In the framework of Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives, we study a new coupled system of fractional differential equations of higher orders supplemented with coupled nonlocal boundary conditions. The existence and uniqueness results of the solutions are proved. We consider the classical fixed-point theories due to Banach and Krasnoselskii for the main results. An example illustrating the main results is introduced.
Citation: Shorog Aljoudi. Existence and uniqueness results for coupled system of fractional differential equations with exponential kernel derivatives[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 590-606. doi: 10.3934/math.2023027
[1] | Muhammad Asim, Ghada AlNemer . Boundedness on variable exponent Morrey-Herz space for fractional multilinear Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 117-136. doi: 10.3934/math.2025007 |
[2] | Jie Sun, Jiamei Chen . Weighted estimates for commutators associated to singular integral operator satisfying a variant of Hörmander's condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25714-25728. doi: 10.3934/math.20231311 |
[3] | Kieu Huu Dung, Do Lu Cong Minh, Pham Thi Kim Thuy . Commutators of Hardy-Cesàro operators on Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19147-19166. doi: 10.3934/math.20221051 |
[4] | Yueping Zhu, Yan Tang, Lixin Jiang . Boundedness of multilinear Calderón-Zygmund singular operators on weighted Lebesgue spaces and Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11246-11262. doi: 10.3934/math.2021652 |
[5] | Wanjing Zhang, Suixin He, Jing Zhang . Boundedness of sublinear operators on weighted grand Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17381-17401. doi: 10.3934/math.2023888 |
[6] | Babar Sultan, Mehvish Sultan, Qian-Qian Zhang, Nabil Mlaiki . Boundedness of Hardy operators on grand variable weighted Herz spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24515-24527. doi: 10.3934/math.20231250 |
[7] | Javeria Younas, Amjad Hussain, Hadil Alhazmi, A. F. Aljohani, Ilyas Khan . BMO estimates for commutators of the rough fractional Hausdorff operator on grand-variable-Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23434-23448. doi: 10.3934/math.20241139 |
[8] | Ming Liu, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yao . Weighted variable Morrey-Herz space estimates for mth order commutators of n−dimensional fractional Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20063-20079. doi: 10.3934/math.20231022 |
[9] | Shuhui Yang, Yan Lin . Multilinear strongly singular integral operators with generalized kernels and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13533-13551. doi: 10.3934/math.2021786 |
[10] | Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam . Some weighted estimates for the commutators of p-adic Hardy operator on two weighted p-adic Herz-type spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9633-9646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021561 |
In the framework of Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives, we study a new coupled system of fractional differential equations of higher orders supplemented with coupled nonlocal boundary conditions. The existence and uniqueness results of the solutions are proved. We consider the classical fixed-point theories due to Banach and Krasnoselskii for the main results. An example illustrating the main results is introduced.
Let T be the Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator and b be a locally integrable function on Rn. The commutator generated by b and T is defined by [b,T]f=bT(f)−T(bf). The investigation of the commutator begins with Coifman-Rochberg-Weiss pioneering study and classical result (see [6]). The classical result of Coifman, Rochberg and Weiss (see [6]) states that the commutator [b,T]f=T(bf)−bTf is bounded on Lp(Rn) for 1<p<∞ if and only if b∈BMO(Rn). The major reason for considering the problem of commutators is that the boundedness of commutator can produces some characterizations of function spaces (see [1,6]). Chanillo (see [1]) proves a similar result when T is replaced by the fractional integral operator. In [11], the boundedness properties of the commutators for the extreme values of p are obtained. In recent years, the theory of Herz space and Herz type Hardy space, as a local version of Lebesgue space and Hardy space, have been developed (see [8,9,12,13]). The main purpose of this paper is to establish the endpoint continuity properties of some multilinear operators related to certain non-convolution type fractional singular integral operators on Herz and Herz type Hardy spaces.
First, let us introduce some notations (see [8,9,10,12,13,15]). Throughout this paper, Q will denote a cube of Rn with sides parallel to the axes. For a cube Q and a locally integrable function f, let fQ=|Q|−1∫Qf(x)dx and f#(x)=supQ∋x|Q|−1∫Q|f(y)−fQ|dy. Moreover, f is said to belong to BMO(Rn) if f#∈L∞ and define ||f||BMO=||f#||L∞; We also define the central BMO space by CMO(Rn), which is the space of those functions f∈Lloc(Rn) such that
||f||CMO=supr>1|Q(0,r)|−1∫Q|f(y)−fQ|dy<∞. |
It is well-known that (see [9,10])
||f||CMO≈supr>1infc∈C|Q(0,r)|−1∫Q|f(x)−c|dx. |
For k∈Z, define Bk={x∈Rn:|x|≤2k} and Ck=Bk∖Bk−1. Denote by χk the characteristic function of Ck and ˜χk the characteristic function of Ck for k≥1 and ˜χ0 the characteristic function of B0.
Definition 1. Let 0<p<∞ and α∈R.
(1) The homogeneous Herz space ˙Kαp(Rn) is defined by
˙Kαp(Rn)={f∈Lploc(Rn∖{0}):||f||˙Kαp<∞}, |
where
||f||˙Kαp=∞∑k=−∞2kα||fχk||Lp; |
(2) The nonhomogeneous Herz space Kαp(Rn) is defined by
Kαp(Rn)={f∈Lploc(Rn):||f||Kαp<∞}, |
where
||f||Kαp=∞∑k=02kα||f˜χk||Lp. |
If α=n(1−1/p), we denote that ˙Kαp(Rn)=˙Kp(Rn), Kαp(Rn)=Kp(Rn).
Definition 2. Let 0<δ<n and 1<p<n/δ. We shall call Bδp(Rn) the space of those functions f on Rn such that
||f||Bδp=supd>1d−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχQ(0,d)||Lp<∞. |
Definition 3. Let 1<p<∞.
(1) The homogeneous Herz type Hardy space H˙Kp(Rn) is defined by
H˙Kp(Rn)={f∈S′(Rn):G(f)∈˙Kp(Rn)}, |
where
||f||H˙Kp=||G(f)||˙Kp. |
(2) The nonhomogeneous Herz type Hardy space HKp(Rn) is defined by
HKp(Rn)={f∈S′(Rn):G(f)∈Kp(Rn)}, |
where
||f||HKp=||G(f)||Kp. |
where G(f) is the grand maximal function of f.
The Herz type Hardy spaces have the atomic decomposition characterization.
Definition 4. Let 1<p<∞. A function a(x) on Rn is called a central (n(1−1/p),p)-atom (or a central (n(1−1/p),p)-atom of restrict type), if
1) Suppa⊂B(0,d) for some d>0 (or for some d≥1),
2) ||a||Lp≤|B(0,d)|1/p−1,
3) ∫a(x)dx=0.
Lemma 1. (see [9,13]) Let 1<p<∞. A temperate distribution f belongs to H˙Kp(Rn)(or HKp(Rn)) if and only if there exist central (n(1−1/p),p)-atoms(or central (n(1−1/p),p)-atoms of restrict type) aj supported on Bj=B(0,2j) and constants λj, ∑j|λj|<∞ such that f=∑∞j=−∞λjaj (or f=∑∞j=0λjaj)in the S′(Rn) sense, and
||f||H˙Kp( or ||f||HKp)≈∑j|λj|. |
In this paper, we will consider a class of multilinear operators related to some non-convolution type singular integral operators, whose definition are following.
Let m be a positive integer and A be a function on Rn. We denote that
Rm+1(A;x,y)=A(x)−∑|β|≤m1β!DβA(y)(x−y)β |
and
Qm+1(A;x,y)=Rm(A;x,y)−∑|β|=m1β!DβA(x)(x−y)β. |
Definition 5. Fixed ε>0 and 0<δ<n. Let Tδ:S→S′ be a linear operator. Tδ is called a fractional singular integral operator if there exists a locally integrable function K(x,y) on Rn×Rn such that
Tδ(f)(x)=∫RnK(x,y)f(y)dy |
for every bounded and compactly supported function f, where K satisfies:
|K(x,y)|≤C|x−y|−n+δ |
and
|K(y,x)−K(z,x)|+|K(x,y)−K(x,z)|≤C|y−z|ε|x−z|−n−ε+δ |
if 2|y−z|≤|x−z|. The multilinear operator related to the fractional singular integral operator Tδ is defined by
TAδ(f)(x)=∫RnRm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy; |
We also consider the variant of TAδ, which is defined by
˜TAδ(f)(x)=∫RnQm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy. |
Note that when m=0, TAδ is just the commutators of Tδ and A (see [1,6,11,14]). It is well known that multilinear operator, as a non-trivial extension of commutator, is of great interest in harmonic analysis and has been widely studied by many authors (see [3,4,5]). In [7], the weighted Lp(p>1)-boundedness of the multilinear operator related to some singular integral operator are obtained. In [2], the weak (H1, L1)-boundedness of the multilinear operator related to some singular integral operator are obtained. In this paper, we will study the endpoint continuity properties of the multilinear operators TAδ and ˜TAδ on Herz and Herz type Hardy spaces.
Now we state our results as following.
Theorem 1. Let 0<δ<n, 1<p<n/δ and DβA∈BMO(Rn) for all β with |β|=m. Suppose that TAδ is the same as in Definition 5 such that Tδ is bounded from Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn) for any p,q∈(1,+∞] with 1/q=1/p−δ/n. Then TAδ is bounded from Bδp(Rn) to CMO(Rn).
Theorem 2. Let 0<δ<n, 1<p<n/δ, 1/q=1/p−δ/n and DβA∈BMO(Rn) for all β with |β|=m. Suppose that ˜TAδ is the same as in Definition 5 such that ˜TAδ is bounded from Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn) for any p,q∈(1,+∞) with 1/q=1/p−δ/n. Then ˜TAδ is bounded from H˙Kp(Rn) to ˙Kαq(Rn) with α=n(1−1/p).
Theorem 3. Let 0<δ<n, 1<p<n/δ and DβA∈BMO(Rn) for all β with |β|=m. Suppose that ˜TAδ is the same as in Definition 5 such that ˜TAδ is bounded from Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn) for any p,q∈(1,+∞) with 1/q=1/p−δ/n. Then the following two statements are equivalent:
(ⅰ) ˜TAδ is bounded from Bδp(Rn) to CMO(Rn);
(ⅱ) for any cube Q and z∈3Q∖2Q, there is
1|Q|∫Q|∑|β|=m1β!|DβA(x)−(DβA)Q|∫(4Q)cKβ(z,y)f(y)dy|dx≤C||f||Bδp, |
where Kβ(z,y)=(z−y)β|z−y|mK(z,y) for |β|=m.
Remark. Theorem 2 is also hold for nonhomogeneous Herz and Herz type Hardy space.
To prove the theorem, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 2. (see [5]) Let A be a function on Rn and DβA∈Lq(Rn) for |β|=m and some q>n. Then
|Rm(A;x,y)|≤C|x−y|m∑|β|=m(1|˜Q(x,y)|∫˜Q(x,y)|DβA(z)|qdz)1/q, |
where ˜Q(x,y) is the cube centered at x and having side length 5√n|x−y|.
Proof of Theorem 1. It suffices to prove that there exists a constant CQ such that
1|Q|∫Q|TAδ(f)(x)−CQ|dx≤C||f||Bδp |
holds for any cube Q=Q(0,d) with d>1. Fix a cube Q=Q(0,d) with d>1. Let ˜Q=5√nQ and ˜A(x)=A(x)−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA)˜Qxβ, then Rm+1(A;x,y)=Rm+1(˜A;x,y) and Dβ˜A=DβA−(DβA)˜Q for all β with |β|=m. We write, for f1=fχ˜Q and f2=fχRn∖˜Q,
TAδ(f)(x)=∫RnRm+1(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy=∫RnRm(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f1(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫RnK(x,y)(x−y)β|x−y|mDβ˜A(y)f1(y)dy+∫RnRm+1(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f2(y)dy, |
then
1|Q|∫Q|TAδ(f)(x)−T˜Aδ(f2)(0)|dx≤1|Q|∫Q|Tδ(Rm(˜A;x,⋅)|x−⋅|mf1)(x)|dx+∑|β|=m1β!1|Q|∫Q|Tδ((x−⋅)β|x−⋅|mDβ˜Af1)(x)|dx+|T˜Aδ(f2)(x)−T˜Aδ(f2)(0)|dx:=I+II+III. |
For I, note that for x∈Q and y∈˜Q, using Lemma 2, we get
Rm(˜A;x,y)≤C|x−y|m∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO, |
thus, by the Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn)-boundedness of TAδ for 1<p,q<∞ with 1/q=1/p−δ/n, we get
I≤C|Q|∫Q|Tδ(∑|β|=m||DβA||BMOf1)(x)|dx≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO(1|Q|∫Q|Tδ(f1)(x)|qdx)1/q≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO|Q|−1/q||f1||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMOr−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχ˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
For II, taking 1<s<p such that 1/r=1/s−δ/n, by the (Ls,Lr)-boundedness of Tδ and Holder's inequality, we gain
II≤C|Q|∫Q|Tδ(∑|β|=m(DβA−(DβA)˜Q)f1)(x)|dx≤C∑|β|=m(1|Q|∫Q|Tδ((DβA−(DβA)˜Q)f1)(x)|rdx)1/r≤C|Q|−1/r∑|β|=m||(DβA−(DβA)˜Q)f1||Ls≤C|Q|−1/r||f1||Lp∑|β|=m(1|Q|∫˜Q|DβA(y)−(DβA)˜Q|ps/(p−s)dy)(p−s)/(ps)|Q|(p−s)/(ps)≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMOr−n/q||fχ˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
To estimate III, we write
T˜Aδ(f2)(x)−T˜Aδ(f2)(0)=∫Rn[K(x,y)|x−y|m−K(0,y)|y|m]Rm(˜A;x,y)f2(y)dy+∫RnK(0,y)f2(y)|y|m[Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;0,y)]dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫Rn(K(x,y)(x−y)β|x−y|m−K(0,y)(−y)β|y|m)Dβ˜A(y)f2(y)dy:=III1+III2+III3. |
By Lemma 2 and the following inequality (see [15])
|bQ1−bQ2|≤Clog(|Q2|/|Q1|)||b||BMO for Q1⊂Q2, |
we know that, for x∈Q and y∈2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Q,
|Rm(˜A;x,y)|≤C|x−y|m∑|β|=m(||DβA||BMO+|(DβA)˜Q(x,y)−(DβA)˜Q|)≤Ck|x−y|m∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO. |
Note that |x−y|∼|y| for x∈Q and y∈Rn∖˜Q, we obtain, by the condition of K,
|III1|≤C∫Rn(|x||y|m+n+1−δ+|x|ε|y|m+n+ε−δ)|Rm(˜A;x,y)||f2(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=0∫2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Qk(|x||y|n+1−δ+|x|ε|y|n+ε−δ)|f(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=1k(2−k+2−εk)(2kr)−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχ2k˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=1k(2−k+2−εk)||f||Bδp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
For III2, by the formula (see [5]):
Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;x0,y)=∑|γ|<m1γ!Rm−|γ|(Dγ˜A;x,x0)(x−y)γ |
and Lemma 2, we have
|Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;x0,y)|≤C∑|γ|<m∑|β|=m|x−x0|m−|γ||x−y||γ|||DβA||BMO, |
thus, similar to the estimates of III1, we get
|III2|≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=0∫2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Q|x||y|n+1−δ|f(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
For III3, by Holder's inequality, similar to the estimates of III1, we get
|III3|≤C∑|β|=m∞∑k=0∫2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Q(|x||y|n+1−δ+|x|ε|y|n+ε−δ)|Dβ˜A(y)||f(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m∞∑k=1(2−k+2−εk)(2kr)−n(1/p−δ/n)(|2k˜Q|−1∫2k˜Q|DβA(y)−(DβA)˜Q|p′dy)1/p′||fχ2k˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=1(2−k+2−εk)(2kr)−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχ2k˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
Thus
III≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp, |
which together with the estimates for I and II yields the desired result. This finishes the proof of Theorem 1.
Proof of Theorem 2. Let f∈H˙Kp(Rn), by Lemma 1, f=∑∞j=−∞λjaj, where a′js are the central (n(1−1/p),p)-atom with suppaj⊂Bj=B(0,2j) and ||f||H˙Kp≈∑j|λj|. We write
||˜TAδ(f)||˙Kαq=∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)||χk˜TAδ(f)||Lq≤∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|||χk˜TAδ(aj)||Lq+∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)∞∑j=k|λj|||χk˜TAδ(aj)||Lq=J+JJ. |
For JJ, by the (Lp,Lq)-boundedness of ˜TAδ for 1/q=1/p−δ/n, we get
JJ≤C∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)∞∑j=k|λj|||aj||Lp≤C∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)∞∑j=k|λj|2jn(1/p−1)≤C∞∑j=−∞|λj|j∑k=−∞2(k−j)n(1−1/p)≤C∞∑j=−∞|λj|≤C||f||H˙Kp. |
To obtain the estimate of J, we denote that ˜A(x)=A(x)−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA)2Bjxβ. Then Qm(A;x,y)=Qm(˜A;x,y) and Qm+1(A;x,y)=Rm(A;x,y)−∑|β|=m1β!(x−y)βDβA(x). We write, by the vanishing moment of a and for x∈Ck with k≥j+1,
˜TAδ(aj)(x)=∫RnK(x,y)Rm(A;x,y)|x−y|maj(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫RnK(x,y)Dβ˜A(x)(x−y)β|x−y|maj(y)dy=∫Rn[K(x,y)|x−y|m−K(x,0)|x|m]Rm(˜A;x,y)aj(y)dy+∫RnK(x,0)|x|m[Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;x,0)]aj(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫Rn[K(x,y)(x−y)β|x−y|m−K(x,0)xβ|x|m]Dβ˜A(x)aj(y)dy. |
Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain
|˜TAδ(aj)(x)|≤C∫Rn[|y||x|m+n+1−δ+|y|ε|x|m+n+ε−δ]|Rm(˜A;x,y)||aj(y)|dy+C∑|β|=m∫Rn[|y||x|n+1−δ+|y|ε|x|n+ε−δ]|Dβ˜A(x)||aj(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]+C∑|β|=m[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]|Dβ˜A(x)|, |
thus
J≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]2kn/q+C∑|β|=m∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)](∫Bk|Dβ˜A(x)|qdx)1/q≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−δ/n)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑j=−∞|λj|∞∑k=j+1[2j−k+2(j−k)ε]≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑j=−∞|λj|≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||H˙Kp. |
This completes the proof of Theorem 2.
Proof of Theorem 3. For any cube Q=Q(0,r) with r>1, let f∈Bδp and ˜A(x)=A(x)−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA)˜Qxβ. We write, for f=fχ4Q+fχ(4Q)c=f1+f2 and z∈3Q∖2Q,
˜TAδ(f)(x)=˜TAδ(f1)(x)+∫RnRm(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f2(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA(x)−(DβA)Q)(Tδ,β(f2)(x)−Tδ,β(f2)(z))−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA(x)−(DβA)Q)Tδ,β(f2)(z)=I1(x)+I2(x)+I3(x,z)+I4(x,z), |
where Tδ,β is the singular integral operator with the kernel (x−y)β|x−y|mK(x,y) for |β|=m. Note that (I4(⋅,z))Q=0, we have
˜TAδ(f)(x)−(˜TAδ(f))Q=I1(x)−(I1(⋅))Q+I2(x)−I2(z)−[I2(⋅)−I2(z)]Q−I3(x,z)+(I3(x,z))Q−I4(x,z). |
By the (Lp,Lq)-bounded of ˜TAδ, we get
1|Q|∫Q|I1(x)|dx≤(1|Q|∫Q|˜TAδ(f1)(x)|qdx)1/q≤C|Q|−1/q||f1||Lp≤C||f||Bδp. |
Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain
|I2(x)−I2(z)|≤C||f||Bδp |
and
1|Q|∫Q|I3(x,z)|dx≤C||f||Bδp. |
Then integrating in x on Q and using the above estimates, we obtain the equivalence of the estimate
1|Q|∫Q|˜TAδ(f)(x)−(˜TAδ(f))Q|dx≤C||f||Bδp |
and the estimate
1|Q|∫Q|I4(x,z)|dx≤C||f||Bδp. |
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.
In this section we shall apply the theorems of the paper to some particular operators such as the Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator and fractional integral operator.
Application 1. Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator.
Let T be the Calderón-Zygmund operator defined by (see [10,11,15])
T(f)(x)=∫RnK(x,y)f(y)dy, |
the multilinear operator related to T is defined by
TA(f)(x)=∫RnRm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy. |
Then it is easily to see that T satisfies the conditions in Theorems 1–3, thus the conclusions of Theorems 1–3 hold for TA.
Application 2. Fractional integral operator with rough kernel.
For 0<δ<n, let Tδ be the fractional integral operator with rough kernel defined by (see [2,7])
Tδf(x)=∫RnΩ(x−y)|x−y|n−δf(y)dy, |
the multilinear operator related to Tδ is defined by
TAδf(x)=∫RnRm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|m+n−δΩ(x−y)f(y)dy, |
where Ω is homogeneous of degree zero on Rn, ∫Sn−1Ω(x′)dσ(x′)=0 and Ω∈Lipε(Sn−1) for some 0<ε≤1, that is there exists a constant M>0 such that for any x,y∈Sn−1, |Ω(x)−Ω(y)|≤M|x−y|ε. Then Tδ satisfies the conditions in Theorem 1. In fact, for suppf⊂(2Q)c and x∈Q=Q(x0,d), by the condition of Ω, we have (see [16])
|Ω(x−y)|x−y|n−δ−Ω(x0−y)|x0−y|n−δ|≤C(|x−x0|ε|x0−y|n+ε−δ+|x−x0||x0−y|n+1−δ), |
thus, the conclusions of Theorems 1–3 hold for TAδ.
The author would like to express his deep gratitude to the referee for his/her valuable comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11901126), the Scientific Research Funds of Hunan Provincial Education Department. (Grant No. 19B509).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | J. Klafter, S. Lim, R. Metzler, Fractional dynamics: Recent advances, World Scientific, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1142/8087 |
[2] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, Academic Press, 1999. |
[3] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, 204. Elsevier, 2006. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(06)80001-0 |
[4] |
D. Valério, M. D. Ortigueira, A. M. Lopes, How many fractional derivatives are there, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050737 doi: 10.3390/math10050737
![]() |
[5] | F. Mainardi, Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity: An introduction to mathematical models, World Scientific, 2010. |
[6] | X. J. Yang, General fractional derivatives: Theory, methods and applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429284083 |
[7] | D. Baleanu, J. A. T. Machado, A. C. Luo, Fractional dynamics and control, Springer Science Business Media, 2012. |
[8] | A. O. Akdemir, H. Dutta, A. Atangana, Fractional order analysis: Theory, methods and applications, John Wiley Sons, 2020. |
[9] |
S. Ahmad, A. Ullah, K. Shah, S. Salahshour, A. Ahmadian, T. Ciano, Fuzzy fractional-order model of the novel coronavirus, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02934-0 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02934-0
![]() |
[10] |
M. R. Shahriyar, F. Ismail, S. Aghabeigi, A. Ahmadian, S. Salahshour, An eigenvalue-eigenvector method for solving a system of fractional differential equations with uncertainty, Math. Probl. Eng., 2013 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/579761 doi: 10.1155/2013/579761
![]() |
[11] |
H. Baghani, J. Alzabut, J. Farokhi-Ostad, J. J. Nieto, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a coupled system of sequential fractional differential equations with initial conditions, J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl., 11(2020), 1731–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11868-020-00359-7 doi: 10.1007/s11868-020-00359-7
![]() |
[12] |
M. M. Matar, J. Alzabut, J. M. Jonnalagadda, A coupled system of nonlinear Caputo-Hadamard Langevin equations associated with nonperiodic boundary conditions, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 2650–2670. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6711 doi: 10.1002/mma.6711
![]() |
[13] |
J. Alzabut, B. Ahmad, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, A. Zada, Novel existence techniques on the generalized φ-Caputo fractional inclusion boundary problem, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03301-3 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03301-3
![]() |
[14] |
H. Afshari, H. R. Marasi, J. Alzabut, Applications of new contraction mappings on existence and uniqueness results for implicit ϕ-Hilfer fractional pantograph differential equations, J. Inequal. Appl., 2021 (2021), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-021-02711-x doi: 10.1186/s13660-021-02711-x
![]() |
[15] |
B. Ahmad, M. Alghanmi, A. Alsaedi, J. J. Nieto, Existence and uniqueness results for a nonlinear coupled system involving Caputo fractional derivatives with a new kind of coupled boundary conditions, Appl. Math. Lett., 116 (2021), 107018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107018 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107018
![]() |
[16] |
J. Hristov, Transient heat diffusion with a non-singular fading memory: from the Cattaneo constitutive equation with Jeffrey's kernel to the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional derivative, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 757–762. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160112019H doi: 10.2298/TSCI160112019H
![]() |
[17] |
J. Hristov, Steady-state heat conduction in a medium with spatial non-singular fading memory: Derivation of Caputo-Fabrizio space-fractional derivative from Cattaneo concept with Jeffreys Kernel and analytical solutions, Therm. Sci., 21 (2017), 827–839. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160229115H doi: 10.2298/TSCI160229115H
![]() |
[18] |
M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
![]() |
[19] |
A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci. 20 (2016), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
![]() |
[20] |
S. Ahmad, A. Ullah, M. Arfan, K. Shah, On analysis of the fractional mathematical model of rotavirus epidemic with the effects of breastfeeding and vaccination under Atangana-Baleanu (AB) derivative, Chaos Solition. Fract., 140 (2020), 110233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110233 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110233
![]() |
[21] |
O. J. J. Algahtani, Comparing the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with fractional order: Allen Cahn model, Chaos Solition. Fract., 89 (2016), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026
![]() |
[22] |
N. Sheikh, F. Ali, M. Saqib, I. Khan, S. Jan, A. Alshomrani, M. Alghamdi, Comparison and analysis of the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives for generalized Casson fluid model with heat generation and chemical reaction, Results Phys., 7 (2017), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.01.025 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.01.025
![]() |
[23] |
J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010202 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010202
![]() |
[24] |
T. Abdeljawad, Fractional operators with exponential kernels and a Lyapunov type inequality, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2017 (2017), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1285-0 doi: 10.1186/s13662-017-1285-0
![]() |
[25] | J. Hristov, Frontiers in fractional calculus, Bentham Science Publishers, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681085999118010013 |
[26] |
T. M. Atanacković, S. Pillipović, D. Zorica, Properties of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and its distributional settings, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 21 (2018), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2018-0003 doi: 10.1515/fca-2018-0003
![]() |
[27] |
D. Baleanu, A. Mousalou, S. Rezapour, The extended fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivative of order 0≤σ<1 on CR[0,1] and the existence of solutions for two higher-order series-type differential equations, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1696-6 doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1696-6
![]() |
[28] |
M. Higazy, M. Alyami, New Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order SEIASqEqHR model for COVID-19 epidemic transmission with genetic algorithm based control strategy, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 4719–4736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.034 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.034
![]() |
[29] |
S. Ahmad, A. Ullah, M. Partohaghighi, S. Saifullah, A. Akgül, F. Jarad, Oscillatory and complex behaviour of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order HIV-1 infection model, AIMS. Math., 7 (2021), 4778–4792. https://doi.org/ 10.3934/math.2022265 doi: 10.3934/math.2022265
![]() |
[30] |
Y. M. Chu, M. F. Khan, S. Ullah, S. A. A. Shah, M. Farooq, M. bin Mamat, Mathematical assessment of a fractional-order vector–host disease model with the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8507 doi: 10.1002/mma.8507
![]() |
[31] |
D. Baleanu, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A fractional differential equation model for the COVID-19 transmission by using the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02762-2 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02762-2
![]() |
[32] |
D. Baleanu, A. Jajarmi, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A new study on the mathematical modelling of human liver with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Chaos Solition. Fract., 134 (2020), 109705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705
![]() |
[33] |
M. A. Dokuyucu, E. Celik, H. Bulut, H. M. Baskonus, Cancer treatment model with the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-11950-y doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2018-11950-y
![]() |
[34] |
M. M. Bekkouche, I. Mansouri, A. Ahmed, Numerical solution of fractional boundary value problem with Caputo-Fabrizio and its fractional integral, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 133 (2022), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-022-01708-z doi: 10.1007/s12190-022-01708-z
![]() |
[35] |
F. Youbi, S. Momani, S. Hasan, M. A. Smadi, Effective numerical technique for nonlinear Caputo-Fabrizio systems of fractional Volterra integro-differential equations in Hilbert space, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 1778–1786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.086 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.086
![]() |
[36] |
S. Qureshi, N. A. Rangaig, D. Baleanu, New numerical aspects of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative operator, Math., 7 (2019), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7040374 doi: 10.3390/math7040374
![]() |
[37] |
A. Atangana, K. Owolabi, New numerical approach for fractional differential equations, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 13 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2018010 doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2018010
![]() |
[38] |
Y. Liu, E. Fan, B. Yin, H. Li, Fast algorithm based on the novel approximation formula for the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, AIMS. Math., 5(2020), 1729–1744. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020117 doi: 10.3934/math.2020117
![]() |
[39] |
A. Shaikh, A. Tassaddiq, K. S. Nisar, D. Baleanu, Analysis of differential equations involving Caputo-Fabrizio fractional operator and its applications to reaction-diffusion equations, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2019 (2019), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2115-3 doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2115-3
![]() |
[40] |
K. Liu, M. Fečkan, D. O'Regan, J. Wang, Hyers-Ulam stability and existence of solutions for differential equations with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Math., 7 (2019), 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csfx.2020.100040 doi: 10.1016/j.csfx.2020.100040
![]() |
[41] |
S. Abbas, M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, Random Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential inclusions, Math. Model. Control, 1 (2021), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.3934/mmc.2021008 doi: 10.3934/mmc.2021008
![]() |
[42] |
S. Wang, The Ulam stability of fractional differential equation with the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7268518 doi: 10.1155/2022/7268518
![]() |
[43] |
T. Sitthiwirattham, R. Gul, K. Shah, I. Mahariq, J. Soontharanon, K. J. Ansari, Study of implicit-impulsive differential equations involving Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, AIMS. Math., 7 (2022), 4017–4037. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022222 doi: 10.3934/math.2022222
![]() |
[44] |
K. Maazouz, R. R. López, Differential equations of arbitrary order under Caputo-Fabrizio derivative: Some existence results and study of stability, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 6234–6251. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022291 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022291
![]() |
[45] |
K. Shah, M. Sarwar, D. Baleanu, Study on Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem for Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02624-x doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02624-x
![]() |
[46] |
R. Gul, M. Sarwar, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, F. Jarad, Qualitative analysis of implicit dirichlet boundary value problem for Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations, J. Funct. Spaces, 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4714032 doi: 10.1155/2020/4714032
![]() |
[47] |
A. Alsaedi, D. Baleanu, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, On coupled systems of time-fractional differential problems by using a new fractional derivative, J. Funct. Spaces, 2016 (2016), 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4626940 doi: 10.1155/2016/4626940
![]() |
[48] |
S. Abbas, M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, Coupled Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential systems in generalized Banach spaces, Malaya J. Mat., 9 (2021), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.26637/MJM0901/0003 doi: 10.26637/MJM0901/0003
![]() |
[49] | M. Krasnoselskii, Two remarks on the method of successive approximations, Uspekhi Mate. Nauk, 10 (1955), 123–127. |