Research article Special Issues

NE transform of pathway fractional integrals involving S-function

  • This paper aims to derive the NE transform of fractional integrals in the pathway that incorporates the S-function in the kernel, considering various parameters. Furthermore, by applying these mathematical operators, we have explored and clarified several key findings and corollaries. Our current study highlights the results of the NE transform, combined with the fractional integral formula of the pathway that includes the S-function within the kernel.

    Citation: Shristi Mishra, Harish Nagar, Naveen Mani, Rahul Shukla. NE transform of pathway fractional integrals involving S-function[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3013-3024. doi: 10.3934/math.2025140

    Related Papers:

    [1] D. L. Suthar, D. Baleanu, S. D. Purohit, F. Uçar . Certain k-fractional calculus operators and image formulas of k-Struve function. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1706-1719. doi: 10.3934/math.2020115
    [2] Georgia Irina Oros, Gheorghe Oros, Daniela Andrada Bardac-Vlada . Certain geometric properties of the fractional integral of the Bessel function of the first kind. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7095-7110. doi: 10.3934/math.2024346
    [3] Wei Liu, Qinghua Zuo, Chen Xu . Finite-time and global Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order neural networks with S-type distributed delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8339-8352. doi: 10.3934/math.2024405
    [4] Muhammad Tariq, Hijaz Ahmad, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Artion Kashuri, Taher A. Nofal, Ching-Hsien Hsu . Inequalities of Simpson-Mercer-type including Atangana-Baleanu fractional operators and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15159-15181. doi: 10.3934/math.2022831
    [5] Serap Özcan, Saad Ihsan Butt, Sanja Tipurić-Spužević, Bandar Bin Mohsin . Construction of new fractional inequalities via generalized $ n $-fractional polynomial $ s $-type convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23924-23944. doi: 10.3934/math.20241163
    [6] Ghulam Farid, Saira Bano Akbar, Shafiq Ur Rehman, Josip Pečarić . Boundedness of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions via (s,m)-convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 966-978. doi: 10.3934/math.2020067
    [7] Shatha S. Alhily, Alina Alb Lupaş . Sandwich theorems involving fractional integrals applied to the $ q $ -analogue of the multiplier transformation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5850-5862. doi: 10.3934/math.2024284
    [8] Ghulam Farid, Maja Andrić, Maryam Saddiqa, Josip Pečarić, Chahn Yong Jung . Refinement and corrigendum of bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7332-7349. doi: 10.3934/math.2020469
    [9] Maliha Rashid, Amna Kalsoom, Maria Sager, Mustafa Inc, Dumitru Baleanu, Ali S. Alshomrani . Mellin transform for fractional integrals with general analytic kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 9443-9462. doi: 10.3934/math.2022524
    [10] Rana Safdar Ali, Saba Batool, Shahid Mubeen, Asad Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Muhammad Samraiz, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Roshan Noor Mohamed . On generalized fractional integral operator associated with generalized Bessel-Maitland function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3027-3046. doi: 10.3934/math.2022167
  • This paper aims to derive the NE transform of fractional integrals in the pathway that incorporates the S-function in the kernel, considering various parameters. Furthermore, by applying these mathematical operators, we have explored and clarified several key findings and corollaries. Our current study highlights the results of the NE transform, combined with the fractional integral formula of the pathway that includes the S-function within the kernel.



    Fractional calculus (F.C) has become a vital tool for modeling and analysis, making substantial contributions across various fields such as material science, biology, mechanics, energy, economics, and control theory. Numerous researchers have explored different aspects of F.C operators, thoroughly investigating their properties, implementation techniques, and complex adaptations [1,2]. These solutions have been fully developed and are practically utilized in multiple areas [3,4]. A deep understanding of classical functions is grounded in fundamental special functions, including the beta, gamma, and hypergeometric functions [5,6]. Importantly, many special functions are defined in terms of the Gamma function [7,8,9]. Over the last few years, the field of classical functions, particularly the generalization of these functions, has experienced rapid growth in mathematical theory [10]. Scientists have recognized the importance of analyzing the properties of these functions as their domains undergo modifications [11,12]. Consequently, numerous researchers and scientists have been consistently engaged in this evolving field, with the aim of exploring and understanding the implications of these changes [13].

    In [14], Daiya and Saxena introduced and examined a novel function known as the S-function. The author investigated its relationships with several other special functions, including the generalized K-function (K.F), M-series (M.S), k-Mittag-Leffler function (k-M.L.F), Mittag-Leffler type functions (M.L), and various other special functions. These distinctive functions have proven to be crucial in the address of challenges in applied sciences, biology, physics, and engineering, showcasing their growing importance and widespread applications. It is defined for ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,lR,R(ϱ)>lR(μ),

    Sϱ,σ,γ,μ,l(m.n)[w1,w2,.....,wi;x1,x2,.....,xj;z]=d=0(w1)d.....(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d.....(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ)zdd!. (1.1)

    k-pochhammer (k-P.S) symbol is defined as

    (γ)n,k=γ(γ+k)......(γ+(n1)k)(nN,γC). (1.2)

    Also, k-gamma is [15],

    Γk(γ)=k(γk)1Γ(γk). (1.3)

    Here, γ belongs to the complex number set, k is a real number, and n is a natural number, as introduced by Diaz and Pariguan [16]. Several significant special cases of the S-function are outlined below:

    (1) If m=n=0, the generalized k-M.L function from Saxena et al. [17,18,19] defines S-function as

    εγ,μl,ϱ,σ=Sϱ,σ,γ,μ,l(0,0)[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;z]=d=0(γ)dμ,lΓk(dϱ+σ)zdd!,R(ϱlμ)>mn. (1.4)

    (2) If l=μ=1, the S-function is the generalized K.F, introduced by Sharma et al. [20,21] is defined as

    Kϱ,σ,γm,n[w1,w2,.....,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;z]=Sϱ,σ,γ,1,1m,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,...,xj;z]=d=0(w1)d(w2)d.....(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d(x2)d,....(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ)zdd!,R(α)>mn. (1.5)

    (3) If ϱ=l=γ=1, then the S-function reduces to the generalized M.S function introduced by Sharma and Jain [22] is defined as

    Mϱ,σm,n[w1,w2,.....,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;z]=Sϱ,σ,γ,1,1m,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,...,xj;z]=d=0(w1)d(w2)d.....(wi)dzd(x1)d(x2)d....(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ),R(ϱ)>mn1. (1.6)

    Nair [23] introduced an expanding pathway fractional integral (PFI) operator, previously defined by Mathai and Haubold [24,25,26]. This operator is defined as follows:

    (Pμ,ξ0+g)(x)=xμ[x/(b(1ξ))]0(1b(1ξ)λx)μ1ξf(λ)dλ. (1.7)

    Given a Lebesgue measurable function g in the interval (c,d), where c and d are real or complex terms, and μ is a complex number with a positive real part, and ξ is a pathway parameter with ξ<1. A model is presented for a real scalar ξ and scalar random variables within the pathway, illustrated through the probability density function in the following fashion:

    g(x)=w|x|1ς[1b(1ξ)|x|ρ]μ/(1ξ), (1.8)

    where x(,);μ>0;ρ>0;[1b(1ξ)|x|ρ]μ/(1ξ);ς>0 and ξ and w denote the pathway parameter and normalizing constant, respectively. Additionally, for ξR we can express the normalizing constant as

    w={12[b(1ξ)]ςρΓ(ςρ+μ1ξ+1),(ξ<1).12ρ[b(1ξ)]ςρΓ(μ1ξ)Γ(ςρ)Γ(ν1α+ςρ),(1ξ1ςρ,δ<1).12[bν]ς/ρΓ(ςρ),(ξ1). (1.9)

    It is defined that if ξ<1, finite range density with [1b(1ξ)|x|ρ]μ/(1ξ) and g(x) mentioned above in Eq (1.8) can be considered as the member of the extended generalized type-1 beta family. In addition to the probability density function specified for g(x) for the variable ξ, several specific instances, such as the triangular density, uniform density, extended type-1 beta density, and various other probability density functions, are precise special cases. For example, if ξ>1 and by setting (1ξ)=(ξ1) in Eq (1.7), then we have

    (Pμ,ξ0+g)(x)=xν[x/(b(1α))]0(1+b(1ξ)λx)μ1+ξf(λ)dλ, (1.10)
    g(x)=w|x|1ς[1+b(1ξ)|x|ρ]μ/(1ξ). (1.11)

    Provided that x(,);ρ>0; and ξ>1 characterize the extended generalized type-2 beta model for real x. The specific cases of d.f in Eq (1.11) include the type-2 beta d.f., the probability density function, and the student's t-density function. For δ1, Eq (1.7), diminishes to the Laplace integral operator. In a similar way, if ξ=0,a=1, and μ takes the place of μ1, then it diminishes to the familiar Riemann Liouvelle fractional operator (Pμ0+g)

    (Pμ1,00+g)(x)=Γ(ν)(Pμ0+g)(x)(R(μ)>1). (1.12)

    The PFI operator, as defined in Eq (1.7), offers access to a range of captivating instances, encompassing F.C. connections to probability density functions and their significance in statistical theory [27,28,29]. Currently, various researchers are investigating PFI formulas associated with diverse special functions [30,31,32]. Recently, Amsalu et al. [33] have examined formulas for PFI involving S-function, as follows:

    Pμ,ξ0+[ηεlSϱ,σ,γ,μ,lm,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,.....,xj;rηϱl]](k)=kμ+εll(l+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)(b(1ξ))εl×Sϱ,σ+(1+μ1ξ)l,γ,μ,lm,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;rkϱl(b(1ξ))ϱl]. (1.13)

    Herer,lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ), and m<n+1,R(μ(1ξ))>1;ξ<1

    Pμ,ξ0+[ηεlSϱ,σ,γ,μ,lm,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,.....,xj;rηϱl]](k)=kμ+εll(lμξ1)Γ(1μξ1)(b(ξ1))εl×Sϱ,σ+(1μξ1)l,γ,μ,lm,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;rkϱl(b(ξ1))ϱl]. (1.14)

    Here r,lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ).

    For many years, integral transforms (I.T) have been instrumental in solving a variety of 'differential' and 'integral' equations. The use of appropriate I.T is crucial in converting differential and integral operators in a given domain into multiplication operators in a different domain, simplifying the problem-solving process. One method for returning the manipulated solution to the intended solution of the original problem within its original domain is to solve the transformed problem in the new domain and then apply the inverse transform. The traditional I.T commonly utilized for addressing differential equations, integral equations, and in analysis and function theory encompasses the Laplace transform applied in engineering and real-life problems and the Hankel's and Weierstrass transforms used in heat and diffusion equations. Furthermore, the natural transform and the Yang transform, both applied across diverse fields in physical science and engineering, are also noteworthy [34]. If we take a function h(t) that is of exponential order 1k, if there exists a positive constant P and Q such that |h(t)|Peqk for all qQ. For any function h(t), we assume that an integral equation exists. NE integral transform is denoted by the operator E(.) and is defined by the integral equation,

    E(s,u)=Nh(t)=120esth(ut)dt. (1.15)

    NE Transform of a function h(t)=xn given as

    N(xn)=unsn+2Γ(n+1). (1.16)

    The mathematical function known as the gamma function, or Γ(z), extends the idea of a factorial to non-integer values. It is defined for complex numbers with a positive real portion. The gamma function formula is as follows [35,36,37]:

    Γ(z)=0tz1etdt. (1.17)

    For complex numbers z with a positive real portion, this integral converges. Numerous uses of the gamma function can be found in physics, engineering, and mathematics. The generalization of the gamma function is the k-gamma function and is defined as:

    Γk(z)=0tkz1etkdt, (1.18)

    k is a positive constant in this case. The k-gamma function adds the parameter k to the exponent yet nevertheless extends the idea of a factorial to non-integer values. This function appears in many contexts in mathematics and science, especially those involving power transformations. Applications for the gamma and k-gamma functions can be found in statistical physics, number theory, complex analysis, and probability theory. They are essential for more broadly describing and resolving problems involving products of factorials or powers.

    This paper broadly consists of 3 sections. Section 1 gives a brief introduction about S-function, NE transform, and PFI formulas, along with PFI, along with S-function and the gamma identities. In Section 2, we have discussed the main results of the paper in which we have derived the NE transform of the PFI that incorporates the S-function in the kernel with various parameters; additionally; by applying a mathematical operator, we have also explored several corollaries. In Section 3, conclusion and future work of the paper are given.

    In this investigation, we have examined the NE integral transform of PFIs that incorporate the S-function in the kernel, as defined in Eqs (1.13) and (1.14).

    The NE transform for PFI formula involving S-function given as follows:

    Theorem 2.1. Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and m<n+1,R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1, then,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+η(εl)1Sϱ,σ,γ,μ,lm,n[w1,w2,...wi;x1,x2,....,xj;rηϱl])(k)]=ukμ+σll(1+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)s3(q(1ξ))σl×Sϱ,σ+(1+μ1ξ)l,γ,μ,l(m,n)[w1,w2,......,wi;x1,x2,.....,wj;2;(us(kq(1ξ))ϱl)]. (2.1)

    Proof. Taking into account the left-hand side of Eq (1.13) and representing it as L1, we can use the result in Eq (2.1) to obtain,

    L1=N[rkμ+σll(1+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)(q(1ξ))σl]×[Sϱ,σ+(1+μ1ξ)l,γ,μ,l(m,n)[w1,w2,......,wi;x1,x2,.....,wj;2;rk(ϱl)(q(1ξ))ϱl]].

    By using the definition of S-function defined in Eq (1.1), we obtain

    L1=N[rkμ+σll(1+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)(q(1ξ))σl]×[d=0(w1)d....(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d....(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1+μ1ξ)(rkϱl(q(1ξ))ϱl)dd!].

    Then by the definition of NE transform defined in Eq (2.1), we obtain

    L1=kμ+(σl)l(1+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)(q(1ξ))σl×d=0(w1)d....(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d....(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1+μ1ξ)(kϱl(q(1ξ))ϱl)dd!×N[rd+1].

    Further solving we obtain

    L1=kμ+(σl)l(1+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)(q(1ξ))σl×d=0(w1)d....(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d....(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1+μ1ξ)(kϱl(q(1ξ))ϱl)dd!ud+1Γ(d+2)sd+3.

    We simplify the above equation by using the properties of the Pochhammer symbol and gamma function,

    L1=ukμ+(σl)l(1+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)s3(q(1ξ))σl×d=0(w1)d....(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(2)d(x1)d....(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1+μ1ξ)(ukϱl(q(1ξ))ϱl)dd!.

    Then by using some definition of S-function, we obtain the result.

    Corollary 2.2. Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+η(σl)1Eϱ,σ,γμ,l[rηϱl])(k)]=ukμ+(σl)l(1+μ1ξ)Γ(μ1ξ+1)s3(q(1ξ))σl×Eϱ,σ+(1+μ1ξ)l,γμ,l(2;us(kq(1ξ))ϱl). (2.2)

    Proof. If we put m=n=0 in Eq (1.13), we obtain the result for the generalized k-M.L function as given in [33]. The result obtained in Eq (2.2), is NE integral transform of the PFI involving generalized k-M.L function.

    Corollary 2.3. Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+ησ1Kϱ,σ,γm,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,.....,xj;rηϱ])(k)]=ukμ+σΓ(μ1ξ+1)s3(q(1ξ))σ×Kϱ,σ+(1+μ1ξ),γm,n[w1,w2,...,wi;x1,x2,...,xj;2;(us(kq(1ξ))ϱ)]. (2.3)

    Proof. If we put l=μ=1 in Eq (1.13), we obtain the result for generalized K.F as given in [33]. The result obtained in Eq (2.3), is the NE integral transform of the PFI that is involved in generalized K.F.

    Corollary 2.4. Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+ησ1Mϱ,σm,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,.....,xj;rηϱ])(k)]=ukμ+σΓ(μ1ξ+1)s3(q(1ξ))σ×Mϱ,σ+(1+μ1ξ)m,n[w1,w2,...,wi;x1,x2,...,xj;2;(us(kq(1ξ))ϱ)]. (2.4)

    Proof. If we put l=μ=γ=1 in Eq (1.13), we obtain the result for generalized M.S as given in [33]. The result obtained in Eq (2.4) is the NE integral transform of the PFI involving generalized M.S.

    Theorem 2.5. The NE for the PFI formula involving the S-function is given as follows: Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and m<n+1,R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1 then,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+η(εl)1Sϱ,σ,γ,μ,lm,n[w1,w2,...wi;x1,x2,....,xj;rηϱl])(k)]=ukμ+σll(1μξ1)Γ(1μξ1)s3(q(ξ1))σl×Sϱ,σ+(1μξ1)l,γ,μ,l(m,n)[w1,w2,......,wi;x1,x2,.....,wj;2;(us(kq(ξ1))ϱl)]. (2.5)

    Proof. Taking into account the left-hand side of the Eq (2.5) and representing it as L2, we can use the result defined in Eq (1.14) to obtain,

    L2=N[rkμ+σll(1μξ1)Γ(1μξ1)(q(ξ1))σl]×Sϱ,σ+(1μξ1)l,γ,μ,l(m,n)[w1,w2,....wi;x1,x2,...xj;rkϱl(q(ξ1))ϱl].

    By using the definition of S-function defined in Eq (1.1), we obtain

    L2=N[rkμ+σll(1μξ1)Γ(1μξ1)(q(ξ1))σl]×d=0(w1)d,....,(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d,.....,(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1μξ1)(rkϱl(q(ξ1))ϱl)dd!.

    Then by the definition of NE transform defined in Eq (1.16), we obtain

    L2=kμ+σll(1μξ1)Γ(1μξ1)(q(ξ1))σl×d=0(w1)d,....,(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d,.....,(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1μξ1)(kϱl(q(ξ1))ϱl)dd!N(rd+1).

    Further solving we obtain

    L2=kμ+σll(1μξ1)Γ(1μξ1)(q(ξ1))σl×d=0(w1)d,....,(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(x1)d,.....,(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1μξ1)(kϱl(q(ξ1))ϱl)dd!ud+1Γ(d+2)sd+3.

    From the properties of the Pochhamer symbol and gamma function and simplifying the above equation, we obtain

    L2=ukμ+σll(1μξ1)Γ(1μξ1)s3(q(ξ1))σl×d=0(w1)d,....,(wi)d(γ)dμ,l(2)d(x1)d,.....,(xj)dΓk(dϱ+σ+1μξ1)(ukϱl(q(ξ1))ϱl)dd!.

    Then by using some results of the PFI operator on the S-function as mentioned in Eqs (1.1) and (1.14), we get the desired result.

    Corollary 2.6. Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and m<n+1,R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1 then,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+η(σl)1Eϱ,σ,γμ,l[rη(ϱl)])(k)]=ukμ+σll(1μξ1)Γ(1μξ1)s3(q(ξ1))(σl)×Eϱ,σ+(1μξ1)l,γμ,l[2;(us(kq(ξ1))ϱl)]. (2.6)

    Proof. If we put m=n=0 in Eq (1.14), we obtain the result for the generalized k-M.L function as given in [33]. The result obtained in Eq (2.6) is the NE integral transform of the PFI involving the generalized k-M.L function.

    Corollary 2.7. Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and m<n+1,R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1 then,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+ησ1Kϱ,σ,γm,n[w1,w2,...,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;rησ])(k)]=ukμ+σΓ(1μξ1)s3(q(ξ1))σ×Kϱ,σ+(1μξ1),γm,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;2;(us(kq(ξ1))σ)]. (2.7)

    Proof. If we put l=μ=1 in Eq (1.14), we obtain the result for generalized K.F as given in [33]. The result obtained in Eq (2.7) is the NE integral transform of the PFI involving generalized K.F.

    Corollary 2.8. Let lR,ϱ,σ,γ,μC,R(ϱ)>0,R(μ)>0,R(ϱ)>lR(μ) and m<n+1,R(μ1ξ)>1;ξ<1,|r|<1 then,

    N[r.(Pμ,ξ0+ησ1Mϱ,σm,n[w1,w2,...,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;rησ])(k)]=ukμ+σΓ(1μξ1)s3(q(ξ1))σ×Mϱ,σ+(1μξ1)m,n[w1,w2,....,wi;x1,x2,....,xj;2;(us(kq(ξ1))σ)]. (2.8)

    Proof. If we put l=μ=γ=1 in Eq (1.14), we obtain the result for generalized M.S as given in [33]. The result obtained in Eq (2.8) is the NE integral transform of the PFI involving generalized M.S.

    Our main research objective was to apply the NE transform to a PFI formula containing an S-function in the kernel. By utilizing these mathematical operators, we have investigated and elucidated various important discoveries and corollaries. Our current analysis emphasizes that the outcomes obtained through the NE transform, in conjunction with the PFI formula incorporating the S-function in the kernel, are highly significant, broadly applicable, and well-suited for integral transform techniques. Consequently, the results from our study are expected to have potential applications in diverse fields such as geophysics, earth sciences, engineering, and chemical physics.

    S. Mishra: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation, original draft writing; H. Nagar: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, visualization; N. Mani: review and editing, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, visualization; R. Shukla: formal analysis, investigation, project administration, resources, supervision, validation. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    The authors declare that they did not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors express their gratitude to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions, which have significantly enhanced the quality of this paper. This work was supported by the Directorate of Research and Innovation, Walter Sisulu University.

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.



    [1] P. Agarwal, On a new unified integral involving hypergeometric functions, Adv. Comput. Math. Appl., 2 (2012), 239–242.
    [2] D. Baleanu, P. Agarwal, On generalized fractional integral operators and the generalized gauss hypergeometric functions, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 630840. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/630840 doi: 10.1155/2014/630840
    [3] J. Choi, P. Agarwal, Certain class of generating functions for the incomplete hypergeometric functions, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 714560. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/714560 doi: 10.1155/2014/714560
    [4] M. J. Luo, G. V. Milovanovic, P. Agarwal, Some results on the extended beta and extended hypergeometric functions, Appl. Math. Comput., 248 (2014), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.110 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.110
    [5] P. Agarwal, S. Jain, I. Kiymaz, M. Chand, A. O. Skq, Certain sequence of functions involving generalized hypergeometric functions, Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes, 3 (2015), 45–53.
    [6] P. Agarwal, J. Choi, S. Jain, Extended hypergeometric functions of two and three variables, Commun. Korean Math. Soc., 30 (2015), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.4134/CKMS.2015.30.4.403 doi: 10.4134/CKMS.2015.30.4.403
    [7] M. A. Chaudhry, S. M. Zubair, Generalized incomplete gamma functions with applications, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 55 (1994), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(94)90187-2 doi: 10.1016/0377-0427(94)90187-2
    [8] R. Goyal, S. Momani, P. Agarwal, M. T. Rassias, An extension of beta function by using wiman's function, Axioms, 10 (2021), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10030187 doi: 10.3390/axioms10030187
    [9] P. Agarwal, D. Baleanu, Y. Chen, S. Momani, J. T. Machado, Fractional calculus, ICFDA 2018, Amman, Jordan, July 16–18, Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0430-3
    [10] F. Wang, I. Ahmad, H. Ahmad, M. D. Alsulami, K. S. Alimgeer, C. Cesarano, et al., Meeshless method based on RBFs for solvin three dimensional multi-term time fractional PDEs arising in engineering phenomenons, J. King Saud Univ.-Sci., 33 (2021), 101604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101604 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101604
    [11] H. Ahmed, M. Tariq, S. K. Sahu, J. Baili, C. Caesarano, New estimations on Hermite-Hadmard type integral inequalities for special functions, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040144 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040144
    [12] V. S. Kiryakova, Generalized fractional calculus and applications, CRC press, 1993.
    [13] K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Wiley, 1993.
    [14] J. Daiya, R. K. Saxena, Integral transforms of the S-functions, Le Mat., 70 (2015), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.4418/2015.70.2.10 doi: 10.4418/2015.70.2.10
    [15] R. Askey, Orthogonal polynomials and special functions, SIAM, 1975.
    [16] R. Diaz, E. Pariguan, On hypergeometric functions and Pochhammer k-symbol, Divulg. Mat., 15 (2007), 179–192.
    [17] R. K. Saxena, J. Daiya, A. Singh, Integral transforms of the k-generalized Mittag-Leffler function Eγ,τk,α,β(z), Le Mat., 69 (2014), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.4418/2014.69.2.2 doi: 10.4418/2014.69.2.2
    [18] H. Amsalu, D. Suthar, Generalized fractional integral operators involving Mittag-Leffler function, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2018 (2018), 7034124. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7034124 doi: 10.1155/2018/7034124
    [19] S. D. Purohit, S. L. Kalla, D. L. Suthar, Fractional integral operators and the multiindex Mittag-Leffler functions, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 118 (2000), 241–259.
    [20] K. Sharma, Application of fractional calculus operators to related areas, Gen. Math. Notes, 7 (2011), 33–40.
    [21] D. L. Suthar, H. Habenom, Marichev-saigo integral operators involving the product of k-function and multivariable polynomials, Commun. Numer. Anal., 2017 (2017), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.5899/2017/cna-00314 doi: 10.5899/2017/cna-00314
    [22] M. Sharma, R. Jain, A note on a generalized M-series as a special function of fractional calculus, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 12 (2009), 449–452.
    [23] S. S. Nair, Pathway fractional integration operator, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 12 (2009), 237–252.
    [24] A. M. Mathai, A pathway to matrix-variate gamma and normal densities, Linear Algebra Appl., 396 (2005), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2004.09.022 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2004.09.022
    [25] A. M. Mathai, H. J. Haubold, Pathway model, superstatistics, Tsallis statistics, and a generalized measure of entropy, Phys. A, 375 (2007), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.09.002
    [26] A. M. Mathai, H. J. Haubold, On generalized distributions and pathways, Phys. Lett., 372 (2008), 2109–2113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.084 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.084
    [27] P. Agarwal, J. Choi, Certain fractional integral inequalities associated with pathway fractional integral operators, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 53 (2016), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.2016.53.1.181 doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2016.53.1.181
    [28] P. Agarwal, S. D. Purohit, The unified pathway fractional integral formulae, J. Fract. Calc. Appl., 4 (2013), 105–112.
    [29] D. Baleanu, P. Agarwal, A composition formula of the pathway integral transform operator, Note Mat., 34 (2015), 145–156.
    [30] J. Choi, P. Agarwal, Certain inequalities involving pathway fractional integral operators, Kyungpook Math. J., 56 (2016), 1161–1168. https://doi.org/10.5666/KMJ.2016.56.4.1161 doi: 10.5666/KMJ.2016.56.4.1161
    [31] S. Jain, P. Agarwal, A. Kilicman, Pathway fractional integral operator associated with 3m-parametric Mittag-Leffler functions, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 4 (2018), 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-018-0549-z doi: 10.1007/s40819-018-0549-z
    [32] D. Kumar, R. K. Saxena, J. Daiya, Pathway fractional integral operators of generalized k-wright function and k4-function, Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat., 35 (2017), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5269/bspm.v35i2.29180 doi: 10.5269/bspm.v35i2.29180
    [33] H. Amsalu, B. Shimelis, D. L. Suthar, Pathway fractional integral formulas involving s-function in the kernel, Math. Probl. Eng., 2020 (2020), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4236823 doi: 10.1155/2020/4236823
    [34] E. M. Xhaferraj, The new integral transform: "NE transform" and its applications, Eur. J. Formal Sci. Eng., 6 (2023), 22–34.
    [35] P. Sebah, X. Gourdon, Introduction to the gamma function, Amer. J. Sci. Res., 2002, 2–18.
    [36] E. Artin, The gamma function, Courier Dover Publications, 2015.
    [37] N. Batir, Inequalities for the gamma function, Arch. Math., 91 (2008), 554–563.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(275) PDF downloads(29) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog