Research article Special Issues

Evaluation of nanostructured electrode materials for high-performance supercapacitors using multiple-criteria decision-making approach

  • Received: 18 December 2022 Revised: 04 February 2023 Accepted: 12 February 2023 Published: 24 February 2023
  • The enhancement of electrode materials' properties for improving mercantile supercapacitors' performances is a remarkable research area. Throughout recent years, a significant amount of research has been devoted to improving the electrochemical performance of supercapacitors via the improvement of novel electrode materials. The nanocomposite structure provides a greater specific surface area (SSA) and lower ion/electron diffusion tracks, consequently enhancing supercapacitors' energy density and specific capacitance. These significant properties offer a wide range of potential for the electrode materials to be applied in diverse applications. For instance, their applications are in portable electronic systems such as all-solid-state supercapacitors, flexible/transparent supercapacitors and hybrid supercapacitors. The authors of this paper introduced a multi-criteria model to assess the priority of nanostructured electrode materials (NEMs) for high-performance supercapacitors (HPSCs). This work combines Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) methods. Herein, the rough concept addresses the uncertainties resulting from the group decision-making process and the vague values of the properties of the NEMs. The modified R-AHP method was employed to find the criteria weights based on the multi-experts' opinions. The results reveal that specific capacitance (SC) and energy density (ED) are the most important criteria. R-AHP was integrated with R-EDAS and R-GRA models to evaluate the fourteen NEMs. The results of the R-EDAS method were compared with those provided by the R-GRA method. The results of the proposed integrated approach confirmed that it results in reliable and reputable ranks that will provide a framework for further applications and help physicists find optimal materials by evaluating various alternatives.

    Citation: Ibrahim M. Hezam, Aref M. Al-Syadi, Abdelaziz Foul, Ahmad Alshamrani, Jeonghwan Gwak. Evaluation of nanostructured electrode materials for high-performance supercapacitors using multiple-criteria decision-making approach[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(4): 2286-2314. doi: 10.3934/era.2023117

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ashish Awasthi, Riyasudheen TK . An accurate solution for the generalized Black-Scholes equations governing option pricing. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2226-2243. doi: 10.3934/math.2020147
    [2] Jafar Biazar, Fereshteh Goldoust . Multi-dimensional Legendre wavelets approach on the Black-Scholes and Heston Cox Ingersoll Ross equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(4): 1046-1064. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.4.1046
    [3] Azadeh Ghanadian, Taher Lotfi . Approximate solution of nonlinear Black–Scholes equation via a fully discretized fourth-order method. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 879-893. doi: 10.3934/math.2020060
    [4] Abdulghani R. Alharbi . Traveling-wave and numerical solutions to nonlinear evolution equations via modern computational techniques. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1323-1345. doi: 10.3934/math.2024065
    [5] Ajmal Ali, Tayyaba Akram, Azhar Iqbal, Poom Kumam, Thana Sutthibutpong . A numerical approach for 2D time-fractional diffusion damped wave model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8249-8273. doi: 10.3934/math.2023416
    [6] Zhongdi Cen, Jian Huang, Aimin Xu . A posteriori grid method for a time-fractional Black-Scholes equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20962-20978. doi: 10.3934/math.20221148
    [7] Hijaz Ahmad, Muhammad Nawaz Khan, Imtiaz Ahmad, Mohamed Omri, Maged F. Alotaibi . A meshless method for numerical solutions of linear and nonlinear time-fractional Black-Scholes models. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19677-19698. doi: 10.3934/math.20231003
    [8] Min-Ku Lee, Jeong-Hoon Kim . Closed-form approximate solutions for stop-loss and Russian options with multiscale stochastic volatility. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 25164-25194. doi: 10.3934/math.20231284
    [9] Yuelong Tang . Error estimates of mixed finite elements combined with Crank-Nicolson scheme for parabolic control problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 12506-12519. doi: 10.3934/math.2023628
    [10] M. Hamid, T. Zubair, M. Usman, R. U. Haq . Numerical investigation of fractional-order unsteady natural convective radiating flow of nanofluid in a vertical channel. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1416-1429. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1416
  • The enhancement of electrode materials' properties for improving mercantile supercapacitors' performances is a remarkable research area. Throughout recent years, a significant amount of research has been devoted to improving the electrochemical performance of supercapacitors via the improvement of novel electrode materials. The nanocomposite structure provides a greater specific surface area (SSA) and lower ion/electron diffusion tracks, consequently enhancing supercapacitors' energy density and specific capacitance. These significant properties offer a wide range of potential for the electrode materials to be applied in diverse applications. For instance, their applications are in portable electronic systems such as all-solid-state supercapacitors, flexible/transparent supercapacitors and hybrid supercapacitors. The authors of this paper introduced a multi-criteria model to assess the priority of nanostructured electrode materials (NEMs) for high-performance supercapacitors (HPSCs). This work combines Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) methods. Herein, the rough concept addresses the uncertainties resulting from the group decision-making process and the vague values of the properties of the NEMs. The modified R-AHP method was employed to find the criteria weights based on the multi-experts' opinions. The results reveal that specific capacitance (SC) and energy density (ED) are the most important criteria. R-AHP was integrated with R-EDAS and R-GRA models to evaluate the fourteen NEMs. The results of the R-EDAS method were compared with those provided by the R-GRA method. The results of the proposed integrated approach confirmed that it results in reliable and reputable ranks that will provide a framework for further applications and help physicists find optimal materials by evaluating various alternatives.



    In 1982, Hamilton first introduced the Ricci soliton (RS) concept with [1], and Hamilton pointed out the RS serves as a self-similar outcome to the Ricci flow as long as it walks through a one single parameter family with modulo diffeomorphic mappings and grows on a space about Riemannian metrics in [2]. Since then, geometers and physicists turned their attention to discuss RS. For example, in [3], Rovenski found conditions for the existence of an Einstein manifold according to a similar Ricci tensor or generalized RS form in an extremely weak κ-contact manifold. In [4], Arfah presented a condition for RS on semi-Riemannian group manifold and illustrated the applications of group manifold that admit RS. There are some typical works on affine RS [5], algebraic RS [6], as well as generalized RS [7]. Nonetheless, a task about seeking out RS on manifolds is considerably challenging and often necessitates the imposition of limitations. These restrictions can typically be observed in several areas, such as the framework and dimensions of the manifold, the classification of metrics or the classification about vector fields used in the RS equation. An example of this is the utilization of homogeneous spaces, particularly Lie groups (LG) [8]. Following this, several mathematicians delved into the study of algebraic RS on LG, the area that had previously been explored by Lauret. During his research, he investigated the correlation between solvsolitons solitons and RS regarding Riemannian manifolds, ultimately proving that every Riemannian solvsoliton metric constitutes the RS in [9]. With these findings as a foundation, the author was able to derive both steady algebraic RS and diminishing algebraic RS in terms of Lorentzian geometries. It should be noted that Batat together with Onda subsequently investigated RS for three-dimensional Lorentzian Lie groups (LLG) in [10], examining all such Lie groups that qualify as algebraic RS. Furthermore, there also have been certain studies on the LG about Gauss Bonnet theorems in [11,12].

    Motivated by the above research, mathematicians undertook an investigation of algebraic RS that are associated with different affine connections. For example, in [13], Wang presented a novel product structure for three-dimensional LLG, along with a computation for canonical and Kobayashi-Nomizu connections as well as curvature tensor. He went ahead to define algebraic RSs that are related to the above statements. Furthermore, he categorized the algebraic RSs that are related to canonical as well as Kobayashi-Nomizu connections with this specific product structure. Wang also considered the distribution H=span{˜qY1,˜qY2} and its orthogonal complement H=span{˜qY3}, which are relevant to the three-dimensional LLG having a structure J:J˜qY1=˜qY1, J˜qY2=˜qY2 and J˜qY3=˜qY3. Moreover, other impressive results of RS are found in [14,15,16]. In [17], Calvaruso performed an in-depth analysis of three-dimensional generalized Rs with regards to Riemannian and Lorentzian frameworks. In order to study the properties associated with such solitons, they introduced a generalized RS in Eq. (1) [18] that can be regarded as the Schouten soliton, based on the Schouten tensor's definition mentioned in [19]. Drawing upon the works of [20], they also defined algebraic Schouten solitons(ASS). Moreover, the study in [21] introduced the concept of Yano connections (YC). Despite the substantial research on ASS, there is limited knowledge about their association with YC on LLG. Inspired by [22], and many studies provide extra incentives for solitons, see [23,24,25,26]. In this paper, we attempt to examine ASS associated with YC in the context of three-dimensional LG. The key to solving this problem is to find the existence conditions of ASS associated with YC. Based on this, by transforming equations of ASS into algebraic equations, the existence conditions of solitons are found. In particular, we calculate the curvature of YC and derive expressions for ASS to finish their categorization for three-dimensional LLG. Its main results demonstrate that ASS related to YC are present in G1, G2, G3, G5, G6 and G7, while they are not identifiable in G4.

    The paper is structured as follows. In Sec 2, fundamental concepts for three-dimensional LLG, specifically relating to YC as well ASS, will be introduced. Additionally, we present a succinct depiction of each three-dimensional connected LG, which is both unimodular and non-unimodular. In Sec 3, we obtain all formulas for YC as well their corresponding curvatures tensor in seven LLG. Using this Ricci operator and defining ASS associated to YC, we are able to fully classify three-dimensional LLG that admit the first kind ASS related to YC. In Sec 4, we use this soliton equation in an effort to finish a categorization about three-dimensional LLG that support ASS of the second kind related to YC. In Sec 5, we highlight certain important findings and talk about potential directions regarding research.

    In this section, fundamental concepts for three-dimensional LLG, specifically relating to YC as well ASS, will be introduced. Additionally, we present a succinct depiction of each three-dimensional connected LG, which is both unimodular and non-unimodular (for details see [27,28]).

    We designate {Gi}i=1,,7 as the collection for three-dimensional LLG, which is connected and simply connected, endowed with left-invariant Lorentzian metric gY. Furthermore, the respective Lie algebra(LA) for each group is denoted as {gYi}i=1,,7. The LCC will get represented by L. This is the definition of the YC:

    YUYVY=LUYVY12(LVYJ)JUY14[(LUYJ)JVY(LJUYJ)VY], (2.1)

    furthermore, {Gi}i=1,,7 having a structure J:J˜qY1=˜qY1, J˜qY2=˜qY2, J˜qY3=˜qY3, followed J2=id, then gY(J˜qYj,J˜qYj)=gY(˜qYj,˜qYj). This is the definitions of the curvature:

    RY(UY,VY)WY=YUYYVYWYYVYYUYWYY[UY,VY]WY. (2.2)

    This definition of the Ricci tensor for (Gi,gY), which is related to the YC, can be given as

    ρY(UY,VY)=gY(RY(UY,˜qY1)VY,˜qY1)gY(RY(UY,˜qY2)VY,˜qY2)+gY(RY(UY,˜qY3)VY,˜qY3), (2.3)

    the basis ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 is pseudo-orthonormal, ˜qY3 is timelike vector fields. This definition of the Ricci operator RicY can be given as

    ρY(UY,VY)=gY(RicY(UY),VY). (2.4)

    One can define the Schouten tensor with the expression given by

    SY(˜qYi,˜qYj)=ρY(˜qYi,˜qYj)sY4gY(˜qYi,˜qYj), (2.5)

    where sY represents the scalar curvature. By extending the Schouten tensor's definition, we obtain

    SY(˜qYi,˜qYj)=ρY(˜qYi,˜qYj)sYλ0gY(˜qYi,˜qYj), (2.6)

    where λ0 is a real-valued constant. By referring to [29], we can obtain

    sY=ρY(˜qY1,˜qY1)+ρY(˜qY2,˜qY2)ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3), (2.7)

    for vector fields UY, VY, WY.

    Theorem 2.1. [27,28] Let (G,gY) be three-dimensional LG of connected unimodular that has a left-invariant Lorentzian metric. Thus the LA for G is one of the following if there exists a pseudo-orthonormal basis {˜qY1,˜qY2,˜qY3} with ˜qY3 timelike:

    (gY1):

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=α˜qY1β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=α˜qY1β˜qY2,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=β˜qY1+α˜qY2+α˜qY3,α0.

    (gY2):

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=γ˜qY2β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=β˜qY2γ˜qY3,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=α˜qY1,γ0.

    (gY3):

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=γ˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=β˜qY2,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=α˜qY1.

    (gY4):

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=˜qY2+(2ηβ)˜qY2,η=±1,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=β˜qY2+˜qY3,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=α˜qY1.

    Theorem 2.2. [27,28] Let (G,gY) be three-dimensional LG of connected non-unimodular that has a left-invariant Lorentzian metric. Thus the LA for G is one of the following if there exists a pseudo-orthonormal basis {˜qY1,˜qY2,˜qY3} with ˜qY3 timelike:

    (gY5):

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=0,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=α˜qY1+β˜qY2,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=γ˜qY1+δ˜qY2,α+δ0,αγ+βδ=0.

    (gY6):

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=α˜qY2+β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=γ˜qY2+δ˜qY3,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=0,α+δ0,αγβδ=0.

    (gY7):

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=α˜qY1β˜qY2β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=α˜qY1+β˜qY2+β˜qY3,
    [˜qY2,˜qY3]=γ˜qY1+δ˜qY2+δ˜qY3,α+δ0,αγ=0.

    Definition 2.3. (Gi,gY) is called ASS of the first kind related with YC when it satisfies

    RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, (2.8)

    which c is an actual number, λ0 is a real-valued constant, as well D is derivation for gY, which can be

    D[UY,VY]=[DUY,VY]+[UY,DVY], (2.9)

    for UY,VYgY.

    In this section, we aim to obtain the formulas for YC as well their corresponding curvatures in seven LLGs. Using the Ricci operator and defining LLG associated to YC, we are able to fully classify three-dimensional LLG that admit ASS as the first kind associated with YC.

    In the subsection, we present the LA for G1 that satisfies the following condition

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=α˜qY1β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=α˜qY1β˜qY2,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=β˜qY1+α˜qY2+α˜qY3,α0,

    the basis vectors ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 form a pseudo-orthonormal basis where ˜qY3 is timelike. Four lemmas regarding the formulations of YC as well their corresponding curvatures in G1 with Lorentzian metric can be derived.

    Lemma 3.1 ([10,30]). The LCC for G1 can be given as

    L˜qY1˜qY1=α˜qY2α˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY2=α˜qY1β2˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY3=α˜qY1β2˜qY2,L˜qY2˜qY1=β2˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY2=α˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY3=β2˜qY1+α˜qY2,L˜qY3˜qY1=β2˜qY2, L˜qY3˜qY2=β2˜qY1α˜qY3, L˜qY3˜qY3=α˜qY2.

    Lemma 3.2. For G1, the following equalities hold

    L˜qY1(J)˜qY1=2α˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY2=β˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY3=2α˜qY1+β˜qY2,L˜qY2(J)˜qY1=β˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY2=2α˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY3=β˜qY12˜qY2,L˜qY3(J)˜qY1=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY2=2α˜qY3, L˜qY3(J)˜qY3=2α˜qY2.

    Based on (2.1), as well as Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.3. The YC for G1 can be given as

    Y˜qY1˜qY1=α˜qY2, Y˜qY1˜qY2=α˜qY1β˜qY3, Y˜qY1˜qY3=0,Y˜qY2˜qY1=β˜qY3, Y˜qY2˜qY2=0, Y˜qY2˜qY3=α˜qY3,Y˜qY3˜qY1=α˜qY1+β˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY2=β˜qY1α˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.2), as well as Lemma 3.3, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.4. The curvature RY for (G1,gY) can be given as

    RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY1=αβ˜qY1+(α2+β2)˜qY2, RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY2=(α2+β2)˜qY1αβ˜qY2+αβ˜qY3,RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY3=0, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY1=3α2˜qY2, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY2=α2˜qY1,RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY3=αβ˜qY3, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY1=α2˜qY1, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY2=α2˜qY2,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY3=α2˜qY3.

    Using Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4, the following theorem regarding the ASS of the first kind in the first LG with Lorentzian metric can be established.

    Theorem 3.5. (G1,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC if it satisfies β=c=0, α0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(α2000α2α2000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(α2+2α2λ0000α2+2α2λ0α2002α2λ0)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    Proof. According to (2.3), we have

    ρY(˜qY1,˜qY1)=α2β2, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY2)=αβ, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY3)=αβ,ρY(˜qY2,˜qY1)=αβ, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY2)=(α2+β2), ρY(˜qY2,˜qY3)=α2,ρY(˜qY3,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3)=0.

    By (2.4), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(α2β2αβαβαβα2β2α2000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as sY=2α22β2. If (G1,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC, and by RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, we can get

    {D˜qY1=[α2β2+(2α2+2β2)λ0c]˜qY1+αβ˜qY2+αβ˜qY3,D˜qY2=αβ˜qY1+[α2β2+(2α2+2β2)λ0c]˜qY2α2˜qY3,D˜qY3=[(2α2+2β2)λ0c]˜qY3.

    Therefore, by (2.9) and ASS of the first kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    {2α3λ02αβ2+2αβ2λ0αc=0,α2β=0,β3α2β=0,2β3λ02α2β+2α2βλ0βc=0. (3.1)

    Considering that α0, by solving the first and second equations in (3.1) leads to the conclusion that β=0 and c=0. Thus we get Theorem 3.5.

    In the subsection, we present the LA for G2 that satisfies the following condition

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=γ˜qY2β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=β˜qY2γ˜qY3,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=α˜qY1,γ0,

    the basis vectors ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 form a pseudo-orthonormal basis where ˜qY3 is timelike. Four lemmas regarding the formulations of YC as well their corresponding curvatures in G2 with Lorentzian metric can be derived.

    Lemma 3.6 ([10,30]). The LCC for G2 can be given as

    L˜qY1˜qY1=0, L˜qY1˜qY2=(α2β)˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY3=(α2β)˜qY2,L˜qY2˜qY1=γ˜qY2+α2˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY2=γ˜qY1, L˜qY2˜qY3=α2˜qY1,L˜qY3˜qY1=α2˜qY2+γ˜qY3, L˜qY3˜qY2=α2˜qY1, L˜qY3˜qY3=γ˜qY1.

    Lemma 3.7. For G2, the following equalities hold

    L˜qY1(J)˜qY1=0, L˜qY1(J)˜qY2=(α2β)˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY3=(α2β)˜qY2,L˜qY2(J)˜qY1=α˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY2(J)˜qY3=α˜qY1,L˜qY3(J)˜qY1=2γ˜qY3, L˜qY3(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY3=2γ˜qY1.

    Based on (2.1), as well as Lemmas 3.6 and 3.7, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.8. The YC for G2 can be given as

    Y˜qY1˜qY1=0, Y˜qY1˜qY2=β˜qY3, Y˜qY1˜qY3=2β˜qY2γ˜qY3,Y˜qY2˜qY1=γ˜qY2+β˜qY3, Y˜qY2˜qY2=γ˜qY1, Y˜qY2˜qY3=0,Y˜qY3˜qY1=β˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY2=α˜qY1, Y˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.2), as well as Lemma 3.8, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.9. The curvature RY for (G2,gY) can be given as

    RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY1=(γ2β2)˜qY2βγ˜qY3, RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY2=(γ2+αβ)˜qY1,RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY3=2βγ˜qY1, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY1=0, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY2=(βγαγ)˜qY1,RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY3=2αβ˜qY1, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY1=(βγαγ)˜qY1,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY2=βγ˜qY2+αβ˜qY3, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY3=2αβ˜qY2+αγ˜qY3.

    Using Lemmas 3.8 and 3.9, the following theorem regarding the ASS of the first kind in the second LG with Lorentzian metric can be established.

    Theorem 3.10. (G2,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to YC if it satisfies α=β=0, γ0, c=γ2(2λ01). And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(γ2000γ20000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(00000000γ2)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    Proof. According to (2.3), we have

    ρY(˜qY1,˜qY1)=β2γ2, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY3)=0,ρY(˜qY2,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY2)=γ22αβ, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY3)=2βγαγ,ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY2)=αγ, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3)=0.

    By (2.4), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(β2γ2000γ22αβαγ2βγ0αγ0)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as sY=β22γ22αβ. If (G2,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC, and by RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, we can get

    {D˜qY1=(β2γ2β2λ0+2γ2λ0+2αβλ0c)˜qY1,D˜qY2=(γ22αββ2λ0+2γ2λ0+2αβλ0c)˜qY2+(αγ2βγ)˜qY3,D˜qY3=αγ˜qY2+(β2λ0+2γ2λ0+2αβλ0c)˜qY3.

    Therefore, by (2.9) and ASS of the first kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    {β3β3λ0+2αγ26βγ22αβ2+2βγ2λ0+2αβ2λ0βc=0,β3β3λ0+2αγ2+2αβ2+2βγ2λ0+2αβ2λ0βc=0,γ32γ3λ03β2γ+β2γλ0+2αβγ2αβγλ0+γc=0,αβ22α2βαβ2λ0+2αγ2λ0+2α2βλ0αc=0. (3.2)

    By solving the first and second equations of (3.2) imply that

    2αβ2+3βγ2=0.

    As γ0, it follows that β must be zero. On this basis, the second equation of (3.2) reduces to

    2αγ2=0,

    we have α=0. In this case, the third equation of (3.2) can be simplified to

    γ32γ3λ0+γc=0,

    then we obtain c=γ2(2λ01). Thus we get Theorem 3.10.

    In the subsection, we present the LA for G3 that satisfies the following condition

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=γ˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=β˜qY2,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=α˜qY1,

    the basis vectors ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 form a pseudo-orthonormal basis where ˜qY3 is timelike. Four lemmas regarding the formulations of YC as well their corresponding curvatures in G3 with Lorentzian metric can be derived.

    Lemma 3.11 ([10,30]). The LCC for G3 can be given as

    L˜qY1˜qY1=0, L˜qY1˜qY2=αβγ2˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY3=αβγ2˜qY2,L˜qY2˜qY1=αβ+γ2˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY2=0, L˜qY2˜qY3=αβ+γ2˜qY1,L˜qY3˜qY1=α+βγ2˜qY2, L˜qY3˜qY2=α+βγ2˜qY1, L˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Lemma 3.12. For G3, the following equalities hold

    L˜qY1(J)˜qY1=0, L˜qY1(J)˜qY2=(αβγ)˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY3=(αβγ)˜qY2,L˜qY2(J)˜qY1=(αβ+γ)˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY2(J)˜qY3=(αβ+γ)˜qY1,L˜qY3(J)˜qY1=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.1), as well as Lemmas 3.11 and 3.12, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.13. The YC for G3 can be given as

    Y˜qY1˜qY1=0, Y˜qY1˜qY2=γ˜qY3, Y˜qY1˜qY3=0,Y˜qY2˜qY1=γ˜qY3, Y˜qY2˜qY2=0, Y˜qY2˜qY3=γ˜qY1,Y˜qY3˜qY1=β˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY2=α˜qY1, Y˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.2), as well as Lemma 3.13, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.14. The curvature RY for (G3,gY) can be given as

    RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY1=βγ˜qY2, RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY2=(γ2+αγ)˜qY1, RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY3=0,RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY1=0, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY2=0, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY3=βγ˜qY1,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY1=0, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY2=0, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY3=βγ˜qY2.

    Using Lemmas 3.13 and 3.14, the following theorem regarding the ASS of the first kind in the third LG with Lorentzian metric can be established.

    Theorem 3.15. (G3,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to YC if it satisfies

    (1)α=β=γ=0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(c000c000c)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    (2)α=β=0, γ0, c=γ2λ0γ2. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(0000γ20000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(γ20000000γ2)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    (3)γ=c=0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    (4)β=0, α0, γ0, γ3γ3λ0α2γ+α2γλ0+γcαc=0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(0000γ2αγ0000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(γ2λ0+αγλ0c000γ2+γ2λ0αγ+αγλ0c000γ2λ0+αγλ0c)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    (5)α=0, β0, γ0, γ3γ3λ02βγ2λ0+β2γβ2γλ0+γcβc=0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(βγ000γ20000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(γ2λ0βγ+βγλ0c000γ2+γ2λ0+βγλ0c000γ2λ0+βγλ0c)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    Proof. According to (2.3), we have

    ρY(˜qY1,˜qY1)=βγ, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY3)=0,ρY(˜qY2,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY2)=γ2αγ, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY3)=0,ρY(˜qY3,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3)=0.

    By (2.4), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(βγ000γ2αγ0000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as sY=(γ2+αγ+βγ). If (G3,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC, and by RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, we can get

    {D˜qY1=(γ2λ0βγ+αγλ0+βγλ0c)˜qY1,D˜qY2=(γ2+γ2λ0αγ+αγλ0+βγλ0c)˜qY2,D˜qY3=(γ2λ0+αγλ0+βγλ0c)˜qY3.

    Therefore, by (2.9) and ASS of the first kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    {γ3γ3λ0+βγ2+αγ2αγ2λ0βγ2λ0+γc=0,β2γβγ2βγ2λ0β2γλ0αβγαβγλ0βc=0,αγ2+α2γαγ2λ0α2γλ0αβγαβγλ0+αc=0. (3.3)

    Assuming that γ=0, we get

    {βc=0,αc=0.

    If β=0, we obtain two cases (1) and (2) of Theorem 3.15 holds. If β0, for the case (3) of Theorem 3.15 holds. Next assuming that γ0, If β=0, and (3.3) can be simplified to

    {γ3γ3λ0+αγ2αγ2λ0+γc=0,αγ2+α2γαγ2λ0α2γλ0+αc=0.

    We get two cases (3) and (4) of Theorem 3.15 holds. If β0 and α=0, then a direct calculation reveals that (3.3) reduces to

    {γ3γ3λ0+βγ2βγ2λ0+γc=0,β2γβγ2βγ2λ0β2γλ0βc=0.

    We have case (5) of Theorem 3.15 holds. Thus we get Theorem 3.15.

    In the subsection, we present the LA for G4 that satisfies the following condition

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=˜qY2+(2ηβ)˜qY2,η=±1,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=β˜qY2+˜qY3,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=α˜qY1,

    the basis vectors ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 form a pseudo-orthonormal basis where ˜qY3is timelike. Four lemmas regarding the formulations of YC as well their corresponding curvatures in G4 with Lorentzian metric can be derived.

    Lemma 3.16 ([10,30]). The LCC for G4 can be given as

    L˜qY1˜qY1=0, L˜qY1˜qY2=(α2+ηβ)˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY3=(α2+ηβ)˜qY2,L˜qY2˜qY1=˜qY2+(α2η)˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY2=˜qY1, L˜qY2˜qY3=(α2η)˜qY1,L˜qY3˜qY1=(α2+η)˜qY2˜qY3, L˜qY3˜qY2=(α2+η)˜qY1, L˜qY3˜qY3=˜qY1.

    Lemma 3.17. For G4, the following equalities hold

    L˜qY1(J)˜qY1=0, L˜qY1(J)˜qY2=(α+2η2β)˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY3=(α+2η2β)˜qY2,L˜qY2(J)˜qY1=(α2η)˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY2(J)˜qY3=(α2η)˜qY1,L˜qY3(J)˜qY1=2˜qY3, L˜qY3(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY3=2˜qY1.

    Based on (2.1), as well as Lemmas 3.16 and 3.17, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.18. The YC for G4 can be given as

    Y˜qY1˜qY1=0, Y˜qY1˜qY2=(2ηβ)˜qY3, Y˜qY1˜qY3=˜qY3,Y˜qY2˜qY1=˜qY2+(β2η)˜qY3, Y˜qY2˜qY2=˜qY1, Y˜qY2˜qY3=0,Y˜qY3˜qY1=β˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY2=α˜qY1, Y˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.2), as well as Lemma 3.18, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.19. The curvature RY for (G4,gY) can be given as

    RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY1=(β22βη+1)˜qY2, RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY2=(2αηαβ1)˜qY1,RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY3=0, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY1=0, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY2=(αβ)˜qY1, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY3=0,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY1=(αβ)˜qY1, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY2=(βα)˜qY2, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY3=α˜qY3.

    Using Lemmas 3.18 and 3.19, the following theorem regarding the ASS of the first kind in the fourth LG with Lorentzian metric can be established.

    Theorem 3.20. The LG G4 cannot be ASS of a first kind related to the YC.

    Proof. According to (2.3), we have

    ρY(˜qY1,˜qY1)=2βηβ21, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY3)=0,ρY(˜qY2,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY2)=2αηαβ1, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY3)=α,ρY(˜qY3,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3)=0.

    By (2.4), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(β2+2βη10002αηαβ1α000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as sY=β2+2αη+2βηαβ2.If (G4,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC, and by RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, we can get

    {D˜qY1=(β2+β2λ0+2βη2αηλ02βηλ0+αβλ0+2λ01c)˜qY1,D˜qY2=(β2λ0+2αηαβ2αηλ02βηλ0+αβλ0+2λ01c)˜qY2α˜qY3,D˜qY3=(β2λ02αηλ02βηλ0+αβλ0+2λ0c)˜qY3.

    Therefore, by (2.9) and ASS of the first kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    {2α+(2ηβ)(β2β2λ02αη2βη+αβ+2αηλ0+2βηλ0αβλ02λ0+2+c)=0,β3β3λ0αβ22β2η+2β2ηλ0αβ2λ0+2αβη+2αβηλ02βλ0+βc=0,β2λ0β2+2βηαβ2αηλ02βηλ0+αβλ0+2λ01c=0,2α2ηα2β+αβ22α2ηλ0+α2βλ0+αβ2λ02αβη2αβηλ0+2αλ0αc=0. (3.4)

    By the first equation of (3.4), we assume that

    α=0,β=2η.

    On this basis, by the second equation of (3.4), we have c=2λ0. By the third equation of (3.4), we get c=2λ01, and there is a contradiction. One can prove Theorem 3.20.

    In the subsection, we present the LA for G5 that satisfies the following condition

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=0,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=α˜qY1+β˜qY2,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=γ˜qY1+δ˜qY2,α+δ0,αγ+βδ=0,

    the basis vectors ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 form a pseudo-orthonormal basis where ˜qY3 is timelike. Four lemmas regarding the formulations of YC as well their corresponding curvatures in G5 with Lorentzian metric can be derived.

    Lemma 3.21 ([10,30]). The LCC for G5 can be given as

    L˜qY1˜qY1=α˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY2=β+γ2˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY3=α˜qY1+β+γ2˜qY2,L˜qY2˜qY1=β+γ2˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY2=δ˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY3=β+γ2˜qY1+δ˜qY2,L˜qY3˜qY1=βγ2˜qY2, L˜qY3˜qY2=βγ2˜qY1, L˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Lemma 3.22. For G5, the following equalities hold

    L˜qY1(J)˜qY1=2α˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY2=(β+γ)˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY3=2α˜qY1(β+γ)˜qY2,L˜qY2(J)˜qY1=(β+γ)˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY2=2δ˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY3=(β+γ)˜qY12δ˜qY2,L˜qY3(J)˜qY1=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.1), as well as Lemmas 3.21 and 3.22, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.23. The YC for G5 can be given as

    Y˜qY1˜qY1=0, Y˜qY1˜qY2=0, Y˜qY1˜qY3=0,Y˜qY2˜qY1=0, Y˜qY2˜qY2=0, Y˜qY2˜qY3=0,Y˜qY3˜qY1=α˜qY1+(β+γ)˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY2=γ˜qY1δ˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.2), as well as Lemma 3.23, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.24. The curvature RY for (G5,gY) can be given as

    RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qYj=RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qYj=RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qYj=0,

    where 1j3.

    Using Lemmas 3.23 and 3.24, the following theorem regarding the ASS of the first kind in the fifth LG with Lorentzian metric can be established..

    Theorem 3.25. (G5,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to YC if it satisfies c=0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    Proof. According to (2.3), we have

    ρY(˜qY1,˜qYj)=ρY(˜qY2,˜qYj)=ρY(˜qY3,˜qYj)=0,

    where 1j3.

    By (2.4), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as sY=0. If (G5,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC, and by RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, we can get

    {D˜qY1=c˜qY1,D˜qY2=c˜qY2,D˜qY3=c˜qY3.

    Therefore, by (2.9) and ASS of the first kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    {αc=0,βc=0,γc=0,δc=0. (3.5)

    Since α+δ0 and αγ+βδ=0, by solving (3.5), we have c=0. Thus we get Theorem 3.25.

    In the subsection, we present the LA for G6 that satisfies the following condition

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=α˜qY2+β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=γ˜qY2+δ˜qY3,[˜qY2,˜qY3]=0,α+δ0,αγβδ=0.

    The basis vectors ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 form a pseudo-orthonormal basis where ˜qY3 is timelike. Four lemmas regarding the formulations of YC as well their corresponding curvatures in G6 with Lorentzian metric can be derived.

    Lemma 3.26 ([10,30]). The LCC for G6 can be given as

    L˜qY1˜qY1=0, L˜qY1˜qY2=β+γ2˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY3=β+γ2˜qY2,L˜qY2˜qY1=α˜qY2βγ2˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY2=α˜qY1, L˜qY2˜qY3=βγ2˜qY1,L˜qY3˜qY1=βγ2˜qY2δ˜qY3, L˜qY3˜qY2=βγ2˜qY1, L˜qY3˜qY3=δ˜qY1.

    Lemma 3.27. For G6, the following equalities hold

    L˜qY1(J)˜qY1=0, L˜qY1(J)˜qY2=(β+γ)˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY3=(β+γ)˜qY2,L˜qY2(J)˜qY1=(βγ)˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY2(J)˜qY3=(βγ)˜qY1,L˜qY3(J)˜qY1=2δ˜qY3, L˜qY3(J)˜qY2=0, L˜qY3(J)˜qY3=2δ˜qY1.

    Based on (2.1), as well as Lemmas 3.26 and 3.27, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.28. The YC for G6 can be given as

    Y˜qY1˜qY1=0, Y˜qY1˜qY2=β˜qY3, Y˜qY1˜qY3=δ˜qY3,Y˜qY2˜qY1=α˜qY2β˜qY3, Y˜qY2˜qY2=α˜qY1, Y˜qY2˜qY3=0,Y˜qY3˜qY1=γ˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY2=0, Y˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.2), as well as Lemma 3.28, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.29. The curvature RY for (G6,gY) can be given as

    RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY1=(βγ+α2)˜qY2βδ˜qY3, RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY2=α2˜qY1, RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY3=0,RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY1=(αγ+δγ)˜qY2, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY2=αγ˜qY1, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY3=0,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY1=αγ˜qY1, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY2=αγ˜qY2, RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY3=0.

    Using Lemmas 3.28 and 3.29, the following theorem regarding the ASS of the first kind in the sixth LG with Lorentzian metric can be established.

    Theorem 3.30. (G6,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to YC if it satisfies

    (1)α=β=c=0, δ0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(000000000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    (2)α0, β=γ=0, α+δ0, c=2α2λ0α2. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(α2000α20000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(00000000α2)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    Proof. According to (2.3), we have

    ρY(˜qY1,˜qY1)=(βγ+α2), ρY(˜qY1,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY3)=0,ρY(˜qY2,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY2)=α2, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY3)=0,ρY(˜qY3,˜qY1)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY2)=0, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3)=0.

    By (2.4), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=((α2+βγ)000α20000)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as sY=2α2βγ. If (G6,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC, and by RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, we can get

    {D˜qY1=(2α2λ0α2βγ+βγλ0c)˜qY1,D˜qY2=(2α2λ0α2+βγλ0c)˜qY2,D˜qY3=(2α2λ0+βγλ0c)˜qY3.

    Therefore, by (2.9) and ASS of the first kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    {2α3λ0α3αβγ+αβγλ0αc=0,β2γλ0β2γ2α2β+2α2βλ0βc=0,βγ2+βγ2λ0+2α2γλ0γc=0,2α2δλ0α2δβδγ+βγδλ0δc=0. (3.6)

    Because α+δ0 as well αγβδ=0, we suppose first that α=β=0, δ0. On this basis, the fourth equation of (3.6) can be simplified to

    δc=0,

    we get c=0, for the case (1) of Theorem 3.30 holds. Suppose second that γ=0, α0, α+δ0, on this basis, the first and fourth equations of (3.6) reduces to

    α2+2α2λ0c=0,

    and the second equation of (3.6) can be simplified to

    β(2α2λ02α2c)=0,

    we have α2β=0, thus β=0, for the case (2) of Theorem 3.30 holds. It turns out Theorem 3.30.

    In the subsection, we present the LA for G7 that satisfies the following condition

    [˜qY1,˜qY2]=α˜qY1β˜qY2β˜qY3,[˜qY1,˜qY3]=α˜qY1+β˜qY2+β˜qY3,
    [˜qY2,˜qY3]=γ˜qY1+δ˜qY2+δ˜qY3,α+δ0,αγ=0,

    the basis vectors ˜qY1, ˜qY2 and ˜qY3 form a pseudo-orthonormal basis where ˜qY3 is timelike. Four lemmas regarding the formulations of YC as well their corresponding curvatures in G7 with Lorentzian metric can be derived.

    Lemma 3.31 ([10,30]). The LCC for G7 can be given as

    L˜qY1˜qY1=α˜qY2+α˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY2=α˜qY1+γ2˜qY3, L˜qY1˜qY3=α˜qY1+γ2˜qY2,L˜qY2˜qY1=β˜qY2+(β+γ2)˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY2=β˜qY1+δ˜qY3, L˜qY2˜qY3=(β+γ2)˜qY1+δ˜qY2,L˜qY3˜qY1=(βγ2)˜qY2β˜qY3, L˜qY3˜qY2=(βγ2)˜qY1δ˜qY3, L˜qY3˜qY3=β˜qY1δ˜qY2.

    Lemma 3.32. For G7, the following equalities hold

    L˜qY1(J)˜qY1=2α˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY2=γ˜qY3, L˜qY1(J)˜qY3=2α˜qY1γ˜qY2,L˜qY2(J)˜qY1=(2β+γ)˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY2=2δ˜qY3, L˜qY2(J)˜qY3=(2β+γ)˜qY12δ˜qY2,L˜qY3(J)˜qY1=2β˜qY3, L˜qY3(J)˜qY2=2δ˜qY3, L˜qY3(J)˜qY3=2β˜qY1+2δ˜qY2.

    Based on (2.1), as well as Lemmas 3.31 and 3.32, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.33. The YC for G7 can be given as

    Y˜qY1˜qY1=α˜qY2, Y˜qY1˜qY2=α˜qY1β˜qY3, Y˜qY1˜qY3=β˜qY3,Y˜qY2˜qY1=β˜qY2+β˜qY3, Y˜qY2˜qY2=β˜qY1, Y˜qY2˜qY3=δ˜qY3,Y˜qY3˜qY1=α˜qY1β˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY2=γ˜qY1δ˜qY2, Y˜qY3˜qY3=0.

    Based on (2.2), as well as Lemma 3.33, one can derive the subsequent lemma.

    Lemma 3.34. The curvature RY for (G7,gY) can be given as

    RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY1=αβ˜qY1+α2˜qY2+β˜qY3,RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY2=(α2+β2+βγ)˜qY1βδ˜qY2+βδ˜qY3,RY(˜qY1,˜qY2)˜qY3=(βδ+αβ)˜qY3, RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY1=(2αβ+αγ)˜qY1+(αδ2α2)˜qY2,RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY2=(β2+βγ+αδ)˜qY1+(αβαγ+βδ)˜qY2+(βδ+αβ)˜qY3,RY(˜qY1,˜qY3)˜qY3=(αβ+βδ)˜qY3,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY1=(β2+βγ+αδ)˜qY1+(βδαβαγ)˜qY2(αβ+βδ)˜qY3,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY2=(2βδαβ+αγ+γδ)˜qY1+(δβγβ2)˜qY2,RY(˜qY2,˜qY3)˜qY3=(βγ+δ2)˜qY3.

    The following theorem regarding the ASS of the first kind in the seventh LG with Lorentzian metric can be established.

    Theorem 3.35. (G7,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to YC if it satisfies

    (1)α=β=γ=0, δ0, δ=1,c=1. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(00000δ20δ0)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(c000cδ20δc)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    (2)α=β=c=0, δ0, γ0, δ=1. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(00000δ20δ0)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(00000δ20δ0)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    (3)α0, β=γ=0, α+δ0, α=λδ, δ=1λ2λ1, c=1λ2+2λ2λ0(λ2λ1)2, λ0. And specifically

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(α2000α2δ20αδ+δ0)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3),
    D(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(δ2000δ2δ20αδ+δα2δ2)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    Proof. According to (2.3), we have

    ρY(˜qY1,˜qY1)=α2, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY2)=αβ, ρY(˜qY1,˜qY3)=αβ+βδ,ρY(˜qY2,˜qY1)=βδ, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY2)=α2β2βγ, ρY(˜qY2,˜qY3)=βγ+δ2,ρY(˜qY3,˜qY1)=αβ+βδ, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY2)=αδ+δ, ρY(˜qY3,˜qY3)=0.

    By (2.4), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    RicY(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3)=(α2αβ(αβ+βδ)βδα2β2βγ(δ2+βγ)αβ+βδαδ+δ0)(˜qY1˜qY2˜qY3).

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as sY=2α2β2βγ. If (G7,gY,J) is ASS of the first kind related to the YC, and by RicY=(sYλ0+c)Id+D, we can get

    {D˜qY1=(α2+2α2λ0+β2λ0+βγλ0c)˜qY1αβ˜qY2(αβ+βδ)˜qY3,D˜qY2=βδ˜qY1+(α2β2+2α2λ0+β2λ0βγ+βγλ0c)˜qY2(δ2+βγ)˜qY3,D˜qY3=(αβ+βδ)˜qY1+(αδ+δ)˜qY2+(2α2λ0+β2λ0+βγλ0c)˜qY3.

    Therefore, by (2.9) and ASS of the first kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    {α32α3λ0+2αβ2αδ2+2β2δαβ2λ0+αβγ+βδγαβγλ0+αc=0,β3λ0+2α2βλ0+β2γλ0+β2γ2αβδβδβc=0,β3β3λ0+α2ββ2γβδ22α2βλ0β2γλ0+βc=0,2α3λ0α2δ2β2δαβ2+αβ2λ0αδαβγ+αβγλ0αc=0,β3+β3λ0+α2β+β2γ+2α2βλ0+β2γλ03αβδ2βδβc=0,β3λ0+β2γ+βδ2+2α2βλ0+β2γλ0αβδβδβc=0,α2ββ2γβγ22βδ2+2α2γλ0+β2γλ0+βγ2λ0+αβδγc=0,αβ2+2β2δαδ2δ2+2α2δλ0+β2δλ0+αβγ+βδγλ0δc=0,δ3+αβ2+β2δα2δ+2α2δλ0+β2δλ0+αβγ+βγδ+βγδλ0δc=0. (3.7)

    Because α+δ0 as well αγ=0. Let's first suppose that α=0. On this basis, (3.7) can be simplified to

    {2β2δ+βδγ=0,β3λ0+β2γλ0+β2γβδβc=0,β3β3λ0β2γβδ2β2γλ0+βc=0,β2δ=0,β3+β3λ0+β2γ+β2γλ02βδβc=0,β3λ0+β2γ+βδ2+β2γλ0βδβc=0,β2γ+βγ2+2βδ2β2γλ0βγ2λ0+γc=0,2β2δδ2+β2δλ0+βδγλ0δc=0,δ3+β2δ+β2δλ0+βγδ+βγδλ0δc=0.

    If γ0 and δ0, we get case (2) of Theorem 3.35 holds. If γ=0 as well δ0, on this basis, we calculate that

    {β2δ=0,β3λ0βδβc=0,β3β3λ0βδ2+βc=0,β3+β3λ02βδβc=0,β3λ0+βδ2βδβc=0,βδ2=0,2β2δδ2+β2δλ0δc=0,δ3+β2δ+β2δλ0δc=0.

    we obtain case (1) of Theorem 3.35 holds. Assume second that α0, α+δ0 and γ=0. In this case, (3.7) reduces to

    {α32α3λ0+2αβ2αδ2+2β2δαβ2λ0+αc=0,β3λ0+2α2βλ02αβδβδβc=0,β3β3λ0+α2ββδ22α2βλ0+βc=0,2α3λ0α2δ2β2δαβ2+αβ2λ0αδαc=0,β3+β3λ0+α2β+2α2βλ03αβδ2βδβc=0,β3λ0+βδ2+2α2βλ0αβδβδβc=0,α2β2βδ2+αβδ=0,αβ2+2β2δαδ2δ2+2α2δλ0+β2δλ0δc=0,δ3+αβ2+β2δα2δ+2α2δλ0+β2δλ0δc=0.

    Next suppose that β=0, we have

    {α32α3λ0αδ2+αc=0,2α3λ0α2δαδαc=0,αδ2+δ22α2δλ0+δc=0,δ3α2δ+2α2δλ0δc=0.

    Then we get

    α3δ32αδ2δ2αδ=0.

    Let α=λδ, λ0, it becomes

    (λ32λ1)δ3(λ+1)δ2=0,

    for the cases (3) of Theorem 3.35 holds. Thus it turns out Theorem 3.35.

    In the section, we use the soliton equation in an effort to finish a categorization about three-dimensional LLG that support ASS of the second kind associated with YC.

    Let

    (4.1)

    and

    (4.2)

    Similar to the formulae (2.6), we have

    (4.3)

    where is a real number. Refer to [29], we can get

    (4.4)

    for vector fields , .

    Definition 4.1. is called ASS of the second kind related with YC when it satisfies

    (4.5)

    which is an actual number, is a real-valued constant, as well is derivation for , which can be

    (4.6)

    for , .

    Theorem 4.2. is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies , , . And specifically

    Proof. For , according to (4.1), we have

    (4.7)

    By (4.2), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as . If is ASS of the second kind related to the YC, and by , we can get

    Therefore, by (4.6) and ASS of the second kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    (4.8)

    Since , by solving the second and third equations of (4.8) imply that . In this case, the first equation of (4.8) can be simplified to

    we have . Thus we get Theorem 4.2.

    Theorem 4.3. is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies , , . And specifically

    Proof. For , according to (4.1), we can get

    By (4.2), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as . If is ASS of the second kind related to the YC, and by , we can get

    Therefore, by (4.6) and ASS of the second kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    (4.9)

    By solving the first and second equations of (4.9) imply that

    Since , we have . In this case, the first equation of (4.9) reduces to

    we get . In this case, the third equation of (4.9) can be simplified to

    then we have . Thus we get Theorem 4.3.

    Theorem 4.4. is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies ASS of the first kind related to YC.

    Proof. For , according to (4.1), we have

    By (4.2), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    Since , then . So is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies ASS of the first kind related to YC.

    Theorem 4.5. The LG cannot be ASS of a second kind related to the YC.

    Proof. For , according to (4.1), we can get

    By (4.2), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as . If is ASS of the second kind related to the YC, and by , we can get

    Therefore, by (4.6) and ASS of the second kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    (4.10)

    By the first equation of (4.10), we assume that

    On this basis, by the second equation of (4.10), we get . By the third equation of (4.10), we have , and there is a contradiction. One can prove Theorem 4.5.

    Theorem 4.6. is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies ASS of the first kind related to YC.

    Proof. For , according to (4.1), we can get

    By (4.2), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    Since , then . So is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies ASS of the first kind related to YC.

    Theorem 4.7. is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies ASS of the first kind related to YC.

    Proof. For , according to (4.1), we have

    By (4.2), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    Since , then . So is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies ASS of the first kind related to YC.

    Theorem 4.8. is ASS of the second kind related to YC if it satisfies , . And specifically

    Proof. For , according to (4.1), we can get

    According to (4.2), the Ricci operator can be expressed as

    As a result, the scalar curvature can be obtained as . If is ASS of the second kind related to the YC, and by , we can get

    Therefore, by (4.6) and ASS of the second kind related to the YC can be established if it satisfies

    (4.11)

    Because as well . Let's first suppose . On this basis, (4.11) reduces to

    (4.12)

    If as well , on this basis, the first and fourth equations of (4.12) can be simplified to

    we get . The seventh equation of (4.12) reduces to

    we obtain . The eighth and ninth equations of (4.12) can be simplified to

    we have , and there is a contradiction. If as well , on this basis, we calculate that

    (4.13)

    By solving (4.13), we obtain . Suppose second that , as well . In this case, (4.11) can be simplified to

    Next suppose that , we have

    (4.14)

    Then we get

    Let , , it becomes

    we have . For , (4.14) now reduces to

    A simple computation demonstrates that the result is , then we get , . In this case, we have and , so there is a contradiction. Thus it turns out Theorem 4.8.

    We focus on the existence conditions of ASS related to YC in the context of three-dimensional LLG. We classify those ASS in three-dimensional LLG. The major results demonstrate that ASS related to YC are present in , , , , and , while they are not identifiable in . Based on this research, we will explore gradient Schouten solitons associated with YC using the theories in [31,32,33].

    During writing this work, the authors confirm that they are not using any AI techniques.

    The study was funded by the Special Fund for Scientific and Technological Innovation of Graduate Students in Mudanjiang Normal University (Grant No. kjcx2022-018mdjnu), the "Four New" Special Project of in Mudanjiang Normal University(Grant No. 22-XJ22024) and the Project of Science and Technology of Mudanjiang Normal University(Grant No. GP2022006).

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.



    [1] C. Zhao, W. Zheng, A review for aqueous electrochemical supercapacitors, Front. Energy Res., 3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2015.00023 doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2015.00023
    [2] L. Lai, H. Yang, L. Wang, B. K. Teh, J. Zhong, H. Chou, et al., Preparation of supercapacitor electrodes through selection of graphene surface functionalities, ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 5941–5951. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn3008096 doi: 10.1021/nn3008096
    [3] E. Frackowiak, Carbon materials for supercapacitor application, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9 (2007), 1774. https://doi.org/10.1039/b618139m doi: 10.1039/b618139m
    [4] M. Inagaki, H. Konno, O. Tanaike, Carbon materials for electrochemical capacitors, J. Power Sources, 195 (2010), 7880–7903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.036 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.036
    [5] Z. S. Wu, W. Ren, D. W. Wang, F. Li, B. Liu, H. M. Cheng, High-energy MnO2 nanowire/graphene and graphene asymmetric electrochemical capacitors, ACS Nano, 4 (2010), 5835–5842. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101754k doi: 10.1021/nn101754k
    [6] P. Forouzandeh, V. Kumaravel, S. C. Pillai, Electrode materials for supercapacitors: a review of recent advances, Catalysts, 10 (2020), 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10090969 doi: 10.3390/catal10090969
    [7] Y. Wang, Z. Shi, Y. Huang, Y. Ma, C. Wang, M. Chen, et al., Supercapacitor devices based on graphene materials, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009), 13103–13107. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp902214f doi: 10.1021/jp902214f
    [8] Y. Shabangoli, M. S. Rahmanifar, A. Noori, M. F. El-Kady, R. B. Kaner, M. F. Mousavi, Nile blue functionalized graphene aerogel as a pseudocapacitive negative electrode material across the full pH range, ACS Nano, 13 (2019), 12567–12576. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b03351 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03351
    [9] H. Ma, D. Kong, Y. Xu, X. Xie, Y. Tao, Z. Xiao, et al., Disassembly-reassembly approach to RuO2/graphene composites for ultrahigh volumetric capacitance supercapacitor, Small, 13 (2017), 1701026. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201701026 doi: 10.1002/smll.201701026
    [10] N. Syarif, T. A. Ivandini, W. Wibowo, Direct synthesis carbon/metal oxide composites for electrochemical capacitors electrode, Int. Trans. J. Eng. Manage. Appl. Sci. Technol., 3 (2012), 21–34. Available from: https://tuengr.com/V03/21-34.pdf.
    [11] L. L. Zhang, X. S. Zhao, Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38 (2009), 2520–2531. https://doi.org/10.1039/b813846j doi: 10.1039/b813846j
    [12] E. Frackowiak, F. Béguin, Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors, Carbon, 39 (2001), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00183-4 doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00183-4
    [13] P. Simon, A. Burke, Nanostructured carbons: double-layer capacitance and more, Electrochem. Soc. Interface, 17 (2008), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.F05081IF doi: 10.1149/2.F05081IF
    [14] E. Frackowiak, K. Metenier, V. Bertagna, F. Beguin, Supercapacitor electrodes from multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Appl. Phys. Lett., 77 (2000), 2421–2423. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1290146 doi: 10.1063/1.1290146
    [15] M. Pumera, Graphene-based nanomaterials and their electrochemistry, Chem. Soc. Rev., 39 (2010), 4146–4157. https://doi.org/10.1039/c002690p doi: 10.1039/c002690p
    [16] Y. B. Tan, J. M. Lee, Graphene for supercapacitor applications, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1 (2013), 14814–14843. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta12193c doi: 10.1039/c3ta12193c
    [17] T. Y. Kim, G. Jung, S. Yoo, K. S. Suh, R. S. Ruoff, Activated graphene-based carbons as supercapacitor electrodes with macro- and mesopores, ACS Nano, 7 (2013), 6899–6905. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn402077v doi: 10.1021/nn402077v
    [18] V. C. Lokhande, A. C. Lokhande, C. D. Lokhande, J. H. Kim, T. Ji, Supercapacitive composite metal oxide electrodes formed with carbon, metal oxides and conducting polymers, J Alloys Compd., 682 (2016), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.242 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.242
    [19] J. Y. Hwang, M. F. El-Kady, Y. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Shao, K. Marsh, et al., Direct preparation and processing of graphene/RuO2 nanocomposite electrodes for high-performance capacitive energy storage, Nano Energy, 18 (2015), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.009 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.009
    [20] D. Zhao, X. Guo, Y. Gao, F. Gao, An electrochemical capacitor electrode based on porous carbon spheres hybrided with polyaniline and nanoscale ruthenium oxide, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 4 (2012), 5583–5589. https://doi.org/10.1021/am301484s doi: 10.1021/am301484s
    [21] I. Acznik, K. Lota, A. Sierczynska, G. Lota, Carbon-supported manganese dioxide as electrode material for asymmetric electrochemical capacitors, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 9 (2014), 2518–2534. Available from: http://www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol9/90502518.pdf.
    [22] S. Chen, J. Zhu, X. Wu, Q. Han, X. Wang, Graphene oxide-MnO2 nanocomposites for supercapacitors, ACS Nano, 4 (2010), 2822–2830. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901311t doi: 10.1021/nn901311t
    [23] J. G. Wang, F. Kang, B. Wei, Engineering of MnO2-based nanocomposites for high-performance supercapacitors, Prog. Mater. Sci., 74 (2015), 51–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.04.003
    [24] D. D. Zhao, M. W. Xu, W. J. Zhou, J. Zhang, H. L. Li, Preparation of ordered mesoporous nickel oxide film electrodes via lyotropic liquid crystal templated electrodeposition route, Electrochim. Acta, 53 (2008), 2699–2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.07.053 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.07.053
    [25] Y. Wang, Y. Xia, Electrochemical capacitance characterization of NiO with ordered mesoporous structure synthesized by template SBA-15, Electrochim. Acta, 51 (2006), 3223–3227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.013 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.013
    [26] B. Li, M. Zheng, H. Xue, H. Pang, High performance electrochemical capacitor materials focusing on nickel based materials, Inorg. Chem. Front., 3 (2016), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5QI00187K doi: 10.1039/C5QI00187K
    [27] S. R. Ede, S. Anantharaj, K. T. Kumaran, S. Mishrab, S. Kundu, One step synthesis of Ni/Ni(OH)2 nano sheets (NSs) and their application in asymmetric supercapacitors, RSC Adv., 7 (2017), 5898–5911. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA26584G doi: 10.1039/C6RA26584G
    [28] H. Wang, H. S. Casalongue, Y. Liang, H. Dai, Ni(OH)2 nanoplates grown on graphene as advanced electrochemical pseudocapacitor materials, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010), 7472–7477. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja102267j doi: 10.1021/ja102267j
    [29] Q. T. Qu, L. L. Liu, Y. P. Wu, R. Holze, Electrochemical behavior of V2O5·0.6H2O nanoribbons in neutral aqueous electrolyte solution, Electrochim. Acta, 96 (2013), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.078 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.078
    [30] V. Augustyn, P. Simon, B. Dunn, Pseudocapacitive oxide materials for high-rate electrochemical energy storage, Energy Environ. Sci., 7 (2014), 1597. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee44164d doi: 10.1039/c3ee44164d
    [31] Y. Liu, J. Zhou, J. Tang, W. Tang, Three-dimensional, chemically bonded polypyrrole/bacterial cellulose/graphene composites for high-performance supercapacitors, Chem. Mater., 27 (2015), 7034–7041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03060 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03060
    [32] G. A. Snook, P. Kao, A. S. Best, Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and electrodes, J. Power Sources, 196 (2011), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.084 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.084
    [33] C. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Liu, Construction of high-capacitance 3D CoO@Polypyrrole nanowire array electrode for aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor, Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 2078–2085. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400378j doi: 10.1021/nl400378j
    [34] Poonam, K. Sharma, A. Arora, S. K. Tripathi, Review of supercapacitors: materials and devices, J. Energy Storage, 21 (2019), 801–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2019.01.010
    [35] M. Mastragostino, Conducting polymers as electrode materials in supercapacitors, Solid State Ionics, 148 (2002), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00093-0 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00093-0
    [36] K. Xie, B. Wei, Materials and structures for stretchable energy storage and conversion devices, Adv. Mater., 26 (2014), 3592–3617. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305919 doi: 10.1002/adma.201305919
    [37] I. I. Karayalcin, The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 9 (1982), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(82)90022-4 doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(82)90022-4
    [38] Z. Pawlak, Rough sets, Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci., 11 (1982), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001956 doi: 10.1007/BF01001956
    [39] T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (Decision Making Series), McGraw-Hill, (1980), 1–287.
    [40] M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, Z. Turskis, Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica, 26 (2015), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57 doi: 10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
    [41] J. L. Deng, Introduction to Grey system theory, J. Grey Syst., 1 (1989), 1–24.
    [42] T. C. Chang, S. J. Lin, Grey relation analysis of carbon dioxide emissions from industrial production and energy uses in Taiwan, J. Environ. Manage., 56 (1999), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0288 doi: 10.1006/jema.1999.0288
    [43] L. Li, X. Wang, S. Wang, Z. Cao, Z. Wu, H. Wang, et al., Activated carbon prepared from lignite as supercapacitor electrode materials, Electroanalysis, 28 (2016), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201500532 doi: 10.1002/elan.201500532
    [44] M. Zhang, J. Cheng, L. Zhang, Y. Li, M. S. Chen, Y. Chen, et al., Activated carbon by one-step calcination of deoxygenated agar for high voltage lithium ion supercapacitor, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 8 (2020), 3637–3643. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06347 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06347
    [45] F. Cheng, X. Yang, S. Zhang, W. Lu, Boosting the supercapacitor performances of activated carbon with carbon nanomaterials, J. Power Sources, 450 (2020), 227678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227678 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227678
    [46] Y. J. Hsiao, L. Y. Lin, Efficient pore engineering in carbonized zeolitic imidazolate Framework-8 via chemical and physical methods as active materials for supercapacitors, J. Power Sources, 486 (2021), 229370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229370 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229370
    [47] Y. H. Chiu, L. Y. Lin, Effect of activating agents for producing activated carbon using a facile one-step synthesis with waste coffee grounds for symmetric supercapacitors, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 101 (2019), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2019.04.050 doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2019.04.050
    [48] Q. Cheng, J. Tang, J. Ma, H. Zhang, N. Shinyaa, L. C. Qin, Graphene and carbon nanotube composite electrodes for supercapacitors with ultra-high energy density, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13 (2011), 17615. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp21910c doi: 10.1039/c1cp21910c
    [49] Q. Liu, J. Yang, X. Luo, Y. Miao, Y. Zhang, W. Xu, et al., Fabrication of a fibrous MnO2@MXene/CNT electrode for high-performance flexible supercapacitor, Ceram. Int., 46 (2020), 11874–11881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.222 doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.222
    [50] H. Kim, B. N. Popov, Characterization of hydrous ruthenium oxide/carbon nanocomposite supercapacitors prepared by a colloidal method, J. Power Sources, 104 (2002), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00903-X doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00903-X
    [51] S. Kong, K. Cheng, T. Ouyang, Y. Gao, K. Ye, G. Wang, et al., Facile electrodepositing processed of RuO2-graphene nanosheets-CNT composites as a binder-free electrode for electrochemical supercapacitors, Electrochim. Acta, 246 (2017), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.019 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.019
    [52] O. Ghodbane, J. L. Pascal, F. Favier, Microstructural effects on charge-storage properties in MnO2-based electrochemical supercapacitors, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 1 (2009), 1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1021/am900094e doi: 10.1021/am900094e
    [53] J. Dong, G. Lu, F. Wu, C. Xu, X. Kang, Z. Cheng, Facile synthesis of a nitrogen-doped graphene flower-like MnO2 nanocomposite and its application in supercapacitors, Appl. Surf. Sci., 427 (2018), 986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.291 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.291
    [54] Z. Lu, Z. Chang, J. Liu, X. Sun, Stable ultrahigh specific capacitance of NiO nanorod arrays, Nano Res., 4 (2011), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-011-0121-1 doi: 10.1007/s12274-011-0121-1
    [55] P. Liu, M. Yang, S. Zhou, Y. Huang, Y. Zhu, Hierarchical shell-core structures of concave spherical NiO nanospines@carbon for high performance supercapacitor electrodes, Electrochim. Acta, 294 (2019), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.112 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.112
    [56] C. S. Kwak, T. H. Ko, J. H. Lee, H. Y. Kim, B. S. Kim, Flexible transparent symmetric solid-state supercapacitors based on NiO-decorated nanofiber-based composite electrodes with excellent mechanical flexibility and cyclability, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 3 (2020), 2394–2403. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b02073 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02073
    [57] A. Ray, A. Roy, S. Saha, M. Ghosh, S. R. Chowdhury, T. Maiyalagan, et al., Electrochemical energy storage properties of Ni-Mn-Oxide electrodes for advance asymmetric supercapacitor application, Langmuir, 35 (2019), 8257–8267. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00955 doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00955
    [58] P. Y. Lee, L. Y. Lin, Developing zeolitic imidazolate frameworks 67-derived fluorides using 2-methylimidazole and ammonia fluoride for energy storage and electrocatalysis, Energy, 239 (2022), 122129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122129 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122129
    [59] K. L. Chiu, L. Y. Lin, Applied potential-dependent performance of the nickel cobalt oxysulfide nanotube/nickel molybdenum oxide nanosheet core–shell structure in energy storage and oxygen evolution, J. Mater. Chem. A, 7 (2019), 4626–4639. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA11471D doi: 10.1039/C8TA11471D
    [60] H. B. Li, M. H. Yu, F. X. Wang, P. Liu, Y. Liang, J. Xiao, et al., Amorphous nickel hydroxide nanospheres with ultrahigh capacitance and energy density as electrochemical pseudocapacitor materials, Nat. Commun., 4 (2013), 1894. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2932 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2932
    [61] Z. Xiao, P. Liu, J. Zhang, H. Qi, J. Liu, B. Li, et al., Pillar-coordinated strategy to modulate phase transfer of α-Ni(OH)2 for enhanced supercapacitor application, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 3 (2020), 5628–5636. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c00596 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.0c00596
    [62] T. Xia, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, Q. Li, C. Ao, R. Hu, et al., Flexible and conductive carbonized cotton fabrics coupled with a nanostructured Ni(OH)2 coating for high performance aqueous symmetric supercapacitors, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 7 (2019), 5231–5239. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06150 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06150
    [63] M. J. Deng, L. H. Yeh, Y. H. Lin, J. M. Chen, T. H. Chou, 3D network V2O5 electrodes in a gel electrolyte for high-voltage wearable symmetric pseudocapacitors, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11 (2019), 29838–29848. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b07845 doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07845
    [64] H. C. Chen, Y. C. Lin, Y. L. Chen, C. J. Chen, Facile fabrication of three-dimensional hierarchical nanoarchitectures of VO2/Graphene@NiS2 hybrid aerogel for high-performance all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors with ultrahigh energy density, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2 (2019), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b01486 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01486
    [65] W. Bi, Y. Wu, C. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Du, G. Gao, et al., Gradient oxygen vacancies in V2O5/PEDOT nanocables for high-performance supercapacitors, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2 (2019), 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b01676 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01676
    [66] K. Wang, J. Huang, Z. Wei, Conducting polyaniline nanowire arrays for high performance supercapacitors, J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010), 8062–8067. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9113255 doi: 10.1021/jp9113255
    [67] C. C. Hu, K. H. Chang, M. C. Lin, Y. T. Wu, Design and tailoring of the nanotubular arrayed architecture of hydrous RuO2 for next generation supercapacitors, Nano Lett., 6 (2006), 2690–2695. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl061576a doi: 10.1021/nl061576a
    [68] Y. Shi, L. Pan, B. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Cui, Z. Bao, et al., Nanostructured conductive polypyrrole hydrogels as high-performance, flexible supercapacitor electrodes, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2 (2014), 6086–6091. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA00484A doi: 10.1039/C4TA00484A
    [69] P. Bober, N. Gavrilov, A. Kovalcik, M. Mičušík, C. Unterweger, I. A. Pašti, et al., Electrochemical properties of lignin/polypyrrole composites and their carbonized analogues, Mater. Chem. Phys., 213 (2018), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.043 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.043
    [70] F. Zhang, J. Tang, N. Shinya, L. C. Qin, Hybrid graphene electrodes for supercapacitors of high energy density, Chem. Phys. Lett., 584 (2013), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2013.08.021 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.08.021
    [71] H. Wang, H. Yi, X. Chen, X. Wang, Asymmetric supercapacitors based on nano-architectured nickel oxide/graphene foam and hierarchical porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes with ultrahigh-rate performance, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2 (2014), 3223–3230. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA15046A doi: 10.1039/C3TA15046A
    [72] S. D. Perera, B. Patel, N. Nijem, K. Roodenko, O. Seitz, J. P. Ferraris, et al., Vanadium oxide nanowire-carbon nanotube binder-free flexible electrodes for supercapacitors, Adv. Energy Mater., 1 (2011), 936–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100221 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201100221
    [73] L. Hu, N. Yan, Q. Chen, P. Zhang, H. Zhong, X. Zheng, et al., Fabrication based on the kirkendall effect of Co3O4 porous nanocages with extraordinarily high capacity for lithium storage, Chem. - A Eur. J., 18 (2012), 8971–8977. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201200770 doi: 10.1002/chem.201200770
    [74] Y. Yang, Y. Xi, J. Li, G. Wei, N. I. Klyui, W. Han, Flexible supercapacitors based on polyaniline arrays coated graphene aerogel electrodes, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 12 (2017), 394. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2159-9 doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2159-9
    [75] J. Yan, T. Wei, Z. Fan, W. Qian, M. Zhang, X. Shen, et al., Preparation of graphene nanosheet/carbon nanotube/polyaniline composite as electrode material for supercapacitors, J. Power Sources, 195 (2010), 3041–3045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.028 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.028
    [76] J. Jaidev, S. Ramaprabhu, Poly(p-phenylenediamine)/graphene nanocomposites for supercapacitor applications, J. Mater. Chem., 22 (2012), 18775–18783. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM33627H doi: 10.1039/C2JM33627H
    [77] M. S. Nam, U. Patil, B. Park, H. B. Sim, S. C. Jun, A binder free synthesis of 1D PANI and 2D MoS2 nanostructured hybrid composite electrodes by the electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method for supercapacitor application, RSC Adv., 6 (2016), 101592–101601. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA16078F doi: 10.1039/C6RA16078F
    [78] Y. Liu, B. Zhang, Y. Yang, Z. Chang, Z. Wen, Y. Wu, Polypyrrole-coated α-MoO3 nanobelts with good electrochemical performance as anode materials for aqueous supercapacitors, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1 (2013), 13582. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta12902k doi: 10.1039/c3ta12902k
    [79] R. P. Raj, P. Ragupathy, S. Mohan, Remarkable capacitive behavior of a Co3O4–polyindole composite as electrode material for supercapacitor applications, J. Mater. Chem. A, 3 (2015), 24338–24348. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA07046E doi: 10.1039/C5TA07046E
    [80] Z. S. Iro, C. Subramani, S. S. Dash, A brief review on electrode materials for supercapacitor, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 11 (2016), 10628–10643. https://doi.org/10.20964/2016.12.50 doi: 10.20964/2016.12.50
    [81] A. M. Al-Syadi, Electrochemical performance of Na2O–Li2O–P2S5–V2S5 glass–ceramic nanocomposites as electrodes for supercapacitors, Appl. Phys. A, 127 (2021), 755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04899-7 doi: 10.1007/s00339-021-04899-7
    [82] A. M. Al-Syadi, M. S. Al-Assiri, H. M. A. Hassan, G. E. Enany, M. M. El-Desoky, Effect of sulfur addition on the electrochemical performance of lithium‑vanadium-phosphate glasses as electrodes for energy storage devices, J. Electroanal. Chem., 804 (2017), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.09.041 doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.09.041
    [83] M. M. El-Desoky, A. M. Al-Syadi, M. S. Al-Assiri, H. M. A. Hassan, G. E. Enany, Electrochemical performance of novel Li3V2(PO4)3 glass-ceramic nanocomposites as electrodes for energy storage devices, J. Solid State Electrochem., 20 (2016), 2663–2671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-016-3267-7 doi: 10.1007/s10008-016-3267-7
    [84] M. M. El-Desoky, A. M. Al-Syadi, M. S. Al-Assiri, H. M. A. Hassan, Effect of sulfur addition and nanocrystallization on the transport properties of lithium–vanadium–phosphate glasses, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 29 (2018), 968–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7994-z doi: 10.1007/s10854-017-7994-z
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(12202) PDF downloads(63) Cited by(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog