In this paper, we establish a non-autonomous Hassell-Varley-Holling type predator-prey system with mutual interference. We construct some sufficient conditions for the permanence, extinction and globally asymptotic stability of system by use of the comparison theorem and an appropriate Liapunov function. Then the sufficient and necessary conditions for a periodic solution of the system are obtained via coincidence degree theorem. Finally, the correctness of the previous conclusions are demonstrated by some numerical cases.
Citation: Luoyi Wu, Hang Zheng, Songchuan Zhang. Dynamics of a non-autonomous predator-prey system with Hassell-Varley-Holling Ⅱ function response and mutual interference[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6033-6049. doi: 10.3934/math.2021355
[1] | Muhammad Asim, Ghada AlNemer . Boundedness on variable exponent Morrey-Herz space for fractional multilinear Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 117-136. doi: 10.3934/math.2025007 |
[2] | Jie Sun, Jiamei Chen . Weighted estimates for commutators associated to singular integral operator satisfying a variant of Hörmander's condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25714-25728. doi: 10.3934/math.20231311 |
[3] | Kieu Huu Dung, Do Lu Cong Minh, Pham Thi Kim Thuy . Commutators of Hardy-Cesàro operators on Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19147-19166. doi: 10.3934/math.20221051 |
[4] | Yueping Zhu, Yan Tang, Lixin Jiang . Boundedness of multilinear Calderón-Zygmund singular operators on weighted Lebesgue spaces and Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11246-11262. doi: 10.3934/math.2021652 |
[5] | Wanjing Zhang, Suixin He, Jing Zhang . Boundedness of sublinear operators on weighted grand Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17381-17401. doi: 10.3934/math.2023888 |
[6] | Babar Sultan, Mehvish Sultan, Qian-Qian Zhang, Nabil Mlaiki . Boundedness of Hardy operators on grand variable weighted Herz spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24515-24527. doi: 10.3934/math.20231250 |
[7] | Javeria Younas, Amjad Hussain, Hadil Alhazmi, A. F. Aljohani, Ilyas Khan . BMO estimates for commutators of the rough fractional Hausdorff operator on grand-variable-Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23434-23448. doi: 10.3934/math.20241139 |
[8] | Ming Liu, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yao . Weighted variable Morrey-Herz space estimates for mth order commutators of n−dimensional fractional Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20063-20079. doi: 10.3934/math.20231022 |
[9] | Shuhui Yang, Yan Lin . Multilinear strongly singular integral operators with generalized kernels and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13533-13551. doi: 10.3934/math.2021786 |
[10] | Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam . Some weighted estimates for the commutators of p-adic Hardy operator on two weighted p-adic Herz-type spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9633-9646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021561 |
In this paper, we establish a non-autonomous Hassell-Varley-Holling type predator-prey system with mutual interference. We construct some sufficient conditions for the permanence, extinction and globally asymptotic stability of system by use of the comparison theorem and an appropriate Liapunov function. Then the sufficient and necessary conditions for a periodic solution of the system are obtained via coincidence degree theorem. Finally, the correctness of the previous conclusions are demonstrated by some numerical cases.
Let T be the Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator and b be a locally integrable function on Rn. The commutator generated by b and T is defined by [b,T]f=bT(f)−T(bf). The investigation of the commutator begins with Coifman-Rochberg-Weiss pioneering study and classical result (see [6]). The classical result of Coifman, Rochberg and Weiss (see [6]) states that the commutator [b,T]f=T(bf)−bTf is bounded on Lp(Rn) for 1<p<∞ if and only if b∈BMO(Rn). The major reason for considering the problem of commutators is that the boundedness of commutator can produces some characterizations of function spaces (see [1,6]). Chanillo (see [1]) proves a similar result when T is replaced by the fractional integral operator. In [11], the boundedness properties of the commutators for the extreme values of p are obtained. In recent years, the theory of Herz space and Herz type Hardy space, as a local version of Lebesgue space and Hardy space, have been developed (see [8,9,12,13]). The main purpose of this paper is to establish the endpoint continuity properties of some multilinear operators related to certain non-convolution type fractional singular integral operators on Herz and Herz type Hardy spaces.
First, let us introduce some notations (see [8,9,10,12,13,15]). Throughout this paper, Q will denote a cube of Rn with sides parallel to the axes. For a cube Q and a locally integrable function f, let fQ=|Q|−1∫Qf(x)dx and f#(x)=supQ∋x|Q|−1∫Q|f(y)−fQ|dy. Moreover, f is said to belong to BMO(Rn) if f#∈L∞ and define ||f||BMO=||f#||L∞; We also define the central BMO space by CMO(Rn), which is the space of those functions f∈Lloc(Rn) such that
||f||CMO=supr>1|Q(0,r)|−1∫Q|f(y)−fQ|dy<∞. |
It is well-known that (see [9,10])
||f||CMO≈supr>1infc∈C|Q(0,r)|−1∫Q|f(x)−c|dx. |
For k∈Z, define Bk={x∈Rn:|x|≤2k} and Ck=Bk∖Bk−1. Denote by χk the characteristic function of Ck and ˜χk the characteristic function of Ck for k≥1 and ˜χ0 the characteristic function of B0.
Definition 1. Let 0<p<∞ and α∈R.
(1) The homogeneous Herz space ˙Kαp(Rn) is defined by
˙Kαp(Rn)={f∈Lploc(Rn∖{0}):||f||˙Kαp<∞}, |
where
||f||˙Kαp=∞∑k=−∞2kα||fχk||Lp; |
(2) The nonhomogeneous Herz space Kαp(Rn) is defined by
Kαp(Rn)={f∈Lploc(Rn):||f||Kαp<∞}, |
where
||f||Kαp=∞∑k=02kα||f˜χk||Lp. |
If α=n(1−1/p), we denote that ˙Kαp(Rn)=˙Kp(Rn), Kαp(Rn)=Kp(Rn).
Definition 2. Let 0<δ<n and 1<p<n/δ. We shall call Bδp(Rn) the space of those functions f on Rn such that
||f||Bδp=supd>1d−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχQ(0,d)||Lp<∞. |
Definition 3. Let 1<p<∞.
(1) The homogeneous Herz type Hardy space H˙Kp(Rn) is defined by
H˙Kp(Rn)={f∈S′(Rn):G(f)∈˙Kp(Rn)}, |
where
||f||H˙Kp=||G(f)||˙Kp. |
(2) The nonhomogeneous Herz type Hardy space HKp(Rn) is defined by
HKp(Rn)={f∈S′(Rn):G(f)∈Kp(Rn)}, |
where
||f||HKp=||G(f)||Kp. |
where G(f) is the grand maximal function of f.
The Herz type Hardy spaces have the atomic decomposition characterization.
Definition 4. Let 1<p<∞. A function a(x) on Rn is called a central (n(1−1/p),p)-atom (or a central (n(1−1/p),p)-atom of restrict type), if
1) Suppa⊂B(0,d) for some d>0 (or for some d≥1),
2) ||a||Lp≤|B(0,d)|1/p−1,
3) ∫a(x)dx=0.
Lemma 1. (see [9,13]) Let 1<p<∞. A temperate distribution f belongs to H˙Kp(Rn)(or HKp(Rn)) if and only if there exist central (n(1−1/p),p)-atoms(or central (n(1−1/p),p)-atoms of restrict type) aj supported on Bj=B(0,2j) and constants λj, ∑j|λj|<∞ such that f=∑∞j=−∞λjaj (or f=∑∞j=0λjaj)in the S′(Rn) sense, and
||f||H˙Kp( or ||f||HKp)≈∑j|λj|. |
In this paper, we will consider a class of multilinear operators related to some non-convolution type singular integral operators, whose definition are following.
Let m be a positive integer and A be a function on Rn. We denote that
Rm+1(A;x,y)=A(x)−∑|β|≤m1β!DβA(y)(x−y)β |
and
Qm+1(A;x,y)=Rm(A;x,y)−∑|β|=m1β!DβA(x)(x−y)β. |
Definition 5. Fixed ε>0 and 0<δ<n. Let Tδ:S→S′ be a linear operator. Tδ is called a fractional singular integral operator if there exists a locally integrable function K(x,y) on Rn×Rn such that
Tδ(f)(x)=∫RnK(x,y)f(y)dy |
for every bounded and compactly supported function f, where K satisfies:
|K(x,y)|≤C|x−y|−n+δ |
and
|K(y,x)−K(z,x)|+|K(x,y)−K(x,z)|≤C|y−z|ε|x−z|−n−ε+δ |
if 2|y−z|≤|x−z|. The multilinear operator related to the fractional singular integral operator Tδ is defined by
TAδ(f)(x)=∫RnRm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy; |
We also consider the variant of TAδ, which is defined by
˜TAδ(f)(x)=∫RnQm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy. |
Note that when m=0, TAδ is just the commutators of Tδ and A (see [1,6,11,14]). It is well known that multilinear operator, as a non-trivial extension of commutator, is of great interest in harmonic analysis and has been widely studied by many authors (see [3,4,5]). In [7], the weighted Lp(p>1)-boundedness of the multilinear operator related to some singular integral operator are obtained. In [2], the weak (H1, L1)-boundedness of the multilinear operator related to some singular integral operator are obtained. In this paper, we will study the endpoint continuity properties of the multilinear operators TAδ and ˜TAδ on Herz and Herz type Hardy spaces.
Now we state our results as following.
Theorem 1. Let 0<δ<n, 1<p<n/δ and DβA∈BMO(Rn) for all β with |β|=m. Suppose that TAδ is the same as in Definition 5 such that Tδ is bounded from Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn) for any p,q∈(1,+∞] with 1/q=1/p−δ/n. Then TAδ is bounded from Bδp(Rn) to CMO(Rn).
Theorem 2. Let 0<δ<n, 1<p<n/δ, 1/q=1/p−δ/n and DβA∈BMO(Rn) for all β with |β|=m. Suppose that ˜TAδ is the same as in Definition 5 such that ˜TAδ is bounded from Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn) for any p,q∈(1,+∞) with 1/q=1/p−δ/n. Then ˜TAδ is bounded from H˙Kp(Rn) to ˙Kαq(Rn) with α=n(1−1/p).
Theorem 3. Let 0<δ<n, 1<p<n/δ and DβA∈BMO(Rn) for all β with |β|=m. Suppose that ˜TAδ is the same as in Definition 5 such that ˜TAδ is bounded from Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn) for any p,q∈(1,+∞) with 1/q=1/p−δ/n. Then the following two statements are equivalent:
(ⅰ) ˜TAδ is bounded from Bδp(Rn) to CMO(Rn);
(ⅱ) for any cube Q and z∈3Q∖2Q, there is
1|Q|∫Q|∑|β|=m1β!|DβA(x)−(DβA)Q|∫(4Q)cKβ(z,y)f(y)dy|dx≤C||f||Bδp, |
where Kβ(z,y)=(z−y)β|z−y|mK(z,y) for |β|=m.
Remark. Theorem 2 is also hold for nonhomogeneous Herz and Herz type Hardy space.
To prove the theorem, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 2. (see [5]) Let A be a function on Rn and DβA∈Lq(Rn) for |β|=m and some q>n. Then
|Rm(A;x,y)|≤C|x−y|m∑|β|=m(1|˜Q(x,y)|∫˜Q(x,y)|DβA(z)|qdz)1/q, |
where ˜Q(x,y) is the cube centered at x and having side length 5√n|x−y|.
Proof of Theorem 1. It suffices to prove that there exists a constant CQ such that
1|Q|∫Q|TAδ(f)(x)−CQ|dx≤C||f||Bδp |
holds for any cube Q=Q(0,d) with d>1. Fix a cube Q=Q(0,d) with d>1. Let ˜Q=5√nQ and ˜A(x)=A(x)−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA)˜Qxβ, then Rm+1(A;x,y)=Rm+1(˜A;x,y) and Dβ˜A=DβA−(DβA)˜Q for all β with |β|=m. We write, for f1=fχ˜Q and f2=fχRn∖˜Q,
TAδ(f)(x)=∫RnRm+1(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy=∫RnRm(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f1(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫RnK(x,y)(x−y)β|x−y|mDβ˜A(y)f1(y)dy+∫RnRm+1(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f2(y)dy, |
then
1|Q|∫Q|TAδ(f)(x)−T˜Aδ(f2)(0)|dx≤1|Q|∫Q|Tδ(Rm(˜A;x,⋅)|x−⋅|mf1)(x)|dx+∑|β|=m1β!1|Q|∫Q|Tδ((x−⋅)β|x−⋅|mDβ˜Af1)(x)|dx+|T˜Aδ(f2)(x)−T˜Aδ(f2)(0)|dx:=I+II+III. |
For I, note that for x∈Q and y∈˜Q, using Lemma 2, we get
Rm(˜A;x,y)≤C|x−y|m∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO, |
thus, by the Lp(Rn) to Lq(Rn)-boundedness of TAδ for 1<p,q<∞ with 1/q=1/p−δ/n, we get
I≤C|Q|∫Q|Tδ(∑|β|=m||DβA||BMOf1)(x)|dx≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO(1|Q|∫Q|Tδ(f1)(x)|qdx)1/q≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO|Q|−1/q||f1||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMOr−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχ˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
For II, taking 1<s<p such that 1/r=1/s−δ/n, by the (Ls,Lr)-boundedness of Tδ and Holder's inequality, we gain
II≤C|Q|∫Q|Tδ(∑|β|=m(DβA−(DβA)˜Q)f1)(x)|dx≤C∑|β|=m(1|Q|∫Q|Tδ((DβA−(DβA)˜Q)f1)(x)|rdx)1/r≤C|Q|−1/r∑|β|=m||(DβA−(DβA)˜Q)f1||Ls≤C|Q|−1/r||f1||Lp∑|β|=m(1|Q|∫˜Q|DβA(y)−(DβA)˜Q|ps/(p−s)dy)(p−s)/(ps)|Q|(p−s)/(ps)≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMOr−n/q||fχ˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
To estimate III, we write
T˜Aδ(f2)(x)−T˜Aδ(f2)(0)=∫Rn[K(x,y)|x−y|m−K(0,y)|y|m]Rm(˜A;x,y)f2(y)dy+∫RnK(0,y)f2(y)|y|m[Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;0,y)]dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫Rn(K(x,y)(x−y)β|x−y|m−K(0,y)(−y)β|y|m)Dβ˜A(y)f2(y)dy:=III1+III2+III3. |
By Lemma 2 and the following inequality (see [15])
|bQ1−bQ2|≤Clog(|Q2|/|Q1|)||b||BMO for Q1⊂Q2, |
we know that, for x∈Q and y∈2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Q,
|Rm(˜A;x,y)|≤C|x−y|m∑|β|=m(||DβA||BMO+|(DβA)˜Q(x,y)−(DβA)˜Q|)≤Ck|x−y|m∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO. |
Note that |x−y|∼|y| for x∈Q and y∈Rn∖˜Q, we obtain, by the condition of K,
|III1|≤C∫Rn(|x||y|m+n+1−δ+|x|ε|y|m+n+ε−δ)|Rm(˜A;x,y)||f2(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=0∫2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Qk(|x||y|n+1−δ+|x|ε|y|n+ε−δ)|f(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=1k(2−k+2−εk)(2kr)−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχ2k˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=1k(2−k+2−εk)||f||Bδp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
For III2, by the formula (see [5]):
Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;x0,y)=∑|γ|<m1γ!Rm−|γ|(Dγ˜A;x,x0)(x−y)γ |
and Lemma 2, we have
|Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;x0,y)|≤C∑|γ|<m∑|β|=m|x−x0|m−|γ||x−y||γ|||DβA||BMO, |
thus, similar to the estimates of III1, we get
|III2|≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=0∫2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Q|x||y|n+1−δ|f(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
For III3, by Holder's inequality, similar to the estimates of III1, we get
|III3|≤C∑|β|=m∞∑k=0∫2k+1˜Q∖2k˜Q(|x||y|n+1−δ+|x|ε|y|n+ε−δ)|Dβ˜A(y)||f(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m∞∑k=1(2−k+2−εk)(2kr)−n(1/p−δ/n)(|2k˜Q|−1∫2k˜Q|DβA(y)−(DβA)˜Q|p′dy)1/p′||fχ2k˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=1(2−k+2−εk)(2kr)−n(1/p−δ/n)||fχ2k˜Q||Lp≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp. |
Thus
III≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||Bδp, |
which together with the estimates for I and II yields the desired result. This finishes the proof of Theorem 1.
Proof of Theorem 2. Let f∈H˙Kp(Rn), by Lemma 1, f=∑∞j=−∞λjaj, where a′js are the central (n(1−1/p),p)-atom with suppaj⊂Bj=B(0,2j) and ||f||H˙Kp≈∑j|λj|. We write
||˜TAδ(f)||˙Kαq=∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)||χk˜TAδ(f)||Lq≤∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|||χk˜TAδ(aj)||Lq+∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)∞∑j=k|λj|||χk˜TAδ(aj)||Lq=J+JJ. |
For JJ, by the (Lp,Lq)-boundedness of ˜TAδ for 1/q=1/p−δ/n, we get
JJ≤C∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)∞∑j=k|λj|||aj||Lp≤C∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)∞∑j=k|λj|2jn(1/p−1)≤C∞∑j=−∞|λj|j∑k=−∞2(k−j)n(1−1/p)≤C∞∑j=−∞|λj|≤C||f||H˙Kp. |
To obtain the estimate of J, we denote that ˜A(x)=A(x)−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA)2Bjxβ. Then Qm(A;x,y)=Qm(˜A;x,y) and Qm+1(A;x,y)=Rm(A;x,y)−∑|β|=m1β!(x−y)βDβA(x). We write, by the vanishing moment of a and for x∈Ck with k≥j+1,
˜TAδ(aj)(x)=∫RnK(x,y)Rm(A;x,y)|x−y|maj(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫RnK(x,y)Dβ˜A(x)(x−y)β|x−y|maj(y)dy=∫Rn[K(x,y)|x−y|m−K(x,0)|x|m]Rm(˜A;x,y)aj(y)dy+∫RnK(x,0)|x|m[Rm(˜A;x,y)−Rm(˜A;x,0)]aj(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!∫Rn[K(x,y)(x−y)β|x−y|m−K(x,0)xβ|x|m]Dβ˜A(x)aj(y)dy. |
Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain
|˜TAδ(aj)(x)|≤C∫Rn[|y||x|m+n+1−δ+|y|ε|x|m+n+ε−δ]|Rm(˜A;x,y)||aj(y)|dy+C∑|β|=m∫Rn[|y||x|n+1−δ+|y|ε|x|n+ε−δ]|Dβ˜A(x)||aj(y)|dy≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]+C∑|β|=m[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]|Dβ˜A(x)|, |
thus
J≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]2kn/q+C∑|β|=m∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−1/p)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)](∫Bk|Dβ˜A(x)|qdx)1/q≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑k=−∞2kn(1−δ/n)k−1∑j=−∞|λj|[2j2k(n+1−δ)+2jε2k(n+ε−δ)]≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑j=−∞|λj|∞∑k=j+1[2j−k+2(j−k)ε]≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO∞∑j=−∞|λj|≤C∑|β|=m||DβA||BMO||f||H˙Kp. |
This completes the proof of Theorem 2.
Proof of Theorem 3. For any cube Q=Q(0,r) with r>1, let f∈Bδp and ˜A(x)=A(x)−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA)˜Qxβ. We write, for f=fχ4Q+fχ(4Q)c=f1+f2 and z∈3Q∖2Q,
˜TAδ(f)(x)=˜TAδ(f1)(x)+∫RnRm(˜A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f2(y)dy−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA(x)−(DβA)Q)(Tδ,β(f2)(x)−Tδ,β(f2)(z))−∑|β|=m1β!(DβA(x)−(DβA)Q)Tδ,β(f2)(z)=I1(x)+I2(x)+I3(x,z)+I4(x,z), |
where Tδ,β is the singular integral operator with the kernel (x−y)β|x−y|mK(x,y) for |β|=m. Note that (I4(⋅,z))Q=0, we have
˜TAδ(f)(x)−(˜TAδ(f))Q=I1(x)−(I1(⋅))Q+I2(x)−I2(z)−[I2(⋅)−I2(z)]Q−I3(x,z)+(I3(x,z))Q−I4(x,z). |
By the (Lp,Lq)-bounded of ˜TAδ, we get
1|Q|∫Q|I1(x)|dx≤(1|Q|∫Q|˜TAδ(f1)(x)|qdx)1/q≤C|Q|−1/q||f1||Lp≤C||f||Bδp. |
Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain
|I2(x)−I2(z)|≤C||f||Bδp |
and
1|Q|∫Q|I3(x,z)|dx≤C||f||Bδp. |
Then integrating in x on Q and using the above estimates, we obtain the equivalence of the estimate
1|Q|∫Q|˜TAδ(f)(x)−(˜TAδ(f))Q|dx≤C||f||Bδp |
and the estimate
1|Q|∫Q|I4(x,z)|dx≤C||f||Bδp. |
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.
In this section we shall apply the theorems of the paper to some particular operators such as the Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator and fractional integral operator.
Application 1. Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operator.
Let T be the Calderón-Zygmund operator defined by (see [10,11,15])
T(f)(x)=∫RnK(x,y)f(y)dy, |
the multilinear operator related to T is defined by
TA(f)(x)=∫RnRm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|mK(x,y)f(y)dy. |
Then it is easily to see that T satisfies the conditions in Theorems 1–3, thus the conclusions of Theorems 1–3 hold for TA.
Application 2. Fractional integral operator with rough kernel.
For 0<δ<n, let Tδ be the fractional integral operator with rough kernel defined by (see [2,7])
Tδf(x)=∫RnΩ(x−y)|x−y|n−δf(y)dy, |
the multilinear operator related to Tδ is defined by
TAδf(x)=∫RnRm+1(A;x,y)|x−y|m+n−δΩ(x−y)f(y)dy, |
where Ω is homogeneous of degree zero on Rn, ∫Sn−1Ω(x′)dσ(x′)=0 and Ω∈Lipε(Sn−1) for some 0<ε≤1, that is there exists a constant M>0 such that for any x,y∈Sn−1, |Ω(x)−Ω(y)|≤M|x−y|ε. Then Tδ satisfies the conditions in Theorem 1. In fact, for suppf⊂(2Q)c and x∈Q=Q(x0,d), by the condition of Ω, we have (see [16])
|Ω(x−y)|x−y|n−δ−Ω(x0−y)|x0−y|n−δ|≤C(|x−x0|ε|x0−y|n+ε−δ+|x−x0||x0−y|n+1−δ), |
thus, the conclusions of Theorems 1–3 hold for TAδ.
The author would like to express his deep gratitude to the referee for his/her valuable comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11901126), the Scientific Research Funds of Hunan Provincial Education Department. (Grant No. 19B509).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | C. Holling, The functional response of predator to prey density and its role in mimicy and population regulation, J. Men. Ent. Sec. Can., 45 (1965), 1–60. |
[2] |
F. Wei, Existence of multiple positive periodic solutions to a periodic predator-prey system with harvesting terms and Holling Ⅲ type functional response, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16 (2011), 2130–2138. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.08.028
![]() |
[3] |
F. Chen, Y. Chen, J. Shi, Stability of the boundary solution of a nonautonomous predator-prey system with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 344 (2008), 1057–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.050
![]() |
[4] |
H. Alsakaji, S. Kundu, F. Rihan, Delay differential model of one-predator two-prey system with Monod-Haldane and holling type Ⅱ functional responses, Appl. Math. Comput., 397 (2021), 125919. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125919
![]() |
[5] |
Z. Du, Z. Feng, Periodic solutions of a neutral impulsive predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response with delays, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 258 (2014), 87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.09.008
![]() |
[6] |
H. Guo, X. Chen, Existence and global attractivity of positive periodic solution for a Volterra model with mutual interference and Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 5830–5837. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2010.12.065
![]() |
[7] | J. Song, Y. Xia, Y. Bai, Y. Cai, D. O'Regan, A non-autonomous Leslie-Gower model with Holling type Ⅳ functional response and harvesting complexity, Adv. Differ. Equations, 1 (2019), 1–12. |
[8] |
F. Wei, Q. Fu, Hopf bifurcation and stability for predator-prey systems with Beddington-DeAngelis type functional response and stage structure for prey incorporating refuge, Appl. Math. Model, 40 (2016), 126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.04.042
![]() |
[9] |
S. Yuan, Y. Song, Stability and Hopf bifurcations in a delayed Leslie-Gower predator-prey system, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 355 (2009), 82–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.01.052
![]() |
[10] | F. Rihan, H. Alsakaji, C. Rajivganthi, Stability and hopf bifurcation of three-species prey-predator System with time delays and Allee Effect, Complexity, (2020), 7306412. |
[11] |
H. Qi, X. Meng, Threshold behavior of a stochastic predator-prey system with prey refuge and fear effect, Appl. Math. Lett., 113 (2021), 106846. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106846
![]() |
[12] |
W. Lu, Y. Xia, Y. Bai, Periodic solution of a stage-structured predator-prey model incorporating prey refuge, Math. Biosci. Eng., 17 (2020), 3160–3174. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020179
![]() |
[13] |
Y. Xia, J. Cao, S. Cheng, Multiple periodic solutious of prelayed stage-tructured predator-prey model with nonmonotone functional responses, Appl. Math. Model., 31 (2007), 1947–1959. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2006.08.012
![]() |
[14] |
Z. Li, K. Zhao, Y. Li, Multiple positive periodic solutions for a non-autonomous stage-structured predator-prey system with harvesting terms, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 15 (2010), 2140–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.08.019
![]() |
[15] |
Y. Chen, Multiple periodic solution of delayed predator-prey systems with type Ⅳ functional responses, Nonlinear Anal., 5 (2004), 45–53. doi: 10.1016/S1468-1218(03)00014-2
![]() |
[16] |
S. Yuan, F. Zhang, Stability and global Hopf bifurcation in a delayed predator-prey system, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 11 (2010), 959–977. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.01.038
![]() |
[17] |
L. Nie, Z. Teng, L. Hu, J. Peng, The dynamics of a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with state dependent impulsive harvest for predator, Biosystems, 98 (2009), 67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.06.001
![]() |
[18] | F. Chen, X. Chen, Y. Zhang, Positive periodic solution of a delayed predator-prey system with Holling type Ⅱ functional response and stage structure for predator, Acta Math. Sci., 26 (2006), 93–103. |
[19] |
Y. Song, X. Tang, Stability, Steady-State Bifurcations and Turing Patterns in a Predator-Prey Model with Herd Behavior and Prey-taxis, Stud. Appl. Math., 139 (2017), 371–404. doi: 10.1111/sapm.12165
![]() |
[20] | T. Ma, X. Meng, Z. Chang, Dynamics and optimal harvesting control for a stochastic one-predator-two-prey time delay system with jumps, Complexity, 2019 (2019), 5342031. |
[21] |
G. Liu, H. Qi, Z. Chang, X. Meng, Asymptotic stability of a stochastic may mutualism system, Comput. Math. Appl., 79 (2020), 735–745. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.07.022
![]() |
[22] |
M. Hassell, Density dependence in single-species population, J. Anim. Ecol., 44 (1975), 283–295. doi: 10.2307/3863
![]() |
[23] |
X. Chen, Z. Du, Existence of positive periodic solutions for a neutral delay predator-prey model with Hassell-Varley type functional response and impulse, Theory Dyn. Syst., 17 (2018), 67–80. doi: 10.1007/s12346-017-0223-6
![]() |
[24] | H. Liu, F. Meng, X. He, Existence of positive periodic solutions for a predator-prey system of Holling type Ⅳ function response with mutual interference and impulsive effects, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2015 (2015), 1–12. |
[25] | J. Fu, L. Chen, Qualitative analysis of a class predator-prey model with mutual interference, J. Systems Sci. Math. Sci., 37 (2017), 1166–1178. |
[26] |
M. Hassell, G. Varley, New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control, Nature, 223 (1969), 1133–1137. doi: 10.1038/2231133a0
![]() |
[27] |
R. Arditi, H. Ackakaya, Underestimation of mutual interference of predators, Oeclogia., 83 (1990), 358–361. doi: 10.1007/BF00317560
![]() |
[28] |
W. Satherland, Aggregation and the idea free distribution, J. Anim. Ecol., 52 (1983), 821–828. doi: 10.2307/4456
![]() |
[29] | S. Hsu, T. Hwang, Y. Kuang, Global dynamics of a predator-prey model with Hassell-Varley type functional response, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 10 (2008), 857–871. |
[30] | R. Wu, L. Li, M. DelaSen, Permanence and Global Attractivity of the Discrete Predator-Prey System with Hassell-Varley-Holling Ⅲ Type Functional Response, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2013 (2013), 295–321. |
[31] | M. Zhong, X. Liu, Dynamical analysis of a predator-prey system with Hassell-Varley-Holling function response, J. Math. Phys., 31 (2011), 1295–1310. |
[32] |
M. Fan, Q. Wang, X. Zou, Dynamics of a non-autonomous ratio-dependent predator-prey system, Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A: Math., 133 (2003), 97–118. doi: 10.1017/S0308210500002304
![]() |
[33] | M. Fan, K. Wang, Global existence of positive periodic solution of a Predator-Prey system with Holling Ⅱ function response, Acta Math. Sci. Ser. A Chin. Ed., 21 (2011), 492–497. |
[34] |
S. Zhang, X. Meng, T. Zhang, Dynamics analysis and numerical simulations of a stochastic non-autonomous predator-prey system with impulsive effects, Nonlinear Anal. Hybri., 26 (2017), 19–37. doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2017.04.003
![]() |
[35] | R. Gaines, T. Mawhin, Coincidence Degree and Nonlinear Differential Equations, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977. |