Research article Special Issues

An iteration process for a general class of contractive-like operators: Convergence, stability and polynomiography

  • In this paper, we propose a three step iteration process and analyze the performance of the process for a contractive-like operators. It is observed that this iterative procedure is faster than several iterative methods in the existing literature. To support the claim, a numerical example is presented using Maple 13. Some images are generated by using this iteration method for complex cubic polynomials. We believe that our presented work enrich the polynomiography software.

    Citation: Ti-Ming Yu, Abdul Aziz Shahid, Khurram Shabbir, Nehad Ali Shah, Yong-Min Li. An iteration process for a general class of contractive-like operators: Convergence, stability and polynomiography[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6699-6714. doi: 10.3934/math.2021393

    Related Papers:

    [1] Noor Muhammad, Ali Asghar, Samina Irum, Ali Akgül, E. M. Khalil, Mustafa Inc . Approximation of fixed point of generalized non-expansive mapping via new faster iterative scheme in metric domain. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2856-2870. doi: 10.3934/math.2023149
    [2] Godwin Amechi Okeke, Akanimo Victor Udo, Rubayyi T. Alqahtani, Nadiyah Hussain Alharthi . A faster iterative scheme for solving nonlinear fractional differential equations of the Caputo type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28488-28516. doi: 10.3934/math.20231458
    [3] Muhammad Waseem Asghar, Mujahid Abbas, Cyril Dennis Enyi, McSylvester Ejighikeme Omaba . Iterative approximation of fixed points of generalized $ \alpha _{m} $-nonexpansive mappings in modular spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26922-26944. doi: 10.3934/math.20231378
    [4] Imo Kalu Agwu, Umar Ishtiaq, Naeem Saleem, Donatus Ikechi Igbokwe, Fahd Jarad . Equivalence of novel IH-implicit fixed point algorithms for a general class of contractive maps. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 841-872. doi: 10.3934/math.2023041
    [5] Dong Ji, Yao Yu, Chaobo Li . Fixed point and endpoint theorems of multivalued mappings in convex $ b $-metric spaces with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7589-7609. doi: 10.3934/math.2024368
    [6] Junaid Ahmad, Kifayat Ullah, Hasanen A. Hammad, Reny George . On fixed-point approximations for a class of nonlinear mappings based on the JK iterative scheme with application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13663-13679. doi: 10.3934/math.2023694
    [7] Abdelkader Belhenniche, Amelia Bucur, Liliana Guran, Adrian Nicolae Branga . Using computational techniques of fixed point theory for studying the stationary infinite horizon problem from the financial field. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 2369-2388. doi: 10.3934/math.2024117
    [8] Godwin Amechi Okeke, Akanimo Victor Udo, Rubayyi T. Alqahtani, Melike Kaplan, W. Eltayeb Ahmed . A novel iterative scheme for solving delay differential equations and third order boundary value problems via Green's functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6468-6498. doi: 10.3934/math.2024315
    [9] Godwin Amechi Okeke, Austine Efut Ofem, Thabet Abdeljawad, Manar A. Alqudah, Aziz Khan . A solution of a nonlinear Volterra integral equation with delay via a faster iteration method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 102-124. doi: 10.3934/math.2023005
    [10] Mudassir Shams, Nasreen Kausar, Serkan Araci, Liang Kong, Bruno Carpentieri . Highly efficient family of two-step simultaneous method for all polynomial roots. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1755-1771. doi: 10.3934/math.2024085
  • In this paper, we propose a three step iteration process and analyze the performance of the process for a contractive-like operators. It is observed that this iterative procedure is faster than several iterative methods in the existing literature. To support the claim, a numerical example is presented using Maple 13. Some images are generated by using this iteration method for complex cubic polynomials. We believe that our presented work enrich the polynomiography software.



    Fixed point theory provides a suitable framework to solve a system of linear and nonlinear functional equations, which are applicable in various areas of research such as engineering, chemistry, game theory, economics, etc. The Picard iteration procedure is one of the most simplest iterative procedures and is used for approximating unique fixed point (FP) for mapping/operators satisfying contractive type conditions. However, in case of slightly weaker contractive operators such as nonexpansive mappings, the Picard iterative procedure fails to converge.

    So, it is important to consider iterative procedures which converge for the larger class of operators. Various iterative techniques were developed in literature to estimate the FPs of certain operators of practical nature. Some famous iterative procedures are Mann [1], Ishikawa [2], Agarwal et al. [3], Noor [4], SP [5], CR [6], Abbas & Nazir [7], Picard-Mann [8], Picard-S [9] and Kadioglu & Yildirim [10].

    The rate of convergence and stability are some of the most distinguishing features of an iterative procedure which are always desirable. These criterions play vital role when one iterative procedure is compared with the other. For instance, Newton and quasi Newton methods are always preferred for solutions of the system of nonlinear Eqs on the basis of their rate of convergence given that an appropriate initial guess to the solution is known. Rhoades [11] proved that the convergence of the well-known Mann iteration faster than that of Ishikawa iteration for the class of decreasing function and vice versa for the class of increasing functions. It is observed that [3], the convergence rate of Agarwal et al. iteration and Picard iteration is same and both are faster than the Mann iteration for the class of contraction mappings. Authors in [7] introduced an iteration with better and faster convergence than Agarwal et al. iteration. The authors in [6] claimed that the CR iteration is either equivalent or faster than Mann, Picard, Ishikawa, Agarwal et al., SP, and Noor iterations for the class of quasi-contractive operators in the setting of Banach spaces. Karakaya with his coauthors in [12] proved that for contraction mappings, the CR iteration is faster than S-iteration. One other interesting result can be found in [9] and for other details, we refer [13,14,15] and references therein.

    Motivated by the work quoted above, the authors [16] proposed a new iteration known as K iteration in Banach spaces and show that K iterative procedure is faster than many other iterative schemes. We compare the convergence of the K iterative procedure numerically with numerous iteration processes in the existing literature by using generalized mapping. The graphs of complex polynomials are also drawn using the K-iterative procedure. All the work done in this paper is for a general class of contractive-like operators.

    Consider a real normed sapces E and a mapping T:EE. If T(x)=x than xE is called FP of T and the set of FPs of T is represented by F(T). Now, we give a brief description of existing iterations which are relevant to our work in this paper.

    The well-known Picard-iteration sequence {xn} is:

    {x0E,xn+1=Txn, n0, (2.1)

    The Mann-iteration [1] is a one step iterative procedure which described by the following sequence {xn}:

    {x0E,xn+1=(1α1n)xn+α1nTxn,n0, (2.2)

    where {α1n}n=0ϵ[0,1].

    The Ishikawa iteration process [2] is a two step iterative process given by the following sequence {xn}:

    {x0E,xn+1=(1α1n)xn+α1nTyn,yn=(1α2n)xn+α2nTxn,n0, (2.3)

    where {α1n}n=0,  {α2n}n=0  ϵ[0,1].

    Motivated by [2], a two step iteration was proposed in [3], which is known as Agarwal et al. iteration;

    {x0E,xn+1=(1α1n)Txn+α1nTyn,yn=(1α2n)xn+α2nTxn,n0, (2.4)

    where {α1n}n=0,  {α2n}n=0  ϵ[0,1].

    In 2013, Khan [8] proposed a new iteration namely 'Picard-Mann-hybrid iteration' which is given by the sequence

    {x0E,xn+1=Tyn,yn=(1α1n)xn+α1nTxn,n0, (2.5)

    where {α1n}n=0 [0,1].

    Noor iteration [4] is a three step iterative procedure defined by the following scheme {xn}:

    {x0E,xn+1=(1α1n)xn+α1nTyn,yn=(1α2n)xn+α2nTzn,zn=(1α3n)xn+α3nTxn,n0, (2.6)

    where {α1n}n=0,{α2n}n=0,  {α3n}n=0  ϵ  [0,1].

    The SP-iteration is a three step iteration introduced in 2011 [5] as;

    {x0E,xn+1=(1α1n)yn+α1nTyn,yn=(1α2n)zn+α2nTzn,zn=(1α3n)xn+α3nTxn,n0, (2.7)

    where {α1n}n=0,{α2n}n=0,  {α3n}n=0  ϵ  [0,1].

    The CR iteration was introduced Chugh et al. in 2012 [6] as;

    {x0E,xn+1=(1α1n)yn+α1nTyn,yn=(1α2n)Txn+α2nTzn,zn=(1α3n)xn+α3nTxn,n0, (2.8)

    where {α1n}n=0,{α2n}n=0,  {α3n}n=0  ϵ  [0,1].

    The Picard-S-iteration [9] was introduced as;

    {u0E,un+1=Tvn,vn=(1α1n)Tun+α1nTwn,wn=(1α2n)un+α2nTun,n0, (2.9)

    where {α1n}n=0,  {α2n}n=0  ϵ  [0,1].

    Kadioglu & Yildirim [10] studied the following iteration procedure:

    {u0E,un+1=Tvn,vn=(1α1n)wn+α1nTwn,wn=(1α2n)un+α2nTun,n0, (2.10)

    where {α1n}n=0,  {α2n}n=0  ϵ  [0,1].

    Ullah and Arshad [16] introduce following a new modified iteration-process, known as K iteration process:

    {x0E,xn+1=Tyn,yn=T((1α1n)zn+α1nTzn),zn=(1α2n)xn+α2nTxn,n0, (2.11)

    where {α1n}n=0,  {α2n}n=0  ϵ  [0,1].

    The iteration procedure (2.11) is stable and performs better than all above mentioned iterations.

    The different stability results have been studied by Osilike in [17] by using the following definition of contractive

    Definition 1. Let x,yX, then we have 0δ<1 and L0 satisfying;

    d(Tx,Ty)δd(x,y)+Ld(x,Tx). (2.12)

    The authors in [18] proved the results of stability by using the following more general definition;

    d(Tx,Ty)δd(x,y)+ϕ(d(x,Tx)). (2.13)

    Here x,yX and 0δ<1. Moreover ϕ:R+R+ is aan increasing function satisfying ϕ(0)=0.

    Recently, Bosede and Rhoades [19] pointed out that assumptions (2.12), (2.13) and its several variants are pointless. Indeed, if x=Tx=x, then (2.12) and (2.13) reduce to the following: For x,yX, there exist 0δ<1 satisfying

    d(x,Ty)δd(x,y) (2.14)

    and in the real normed spaces, for each x,yX, there exist 0δ<1 such that

    xTyδxy. (2.15)

    For examples to illustrate that the (2.15) is more general than that of (2.12) and (2.13) see [20].

    Lemma 1. [21] Consider the real sequences {ψn}n=0 and {φn}n=0 that are non-negative and

    ψn+1(1ϕn)ψn+φn,

    holds, where ϕn(0,1) for all n0N,n=0 ϕn= and φnϕn0 as n, then limnψn=0.

    Lemma 2. [22] Consider a real non-negative sequence {ψn}n=0 and n0N and

    ψn+1(1ϕn)ψn+ϕnφn,

    holds for all nn0, where ϕn(0,1) for all nN,n=0 ϕn= and φn0 for all nN. Then

    0limnsupψnlimnsupφn.

    Definition 2. ([23]) Consider two convergent real sequences {an}n=0 and {bn}n=0 that converges to a and b, respectively. The convergence rate of {an}n=0 is faster than that of {bn}n=0 if we have

    limnanabnb=0

    Definition 3. ([23]) Consider two iterations {un}n=0 and {vn}n=0 converge to the common FP p. If unpan and vnpbn, for all n0, where {an}n=0 and {bn}n=0 two convergent sequences of real number that converges to 0. Then the convergence of {un}n=0 is faster than that of {vn}n=0 if the convergence of {an}n=0 is faster than that of {bn}n=0.

    Definition 4. ([24]) Let {tn}n=0 be an arbitrary sequence in C. Then, an iteration procedure xn+1=f(T,xn), converging to fixed point p, is said to be T-stable or stable with respect to T, if for ϵn=tn+1f(T,tn) ,n=0,1,2,3,..., we have limnn=0limntn=x.

    Theorem 3.1. Consider a real normed (E,.) and a mapping T:EE with a FP x satisfying (2.15). Let {xn}n=0 be defined by (2.11), where {α1n}n=0 and {α2n}n=0 are in [0,1] and n=0α1nα2n=. Then {xn}n=0 converges to x (strongly).

    Proof. From (2.11), by means of simple calculation, we get

    znx=(1(1δ)α2n)xnx, (3.1)

    and

    ynx=T((1α1n)zn+α1nTzn)xδ(1α1n)zn+α1nTznxδ(1α1n)(znx)+α1n(Tznx)δ[(1α1n)znx+δα1nznx]=δ[(1α1n)+δα1n]znx. (3.2)

    By using (3.1) in (3.2) we obtain

    ynxδ[(1(1δ)α1n)(1(1δ)α2n)]xnx=δ[1(1δ)α1n(1δ)α2n+(1δ)2α1nα2n]xnxδ[1(1δ)α1nα2n(1δ)α1nα2n+(1δ)α1nα2n]xnx=δ[1(1δ)α1nα2n]xnx. (3.3)

    Thus from (3.3)

    xn+1x=Tynxδynxδ2(1(1δ)α1nα2n)xnx. (3.4)

    Now, by (3.4) we inductively obtain,

    xn+1x(δ2(n+1))k=0(1(1δ)α1kα2k)x0x,n0. (3.5)

    Using 0<δ<1,{α1n}n=0 and {α2n}n=0 are in [0,1] and n=0α1nα2n=, we get

    limnxn+1x=0

    that is, {xn}n=0 converges strongly to x.

    Theorem 3.2. Consider a real normed space (E,.) and a mapping T:EE with a FP x satisfying (2.15). Let {xn}n=0 be defined by (2.11), where {α1n}n=0,  {α2n}n=0 ϵ  [0,1] such that n=0α1nα2n=. Then, the {xn}n=0 is Tstable.

    Proof. The sequence defined in (2.11) converges to x by Theorem 3.1 so consider real sequences {tn}n=0,{un}n=0 and {vn}n=0 in E, where

    {tn+1=Tun,un=T((1α1n)vn+α1nTvn),vn=(1α2n)tn+α2nTtn,n0, (3.6)

    Let n=tn+1Tun. We shall prove that limnn=0limntn=x. Let limnn=0, Then we shall prove that limntn=x for mapping satisfying condition (2.15). That is,

    tn+1xtn+1Tun+Tunxn+Tunx (3.7)

    Using condition (2.15), we have

    Tunxδunx (3.8)

    substituting (3.8) in (3.7), we get

    tn+1xn+δunx (3.9)

    Then using (3.3)

    tn+1xn+δ[δ(1(1δ)α1nα2n]tnx (3.10)

    Since 0<α1α2<α1nα2n,

    tn+1xn+δ2(1(1δ)α1α2)tnx (3.11)

    by mean of Lemma 1 in (3.11) we get

    limntn=x.

    Conversely, let limntn=x. We show that limnn=0

    n=tn+1Tuntn+1x+xTuntn+1x+δunxtn+1x+δ2(1(1δ)α1nα2n)tnx

    Hence limnn=0 and the iteration (2.11) is T-stable.

    Theorem 3.3. Consider a real normed space (E,.) and a mapping T:EE with FP x satisfying (2.15). Let the sequences {xn}n=0 and {un}n=0 as in (2.11) and (2.10) respectively, where {α1n}n=0 and {α2n}n=0 are in [0,1] and n=0α1nα2n=. Then the convergence of iteration scheme {xn}n=0 to x of T is faster than that of {un}n=0.

    Proof. Using Theorem 3.1,

    xn+1xδ2(n+1)x0xk=0(1(1δ)α1kα2k),n0. (3.12)

    Let

    an=δ2(n+1)x0xk=0(1(1δ)α1kα2k),n0, (3.13)

    From (2.10), we have

    wnx=(1α2n)un+α2nTunx=(1α2n)(unx)+α2n(Tunx)(1α2n)unx+δα2nunx=(1(1δ)α2n)unx. (3.14)

    Similarly

    vnx=(1α1n)wn+α1nTwnx=(1α1n)(wnx)+α1n(Twnx)(1α1n)wnx+δα1nwnx=(1(1δ)α1n)wnx. (3.15)

    From (3.14) and (3.15), we get

    vnx(1(1δ)α1n)(1(1δ)α2n)unx=(1(1δ)α2n(1δ)α1n+(1δ)2α1nα2n)unx(1(1δ)α1nα2n(1δ)α1nα2n+(1δ)α1nα2n)unx(1(1δ)α1nα2n)unx. (3.16)
    un+1xTvnxδvnxδ(1α1nα2n(1δ))(unx). (3.17)

    Now, by (3.17) we inductively obtain,

    un+1xδn+1u0xk=0(1(1δ)α1kα2k),n0. (3.18)

    Let

    bn=δn+1u0xk=0(1(1δ)α1kα2k),n0. (3.19)

    Since 0<δ<1, then

    limnxn+1xun+1x=limnanbn=limnδn+1=0.

    Example 3.4. Consider the usual normed space E=R, S=[1,100] and a mapping T:SS defined as Tx=x28x+40 xS. Then, T satisfies the condition (2.15) with δ[0.5222,0.9987] and has a unique FP x=5. Take α1n=α2n=α3n=12 and initial guess x0=u0=100. It can be observed from Tables 1 and 2 that the convergence of K iteration to x=5 is faster than that of SP, Noor, Ishikawa ARS, Picard-Mann, Abbas, CR, Picard-S and Kadioglu & Yildirim iterations.

    Table 1.  Comparison of convergence of different iteraitons.
    Iter. No. AS iteration Picard-S Kadioglu & Yildirim Abbas CR
    0 100 100 100 100 100
    1 88.3923 91.2889 92.2564 92.7394 93.2231
    2 76.8413 82.6076 84.5359 85.4988 86.4638
    3 65.3657 73.9626 76.8430 78.2820 79.7244
    12 5.00000 5.88655 11.9615 16.4250 21.3496
    16 5.00000 5.00188 5.02389 5.37398
    19 5.00000 5.00001 5.00038
    20 5.00000 5.00003
    21 5.00000

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Comparison of convergence of different iterations.
    Iter. No. Picard-Maan ARS SP Noor Ishikawa Maan
    0 100 100 100 100 100 100
    1 94.1899 95.1574 95.1580 96.6119 97.0950 98.0624
    2 88.3923 90.3232 90.3246 93.2280 94.1930 96.1262
    3 82.6088 85.4984 85.5007 89.8486 91.2942 94.1913
    24 5.00000 5.01818 5.04720 21.6024 31.9246 54.0134
    29 5.00000 5.00004 9.29078 19.0506 44.6622
    31 5.00000 6.69608 14.4208 40.9632
    52 5.00000 5.00018 7.57905
    57 5.00000 5.32335
    78 5.00000

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Polynomiography defined by Kalantari in 2005 as "the art and science of visualization in approximation of the zeros of complex polynomials, via fractal and non fractal images produced using the convergence properties of iteration functions" [25]. The image obtained is named "polynomiograph". Polynomiography gives a different approach to solve the old problem by utilizing some calculations and computer. Like fractals [26], the polynomiographs can be obtained by means of various iterations. A "polynomiographer" can control the shape in a predictable way by using various iteration for a variety of complex polynomials [27,28,29,30]. These patterns can be used for textures, carpet and tapestry designs etc.

    The famous Newton method is given by;

    zn+1=znp(zn)p(zn),n=0,1,2,..., (4.1)

    for complex polynomial p. Here zoC is an initial guess. Here, we modify Newton method by means of AS iteration the orbits for generation of polynomiograph is totally different than the orbits of Picard iteration and the iterations studied in [27,28,29,30]. Thus the obtained Basins of attraction are entirely different from the existing ones.

    Consider a Banach space X=C and vo=(xo,yo) and α1n=α1, α2n=α2 such that 0<α11 and 0α21. Setting (2.11) in (4.1) for the Newton method, we obtain the following formula that is used to generate polinomiographs:

    {zn+1=T(unp(un)p(un)),un=T((1α1)vn+α1(vnp(vn)p(vn))),vn=(1α2)zn+α2(znp(zn)p(zn)), n0, (4.2)

    where 0<α11 and 0α21.

    Polynomiographs for complex polynomial equation z31=0 are presented in Figures 16 and Figures 712 presented examples of complex polynomial equation z32z+2=0 with the use of the following parameters: Resolution 500×500 pixels and were generated with maximum number of iterations =15, accuracy ε=0.001 and A=[2,2]2. For polynomiographs presented in the following figures, one can observe that for changing parameters α1 and α2 images have different basins of attraction.

    Figure 1.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.75,α2=0.15.
    Figure 2.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.5,α2=0.2.
    Figure 3.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.3,α2=0.5.
    Figure 4.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.45,α2=0.85.
    Figure 5.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.2,α2=0.8.
    Figure 6.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.05,α2=0.04.
    Figure 7.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.1,α2=0.3.
    Figure 8.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.3,α2=0.3.
    Figure 9.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.5,α2=0.4.
    Figure 10.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.85,α2=0.15.
    Figure 11.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.02,α2=0.05.
    Figure 12.  Polynomiograph for α1=0.6,α2=0.7.

    We have introduced K iteration for finding FP of a general class of contractive-like operators. Theorem 3.1 shows that our iterative method converges strongly to the FP of contractive-like operators. In Theorem 3.3 it is concluded that K iteration procedure performs faster than the leading Kadioglu & Yildirim iteration process (2.10). Example 3.4 is given to verify our claim. We have presented polynomiographs for complex cubic polynomials via K iteration process. A large variety of nicely looking aesthetic patterns can be obtained by changing parameters α1 and α2 and ε involved in our iterative procedure.

    The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.

    This work was sponsored in part by NSFC China, Grant (11571067).



    [1] W. R. Mann, Mean value methods in iteration, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 4 (1953), 506–510. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1953-0054846-3
    [2] S. Ishikawa, Fixed points by a new iteration method, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 44 (1974), 147–150. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0336469-5
    [3] R. Agarwal, D. O. Regan, D. R. Sahu, Iterative construction of fixed points of nearly asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal., 8 (2007), 61.
    [4] M. A. Noor, New approximation schemes for general variational inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 251 (2000), 217–229. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7042
    [5] W. Phuengrattana, S. Suantai, On the rate of convergence of Mann, Ishikawa, Noor and SP-iterations for continuous functions on an arbitrary interval, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 3006–3014. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.12.022
    [6] R. Chugh, V. Kumar, S. Kumar, Strong convergence of a new three step iterative scheme in banach spaces, Am. J. Comput. Math., 2 (2012), 345. doi: 10.4236/ajcm.2012.24048
    [7] M. Abbas, T. Nazir, A new faster iteration process applied to constrained minimization and feasibility problems, Matematiqki Vesnik, 66 (2014), 223–234.
    [8] S. H. Khan, A Picard-Mann hybrid iterative process, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2013 (2013), 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-1
    [9] F. Gürsoy, V. Karakaya, A Picard-S hybrid type iteration method for solving a differential equation with retarded argument, 2014. Available from: https://arXiv.org/abs/1403.2546.
    [10] N. Kadioglu, I. Yildirim, Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by a faster iteration process, 2014. Available from: https://arXiv.org/abs/1402.6530.
    [11] B. Rhoades, Some fixed point iteration procedures, Int. J. Math. Math.Sci., 14 (1991), 1–16. doi: 10.1155/S0161171291000017
    [12] V. Karakaya, F. Gürsoy, M. Ertürk, Comparison of the speed of convergence among various iterative schemes, 2014. Available from: https://arXiv.org/abs/1402.6080.
    [13] S. E. Mukiawa, The effect of time-varying delay damping on the stability of porous elastic system, Open J. Math. Sci., 5 (2021), 147–161.
    [14] G. Twagirumukiza, E. Singirankabo, Mathematical analysis of a delayed HIV/AIDS model with treatment and vertical transmission, Open J. Math. Sci., 5 (2021), 128–146. doi: 10.30538/oms2021.0151
    [15] U. K. Qureshi, A. A. Shaikhi, F. K. Shaikh, S. K. Hazarewal, T. A. Laghari, New Simpson type method for solving nonlinear equations, Open J. Math. Sci., 5 (2021), 94–100.
    [16] K. Ullah, M. Arshad, New three-step iteration process and fixed point approximation in Banach spaces, J. Linear Topol. Algebra, 7 (2018), 87–100.
    [17] M. Osilike, Stability results for the ishikawa fixed point iteration procedure, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 26 (1995), 937–946.
    [18] C. Imoru, M. Olatinwo, On the stability of Picard and Mann iteration. Carpath, J. Math., 19 (2003), 155–160.
    [19] A. O. Bosede, B. Rhoades, Stability of picard and mann iteration for a general class of functions, J. Adv. Math. Stud., 3 (2010), 23–26.
    [20] C. Chidume, J. Olaleru, Picard iteration process for a general class of contractive mappings, J. Niger. Math. Soc., 33 (2014), 19–23.
    [21] X. Weng, Fixed point iteration for local strictly pseudo-contractive mapping, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 113 (1991), 727–731. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1991-1086345-8
    [22] ş. şoltuz, T. Grosan, Data dependence for ishikawa iteration when dealing with contractive-like operators, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2008 (2008), 1–7.
    [23] V. Berinde, Iterative Approximation of Fixed Points, Berlin: Springer, 2007.
    [24] A. M. Harder, Fixed Point Theory and Stability Results for Fixed Points Iteration Procedures, Ph. D. thesis, University of Missouri-Rolla, 1987.
    [25] K. Bahman, Polynomial Root-Finding and Polynomiography, Singapore: World Scientific, 2008.
    [26] B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, New York: WH freeman, 1982.
    [27] Y. C. Kwun, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, K. Gdawiec, S. M. Kang, Mandelbrot and Julia sets via Jungck–CR iteration with s–convexity, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 12167–12176. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892013
    [28] Y. C. Kwun, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, M. Abbas, S. M. Kang, Fractal generation in modified Jungck–S orbit, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 35060–35071. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904677
    [29] H. Qi, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, Y. Chu, Fixed point results for fractal generation of complex polynomials involving sine function via non-standard iterations, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 154301–154317. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018090
    [30] Y. C. Kwun, A. A. Shahid, W. Nazeer, M. Abbas, S. M. Kang, Fractal generation via CR iteration scheme with S-convexity, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 69986–69997. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919520
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Bashir Nawaz, Kifayat Ullah, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Convergence analysis of Picard–SP iteration process for generalized $$\alpha $$–nonexpansive mappings, 2024, 1017-1398, 10.1007/s11075-024-01859-z
    2. Bashir Nawaz, Kifayat Ullah, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Convergence Analysis of a Picard–CR Iteration Process for Nonexpansive Mappings, 2025, 1432-7643, 10.1007/s00500-025-10515-0
    3. Bashir Nawaz, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Kifayat Ullah, Effectiveness of Picard–Abbas iteration for fixed point approximation of mappings satisfying condition (E), 2025, 03770427, 116649, 10.1016/j.cam.2025.116649
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2939) PDF downloads(180) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(12)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog