Incidence functions | f(I) | Source |
Bi-linear | βI | [29] |
Saturated | βI1+a1I | [1,2,30] |
Beddington-Deaneries | βI1+a1S+a2I | [31,32] |
Specific nonlinear | βI1+a1S+a2I+a3SI | [33] |
Citation: Muhammad Altaf Khan, Sajjad Ullah, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan. Fractional order SEIR model with generalized incidence rate[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2843-2857. doi: 10.3934/math.2020182
[1] | Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1856-1880. doi: 10.3934/math.2020124 |
[2] | Mdi Begum Jeelani, Kamal Shah, Hussam Alrabaiah, Abeer S. Alnahdi . On a SEIR-type model of COVID-19 using piecewise and stochastic differential operators undertaking management strategies. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27268-27290. doi: 10.3934/math.20231395 |
[3] | Ishtiaq Ali, Sami Ullah Khan . Dynamics and simulations of stochastic COVID-19 epidemic model using Legendre spectral collocation method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4220-4236. doi: 10.3934/math.2023210 |
[4] | Jinji Du, Chuangliang Qin, Yuanxian Hui . Optimal control and analysis of a stochastic SEIR epidemic model with nonlinear incidence and treatment. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 33532-33550. doi: 10.3934/math.20241600 |
[5] | A. E. Matouk, Ismail Gad Ameen, Yasmeen Ahmed Gaber . Analyzing the dynamics of fractional spatio-temporal $ \mathrm{SEIR} $ epidemic model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30838-30863. doi: 10.3934/math.20241489 |
[6] | Salih Djillali, Abdon Atangana, Anwar Zeb, Choonkil Park . Mathematical analysis of a fractional-order epidemic model with nonlinear incidence function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2160-2175. doi: 10.3934/math.2022123 |
[7] | Abeer Alshareef . Quantitative analysis of a fractional order of the $ SEI_{c}\, I_{\eta} VR $ epidemic model with vaccination strategy. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6878-6903. doi: 10.3934/math.2024335 |
[8] | Kamal Shah, Muhammad Sher, Muhammad Sarwar, Thabet Abdeljawad . Analysis of a nonlinear problem involving discrete and proportional delay with application to Houseflies model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7321-7339. doi: 10.3934/math.2024355 |
[9] | Iqbal M. Batiha, Abeer A. Al-Nana, Ramzi B. Albadarneh, Adel Ouannas, Ahmad Al-Khasawneh, Shaher Momani . Fractional-order coronavirus models with vaccination strategies impacted on Saudi Arabia's infections. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12842-12858. doi: 10.3934/math.2022711 |
[10] | Rahat Zarin, Abdur Raouf, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Computational modeling of financial crime population dynamics under different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20755-20789. doi: 10.3934/math.20231058 |
Mathematical epidemiology is concern with the dynamical evolution of diseases and its control within a population. It is an important field and attracted much interest in the recent years. Mathematical models of various communicable diseases have been used as a powerful tool to explore the realistic aspects of disease spreading. In literature, numerous mathematical models have been developed in order to analyze the spread and possible control strategies of various diseases such as [1,2,3].
In epidemic models the incidence rate function plays an essential role and ensure that the model provides a reasonable qualitative analysis of the disease dynamics. In the literature of infectious disease models, a verity of incidence rate functions have been implemented. The bilinear incidence rate of the type βSI has been frequently adopted, where β indicates the per unit contact rate, S and I are respectively susceptible and infected individuals [4,5]. In [6] the authors introduced a simple epidemic model using bilinear incidence rate under the assumptions that there are no births or deaths from the infection. Later on in 1973, Capasso et al., [7] introduced the nonlinear incidence rate βSI1+αI to formulate the mathematical model of cholera epidemic in Bari. The global analysis of the SIR and SIRS models with nonlinear incidence rate have been investigated in [7,8]. In [9], the authors investigated the dynamics of SIR epidemic model with the incidence function of the form f(S,I). Recently, Gao et al. [10] formulated a more general epidemic model using f(S,I) as transmission function and explored the global dynamics of the model. Most of these models are formulated using ordinary integer-order differential equations (IDEs). In epidemiology, the previous experiences and history of an epidemic have an essential role to study its dynamics in a more realistic way. These classical models have some serious drawbacks such as they are local in nature and can not explore the dynamics of phenomena in between two integer values. Further, since the classical models do not possess the memory effects, therefore, these models can not replicate the dynamics of many real world phenomena including infectious diseases.
Fractional calculus (FC) is the generalization of classical integer-order calculus. Mathematical models with fractional-order (FO) derivative can be used to model universal phenomena with greater degree of accuracy and its applications can be found in various fields such as engineering, economics, control theory, finance and in epidemiology [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The increasing interest of using FDEs in modeling of real world complex problems is due to its various properties which are not found in IDEs. In order to overcome the aforesaid limitations of integer-order derivative, different FO operators have been introduced in existing literature [18,19,20]. A number of epidemic models using FO derivative with singular and non-singular Kernel have been proposed in the literature. Most of these models are based on either bilinear or non-linear incidence rate. Such as Saeedian et al. [21] proposed a simple SIR epidemic model with bilinear incidence function and explored the importance of memory effects and previous history on the disease dynamics. Further, they concluded that the precise information about the past events plays a key role in the disease eradication. Mouaouine et al. [22] developed a non-integer order SIR epidemic model incorporating non-linear incidence rate function.
Motivated by the previous literature in the present paper, we develop a fractional SEIR epidemic model with generalized incidence rate function of the form f(I)S. Further, we provide a detail stability analysis of both disease free and endemic equilibriums of the model and numerical simulations for various values of fractional order α. The remaining sections of the manuscript are organized as: The basic definitions and relevant results are provided in section 2. Model description and its basic properties are presented in section 3. The stability results of the model are discussed in section 4. The numerical simulations and concluding remarks are given in sections 5 and 6 respectively.
First we recall the basic definitions and some relevant results regarding the Caputo fractional derivative [18,23].
Definition 2.1. For a given function h∈Cn and t,ϑ∈R, then the FO derivative having order ϑ in Caputo sense is given by
CDϑt(h(t))=1Γ(n−ϑ)∫t0hn(χ)(t−χ)ϑ+1−ndχ, |
where n−1<ϑ<n∈N.
Definition 2.2. For a function h:R+→R, the fractional integral having order ϑ is given by
Iϑt(h(t))=1Γ(ϑ)∫t0h(χ)(t−χ)ϑ−1dχ. |
Definition 2.3. [24] For a given dynamical system with Caputo fractional operator given by
CDϑtx(t)=f(t,x(t)),ϑ∈(0,1), | (2.1) |
the constant x∗ is an equilibrium point if and only if f(t,x∗)=0.
In order to implement Lyapunov stability method for a system involving Caputo derivative, we re-call the relevant result from [24,25].
Theorem 2.4. For an equilibrium point given by x∗ for the system in Caputo sense (2.1) and Ω∈Rn be the domain such that x∗∈Ω and let G:[0,∞)×Ω→R, be a continuously differentiable function and if
V1(x)≤G(t,x(t))≤V2(x), | (2.2) |
and
CDϑtG(t,x(t))≤−V3(x), | (2.3) |
∀ ϑ∈(0,1) and x∈Ω. Where V1(x), V2(x) and V3(x) are continuously positive definite functions over Ω, then the point x of (2.1) is stable uniformly asymptotically.
To construct the propose model we divide the total population into four subclasses i.e., suspectable S(t), exposed E(t), infected I(t) and those who recovered are denoted by R(t). The suspectable population is recruited at the rate Λ. The natural death rate in all classes is denoted by d. The function Sf(I) denotes the generalized incidence rate function describing the rate at which the suspectable become infectious and join the exposed class. The exposed class become infected and enter to infected class at the rate τ. The parameter μ2 is the recovery rate of infected class whereas δ is the disease related death rate of infected class. The waning of immunity of the recovered class is denoted by the parameter θ and join the suspectable class again. The dynamics in each class is governed by a differential equation. Hence, the proposed fractional SEIR with generalized incidence rate is given by the below nonlinear system of FDEs.
{CDαtS(t)=Λ−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR,CDαtE(t)=Sf(I)−(d+τ)E,CDαtI(t)=τE−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I,CDαtR(t)=μ2I−(d+θ)R. | (3.1) |
In (3.1), CDαt denotes the Caputo derivative having order α∈(0,1] in order to describe the memory effects in the proposed epidemic model.
To make our study more effective we have assumed that f(I) is to be non-negative and continuously differentiable in the interior of R+ and further, the same hypotheses is taken in account as mentioned in [26] i.e., f(I) is a real locally Lipschitz function on the interval [0,∞) such that
ⅰ. f(0)=0 and f(I)>0 for I>0;
ⅱ. f(I)/I is continuous and monotonously non-increasing for I>0 and limI→0+f(I)I exists, denoted by β with β>0.
It is obvious from condition (ⅱ)
f(I)≤βI for I∈R+. |
Then, ∫10+1/f(u)du=1 and thus the assumption (ⅱ) in [26] is redundant. The incidence rate f(I) is dependent on the concentration of infection. Furthermore, it most famous generalized forms satisfying the above hypothesis are given in the Table 1.
Incidence functions | f(I) | Source |
Bi-linear | βI | [29] |
Saturated | βI1+a1I | [1,2,30] |
Beddington-Deaneries | βI1+a1S+a2I | [31,32] |
Specific nonlinear | βI1+a1S+a2I+a3SI | [33] |
To present the non-negativity of the system solution, let
R4+={y∈R4∣y≥0}andy(t)=(S(t),E(t),I(t),R(t))T. |
To proceeds further, we recall the generalized mean values theorem [27].
Lemma 3.1. Let suppose that h(y)∈C[a1,a2] and CDαth(y)∈(a1,a2], then
h(t)=h(a1)+1Γ(α)(CDαth)(χ)(t−a1)α, |
where a1≤χ≤t, ∀ t∈(a1,a2].
Corollary 3.2. Suppose that h(y)∈C[a1,a2] and CDαth(y)∈(a1,a2], where α∈(0,1]. Then if
(i)CDαth(y)≥0,∀y∈(a1,a2),thenh(y)isnon−decreasing. |
(ii)CDαth(y)≤0,∀y∈(a1,a2),thenh(y)isnon−increasing. |
Theorem 3.3. A unique solution y(t) of (3.1) exists with a view to remain in R4+. Furthermore, the solution is positive.
Proof. The exitance of the Caputo fractional SEIR model can be shown with the help of theorem 3.1 from [28], while the uniqueness of the solution can be easily obtained by making use of the remark 3.2 in [28] for all positive values of t. In order to explore the solution positivity, it is necessary to show that on each hyperplane bounding the non-negative orthant, the vector field points to R4+. Utilizing the aforesaid conditions on incidence function f(I), we deduced form the system (3.1)
CDαtS∣S=0=Λ+μ1I+θR≥0,CDαtE∣E=0=Sf(I)≥0,CDαtE∣I=0=τE≥0,CDαtR∣R=0=μ2I≥0. |
Hence, using the above corollary, we got the target that is, the solution will stay in R4+ and hence, the biologically feasible region is constructed as:
Φ={(S,E,I,R)∈R4+:S,E,I,R≥0}. |
Next we explore the equilibria and basic threshold quantity R0 of the model in the following subsection.
To evaluate the equilibria of the proposed model (3.1) we need to solve the following linearized system:
CDαtS=CDαtE=CDαtI=CDαtR=0. |
Thus, we have
Theorem 3.4. The fractional SEIR model (3.1) have at the most two equilibria which are:
The disease free equilibrium (DEF) given by
E0=(S0,0,0,0)=(Λd,0,0,0), |
The endemic equilibrium (EE) denoted by E1=(S∗,E∗,I∗,R∗),
where,
S∗=(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I∗τf(I∗),E∗=(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I∗τ,R∗=μ2I∗d+θ. | (3.2) |
where I∗ is a positive zero of the function H defined below
H(I)=d(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)τIf(I)+((d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)τ+dμ2(d+θ))I−Λ. | (3.3) |
Further,
limI→0+H(I)=d(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)βτ−Λ,andH(Λd)>0. | (3.4) |
Hence, H has a positive zero (and only one in this case) if and only if d(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)βτ−Λ<0 or equivalently,
Λβτd(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)>1. | (3.5) |
The expression for the most biologically important threshold parameter known as the basic reproduction number R0 obtained by the next generation approach which is given as below:
R0=Λτd(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)∂f(I0)∂I. | (3.6) |
Where, ∂f(I0)∂I is the partial derivative of incidence function f at DFE. Clearly, the EE E1, exist if R0>1.
The Jacobian matrix JE0 of the fractional model SEIR (3.1), evaluated around the DEF, E0 is as follow:
JE0=(−d0−S0∂f(I0)∂I+μ1θ0−(d+τ)S0∂f(I0)∂I00τ−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)000μ2−(d+θ)). | (4.1) |
Theorem 4.1. For any two positive integers r1 and r2 with gcd(r1,r2)=1. Let α=(r1r2) and define M=r2, then the model DEF denoted by E0 is stable locally asymptotically provided that |arg(λ)|>π2M, where λ denotes the possible roots of the characteristic equation (4.2) of the matrix JE0.
det(diag[λr1λr1λr1λr1]−JE0)=0. | (4.2) |
Proof. By expansion of (4.2), we get below equation in term of λ.
(λr1+d)(λr1+d+θ)(λ2r1+g1λr1+g2)=0, | (4.3) |
where the coefficients are given below:
g1=2d+δ+μ1+μ2+τ,g2=(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)(1−R0). |
The arguments of the roots of λp1+d1=0 are as follow:
arg(λk)=πr1+k2πr1>πM>π2M,wherek=0,1⋯,(r1−1). | (4.4) |
In similar pattern, it can be shown that argument of the roots of λp1+d2=0 are also greater than π2M. Further, if R0<1, then the desired condition (|arg(λ)|>π2M) is satisfied for all roots of polynomial (4.3). For R0>1, then with the help of Descartes rule of signs, there exits exactly one root of characteristic equation with |arg(λ)|<π2M. Thus the DEF is stable locally asymptotically if R0<1 and unstable otherwise.
Theorem 4.2. The DEF, E0, of the fractional SEIR model (3.1) is globally asymptotically stable (GAS) within the region Φ if R0<1.
Proof. To present the proof, we consider the following appropriate Lyapunov function:
L(t)=A1E(t)+A2I(t), |
where Aj, for j = 1, 2, which are positive constant to be decide later. Evaluating the time Caputo fractional derivative of L(t) we obtain
CDαtL(t)=A1CDαtE+A2CDαtI. |
Utilizing (3.1), we obtain
CDαtL(t)=A1[Sf(I)−(d+τ)E]+A2[τE−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I]≤A1[βIS0−(d+τ)E]+A2[τE−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I],f(I)≤βI=[A1βS0−A2(d+μ1+μ2+δ)]I+[A2τ−A1(d+τ)]E=A2(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I[A1βS0A2(d+μ1+μ2+δ)−1]+[A2τ−A1(d+τ)]E. |
Let the constants be A1=τ and A2=(d+τ), then simplifying, we have,
CDαtL(t)≤I(d+τ)(d+μ1+μ2+δ)(R0−1). |
It is clear that when R0<1 then CDαtL(t) is −ve, therefore, we conclude that the disease free case E0 is GAS in the region Φ.
Next, we present the global stability of the fractional order SEIR model (3.1) at the endemic case.
Theorem 4.3. If R0>1, then the EE, E1 of the system (3.1) is GAS.
Proof. Before to start the proof, at the steady state E1 of the model (3.1) we derive the following relations
Λ=dS∗+S∗f(I∗)−μ1I∗−θR∗,(d+τ)=S∗f(I∗)E∗,(d+μ1+μ2+δ)=τE∗I∗,(d+θ)=μ2I∗R∗. |
Now, we define the following Lyapunov function
V(t)=(S−S∗−S∗lnSS∗)+(E−E∗−E∗lnEE∗)+(d+τ)τ(I−I∗−I∗lnII∗)+(R−R∗−R∗lnRR∗). |
The differentiation of V(t) along with the solution of (3.1) is
CDαtV(t)=(1−S∗S)CDαtS(t)+(1−E∗E)CDαtE(t)+(d+τ)τ(1−I∗I)CDαtI(t)+(1−R∗R)CDαtR(t). |
By direct calculations, we have that:
CDαtV(t)=(1−S∗S)[Λ−dS−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR]+(1−E∗E)[Sf(I)−(d+τ)E]+(d+τ)τ(1−I∗I)[τE−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I]+(1−R∗R)[μ2I−(d+θ)R]. |
(1−S∗S)CDαtS(t)=(1−S∗S)[Λ−dS−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR]=(1−S∗S)[dS∗+S∗f(I∗)−μ1I∗−θR∗−DES−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR]=dS∗(2−SS∗−S∗S)+μ1I∗(II∗−1−S∗ISI∗+S∗S)+θR∗(RR∗−1−S∗RSR∗+S∗S)+S∗f(I∗)(1−Sf(I)S∗f(I∗)−S∗S+f(I)f(I∗)). | (4.5) |
(1−E∗E)CDαtE(t)=(1−E∗E)[Sf(I)−(d+τ)E]=(1−E∗E)[Sf(I)−S∗f(I∗)EE∗]=S∗f(I∗)(Sf(I)S∗f(I∗)−EE∗−E∗Sf(I)ES∗f(I∗)+1). | (4.6) |
(d+τ)τ(1−I∗I)CDαtI(t)=(d+τ)τ(1−I∗I)[τE−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I]=(1−I∗I)(d+τ)τ[τE−τE∗II∗]=S∗f(I∗)(EE∗−II∗−EI∗E∗I+1). | (4.7) |
(1−R∗R)CDαtR(t)=(1−R∗R)(μ2I−(d+θ)R)=(1−R∗R)(μ2I−μ2I∗R∗R)=μ2I∗(II∗−RR∗−R∗IRI∗+1). | (4.8) |
After some arrangement we have
CDαtV(t)=dS∗(2−SS∗−S∗S)+μ1I∗(II∗−1−S∗S(II∗−1))+θR∗(RR∗−1−S∗S(RR∗−1))+μ2I∗(1−RR∗−II∗(R∗R−1))+S∗f(I∗)(3−S∗S−II∗−EI∗E∗I−f(I)f(I∗)(E∗SES∗−1)). |
It follows from the property arithmetic mean and we have
(2−SS∗−S∗S)≤0, |
and if
(II∗−1−S∗S(II∗−1))≤0,(RR∗−1−S∗S(RR∗−1))≤0,(1−RR∗−II∗(R∗R−1))≤0,(3−S∗S−II∗−EI∗E∗I−f(I)g(I∗)(E∗SES∗−1))≤0, |
then, by Lyapunov stability theorem, it ensures that the model is GAS at E1 when R0>1.
To obtain the numerical solution of the fractional SEIR model (3.1), we take the general incidence function particularly as bilinear f(I)=βI and saturated i.e., f(I)=βI1+α1I. The numerical values of the parameters are Λ=0.8 β=0.00004, α1=0.1, d=0.001, μ1=0.02, θ=0.02, τ=0.02, μ2=0.02, and δ=0.004. For the numerical solution of fractional order model (3.1), we use the predictor corrector method. The time level considered in the numerical simulations of the model is 400 days. We present the obtained results in the form of graphics as well as Tables. For the Tables 2 and 3, we use the step size h=0.1 while for the graphical results we considered h=0.05. The graphical results of bilinear case are depicted in 1 and 2. We considered β=0.004 on which the reproduction number R0=67.7249>1 which shows that the population is highly endemic and present the graphical results in Figure 1. Further, we obtain Figure 2, in which we considered β=0.00004 on which R0=0.67721<1. In Figure 1 and 2 we used the order of the fractional parameter α=1,0.95,0.9,0.85. In Figure 1, the subetaaphs show, the population of susceptible, exposed, infected and recovered individuals. By decreasing the value of α, the population of exposed, infected and recovered individuals decreases efficiently while the population of susceptible increases. For such a high endemic case the population of infected compartments and their decrease at fractional order parameter is very important. To make such model with the realistic data could be useful for the data fitting. The sub-graphs in Figure 2 shows that decreasing the fractional order parameter α=1,0.95,0.9,0.85, we can see that the population of infected compartments are increases while the population of susceptible and recovered individuals decreases. The graphical interpretations of the model (3.1) with nonlinear saturated incidence rate are presented in Figures 3 and 4 for R0>1 and R0<1 respectively. Furthermore, for the saturated incidence rate we considered the fractional order parameter α=1,0.95,0.9,0.85 and give the Tables 2 and 3, where each variable for the step-size h=0.1 their values are presented.
t | S, α=1 | S, α=0.95 | S, α=0.90 | S, α=0.85 | E, α=1 | E,α=0.95 | E,α=0.90 | E,α=0.850 |
0.0 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 |
0.1 | 99.8898 | 99.8738 | 99.8557 | 99.8353 | 60.0742 | 60.0850 | 60.0972 | 60.1110 |
0.2 | 99.7794 | 99.7558 | 99.7303 | 99.7025 | 60.1487 | 60.1646 | 60.1819 | 60.2007 |
0.3 | 99.6686 | 99.6406 | 99.6108 | 99.5793 | 60.2236 | 60.2426 | 60.2628 | 60.2842 |
0.4 | 99.5575 | 99.5269 | 99.4950 | 99.4619 | 60.2989 | 60.3197 | 60.3414 | 60.3640 |
0.5 | 99.4461 | 99.4144 | 99.3818 | 99.3485 | 60.3745 | 60.3961 | 60.4184 | 60.4411 |
0.6 | 99.3344 | 99.3026 | 99.2705 | 99.2382 | 60.4504 | 60.4721 | 60.4942 | 60.5164 |
0.7 | 99.2225 | 99.1916 | 99.1608 | 99.1303 | 60.5266 | 60.5478 | 60.5690 | 60.5900 |
0.8 | 99.1103 | 99.0810 | 99.0524 | 99.0245 | 60.6031 | 60.6233 | 60.6431 | 60.6624 |
0.9 | 98.9978 | 98.9709 | 98.9451 | 98.9204 | 60.6799 | 60.6986 | 60.7166 | 60.7338 |
1.0 | 98.8851 | 98.8612 | 98.8387 | 98.8178 | 60.7570 | 60.7737 | 60.7895 | 60.8042 |
t | I, α=1 | I, α=0.95 | I, α=0.90 | I, α=0.85 | R, α=1 | R,α=0.95 | R,α=0.90 | R,α=0.850 |
0.0 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.1 | 10.0749 | 10.0858 | 10.0980 | 10.1118 | 0.0201 | 0.0230 | 0.0263 | 0.0300 |
0.2 | 10.1496 | 10.1654 | 10.1826 | 10.2012 | 0.0402 | 0.0445 | 0.0492 | 0.0543 |
0.3 | 10.2242 | 10.2428 | 10.2626 | 10.2835 | 0.0605 | 0.0656 | 0.0711 | 0.0769 |
0.4 | 10.2985 | 10.3187 | 10.3397 | 10.3615 | 0.0809 | 0.0865 | 0.0924 | 0.0985 |
0.5 | 10.3727 | 10.3935 | 10.4147 | 10.4363 | 0.1013 | 0.1072 | 0.1133 | 0.1195 |
0.6 | 10.4466 | 10.4673 | 10.4880 | 10.5088 | 0.1219 | 0.1278 | 0.1338 | 0.1399 |
0.7 | 10.5204 | 10.5403 | 10.5599 | 10.5792 | 0.1426 | 0.1484 | 0.1542 | 0.1599 |
0.8 | 10.5941 | 10.6126 | 10.6306 | 10.6480 | 0.1634 | 0.1689 | 0.1743 | 0.1796 |
0.9 | 10.6675 | 10.6842 | 10.7002 | 10.7153 | 0.1843 | 0.1894 | 0.1944 | 0.1991 |
1.0 | 10.7408 | 10.7553 | 10.7689 | 10.7813 | 0.2053 | 0.2099 | 0.2142 | 0.2183 |
The present work investigate the dynamics of a fractional SEIR epidemic model with generalized incidence rate. We presented the fractional SEIR model in Caputo sense and explored its basic mathematical results. The stability results of the disease free and endemic equilibriums are investigated. The fractional model at the disease free case is locally as well as globally asymptotically stable when R0<1. Further, we presented the global stability of the fractional order model at the endemic case when R0>1 by using the extended Lyapunov function theory. Then, the numerical results via Tables and graphically are obtained for the fractional order model when the basic reproduction number less or greater than unity. To obtained the model simulations we particularly considered the most widely used bilinear and situated incidence rates. The graphical result for the high endemic value of the fractional order parameter α, suggest that the at high endemic case the infected compartments are decreases well by decreasing the fractional order parameter α. From the graphical results we concluded that the saturated incidence rate is more appropriate and biologically feasible than the bilinear case. Further, we concluded that the fractional order model is the generalization of integer order model and it gives useful information at each instant of time of interest. In future we will study the dynamics of the present model using Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives.
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | M. A. Khan, Q. Badshah, S. Islam, et al. Global dynamics of SEIRS epidemic model with non-linear generalized incidences and preventive vaccination, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2015 (2015), 88. |
[2] |
S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, and J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, Mathematical formulation of hepatitis B virus with optimal control analysis, Optim. Cont. Appl. Meth., 40 (2019), 1-17. doi: 10.1002/oca.2459
![]() |
[3] |
F. B. Agusto and M. A. Khan, Optimal control strategies for dengue transmission in Pakistan, Math. Biosci., 305 (2018), 102-121. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.09.007
![]() |
[4] | M. A. Khan, K. Shah, Y. Khan, et al. Mathematical modeling approach to the transmission dynamics of pine wilt disease with saturated incidence rate, Int. J. Biomath., 11 (2018), 1850035. |
[5] |
F. Rao, P. S. Mandal and Y. Kang, Complicated endemics of an SIRS model with a generalized incidence under preventive vaccination and treatment controls, Appl. Math. Model., 67 (2019), 38-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.10.016
![]() |
[6] |
W. O. Kermack, A. G. MCKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 115 (1927), 700-721. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
![]() |
[7] | V. Capasso and G. Serio, A generalization of the Kermack-Mckendrick deterministic epidemic model, Math. Biosci., 42 (1978), 41-61. |
[8] |
A. Korobeinikov and P. K. Maini, A Lyapunov function and global properties for SIR and SEIR epidemiological models with nonlinear incidence, Math. Biosci. Eng., 1 (2004), 57-60. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.57
![]() |
[9] |
A. Denes, G. Rost, Global stability for SIR and SIRS models with nonlinear incidence and removal terms via dulac functions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 21 (2016), 1101-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.1101
![]() |
[10] | D. P. Gao, N. J. Huang, S. M. Kang, et al. Global stability analysis of an SVEIR epidemic model with general incidence rate, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 42. |
[11] | D. P. Ahokpossi, A. Atangana and D. P. Vermeulen, Modelling groundwater fractal flow with fractional differentiation via Mittag-Leffler law, Eur. Phy. J. Plus, 132 (2017), 165. |
[12] |
S. Ullah, M. A. Khan and M. Farooq, A fractional model for the dynamics of TB virus, Cha. Solit. Frac., 116 (2018), 63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.001
![]() |
[13] |
M. A. Khan, Y. Khan and S. Islam, Complex dynamics of an SEIR epidemic model with saturated incidence rate and treatment, Phy. A, 493 (2018), 210-227. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.10.038
![]() |
[14] |
Y. Khan, N. Faraz, A. Yildirim, et al. Fractional variational iteration method for fractional initialboundary value problems arising in the application of nonlinear science, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 2273-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.07.014
![]() |
[15] |
Y. Khan, Q. Wu, N. Faraz, et al. A new fractional analytical approach via a modified RiemannLiouville derivative, Appl. Math. Lett., 25 (2012), 1340-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.11.041
![]() |
[16] | Y. Khan, N. Faraz, S. KUMARA, et al. A coupling method of homotopy perturbation and Laplace transformation for fractional models, U.P.B. Sci. Bull. Series A, 74 (2012), 57-68. |
[17] | Y. X. Jun, D. Baleanu, Y. Khan, et al. Local Fractional Variational Iteration Method for Diffusion and Wave Equations on Cantor Sets, Rom. J. Phys., 59 (2014), 36-48. |
[18] | I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, California, USA, 1999. |
[19] | M. Caputo and M. Fabrizio, A New Definition of Fractional Derivative without Singular Kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73-85. |
[20] |
A. Atangana and D. Baleanu, New Fractional Derivatives with Nonlocal and Non-Singular Kernel: Theory and Application to Heat Transfer Model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763-769. doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
![]() |
[21] | M. Saeedian, M. Khalighi, N. Azimi-Tafreshi, et al. Memory effects on epidemic evolution: The susceptible-infected-recovered epidemic model, Phy. Rev. E, 95 (2017), 022409. |
[22] |
A. Mouaouine, A. Boukhouima, K. Hattaf, et al. A fractional order SIR epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate, Adv. Diff. Eq., 2018 (2018), 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s13662-017-1452-3
![]() |
[23] | S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas and O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives: theory and applications, CRC, 1993. |
[24] |
H. Delavari, D. Baleanu and J. Sadati, Stability analysis of Caputo fractional-order nonlinear systems revisited, Nonlinear Dyn., 67 (2012), 2433-2439. doi: 10.1007/s11071-011-0157-5
![]() |
[25] |
C. V. D. Leon, Volterra-type Lyapunov functions for fractional-order epidemic systems, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 24 (2015), 75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013
![]() |
[26] |
J. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Xiao, et al. A class of Lyapunov functions and the global stability of some epidemic models with nonlinear incidence, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 6 (2016), 38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.01.044
![]() |
[27] | Z. M. Odibat and N. T. Shawagfeh, Generalized Taylors formula, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 286-293. |
[28] |
W. Lin, Global existence theory and chaos control of fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 332 (2007), 709-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.10.040
![]() |
[29] |
J. J. Wang, J. Z. Zhang and Z. Jin, Analysis of an SIR model with bilinear incidence rate, Nonlinear Anal-Real, 11 (2010), 2390-2402. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.07.012
![]() |
[30] |
X. Liu and L. Yang, Stability analysis of an SEIQV epidemic model with saturated incidence rate, Nonlinear Anal-Real, 13 (2012), 2671-2679. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.03.010
![]() |
[31] |
J. R. Beddington, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, J. Animal Ecol., 44 (1975), 331-341. doi: 10.2307/3866
![]() |
[32] |
D. L. DeAngelis, R. A. Goldstein and R. V. ONeill, A model for tropic interaction, Ecology, 56 (1975), 881-892. doi: 10.2307/1936298
![]() |
[33] |
K. Hattaf, M. Mahrouf, J. Adnani, et al. Qualitative analysis of a stochastic epidemic model with specific functional response cand temporary immunity, Phys. A, 490 (2018), 591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.043
![]() |
1. | Mahmoud Moustafa, Mohd Hafiz Mohd, Ahmad Izani Ismail, Farah Aini Abdullah, Dynamical analysis of a fractional order eco-epidemiological model with nonlinear incidence rate and prey refuge, 2021, 65, 1598-5865, 623, 10.1007/s12190-020-01408-6 | |
2. | Aadil Lahrouz, Riane Hajjami, Mustapha El Jarroudi, Adel Settati, Mittag-Leffler stability and bifurcation of a nonlinear fractional model with relapse, 2021, 386, 03770427, 113247, 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113247 | |
3. | Sunil Kumar, Ranbir Kumar, M. S. Osman, Bessem Samet, A wavelet based numerical scheme for fractional order SEIR epidemic of measles by using Genocchi polynomials , 2021, 37, 0749-159X, 1250, 10.1002/num.22577 | |
4. | Fehaid Salem Alshammari, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Dynamic behaviors of a modified SIR model with nonlinear incidence and recovery rates, 2021, 60, 11100168, 2997, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.023 | |
5. | Sandeep Sharma, Fateh Singh, Backward bifurcation in a cholera model with a general treatment function, 2021, 3, 2523-3963, 10.1007/s42452-021-04189-0 | |
6. | Yanmei Wang, Guirong Liu, Stability of a Nonlinear Stochastic Epidemic Model with Transfer from Infectious to Susceptible, 2020, 2020, 1076-2787, 1, 10.1155/2020/9614670 | |
7. | Zeliha Korpinar, Fairouz Tchier, Mustafa Inc, Fatiha Bousbahi, Ferdous M.O. Tawfiq, Mehmet Ali Akinlar, Applicability of time conformable derivative to Wick-fractional-stochastic PDEs, 2020, 59, 11100168, 1485, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.05.001 | |
8. | Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani, Dumitru Baleanu, Jayakumar Thippan, Vinoth Sivakumar, On stiff, fuzzy IRD-14 day average transmission model of COVID-19 pandemic disease, 2020, 7, 2375-1495, 208, 10.3934/bioeng.2020018 | |
9. | Hassan Aghdaoui, Abdesslem Lamrani Alaoui, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Mouhcine Tilioua, On analysis and optimal control of a SEIRI epidemic model with general incidence rate, 2021, 20, 22113797, 103681, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103681 | |
10. | Muntaser Safan, Impact of reduction in contact time activity of infected individuals on the dynamics and control of directly transmitted respiratory infections in SIR models, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02708-8 | |
11. | Shahram Rezapour, Hakimeh Mohammadi, A study on the AH1N1/09 influenza transmission model with the fractional Caputo–Fabrizio derivative, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02945-x | |
12. | Malen Etxeberria-Etxaniz, Santiago Alonso-Quesada, Manuel De la Sen, On an SEIR Epidemic Model with Vaccination of Newborns and Periodic Impulsive Vaccination with Eventual On-Line Adapted Vaccination Strategies to the Varying Levels of the Susceptible Subpopulation, 2020, 10, 2076-3417, 8296, 10.3390/app10228296 | |
13. | Mahmoud Moustafa, Farah Aini Abdullah, Sharidan Shafie, Zuhaila Ismail, Dynamical behavior of a fractional-order Hantavirus infection model incorporating harvesting, 2022, 61, 11100168, 11301, 10.1016/j.aej.2022.05.004 | |
14. | Brice M. Yambiyo, Fatemeh Norouzi, Gaston M. N’Guérékata, 2021, Chapter 4, 978-3-030-77703-6, 51, 10.1007/978-3-030-77704-3_4 | |
15. | Xiao-Hong Zhang, Aatif Ali, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Mohammad Y. Alshahrani, Taseer Muhammad, Saeed Islam, Juan Luis García Guirao, Mathematical Analysis of the TB Model with Treatment via Caputo-Type Fractional Derivative, 2021, 2021, 1607-887X, 1, 10.1155/2021/9512371 | |
16. | Anil Kumar Rajak, , A Fractional-Order Epidemic Model with Quarantine Class and Nonmonotonic Incidence: Modeling and Simulations, 2022, 46, 1028-6276, 1249, 10.1007/s40995-022-01339-w | |
17. | Ardak Kashkynbayev, Fathalla A. Rihan, Dynamics of Fractional-Order Epidemic Models with General Nonlinear Incidence Rate and Time-Delay, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 1829, 10.3390/math9151829 | |
18. | Abhishek Kumar, Stability of a Fractional-Order Epidemic Model with Nonlinear Incidences and Treatment Rates, 2020, 44, 1028-6276, 1505, 10.1007/s40995-020-00960-x | |
19. | Lylia Salah Derradji, Nacira Hamidane, Sofiane Aouchal, A fractional SEIRS model with disease resistance and nonlinear generalized incidence rate in Caputo–Fabrizio sense, 2023, 72, 0009-725X, 81, 10.1007/s12215-021-00659-x | |
20. | Ricardo Almeida, Natália Martins, Cristiana J. Silva, Global Stability Condition for the Disease-Free Equilibrium Point of Fractional Epidemiological Models, 2021, 10, 2075-1680, 238, 10.3390/axioms10040238 | |
21. | Maheswari Rangasamy, Nazek Alessa, Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani, Karuppusamy Loganathan, Dynamics of a Novel IVRD Pandemic Model of a Large Population over a Long Time with Efficient Numerical Methods, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1919, 10.3390/sym14091919 | |
22. | Shahram Rezapour, Hakimeh Mohammadi, 2022, 9780323905046, 211, 10.1016/B978-0-32-390504-6.00017-6 | |
23. | Kunquan Lan, Linear first order Riemann-Liouville fractional differential and perturbed Abel's integral equations, 2022, 306, 00220396, 28, 10.1016/j.jde.2021.10.025 | |
24. | F. Talay Akyildiz, Fehaid Salem Alshammari, Complex mathematical SIR model for spreading of COVID-19 virus with Mittag-Leffler kernel, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-021-03470-1 | |
25. | Sami Aljhani, Mohd Salmi Md Noorani, Khaled M. Saad, A. K. Alomari, Dumitru Vieru, Numerical Solutions of Certain New Models of the Time-Fractional Gray-Scott, 2021, 2021, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2021/2544688 | |
26. | Pegah Taghiei Karaji, Nemat Nyamoradi, Bashir Ahmad, Stability and bifurcations of an SIR model with a nonlinear incidence rate, 2023, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.9155 | |
27. | Jiaying Zhou, Yi Zhao, Yong Ye, Complex dynamics and control strategies of SEIR heterogeneous network model with saturated treatment, 2022, 608, 03784371, 128287, 10.1016/j.physa.2022.128287 | |
28. | Somayeh Fouladi, Mohammad Kohandel, Brydon Eastman, A comparison and calibration of integer and fractional-order models of COVID-19 with stratified public response, 2022, 19, 1551-0018, 12792, 10.3934/mbe.2022597 | |
29. | Muhammad Farhan, Fahad Aljuaydi, Zahir Shah, Ebraheem Alzahrani, Ebenezer Bonyah, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach to a new Hepatitis B model in light of asymptomatic carriers, vaccination and treatment, 2024, 24, 24682276, e02127, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02127 | |
30. | Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach of Buruli ulcer in Possum mammals, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 065219, 10.1088/1402-4896/acd27d | |
31. | A. Ben Lahbib, L. Azrar, Time delay and nonlinear incidence effects on the stochastic SIRC epidemic model, 2024, 11, 23129794, 84, 10.23939/mmc2024.01.084 | |
32. | Abhishek Kumar, Kanica Goel, Modeling and analysis of a fractional-order nonlinear epidemic model incorporating the compartments of infodemic and aware populations, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 095224, 10.1088/1402-4896/aceb3f | |
33. | Kalpana Umapathy, Balaganesan Palanivelu, Víctor Leiva, Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani, Cecilia Castro, On Fuzzy and Crisp Solutions of a Novel Fractional Pandemic Model, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 528, 10.3390/fractalfract7070528 | |
34. | Derya AVCI, Optimal Control for A SEIR Epidemiological Model Under the Effect of Different Incidence Rates, 2023, 11, 2148-2446, 699, 10.29130/dubited.1076222 | |
35. | S. Sankaranarayanan, An approach to statistical analysis-using the average transmission model of Covid 19, 2020, 8, 23193786, 2158, 10.26637/MJM0804/0141 | |
36. | Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Zhi Ling, A fractional modeling approach for the transmission dynamics of measles with double-dose vaccination, 2023, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2023.2297171 | |
37. | Kuldeep Malik, Saad Althobaiti, Impact of the infected population and nonlinear incidence rate on the dynamics of the $SIR$ model, 2025, 2025, 2731-4235, 10.1186/s13662-025-03897-w |
t | S, α=1 | S, α=0.95 | S, α=0.90 | S, α=0.85 | E, α=1 | E,α=0.95 | E,α=0.90 | E,α=0.850 |
0.0 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 |
0.1 | 99.8898 | 99.8738 | 99.8557 | 99.8353 | 60.0742 | 60.0850 | 60.0972 | 60.1110 |
0.2 | 99.7794 | 99.7558 | 99.7303 | 99.7025 | 60.1487 | 60.1646 | 60.1819 | 60.2007 |
0.3 | 99.6686 | 99.6406 | 99.6108 | 99.5793 | 60.2236 | 60.2426 | 60.2628 | 60.2842 |
0.4 | 99.5575 | 99.5269 | 99.4950 | 99.4619 | 60.2989 | 60.3197 | 60.3414 | 60.3640 |
0.5 | 99.4461 | 99.4144 | 99.3818 | 99.3485 | 60.3745 | 60.3961 | 60.4184 | 60.4411 |
0.6 | 99.3344 | 99.3026 | 99.2705 | 99.2382 | 60.4504 | 60.4721 | 60.4942 | 60.5164 |
0.7 | 99.2225 | 99.1916 | 99.1608 | 99.1303 | 60.5266 | 60.5478 | 60.5690 | 60.5900 |
0.8 | 99.1103 | 99.0810 | 99.0524 | 99.0245 | 60.6031 | 60.6233 | 60.6431 | 60.6624 |
0.9 | 98.9978 | 98.9709 | 98.9451 | 98.9204 | 60.6799 | 60.6986 | 60.7166 | 60.7338 |
1.0 | 98.8851 | 98.8612 | 98.8387 | 98.8178 | 60.7570 | 60.7737 | 60.7895 | 60.8042 |
t | I, α=1 | I, α=0.95 | I, α=0.90 | I, α=0.85 | R, α=1 | R,α=0.95 | R,α=0.90 | R,α=0.850 |
0.0 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.1 | 10.0749 | 10.0858 | 10.0980 | 10.1118 | 0.0201 | 0.0230 | 0.0263 | 0.0300 |
0.2 | 10.1496 | 10.1654 | 10.1826 | 10.2012 | 0.0402 | 0.0445 | 0.0492 | 0.0543 |
0.3 | 10.2242 | 10.2428 | 10.2626 | 10.2835 | 0.0605 | 0.0656 | 0.0711 | 0.0769 |
0.4 | 10.2985 | 10.3187 | 10.3397 | 10.3615 | 0.0809 | 0.0865 | 0.0924 | 0.0985 |
0.5 | 10.3727 | 10.3935 | 10.4147 | 10.4363 | 0.1013 | 0.1072 | 0.1133 | 0.1195 |
0.6 | 10.4466 | 10.4673 | 10.4880 | 10.5088 | 0.1219 | 0.1278 | 0.1338 | 0.1399 |
0.7 | 10.5204 | 10.5403 | 10.5599 | 10.5792 | 0.1426 | 0.1484 | 0.1542 | 0.1599 |
0.8 | 10.5941 | 10.6126 | 10.6306 | 10.6480 | 0.1634 | 0.1689 | 0.1743 | 0.1796 |
0.9 | 10.6675 | 10.6842 | 10.7002 | 10.7153 | 0.1843 | 0.1894 | 0.1944 | 0.1991 |
1.0 | 10.7408 | 10.7553 | 10.7689 | 10.7813 | 0.2053 | 0.2099 | 0.2142 | 0.2183 |
Incidence functions | f(I) | Source |
Bi-linear | βI | [29] |
Saturated | βI1+a1I | [1,2,30] |
Beddington-Deaneries | βI1+a1S+a2I | [31,32] |
Specific nonlinear | βI1+a1S+a2I+a3SI | [33] |
t | S, α=1 | S, α=0.95 | S, α=0.90 | S, α=0.85 | E, α=1 | E,α=0.95 | E,α=0.90 | E,α=0.850 |
0.0 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 100.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 | 60.0000 |
0.1 | 99.8898 | 99.8738 | 99.8557 | 99.8353 | 60.0742 | 60.0850 | 60.0972 | 60.1110 |
0.2 | 99.7794 | 99.7558 | 99.7303 | 99.7025 | 60.1487 | 60.1646 | 60.1819 | 60.2007 |
0.3 | 99.6686 | 99.6406 | 99.6108 | 99.5793 | 60.2236 | 60.2426 | 60.2628 | 60.2842 |
0.4 | 99.5575 | 99.5269 | 99.4950 | 99.4619 | 60.2989 | 60.3197 | 60.3414 | 60.3640 |
0.5 | 99.4461 | 99.4144 | 99.3818 | 99.3485 | 60.3745 | 60.3961 | 60.4184 | 60.4411 |
0.6 | 99.3344 | 99.3026 | 99.2705 | 99.2382 | 60.4504 | 60.4721 | 60.4942 | 60.5164 |
0.7 | 99.2225 | 99.1916 | 99.1608 | 99.1303 | 60.5266 | 60.5478 | 60.5690 | 60.5900 |
0.8 | 99.1103 | 99.0810 | 99.0524 | 99.0245 | 60.6031 | 60.6233 | 60.6431 | 60.6624 |
0.9 | 98.9978 | 98.9709 | 98.9451 | 98.9204 | 60.6799 | 60.6986 | 60.7166 | 60.7338 |
1.0 | 98.8851 | 98.8612 | 98.8387 | 98.8178 | 60.7570 | 60.7737 | 60.7895 | 60.8042 |
t | I, α=1 | I, α=0.95 | I, α=0.90 | I, α=0.85 | R, α=1 | R,α=0.95 | R,α=0.90 | R,α=0.850 |
0.0 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.1 | 10.0749 | 10.0858 | 10.0980 | 10.1118 | 0.0201 | 0.0230 | 0.0263 | 0.0300 |
0.2 | 10.1496 | 10.1654 | 10.1826 | 10.2012 | 0.0402 | 0.0445 | 0.0492 | 0.0543 |
0.3 | 10.2242 | 10.2428 | 10.2626 | 10.2835 | 0.0605 | 0.0656 | 0.0711 | 0.0769 |
0.4 | 10.2985 | 10.3187 | 10.3397 | 10.3615 | 0.0809 | 0.0865 | 0.0924 | 0.0985 |
0.5 | 10.3727 | 10.3935 | 10.4147 | 10.4363 | 0.1013 | 0.1072 | 0.1133 | 0.1195 |
0.6 | 10.4466 | 10.4673 | 10.4880 | 10.5088 | 0.1219 | 0.1278 | 0.1338 | 0.1399 |
0.7 | 10.5204 | 10.5403 | 10.5599 | 10.5792 | 0.1426 | 0.1484 | 0.1542 | 0.1599 |
0.8 | 10.5941 | 10.6126 | 10.6306 | 10.6480 | 0.1634 | 0.1689 | 0.1743 | 0.1796 |
0.9 | 10.6675 | 10.6842 | 10.7002 | 10.7153 | 0.1843 | 0.1894 | 0.1944 | 0.1991 |
1.0 | 10.7408 | 10.7553 | 10.7689 | 10.7813 | 0.2053 | 0.2099 | 0.2142 | 0.2183 |