The article discusses the effect of weak and strong damping terms on decay rate for systems of nonlinear m- wave equations with new viscoelastic structures. The factors that allowed system (1.1) to coexist for a long time are the strong nonlinearities in the sources. We showed, under a novel condition on the kernel function in (2.4), a new scenario for energy decay in (3.7) by using an appropriate energy estimates. This result extend the results in [
Citation: Mohamed Biomy. Decay rate for systems of m-nonlinear wave equations with new viscoelastic structures[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5502-5517. doi: 10.3934/math.2021326
[1] | Keltoum Bouhali, Sulima Ahmed Zubair, Wiem Abedelmonem Salah Ben Khalifa, Najla ELzein AbuKaswi Osman, Khaled Zennir . A new strict decay rate for systems of longitudinal $ m $-nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 962-976. doi: 10.3934/math.2023046 |
[2] | Soh E. Mukiawa, Tijani A. Apalara, Salim A. Messaoudi . Stability rate of a thermoelastic laminated beam: Case of equal-wave speed and nonequal-wave speed of propagation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 333-361. doi: 10.3934/math.2021021 |
[3] | Qian Li . General and optimal decay rates for a viscoelastic wave equation with strong damping. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18282-18296. doi: 10.3934/math.20221006 |
[4] | Abdelbaki Choucha, Salah Boulaaras, Asma Alharbi . Global existence and asymptotic behavior for a viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation with a logarithmic nonlinearity, distributed delay and Balakrishnan-Taylor damping terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4517-4539. doi: 10.3934/math.2022252 |
[5] | Tae Gab Ha, Seyun Kim . Existence and energy decay rate of the solutions for the wave equation with a nonlinear distributed delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10513-10528. doi: 10.3934/math.2023533 |
[6] | Qian Li, Yanyuan Xing . General and optimal decay rates for a system of wave equations with damping and a coupled source term. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29404-29424. doi: 10.3934/math.20241425 |
[7] | Yousif Altayeb . New scenario of decay rate for system of three nonlinear wave equations with visco-elasticities. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7251-7265. doi: 10.3934/math.2021425 |
[8] | Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Maher Nour, Mostafa Zahri . Stabilization of a viscoelastic wave equation with boundary damping and variable exponents: Theoretical and numerical study. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15370-15401. doi: 10.3934/math.2022842 |
[9] | Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Mohammad Kafini . Asymptotic behavior of the wave equation solution with nonlinear boundary damping and source term of variable exponent-type. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30638-30654. doi: 10.3934/math.20241479 |
[10] | Hicham Saber, Fares Yazid, Fatima Siham Djeradi, Mohamed Bouye, Khaled Zennir . Decay for thermoelastic laminated beam with nonlinear delay and nonlinear structural damping. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6916-6932. doi: 10.3934/math.2024337 |
The article discusses the effect of weak and strong damping terms on decay rate for systems of nonlinear m- wave equations with new viscoelastic structures. The factors that allowed system (1.1) to coexist for a long time are the strong nonlinearities in the sources. We showed, under a novel condition on the kernel function in (2.4), a new scenario for energy decay in (3.7) by using an appropriate energy estimates. This result extend the results in [
We consider, for x∈Rn, t>0, j=1,2,…,m, the following system of m equations
{ujtt+aujt−Θ(x)Δ(uj+ωujt−∫t0ϖj(t−s)uj(s)ds)=fj(u1,u2,…,um)uj(x,0)=uj0(x)ujt(x,0)=uj1(x), | (1.1) |
where a∈R, ω>0, n≥3.
Various non-linear sources have been combined as follows, we combine all two consecutive equations together and of course the last equation with the first one, which get the whole system closely linked by the strong nonlinear sources. The functions fj(u1,u2,…,um)∈(Rm,R) are given for j=1,2,…,m−1, by
fj(u1,u2,…,um)=(p+1)[d|m∑i=1ui|(p−1)m∑i=1ui+e|uj|(p−3)/2uj|uj+1|(p+1)/2], |
and
fm(u1,u2,…,um)=(p+1)[d|m∑i=1ui|(p−1)m∑i=1ui+e|um|(p−3)/2um|u1|(p+1)/2], |
with d,e>0, p>3. For simplicity reason, we take d=e=1.
There exists a function F∈C1(R3,R) such that
m∑j=1ujfj(u1,u2,…,um)=(p+1)F(u1,u2,…,um), ∀(u1,u2,…,um)∈Rm. | (1.2) |
such that
(p+1)F(u1,u2,…,um)=|m∑j=1uj|p+1+2|m−1∑j=1ujuj+1|(p+1)/2+2|umu1|(p+1)/2. | (1.3) |
In order to use Poincare's inequality which is a key in calculus for the PDEs, we will study the problem (1.1) in the presence of a density function θ to find a generalized formula for Poincare's inequality that can be used in unbounded domain Rn. The function Θ(x)>0 for all x∈Rn is a density and (Θ)−1(x)=1/Θ(x)≡θ(x) such that
θ∈Lτ(Rn)withτ=2n2n−rn+2rfor2≤r≤2nn−2. | (1.4) |
We define a new space related to the nature of our system, taking into account the boundless of space Rn. The function spaces H is defined as the closure of C∞0(Rn), as in [20], we have
H={v∈L2nn−2(Rn)∣∇v∈L2(Rn)n}. |
with respect to the norm ‖v‖H=(v,v)1/2H for the inner product
(v,w)H=∫Rn∇v⋅∇wdx, |
and L2θ(Rn) as that to the norm ‖v‖L2θ=(v,v)1/2L2θ for
(v,w)L2θ=∫Rnθvwdx. |
For general r∈[1,+∞)
‖v‖Lrθ=(∫Rnθ|v|rdx)1r. |
is the norm of the weighted space Lrθ(Rn).
The following references in connection to our system for a single equation [6] and [7]. The work [6] was the pioneer in the literature for the single equation, source of inspiration of several works, while the work [7] is a recent generalization of [6] by introducing less dissipative effects (See [8,9,19,24,26]). With regard to the study of this type of systems without viscoelasticity, with the existence of both weak damping ut and strong damping Δut, under condition (3.2), we mention the work recently published in one equation in [14]
{utt+μut−Δu−ωΔut=uln|u|, (x,t)∈Ω×(0,∞)u(x,t)=0,x∈∂Ω,t≥0u(x,0)=u0(x),ut(x,0)=u1(x),x∈Ω, | (1.5) |
where Ω is a bounded domain of Rn, n≥1 with a smooth boundary ∂Ω. The aim goal was mainly on the local existence of weak solution by using contraction mapping principle and of course the authors showed the global existence, decay rate and infinite time blow up of the solution with certain conditions on initial energy.
In the case of non-bounded domain Rn, we mention the paper recently published by T. Miyasita and Kh. Zennir in [18], where they considered equation as follows
utt+aut−ϕ(x)Δ(u+ωut−∫t0g(t−s)u(s)ds)=u|u|p−1, | (1.6) |
with initial data
{u(x,0)=u0(x)ut(x,0)=u1(x). | (1.7) |
The authors succeeded in highlighting the existence of unique local solution and they continued to expand it to be global in time. The rate of the decay for solution was the main result, for more results related to decay rate of solution of this type of problems, please see [15,23,25,28].
Regarding the study of the coupled system of two nonlinear wave equations, we mention the work done by Baowei Feng et al. which was considered in [12], a coupled system for viscoelastic wave equations with nonlinear sources in bounded domain with smooth boundary as follows
{utt−Δu+∫t0g(t−s)Δu(s)ds+ut=f1(u,v)vtt−Δv+∫t0h(t−s)Δv(s)ds+vt=f2(u,v). | (1.8) |
Under appropriate hypotheses, they established a general decay result by multiplication techniques to extend some existing results for a single equation to the case of a coupled system.
There are several results in this direction, notably the generalization made by Shun in a complicate nonlinear case with degenerate damping term in [21]. The IBVP for a system of nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations in a bounded domain was considered in the problem
{utt−Δu+∫t0g(t−s)Δu(s)ds+(|u|k+|v|q)|ut|m−1ut=f1(u,v) vtt−Δv+∫t0h(t−s)Δv(s)ds+(|v|θ+|u|ρ)|vt|r−1vt=f2(u,v)u(x,t)=v(x,t)=0,x∈∂Ω,t>0u(x,0)=u0(x),v(x,0)=v0(x)ut(x,0)=u1(x),vt(x,0)=v1(x), | (1.9) |
where Ω is a bounded domain with a smooth boundary. Given certain conditions on the kernel functions, degenerate damping and nonlinear source terms, they got a decay rate of the energy function for some initial data.
In n−equations, paper in [1] considered a system
uitt+γuit−Δui+ui=m∑i,j=1,i≠j|uj|pj|ui|piui, i=1,2,…,m, | (1.10) |
where the absence of global solutions with positive initial energy was investigated. Next, a nonexistence of global solutions for system of three semilinear hyperbolic equations was introduced in [3]. A coupled system of semilinear hyperbolic equations was investigated by many authors and many results were obtained with the nonlinearities in the form f1=|u|p−1|v|q+1u,f2=|v|p−1|u|q+1v. (Please, see [2,16,22])
We introduce the Sobolev embedding and generalized Poincaré inequalities.
Lemma 2.1. [13,18] Let θ satisfy (1.4). For positive constants Cτ>0 and CP>0 depending only on θ and n, we have
‖v‖2nn−2≤Cτ‖v‖H, ‖v‖L2θ≤CP‖v‖H, |
and
‖v‖Lrθ≤Cr‖v‖H, Cr=Cτ‖θ‖1rτ, |
hold for v∈H. Here τ=2n/(2n−rn+2r) for 1≤r≤2n/(n−2).
In the 1950s and 1970s, the linear theory of viscoelasticity was extensively developed and now, it becomes widely used to represent this term using several improvements to the nature of decreasing the kernel function. We assume that the kernel functions ϖj∈C1(R+,R+) satisfying
1−¯ϖj=ρj>0for¯ϖj=∫+∞0ϖj(s)ds, ϖ′j(t)≤0, ϖj(0)>0. | (2.1) |
We mean by R+ the set {τ∣τ≥0}. Noting by
μ(t)=maxt≥0{ϖ1(t),ϖ2(t),…,ϖm(t)}, | (2.2) |
and
μ0(t)=mint≥0{∫t0ϖ1(s)ds,∫t0ϖ2(s)ds,…,∫t0ϖm(s)ds}. | (2.3) |
We assume that there is a function χ∈C1(R+,R+) which is linear or is strictly convex C2 function on (0,ε0),ε0≤ϖj(0), with χ(0)=χ′(0)=0 and a positive nonincreasing differentiable function ξ:[0,∞)→[0,∞), such that the novel properties
ϖ′j(t)+ξ(t)χ(ϖj(t))≤0,χ(0)=0,χ′(0)>0andχ″(ϱ)≥0, i=1,2,…,m, | (2.4) |
satisfied for any ϱ≥0.
We note that, if χ is a strictly increasing convex C2− function on (0,τ] with χ(0)=χ′(0)=0, then χ has an extension ˉχ, which is strictly increasing and strictly convex C2−function on (0,∞). For example, ˉχ can be given by
ˉχ(t)=12χ″(τ)t2+[χ′(τ)−χ″(τ)τ]t+χ(τ)−χ′(τ)τ+12χ″(τ)τ2, t>τ. |
Hölder and Young's inequalities give
‖uiuj‖(p+1)/2L(p+1)/2θ≤(‖ui‖2L(p+1)θ+‖uj‖2L(p+1)θ)(p+1)/2≤(ρi‖ui‖2H+ρj‖uj‖2H)(p+1)/2, | (2.5) |
Thanks to Minkowski's inequality to give
‖m∑j=1uj‖(p+1)L(p+1)θ≤c(m∑j=1‖uj‖2L(p+1)θ)(p+1)/2≤c(m∑j=1‖uj‖2H)(p+1)/2. |
Then, there exist η>0 such that
‖m∑j=1uj‖(p+1)L(p+1)θ+2‖m−1∑j=1ujuj+1‖(p+1)/2L(p+1)/2θ+2‖umu1‖(p+1)/2L(p+1)/2θ≤η(m∑j=1ρj‖uj‖2H)(p+1)/2. | (2.6) |
We need to define positive constants λ0 and E0 by
λ0≡η−1/(p−1)andE0=(12−1p+1)η−2/(p−1). | (2.7) |
The mainly aim of the present paper is to obtain a novel decay rate of solution from the convexity property of the function χ given in Theorem 3.4.
We denote, as in [18], an eigenpair {(λi,ei)}i∈N⊂R×H of
−Θ(x)Δei=λieix∈Rn, |
for any i∈N. Then
0<λ1≤λ2≤⋯≤λi≤⋯↑+∞, |
holds and {ei} is a complete orthonormal system in H.
Definition 2.2. The vectors (u1,u2,…,um) is said a weak solution to (1.1) on [0,T] if satisfies for x∈Rn
∫Rnujttφjdx+a∫Rnujtφjdx+∫RnΘ(x)∇(uj+ωujt−∫t0ϖj(t−s)uj(s)ds)∇φjdx=∫Rnfj(u1,u2,…,um)φjdx, | (2.8) |
for all test functions φj∈H,j=1,2,…,m for almost all t∈[0,T].
The local solution (in time [0,T]) is given in next Theorem.
Theorem 3.1. (Local existence) Assume that
1<p≤n+2n−2andn≥3. | (3.1) |
Let (u10,u20,…um0)∈Hm and (u11,u21,…,um1)∈[L2θ(Rn)]m. Under the assumptions (1.4)-(1.3) and (2.1)-(2.4), suppose that
a+λ1ω>0. | (3.2) |
Then (1.1) admits a unique local solution (u1,u2,…,um) such that
(u1,u2,…,um)∈XmT, XT≡C([0,T];H)∩C1([0,T];L2θ(Rn)), |
for sufficiently small T>0.
Remark 3.2. The constant λ1 introduced in (3.2) being the first eigenvalue of the operator −Δ.
We will show now the global solution in time established in Theorem 3.3. Let us introduce the potential energy J:Hm→R defined by
J(u1,u2,…,um)=m∑j=1(1−∫t0ϖj(s)ds)‖uj‖2H+m∑j=1(ϖj∘uj). | (3.3) |
The modified energy is defined by
E(t)=12m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+12J(u1,u2,…,um)−∫Rnθ(x)F(u1,u2,…,um)dx, | (3.4) |
here
(ϖj∘w)(t)=∫t0ϖj(t−s)‖w(t)−w(s)‖2Hds, |
for any w∈L2(Rn),j=1,2,…,m.
Theorem 3.3. (Global existence) Let (1.4)-(1.3) and (2.1)-(2.4) hold. Under (3.1), (3.2) and for sufficiently small (u10,u11),(u20,u21),…,(um0,um1)∈H×L2θ(Rn), problem (1.1) admits a unique global solution (u1,u2,…,um) such that
(u1,u2,…,um)∈Xm, X≡C([0,+∞);H)∩C1([0,+∞);L2θ(Rn)). | (3.5) |
The decay rate for solution is given in the next Theorem.
Theorem 3.4. (Decay of solution) Let (1.4)-(1.3) and (2.1)-(2.4) hold. Under conditions (3.1), (3.2) and
γ=η(2(p+1)p−1E(0))(p−1)/2<1, | (3.6) |
there exists t0>0 depending only on ϖj, a, ω, λ1 and χ′(0) such that
0≤E(t)<E(t0)exp(−∫tt0μ(s)1−μ0(t)), | (3.7) |
holds for all t≥t0.
In particular, by the positivity of μ in (2.2), we have, as in [17],
0≤E(t)<E(t0)exp(−∫tt0μ(s)ds), |
for a single wave equation.
Lemma 3.5. For (u1,u2,…,um)∈XmT, the functional E(t) associated with problem (1.1) is a decreasing energy.
Proof. For 0≤t1<t2≤T, we have
E(t2)−E(t1)=∫t2t1ddtE(t)dt=−m∑j=1∫t2t1(a‖ujt‖2L2θ+ω‖ujt‖2H+12ϖj(t)‖uj‖2H−12(ϖ′j∘uj))dt≤0, |
owing to (2.1)-(2.4).
We define an inner product as
(v,w)∗=ω∫Rn∇v⋅∇wdx+a∫Rnθvwdx, |
and the associated norm is given by
‖v‖∗=√(v,v)∗. |
∀v,w∈H. By (3.2), we get
(v,v)∗=ω∫Rn|∇v|2dx+a∫Rnθv2dx≥(ωλ1+a)∫Rnθv2dx≥0. |
The following Lemma yields.
Lemma 3.6. Let θ satisfy (1.4). Under condition (3.2), we get
√ω‖v‖H≤‖v‖∗≤√ω+C2P‖v‖H, |
for v∈H.
We give here the outline of the proof for local solution by a standard procedure (See [15,28]).
Proof. (Of Theorem 3.1.) Let (u10,u11),(u20,u21),…,(um0,um1)∈H×L2θ(Rn). The presence of the nonlinear terms in the right hand side of our problem (1.1) gives us negative values of the energy. For this purpose, for any fixed (u1,u2,…,um)∈XmT, we can obtain first, a weak solution of the related system
{zjtt+azjt−Θ(x)Δ(zj+ωzjt)+Θ(x)Δ∫t0ϖj(t−s)zj(s)ds=fj(u1,u2,…,um)zj(x,0)=uj0(x)zjt(x,0)=uj1(x). | (4.1) |
The Faedo-Galerkin's method consist to construct approximations of solutions (z1n,z2n,…,zmn,) for (4.1), then we obtain a prior estimates necessary to guarantee the convergence of approximations. In the last step we pass to the limit of the approximations by using the compactness of some embedding in the Sobolev spaces. The uniqueness is obtain by letting two solutions for (4.1) and then, after ordinary calculations, we find that the solutions are equal.
Some details regarding the transition to ODE systems are given, for this end let {ei} be the Galerkin basis and let
Wjn=span{ej1,ej2,....,ejn},j=1,…,m. |
Given initial data uj0∈H, uj1∈L2θ(Rn), we define the approximations
zjn=n∑i=1gjin(t)eji(x), | (4.2) |
which satisfy the following approximate problem
(zjntt,eji)+(azjnt,eji)−(Θ(x)Δ(zjn+ωzjnt),eji)=−(Θ(x)Δ∫t0ϖj(t−s)zjn(s)ds,eji)+(fj(u1,u2,…,um),eji), | (4.3) |
with initial conditions
zjn(x,0)=unj0(x), zjnt(x,0)=unj1(x), | (4.4) |
which satisfies
unj0→uj0,stronglyinHujn1→uj1,stronglyinL2θ(Rn). | (4.5) |
Taking eji=gji in (4.3) yields the following Cauchy problem for a ordinary differential equation with unknown gnji.
gnjitt(t)+agnjit(t)+λi(gnji(t)+ωgnjit(t))=λi∫t0ϖj(t−s)gnji(s)ds+(fj(u1,u2,…,um),gji), | (4.6) |
By using the Caratheodory Theorem for standard ordinary differential equations theory, the problem (4.3)-(4.4) has a solutions (g1in,g2in,…,gmin)i=1,n∈(H3[0,T])m and by using the embedding Hm[0,T]→Cm[0,T], we deduce that the solution (g1in,g2in,…,gmin)i=1,n∈(C2[0,T])4. In turn, this gives a unique (z1n,z2n,…,zmn) defined by (4.2) and satisfying (4.3).
To return to the problem (1.1), we should find a solution map
⊤:(u1,u2,…,um)↦(z1,z2,…,zm) |
from XmT to XmT. We are now ready to show that ⊤ is a contraction mapping in an appropriate subset of XmT for a small T>0. Hence ⊤ has a fixed point
⊤(u1,u2,…,um)=(u1,u2,…,um), |
which gives a unique solution in XmT.
We will show the global solution. For this end, by using conditions on functions ϖj, we have
E(t)≥12J(u1,u2,…,um)−∫Rnθ(x)F(u1,u2,…,um)dx≥12J(u1,u2,…,um)−1p+1‖m∑j=1uj‖(p+1)L(p+1)θ−2p+1(‖m−1∑j=1ujuj+1‖(p+1)/2L(p+1)/2θ+‖umu1‖(p+1)/2L(p+1)/2θ)≥12J(u1,u2,…,um)−ηp+1[m∑j=1ρj‖uj‖2H](p+1)/2≥12J(u1,u2,…,um)−ηp+1(J(u1,u2,…,um))(p+1)/2=G(β), | (4.7) |
here β2=J(u1,u2,…,um), for t∈[0,T), where
G(ξ)=12ξ2−ηp+1ξ(p+1). |
Noting that E0=G(λ0), given in (2.7). Then
{G(ξ)≥0in ξ∈[0,λ0]G(ξ)<0in ξ>λ0. | (4.8) |
Moreover, limξ→+∞G(ξ)→−∞. Then, we have the following Lemma
Lemma 4.1. Let 0≤E(0)<E0.
(i) If m∑j=1‖uj0‖2H<λ20, then local solution of (1.1) satisfies
J(u1,u2,…,um)<λ20, ∀t∈[0,T). |
(ii) If m∑j=1‖uj0‖2H>λ20, then, local solution of (1.1) satisfies
m∑j=1‖uj‖2H>λ21, ∀t∈[0,T),λ1>λ0. |
Proof. Since 0≤E(0)<E0=G(λ0), there exist ξ1 and ξ2 such that G(ξ1)=G(ξ2)=E(0) with 0<ξ1<λ0<ξ2.
The case (i). By (4.7), we have
G(J(u10,u20,…um0))≤E(0)=G(ξ1), |
which implies that J(u10,u20,…um0)≤ξ21. Then, we claim that J(u1,u2,…,um)≤ξ21, ∀t∈[0,T). Moreover, there exists t0∈(0,T) such that
ξ21<J(u1(t0),u2(t0),…,um(t0))<ξ22. |
Then
G(J(u1(t0),u2(t0),…,um(t0))>E(0)≥E(t0), |
by Lemma 3.5, which contradicts (4.7). Hence we have
J(u1,u2,…,um)≤ξ21<λ20, ∀t∈[0,T). |
The case (ii). We can now show that m∑j=1‖uj0‖2H≥ξ22 and that m∑j=1‖uj‖2H≥ξ22>λ20 in the same way as (i).
Proof. (Of Theorem 3.3.) Let (u10,u11),(u20,u21),…,(um0,um1)∈H×L2θ(Rn) satisfy both 0≤E(0)<E0 and m∑j=1‖uj0‖2H<λ20. By Lemma 3.5 and Lemma 4.1, we have
m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+m∑j=1ρj‖uj‖2H≤m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+m∑j=1[(1−∫t0ϖj(s)ds)‖uj‖2H+(ϖj∘uj)]≤2E(t)+2ηp+1(m∑j=1ρj‖uj‖2H)(p+1)/2≤2E(0)+2ηp+1(J(u1,u2,…,um))(p+1)/2≤2E0+2ηp+1λp+10=η−2/(p−1). | (4.9) |
This completes the proof.
Let
Λ(u1,u2,…,um)=12m∑j=1[(1−∫t0ϖj(s)ds)‖uj‖2H+(ϖj∘uj)]−∫Rnθ(x)F(u1,u2,…,um)dx, |
Π(u1,u2,…,um)=m∑j=1[(1−∫t0ϖj(s)ds)‖uj‖2H+(ϖj∘uj)]−(p+1)∫Rnθ(x)F(u1,u2,…,um)dx. |
Lemma 5.1. Let (u1,u2,…,um) be the solution of problem (1.1). If
m∑j=1‖uj0‖2H−(p+1)∫Rnθ(x)F(u1,u2,…,um)dx>0. | (5.1) |
Then, under condition (3.6), the functional Π(u1,u2,…,um)>0, ∀t>0.
Proof. By (5.1) and continuity, there exists a time t1>0 such that
Π(u1,u2,…,um)≥0,∀t<t1. |
Let
Y={(u1,u2,…,um)∣Π(u1(t0),u2(t0),…,um(t0))=0, Π(u1,u2,…,um)>0,∀t∈[0,t0)}. | (5.2) |
Then, by (5.1), we have for all (u1,u2,…,um)∈Y,
Λ(u1,u2,…,um)=p−12(p+1)m∑j=1(1−∫t0ϖj(s)ds)‖uj‖2H+p−12(p+1)m∑j=1(ϖj∘uj)+1p+1Π(u1,u2,…,um)≥p−12(p+1)m∑j=1[ρj‖uj‖2H+(ϖj∘uj)]. |
Owing to (3.4), it follows for (u1,u2,…,um)∈Y
ρj‖uj‖2H≤2(p+1)p−1Λ(u1,u2,…,um)≤2(p+1)p−1E(t)≤2(p+1)p−1E(0). | (5.3) |
By (2.6), (3.6) we have
(p+1)∫RnF(u1(t0),u2(t0),…,um(t0))≤ηm∑j=1(ρj‖uj(t0)‖2H)(p+1)/2≤η(2(p+1)p−1E(0))(p−1)/2m∑j=1ρj‖uj(t0)‖2H≤γm∑j=1ρj‖uj(t0)‖2H<m∑j=1(1−∫t00ϖj(s)ds)‖uj(t0)‖2H<m∑j=1(1−∫t00ϖj(s)ds)‖uj(t0)‖2H+m∑j=1(ϖj∘uj(t0)), | (5.4) |
hence Π(u1(t0),u2(t0),…,um(t0))>0 on Y, which contradicts the definition of Y since Π(u1(t0),u2(t0),…,um(t0))=0. Thus Π(u1,u2,…,um)>0, ∀t>0.
We are ready to prove the decay rate.
Proof. (Of Theorem 3.4.) By (2.6) and (5.3), we have for t≥0
0<m∑j=1ρj‖uj‖2H≤2(p+1)p−1E(t). | (5.5) |
Let
I(t)=μ(t)1−μ0(t), |
where μ and μ0 defined in (2.2) and (2.3).
Noting that limt→+∞μ(t)=0 by (2.1)-(2.3), we have
limt→+∞I(t)=0, I(t)>0, ∀t≥0. |
Then, we take t0>0 such that
0<I(t)<mint≥0{2(ωλ1+a),ξ(t)χ′(0)}, | (5.6) |
with (2.4) for all t>t0. Due to (3.4), we have
E(t)≤12m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+12m∑j=1(ϖj∘uj)+12m∑j=1(1−∫t0ϖj(s)ds)‖uj‖2H≤12m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+12m∑j=1(ϖj∘uj)+12(1−μ0(t))m∑j=1‖uj‖2H. |
Then, by definition of I(t), we have
I(t)E(t)≤12I(t)m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+12μ(t)m∑j=1‖uj‖2H+12I(t)m∑j=1(ϖj∘uj), | (5.7) |
and Lemma 3.5, we have for all t1,t2≥0
E(t2)−E(t1)≤−∫t2t1(am∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+ωm∑j=1‖ujt‖2H+12μ(t)m∑j=1‖uj‖2H)dt+∫t2t112m∑j=1(ϖ′j∘uj)dt |
then, by generalized Poincaré's inequalities, we get
E′(t)≤−(ωλ1+a)m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ−12μ(t)m∑j=1‖uj‖2H+12m∑j=1(ϖ′j∘uj), |
Finally, by (5.6), ∀t≥t0, we have
E′(t)+I(t)E(t)≤{12I(t)−(ωλ1+a)}m∑j=1‖ujt‖2L2θ+12m∑j=1(ϖ′j∘uj)+12I(t)m∑j=1(ϖj∘uj)≤12m∑j=1∫t0{ϖ′j(t−τ)+I(t)ϖj(t−τ)}‖uj(t)−uj(τ)‖2Hdτ≤12m∑j=1∫t0{ϖ′j(τ)+I(t)ϖj(τ)}‖uj(t)−uj(t−τ)‖2Hdτ≤12m∑j=1∫t0{−ξ(τ)χ(ϖj(τ))+ξ(τ)χ′(0)ϖj(τ)}‖uj(t)−uj(t−τ)‖2Hdτ≤0, |
by the convexity of χ and (2.4), we have
ξ(t)χ(ϱ)≥ξ(t)χ(0)+ξ(t)χ′(0)ϱ≥ξ(t)χ′(0)ϱ. |
Then
E(t)≤E(t0)exp(−∫tt0I(s)ds), |
which completes the proof.
The paper deals with a kind of m−nonlinear wave equations with viscoelastic structures. We considered the local existence, global existence and exponential decay rate of solution. We discussed the effects of weak and strong damping terms on decay rate. The methods are standard for local existence and we extended the local solution to a global one by appropriate energy estimates. At last, We obtained a novel decay rate of solution from the convexity property of the function which extends the results in [Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 43(3), 1138 (2020); Mathematics 8(2), 203 (2020)]. The treatment of Cauchy problem for a family of effectively damped single wave models with a nonlinear memory on the righthand side, that is for x∈Rn
utt+(1+t)rut−Δ(u+ωut)=∫t0(t−s)−γ‖u(s,.)‖pds | (6.1) |
where ω>0,p>1,r∈(−1,1) and γ∈(0,1), remains as an open problem, which will be our next work, based on [4,5,10,11].
The author would like to thank the anonymous referees and the handling editor for their careful reading and for relevant remarks/suggestions to improve the paper.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | A. B. Aliev, G. I. Yusifova, Nonexistence of global solutions of Cauchy problems for systems of semilinear hyperbolic equations with positive initial energy, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 211 (2017), 1–10. |
[2] |
A. B. Aliev, A. A. Kazimov, Global Solvability and Behavior of Solutions of the Cauchy Problem for a System of two Semilinear Hyperbolic Equations with Dissipation, Differ. Equations, 49 (2013), 457–467. doi: 10.1134/S001226611304006X
![]() |
[3] | A. B. Aliev, G. I. Yusifova, Nonexistence of global solutions of the Cauchy problem for the systems of three semilinear hyperbolic equations with positive initial energy, Transactions Issue Mathematics, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, 37 (2017), 11–19. |
[4] | A. Braik, A. Beniani, Kh. Zennir, Well-posedness and general decay for Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation in viscoelasticity with delay term, Ric. Mat., (2021), 1–22. |
[5] |
S. Boulaaras, A. Draifia, Kh. Zennir, General decay of nonlinear viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation with Balakrishnan‐Taylor damping and logarithmic nonlinearity, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 4795–4814. doi: 10.1002/mma.5693
![]() |
[6] |
M. M. Cavalcanti, V. N. Domingos Cavalcanti, J. Ferreira, Existence and uniform decay for a non-linear viscoelastic equation with strong damping, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 24 (2001), 1043–1053. doi: 10.1002/mma.250
![]() |
[7] |
M. M. Cavalcanti, V. N. Domingos Cavalcanti, I. Lasiecka, W. M. Claudete, Intrinsic decay rates for the energy of a nonlinear viscoelastic equation modeling the vibrations of thin rods with variable density, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 6 (2017), 121–145. doi: 10.1515/anona-2016-0027
![]() |
[8] |
E. F. Doungmo Goufo, I. Tchangou Toudjeu, Analysis of recent fractional evolution equations and applications, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 126 (2019), 337–350. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.016
![]() |
[9] |
E. F. Doungmo Goufo, Yazir Khan, Stella Mugisha, Control parameter & solutions to generalized evolution equations of stationarity, relaxation and diffusion, Results Phys., 9 (2018), 1502–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.051
![]() |
[10] | H. Dridi, Kh. Zennir, Well-posedness and energy decay for some thermoelastic systems of Timoshenko type with Kelvin-Voigt damping, SeMA Journal, (2021), 1–16. |
[11] | H. Dridi, B. Feng, Kh. Zennir, Stability of Timoshenko system coupled with thermal law of Gurtin-Pipkin affecting on shear force, Appl. Anal., (2021), 1–22. |
[12] |
B. Feng, Y. Qin, M. Zhang, General decay for a system of nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations with weak damping, Bound. Value Probl., 2012 (2012), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-1
![]() |
[13] | N. I. Karachalios, N. M. Stavrakakis, Global existence and blow-up results for some nonlinear wave equations on RN, Adv. Differ. Eq., 6 (2001), 155–174. |
[14] | W. Lian, R. Xu, Global well-posedness of nonlinear wave equation with weak and strong damping terms and logarithmic source term, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 9 (2020), 613–632. |
[15] |
G. Liu, S. Xia, Global existence and finite time blow up for a class of semilinear wave equations on RN, Comput. Math. Appl., 70 (2015), 1345–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.07.021
![]() |
[16] |
W. Liu, Global existence, asymptotic behavior and blow-up of solutions for coupled Klein–Gordon equations with damping terms, Nonlinear Anal-Theor, 73 (2010), 244–255. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.017
![]() |
[17] |
Q. Li, L. He, General decay and blow-up of solutions for a nonlinear viscoelastic wave equation with strong damping, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 1–22. doi: 10.1186/s13661-017-0918-2
![]() |
[18] |
T. Miyasita, Kh. Zennir, A sharper decay rate for a viscoelastic wave equation with power nonlinearity, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 1138–1144. doi: 10.1002/mma.5919
![]() |
[19] | S. C. Oukouomi Noutchie, E. F. Doungmo Goufo, Exact Solutions of Fragmentation Equations with General Fragmentation Rates and Separable Particles Distribution Kernels, Math. Probl. Eng., 2014 (2014), 1–5. |
[20] |
P. G. Papadopoulos, N. M. Stavrakakis, Global existence and blow-up results for an equation of Kirchhoff type on RN, Topol. Meth. Nonl. Anal., 17 (2001), 91–109. doi: 10.12775/TMNA.2001.006
![]() |
[21] |
S. T. Wu, General decay of solutions for a nonlinear system of viscoelastic wave equations with degenerate damping and source terms, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 406 (2013), 34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.04.029
![]() |
[22] |
Y. Ye, Global existence and nonexistence of solutions for coupled nonlinear wave equations with damping and source terms, B. Korean Math. Soc., 51 (2014), 1697–1710. doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2014.51.6.1697
![]() |
[23] |
Kh. Zennir, General decay of solutions for damped wave equation of Kirchhoff type with density in Rn, Annali dell'Universita'di Ferrara, 61 (2015), 381–394. doi: 10.1007/s11565-015-0223-x
![]() |
[24] | Kh. Zennir, Stabilization for solutions of plate equation with time-varying delay and weak-viscoelasticity in Rn, Russian Math., 64 (2020), 21–33. |
[25] | Kh. Zennir, M. Bayoud, S. Georgiev, Decay of solution for degenerate wave equation of Kirchhoff type in viscoelasticity, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 4 (2018), 1–18. |
[26] | Kh. Zennir, T. Miyasita, Dynamics of a coupled system for nonlinear damped wave equations with variable exponents, ZAMM Journal of applied mathematics and mechanics: Zeitschrift fur angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, (2020), e202000094. |
[27] |
Kh. Zennir, S. S. Alodhaibi, A Novel Decay Rate for a Coupled System of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Wave Equations, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 203. doi: 10.3390/math8020203
![]() |
[28] | S. Zitouni, Kh. Zennir, On the existence and decay of solution for viscoelastic wave equation with nonlinear source in weighted spaces, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 66 (2017), 337–353. |