The objective of this study was to provide an overview of Decision Support Systems (DSS) applied in healthcare used for diagnosis, monitoring, prediction and recommendation in medicine.
We conducted a systematic review using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines of articles published until September 2022 from PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and web of science databases. We used KH coder to analyze included research. Then we categorized decision support systems based on their types and medical applications.
The search strategy provided a total of 1605 articles in the studied period. Of these, 231 articles were included in this qualitative review. This research was classified into 4 categories based on the DSS type used in healthcare: Alert Systems, Monitoring Systems, Recommendation Systems and Prediction Systems. Under each category, domain applications were specified according to the disease the system was applied to.
In this systematic review, we collected CDSS studies that use ML techniques to provide insights into different CDSS types. We highlighted the importance of ML to support physicians in clinical decision-making and improving healthcare according to their purposes.
Citation: Houssem Ben Khalfallah, Mariem Jelassi, Jacques Demongeot, Narjès Bellamine Ben Saoud. Decision support systems in healthcare: systematic review, meta-analysis and prediction, with example of COVID-19[J]. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(1): 27-52. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023004
[1] | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Artion Kashuri, Hüseyin Budak . Generalizations of fractional Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer like inequalities for convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9397-9421. doi: 10.3934/math.2021546 |
[2] | Saad Ihsan Butt, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Umar, Adnan Aslam, Wei Gao . Hermite-Jensen-Mercer type inequalities via Ψ-Riemann-Liouville k-fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5193-5220. doi: 10.3934/math.2020334 |
[3] | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Uzair Awan, Muhammad Zakria Javed, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor . Some new generalized κ–fractional Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer type integral inequalities and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3203-3220. doi: 10.3934/math.2022177 |
[4] | Jia-Bao Liu, Saad Ihsan Butt, Jamshed Nasir, Adnan Aslam, Asfand Fahad, Jarunee Soontharanon . Jensen-Mercer variant of Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities via Atangana-Baleanu fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2123-2141. doi: 10.3934/math.2022121 |
[5] | Yanping Yang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Waqas Nazeer, Ahsan Fareed Shah . New Hermite-Hadamard inequalities in fuzzy-interval fractional calculus via exponentially convex fuzzy interval-valued function. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12260-12278. doi: 10.3934/math.2021710 |
[6] | Yamin Sayyari, Mana Donganont, Mehdi Dehghanian, Morteza Afshar Jahanshahi . Strongly convex functions and extensions of related inequalities with applications to entropy. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 10997-11006. doi: 10.3934/math.2024538 |
[7] | Jamshed Nasir, Saber Mansour, Shahid Qaisar, Hassen Aydi . Some variants on Mercer's Hermite-Hadamard like inclusions of interval-valued functions for strong Kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10001-10020. doi: 10.3934/math.2023506 |
[8] | Tahir Ullah Khan, Muhammad Adil Khan . Hermite-Hadamard inequality for new generalized conformable fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 23-38. doi: 10.3934/math.2021002 |
[9] | Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Iqra Nayab, Gauhar Rahman, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dumitru Baleanu . Some generalized fractional integral inequalities with nonsingular function as a kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3352-3377. doi: 10.3934/math.2021201 |
[10] | Paul Bosch, Héctor J. Carmenate, José M. Rodríguez, José M. Sigarreta . Generalized inequalities involving fractional operators of the Riemann-Liouville type. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 1470-1485. doi: 10.3934/math.2022087 |
The objective of this study was to provide an overview of Decision Support Systems (DSS) applied in healthcare used for diagnosis, monitoring, prediction and recommendation in medicine.
We conducted a systematic review using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines of articles published until September 2022 from PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and web of science databases. We used KH coder to analyze included research. Then we categorized decision support systems based on their types and medical applications.
The search strategy provided a total of 1605 articles in the studied period. Of these, 231 articles were included in this qualitative review. This research was classified into 4 categories based on the DSS type used in healthcare: Alert Systems, Monitoring Systems, Recommendation Systems and Prediction Systems. Under each category, domain applications were specified according to the disease the system was applied to.
In this systematic review, we collected CDSS studies that use ML techniques to provide insights into different CDSS types. We highlighted the importance of ML to support physicians in clinical decision-making and improving healthcare according to their purposes.
Decision-making support systems;
decision support systems;
Artificial Intelligence;
Intelligent decision support systems;
electronic health records;
machine learning;
artificial neural network;
logistic regression;
support vector machines;
naive Bayes;
k-nearest neighbors;
linear discriminant analysis;
decision trees
For a convex function σ:I⊆R→R on I with ν1,ν2∈I and ν1<ν2, the Hermite-Hadamard inequality is defined by [1]:
σ(ν1+ν22)≤1ν2−ν1∫ν2ν1σ(η)dη≤σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)2. | (1.1) |
The Hermite-Hadamard integral inequality (1.1) is one of the most famous and commonly used inequalities. The recently published papers [2,3,4] are focused on extending and generalizing the convexity and Hermite-Hadamard inequality.
The situation of the fractional calculus (integrals and derivatives) has won vast popularity and significance throughout the previous five decades or so, due generally to its demonstrated applications in numerous seemingly numerous and great fields of science and engineering [5,6,7].
Now, we recall the definitions of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals.
Definition 1.1 ([5,6,7]). Let σ∈L1[ν1,ν2]. The Riemann-Liouville integrals Jϑν1+σ and Jϑν2−σ of order ϑ>0 with ν1≥0 are defined by
Jϑν1+σ(x)=1Γ(ϑ)∫xν1(x−η)ϑ−1σ(η)dη, ν1<x | (1.2) |
and
Jϑν2−σ(x)=1Γ(ϑ)∫ν2x(η−x)ϑ−1σ(η)dη, x<ν2, | (1.3) |
respectively. Here Γ(ϑ) is the well-known Gamma function and J0ν1+σ(x)=J0ν2−σ(x)=σ(x).
With a huge application of fractional integration and Hermite-Hadamard inequality, many researchers in the field of fractional calculus extended their research to the Hermite-Hadamard inequality, including fractional integration rather than ordinary integration; for example see [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
In this paper, we consider the integral inequality of Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer type that relies on the Hermite-Hadamard and Jensen-Mercer inequalities. For this purpose, we recall the Jensen-Mercer inequality: Let 0<x1≤x2≤⋯≤xn and μ=(μ1,μ2,…,μn) nonnegative weights such that ∑ni=1μi=1. Then, the Jensen inequality [22,23] is as follows, for a convex function σ on the interval [ν1,ν2], we have
σ(n∑i=1μixi)≤n∑i=1μiσ(xi), | (1.4) |
where for all xi∈[ν1,ν2] and μi∈[0,1], (i=¯1,n).
Theorem 1.1 ([2,23]). If σ is convex function on [ν1,ν2], then
σ(ν1+ν2−n∑i=1μixi)≤σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)−n∑i=1μiσ(xi), | (1.5) |
for each xi∈[ν1,ν2] and μi∈[0,1], (i=¯1,n) with ∑ni=1μi=1. For some results related with Jensen-Mercer inequality, see [24,25,26].
In view of above indices, we establish new integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer type for convex functions via the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals in the current project. Particularly, we see that our results can cover the previous researches.
Theorem 2.1. For a convex function σ:[ν1,ν2]⊆R→R with x,y∈[ν1,ν2], we have:
σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)≤2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]≤σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)−σ(x)+σ(y)2. | (2.1) |
Proof. By using the convexity of σ, we have
σ(ν1+ν2−u+v2)≤12[σ(ν1+ν2−u)+σ(ν1+ν2−v)], | (2.2) |
and above with u=1−η2x+1+η2y, v=1+η2x+1−η2y, where x,y∈[ν1,ν2] and η∈[0,1], leads to
σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)≤12[σ(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))+σ(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))]. | (2.3) |
Multiplying both sides of (2.3) by ηϑ−1 and then integrating with respect to η over [0,1], we get
1ϑσ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)≤12[∫10ηϑ−1σ(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))dη+∫10ηϑ−1σ(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))dη]=12[2ϑ(y−x)ϑ∫ν1+ν2−x+y2ν1+ν2−y((ν1+ν2−x+y2)−w)ϑ−1σ(w)dw+2ϑ(y−x)ϑ∫ν1+ν2−xν1+ν2−x+y2(w−(ν1+ν2−x+y2))ϑ−1σ(w)dw]=2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)], |
and thus the proof of first inequality in (2.1) is completed.
On the other hand, we have by using the Jensen-Mercer inequality:
σ(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))≤σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)−(1−η2σ(x)+1+η2σ(y)) | (2.4) |
σ(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))≤σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)−(1+η2σ(x)+1−η2σ(y)). | (2.5) |
Adding inequalities (2.4) and (2.5) to get
σ(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))+σ(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))≤2[σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)]−[σ(x)+σ(y)]. | (2.6) |
Multiplying both sides of (2.6) by ηϑ−1 and then integrating with respect to η over [0,1] to obtain
∫10ηϑ−1σ(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))dη+∫10ηϑ−1σ(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))dη≤2ϑ[σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)]−1ϑ[σ(x)+σ(y)]. |
By making use of change of variables and then multiplying by ϑ2, we get the second inequality in (2.1).
Remark 2.1. If we choose ϑ=1, x=ν1 and y=ν2 in Theorem 2.1, then the inequality (2.1) reduces to (1.1).
Corollary 2.1. Theorem 2.1 with
● ϑ=1 becomes [24, Theorem 2.1].
● x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
σ(ν1+ν22)≤2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(ν2−ν1)ϑ[Jϑν1+σ(ν1+ν22)+Jϑν2−σ(ν1+ν22)]≤σ(ν1)+σ(ν2)2, |
which is obtained by Mohammed and Brevik in [10].
The following Lemma linked with the left inequality of (2.1) is useful to obtain our next results.
Lemma 2.1. Let σ:[ν1,ν2]⊆R→R be a differentiable function on (ν1,ν2) and σ′∈L[ν1,ν2] with ν1≤ν2 and x,y∈[ν1,ν2]. Then, we have:
2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)=(y−x)4∫10ηϑ[σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))−σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))]dη. | (2.7) |
Proof. From right hand side of (2.7), we set
ϖ1−ϖ2:=∫10ηϑ[σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))−σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))]dη=∫10ηϑσ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))dη−∫10ηϑσ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))dη. | (2.8) |
By integrating by parts with w=ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y), we can deduce:
ϖ1=−2(y−x)σ(ν1+ν2−y)+2ϑ(y−x)∫10ηϑ−1σ(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))dη=−2(y−x)σ(ν1+ν2−y)+2ϑ+1ϑ(y−x)ϑ+1∫ν1+ν2−x+y2ν1+ν2−yσ((ν1+ν2−x+y2)−w)ϑ−1σ(w)dw=−2(y−x)σ(ν1+ν2−y)+2ϑ+1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ+1Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2). |
Similarly, we can deduce:
ϖ2=2y−xσ(ν1+ν2−x)−2ϑ+1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ+1Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2). |
By substituting ϖ1 and ϖ2 in (2.8) and then multiplying by (y−x)4, we obtain required identity (2.7).
Corollary 2.2. Lemma 2.1 with
● ϑ=1 becomes:
1y−x∫ν1+ν2−xν1+ν2−yσ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)=(y−x)4∫10η[σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))−σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))]dη. |
● ϑ=1, x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
1ν2−ν1∫ν2ν1σ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν22)=(ν2−ν1)4∫10η[σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2ν1+1+η2ν2))−σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2ν1+1−η2ν2))]dη. |
● x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(ν2−ν1)ϑ[Jϑν1+σ(ν1+ν22)+Jϑν2−σ(ν1+ν22)]−σ(ν1+ν22)=(ν2−ν1)4∫10ηϑ[σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2ν1+1+η2ν2))−σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2ν1+1−η2ν2))]dη. |
Theorem 2.2. Let σ:[ν1,ν2]⊆R→R be a differentiable function on (ν1,ν2) and |σ′| is convex on [ν1,ν2] with ν1≤ν2 and x,y∈[ν1,ν2]. Then, we have:
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)2(1+ϑ)[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|−|σ′(x)|+|σ′(y)|2]. | (2.9) |
Proof. By taking modulus of identity (2.7), we get
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4[∫10ηϑ|σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))|dη+∫10ηϑ|σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))|dη]. |
Then, by applying the convexity of |σ′| and the Jensen-Mercer inequality on above inequality, we get
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4[∫10ηϑ[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|−(1+η2|σ′(x)|+1−η2)|σ′(y)|]dη+∫10ηϑ[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|−(1−η2|σ′(x)|+1+η2)|σ′(y)|]dη]=(y−x)2(1+ϑ)[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|−|σ′(x)|+|σ′(y)|2], |
which completes the proof of Theorem 2.2.
Corollary 2.3. Theorem 2.2 with
● ϑ=1 becomes:
|1y−x∫ν1+ν2−xν1+ν2−yσ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|−|σ′(x)|+|σ′(y)|2]. |
● ϑ=1, x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes [27, Theorem 2.2].
● x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
|1ν2−ν1∫ν2ν1σ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν22)|≤(ν2−ν1)4[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|2]. |
Theorem 2.3. Let σ:[ν1,ν2]⊆R→R be a differentiable function on (ν1,ν2) and |σ′|q,q>1 is convex on [ν1,ν2] with ν1≤ν2 and x,y∈[ν1,ν2]. Then, we have:
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4p√ϑp+1[(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(|σ′(x)|q+3|σ′(y)|q4))1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(3|σ′(x)|q+|σ′(y)|q4))1q], | (2.10) |
where 1p+1q=1.
Proof. By taking modulus of identity (2.7) and using Hölder's inequality, we get
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4(∫10ηϑp)1p{(∫10|σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))|qdη)1q+(∫10|σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))|qdη)1q}. |
Then, by applying the Jensen-Mercer inequality with the convexity of |σ′|q, we can deduce
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4(∫10ηϑp)1p{(∫10|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(1−η2|σ′(x)|q+1+η2|σ′(y)|q))1q+(∫10|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(1+η2|σ′(x)|q+1−η2|σ′(y)|q))1q}=(y−x)4p√ϑp+1[(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(|σ′(x)|q+3|σ′(y)|q4))1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(3|σ′(x)|q+|σ′(y)|q4))1q], |
which completes the proof of Theorem 2.3.
Corollary 2.4. Theorem 2.3 with
● ϑ=1 becomes:
|1y−x∫ν1+ν2−xν1+ν2−yσ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4p√p+1[(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(|σ′(x)|q+3|σ′(y)|q4))1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(3|σ′(x)|q+|σ′(y)|q4))1q]. |
● ϑ=1, x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
|1ν2−ν1∫ν2ν1σ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν22)|≤(ν2−ν1)22p(1p+1)1p[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|]. |
● x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(ν2−ν1)ϑ[Jϑν1+σ(ν1+ν22)+Jϑν2−σ(ν1+ν22)]−σ(ν1+ν22)|≤2ϑ−1−2qν2−ν1(1p+1)1p[|σ′(ν1)|+|σ′(ν2)|]. |
Theorem 2.4. Let σ:[ν1,ν2]⊆R→R be a differentiable function on (ν1,ν2) and |σ′|q,q≥1 is convex on [ν1,ν2] with ν1≤ν2 and x,y∈[ν1,ν2]. Then, we have:
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4(ϑ+1)[(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(|σ′(x)|q+(2ϑ+3)|σ′(y)|q2(ϑ+2)))1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−((2ϑ+3)|σ′(x)|q+|σ′(y)|q2(ϑ+2)))1q]. | (2.11) |
Proof. By taking modulus of identity (2.7) with the well-known power mean inequality, we can deduce
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4(∫10ηϑ)1−1q{(∫10ηϑ|σ′(ν1+ν2−(1−η2x+1+η2y))|qdη)1q+(∫10ηϑ|σ′(ν1+ν2−(1+η2x+1−η2y))|qdη)1q}. |
By applying the Jensen-Mercer inequality with the convexity of |σ′|q, we can deduce
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(y−x)ϑ[Jϑ(ν1+ν2−y)+σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)+Jϑ(ν1+ν2−x)−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)]−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)4(∫10ηϑ)1−1q{(∫10ηϑ[|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(1−η2|σ′(x)|q+1+η2|σ′(y)|q)])1q+(∫10ηϑ[|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(1+η2|σ′(x)|q+1−η2|σ′(y)|q)])1q}=(y−x)4(ϑ+1)[(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(|σ′(x)|q+(2ϑ+3)|σ′(y)|q2(ϑ+2)))1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−((2ϑ+3)|σ′(x)|q+|σ′(y)|q2(ϑ+2)))1q], |
which completes the proof of Theorem 2.4.
Corollary 5. Theorem 2.4 with
● q=1 becomes Theorem 2.2.
● ϑ=1 becomes:
|1y−x∫ν1+ν2−xν1+ν2−yσ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν2−x+y2)|≤(y−x)8[(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(|σ′(x)|q+5|σ′(y)|q6))1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q−(5|σ′(x)|q+|σ′(y)|q6))1q]. |
● ϑ=1, x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
|1ν2−ν1∫ν2ν1σ(w)dw−σ(ν1+ν22)|≤(y−x)8[(5|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q6)1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+5|σ′(ν2)|q6)1q]. |
● x=ν1 and y=ν2 becomes:
|2ϑ−1Γ(ϑ+1)(ν2−ν1)ϑ[Jϑν1+σ(ν1+ν22)+Jϑν2−σ(ν1+ν22)]−σ(ν1+ν22)|≤(ν2−ν1)4(ϑ+1)[((2ϑ+3)|σ′(ν1)|q+|σ′(ν2)|q2(ϑ+2))1q+(|σ′(ν1)|q+(2ϑ+3)|σ′(ν2)|q2(ϑ+2))1q]. |
Here, we consider the following special means:
● The arithmetic mean:
A(ν1,ν2)=ν1+ν22,ν1,ν2≥0. |
● The harmonic mean:
H(ν1,ν2)=2ν1ν2ν1+ν2,ν1,ν2>0. |
● The logarithmic mean:
L(ν1,ν2)={ν2−ν1lnν2−lnν1,ifν1≠ν2,ν1,ifν1=ν2,ν1,ν2>0. |
● The generalized logarithmic mean:
Ln(ν1,ν2)={[νn+12−νn+11(n+1)(ν2−ν1)]1n,ifν1≠ν2ν1,ifν1=ν2,ν1,ν2>0;n∈Z∖{−1,0}. |
Proposition 3.1. Let 0<ν1<ν2 and n∈N, n≥2. Then, for all x,y∈[ν1,ν2], we have:
|Lnn(ν1+ν2−y,ν1+ν2−x)−(2A(ν1,ν2)−A(x,y))n|≤n(y−x)4[2A(νn−11,νn−12)−A(xn−1,yn−1)]. | (3.1) |
Proof. By applying Corollary 2.3 (first item) for the convex function σ(x)=xn,x>0, one can obtain the result directly.
Proposition 3.2. Let 0<ν1<ν2. Then, for all x,y∈[ν1,ν2], we have:
|L−1(ν1+ν2−y,ν1+ν2−x)−(2A(ν1,ν2)−A(x,y))−1|≤(y−x)4[2H−1(ν21,ν22)−H−1(x2,y2)]. | (3.2) |
Proof. By applying Corollary 2.3 (first item) for the convex function σ(x)=1x,x>0, one can obtain the result directly.
Proposition 3.3. Let 0<ν1<ν2 and n∈N, n≥2. Then, we have:
|Lnn(ν1,ν2)−An(ν1,ν2)|≤n(ν2−ν1)4[A(νn−11,νn−12)], | (3.3) |
and
|L−1(ν1,ν2)−A−1(ν1,ν2)|≤(ν2−ν1)4H−1(ν21,ν22). | (3.4) |
Proof. By setting x=ν1 and y=ν2 in results of Proposition 3.1 and Proposition 3.2, one can obtain the Proposition 3.3.
Proposition 3.4. Let 0<ν1<ν2 and n∈N, n≥2. Then, for q>1,1p+1q=1 and for all x,y∈[ν1,ν2], we have:
|Lnn(ν1+ν2−y,ν1+ν2−x)−(2A(ν1,ν2)−A(x,y))n|≤n(y−x)4p√p+1{[2A(νq(n−1)1,νq(n−1)2)−12A(xq(n−1),3yq(n−1))]1q+[2A(νq(n−1)1,νq(n−1)2)−12A(3xq(n−1),yq(n−1))]1q}. | (3.5) |
Proof. By applying Corollary 2.4 (first item) for convex function σ(x)=xn,x>0, one can obtain the result directly.
Proposition 3.5. Let 0<ν1<ν2. Then, for q>1,1p+1q=1 and for all x,y∈[ν1,ν2], we have:
|L−1(ν1+ν2−y,ν1+ν2−x)−(2A(ν1,ν2)−A(x,y))−1|≤q√2(y−x)4p√p+1{[H−1(ν2q1,ν2q2)−34H−1(x2q,3y2q)]1q+[H−1(ν2q1,ν2q2)−34H−1(3x2q,y2q)]1q}. | (3.6) |
Proof. By applying Corollary 2.4 (first item) for the convex function σ(x)=1x,x>0, one can obtain the result directly.
Proposition 3.6. Let 0<ν1<ν2 and n∈N, n≥2. Then, for q>1 and 1p+1q=1, we have:
|Lnn(ν1,ν2)−An(ν1,ν2)|≤n(ν2−ν1)4p√p+1{[2A(νq(n−1)1,νq(n−1)2)−12A(νq(n−1)1,3νq(n−1)2)]1q+[2A(νq(n−1)1,νq(n−1)2)−12A(3νq(n−1)1,νq(n−1)2)]1q}, | (3.7) |
and
|L−1(ν1,ν2)−A−1(ν1,ν2)|≤q√2(ν2−ν1)4p√p+1{[H−1(ν2q1,ν2q2)−34H−1(ν2q1,3ν2q2)]1q+[H−1(ν2q1,ν2q2)−34H−1(3ν2q1,ν2q2)]1q}. | (3.8) |
Proof. By setting x=ν1 and y=ν2 in results of Proposition 3.4 and Proposition 3.5, one can obtain the Proposition 3.6.
As we emphasized in the introduction, integral inequality is the most important field of mathematical analysis and fractional calculus. By using the well-known Jensen-Mercer and power mean inequalities, we have proved new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer type involving Riemann-Liouville fractional operators. In the last section, we have considered some propositions in the context of special functions; these confirm the efficiency of our results.
We would like to express our special thanks to the editor and referees. Also, the first author would like to thank Prince Sultan University for funding this work through research group Nonlinear Analysis Methods in Applied Mathematics (NAMAM) group number RG-DES-2017-01-17.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | Gupta JN, Forgionne GA, Mora M (2007) Intelligent decision-making support systems: foundations, applications and challenges. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. |
[2] | Merkert J, Mueller M, Hubl M A Survey of the Application of Machine Learning in Decision Support Systems (2015). |
[3] |
Proudlove NC, Vadera S, Kobbacy KAH (1998) Intelligent management systems in operations: A review. J Oper Res Soc 49: 682-699. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600519 ![]() |
[4] |
Gottinger HW, Weimann P (1992) Intelligent decision support systems. Decis Support Syst 8: 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(92)90053-R ![]() |
[5] |
Elam JJ, Konsynski B (1987) Using artificial intelligence techniques to enhance the capabilities of model management systems. Decision Sci 18: 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1987.tb01537.x ![]() |
[6] |
Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, et al. (2005) Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330: 765. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F ![]() |
[7] |
Islam MdM, Haque MdR, Iqbal H, et al. (2020) Breast cancer prediction: A comparative study using machine learning techniques. SN Computer Science 1: 290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00305-w ![]() |
[8] |
Islam Ayon S, Milon Islam Md (2019) Diabetes prediction: a deep learning approach. IJIEEB 11: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2019.02.03 ![]() |
[9] | Akter L, Islam MM (2021) Hepatocellular carcinoma patient's survival prediction using oversampling and machine learning techniques. 2nd International Conference on Robotics Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST) 2021: 445-450. |
[10] |
Akter L, Al Islam F, Islam M, et al. (2021) Prediction of cervical cancer from behavior risk using machine learning techniques. SN Computer Science 2: 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00551-6 ![]() |
[11] |
Wiens J, Shenoy ES (2018) Machine learning for healthcare: on the verge of a major shift in healthcare epidemiology. Clin Infect Dis 66: 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix731 ![]() |
[12] |
Clausen CE, Leventhal BL, Nytrø Ø, et al. (2021) Clinical decision support systems: An innovative approach to enhancing child and adolescent mental health services. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 60: 562-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.09.018 ![]() |
[13] |
Pombo N, Araújo P, Viana J (2014) Knowledge discovery in clinical decision support systems for pain management: a systematic review. Artif Intell Med 60: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2013.11.005 ![]() |
[14] | Campbell RJ (2013) The five rights of clinical decision support: CDS tools helpful for meeting meaningful use (web version updated February 2016). J AHIMA 84: 42-47. |
[15] |
Chadaga K, Prabhu S, Vivekananda BK, et al. (2021) Battling COVID-19 using machine learning: A review. Cogent Eng 8: 1958666. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2021.1958666 ![]() |
[16] |
Syeda HB, Syed M, Sexton KW, et al. (2021) Role of machine learning techniques to tackle the COVID-19 crisis: systematic review. JMIR Med Inf 9: e23811. https://doi.org/10.2196/23811 ![]() |
[17] |
Kaur B, Goyal B, Daniel E (2022) A survey on machine learning based medical assistive systems in current oncological sciences. Curr Med Imaging 18: 445-459. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210217154446 ![]() |
[18] | Kreuzberger N, Damen JA, Trivella M, et al. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012022.pub2 |
[19] |
Hassan N, Slight R, Weiand D, et al. (2021) Preventing sepsis; how can artificial intelligence inform the clinical decision-making process? A systematic review. Int J Med Inform 150: 104457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104457 ![]() |
[20] |
Wulff A, Montag S, Marschollek M, et al. (2019) Clinical decision-support systems for detection of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic shock in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Methods Inf Med 58: e43-e57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1695717 ![]() |
[21] |
Mouazer A, Tsopra R, Sedki K, et al. (2022) Decision-support systems for managing polypharmacy in the elderly: A scoping review. J Biomedl Inform 130: 104074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104074 ![]() |
[22] |
Nazari E, Biviji R, Roshandel D, et al. (2022) Decision fusion in healthcare and medicine: a narrative review. Mhealth 8: 8. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-21-15 ![]() |
[23] |
Wei Y, Zhou J, Wang Y, et al. (2020) A review of algorithm & hardware design for AI-based biomedical applications. IEEE T Biomed Circ S 14: 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2020.2974154 ![]() |
[24] | Chalmers I, Altman DG (1995) Systematic Reviews. London: BMJ Publications. |
[25] |
Needleman I, Moles DR, Worthington H (2005) Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality. Periodontology 2000 37: 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.37100.x ![]() |
[26] |
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151: 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 ![]() |
[27] | Higuchi K (2016) KH Coder 3 reference manual. Kioto (Japan): Ritsumeikan University. |
[28] |
Casal-Guisande M, Comesaña-Campos A, Dutra I, et al. (2022) Design and development of an intelligent clinical decision support system applied to the evaluation of breast cancer risk. J Pers Med 12: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020169 ![]() |
[29] | Vishwanath M, Jafarlou S, Shin I, et al. (2021) Investigation of machine learning and deep learning approaches for detection of mild traumatic brain injury from human sleep electroencephalogram. 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) 2021: 6134-6137. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630423 |
[30] |
Patel D, Msosa YJ, Wang T, et al. (2022) An implementation framework and a feasibility evaluation of a clinical decision support system for diabetes management in secondary mental healthcare using CogStack. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 22: 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01842-5 ![]() |
[31] |
Yoo J, Lee J, Rhee P-L, et al. (2020) Alert override patterns with a medication clinical decision support system in an academic emergency department: retrospective descriptive study. JMIR Med Inf 8: e23351. https://doi.org/10.2196/23351 ![]() |
[32] |
Beldhuis IE, Marapin RS, Jiang YY, et al. (2021) Cognitive biases, environmental, patient and personal factors associated with critical care decision making: a scoping review. J Crit Care 64: 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.04.012 ![]() |
[33] |
Kanwal S, Khan F, Alamri S, et al. (2022) COVID-opt-aiNet: A clinical decision support system for COVID-19 detection. Int J Imag Syst Tech 32: 444-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22695 ![]() |
[34] |
Bratic JS, Cunningham RM, Belleza-Bascon B, et al. (2019) Longitudinal evaluation of clinical decision support to improve influenza vaccine uptake in an integrated pediatric health care delivery system, Houston, Texas. Appl Clin Inform 10: 944-951. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400748 ![]() |
[35] |
Potier A, Dufay E, Dony A, et al. (2022) Pharmaceutical algorithms set in a real time clinical decision support targeting high-alert medications applied to pharmaceutical analysis. Int J Med Inf 160: 104708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104708 ![]() |
[36] |
Rittel AG, Highland KB, Maneval MS, et al. (2022) Development, implementation, and evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to improve naloxone coprescription within Military Health System pharmacies. Am J Health-Syst Ph 79: e58-e64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab206 ![]() |
[37] | Al-Jazairi A, AlQadheeb E, Alshammari L, et al. (2019) Clinical validity assessment of integrated dose range checking tool in a tertiary care hospital using an electronic health information system. Hosp Pharm 56: 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018578719867663 |
[38] |
Hammar T, Hamqvist S, Zetterholm M, et al. (2021) Current knowledge about providing drug-drug interaction services for patients—a scoping review. Pharmacy 9: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020069 ![]() |
[39] | Robert L, Rousseliere C, Beuscart J-B, et al. (2021) Integration of explicit criteria in a clinical decision support system through evaluation of acute kidney injury events. Pub Health Inform 281: 640-644. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210249 |
[40] |
Arasi S, Castelli S, Di Fraia M, et al. (2021) @IT2020: An innovative algorithm for allergen immunotherapy prescription in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy 51: 821-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13867 ![]() |
[41] |
Chien S-C, Chen Y-L, Chien C-H, et al. (2022) Alerts in clinical decision support systems (CDSS): a bibliometric review and content analysis. Healthcare 10: 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10040601 ![]() |
[42] |
Bradshaw RL, Kawamoto K, Kaphingst KA, et al. (2022) GARDE: a standards-based clinical decision support platform for identifying population health management cohorts. J Am Med Inform Assn 29: 928-936. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac028 ![]() |
[43] | Agarwal S, Glenton C, Tamrat T, et al. (2021) Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 7: CD012944. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012944.pub2 |
[44] |
Ru X, Zhu L, Ma Y, et al. (2022) Effect of an artificial intelligence-assisted tool on non-valvular atrial fibrillation anticoagulation management in primary care: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 23: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06250-8 ![]() |
[45] |
Premalatha G, Bai VT (2022) Wireless IoT and cyber-physical system for health monitoring using honey badger optimized least-squares support-vector machine. Wireless Pers Commun 124: 3013-3034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09500-9 ![]() |
[46] |
Xiao X, Xue L, Ye L, et al. (2021) Health care cost and benefits of artificial intelligence-assisted population-based glaucoma screening for the elderly in remote areas of China: a cost-offset analysis. BMC Public Health 21: 1065. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11097-w ![]() |
[47] |
Damoiseaux-Volman BA, van der Velde N, Ruige SG, et al. (2021) Effect of interventions with a clinical decision support system for hospitalized older patients: systematic review mapping implementation and design factors. JMIR Med Inform 9: e28023. https://doi.org/10.2196/28023 ![]() |
[48] |
Zolnoori M, McDonald MV, Barrón Y, et al. (2021) Improving patient prioritization during hospital-homecare transition: protocol for a mixed methods study of a clinical decision support tool implementation. JMIR Res Protoc 10: e20184. https://doi.org/10.2196/20184 ![]() |
[49] |
Abiodun TN, Okunbor D, Osamor VC (2022) Remote health monitoring in clinical trial using machine learning techniques: a conceptual framework. Health Technol 12: 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-022-00652-z ![]() |
[50] |
Malche T, Tharewal S, Tiwari PK, et al. (2022) Artificial intelligence of things- (AIoT-) based patient activity tracking system for remote patient monitoring. J Healthc Eng 2022: 8732213. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8732213 ![]() |
[51] |
Ramasamy LK, Khan F, Shah M, et al. (2022) Secure smart wearable computing through artificial intelligence-enabled internet of things and cyber-physical systems for health monitoring. Sensors 22: 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031076 ![]() |
[52] |
Jacobsohn GC, Leaf M, Liao F, et al. (2022) Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments. Healthcare 10: 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100598 ![]() |
[53] | Capan M, Schubel LC, Pradhan I, et al. Display and perception of risk: Analysis of decision support system display and its impact on perceived clinical risk of sepsis-induced health deterioration (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211073075 |
[54] |
Parente L, Falvo E, Castagnetti C, et al. (2022) Image-based monitoring of cracks: Effectiveness analysis of an open-source machine learning-assisted procedure. J Imaging 8: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8020022 ![]() |
[55] |
Shimizu T (2022) System 2 diagnostic process for the next generation of physicians: “inside” and “outside” brain—the interplay between human and machine. Diagnostics 12: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020356 ![]() |
[56] |
Tan YH, Liao Y, Tan Z, et al. (2021) Application of a machine learning algorithms in a wrist-wearable sensor for patient health monitoring during autonomous hospital bed transport. Sensors 21: 5711. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175711 ![]() |
[57] | Wu X, Liu C, Wang L, et al. Internet of things-enabled real-time health monitoring system using deep learning (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06440-6 |
[58] | Klatte K, Pauli-Magnus C, Love SB, et al. (2021) Monitoring strategies for clinical intervention studies. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 12: MR000051. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000051.pub2 |
[59] |
Zaman SB, Evans RG, Singh R, et al. (2021) Feasibility of community health workers using a clinical decision support system to screen and monitor non-communicable diseases in resource-poor settings: study protocol. Mhealth 7: 15. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-19-258 ![]() |
[60] |
Madar R, Ugon A, Ivanković D, et al. (2021) A web interface for antibiotic prescription recommendations in primary care: user-centered design approach. J Med Internet Res 23: e25741. https://doi.org/10.2196/25741 ![]() |
[61] | Lau L, Bagri H, Legal M, et al. (2021) Comparison of clinical importance of drug interactions identified by hospital pharmacists and a local clinical decision support system. Can J Hosp Pharm 74: 203-210. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v74i3.3147 |
[62] |
Islam MdM, Poly TN, Yang H-C, et al. (2021) Deep into laboratory: An artificial intelligence approach to recommend laboratory tests. Diagnostics 11: 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060990 ![]() |
[63] | Mouazer A, Leguillon R, Leroy B, et al. (2022) ABiMed: towards an innovative clinical decision support system for medication reviews and polypharmacy management. Inform Technol Clin Care Pub Heal 289: 61-64. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210859 |
[64] |
Alcalá-Rmz V, Galván-Tejada CE, García-Hernández A, et al. (2021) Identification of people with diabetes treatment through lipids profile using machine learning algorithms. Healthcare 9: 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040422 ![]() |
[65] |
Decherchi S, Pedrini E, Mordenti M, et al. (2021) Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in rare diseases. Front Med 8: 747612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.747612 ![]() |
[66] | Mogaveera D, Mathur V, Waghela S (2021) e-Health monitoring system with diet and fitness recommendation using machine learning. 6th International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) 2021: 694-700. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT50816.2021.9358605 |
[67] |
Denecke K, Gabarron E, Petersen C, et al. (2021) Defining participatory health informatics-a scoping review. Inform Health Soc Ca 46: 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1883028 ![]() |
[68] |
Zhang Q, Bai C, Yang LT, et al. (2021) A unified smart chinese medicine framework for healthcare and medical services. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 18: 882-890. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2019.2914447 ![]() |
[69] |
Herter WE, Khuc J, Cinà G, et al. (2022) Impact of a machine learning-based decision support system for urinary tract infections: prospective observational study in 36 primary care practices. JMIR Med Inform 10: e27795. https://doi.org/10.2196/27795 ![]() |
[70] |
Papandreou P, Gioxari A, Nimee F, et al. (2021) Application of clinical decision support system to assist breast cancer patients with lifestyle modifications during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomised controlled trial. Nutrients 13: 2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13062115 ![]() |
[71] |
Mlakar I, Lin S, Aleksandraviča I, et al. (2021) Patients-centered survivorShIp care plan after cancer treatments based on big data and artificial intelligence technologies (PERSIST): a multicenter study protocol to evaluate efficacy of digital tools supporting cancer survivors. BMC Med Inform Decis Making 21: 243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01603-w ![]() |
[72] | Asghari P (2021) A diagnostic prediction model for colorectal cancer in elderlies via internet of medical things. Int J Inf Tech 13: 1423-1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00663-5 |
[73] |
Emani S, Rui A, Rocha HAL, et al. (2022) Physicians' perceptions of and satisfaction with artificial intelligence in cancer treatment: A clinical decision support system experience and implications for low-middle-income countries. JMIR Cancer 8: e31461. https://doi.org/10.2196/31461 ![]() |
[74] |
Haddad T, Helgeson JM, Pomerleau KE, et al. (2021) Accuracy of an artificial intelligence system for cancer clinical trial eligibility screening: retrospective pilot study. JMIR Med Inform 9: e27767. https://doi.org/10.2196/27767 ![]() |
[75] |
Karthikeyan A, Garg A, Vinod PK, et al. (2021) Machine learning based clinical decision support system for early COVID-19 mortality rediction. Front Public Health 9: 626697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.626697 ![]() |
[76] |
Nayak SR, Nayak DR, Sinha U, et al. (2021) Application of deep learning techniques for detection of COVID-19 cases using chest X-ray images: a comprehensive study. Biomed Signal Process Control 64: 102365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102365 ![]() |
[77] |
Shanbehzadeh M, Nopour R, Kazemi-Arpanahi H (2022) Developing an artificial neural network for detecting COVID-19 disease. J Educ Health Promot 11: 153. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1017_21 ![]() |
[78] |
Dugdale CM, Rubins DM, Lee H, et al. (2021) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnostic clinical decision support: A pre-post implementation study of CORAL (COvid Risk cALculator). Clin Infect Dis 73: 2248-2256. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab111 ![]() |
[79] |
Romeo L, Frontoni E (2022) A unified hierarchical XGBoost model for classifying priorities for COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Pattern Recogn 121: 108197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108197 ![]() |
[80] |
Hatmal MM, Al-Hatamleh MAI, Olaimat AN, et al. (2022) Reported adverse effects and attitudes among Arab populations following COVID-19 vaccination: A large-scale multinational study implementing machine learning tools in predicting post-vaccination adverse effects based on predisposing factors. Vaccines 10: 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10030366 ![]() |
[81] |
Çelik Ertuğrul D, Çelik Ulusoy D (2022) A knowledge-based self-pre-diagnosis system to predict Covid-19 in smartphone users using personal data and observed symptoms. Expert Syst 39: e12716. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12716 ![]() |
[82] | Jiang W, Zeng G, Wang S, et al. (2022) Application of deep learning in lung cancer imaging diagnosis. J Healthc Eng 2022: 6107940. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6107940 |
[83] | Agaba A, Abdullahi M, Junaidu S, et al. (2022) Improved multi-classification of breast cancer histopathological images using handcrafted features and deep neural network (dense layer). Intelligent Syst Appl 14: 200066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200066 |
[84] |
Hussain T, Nugent C, Moore A, et al. (2021) A risk-based IoT decision-making framework based on literature review with human activity recognition case studies. Sensors 21: 4504. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134504 ![]() |
[85] |
Nguyen M, Corbin CK, Eulalio T, et al. (2021) Developing machine learning models to personalize care levels among emergency room patients for hospital admission. J Am Med Inform Assoc 28: 2423-2432. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab118 ![]() |
[86] |
Misra D, Avula V, Wolk DM, et al. (2021) Early detection of septic shock onset using interpretable machine learners. JCM 10: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020301 ![]() |
[87] |
Tarumi S, Takeuchi W, Chalkidis G, et al. (2021) Leveraging artificial intelligence to improve chronic disease care: Methods and application to pharmacotherapy decision support for type-2 diabetes mellitus. Methods Inf Med 60: e32-e43. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1728757 ![]() |
[88] |
De Ramón Fernández A, Ruiz Fernández D, Prieto Sánchez MT (2022) Prediction of the mode of delivery using artificial intelligence algorithms. Comput Meth Prog Biomed 219: 106740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106740 ![]() |
[89] |
Paviglianiti A, Randazzo V, Villata S, et al. (2022) A comparison of deep learning techniques for arterial blood pressure prediction. Cogn Comput 14: 1689-1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09910-0 ![]() |
[90] |
Ningrum DNA, Kung W-M, Tzeng I-S, et al. (2021) A deep learning model to predict knee osteoarthritis based on nonimage longitudinal medical record. J Multidiscip Healthc 14: 2477-2485. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S325179 ![]() |
[91] |
Hasan MM, Young GJ, Shi J, et al. (2021) A machine learning based two-stage clinical decision support system for predicting patients' discontinuation from opioid use disorder treatment: retrospective observational study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 21: 331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01692-7 ![]() |
[92] |
Zohra FT (2020) Prediction of different diseases and development of a clinical decision support system using naïve bayes classifier. IJRASET 8: 8-13. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.5002 ![]() |
[93] |
Andrianto B, Suprapto YK, Pratomo I, et al. (2019) Clinical decision support system for typhoid fever disease using classification techniques. International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA) IEEE, 2019: 248-252. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA.2019.8937286 ![]() |
[94] |
Sarkar D, Bali R, Sharma T (2018) Practical Machine Learning with Python. CA: Apress Berkeley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3207-1 ![]() |
[95] |
Cypko MA, Stoehr M (2019) Digital patient models based on Bayesian networks for clinical treatment decision support. Minim Invasiv Ther 28: 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1584572 ![]() |
[96] | Laxmi P, Gupta D, Gopalapillai R, et al. (2021) A scalable multi-disease modeled CDSS based on Bayesian network approach for commonly occurring diseases with a NLP-Based GUI. Intelligent Systems, Technologies and Applications: Proceedings of Sixth ISTA 2020, India. Singapor: Springer 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0730-1_11 |
[97] |
Edye EO, Kurucz JF, Lois L, et al. (2021) Applying Bayesian networks to help physicians diagnose respiratory diseases in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE URUCON 2021: 368-371. https://doi.org/10.1109/URUCON53396.2021.9647280 ![]() |
[98] |
Gupta A, Liu T, Shepherd S (2020) Clinical decision support system to assess the risk of sepsis using tree augmented Bayesian networks and electronic medical record data. Health Inform J 26: 841-861. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219852872 ![]() |
[99] |
Subasi A (2020) Machine learning techniques. Practical Machine Learning for Data Analysis Using Python. Elsevier: Academic Press 91-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821379-7.00003-5 ![]() |
[100] |
Araz OM, Olson D, Ramirez-Nafarrate A (2019) Predictive analytics for hospital admissions from the emergency department using triage information. Int J Prod Econ 208: 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.024 ![]() |
[101] | Bruce P, Bruce A, Gedeck P (2020) Practical statistics for data scientists: 50+ essential concepts using R and Python. USA: O'Reilly Media. |
[102] |
Sraitih M, Jabrane Y, Hajjam El Hassani A (2021) An automated system for ECG arrhythmia detection using machine learning techniques. J Clin Med 10: 5450. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225450 ![]() |
[103] |
Wu X, Kumar V, Ross Quinlan J, et al. (2008) Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl Inf Syst 14: 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2 ![]() |
[104] |
Mukherjee R, Sadhu S, Kundu A (2022) Heart disease detection using feature selection based KNN classifier. Proceedings of Data Analytics and Management. Singapore: Springer 577-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6289-8_48 ![]() |
[105] | Kannan S (2022) An automated clinical decision support system for predicting cardiovascular disease using ensemble learning approach. Concurrency Comput Pract Exp 34: e7007. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.7007 |
[106] |
Sharma SK, Vijayakumar K, Kadam VJ, et al. (2022) Breast cancer prediction from microRNA profiling using random subspace ensemble of LDA classifiers via Bayesian optimization. Multimed Tools Appl 81: 41785-41805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11653-x ![]() |
[107] |
Yang S, Bian J, Sun Z, et al. (2018) Early detection of disease using electronic health records and Fisher's Wishart discriminant analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 140: 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.299 ![]() |
[108] | De Andres J, Ten-Esteve A, Harutyunyan A, et al. (2021) Predictive clinical decision support system using machine learning and imaging biomarkers in patients with neurostimulation therapy: a pilot study. Pain Physician 24: E1279-E1290. |
[109] |
Fernandes M, Vieira SM, Leite F, et al. (2020) Clinical decision support systems for triage in the emergency department using intelligent systems: a review. Artif Intell Med 102: 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101762 ![]() |
[110] |
Dreiseitl S, Ohno-Machado L (2002) Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform 35: 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00034-0 ![]() |
[111] |
Ehn M, Derneborg M, Revenäs Å, et al. (2021) User-centered requirements engineering to manage the fuzzy front-end of open innovation in e-health: A study on support systems for seniors' physical activity. Int J Med Inform 154: 104547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104547 ![]() |
[112] |
Ylenia C, Chiara DL, Giovanni I, et al. (2021) A clinical decision support system based on fuzzy rules and classification algorithms for monitoring the physiological parameters of type-2 diabetic patients. MBE 18: 2654-2674. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021135 ![]() |
[113] |
Hamedan F, Orooji A, Sanadgol H, et al. (2020) Clinical decision support system to predict chronic kidney disease: A fuzzy expert system approach. Int J Med Inform 138: 104134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104134 ![]() |
[114] | Shafi I, Ansari S, Din S, et al. (2021) Artificial neural networks as clinical decision support systems. Concurrency Comput Pract Exp 33: e6342. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6342 |
[115] |
Pappada SM, Owais MH, Cameron BD, et al. (2020) An artificial neural network-based predictive model to support optimization of inpatient glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 22: 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0252 ![]() |
[116] |
Jin Y, Qin C, Huang Y, et al. (2020) Multi-domain modeling of atrial fibrillation detection with twin attentional convolutional long short-term memory neural networks. Knowl-Based Syst 193: 105460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105460 ![]() |
[117] |
Faust O, Acharya UR (2021) Automated classification of five arrhythmias and normal sinus rhythm based on RR interval signals. Expert Syst Appl 181: 115031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115031 ![]() |
[118] | Haque MdR, Islam MdM, Iqbal H, et al. (2018) Performance evaluation of random forests and artificial neural networks for the classification of liver disorder. International Conference on Computer, Communication, Chemical, Material and Electronic Engineering (IC4ME2). Rajshahi: IEEE 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC4ME2.2018.8465658 |
[119] |
Lyu J, Zhang J (2019) BP neural network prediction model for suicide attempt among Chinese rural residents. J Affect Disorders 246: 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.111 ![]() |
[120] |
Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, et al. (2020) An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. Npj Digital Medicine 3: 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y ![]() |
[121] |
Antoniadi AM, Du Y, Guendouz Y, et al. (2021) Current challenges and future opportunities for XAI in machine learning-based clinical decision support systems: a systematic review. Appl Sci 11: 5088. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115088 ![]() |
1. | Tariq A. Aljaaidi, Deepak B. Pachpatte, Ram N. Mohapatra, The Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer Type Inequalities via Generalized Proportional Fractional Integral Concerning Another Function, 2022, 2022, 1687-0425, 1, 10.1155/2022/6716830 | |
2. | Saad Ihsan Butt, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Muhammad Nadeem, Nabil Mlaiki, İşcan İmdat, Thabet Abdeljawad, (m,n)-Harmonically polynomial convex functions and some Hadamard type inequalities on the co-ordinates, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 4677, 10.3934/math.2021275 | |
3. | Ifra Bashir Sial, Nichaphat Patanarapeelert, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Thanin Sitthiwirattham, On Some New Ostrowski–Mercer-Type Inequalities for Differentiable Functions, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 132, 10.3390/axioms11030132 | |
4. | Deniz Uçar, Inequalities for different type of functions via Caputo fractional derivative, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 12815, 10.3934/math.2022709 | |
5. | Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Y.S. Hamed, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Kamsing Nonlaopon, New midpoint type Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer inequalities pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional operators, 2023, 65, 11100168, 689, 10.1016/j.aej.2022.10.019 | |
6. | Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani, Abdullahi Yusuf, The generalization of Hermite-Hadamard type Inequality with exp-convexity involving non-singular fractional operator, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 7040, 10.3934/math.2022392 | |
7. | Churong Chen, Discrete Caputo Delta Fractional Economic Cobweb Models, 2023, 22, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-022-00708-5 | |
8. | Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Ravi P. Agarwal, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Khadijah M. Abualnaja, Hadamard–Mercer, Dragomir–Agarwal–Mercer, and Pachpatte–Mercer Type Fractional Inclusions for Convex Functions with an Exponential Kernel and Their Applications, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 836, 10.3390/sym14040836 | |
9. | Muhammad Tariq, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Asif Ali Shaikh, A Comprehensive Review of the Hermite–Hadamard Inequality Pertaining to Fractional Integral Operators, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 1953, 10.3390/math11081953 | |
10. | Loredana Ciurdariu, Eugenia Grecu, Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-Type Inequalities for Three-Times Differentiable Functions, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 413, 10.3390/axioms13060413 | |
11. | Muhammad Aamir Ali, Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Elisabeth Köbis, Asma Hanif, Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer Inequalities Associated with Twice-Differentiable Functions with Applications, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 114, 10.3390/axioms13020114 | |
12. | Muhammad Aamir Ali, Christopher S. Goodrich, On some new inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer midpoint and trapezoidal type in q-calculus, 2024, 44, 0174-4747, 35, 10.1515/anly-2023-0019 | |
13. | Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Ifra Sial, Muhammad Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Jiraporn Reunsumrit, A new variant of Jensen inclusion and Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for interval-valued functions, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 5553, 10.2298/FIL2317553S | |
14. | Muhammad Aamir Ali, Zhiyue Zhang, Michal Fečkan, GENERALIZATION OF HERMITE–HADAMARD–MERCER AND TRAPEZOID FORMULA TYPE INEQUALITIES INVOLVING THE BETA FUNCTION, 2024, 54, 0035-7596, 10.1216/rmj.2024.54.331 | |
15. | Bahtiyar Bayraktar, Péter Kórus, Juan Eduardo Nápoles Valdés, Some New Jensen–Mercer Type Integral Inequalities via Fractional Operators, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 517, 10.3390/axioms12060517 | |
16. | THANIN SITTHIWIRATTHAM, MIGUEL VIVAS-CORTEZ, MUHAMMAD AAMIR ALI, HÜSEYIN BUDAK, İBRAHIM AVCI, A STUDY OF FRACTIONAL HERMITE–HADAMARD–MERCER INEQUALITIES FOR DIFFERENTIABLE FUNCTIONS, 2024, 32, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X24400164 | |
17. | Muhammad Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Elisabeth Köbis, Some new and general versions of q-Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer inequalities, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 4531, 10.2298/FIL2314531A |