In this paper, we give some characterizations of Frenet curves in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds. We compute the Frenet equations and Frenet elements of these curves. We also obtain the curvatures of non-geodesic Frenet curves on 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds. Finally, we give some results for these curves.
Citation: Muslum Aykut Akgun. Frenet curves in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans Sasakian manifolds[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 199-211. doi: 10.3934/math.2022012
[1] | Haiming Liu, Xiawei Chen, Jianyun Guan, Peifu Zu . Lorentzian approximations for a Lorentzian $ \alpha $-Sasakian manifold and Gauss-Bonnet theorems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 501-528. doi: 10.3934/math.2023024 |
[2] | Haiming Liu, Jiajing Miao . Gauss-Bonnet theorem in Lorentzian Sasakian space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8772-8791. doi: 10.3934/math.2021509 |
[3] | B. B. Chaturvedi, Kunj Bihari Kaushik, Prabhawati Bhagat, Mohammad Nazrul Islam Khan . Characterization of solitons in a pseudo-quasi-conformally flat and pseudo- $ W_8 $ flat Lorentzian Kähler space-time manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19515-19528. doi: 10.3934/math.2024951 |
[4] | Mehmet Gülbahar . Qualar curvatures of pseudo Riemannian manifolds and pseudo Riemannian submanifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1366-1376. doi: 10.3934/math.2021085 |
[5] | Süleyman Şenyurt, Filiz Ertem Kaya, Davut Canlı . Pedal curves obtained from Frenet vector of a space curve and Smarandache curves belonging to these curves. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20136-20162. doi: 10.3934/math.2024981 |
[6] | Beyhan YILMAZ . Some curve pairs according to types of Bishop frame. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4463-4473. doi: 10.3934/math.2021264 |
[7] | Mohd Danish Siddiqi, Fatemah Mofarreh . Schur-type inequality for solitonic hypersurfaces in $ (k, \mu) $-contact metric manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36069-36081. doi: 10.3934/math.20241711 |
[8] | Aliya Naaz Siddiqui, Meraj Ali Khan, Amira Ishan . Contact CR $ \delta $-invariant: an optimal estimate for Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29220-29234. doi: 10.3934/math.20241416 |
[9] | Ayşe Yavuz, Melek Erdoǧdu . Non-lightlike Bertrand W curves: A new approach by system of differential equations for position vector. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5422-5438. doi: 10.3934/math.2020348 |
[10] | Sezai Kızıltuǧ, Tülay Erişir, Gökhan Mumcu, Yusuf Yaylı . $ C^* $-partner curves with modified adapted frame and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1345-1359. doi: 10.3934/math.2023067 |
In this paper, we give some characterizations of Frenet curves in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds. We compute the Frenet equations and Frenet elements of these curves. We also obtain the curvatures of non-geodesic Frenet curves on 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds. Finally, we give some results for these curves.
The differential geometry of curves especially in contact and para-contact manifolds studied by several authors. Olszak [16], derived certain necessary and sufficient conditions for an almost contact metric (a.c.m) structure on M to be normal and point out some of their consequences. Olszak completely characterized the local nature of normal a.c.m. structures on M by giving suitable examples. Moreover Olszak gave some restrictions on the scalar curvature in contact metric manifolds which are conformally flat or of constant ϕ-sectional curvature in [15].
Welyczko [21], generalized some of results for Legendre curves to the case of 3-dimensional normal almost contact metric manifolds, especially, quasi-Sasakian manifolds. Welyczko [20], studied the curvature and torsion of slant Frenet curves in 3-dimensional normal almost paracontact metric manifolds.
Curvature and torsion of Legendre curves in 3-dimensional (ε,δ) trans-Sasakian manifolds was obtained in [1]. Lee defined Lorentzian cross product in a three-dimensional almost contact Lorentzian manifold. Using a Lorentzian cross product, Lee proved that the ratio of κ and τ-1 is constant along a Frenet slant curve in a Sasakian Lorentzian three-manifold. Moreover, Lee proved that γ is a slant curve if and only if M is Sasakian for a contact magnetic curve γ in contact Lorentzian three-manifold M in[11]. Lee, also gave the properties of the generalized Tanaka-Webster connection in a contact Lorentzian manifold in [12].
Yıldırım [22] obtained curvatures of non-geodesic Frenet curves on 3-dimensional normal almost contact manifolds without neglecting α and β, and provided the results of their characterization.
Trans-Sasakian structure on a manifold with Lorentzian metric and conformally flat Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds was studied in [19].
Siddiki [17] studied δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds with a semi-symmetric-metric connection and computed curvature tensors, Ricci curvature tensors and scalar curvature of the δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold with a semi-symmetric-metric connection.
In this framework, the paper is organized in the following way. In section 2, we give basic definitions and propositions of a δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold. We give the Frenet-Serret equations of a curve in Lorentzian 3-manifold. In section 3, we obtain an orthonormal basis {e1,e2,e3} by using the basis (ζ′,φζ′,ξ) for the curve ζ in a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold. Also we calculate the Frenet elements of a non-geodesic Frenet curve, slant curve and Legendre curve in this manifold. Then, we give the curvatures of the curve ζ on some kinds of δ-Lorentzian manifolds. In the last section, we give some examples for the spacelike curves on a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold.
Let ˉN be a δ-almost contact metric manifold equipped with δ-almost contact metric structure (φ,ξ,η,ˉg,δ) consisting of (1, 1) tensor field φ, a vector field ξ, a 1-form η and an indefinite metric ˉg such that
φ2=U+η(U)ξ, η(ξ)=−1, | (2.1) |
φ(ξ)=0, η∘φ=0, | (2.2) |
ˉg(ξ,ξ)=−δ, | (2.3) |
η(U)=δˉg(U,ξ), | (2.4) |
ˉg(φU,φV)=ˉg(U,V)+δη(U)η(V), | (2.5) |
for all U,V∈ˉN, where δ2=1 so that δ=∓1. The above structure (φ,ξ,η,ˉg,δ) is called the δ-Lorentzian structure on ˉN. If δ=1, then the manifold becomes the usual Lorentzian structure[2] on ˉN, the vector field ξ is timelike [18].
In the classification of almost Hermitian manifolds, there appears a class W4 of Hermitian manifolds which are closely related to the conformal Kaehler manifolds [17]. The class C6⊕C5 coincides with the class of trans-Sasakian structue of type (α,β) [13]. In fact, the local nature of the two sub classes, namely C6 and C5 of trans-Sasakian structures are charactrized completely. An almost contact metric structure on ˉN is called trans-Sasakian if (ˉN×ℜ,J,G) belongs to the class W4, where J is the almost complex structure on ˉN×ℜ defined by
J(U,fddt)=(φU−fξ,η(U)ddt), | (2.6) |
for all vector fields U on ˉN and smooth functions f on ˉN×ℜ and G is the product metric on ˉN×ℜ. This may be expressed by the condition
(∇Uφ)V=α(ˉg(U,V)ξ−η(V)U)+β(ˉg(φU,V)ξ−η(V)φU), | (2.7) |
for any vector fields U and V on ˉN, ∇ denotes the Levi-Civita connection with respect to ˉg, α and β are smooth functions on ˉN [17]. The existence of condition (2.3) is ensure by the above discussion.
With the above literature, the δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds are defined as follows.
Definition 2.1. [2] A δ-Lorentzian manifold with structure (φ,ξ,η,ˉg,δ) is said to be δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α,β) if it satisfies the condition
(∇Uφ)V=α(ˉg(U,V)ξ−δη(V)U)+β(ˉg(φU,V)ξ−δη(V)φU), | (2.8) |
for any vector fields U and V on ˉN.
If δ = 1, then the δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold becomes the usual Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α,β) [17]. δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (0,0), (0,β), (α,0) are the Lorentzian cosymplectic, Lorentzian β-Kenmotsu and Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifolds respectively. In particular if α=1, β=0 and α=0, β=1, a δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold reduces to a δ-Lorentzian Sasakian manifold and a δ-Lorentzian Kenmotsu manifold respectively.
From (2.4), we have
∇Uξ=δ(−αφ(U)−β(U+η(U)ξ)), | (2.9) |
and
(∇Uη)V=αˉg(φU,V)+β[ˉg(U,V)+δη(U)η(V)]. | (2.10) |
Further for a δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold, we have
δφ(gradα)=δ(n−2)(gradβ), | (2.11) |
and
2αβ−δ(ξα)=0. | (2.12) |
Let ζ:I→ˉN be a unit speed curve in Lorentzian 3-manifold ˉN such that ˉg(ζ′,ζ′)=ε1=∓1. The constant ε1 is called the casual character of ζ. The constants ε2 and ε3 defined by ˉg(n,n)=ε2 and ˉg(b,b)=ε3 and called the second casual character and third casual character of ζ, respectively. Thus we have ε1ε2=−ε3.
A unit speed curve ζ is said to be spacelike or timelike if its casual character is 1 or -1, respectively. A unit speed curve ζ is said to be a Frenet curve if ˉg(ζ′,ζ′)≠0. A Frenet curve ζ admits an orthonormal frame field {t=ζ′,n,b} along ζ. Then the Frenet-Serret equations are given as follows
∇ζ′t=ε2κn,∇ζ′n=−ε1κt−ε3τb,∇ζ′b=ε2τn, | (2.13) |
where κ=|∇ζ′ζ′| is first curvature and τ is second curvature of ζ [11]. The vector fields t, n and b are called the tangent vector field, the principal normal vector field and the binormal vector field of ζ, respectively.
A Frenet curve ζ is a geodesic if and only if κ=0. A Frenet curve ζ with constant first curvature and zero second curvature is called a pseudo-circle. A pseudo-helix is a Frenet curve ζ whose curvatures are constant.
A curve in a Lorentzian three-manifold is said to be slant if its tangent vector field has constant angle with the Reeb vector field, i.e., η(ζ′)=−ˉg(ζ′,ξ)=constant. If η(ζ′)=−ˉg(ζ′,ξ)=0, then the curve ζ is called a Legendre curve[11].
In this section, we consider a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold ˉN. Let ζ:I→ˉN be a non-geodesic (κ≠0) Frenet curve given with the arc-parameter s and ˉ∇ be the Levi-Civita connection on ˉN. From the basis (ζ′,φζ′,ξ) we obtain an orthonormal basis {e1,e2,e3} given by
e1=ζ′,e2=φζ′√ε1+δρ2,e3=−ε1ξ+δρζ′√ε1+δρ2, | (3.1) |
where
η(ζ′)=δˉg(ζ′,ξ)=δρ. | (3.2) |
Then if we write the covariant differentiation of ζ′ as
ˉ∇ζ′e1=νe2+μe3, | (3.3) |
where ν is a certain function.
ν=ˉg(ˉ∇ζ′e1,e2). | (3.4) |
Moreover we obtain
μ=ˉg(ˉ∇ζ′e1,e3)=δρ′√ε1+δρ2−ε1δβ√ε1+δρ2, | (3.5) |
where ρ′(s)=dρ(ζ(s))ds. Then we find
ˉ∇ζ′e2=−νe1+δ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)e3, | (3.6) |
and
ˉ∇ζ′e3=−μe1−δ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)e2. | (3.7) |
The fundamental forms of the tangent vector ζ′ on the basis of the Eq (3.1) is
[ωij(ζ′)]=[0νμ−ν0δ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)−μ−δ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)0], | (3.8) |
and the Darboux vector connected to the vector ζ′ is
ω(ζ′)=δ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)e1−μe2+νe3. | (3.9) |
So we can write
ˉ∇ζ′ei=ω(ζ′)∧εiei (1≤i≤3). | (3.10) |
Furthermore, for any vector field Z=∑3i=1θiei∈χ(ˉN) strictly dependent on the curve ζ on ˉN, there exists the following equation
ˉ∇ζ′Z=ω(ζ′)∧Z+δ3∑i=1εiei[θi]ei. | (3.11) |
Let ζ:I→ˉN be a non-geodesic (κ≠0) Frenet curve given with the arc parameter s and the elements {t,n,b,κ,τ}. The Frenet elements of this curve are calculated as follows:
If we consider the Eq (3.3), then we get
ε2κn=ˉ∇ζ′e1=νe2+μe3. | (3.12) |
From the Eqs (3.5) and (3.12) we find
κ=√ν2+(δρ′√ε1+δρ2−ε1δβ√ε1+δρ2)2. | (3.13) |
On the other hand
ˉ∇ζ′n=(νε2κ)′e2+νε2κ∇ζ′e2+(με2κ)′e3+με2κ∇ζ′e3 | (3.14) |
=−ε1κt−ε3τB. | (3.15) |
By means of the Eqs (3.6) and (3.7) we obtain
−ε3τB=[(νε2κ)′−δμε2κ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)]e2+[(με2κ)′+δνε2κ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)]e3. | (3.16) |
By a direct computation we find
[(νε2κ)′]2+[(με2κ)′]2=[(νε2κ)′με2κ−νε2κ(με2κ)′]2. | (3.17) |
Taking the norm of the last equation and if we consider the Eqs (3.5) and (3.16) on (3.15) we obtain
τ=|δ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(δρ′√ε1+δρ2−ε1δβ√ε1+δρ2ε2κ)′]2|. | (3.18) |
Moreover we can write the Frenet vector fields of ζ as in the following theorem.
Theorem 3.1. Let ˉN be a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold and ζ be a Frenet curve on ˉN. The Frenet vector fields t, n and b are in the form of
t=ζ′=e1,n=νε2κe2+με2κe3,b=−1ε3τ[(νε2κ)′−δμε2κ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)]e2−1ε3τ[(με2κ)′+δνε2κ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)]e3. | (3.19) |
Moreover we have
ξ=δε1ρt+δμ√ε1+δρ2ε2κn−δ√ε1+δρ2ε3τ[(με2κ)′−δνε2κ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)]b. | (3.20) |
Let ζ be non-geodesic Frenet curve given with the arc-parameter s in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold ˉN. So we can give the following theorem.
Theorem 3.2. Let ˉN be a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold and ζ be a Frenet curve on ˉN. ζ is a slant curve (ρ=η(ζ′)=cosθ=constant) on ˉN if and only if the Frenet elements {t,n,b,κ,τ} of ζ are as follows.
t=e1=ζ′,n=e2=φζ′√ε1+δcos2θ,b=e3=−ε1ξ+δcosθζ′√ε1+δcos2θ,κ=√β2(ε1+δcos2θ)+ν2, | (3.21) |
τ=|δ(−ε1α+cosθν√ε1+δcos2θ)−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(−ε1δβ√ε1+δcos2θε2κ)′]2|. |
Proof. Let the curve ζ be a slant curve in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold ˉN. If we take into account the condition ρ=η(ζ′)=cosθ=constant in the Eqs (3.1), (3.13) and (3.17) we find (3.21). If the equations in (3.21) hold, from the definition of slant curves it is obvious that the curve ζ is a slant curve.
If we consider the Theorem (3.1), we can give the following corollaries.
Corollary 3.1. Let ˉN be a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold and ζ be a slant curve on ˉN. If the first curvature κ is non-zero constant, then ζ is a pseudo-helix with τ=|δ(−ε1α+cosθν√ε1+δcos2θ)|.
Corollary 3.2. Let ˉN be a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold and ζ be a slant curve on this manifold ˉN. If κ is not constant and τ=0, then, ζ is a plane curve and the following equation satisfies
ˉg(∇ζ′e2,e3)=ν2(βν)′√ε1+δcos2θν2+β2(ε1+δcos2θ). | (3.22) |
Theorem 3.3. Let ˉN be a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold and ζ be a spacelike Frenet curve on ˉN. ζ is a Legendre curve(ρ=η(ζ′)=0) in this manifold if and only if the Frenet elements {t,n,b,κ,τ} of ζ satisfy the following equations:
t=e1=ζ′,n=e2=φζ′,b=e3=−ξ,κ=√ν2+β2,τ=|δα+√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(βε2κ)′]2|. | (3.23) |
Proof. Let the curve ζ be a Legendre curve 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold ˉN. If we take into account the condition ρ=η(ζ′)=0 in the Eqs (3.1), (3.13) and (3.17) we find (3.23). If the equations in (3.23) hold, from the definition of Legendre curves it is obvious that the curve ζ is a Legendre curve on ˉN.
Corollary 3.3. Let the curve ζ be a Legendre curve in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold ˉN. If κ is non-zero constant and τ is equal to zero, then ζ is a plane curve and α=0.
If we consider the Eqs (3.13) and (3.17) and theorem (3.1) we can give the following corollaries.
Corollary 3.4. Let ˉN be a 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold and ζ be a Frenet curve on this manifold ˉN. The first curvature of the curve ζ is not dependent on α and β.
Corollary 3.5. From the Eqs (3.13) and (3.17) the first curvature and the second curvature of ζ on 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold ˉN are
κ=√ν2+(δρ′√ε1+δρ2)2, | (3.24) |
and
τ=|δρν√ε1+δρ2−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(δρ′ε2κ√ε1+δρ2)′]2|. | (3.25) |
i) If the curve ζ in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold ˉN is a slant curve, then we have
κ=ν and τ=|δνcosθ√ε1+δcos2θ|. | (3.26) |
ii) If the curve ζ in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold ˉN is a Legendre curve, then we have
κ=ν and τ=0. | (3.27) |
Corollary 3.6. Let ζ be a curve on 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian β-Kenmotsu manifold ˉN. Then, the first and second curvatures of ζ are
κ=√ν2+(δρ′√ε1+δρ2−ε1δβ√ε1+δρ2)2, | (3.28) |
and
τ=|δρν√ε1+δρ2−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(δρ′√ε1+δρ2−ε1δβ√ε1+δρ2ε2κ)′]2|. |
If the curve ζ is a slant curve on ˉN, then we have
κ=√ν2+β2(ε1+δcos2θ), | (3.29) |
τ=|δνcosθ√ε1+δcos2θ−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(−ε1δβ√ε1+δcos2θε2κ)′]2|. |
If the curve ζ is a Legendre curve on ˉN, then we have
κ=√ν2+ε1β2 and τ=√[(νε2κ)′]2+ε1[(βκ)′]2. | (3.30) |
Corollary 3.7. Let ζ be a curve on 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold ˉN. Then, the first curvature and the second curvature of ζ are
κ=√ν2+(δρ′√ε1+δρ2)2, | (3.31) |
and
τ=|δ(−ε1α+ρν√ε1+δρ2)−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(δρ′ε2κ√ε1+δρ2)′]2|. |
The curvatures of ζ are
κ=ν and τ=|δ(−ε1α+νcosθ√ε1+δcos2θ)|, | (3.32) |
where ζ is a slant curve in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold ˉN and
κ=ν and τ=|ε1δα|, | (3.33) |
where ζ is a Legendre curve in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold ˉN.
Corollary 3.8. From the Eqs (3.13) and (3.17) the first curvature and the second curvature of ζ on 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian Kenmotsu manifold ˉN are
κ=√ν2+(δρ′√ε1+δρ2−ε1δ√ε1+δρ2)2, | (3.34) |
and
τ=|δρν√ε1+δρ2−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(δρ′√ε1+δρ2−ε1δ√ε1+δρ2ε2κ)′]2|. |
i) If the curve ζ in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian Kenmotsu manifold ˉN is a slant curve, then we obtain
κ=√ν2+ε1+δcos2θ, | (3.35) |
τ=|δνcosθ√ε1+δcos2θ−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(−ε1δ√ε1+δcos2θε2κ)′]2|. |
ii) If the curve ζ in 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian Kenmotsu manifold ˉN is a Legendre curve, then we have
κ=√ν2+ε1 and τ=√[(νε2κ)′]2+ε1[(κ′κ)′]2. | (3.36) |
Corollary 3.9. Let ζ be a curve on 3-dimensional δ-Lorentzian Sasakian manifold ˉN. Then, the first and second curvatures of ζ are
κ=√ν2+(δρ′√ε1+δρ2)2, | (3.37) |
and
τ=|δ(−ε1+ρν√ε1+δρ2)−√[(νε2κ)′]2+[(δρ′ε2κ√ε1+δρ2)′]2|. |
If the curve ζ is a slant curve on ˉN, then we have
κ=ν and τ=|δ(−ε1+νcosθ√ε1+δcos2θ)|. | (3.38) |
If the curve ζ is a Legendre curve on ˉN, then we obtain
κ=ν and τ=|ε1δ|. | (3.39) |
Let ˉN be a 3-dimensional manifold given
ˉN={(x,y,z)∈ℜ3,z≠0}, | (4.1) |
where (x, y, z) denote the standart co-ordinates in ℜ3. Then
E1=z∂∂x, E2=z∂∂y, E3=−z∂∂z, | (4.2) |
are linearly independent of each point of ˉN [17]. Let ˉg be the Lorentzian metric tensor defined by
ˉg(E1,E1)=ˉg(E2,E2)=ˉg(E3,E3)=δ,ˉg(Ei,Ej)=0, i≠j, | (4.3) |
for i,j=1,2,3 and δ=∓1. Let η be a 1-form defined by η(Z)=δˉg(Z,E3) for any vector field Z∈Γ(TˉN). Let φ be the (1, 1)-tensor field defined by
φE1=−E2, φE2=E1, φE3=0. | (4.4) |
Then using the condition of the linearity of φ and ˉg, we obtain η(E3)=1 and
φ2Z=Z+η(Z)E3,ˉg(φZ,φW)=ˉg(Z,W)−δη(Z)η(W), | (4.5) |
for all Z,W∈Γ(TˉN).
Now, let ∇ be the Levi-Civita connection with respect to the Lorentzian metric ˉg. Then we obtain
[E1,E2]=0, [E1,E3]=δE1, [E2,E3]=δE2. | (4.6) |
The Riemannian connection ∇ with respect to the metric ˉg is given by
2ˉg(∇XY,Z)=Xˉg(Y,Z)+Yˉg(Z,X)−Zˉg(X,Y)+ˉg([X,Y],Z)−ˉg([Y,Z],X)+ˉg([Z,X],Y). | (4.7) |
If we use this equation which is known as Koszul's formula for the Lorentzian metric tensor ˉg, we can easily calculate the covariant derivations as follows:
∇E1E3=δE1, ∇E2E3=δE2, ∇E3E3=0,∇E1E2=0, ∇E2E2=−δE3, ∇E3E2=0,∇E1E1=−δE3, ∇E2E1=0 ∇E3E1=0. | (4.8) |
From the above relations, for any vector field X on ˉN, we have
∇Xξ=δ(X+η(X)ξ), | (4.9) |
for ξ=E3, α=0 and β=1. Hence the manifold ˉN under consideration is a δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian of type (0,1) manifold of dimension three.
Example 4.1. Let γ be a spacelike curve defined as
γ:I→ˉNs→γ(s)=(2lns,2,lns), |
where the curve γ parametrized by the arc length parameter t. If we differentiate γ(t) and consider (3.1) we find
dγdt=γ′(t)=2√3E1−1√3E3, |
and
e1=γ′(t), |
e2=E1, |
e3=−1√3E1+1√3E3, |
where ρ=η(γ′(t)). If we consider the Eqs (3.2), (3.3), (3.5), (3.13) and (3.17) we can write
ρ=δ1√3, μ=−2√3, ν=δ23,κ=43, τ=13. | (4.10) |
Thus, the curve γ is a spacelike helix in ˉN.
Example 4.2. Let ω be a spacelike Legendre curve defined as
ω:I→ˉNs→ω(s)=(s22,s22,1). |
where the curve ω parametrized by the arc length parameter t. If we differentiate ω(t) and using (3.1) we find
dωdt=ω′(t)=√22E1+√22E2, |
and
e1=ω′(t), |
e2=√22E1−√22E2, |
e3=−E3. |
If we consider the Eqs (3.2), (3.3), (3.5), (3.13) and (3.17) we obtain
ρ=0, μ=−δβ, ν=0,κ=2|β|, τ=|α|. | (4.11) |
The author declares that there is no competing interest.
[1] |
B. E. Acet, S. Y. Perktas, Curvature and torsion of a Legendre curve in (ε,δ) trans-Sasakian manifolds, Malaya J. Mat., 6 (2018), 140–144. doi: 10.26637/MJM0601/0018. doi: 10.26637/MJM0601/0018
![]() |
[2] | S. M. Bhati, On weakly Ricci ϕ-symmetric δ-Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl., 5 (2013), 36–43. |
[3] | D. E. Blair, Riemannian geometry of contact and symplectic manifolds, Springer Science & Business Media, 2002. |
[4] |
C. Camci, Extended cross product in a 3-dimensional almost contact metric manifold with applications to curve theory, Turk. J. Math., 36 (2012), 305–318. doi: 10.3906/mat-0910-103. doi: 10.3906/mat-0910-103
![]() |
[5] |
G. Calvaruso, Contact Lorentzian manifolds, Differ. Geom. Appl., 29 (2011), 41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2011.04.006. doi: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2011.04.006
![]() |
[6] |
G. Calvaruso, D. Perrone, Contact pseudo-metric manifolds, Differ. Geom. Appl., 28 (2010), 615–634. doi: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2010.05.006. doi: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2010.05.006
![]() |
[7] |
G. Calvaruso, Homogeneous structures on three-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds, J. Geom. Phys., 57 (2007), 1279–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2006.10.005. doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2006.10.005
![]() |
[8] |
G. Calvaruso, Einstein-like metrics on three-dimensional homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds, Geom. Dedicata, 127 (2007), 99–119. doi: 10.1007/s10711-007-9163-7. doi: 10.1007/s10711-007-9163-7
![]() |
[9] |
J. T. Cho, J. Ioguchi, J. Lee, On slant curves in Sasakian 3-manifolds, B. Aust. Math. Soc., 74 (2006), 359–367. doi: 10.1017/S0004972700040429. doi: 10.1017/S0004972700040429
![]() |
[10] | K. L. Duggal, D. H. Jin, Null curves and hypersurfaces of semi-Riemannian manifolds, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2007. |
[11] | J. Lee, Slant curves and contact magnetic curves in Sasakian Lorentzian 3-manifolds, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 784. doi: 10.3390/sym11060784. |
[12] | J. Lee, Slant curves in contact Lorentzian manifolds with CR structures, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 46. doi: 10.3390/math8010046. |
[13] |
J. C. Marrero, The local structure of trans-Sasakian manifolds, Ann. Mat. pur. Appl., 162 (1992), 77–86. doi: 10.1007/BF01760000. doi: 10.1007/BF01760000
![]() |
[14] | B. O'Neill, Semi-Riemannian Geometry with applications to relativity, Academic Press, 1983. |
[15] |
Z. Olszak, On contact metric manifolds, Tohoku Math. J., 31 (1979), 247–253. doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178229842. doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178229842
![]() |
[16] |
Z. Olszak, Normal almost contact metric manifolds of dimension three, Ann. Pol. Math., 47 (1986), 41–50. doi: 10.4064/ap-47-1-41-50. doi: 10.4064/ap-47-1-41-50
![]() |
[17] |
M. D. Siddiqi, On δ-Lorentzian trans Sasakian manifold with a semi-symmetric metric connection, Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat., 39 (2021), 113–135. doi: 10.5269/bspm.41108. doi: 10.5269/bspm.41108
![]() |
[18] |
S. Tanno, The automorphism groups of almost contact Riemannian manifolds, Tohoku Math. J., 21 (1969), 21–38. doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178243031. doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178243031
![]() |
[19] |
U. C. De, K. De, On Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ., 62 (2013), 37–51. doi: 10.1501/Commua1_0000000697. doi: 10.1501/Commua1_0000000697
![]() |
[20] |
J. Welyczko, Slant curves in 3-dimensional normal almost paracontact metric manifolds, Mediterr. J. Math., 11 (2014), 965–978. doi: 10.1007/s00009-013-0361-2. doi: 10.1007/s00009-013-0361-2
![]() |
[21] | J. Welyczko, On Legendre curves in 3-dimensional normal almost contact metric manifolds, Soochow J. Math., 33 (2007), 929–937. |
[22] | A. Yildirim, On curves in 3-dimensional normal almost contact metric manifolds, Int. J. Geom. Methods M., 18 (2021), 2150004. doi: 10.1142/S0219887821500043. |
1. | Xiawei Chen, Haiming Liu, Two Special Types of Curves in Lorentzian α-Sasakian 3-Manifolds, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1077, 10.3390/sym15051077 |