Citation: Atimad Harir, Said Melliani, L. Saadia Chadli. Hybrid fuzzy differential equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 273-285. doi: 10.3934/math.2020018
[1] | Saima Rashid, Sobia Sultana, Bushra Kanwal, Fahd Jarad, Aasma Khalid . Fuzzy fractional estimates of Swift-Hohenberg model obtained using the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16067-16101. doi: 10.3934/math.2022880 |
[2] | Li Chen, Suyun Wang, Yongjun Li, Jinying Wei . New results for fractional ordinary differential equations in fuzzy metric space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 13861-13873. doi: 10.3934/math.2024674 |
[3] | Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Khadijah M. Abualnaja . On fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation associated with Hilfer-generalized proportional fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10920-10946. doi: 10.3934/math.2021635 |
[4] | Yu-ting Wu, Heng-you Lan, Chang-jiang Liu . On implicit coupled systems of fuzzy fractional delay differential equations with triangular fuzzy functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3741-3760. doi: 10.3934/math.2021222 |
[5] | Huichol Choi, Kinam Sin, Sunae Pak, Kyongjin Sok, Sungryol So . Representation of solution of initial value problem for fuzzy linear multi-term fractional differential equation with continuous variable coefficient. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 613-625. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.613 |
[6] | Zhenyu Jin, Jianrong Wu . On the Ulam stability of fuzzy differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6006-6019. doi: 10.3934/math.2020384 |
[7] | Qianhong Zhang, Ouyang Miao, Fubiao Lin, Zhongni Zhang . On discrete-time laser model with fuzzy environment. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3105-3120. doi: 10.3934/math.2021188 |
[8] | Nurain Zulaikha Husin, Muhammad Zaini Ahmad . Hybridization of the shooting and Runge-Kutta Cash-Karp methods for solving Fuzzy Boundary Value Problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31806-31847. doi: 10.3934/math.20241529 |
[9] | M. R. Nourizadeh, N. Mikaeilvand, T. Allahviranloo . Existence and uniqueness solutions of fuzzy integration-differential mathematical problem by using the concept of generalized differentiability. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1430-1449. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1430 |
[10] | Muhammad Akram, Ghulam Muhammad, Tofigh Allahviranloo, Ghada Ali . A solving method for two-dimensional homogeneous system of fuzzy fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 228-263. doi: 10.3934/math.2023011 |
In recent years, quadratic perturbations of nonlinear differential equations have attracted much attention. We call such differential equations hybrid differential equations. There have been many works on the theory of hybrid differential equations, and we refer the readers to the articles [6,7,8]. Dhage and Lakshmikantham [7] discussed the following first order hybrid differential equation
{ddt[u(t)f(t,u(t))]=g(t,u(t)) t∈Ju(t0)=u0∈R |
where, f∈C(J×R,R∖{0}) and g∈C(J×R,R) They established the existence results and some fundamental differential inequalities for hybrid differential equations initiating the study of theory of such systems and proved utilizing the theory of inequalities, its existence of extremal solutions and a comparison result.
From the above works, we develop the theory of hybrid differential equations with fuzzy initial condition [2,3,4] involving their compact and convex level-cuts and generated division.
As we can see, a key point in our investigation is played by the division concepts for fuzzy numbers. A recent very promising concept, the G-division proposed by [14] is studied here in detail. We observe that this division has a great advantage over peer concepts, namely that it always exists. We obtain relatively simple expressions, a minimality property and a characterization for the G-division.
It is well-known that the usual division between two fuzzy numbers exists only under very restrictive conditions [11]. The g-division (introduced in [14]) of two fuzzy numbers exists under much less restrictive conditions, however it does not always exist [14]. The G-division proposed in [14] overcomes these shortcomings of the above discussed concepts and the G-division of two fuzzy numbers always exists.
In this section, we introduce notations, definitions, and preliminary facts which are used throughout this paper.
Let us denote by RF={u:R→[0,1]} the class of fuzzy subsets of the real axis satisfying the following properties [10]:
(ⅰ) u is normal i.e., there exists an x0∈R such that u(x0)=1,
(ⅱ) u is fuzzy convex i.e., for x,y∈R and 0<λ≤1,
u(λx+(1−λ)y)≥min[u(x),u(y)] |
(ⅲ) u is upper semicontinuous,
(ⅳ) [u]0=cl{x∈R|u(x)>0} is compact.
Then RF is called the space of fuzzy numbers. Obviously, R⊂RF. For 0<α≤1 denote [u]α={x∈R|u(x)≥α}, then from (i) to (iv) it follows that the α-cuts sets [u]α∈PK(R) for all 0≤α≤1 is a closed bounded interval which we denote by [u]α=[uα1,uα2].
Where PK(R) denote the family of all nonempty compact convex subsets of R and define the addition and scalar multiplication in PK(R) as usual. The property of the fuzzy numbers is that the α-cuts [u]α are closed sets for all α∈[0,1].
Definition 1. [10,12] We represent an arbitrary fuzzy number by an ordered pair of functions [u]α=[uα1,uα2],α∈[0,1] which satisfy the following requirements:
(a) uα1 is abounded monotonic nondecreasing left-continuous function ∀α∈]0,1], and right-continuous for α=0
(b) uα2 is abounded monotonic nonincreasing left-continuous function ∀α∈]0,1], and right-continuous for α=0
(c) uα1≤uα2, 0≤α≤1
Theorem 1. [10] Let u∈RF and denote Cα=[u]α for α∈[0,1]. Then
1. Cα is a nonempty compact convex set in R for each α∈[0,1]
2. Cβ⊆Cα for 0<α≤β≤1 then
3. Cα=⋂∞i=1Cαi, for any nondecreasing sequence αi→α on [0,1]
A trapezoidal fuzzy number, denoted by u=⟨a,b,c,d⟩, where a≤b≤c≤d, has α-cuts [u]α=[a+α(b−a),d−α(d−c)], α∈[0,1] obtaining a triangular fuzzy number if b=c.
The addition u+v and the scalar multiplication ku are defined as having the level cuts [u+v]α=[u1α+v1α,u2α+v2α]
k[u]α={[kuα1,kuα2]k≥0[kuα2,kuα1]k<0 |
[uv]=[min{uα1.vα1,uα1.vα2,uα2.vα1,uα2.vα2},max{uα1.vα1,uα1.vα2,uα2.vα1,uα2.vα2}] |
[u÷v]α=[min{uα1vα1,uα1vα2,uα2vα1,uα2vα2},max{uα1vα1,uα1vα2,uα2vα1,uα2vα2}] |
For a real interval J=[0,T], a mapping u:J→RF is called a fuzzy function. We denote [u(t)]α=[uα1(t),uα2(t)], for t∈J and α∈[0,1]. the derivative u′(t) of a fuzzy function u is defined by [13]
[u′(t)]α=[(uα1)′(t),(uα2)′(t)] |
The integral ∫bau(t)dt, a,b∈J, is defined by [9]
[∫bau(t)dt]α=[∫bauα1(t)dt,∫bauα2(t)dt] |
provided that the Lebesgue integrals on the right exist.
Definition 2. Given two fuzzy numbers u,v∈RF the generalized division (g-division for short) is the fuzzy number w, if it exists, such that
[u]α÷g[v]α=[w]α⇔{ (i)[u]α=[v]α[w]αor (ii)[v]α=[u]α([w]α)−1 | (3.1) |
here ([w]α)−1=[1/wα2,1/wα1]
provided that w is a proper fuzzy number, where the multiplications between intervals are performed in the standard interval arithmetic setting.
The fuzzy g-division ÷g is well defined if the α-cuts [w]α are such that w∈RF (wα1 is nondecreasing, wα2 nonincreasing, w11≤w12).
Clearly, if u÷gv∈RF exists, it has the properties already illustrated for the interval case.
Proposition 1. [14] Let u,v∈RF (here 1 is the same as {1}). We have:
1. if 0∉[u]α ∀α, then u÷gu=1,
2. if 0∉[v]α ∀α, then uv÷gv=u,
3. if 0∉[v]α ∀α, then 1÷gv=v−1 and 1÷gv−1=v
4. if v÷gu exists then either u(v÷gu)=v or u(v÷gu)−1=u and both equalities hold if and only if v÷gu is crisp
It is easy to see that if w=u÷gv exists according to case (i) then also z=u⊘v of [1] exists and w=z; but the existence of v÷gu according to case (ii) is not al lowed for u⊘v.
In the fuzzy case, it is possible that the g-division of two fuzzy numbers does not exist. For example we can consider a triangular fuzzy number u=(1,1.5,5) and v=(−4,−2,−1) level-wise, the g-divisions exist but the resulting intervals are not the α-cuts of a fuzzy number.
To solve this shortcoming, in [14] a new division between fuzzy numbers was proposed, a division that always exists.
Definition 3. The generalized division (G-division for short ) of two fuzzy numbers u,v∈RF and 0∉[v]α ∀α∈[0,1], is given by its level sets as
[u÷Gv]α=cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β),∀α∈[0,1] | (3.2) |
where the g-division ÷g is with interval operands [u]β and [v]β.
Remark 1. ● By [14] the g-division exist but the resulting intervals are not the α-cuts of fuzzy number, applying G-division (3.2) we obtain the fuzzy number.
● w=u÷Gv can be considered as a generalized division of fuzzy numbers, existing for any u,v with 0∉[v]α for all α∈[0,1].
● If A is G-division, then is Gi-division (g-division satisfies (i)) or is Gii-division (g-division satisfies (ii)).
Proposition 2. The G-division (3.2) is given by the expression
[u÷Gv]α=[infβ≥αmin{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2},supβ≥αmax{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}]. | (3.3) |
Proof. Let α∈[0,1] be fixed. We observe that for any β≥α, 0∉[v01,v02] we have
[u]β÷g[v]β=[min{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2},max{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}]⊆[infλ≥βmin{uλ1vλ1,uλ1vλ2,uλ2vλ1,uλ2vλ2},supλ≥βmax{uλ1vλ1,uλ1vλ2,uλ2vλ1,uλ2vλ2}] |
and it follows that
cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β)⊆[infβ≥αmin{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2},supβ≥αmax{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}]. |
Let us consider now
cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β)=cl⋃β≥α[min{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2},max{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}]. |
For any n≥1, there exist an∈{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2|β≥α} such that
infβ≥αmin{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}>an−1n |
Also there exist bn∈{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2|β≥α} such that
supβ≥αmax{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}<bn+1n |
We have [an,bn]⊆cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β),∀n≥1 and we obtain
(limn→∞an,limn→∞bn)⊆⋃n≥1[an,bn]⊆cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β) |
and finally
[infβ≥αmin{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2},supβ≥αmax{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}]⊆cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β) |
The conclusion
[infβ≥αmin{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2},supβ≥αmax{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}]=cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β) |
of the proposition follows.
The following proposition gives a simplified notation for u÷Gv and v÷Gu.
Proposition 3. For any two fuzzy numbers u,v∈RF the two G-divisions u÷Gv and v÷Gu exist and, for any α∈[0,1], we have u÷Gv=(v÷Gu)−1 with 0∉[v]β, 0∉[u]β and
[u÷Gv]α=[dα1,dα2]and[v÷gu]α=[1dα2,1dα1] |
where
d1α=inf(Dα)d2α=sup(Dα) |
and the sets Dα are
Dα={uβ1vβ1|β≥α}∪{uβ1vβ2|β≥α}∪{uβ2vβ1|β≥α}∪{uβ2vβ2|β≥α}. | (3.4) |
Proof. Consider a fixed α∈[0,1]. Clearly, using Proposition (3.2)
[u÷Gv]α=[infβ≥αmin{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2},supβ≥αmax{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}]⊆[inf(Dα),sup(Dα)]=[dα1,dα2] |
Vice versa, for all n≥1 and from the definition of dα1 and dα2 there exist an,bn∈Dα such that
dα1≤an<dα1+1n,dα2−1n<bn≤dα2 |
and the following limits exist:
liman=dα1,limbn=dα2, |
on the other hand, [ [an,bn]⊆cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β),∀n≥1 and then
⋃n≥1[an,bn]⊆cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β) |
It follows that
[dα1,dα2]=[liman,limbn]⊆⋃n≥1[an,bn]⊆cl⋃β≥α([u]β÷g[v]β) |
and the proof is complete.
Remark 2. We observe that there are other possible different expressions for the G-division as e.g.,
[u÷Gv]α=[min{infβ≥α(uβ1vβ1),infβ≥α(uβ1vβ2),infβ≥α(uβ2vβ1),infβ≥α(uβ2vβ2)},max{supβ≥α(uβ1vβ1),supβ≥α(uβ1vβ2),supβ≥α(uβ2vβ1),supβ≥α(uβ2vβ2)}]. |
The next proposition shows that the G-division is well defined for any two fuzzy numbers u,v∈RF.
Proposition 4. [14] For any fuzzy numbers u,v∈RF,0∉[v01,v02] the G-division u÷Gv exists and it is a fuzzy number.
Proof. We regard the fuzzy quantity u÷Gv Then according to the previous result, if we denote w1=(u÷Gv)1 and w2=(u÷Gv)2 with 0∉[v]α, ∀α∈[0,1] we have
wα1=infβ≥αmin{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2}≤wα2=supβ≥αmax{uβ1vβ1,uβ1vβ2,uβ2vβ1,uβ2vβ2} |
Obviously w1 is bounded and decreasing inverse while w2 is bounded. Also w1,w2 are left continuous on (0,1], since u1v1,u1v2,u2v1,u2v2 are left continuous on (0,1] and they are right continuous at 0 since so are the functions u1v1,u1v2,u2v1,u2v2
Proposition 5. Let u,v∈RF (here 1 is the same as {1}). We have:
1. u÷Gv=u÷gv, if 0∉[v]α ∀α∈[0,1] whenever the expression on the right exists; in particular u÷Gu=1 if 0∉[u]α ∀α
2. (uv)÷Gv=u,
3. 1÷Gv=v−1 and 1÷Gv−1=v
4. if 0∉[u]α and 0∉[v]α ∀α∈[0,1] then 1÷g(v÷gu)=u÷gv
5. v÷Gu=u÷Gv=w if and only if w=w−1, furthermore, w=1 if and only if u=v.
Proof. The proof of (1) is immediate.
For (2) we can use (1), Indeed in this case uv÷gu existe and we have
uv÷Gv=uv÷gv=u |
The proof of (3) is immediate.
The proof of (4) follows from(3.4) for all α∈[0,1]
[1÷g(v÷gu)]α=[1,1]÷g[dα1,dα2]=[min{1dα1,1dα2},max{1dα1,1dα2}]=[1dα2,1dα1]=[1/max{vα1uα1,vα1uα2,vβ2uα1,vα2uα2},1/min{vα1uα1,vα1uα2,vα2uα1,vβ2uα2}]=[min{uα1vα1,uα1vα2,uα2vα1,uα2vα2},max{uα1vα1,uα1vα2,uα2vα1,uα2vα2}]=[u÷gv]α |
To prove(5), consider again (3.4); for all α∈[0,1] we have [w]α=[v÷Gu]α=[dα1,dα2] and [w]α=[u÷Gv]α=[1dα2,1dα1] so that w=w−1 and vice versa, the last part of (5) follows from the last part of (1) and the fact that w=w−1=1 if and only if dα1=dα2 for all α∈[0,1] this is true if and only if uα1vα1=1 and uα2vα2=1 i. e., uα1=vα1 and uα2=vα2 for all α∈[0,1].
Were call the result which establishes the existence of solution for first order hybrid differential equation (in short HDE) with initial condition. This result will be useful in the study of the corresponding fuzzy problem.
We consider the initial value problem
{ddt[u(t)f(t,u(t))]=g(t,u(t)) t∈Ju(t0)=u0∈R | (4.1) |
where, f∈C(J×R,R∖{0}) and g∈C(J×R,R).
By a solution of the HDE (4.1) we mean a function u∈AC(J,R) such that
(ⅰ) the function t↦uf(t,u) is absolutely continuous for each u∈R, and
(ⅱ) u satisfies the equations in (4.1),
where AC(J,R) is the space of absolutely continuous real-valued functions defined on J=[0,T].
Theorem 2. [5] Let S be a non-empty, closed convex and bounded subset of the Banach algebra X and let A:X→X and B:S→X be two operators such that
(a) A is D-Lipschitz with D-function ψ,
(b) B is completely continuous,
(c) x=AxBy⇒x∈S for all y∈S, and
(d) Mψ(r)<r, where M=‖B(S)‖=sup{‖Bx‖:x∈S}.
Then the operator equation AxBx=x has a solution in S.
We consider the following hypotheses in what follows.
(A0) The function x↦xf(t,x) is increasing in R almost everywhere for t∈J.
(A1) There exists a constant L>0 such that
∣f(t,x)−f(t,y)∣≤L∣x−y∣ | (4.2) |
for all t∈J and x,y∈R.
(A2) There exists a function h∈L1(J,R) such that
∣g(t,x)∣≤h(t) t∈J |
In the following section, we consider a fuzzy differential equation which is a fuzzy analogue to (4.1).
We shall consider the initial value problem,
ddt[u(t)f(t,u(t))]=g(t,u(t)) t∈Ju(0)=u0∈RF | (5.1) |
The extension principle of Zadeh leads to the following definition of f(t,u) and g(t,u) when are a fuzzy numbers
f(t,u)(y)=sup{u(x):y=f(t,x),x∈R,g(t,u)(y)=sup{u(x):y=g(t,x),x∈R. |
It follows that
[f(t,u)]α=[min{f(t,x):x∈[uα1,uα2]}, max{f(t,x):x∈[uα1,uα2]}],[g(t,u)]α=[min{g(t,x):x∈[uα1,uα2]}, max{g(t,x):x∈[uα1,uα2]}] |
for u∈RF with α-level sets [u]α=[uα1,uα2], 0<α≤1. We call u:J→RF a fuzzy solution of (5.1), if
[ddt[u(t)÷Gf(t,u(t))]]α=[g(t,u(t))]α and [u(0)]α=[u0]α | (5.2) |
for all t∈J and α∈[0,1]. Denote ˜f=(f1,f2) and ˜g=(g1,g2),
f1(t,u)=min{f(t,x):x∈[u1,u2]}, f2(t,u)=max{f(t,x):x∈[u1,u2]} andg1(t,u)=min{g(t,x):x∈[u1,u2]}, g2(t,u)=max{g(t,x):x∈[u1,u2]} (resp), |
where u=(u1,u2)∈R2. Thus for fixed α we have an initial value problem in R2
ddt[uα1(t)˜f(t,uα1(t),uα2(t))]=˜g(t,uα1(t),uα2(t))uα1(0)=uα01andddt[uα2(t)˜f(t,uα1(t),uα2(t))]=˜g(t,uα1(t),uα2(t))uα2(0)=uα02 | (5.3) |
If we can solve it (uniquely) we have only to verify that the intervals [uα1(t),uα2(t)], α∈[0,1], define a fuzzy number u(t) in RF. see [2,3,4]. Since f and g are assumed continue and Caratheodory (resp), the initial value problem (5.3) is equivalent to the following nonlinear hybrid integral equation (HIE)
u(t)=˜f(t,u(t))(u0˜f(0,u(0))+∫t0˜g(s,u(s))ds) | (5.4) |
Theorem 3. Assume sign(u(0))=sign(u(t)), for all t∈J,
let z(t)=u÷Gf(t,u(t)) and 0∉[f(t,u)]α α∈[0,1] and
r(t)=f(t,u(t))÷G(z(0)+∫t0g(s,u(s))ds),0∉[z(0)+∫t0g(s,u(s))]α |
1. If z(0)∗g(t,u)>0 then the function u(t)∈AC((0,T],RF) is a fuzzy solution of (5.1)
● If z(t) is Gi-division
● or z(t) is Gi-division and r(t) is Gi-division
2. Or if z(t) is Gi-division and zα1(0)≤0≤zα2(0) then u(t) is a fuzzy solution.
Proof. We solve initial value problem in R2
ddtzα1=min{g(t,x):x∈[uα1(t),uα2(t)]}, uα1(0)=uα01ddtzα2=max{g(t,x):x∈[uα1(t),uα2(t)]}, uα2(0)=uα02 | (5.5) |
Step 1 :
It can be assume that (4.2) implies
‖f(t,x)−f(t,y)‖≤L‖x−y‖,for all t∈J,x,y∈R | (5.6) |
where the ‖.‖ is defined by ‖u‖=max{|u1|,|u2|. It is well known that (5.6) and the assumptions on g Theorem 2 guarantee the existence and continuous dependence on initial of a solution to
{ddt[u(t)˜f(t,u(t))]=˜g(t,u(t)),u(0)=u0 | (5.7) |
and that for any continuous function u0∈R2 we have (5.4).
By choosing u0=(uα01,uα02) in (5.7) we get a solution uα(t)=(uα1(t),uα2(t)) to (4.2) for all α∈(0,1].
Step 2 :
We will show that the intervals [uα1(t),uα2(t)], α∈[0,1], define a fuzzy number u(t)∈RF. For simplicity assume [u(0)]α≤0, [f(t,u(t))]α>0 and [g(t,u(t))]α<0 for all α∈[0,1] (The proof for other cases is similar and omitted), then wa have tow cases.
Case Ⅰ:
By Eq. (5.3), we have the two following HDE with initial conditions
{ddt[uα1(t)fα2(t,u(t))]=gα1(t,u(t))uα1(0)=uα01 | (5.8) |
and
{ddt[uα2(t)fα1(t,u(t))]=gα2(t,u(t))uα2(0)=uα02 | (5.9) |
In consequence by Step 1, we deduce that, for every α∈[0,1], the solution to problems (5.8)–(5.9) are respectively
uα1(t)=fα2(t,u(t))[uα1(0)fα2(0,u(0))+∫t0gα2(s,u(s))ds]uα2(t)=fα1(t,u(t))[uα2(0)fα1(0,u(0))+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds] |
We check that {[uα1(t),uα2(t)], α∈[0,1]} represent the level set of a fuzzy set u(t) in RF, for each t∈J fixed, by applying the stacking Theorem 1. Indeed, we fix t∈J and check the validity of the three conditions.
(1): First, we check that uα1(t)≤uα2(t), for every α∈[0,1] and t∈J, Indeed, for each α∈[0,1] and t∈J we have that fα1(t,u(t))≤fα2(t,u(t)) and
uα1(0)fα2(0,u(0))+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds≤uα2(0)fα1(0,u(0))+∫t0gα2(s,u(s))ds |
and by classical arithmetic we have
uα1(t)=fα2(t,u(t))[uα1(0)fα2(0,u(0))+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds]≤fα1(t,u(t))[uα2(0)fα1(0,u(0))+∫t0gα2(s,u(s))ds]=uα2(t) |
(2): Let 0≤α≤β≤1. Since u0∈RF, we have that fβ2(t,u(t))≤fα2(t,u(t)) and
uα1(0)fα2(0,u(0))+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds≤uβ1(0)fβ2(0,u(0))+∫t0gβ1(s,u(s))ds |
we deduce that
uα1(t)=fα2(t,u(t))[uα1(0)fα2(0,u(0))+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds]≤fβ2(t,u(t))[uβ1(0)fβ2(0,u(0))+∫t0gβ1(s,u(s))ds]=uβ1(t) |
and, similarly, fα1(t,u(t))≤fβ1(t,u(t)) and
uβ2(0)fβ1(0,u(0))+∫t0gβ2(s,u(s))ds≤uα2(0)fα1(0,u(0))+∫t0gα2(s,u(s))ds |
so
uβ2(t)=fβ1(t,u(t))[uβ2(0)fβ1(0,u(0))+∫t0gβ2(s,u(s))ds]≤fα1(t,u(t))[uα2(0)fα1(0,u(0))+∫t0gα2(s,u(s))ds]=uα2(t) |
which proves that [uβ1(t),uβ2(t)]⊆[uα1(t),uα2(t)].
(3): Given a nondecreasing sequence {αi} in (0,1] such that αi↑α∈(0,1], we prove that [uα1(t),uα2(t)]=⋂∞i=1[uαi1(t),uαi2(t)].
Indeed, by the Dominated Convergence Theorem,
limαi↑α∫t0gαi1(s,u(s))=∫t0limαi↑αgαi1(s,u(s))ds=∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds |
and, hence,
limαi↑αuαi1(t)=limαi↑α(fαi2(t,u(t))[uαi1(0)fαi2(0,u(0))+∫t0gαi1(s,u(s))ds])=limαi↑α(fα2(t,u(t))[uα1(0)fα2(0,u(0))+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds])=uα1(t) |
Hence, u(t)∈RF.
Case Ⅱ: By Eq. (5.3), we have the two following HDE with initial conditions
{ddt[uα2(t)fα1(t,u(t))]=gα1(t,u(t))uα2(0)=uα02 | (5.10) |
and
{ddt[uα1(t)fα2(t,u(t))]=gα2(t,u(t))uα1(0)=uα01 | (5.11) |
The solution to problems (5.10)–(5.11) are respectively
uα2(t)=fα1(t,u(t))[uα2(0)fα1(0,u(0))+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds]uα1(t)=fα2(t,u(t))[uα1(0)fα2(0,u(0))+∫t0gα2(s,u(s))ds] |
By applying step 1 and we consider the situation where 0∉[z(0)+∫t0˜g(s,u(s))ds]α,
fα2(t,u(t))z1(0)+∫t0gα1(s,u(s))ds≤fα1(t,u(t))z2(0)+∫t0gα2(s,u(s))ds | (5.12) |
i.e., (uα1(t)≤uα2(t)) similarly by applying theorem 1 the details for the case I are analogous, and if the situation (5.12) does not hold i.e., (uα2(t)≤uα1(t)), then by theorem 1, u(t) is not a fuzzy solution of (5.7).
We have investigated generalized division concepts for fuzzy number. The G-division introduced here is a very general division concept, being also practically applicable. Developed the theory of hybrid differential equation with fuzzy condition involving their compact and convex level-cuts. The next step in the research direction proposed here is to investigate hybrid fuzzy fractional differential equations with G-division and applications.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | R. Boukezzoula, S. Galichet, L. Foulloy, Inverse arithmetic operators for fuzzy intervals, In: Proc. EUSFLAT 2007 Conf., Ostrawa, 279-286. |
[2] | L. S. Chadli, A. Harir, S. Melliani, Fuzzy Euler differential equation, SOP Trans. Appl. Math., 2 (2015). |
[3] | L. S. Chadli, A. Harir, S. Melliani, Solutions of fuzzy heat-like equations by variational iterative method, Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inf., 10 (2015), 29-44. |
[4] | L. S. Chadli, A. Harir, S. Melliani, Solutions of fuzzy wave-like equations by variational iteration method, Int. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inf., 8 (2014), 527-547. |
[5] | B. C. Dhage, D. O'Regan, A fixed point theorem in Banach algebras with applications to functional integral equations, Funct. Differ. Eq., 7 (2004), 259-267. |
[6] | B. C. Dhage, On α-condensing mappings in Banach algebras, Math. Student, 63 (1994), 146-152. |
[7] |
B. C. Dhage, V. Lakshmikantham, Basic results on hybrid differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid syst., 4 (2010), 414-424. doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.10.005
![]() |
[8] | B. C. Dhage, A nonlinear alternative in Banach algebras with applications to functional differential equations, Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl., 8 (2004), 563-575. |
[9] |
D. Qiu, C. Lu, W. Hhang, et al. Algebraic properties and topological properties of the quotient space of fuzzy numbers based on Mares equivalence relation, Fuzzy set. Syst., 245 (2014), 63-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.01.003
![]() |
[10] |
D. Qiu, W. Hhang, C. Lu, On fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy set. Syst., 295 (2016), 72-98. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2015.03.010
![]() |
[11] |
O. Kaleva, Fuzzy differential equations, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 24 (1987), 301-317. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90029-7
![]() |
[12] |
M. Ma, M. Friedman, A. Kandel, A new fuzzy arithmetic, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 108 (1999), 83-90. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00310-2
![]() |
[13] |
S. Seikkala, On the fuzzy initialvalue problem, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 24 (1987), 319-330. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90030-3
![]() |
[14] |
L. Stefanini, Ageneralization of Hukuhara difference and division for interval and fuzzy arithmetic, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 161 (2010), 1564-1584. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2009.06.009
![]() |