. S. Sălăgean, Subclasses of univalent functions, In: C. A. Cazacu, N. Boboc, M. Jurchescu, I. Suciu, Complex analysis-fifth Romanian-finnish seminar, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 1013 (1983), 362–372. doi: 10.1007/BFb0066543.
[36]	R. Singh, On Bazilevič functions, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 38 (1973), 261–271. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0311887-9. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0311887-9
[37]	H. M. Srivastava, Operators of basic (or $q$ -) calculus and fractional $q$ -calculus and their applications in geometric function theory of complex analysis, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci., 44 (2020), 327–344. doi: 10.1007/s40995-019-00815-0. doi: 10.1007/s40995-019-00815-0
[38]	H. M. Srivastava, Univalent functions, fractional calculus, and associated generalized hypergeometric functions, In: Univalent functions, fractional calculus and their applications, Halsted Press, 1989,329–354.
[39]	H. M. Srivastava, M. Arif, M. Raza, Convolution properties of meromorphically harmonic functions defined by a generalized convolution $q$ -derivative operator, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 5869–5885. doi: 10.3934/math.2021347. doi: 10.3934/math.2021347
[40]	H. M. Srivastava, D. Bansal, Coefficient estimates for a subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions, J. Egypt. Math. Soc., 23 (2015), 242–246. doi: 10.1016/j.joems.2014.04.002. doi: 10.1016/j.joems.2014.04.002
[41]	H. M. Srivastava, S. S. Eker, R. M. Ali, Coefficient estimates for a certain class of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Filomat, 29 (2015), 1839–1845. doi: 10.2298/FIL1508839S. doi: 10.2298/FIL1508839S
[42]	H. M. Srivastava, S. Gaboury, F. Ghanim, Initial coefficient estimates for some subclasses of $m$ -fold symmetric bi-univalent functions, Acta Math. Sci., 36 (2016), 863–871. doi: 10.1016/S0252-9602(16)30045-5. doi: 10.1016/S0252-9602(16)30045-5
[43]	H. M. Srivastava, S. Gaboury, F. Ghanim, Coefficient estimates for some general subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Afr. Mat., 28 (2017), 693–706. doi: 10.1007/s13370-016-0478-0. doi: 10.1007/s13370-016-0478-0
[44]	H. M. Srivastava, S. B. Joshi, S. S. Joshi, H. Pawar, Coefficient estimates for certain subclasses of meromorphically bi-univalent functions, Palest. J. Math., 5 (2016), 250–258.
[45]	H. M. Srivastava, A. K. Mishra, P. Gochhayat, Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Appl. Math. Lett., 23 (2010), 1188–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.05.009. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.05.009
[46]	H. M. Srivastava, A. O. Mostafa, M. K. Aouf, H. M. Zayed, Basic and fractional $q$ -calculus and associated Fekete-Sezgö problem for $p$ -valent $q$ -starlike functions and $p$ -valent $q$ -convex functions of complex order, Miskolc Math. Notes, 20 (2019), 489–509. doi: 10.18514/MMN.2019.2405. doi: 10.18514/MMN.2019.2405
[47]	H. M. Srivastava, M. Tahir, B. Khan, Q. Z. Ahmad, N. Khan, Some general families of $q$ -starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions, Filomat, 33 (2019), 2613–2626. doi: 10.2298/FIL1909613S. doi: 10.2298/FIL1909613S
[48]	H. M. Srivastava, M. Tahir, B. Khan, Q. Z. Ahmad, N. Khan, Some general classes of $q$ -starlike functions Aassociated with the Janowski functions, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 292. doi: 10.3390/sym11020292. doi: 10.3390/sym11020292
[49]	H. M. Srivastava, B. Khan, N. Khan, M. Tahir, S. Ahmad, N. Khan, Upper bound of the third Hankel determinant for a subclass of $q$ -starlike functions associated with the $q$ -exponential function, Bull. Sci. Math., 167 (2021), 102942. doi: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2020.102942. doi: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2020.102942
[50]	H. Tang, H. M. Srivastava, S. Sivasubramanian, P. Gurusamy, The Fekete-Szegö functional problems for some subclasses of $m$ -fold symmetric bi-univalent functions, J. Math. Ineq., 10 (2016), 1063–1092. doi: 10.7153/jmi-10-85. doi: 10.7153/jmi-10-85
[51]	D. K. Thomas, On Bazilevič functions, Am. Math. Soc., 132 (1968), 353–361.
[52]	D. K. Thomas, On the coefficients of gamma-starlike functions, J. Korean Math. Soc., 55 (2018), 175–184. doi: 10.4134/JKMS.j170105. doi: 10.4134/JKMS.j170105

1.	Jacques Demongeot, Cécile Fougère, mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines—Facts and Hypotheses on Fragmentation and Encapsulation, 2022, 11, 2076-393X, 40, 10.3390/vaccines11010040
2.	George Engelhard, Functional Approaches for Modeling Unfolding Data, 2023, 0013-1644, 001316442211434, 10.1177/00131644221143474
3.	Kayode Oshinubi, Sana S. Buhamra, Noriah M. Al-Kandari, Jules Waku, Mustapha Rachdi, Jacques Demongeot, Age Dependent Epidemic Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak in Kuwait, France, and Cameroon, 2022, 10, 2227-9032, 482, 10.3390/healthcare10030482
4.	Jong-Min Kim, Copula Dynamic Conditional Correlation and Functional Principal Component Analysis of COVID-19 Mortality in the United States, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 619, 10.3390/axioms11110619
5.	Paula Vicente, Abdul Suleman, COVID-19 in Europe: from outbreak to vaccination, 2022, 22, 1471-2458, 10.1186/s12889-022-14454-5
6.	Ibrahim M. Almanjahie, Zoulikha Kaid, Ali Laksaci, Mustapha Rachdi, Estimating the Conditional Density in Scalar-On-Function Regression Structure: k-N-N Local Linear Approach, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 902, 10.3390/math10060902
7.	Tobias Wistuba, Andreas Mayr, Christian Staerk, Estimating the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany via spline-based hierarchical modelling of death counts, 2022, 12, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-022-13723-y
8.	Antonio Glaría, Rodrigo Salas, Stéren Chabert, Pablo Roncagliolo, Alexis Arriola, Gonzalo Tapia, Matías Salinas, Herman Zepeda, Carla Taramasco, Kayode Oshinubi, Jacques Demongeot, A Step Forward to Formalize Tailored to Problem Specificity Mathematical Transforms, 2022, 8, 2297-4687, 10.3389/fams.2022.855862
9.	Adam Melnyk, Lena Kozarov, Sebastian Wachsmann-Hogiu, A deconvolution approach to modelling surges in COVID-19 cases and deaths, 2023, 13, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-023-29198-4
10.	Guido Tapia-Riera, Lenin Riera-Segura, Christian Calle-Cárdenas, Isidro R. Amaro, Saba Infante, 2022, Chapter 11, 978-3-031-18271-6, 152, 10.1007/978-3-031-18272-3_11
11.	Syazwana Aziz, Muhammad Shahimi Ariffin, Kok Beng Gan, Normurniyati Abd Shattar, 2022, Smoothing of Hip Angle Kinematics Data During Parachute Landing Using Functional Data Analysis Approach, 978-1-6654-7488-7, 34, 10.1109/SCOReD57082.2022.9973921
12.	Carey Yu-Fan Ling, Piau Phang, Siaw-Hong Liew, Vivek Jason Jayaraj, Benchawan Wiwatanapataphee, Exploration of COVID-19 data in Malaysia through mapper graph, 2024, 13, 2192-6670, 10.1007/s13721-024-00472-3
13.	Jacques Demongeot, Pierre Magal, Data-driven mathematical modeling approaches for COVID-19: A survey, 2024, 50, 15710645, 166, 10.1016/j.plrev.2024.08.004
14.	Wan Anis Farhah Wan Amir, Md Yushalify Misro, Mohd Hafiz Mohd, 2024, 3203, 0094-243X, 100004, 10.1063/5.0224405
15.	Janet O. Agbaje, Oluwatosin Babasola, Kabiru Michael Adeyemo, Abraham Baba Zhiri, Aanuoluwapo Joshua Adigun, Samuel Adefisoye Lawal, Oluwole Adegoke Nuga, Roseline Toyin Abah, Umar Muhammad Adam, Kayode Oshinubi, Modeling COVID-19 Disease with Deterministic and Data-Driven Models Using Daily Empirical Data in the United Kingdom, 2024, 4, 2673-8112, 289, 10.3390/covid4020020
16.	Jacques Demongeot, Pierre Magal, Kayode Oshinubi, Forecasting the changes between endemic and epidemic phases of a contagious disease, with the example of COVID-19, 2024, 1477-8599, 10.1093/imammb/dqae012
17.	Manuel Ribeiro, Leonardo Azevedo, André Peralta Santos, Pedro Pinto Leite, Maria João Pereira, Delfina Fernandes Hlashwayo, Understanding spatiotemporal patterns of COVID-19 incidence in Portugal: A functional data analysis from August 2020 to March 2022, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0297772, 10.1371/journal.pone.0297772
18.	Jules Waku, Kayode Oshinubi, Umar Muhammad Adam, Jacques Demongeot, Forecasting the Endemic/Epidemic Transition in COVID-19 in Some Countries: Influence of the Vaccination, 2023, 11, 2079-9721, 135, 10.3390/diseases11040135
19.	Adejimi Adeniji, Emmanuel Addai, Shatalov Michael, Kekana Malesela, Joshua Kiddy K. Asamoah, Kayode Oshinubi, Analysis of school bullying menace incorporating family education: a mathematical modeling approach, 2025, 10, 2297-4687, 10.3389/fams.2024.1502500
20.	Jacques Demongeot, Jean-Gabriel Minonzio, A signal-processing tool adapted to the periodic biphasic phenomena: the Dynalet transform, 2024, 1477-8599, 10.1093/imammb/dqae025

AIMS Mathematics

Some properties for certain class of bi-univalent functions defined by q q -Cătaş operator with bounded boundary rotation

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminary remarks on FC

3. FLFVs and its properties

3.1. Classical Shifted Legendre Polynomials (CSLPs)

3.2. Analytical expression and properties of FLFVs

3.3. Functions approximation using FLFVs

4. Operational matrices of FLFVs

4.1. The fractional integral and derivative operational matrices of FLFVs

5. Solution of multi-order FDEs

6. Test Examples

7. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog

Some properties for certain class of bi-univalent functions defined by $q$ -Cătaş operator with bounded boundary rotation