Research article

Hypergeometric Euler numbers

  • Received: 04 October 2019 Accepted: 10 December 2019 Published: 19 January 2020
  • MSC : 11B68, 11B37, 11C20, 15A15, 33C20

  • In this paper, we introduce the hypergeometric Euler number as an analogue of the hypergeometric Bernoulli number and the hypergeometric Cauchy number. We study several expressions and sums of products of hypergeometric Euler numbers. We also introduce complementary hypergeometric Euler numbers and give some characteristic properties. There are strong reasons why these hypergeometric numbers are important. The hypergeometric numbers have one of the advantages that yield the natural extensions of determinant expressions of the numbers, though many kinds of generalizations of the Euler numbers have been considered by many authors.

    Citation: Takao Komatsu, Huilin Zhu. Hypergeometric Euler numbers[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1284-1303. doi: 10.3934/math.2020088

    Related Papers:

    [1] Takao Komatsu, Ram Krishna Pandey . On hypergeometric Cauchy numbers of higher grade. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6630-6646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021390
    [2] Takao Komatsu, Wenpeng Zhang . Several expressions of truncated Bernoulli-Carlitz and truncated Cauchy-Carlitz numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5939-5954. doi: 10.3934/math.2020380
    [3] Taekyun Kim, Hye Kyung Kim, Dae San Kim . Some identities on degenerate hyperbolic functions arising from $ p $-adic integrals on $ \mathbb{Z}_p $. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25443-25453. doi: 10.3934/math.20231298
    [4] Dojin Kim, Patcharee Wongsason, Jongkyum Kwon . Type 2 degenerate modified poly-Bernoulli polynomials arising from the degenerate poly-exponential functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 9716-9730. doi: 10.3934/math.2022541
    [5] Tabinda Nahid, Mohd Saif, Serkan Araci . A new class of Appell-type Changhee-Euler polynomials and related properties. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13566-13579. doi: 10.3934/math.2021788
    [6] Jizhen Yang, Yunpeng Wang . Congruences involving generalized Catalan numbers and Bernoulli numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24331-24344. doi: 10.3934/math.20231240
    [7] Ling Zhu . Asymptotic expansion of a finite sum involving harmonic numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2756-2763. doi: 10.3934/math.2021168
    [8] Waseem Ahmad Khan, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dumitru Baleanu . A note on (p, q)-analogue type of Fubini numbers and polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2743-2757. doi: 10.3934/math.2020177
    [9] Letelier Castilla, William Ramírez, Clemente Cesarano, Shahid Ahmad Wani, Maria-Fernanda Heredia-Moyano . A new class of generalized Apostol–type Frobenius–Euler polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3623-3641. doi: 10.3934/math.2025167
    [10] Nadia N. Li, Wenchang Chu . Explicit formulae for Bernoulli numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28170-28194. doi: 10.3934/math.20241366
  • In this paper, we introduce the hypergeometric Euler number as an analogue of the hypergeometric Bernoulli number and the hypergeometric Cauchy number. We study several expressions and sums of products of hypergeometric Euler numbers. We also introduce complementary hypergeometric Euler numbers and give some characteristic properties. There are strong reasons why these hypergeometric numbers are important. The hypergeometric numbers have one of the advantages that yield the natural extensions of determinant expressions of the numbers, though many kinds of generalizations of the Euler numbers have been considered by many authors.


    In this paper, Euler numbers En are defined by the generating function

    1cosht=n=0Entnn!. (1.1)

    One of the different definitions is

    2et+1=n=0Entnn!

    (see e.g. [1]). Here, En are sometimes called the zig numbers or secant numbers. There have been many generalizations of Euler numbers from the different view points. For example, one kind of poly-Euler numbers is a typical generalization, in the aspect of L-functions ([2,3,4]). Other generalizations can be found in [5,6] and the reference therein.

    Bernoulli numbers and Cauchy numbers also have many generalizations. Universal Bernoulli numbers were studied in [7,8], and particularly, some universal Kummer congruences were established in [7,8]. In this paper, we focus on the generalizations based upon hypergeometric functions. For N1, define hypergeometric Bernoulli numbers BN,n (see [9,10,11]) by

    11F1(1;N+1;t)=tN/N!etN1n=0tn/n!=n=0BN,ntnn!,

    where

    1F1(a;b;z)=n=0(a)(n)(b)(n)znn!

    is the confluent hypergeometric function with (x)(n)=x(x+1)(x+n1) (n1) and (x)(0)=1. When N=1, Bn=B1,n are classical Bernoulli numbers defined by

    tet1=n=0Bntnn!.

    In addition, define hypergeometric Cauchy numbers cN,n (see [12]) by

    12F1(1,N;N+1;t)=(1)N1tN/Nlog(1+t)N1n=1(1)n1tn/n=n=0cN,ntnn!,

    where

    2F1(a,b;c;z)=n=0(a)(n)(b)(n)(c)(n)znn!

    is the Gauss hypergeometric function. When N=1, cn=c1,n are classical Cauchy numbers defined by

    tlog(1+t)=n=0cntnn!.

    Some of the similar generalizations can be found in [13] (see also references therein), but their generating functions are not related to hypergeometric functions. There are several advantages for these so-called hypergeometric numbers. For example, as shown in Section 2, a naturally generalized expression is possible for hypergeometric numbers, but not for poly numbers like poly-Bernoulli or poly-Cauchy numbers, which are differently directed generalized Bernoulli or Cauchy numbers. Recently, poly-Euler numbers [4] are proposed and studied as one kind of poly-numbers. On the contrary, in this paper, we consider a generalization for Euler numbers by using hypergeometric functions. Then we study their characteristic or combinatorial properties.

    For N0 define hypergeometric Euler numbers EN,n (n=0,1,2,) by

    11F2(1;N+1,(2N+1)/2;t2/4)=n=0EN,ntnn!, (1.2)

    where 1F2(a;b,c;z) is the hypergeometric function defined by

    1F2(a;b,c;z)=n=0(a)(n)(b)(n)(c)(n)znn!.

    It is seen that

    coshtN1n=0t2n(2n)!=t2N(2N)!n=0(2N)!n!(2n+2N)!(t2)nn!=t2N(2N)!1F2(1;N+1,2N+12;t24). (1.3)

    When N=0, then En=E0,n are classical Euler numbers defined in (1.1). In [14], the truncated Euler polynomial Em,n(x) is introduced as a generalization of the classical Euler polynomial En(x). The concept is similar but without hypergeometric functions.

    We list the numbers EN,n for 0N6 and 0n12 in Table 1 in Appendix. From (1.3) we see that EN,n=0 if n is odd. Similarly to poly-Euler numbers ([2,3,4]), hypergeometric Euler numbers are rational numbers, though the classical Euler numbers are integers.

    From (1.2) and (1.3), we have

    t2N(2N)!=(n=Nt2n(2n)!)(n=0EN,ntnn!)=t2N(n=01+(1)n2tn(n+2N)!)(n=0EN,ntnn!)=t2Nn=0(ni=01+(1)ni2(2N+ni)!EN,ii!)tn.

    Hence, for n1, we have

    ni=01+(1)ni(2N+ni)!i!EN,i=0.

    Thus, we have the following proposition. Note that EN,n=0 when n is odd.

    Proposition 1.

    n/2i=01(2N+n2i)!(2i)!EN,2i=0(n2 is even)

    and EN,0=1.

    By using the identity in Proposition 1 or the identity

    EN,n=n!(2N)!n/21i=0EN,2i(2N+n2i)!(2i)!, (1.4)

    we can obtain the values of EN,n (n=0,2,4,). We record the first few values of EN,n:

    EN,2=2(2N+1)(2N+2),EN,4=24!(4N+5)(2N+1)2(2N+2)2(2N+3)(2N+4),EN,6=46!(8N32N265N61)(2N+1)3(2N+2)3(2N+3)(2N+4)(2N+5)(2N+6),EN,8=168!(2N+1)4(2N+2)4(2N+3)2(2N+4)2(2N+6)(2N+7)(2N+8)×(16N644N5516N4667N3+1283N2+3126N+1662).

    We have an explicit expression of EN,n for each even n:

    Theorem 1. For N0 and n1 we have

    EN,2n=(2n)!nr=1(1)ri1++ir=ni1,,ir1((2N)!)r(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ir)!.

    Proof. The proof is done by induction for n. If n=1, then

    EN,2=2!(1)(2N)!(2N+2)!=2(2N+1)(2N+2).

    Assume that the result is valid up to n1. Then by Proposition 1

    EN,2n=(2n)!(2N)!n1i=0EN,2i(2N+2n2i)!(2i)!=(2n)!(2N)!n1i=11(2N+2n2i)!ir=1(1)ri1++ir=ii1,,ir1((2N)!)r(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ir)!(2n)!(2N)!1(2N+2n)!=(2n)!(2N)!n1r=1(1)r((2N)!)rn1i=r1(2N+2n2i)!i1++ir=ii1,,ir11(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ir)!(2n)!(2N)!(2N+2n)!=(2n)!(2N)!nr=2(1)r1((2N)!)r1n1i=r11(2N+2n2i)!×i1++ir1=ii1,,ir111(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ir1)!(2n)!(2N)!(2N+2n)!=(2n)!nr=2(1)r((2N)!)ri1++ir=ni1,,ir11(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ir)!(2n)!(2N)!(2N+2n)!(ni=ir)=(2n)!nr=1(1)ri1++ir=ni1,,ir1((2N)!)r(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ir)!.

    These hypergeometric numbers have one of the advantages that yield the natural extensions of determinant expressions of the numbers, though many kinds of generalizations of the Euler numbers have been considered by many authors.

    By using Proposition 1 or the relation (1.4), we have a determinant expression of hypergeometric Euler numbers ([15]).

    Proposition 2. The hypergeometric Euler numbers EN,2n (N0, n1) can be expressed as

    EN,2n=(1)n(2n)!|(2N)!(2N+2)!10(2N)!(2N+4)!1(2N)!(2N+2n)!(2N)!(2N+4)!(2N)!(2N+2)!|.

    In 1875, Glaisher gave several interesting determinant expressions of numbers, including Bernoulli, Cauchy and Euler numbers. When N=0, the determinant in Proposition (2) is reduced to a famous determinant expression of Euler numbers (cf. [16,p.52]):

    E2n=(1)n(2n)!|12!1014!12!11(2n2)!1(2n4)!12!11(2n)!1(2n2)!14!12!|.

    In [17], the hypergeometric Bernoulli numbers BN,n (N1, n1) can be expressed as

    BN,n=(1)nn!|N!(N+1)!10N!(N+2)!N!(N+1)!1N!(N+n1)!N!(N+n2)!N!(N+1)!1N!(N+n)!N!(N+n1)!N!(N+2)!N!(N+1)!|.

    When N=1, we have a determinant expression of Bernoulli numbers ([16,p.53]):

    Bn=(1)nn!|12!1013!12!11n!1(n1)!12!11(n+1)!1n!13!12!|. (2.1)

    In [18], the hypergeometric Cauchy numbers cN,n (N1, n1) can be expressed as

    cN,n=n!|NN+110NN+2NN+11NN+n1NN+n2NN+11NN+nNN+n1NN+2NN+1|.

    When N=1, we have a determinant expression of Cauchy numbers ([16,p.50]):

    cn=n!|1210131211n1n11211n+11n1312|. (2.2)

    In [15], the complementary Euler numbers ˆEn and their hypergeometric generalizations (defined below) have also determinant expressions.

    We define the Hasse-Teichmüller derivative H(n) of order n by

    H(n)(m=Rcmzm)=m=Rcm(mn)zmn

    for m=RcmzmF((z)), where R is an integer and cmF for any mR.

    The Hasse-Teichmüller derivatives satisfy the product rule [19], the quotient rule [20] and the chain rule [21]. One of the product rules can be described as follows.

    Lemma 1. For fiF[[z]] (i=1,,k) with k2 and for n1, we have

    H(n)(f1fk)=i1,,ik0i1++ik=nH(i1)(f1)H(ik)(fk).

    The quotient rules can be described as follows.

    Lemma 2. For fF[[z]]{0} and n1, we have

    H(n)(1f)=nk=1(1)kfk+1i1,,ik1i1++ik=nH(i1)(f)H(ik)(f) (3.1)
    =nk=1(n+1k+1)(1)kfk+1i1,,ik0i1++ik=nH(i1)(f)H(ik)(f). (3.2)

    By using the Hasse-Teichmüller derivative of order n, we shall obtain some explicit expressions of the hypergeometric Euler numbers.

    Another proof of Theorem 1. Put

    F:=1F2(1;N+1,2N+12;t24)=n=0(2N)!(2N+2n)!t2n

    for simplicity. Note that

    H(i)(F)|t=0=j=0(2N)!(2N+2j)!(2ji)t2ji|t=0={(2N)!/(2N+i)!if i is even;0if i is odd.

    Hence, by using Lemma 2 (3.1), we have

    EN,nn!=H(n)(1F)|t=0=nk=1(1)kFk+1|t=0i1,,ik1i1++ik=nH(i1)(F)|t=0H(ik)(F)|t=0=nk=1(1)ki1,,ik12(i1++ik)=n((2N)!)k(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ik)!.

    We can express the hypergeometric Euler numbers also in terms of the binomial coefficients. In fact, by using Lemma 2 (3.2) instead of Lemma 2 (3.1) in the above proof, we obtain a little different expression from one in Theorem 1.

    Proposition 3. For N0 and even n2,

    EN,n=n!nk=1(1)k(n+1k+1)i1,,ik0i1++ik=n/2((2N)!)k(2N+2i1)!(2N+2ik)!.

    For example, when n=4, we get

    E4=4!((52)14!+(53)(24!+12!2!)(54)(34!+32!2!)+(55)(44!+62!2!))=5,E1,4=4!((52)216!+(53)22(26!2!+14!4!)(54)23(36!2!2!+34!4!2!)+(55)24(46!2!2!2!+64!4!2!2!))=110,E2,4=4!((52)4!18!+(53)(4!)2(28!4!+16!6!)(54)(4!)3(38!4!4!+36!6!4!)+(55)(4!)4(48!4!4!4!+66!6!4!4!))=131050,E3,4=4!((52)6!110!+(53)(6!)2(210!6!+18!8!)(54)(6!)3(310!6!6!+38!8!6!)+(55)(6!)4(410!6!6!6!+68!8!6!6!))=175880.

    If N=1, we have the following relation between hypergeometric Euler numbers and Bernoulli numbers.

    Theorem 2. For n1 we have

    E1,n=(n1)Bn.

    Proof. The result is clear for n=0,1 and odd numbers n. By using the following Lemma 3 and Proposition 1, we get the result.

    Lemma 3. For n1 we have

    ni=0(i1)Bi(ni+2)!i!={0if n is even;Bn+1/n!if n is odd.

    Proof. Firstly,

    n=0ni=0(i1)Bi(ni+2)!i!xn=(k=0xk(k+2)!)(i=0(i1)Bixii!)=(1x2k=0xk+2(k+2)!)(2i=0Bixii!+ddxi=0Bixi+1i!)=ex1xx2(2xex1+2x(ex1)x2ex(ex1)2)=ex(x+1ex)(ex1)2.

    On the other hand,

    12n=0B2n+2x2n+1(2n+1)!=12ddx(n=0Bnxnn!B0B1x)=12ddx(xex11+x2)=ex(x+1ex)(ex1)2.

    Comparing the coefficients of xn, we get the result.

    It is known that

    ni=0(2n2i)E2i=0

    with E0=1, and E2i1=0 (i1).

    First, let us consider the sums of products of hypergeometric Euler numbers:

    YN,2(n)=ni=0(2n2i)EN,2iEN,2n2i.

    It is clear that

    ni=0(ni)EN,iEN,ni=0

    if n is odd.

    If N=0, then

    Y0,2(n)=22n+2(22n+21)B2n+22n+2(n0).

    Indeed,

    {Y0,2(n)}n0=1,2,16,272,7936,353792,22368256,1903757312,.

    The numbers taking their absolute value are called the tangent numbers or the zag numbers ([22,A000182]). Thus, we also have

    Y0,2(n)=2n+2k=1kj=0(kj)(1)j+1(k2j)2n+22k1kk.

    In other words, they appear as numerators in the Maclaurin series of tanx:

    tanx=n=0(1)nY0,2(n)x2n+1(2n+1)!.

    Put

    F:=1F2(1;N+1,2N+12;t24)=n=0(2N)!(2N+2n)!t2n

    for simplicity again. Then by

    ddtF=n=0(2n)(2N)!(2N+2n)!t2n1,

    we have

    2NF+tddtF=2N1F2(1;N,2N+12;t24). (5.1)

    For further simplicity, we put for k=1,2,,2N

    F(2Nk)=1F2(1;k+22,k+12+12;t24)

    with F(0)=F. Then, in general, we obtain for k=1,2,,2N

    kF(2Nk)+tddtF(2Nk)=kF(2Nk+1). (5.2)

    Proposition 4. For k=0,1,,2N we have

    cosht=ki=0tii!(ki)didtiF(2Nk).

    Proof. For k=0, we get

    F(2N)=n=0t2n(2n)!=cosht.

    Assume that the result holds for some k0. Then by (5.2)

    ki=0tii!(ki)didtiF(2Nk)=ki=0tii!(ki)didti(F(2Nk1)+tk+1ddtF(2Nk1))=ki=0tii!(ki)(didtiF(2Nk1)+ik+1didtiF(2Nk1)+tk+1di+1dti+1F(2Nk1))=ki=0tii!(ki)k+i+1k+1didtiF(2Nk1)+k+1i=1ti1(i1)!(ki1)tk+1didtiF(2Nk1)=k+1i=0tii!(k+1i)didtiF(2Nk1).

    We introduce the complementary hypergeometric Euler numbers ˆEN,n by

    t2N+1/(2N+1)!sinhtN1n=0t2n+1/(2n+1)!=n=0ˆEN,ntnn!

    as an analogue of (1.2). When N=0, ˆEn=ˆE0,n are the complementary Euler numbers defined by

    tsinht=n=0ˆEntnn!

    as an analogue of (1.1). In [23], they are called weighted Bernoulli numbers, but this naming means different in other literatures. Since

    F:=1F2(1;N,2N+12;t24)=n=0(2N1)!(2N+2n1)!t2n

    and

    ddtF=F2ddt1F, (5.3)

    by (5.1) we have

    1F2=1F(1Ft2Nddt1F). (5.4)

    Since

    1F=t2N1(2N1)!n=0t2N+2n1/(2N+2n1)!=n=0ˆEN1,ntnn!

    and

    1Ft2Nddt1F=n=0EN,ntnn!t2Nn=1EN,ntn1(n1)!=n=02Nn2NEN,ntnn!,

    we have

    1F(1Ft2Nddt1F)=(m=0ˆEN1,mtmm!)(k=02Nk2NEN,ktkk!)=n=0nk=0(nk)2Nk2NEN,kˆEN1,nktnn!.

    Comparing the coefficients, we obtain a result about the sums of products.

    Theorem 3. For N1 and n0,

    ni=0(ni)EN,iEN,ni=nk=0(nk)2Nk2NEN,kˆEN1,nk.

    Using (5.3) and (5.4) again, we have

    1F3=1F(1F2t2N1Fddt1F)=1F(1F2t4Nddt1F2).

    Since

    1F2t4Nddt1F2=n=04Nn4Nnk=0(nk)2Nk2NEN,kˆEN1,nktnn!,

    we have

    1F(1F2t4Nddt1F2)=(i=0ˆEN1,itii!)(m=04Nm4Nmk=0(mk)2Nk2NEN,kˆEN1,mktmm!)=n=0nm=0mk=0(nm)(mk)(4Nm)(2Nk)8N2EN,kˆEN1,nmˆEN1,mktnn!.

    Comparing the coefficients, we get a result about the sums of products for trinomial coefficients.

    Theorem 4. For N1 and n0,

    i1+i2+i3=ni1,i2,i30(ni1,i2,i3)EN,i1EN,i2EN,i3=nm=0mk=0(nm)(mk)(4Nm)(2Nk)8N2EN,kˆEN1,nmˆEN1,mk.

    Complementary hypergeometric Euler numbers

    By using the similar methods in previous sections, the complementary hypergeometric Euler numbers satisfy the recurrence relation for even n

    n/2i=0ˆEN,2i(2N+n2i+1)!(2i)!=0

    or

    ˆEN,n=n!(2N+1)!n/21i=0ˆEN,2i(2N+n2i+1)!(2i)!.

    By using the Hasse-Teichmüller derivative or by proving by induction, we have

    Theorem 5. For N0 and n1 we have

    ˆEN,n=n!nk=1(1)ki1,,ik1i1++ik=n/2((2N+1)!)k(2N+2i1+1)!(2N+2ik+1)!=n!nk=1(1)k(n+1k+1)i1,,ik0i1++ik=n/2((2N+1)!)k(2N+2i1+1)!(2N+2ik+1)!.

    Some initial values of ˆEN,n (n=0,2,4,), we have

    ˆEN,2=2(2N+2)(2N+3),ˆEN,4=24!(4N+7)(2N+2)2(2N+3)2(2N+4)(2N+5),ˆEN,6=46!(8N3+10N261N93))(2N+2)3(2N+3)3(2N+4)(2N+5)(2N+6)(2N+7),ˆEN,8=88!(2N+2)4(2N+3)4(2N+4)2(2N+5)2(2N+7)(2N+8)(2N+9)×(32N6+8N51132N43538N31063N2+7280N+6858).

    Put

    ˆF=n=0(2N+1)!(2N+2n+1)!t2n

    so that

    1ˆF=n=0ˆEN,ntnn!.

    Since

    (2N+1)ˆF+tddtˆF=(2N+1)F,

    we have

    1ˆF2=1F(1ˆFt2N+1ddt1ˆF)=(m=0EN,mtmm!)(k=02Nk+12N+1ˆEN,ktkk!)=n=0nk=0(nk)2Nk+12N+1ˆEN,kEN,nktnn!.

    Hence, as an analogue of Theorem 3, we have the following.

    Theorem 6. For N1 and n0,

    ni=0(ni)ˆEN,iˆEN,ni=nk=0(nk)2Nk+12N+1ˆEN,kEN,nk.

    We then have

    1ˆF3=1F(1ˆF2t2(2N+1)ddt1ˆF2).

    Since

    1ˆF2t2(2N+1)ddt1ˆF2=n=04Nn+22(2N+1)nk=0(nk)2Nk+12N+1ˆEN,kEN,nktnn!,

    we have the following result as an analogue of Theorem 4.

    Theorem 7. For N1 and n0,

    i1+i2+i3=ni1,i2,i30(ni1,i2,i3)ˆEN,i1ˆEN,i2ˆEN,i3=nm=0mk=0(nm)(mk)(4Nm+2)(2Nk+1)2(2N+1)2ˆEN,kEN,nmEN,mk.

    One can continue to obtain the sum of four or more products, though the results seem to become more complicated.

    We shall use Trudi's formula to obtain different explicit expressions for the hypergeometric Euler numbers EN,n.

    Lemma 4 (Trudi's formula [24,25]). For a positive integer m, we have

    |a1a2ama0a100a1a200a0a1|=t1+2t2++mtm=m(t1++tmt1,,tm)(a0)mt1tmat11at22atmm,

    where (t1++tmt1,,tm)=(t1++tm)!t1!tm! are the multinomial coefficients.

    This relation is known as Trudi's formula [26,Vol.3,p.214], [25] and the case a0=1 of this formula is known as Brioschi's formula [27], [26,Vol.3,pp.208-209].

    In addition, there exists the following inversion formula (see, e.g. [24]), which is based upon the relation:

    nk=0(1)nkαkD(nk)=0(n1).

    Lemma 5. If {αn}n0 is a sequence defined by α0=1 and

    αn=|R(1)10R(2)1R(n)R(2)R(1)|, then R(n)=|α110α21αnα2α1|.

    Moreover, if

    A=(10α11αnα11), then A1=(10R(1)1R(n)R(1)1).

    From Trudi's formula, it is possible to give the combinatorial expression

    αn=t1+2t2++ntn=n(t1++tnt1,,tn)(1)nt1tnR(1)t1R(2)t2R(n)tn.

    By applying these lemmata to Proposition 2, we obtain an explicit expression for the hypergeometric Euler numbers EN,n.

    Theorem 8. For N0 and n1,

    EN,2n=(2n)!t1+2t2++ntn=n(t1++tnt1,,tn)(1)t1++tn((2N)!(2N+2)!)t1((2N)!(2N+4)!)t2((2N)!(2N+2n)!)tn.

    Moreover,

    (1)n(2N)!(2N+2n)!=|EN,22!10EN,44!1EN,2n(2n)!EN,44!EN,22!|,

    and

    (10EN,22!1EN,44!EN,22!1(1)nEN,2n(2n)!EN,44!EN,22!1)1=(10(2N)!(2N+2)!1(2N)!(2N+4)!(2N)!(2N+2)!1(2N)!(2N+2n)!(2N)!(2N+4)!(2N)!(2N+2)!1).

    When N=0 in Theorem 8, we have a different expression for the classical Euler numbers En.

    Corollary 1. For n1

    E2n=(2n)!t1+2t2++ntn=n(t1++tnt1,,tn)(1)t1++tn(12!)t1(14!)t2(1(2n)!)tn.

    Moreover,

    (1)n(2n)!=|E22!10E44!1E2n(2n)!E44!E22!|.

    Similarly, by the results in [15], after applying Lemmata 4 and 5, we have a new expression of the complementary hypergeometric Euler numbers ˆEN,n.

    Theorem 9. For N0 and n1,

    ˆE(r)N,2n=(2n)!t1+2t2++ntn=n(t1++tnt1,,tn)(1)t1++tn((2N+1)!(2N+3)!)t1((2N+1)!(2N+5)!)t2((2N+1)!(2N+2n+1)!)tn.

    Moreover,

    (1)n(2N+1)!(2N+2n+1)!=|ˆEN,22!10ˆEN,44!1ˆEN,2n(2n)!ˆEN,44!ˆEN,22!|,

    and

    (10ˆEN,22!1ˆEN,44!ˆEN,22!1(1)nˆEN,2n(2n)!ˆEN,44!ˆEN,22!1)1=(10(2N+1)!(2N+3)!1(2N+1)!(2N+5)!(2N+1)!(2N+3)!1(2N+1)!(2N+2n+1)!(2N+1)!(2N+5)!(2N+1)!(2N+3)!1).

    When N=0 in Theorem 9, we have a different expression for the original complementary Euler numbers ˆEn.

    Corollary 2. For n1

    ˆE2n=(2n)!t1+2t2++ntn=n(t1++tnt1,,tn)(1)t1++tn(13!)t1(15!)t2(1(2n+1)!)tn.

    Moreover,

    (1)n(2n+1)!=|ˆE22!10ˆE44!1ˆE2n(2n)!ˆE44!ˆE22!|.

    There are more advantages and applications for so-called hypergeometric numbers. For example, we can show the following continued fraction expansion of the generating function of hypergeometric Euler numbers.

    n=0EN,ntnn!=1t2(2N+1)(2N+2)+t2(2N+1)(2N+2)t2(2N+3)(2N+4)+t2(2N+3)(2N+4)t2(2N+5)(2N+6)+t2.

    When N=0, we get a continued fraction expansion of the classical Euler numbers.

    n=0Entnn!=1cosht=1t212+t212t234+t234t256+t2.

    Similarly, one of the continued fraction expansions of the generating function of complementary hypergeometric Euler numbers is given by

    n=0ˆEN,ntnn!=1t2(2N+2)(2N+3)+t2(2N+2)(2N+3)t2(2N+4)(2N+5)+t2(2N+4)(2N+5)t2(2N+6)(2N+7)+t2.

    When N=0, we get a continued fraction expansion of the complementary Euler numbers.

    n=0ˆEntnn!=tsinht=1t223+t223t245+t245t267+t2.

    However, so-called poly-numbers do not have such natural generalizations in continued fractions. The more detailed and more general results including other hypergeometric numbers will be discussed in other papers.

    In addition, hypergeometric numbers can be discussed on the rational function fields. They will be naturally generalized from Bernoullli-Carlitz, Cauchy-Carlitz or Euler-Carlitz numbers. Their details and structures will be also studied in other papers (e.g., see [28,29]).

    The second author was partly supported by China National Science Foundation Grant (No. 11501477), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 20720170001) and the Science Fund of Fujian Province (No. 2015J01024). Both authors thank the anonymous referees for their useful comments.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Table 1.  The numbers EN,n for 0N6 and 0n14.
    n 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
    E0,n 1 1 5 61 1385 50521 2702765199360981
    E1,n 1 1/6 1/10 5/42 7/30 15/22 7601/273091/6
    E2,n 1 1/15 13/1050 1/350 31/173250 1343/750750 6137/23887503499/6693750
    E3,n 1 1/28 17/5880 29/362208 863/6420960 6499/131843712 6997213/15689401728068936107/917226562560
    E4,n 1 1/45 7/7425 53/2027025 443/22052250 10157/4873547250 558599021/12639544792875039045649/62503243481250
    E5,n 1 1/66 25/66066 47/2906904 16945/5300012718 475767/492312292472 71844089/2688025116897121162911301/4483980359834976
    E6,n 1 1/91 29/165620 1205/153728484 2279/4467168888 6430761/25339270989032 17675104079/4917799642149532320837165624457/24588998210747661600

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV


    [1] T. M. Apostol, On the Lerch Zeta function, Pacific. J. Math. 1 (1951), 161-167. doi: 10.2140/pjm.1951.1.161
    [2] Y. Ohno, Y. Sasaki, On the parity of poly-Euler numbers, RIMS Kokyuroku Bessatsu, B32 (2012), 271-278.
    [3] Y. Ohno, Y. Sasaki, Periodicity on poly-Euler numbers and Vandiver type congruence for Euler numbers, RIMS Kokyuroku Bessatsu, B44 (2013), 205-211.
    [4] Y. Ohno, Y. Sasaki, On poly-Euler numbers, J. Aust. Math. Soc., 103 (2017), 126-144. doi: 10.1017/S1446788716000495
    [5] R. B. Corcino, H. Jolany, C. B. Corcino, et al., On generalized multi poly-Euler polynomials, Fibonacci Quart., 55 (2017), 41-53.
    [6] T. Komatsu, J. L. Ramírez, V. Sirvent, A (p, q)-analogue of poly-Euler polynomials and some related polynomials, Ukrainian Math. J., arXiv:1604.03787.
    [7] A. Adelberg, S. F. Hong, W. L. Ren, Bounds of divided universal Bernoulli numbers and universal Kummer congruences, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), 61-71. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-07-09025-9
    [8] S. F. Hong, J. R. Zhao, W. Zhao, The universal Kummer congruences, J. Aust. Math. Soc., 94 (2013), 106-132. doi: 10.1017/S1446788712000493
    [9] A. Hassen, H. D. Nguyen, Hypergeometric Bernoulli polynomials and Appell sequences, Int. J. Number Theory, 4 (2008), 767-774. doi: 10.1142/S1793042108001754
    [10] A. Hassen, H. D. Nguyen, Hypergeometric zeta functions, Int. J. Number Theory, 6 (2010), 99-126. doi: 10.1142/S179304211000282X
    [11] K. Kamano, Sums of products of hypergeometric Bernoulli numbers, J. Number Theory, 130 (2010), 2259-2271. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2010.04.005
    [12] T. Komatsu, Hypergeometric Cauchy numbers, Int. J. Number Theory, 9 (2013), 545-560. doi: 10.1142/S1793042112501473
    [13] T. Komatsu, F. Luca, C. de J. Pita Ruiz V., Generalized poly-Cauchy polynomials and their interpolating functions, Colloq. Math., 136 (2014), 13-30. doi: 10.4064/cm136-1-2
    [14] T. Komatsu, C. de J. Pita Ruiz V., Truncated Euler polynomials, Math. Slovaca, 68 (2018), 52-7-536.
    [15] T. Komatsu, Complementary Euler numbers, Period. Math. Hungar., 75 (2017), 302-314. doi: 10.1007/s10998-017-0199-7
    [16] J. W. L. Glaisher, Expressions for Laplace's coefficients, Bernoullian and Eulerian numbers etc. as determinants, Messenger, 6 (1875), 49-63.
    [17] M. Aoki, T. Komatsu, G. K. Panda, Several properties of hypergeometric Bernoulli numbers, J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, Paper No. 113, 24.
    [18] M. Aoki, T. Komatsu, Remarks on hypergeometric Cauchy numbers, Math. Rep. (Bucur.) (to appear). arXiv:1802.05455.
    [19] O. TeichmÜller, Differentialrechung bei Charakteristik p, J. Reine Angew. Math., 175 (1936), 89-99.
    [20] R. Gottfert, H. Niederreiter, Hasse-Teichmüller derivatives and products of linear recurring sequences, Finite Fields: Theory, Applications, and Algorithms (Las Vegas, NV, 1993), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 168, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994, 117-125.
    [21] H. Hasse, Theorie der höheren Differentiale in einem algebraischen Funktionenkörper mit Vollkommenem Konstantenkörper bei beliebiger Charakteristik, J. Reine Angew. Math., 175 (1936), 50-54.
    [22] N. J. A. Sloane, On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, available from http://oeis.org.
    [23] S. Koumandos, H. Laurberg Pedersen, Turán type inequalities for the partial sums of the generating functions of Bernoulli and Euler numbers, Math. Nachr., 285 (2012), 2129-2156. doi: 10.1002/mana.201100299
    [24] T. Komatsu, J. L. Ramírez, Some determinants involving incomplete Fubini numbers, An. Ştiinţ. Univ. "Ovidius" Constanţa Ser. Mat. 26 (2018), 3, 143-170.
    [25] N. Trudi, Intorno ad alcune formole di sviluppo, Rendic. dell' Accad. Napoli., (1862), 135-143.
    [26] T. Muir, The theory of determinants in the historical order of development, Four volumes, Dover Publications, New York, 1960.
    [27] F. Brioschi, Sulle funzioni Bernoulliane ed Euleriane, Rivista Bibliografica, (2011), 51-117.
    [28] T. Komatsu, V. Laohakosol, P. Tangsupphathawat, Truncated Euler-Carlitz numbers, Hokkaido Math. J., 48 (2019), 569-588. doi: 10.14492/hokmj/1573722018
    [29] T. Komatsu, W. Zhang, Several properties of multiple hypergeometric Euler numbers, Tokyo J. Math. (advance publication). https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.tjm/1552013762.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Takao Komatsu, Two types of hypergeometric degenerate Cauchy numbers, 2020, 18, 2391-5455, 417, 10.1515/math-2020-0030
    2. Takao Komatsu, Continued fraction expansions of the generating functions of Bernoulli and related numbers, 2020, 31, 00193577, 695, 10.1016/j.indag.2020.06.006
    3. Takao Komatsu, Wenpeng Zhang, Several expressions of truncated Bernoulli-Carlitz and truncated Cauchy-Carlitz numbers, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 5939, 10.3934/math.2020380
    4. Takao Komatsu, Ram Krishna Pandey, On hypergeometric Cauchy numbers of higher grade, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 6630, 10.3934/math.2021390
    5. Narakorn Rompurk Kanasri, Takao Komatsu, Vichian Laohakosol, Cameron’s operator in terms of determinants and hypergeometric numbers, 2022, 28, 1405-213X, 10.1007/s40590-021-00401-8
    6. Beáta Bényi, Toshiki Matsusaka, Combinatorial aspects of poly-Bernoulli polynomials and poly-Euler numbers, 2023, 34, 2118-8572, 917, 10.5802/jtnb.1234
    7. James C. Fu, Wan-Chen Lee, Hsing-Ming Chang, On Distribution of the Number of Peaks and the Euler Numbers of Permutations, 2023, 25, 1387-5841, 10.1007/s11009-023-09987-0
    8. Takao Komatsu, Guo-Dong Liu, Congruence properties of Lehmer-Euler numbers, 2025, 0001-9054, 10.1007/s00010-024-01150-5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4095) PDF downloads(359) Cited by(8)

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog