Research article Special Issues

Investigating of an immune system-cancer mathematical model with Mittag-Leffler kernel

  • Cancer that is difficult to treat, is a very common disease today and there are many types of cancer such as lung, colon, stomach. When cancer settles in the body, the immune system tries to resist it. In this study, the mathematical model of the interaction between immune system components and cancer is discussed and is modified by using Atangana-Baleanu derivative. After investigating the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the fractional immune system-cancer model, numerical simulations are given via predictor-corrector scheme.

    Citation: Necati Özdemir, Esmehan Uçar. Investigating of an immune system-cancer mathematical model with Mittag-Leffler kernel[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1519-1531. doi: 10.3934/math.2020104

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhammad Farman, Aqeel Ahmad, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Umer Saleem, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Velusamy Vijayakumar . Dynamical behavior of tumor-immune system with fractal-fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8751-8773. doi: 10.3934/math.2022489
    [2] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046
    [3] Mdi Begum Jeelani, Abeer S. Alnahdi, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Mohammed S. Abdo, Hanan A. Wahash, M. A. Abdelkawy . Study of the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo type fractional system with a generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2001-2018. doi: 10.3934/math.2022115
    [4] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Sameh Askar, Thongchai Botmart, Aqeel Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad . Modeling and analysis of fractional order Zika model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3912-3938. doi: 10.3934/math.2022216
    [5] Irina Volinsky, Svetlana Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky . Mathematical analysis of tumor-free equilibrium in BCG treatment with effective IL-2 infusion for bladder cancer model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16388-16406. doi: 10.3934/math.2022896
    [6] Abdon Atangana . Fractional derivatives, dimensions, and geometric interpretation: An answer to your worries. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2562-2588. doi: 10.3934/math.2025119
    [7] Mohamed I. Abbas, Maria Alessandra Ragusa . Nonlinear fractional differential inclusions with non-singular Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20328-20340. doi: 10.3934/math.20221113
    [8] Muhammad Sajid Iqbal, Nauman Ahmed, Ali Akgül, Ali Raza, Muhammad Shahzad, Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Rafiq, Fahd Jarad . Analysis of the fractional diarrhea model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13000-13018. doi: 10.3934/math.2022720
    [9] M. Mallika Arjunan, Nabil Mlaiki, V. Kavitha, Thabet Abdeljawad . On fractional state-dependent delay integro-differential systems under the Mittag-Leffler kernel in Banach space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1384-1409. doi: 10.3934/math.2023070
    [10] Veliappan Vijayaraj, Chokkalingam Ravichandran, Thongchai Botmart, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Kasthurisamy Jothimani . Existence and data dependence results for neutral fractional order integro-differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1055-1071. doi: 10.3934/math.2023052
  • Cancer that is difficult to treat, is a very common disease today and there are many types of cancer such as lung, colon, stomach. When cancer settles in the body, the immune system tries to resist it. In this study, the mathematical model of the interaction between immune system components and cancer is discussed and is modified by using Atangana-Baleanu derivative. After investigating the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the fractional immune system-cancer model, numerical simulations are given via predictor-corrector scheme.


    Cancer is one of the most frequently encountered diseases that can lead to the end of human life in spite of the advances in science and medicine. It is a multi-staged disease which occurs as a result of changes in DNA formation (mutation) of abnormal cells. Uncontrolled proliferation of the cells causes tumors and a great number cells mutate in the human body on a daily basis. While some of these mutated cells die, others continue to live and form cancerous cells. Cancer can occur when the immune system or other defensive mechanisms fail to protect the human body from these cells [1]. Cancer cells are different from normal cells due to their size, shape, number, differentiation, function, and ability to travel to distant tissues and organ systems [1]. The immune system recognizes cancer cells and tumors from their antigens [2].

    Dendritic cells known as professional antigen-presenting cells, send tumor antigens to lymph nodes to activate T lymphocytes after recognizing cancer cells. CD4+T cells play a central role in the initiation and progression of immune responses [3] and also help CD8+T cells to activate and proliferate [4]. The basic mechanism of tumor immunity is to kill tumor cells by the help of CD8+T cells. Immune reactions that provide protection against tumors, are typically the task of CD8+T cells. CD4+T cells also play a major role in these tasks [3]. Human CD4+T cells can identify tissue-specific antigens, common tumor antigens and viral antigens caused by tumor transformation [3]. Another task of CD4+T cells is to produce IL-2 as a result of antigen stimulation response. IL-2 has a potent T cell growth factor effect and it has been reported that the application of IL-2 seemingly leads to curative and persistent regressions in cancer patients [5].

    Recently, interest in fractional has increased in order to clarify real life problems because of memory and hereditary property [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. One of the most common fractional operators is Caputo, Riemann-Liouville (RL). However, these operators are considered weakness due to singularity problems caused by their kernel function. As a result of this weakness, Atangana felt the need to define Atangana-Baleanu (AB) derivative in [15] and [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] are the some of the studies about AB derivative.

    Mathematical modeling, known as the reinterpretation of real world problems with mathematical equations, has recently become one of the tools that scientists use to foresee the development of diseases that cause serious problems. [26,27,28,29,30] are some of the studies which attempt to show the relation between cancer and immune system by way of mathematical modeling.

    The study is organized as: In section 2, some basic definitions and theorems to be used in study are briefly mentioned. In section 3, the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the fractional immune system-cancer model is given. The graphics of the numerical solution via predictor-corrector scheme is given in section 4 and comments is made on graphics. Lastly, we finalize our study in section 5. Briefly, the relationship between cancer cells and immune system cells will be examined with AB derivative and the effect of IL-2 and dendritic cells on cancer cells will be discussed using the integer form of model presented by Castiglione in [31].

    Let us rearrange this model with fractional derivative:

    ABC0Dτt(H(t))=a0+b0D(t)H(t)(1H(t)f0)c0H(t),ABC0Dτt(C(t))=a1+b1I(t)(M(t)+D(t))C(t)(1C(t)f1)c1C(t),ABC0Dτt(M(t))=b2M(t)(1M(t)f2)d2M(t)C(t),ABC0Dτt(D(t))=d3D(t)C(t),ABC0Dτt(I(t))=b4D(t)H(t)e4I(t)C(t)c4I(t), (1.1)

    with the initial conditions H(0)=0,C(0)=0,M(0)=1,D(0)=10,I(0)=0, where ABC0Dτt is AB derivative in Caputo sense and τ[0,1]. And H,C,M,D,I represent CD4+T (helper) cells, CD8+T (cytotoxic) cells, myeloid (cancer) cells, dendritic cells and IL-2, respectively.

    In this part, some definitions and properties that will be helpful in this work is given.

    Definition 2.1. Suppose that gH1(a,b), a<b be a function and τ[0,1]. The AB derivative in Caputo sense of order τ of g is given by [15]

    ABCaDτt[g(t)]=F(τ)1τtag(y)Eτ[τ(ty)τ1τ]dy (2.1)

    where Eτ is the Mittag-Leffler function and F(τ) is a normalization function with F(0)=F(1)=1.

    Definition 2.2. Assume that gH1(a,b), a<b be a function and τ[0,1]. The AB derivative in RL sense of order Eτ of g is given by [15]:

    ABRaDτt[g(t)]=F(τ)1τddttag(y)Eτ[τ(ty)τ1τ]dy. (2.2)

    Definition 2.3. The fractional integral is given by [15]:

    ABaIτt[g(t)]=1τF(τ)g(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)tag(λ)(tλ)τ1dλ. (2.3)

    Theorem 2.1. [15] Let g on [a,b] is a continuous function. Given the following inequality holds on [a,b]:

    ABR0Dτt[g(t)]<F(τ)1τg(t), (2.4)

    where g(t)=maxatb|g(t)|.

    Theorem 2.2. The AB derivative in Caputo and RL sense satisfy Lipschitz condition [15]:

    ABC0Dτt[g(t)]ABC0Dτt[h(t)]Hg(t)h(t) (2.5)

    and

    ABR0Dτt[g(t)]ABR0Dτt[h(t)]Hg(t)h(t). (2.6)

    Theorem 2.3. The fractional ordinary differential equation

    ABC0Dτt(h(t))=s(t)

    has a unique solution given as [15]

    h(t)=1τF(τ)s(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)tas(λ)(tλ)τ1dλ.

    Let P=C(K)×C(K)×C(K)×C(K)×C(K) and C(K) be a Banach space of continuous RR valued functions on the interval K with the norm

    (H,C,M,D,I)=H+C+M+D+I

    where H = sup{|H(t)|:tK}, C=sup{|C(t)|:tK}, M=sup{|M(t)|:tK}, D = sup{|D(t)|:tK}, I=sup{|I(t)|:tK}.

    For clarity, we rewrite the model (1.1) of the following form:

    ABC0Dτt(H(t))=N1(t,H),ABC0Dτt(C(t))=N2(t,C),ABC0Dτt(M(t))=N3(t,M),ABC0Dτt(D(t))=N4(t,D),ABC0Dτt(I(t))=N5(t,I). (3.1)

    Using Theorem 2.3, the system (3.1) can be written as:

    H(t)H(0)=1τF(τ)N1(t,H)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N1(λ,H)dλ,C(t)C(0)=1τF(τ)N2(t,C)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N2(λ,C)dλ,M(t)M(0)=1τF(τ)N3(t,M)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N3(λ,M)dλ,D(t)D(0)=1τF(τ)N4(t,D)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N4(λ,D)dλ,I(t)I(0)=1τF(τ)N5(t,I)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N5(λ,I)dλ. (3.2)

    Theorem 3.1. If the following inequality holds

    0b0ψ4+b0f0ψ4(ψ1+ω1)+c0<1,

    then the kernel N1 satisfies the Lipschitz condition and contraction.

    Proof. Let H and H1 be two functions, then we have

    N1(t,H)N1(t,H1)=b0D(t)(H(t)H1(t))b0f0D(t)(H2(t)H21(t))c0(H(t)H1(t))(b0D(t)+b0f0D(t)H(t)+H1(t)+c0)H(t)H1(t)A1H(t)H1(t). (3.3)

    Taking A1=b0ψ4+b0f0ψ4(ψ1+ω1)+c0 where D, H and H1 are bounded functions such that D(t)ψ4, H(t)ψ1, H1(t)ω1 then we have

    N1(t,H)N1(t,H1)A1H(t)H1(t). (3.4)

    Hence, the Lipschitz condition is fulfilled for N1 and 0b0ψ4+b0f0ψ4(ψ1+ω1)+c0<1 implies N1 is also contraction.

    Similarly, the other kernels N2, N3, N4 and N5 satisfy Lipschitz condition and contraction.

    Consider the system (3.2) in the following recursive formula:

    Hn(t)=1τF(τ)N1(t,Hn1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N1(λ,Hn1)dλ,Cn(t)=1τF(τ)N2(t,Cn1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N2(λ,Cn1)dλ,Mn(t)=1τF(τ)N3(t,Mn1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N3(λ,Mn1)dλ,Dn(t)=1τF(τ)N4(t,Dn1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N4(λ,Dn1)dλ,In(t)=1τF(τ)N5(t,In1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N5(λ,In1)dλ, (3.5)

    with the initial conditions

    H0(t)=H(0),C0(t)=C(0),M0(t)=M(0),D0(t)=D(0),I0(t)=I(0).

    We find the difference between the successive terms in the expressions:

    Φ1n(t)=Hn(t)Hn1(t)=1τF(τ)[N1(t,Hn1)N1(t,Hn2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1[N1(λ,Hn1)N1(λ,Hn2)]dλ,
    Φ2n(t)=Cn(t)Cn1(t)=1τF(τ)[N2(t,Cn1)N2(t,Cn2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1[N2(λ,Cn1)N2(λ,Cn2)]dλ,
    Φ3n(t)=Mn(t)Mn1(t)=1τF(τ)[N3(t,Mn1)N3(t,Mn2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1[N3(λ,Mn1)N3(λ,Mn2)]dλ,
    Φ4n(t)=Dn(t)Dn1(t)=1τF(τ)[N4(t,Dn1)N4(t,Dn2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1[N4(λ,Dn1)N4(λ,Dn2)]dλ,
    Φ5n(t)=In(t)In1(t)=1τF(τ)[N5(t,In1)N5(t,In2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1[N5(λ,In1)N5(λ,In2)]dλ. (3.6)

    Notice that

    Hn(t)=nk=1Φ1k(t),Cn(t)=nk=1Φ2k(t),Mn(t)=nk=1Φ3k(t),Dn(t)=nk=1Φ4k(t),In(t)=nk=1Φ5k(t). (3.7)

    Taking the norm on both sides of the Eq. (3.6) and applying triangular identity, we find

    Φ1n(t)=Hn(t)Hn1(t)1τF(τ)[N1(t,Hn1)N1(t,Hn2)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1[N1(λ,Hn1)N1(λ,Hn2)]dλ

    Because the kernel N1 satisfy Lipschitz condition proved in Eq. (3.4), we have

    Φ1n(t)=Hn(t)Hn1(t)1τF(τ)A1Hn1Hn2+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A1t0(tλ)τ1Hn1Hn2dλ

    and

    Φ1n(t)1τF(τ)A1Φ1(n1)(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A1t0(tλ)τ1Φ1(n1)(λ)dλ (3.8)

    Analogously, we have the following results:

    Φ2n(t)1τF(τ)A2Φ2(n1)(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A2t0(tλ)τ1Φ2(n1)(λ)dλ,Φ3n(t)1τF(τ)A3Φ3(n1)(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A3t0(tλ)τ1Φ3(n1)(λ)dλ,Φ4n(t)1τF(τ)A4Φ4(n1)(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A4t0(tλ)τ1Φ4(n1)(λ)dλ,Φ5n(t)1τF(τ)A5Φ5(n1)(t)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)A5t0(tλ)τ1Φ5(n1)(λ)dλ. (3.9)

    In the light of the results in hand, we give the below theorem.

    Theorem 3.2. The fractional model given in (1.1) has a solution, if we can find t0 satisfying the equation

    1τF(τ)Ai+tτ0F(τ)Γ(τ)Ai<1

    for i=1,2,3,4,5.

    Proof. We know that H(t), C(t), M(t), D(t) and I(t) are bounded functions and satisfy Lipschitz condition. From the Eqs. (3.8) and (3.9), we obtain the succeeding relations:

    Φ1n(t)Hn(0)[1τF(τ)A1+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1]n,Φ2n(t)Cn(0)[1τF(τ)A2+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A2]n,Φ3n(t)Mn(0)[1τF(τ)A3+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A3]n,Φ4n(t)Dn(0)[1τF(τ)A4+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A4]n,Φ5n(t)In(0)[1τF(τ)A5+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A5]n. (3.10)

    Thus, the existence and continuity of the above solutions are proved. Our goal is to show that the above functions are solutions of Eq. (1.1), assume that

    H(t)H(0)=Hn(t)K1n(t),C(t)C(0)=Cn(t)K2n(t),M(t)M(0)=Mn(t)K3n(t),D(t)D(0)=Dn(t)K4n(t),I(t)I(0)=In(t)K5n(t). (3.11)

    Then, we have

    K1n(t)=1τF(τ)[N1(t,H)N1(t,Hn1)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1[N1(λ,H)N1(λ,Hn1)]dλ1τF(τ)N1(t,H)N1(t,Hn1)+τF(τ)Γ(τ)t0(tλ)τ1N1(λ,H)N1(λ,Hn1)dλ1τF(τ)A1HHn1+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1HHn1. (3.12)

    By continuing this method recursively, it gives at t0

    K1n(t)(1τF(τ)+tτ0F(τ)Γ(τ))n+1An+11a. (3.13)

    As n approaches to , K1n(t) tends to 0. In an analogous way, it can be shown K2n(t)0, K3n(t)0, K4n(t)0 and K5n(t)0.

    It is another matter to demonstrate the uniqueness of the solutions of the Eq. (1.1). Suppose that there exist another set of solutions H1(t), C1(t), M1(t), D1(t) and I1(t), we find

    H(t)H1(t)=1τF(τ)[N1(t,H)N1(t,H1)]+τF(τ)Γ(τ)×t0(tλ)τ1[N1(λ,H)N1(λ,H1)]dλ (3.14)

    Applying the norm to the Eq. (3.14) and because the kernel satisfies the Lipschitz condition, we find

    H(t)H1(t)1τF(τ)A1H(t)H1(t)+tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1H(t)H1(t) (3.15)

    This gives

    H(t)H1(t)(11τF(τ)A1tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1)0. (3.16)

    Clearly H(t)=H1(t), if the following inequality holds

    (11τF(τ)A1tτF(τ)Γ(τ)A1)>0, (3.17)

    Using the same attitude, we obtain

    C(t)=C1(t),M(t)=M1(t),D(t)=D1(t),I(t)=I1(t).

    In this section, graphs obtained by using predictor-corrector numerical scheme given in [32] of fractional mathematical model in Eq. (1.1) is given. Our aim is to observe how cancer cells and immune system cells change as fractional order changes. In addition, the interaction between cancer cells and immune system cells can be observed by means of graphs. We use the initial conditions (0,0,1,10,0) for H,C,M,D,I, respectively and use parameters a0=104, b0=101, f0=1, c0=0.005, a1=104, b1=102, f1=1, c1=0.005, b2=0.02, f2=1, d2=0.1, d3=0.1, b4=102, e4=107, c4=102 given in [31]. Figures 13 represents that the action of the fractional cancer-immune system model constituent for distinct values of τ and it can be seen that as the fractional order τ is decreased, the number of helper, cytotoxic, dendritic cells and IL-2 are increased, while the cancer cells is declined. In other words, when τ=0.98, approximately 60 percent of cancer cells die, while τ=0.65, about 90 percent die. Moreover, Figures 45 represents that numerical simulations for the Eq. (1.1) at τ=0.9, τ=0.8, τ=0.7 and τ=0.6, respectively.

    Figure 1.  The action of T cells which are constituent of the fractional cancer-immune system model for distinct values of τ.
    Figure 2.  The action of dendritic cells and IL-2 which are constituent of the fractional cancer-immune system model for distinct values of τ.
    Figure 3.  The action of cancer cells which are constituent of the fractional cancer-immune system model for distinct values of τ.
    Figure 4.  Numerical simulations for the Eq. (1.1) at τ=0.9 and τ=0.8, respectively.
    Figure 5.  Numerical simulations for the Eq. (1.1) at τ=0.7 and τ=0.6, respectively.

    Cancer is an issue that needs to be addressed when because of affects many people's lives directly and indirectly. How does the body respond to cancer? The answer to the question can be made more effective in the fight against cancer. So, the integer order cancer-immune system model given in [31] is studied in this paper. Firstly, the cancer-immune system model is modified by AB derivative and then the existence and uniqueness of numerical solution of this model is given. After obtaining graphs related to the model with predictor-corrector numerical method, these graphs is interpreted briefly it can be seen that as τ is increased, it is observed that immune system cells eliminate cancer cells less in these graphs. Apparently, because of the hereditary property of fractional derivative, the fractional derivative is more suitable for real life events.

    The authors declare that no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] L. Marsha, K. R. Conroy, J. L. Davis, et al. Atlas Pathophysiology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
    [2] V. Kumar, A. Abbas, J. Aster, Robbins and cotran pathologic basis of disease, Canada: Elsevier, 2014.
    [3] M. Zanetti, Tapping CD4 T cells for cancer immunotherapy: The choice of personalized genomics, J. Immunol., 194 (2015), 2049-2056. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402669
    [4] D. Cassell, J. Forman, Linked recognition of helper and cytotoxic antigenic determinants for he generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 532 (1998), 51-60.
    [5] H. Choudhry, N. Helmi, W. H. Abdulaal, et al. Prospects of IL-2 in cancer immunotherapy, BioMed Res. Int., 2018 (2018), 9056173.
    [6] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, 2006.
    [7] D. Baleanu, K. Diethelm, E. Scalas, et al. Fractional calculus models and numerical methods, World Scientific, 2012
    [8] N. Özdemir, D. Karadeniz, B. B. Iskender, Fractional optimal control problem of a distributed system in cylindrical coordinates, Phys. Lett. A, 373 (2009), 221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.11.019
    [9] F. Evirgen, N. Özdemir, Multistage adomian decomposition method for solving NLP problems over a nonlinear fractional dynamical system, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 6 (2011), 21003.
    [10] F. Evirgen, Analyze the optimal solutions of optimization problems by means of fractional gradient based system using VIM, An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), 6 (2016), 75-83.
    [11] Z. Hammouch, T. Mekkaoui, Circuit design and simulation for the fractional-order chaotic behavior in a new dynamical system, Complex Intell. Syst., 4 (2018), 251-260. doi: 10.1007/s40747-018-0070-3
    [12] E. Bonyah, A. Atangana, M. A. Khan, Modeling the spread of computer virus via Caputo fractional derivative and the beta derivative, Asia Pacific Journal on Computational Engineering, 4 (2017), 1-15. doi: 10.1186/s40540-016-0019-1
    [13] N. Özdemir, M. Yavuz, Numerical solution of fractional Black-Scholes equation by using the multivariate pade approximation, Acta Phys. Pol. A., 132 (2017), 1050-1053. doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.132.1050
    [14] E. Uçar, N. Özdemir, E. Altun, Fractional order model of immune cells influenced by cancer cells, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 14 (2019), 308.
    [15] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with non-local and non-singular kernel: theory and applications to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763-769. doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
    [16] M. Yavuz, N. Özdemir, H. M. Baskonus, Solutions of partial differential equations using the fractional operator involving Mittag-Leffler kernel, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 215.
    [17] V. F. Morales-Delgadoa, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, M. A. Taneco-Hernandez, et al. Mathematical modeling of the smoking dynamics using fractional differential equations with local and nonlocal kernel, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 11 (2018), 994-1014. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.011.08.06
    [18] N. A. Asif, Z. Hammouch, M. B. Riaz, et al. Analytical solution of a Maxwell fluid with slip effects in view of the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 272.
    [19] I. Koca, Analysis of rubella disease model with non-local and non-singular fractional derivatives, Int. J. Optim. Control Theor. Appl. IJOCTA, 8 (2018), 17-25.
    [20] D. Avcı A. Yetim, Analytical solutions to the advection-diffusion equation with the AtanganaBaleanu derivative over a finite domain, J. BAUN Inst. Sci. Technol., 20 (2018), 382-395.
    [21] S. Uçar, E. Uçar, N. Özdemir, et al. Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation for a smoking model with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 118 (2019), 300-306.
    [22] D. Baleanu, A. Fernandez, On some new properties of fractional derivatives with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 59 (2018), 444-462. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.12.003
    [23] A. Fernandez, D. Baleanu, H. M. Srivastava, Series representations for fractional-calculus operators involving generalised Mittag-Leffler functions, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 67 (2019), 517-527. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.07.035
    [24] S. Uçar, Existence and uniqueness results for a smoking model with determination and education in the frame of non-singular derivatives, Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, in press.
    [25] F. Evirgen, S. Uçar, N. Özdemir, et al. System response of an alcoholism model under the effect of immigration via non-singular kernel derivative, Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, in press.
    [26] J. E. Solis-Perez, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, A. Atangana, A factional mathematical model of breast cancer competition model, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 127 (2019), 38-54. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.06.027
    [27] V. F. Morales-Delgado, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, K. Saad, et al. Application of the Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivatives to mathematical model of cancer chemotherapy effect, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 1167-1193. doi: 10.1002/mma.5421
    [28] P. Vereesha, D. G. Prakasha, H. M. Baskonus, New numerical surfaces to the mathematical model of cancer chemotherapy effect in Caputo fractional derivatives, CHAOS, 29 (2019), 1-13.
    [29] A. Minelli, F. Topputo, F. Bernelli, Controlled drug delivery in cancer immunotherapy: Stability, optimization and monte carlo analysis, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 71 (2011), 2229-2245. doi: 10.1137/100815190
    [30] L. G. De Pillis, A. Radunskaya, A mathematical tumour model with immune resistance and drug therapy: An optimal control approach, Journal of Theoretical Medicine, 3 (2001), 79-100. doi: 10.1080/10273660108833067
    [31] F. Castiglione, B. Piccoli, Cancer immunotheraphy, mathematical modeling and optimal control, J. Theor. Biol., 247 (2007), 723-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.04.003
    [32] D. Baleanu, A. Jajarmi, M. Hajipour, On the nonlinear dynamical systems within the generalized fractional derivatives with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Nonlinear Dyn., 94 (2018), 397-414. doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4367-y
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Beyza Billur İskender Eroğlu, Derya Avcı, Separable solutions of Cattaneo-Hristov heat diffusion equation in a line segment: Cauchy and source problems, 2021, 60, 11100168, 2347, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.12.018
    2. Joshua Asamoah, Zhen Jin, Baba Seidu, F.T. Odoro, Gui-Quan Sun, Faris Alzahrani, Mathematical Modelling and Sensitivity Assessment of COVID-19 Outbreak for Ghana and Egypt, 2020, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.3612877
    3. Seher Melike Aydogan, Dumitru Baleanu, Hakimeh Mohammadi, Shahram Rezapour, On the mathematical model of Rabies by using the fractional Caputo–Fabrizio derivative, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02798-4
    4. Ozlem Defterli, Comparative analysis of fractional order dengue model with temperature effect via singular and non-singular operators, 2021, 144, 09600779, 110654, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110654
    5. Marcela A. Fabio, Silvia A. Seminara, María Inés Troparevsky, 2021, Chapter 1, 978-3-030-61712-7, 1, 10.1007/978-3-030-61713-4_1
    6. Sümeyra Uçar, Necati Özdemir, İlknur Koca, Eren Altun, Novel analysis of the fractional glucose–insulin regulatory system with non-singular kernel derivative, 2020, 135, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00420-w
    7. Eyüp Akçetin, Ilknur Koca, Muhammet Burak Kiliç, New analysis and application of fractional order Schrödinger equation using with Atangana–Batogna numerical scheme, 2021, 37, 0749-159X, 196, 10.1002/num.22525
    8. Ali Yousef, Fatma Bozkurt, Thabet Abdeljawad, Mathematical modeling of the immune-chemotherapeutic treatment of breast cancer under some control parameters, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03151-5
    9. Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Ilknur Koca, Fractional stochastic sır model, 2021, 22113797, 104124, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104124
    10. Ali Yousef, A fractional-order model of COVID-19 with a strong Allee effect considering the fear effect spread by social networks to the community and the existence of the silent spreaders during the pandemic stage, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 10052, 10.3934/math.2022560
    11. Sümeyra Uçar, Analysis of hepatitis B disease with fractal–fractional Caputo derivative using real data from Turkey, 2023, 419, 03770427, 114692, 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114692
    12. Zulqurnain Sabir, Maham Munawar, Mohamed A. Abdelkawy, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Canan Ünlü, Mdi Begum Jeelani, Abeer S. Alnahdi, Numerical Investigations of the Fractional-Order Mathematical Model Underlying Immune-Chemotherapeutic Treatment for Breast Cancer Using the Neural Networks, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 184, 10.3390/fractalfract6040184
    13. Esmehan Uçar, Necati Özdemir, New Fractional Cancer Mathematical Model via IL-10 Cytokine and Anti-PD-L1 Inhibitor, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 151, 10.3390/fractalfract7020151
    14. Peijiang Liu, Taj Munir, Ting Cui, Anwarud Din, Peng Wu, Mathematical assessment of the dynamics of the tobacco smoking model: An application of fractional theory, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 7143, 10.3934/math.2022398
    15. Derya Avcı, Beyza Billur İskender Eroğlu, Optimal control of the Cattaneo–Hristov heat diffusion model, 2021, 232, 0001-5970, 3529, 10.1007/s00707-021-03019-z
    16. Esmehan Uçar, Necati Özdemir, Eren Altun, Qualitative analysis and numerical simulations of new model describing cancer, 2023, 422, 03770427, 114899, 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114899
    17. M. Iadh Ayari, Sabri T.M. Thabet, Qualitative properties and approximate solutions of thermostat fractional dynamics system via a nonsingular kernel operator, 2023, 1319-5166, 10.1108/AJMS-06-2022-0147
    18. Mohammad Partohaghighi, Kalani Rubasinghe, Ali Akgül, Esra Karatas Akgül, Analysis of the Fractal-Fractional Modelling of Immune-Tumor Problem, 2022, 8, 2349-5103, 10.1007/s40819-022-01331-3
    19. A.S.V. Ravi Kanth, Sangeeta Devi, A computational approach for numerical simulations of the fractal–fractional autoimmune disease model, 2022, 165, 09600779, 112829, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112829
    20. Derya Avcı, Beyza Billur İskender Eroğlu, Necati Özdemir, A heat transfer problem with exponential memory and the associated thermal stresses, 2023, 39, 0749-159X, 231, 10.1002/num.22873
    21. M. Elkaf, K. Allali, Fractional derivative model for tumor cells and immune system competition, 2023, 10, 23129794, 288, 10.23939/mmc2023.02.288
    22. Sumeyra UCAR, Conformable Flett’s theorem and Sahoo and Riedel theorem, 2023, 25, 1301-7985, 464, 10.25092/baunfbed.1212939
    23. Awatif Muflih Alqahtani, Akanksha Shukla, Computational analysis of multi-layered Navier–Stokes system by Atangana–Baleanu derivative, 2024, 32, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2023.2290723
    24. Ali Alhajraf, Ali Yousef, Fatma Bozkurt, An Analysis of a Fractional-Order Model of Colorectal Cancer and the Chemo-Immunotherapeutic Treatments with Monoclonal Antibody, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 2374, 10.3390/math11102374
    25. Bo Li, Kaiwen Chen, Bo Zhang, Dynamics of the Three-Compartment Financial Bubble Model under the Mittag-Leffler Operator, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 608, 10.3390/fractalfract7080608
    26. Sumeyra UCAR, Existence Results for a Computer Virus Spreading Model with Atangana-Baleanu Derivative, 2020, 17, 1305-130X, 67, 10.18466/cbayarfbe.716573
    27. Shumaila Javeed, Zain Ul Abdeen, Dumitru Baleanu, Fractional Modeling of Cancer with Mixed Therapies, 2023, 28, 2768-6701, 10.31083/j.fbl2808174
    28. S. Esmaili, M. H. Heydari, M. Razzaghi, A fractional model of tumor growth with a free boundary, 2024, 1598-5865, 10.1007/s12190-024-02325-8
    29. G. M. Vijayalakshmi, M. Ariyanatchi, Vediyappan Govindan, Mustafa Inc, Fractal-fractional modelling of thrombocytopenia influence on pregnant women in the context of dengue infection with Mittag–Leffler decay analysis, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02278-8
    30. Mohammed Althubyani, Sayed Saber, Hyers–Ulam Stability of Fractal–Fractional Computer Virus Models with the Atangana–Baleanu Operator, 2025, 9, 2504-3110, 158, 10.3390/fractalfract9030158
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4697) PDF downloads(593) Cited by(30)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog