In this paper, we propose a three step iteration process and analyze the performance of the process for a contractive-like operators. It is observed that this iterative procedure is faster than several iterative methods in the existing literature. To support the claim, a numerical example is presented using Maple 13. Some images are generated by using this iteration method for complex cubic polynomials. We believe that our presented work enrich the polynomiography software.
Citation: Ti-Ming Yu, Abdul Aziz Shahid, Khurram Shabbir, Nehad Ali Shah, Yong-Min Li. An iteration process for a general class of contractive-like operators: Convergence, stability and polynomiography[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6699-6714. doi: 10.3934/math.2021393
Related Papers:
[1]
Noor Muhammad, Ali Asghar, Samina Irum, Ali Akgül, E. M. Khalil, Mustafa Inc .
Approximation of fixed point of generalized non-expansive mapping via new faster iterative scheme in metric domain. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2856-2870.
doi: 10.3934/math.2023149
[2]
Godwin Amechi Okeke, Akanimo Victor Udo, Rubayyi T. Alqahtani, Nadiyah Hussain Alharthi .
A faster iterative scheme for solving nonlinear fractional differential equations of the Caputo type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28488-28516.
doi: 10.3934/math.20231458
[3]
Muhammad Waseem Asghar, Mujahid Abbas, Cyril Dennis Enyi, McSylvester Ejighikeme Omaba .
Iterative approximation of fixed points of generalized $ \alpha _{m} $-nonexpansive mappings in modular spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26922-26944.
doi: 10.3934/math.20231378
[4]
Imo Kalu Agwu, Umar Ishtiaq, Naeem Saleem, Donatus Ikechi Igbokwe, Fahd Jarad .
Equivalence of novel IH-implicit fixed point algorithms for a general class of contractive maps. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 841-872.
doi: 10.3934/math.2023041
[5]
Dong Ji, Yao Yu, Chaobo Li .
Fixed point and endpoint theorems of multivalued mappings in convex $ b $-metric spaces with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7589-7609.
doi: 10.3934/math.2024368
[6]
Junaid Ahmad, Kifayat Ullah, Hasanen A. Hammad, Reny George .
On fixed-point approximations for a class of nonlinear mappings based on the JK iterative scheme with application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13663-13679.
doi: 10.3934/math.2023694
[7]
Abdelkader Belhenniche, Amelia Bucur, Liliana Guran, Adrian Nicolae Branga .
Using computational techniques of fixed point theory for studying the stationary infinite horizon problem from the financial field. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 2369-2388.
doi: 10.3934/math.2024117
[8]
Godwin Amechi Okeke, Akanimo Victor Udo, Rubayyi T. Alqahtani, Melike Kaplan, W. Eltayeb Ahmed .
A novel iterative scheme for solving delay differential equations and third order boundary value problems via Green's functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6468-6498.
doi: 10.3934/math.2024315
[9]
Godwin Amechi Okeke, Austine Efut Ofem, Thabet Abdeljawad, Manar A. Alqudah, Aziz Khan .
A solution of a nonlinear Volterra integral equation with delay via a faster iteration method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 102-124.
doi: 10.3934/math.2023005
[10]
Mudassir Shams, Nasreen Kausar, Serkan Araci, Liang Kong, Bruno Carpentieri .
Highly efficient family of two-step simultaneous method for all polynomial roots. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1755-1771.
doi: 10.3934/math.2024085
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a three step iteration process and analyze the performance of the process for a contractive-like operators. It is observed that this iterative procedure is faster than several iterative methods in the existing literature. To support the claim, a numerical example is presented using Maple 13. Some images are generated by using this iteration method for complex cubic polynomials. We believe that our presented work enrich the polynomiography software.
1.
Introduction
Fixed point theory provides a suitable framework to solve a system of linear and nonlinear functional equations, which are applicable in various areas of research such as engineering, chemistry, game theory, economics, etc. The Picard iteration procedure is one of the most simplest iterative procedures and is used for approximating unique fixed point (FP) for mapping/operators satisfying contractive type conditions. However, in case of slightly weaker contractive operators such as nonexpansive mappings, the Picard iterative procedure fails to converge.
So, it is important to consider iterative procedures which converge for the larger class of operators. Various iterative techniques were developed in literature to estimate the FPs of certain operators of practical nature. Some famous iterative procedures are Mann [1], Ishikawa [2], Agarwal et al. [3], Noor [4], SP [5], CR [6], Abbas & Nazir [7], Picard-Mann [8], Picard-S [9] and Kadioglu & Yildirim [10].
The rate of convergence and stability are some of the most distinguishing features of an iterative procedure which are always desirable. These criterions play vital role when one iterative procedure is compared with the other. For instance, Newton and quasi Newton methods are always preferred for solutions of the system of nonlinear Eqs on the basis of their rate of convergence given that an appropriate initial guess to the solution is known. Rhoades [11] proved that the convergence of the well-known Mann iteration faster than that of Ishikawa iteration for the class of decreasing function and vice versa for the class of increasing functions. It is observed that [3], the convergence rate of Agarwal et al. iteration and Picard iteration is same and both are faster than the Mann iteration for the class of contraction mappings. Authors in [7] introduced an iteration with better and faster convergence than Agarwal et al. iteration. The authors in [6] claimed that the CR iteration is either equivalent or faster than Mann, Picard, Ishikawa, Agarwal et al., SP, and Noor iterations for the class of quasi-contractive operators in the setting of Banach spaces. Karakaya with his coauthors in [12] proved that for contraction mappings, the CR iteration is faster than S∗-iteration. One other interesting result can be found in [9] and for other details, we refer [13,14,15] and references therein.
Motivated by the work quoted above, the authors [16] proposed a new iteration known as K∗ iteration in Banach spaces and show that K∗ iterative procedure is faster than many other iterative schemes. We compare the convergence of the K∗ iterative procedure numerically with numerous iteration processes in the existing literature by using generalized mapping. The graphs of complex polynomials are also drawn using the K∗-iterative procedure. All the work done in this paper is for a general class of contractive-like operators.
2.
Preliminaries
Consider a real normed sapces E and a mapping T:E→E. If T(x∗)=x∗ than x∗∈E is called FP of T and the set of FPs of T is represented by F(T). Now, we give a brief description of existing iterations which are relevant to our work in this paper.
The well-known Picard-iteration sequence {xn} is:
{x0∈E,xn+1=Txn,n≥0,
(2.1)
The Mann-iteration [1] is a one step iterative procedure which described by the following sequence {xn}:
{x0∈E,xn+1=(1−α1n)xn+α1nTxn,n≥0,
(2.2)
where {α1n}∞n=0ϵ[0,1].
The Ishikawa iteration process [2] is a two step iterative process given by the following sequence {xn}:
The iteration procedure (2.11) is stable and performs better than all above mentioned iterations.
The different stability results have been studied by Osilike in [17] by using the following definition of contractive
Definition 1. Let x,y∈X, then we have 0≤δ<1 and L≥0 satisfying;
d(Tx,Ty)≤δd(x,y)+Ld(x,Tx).
(2.12)
The authors in [18] proved the results of stability by using the following more general definition;
d(Tx,Ty)≤δd(x,y)+ϕ(d(x,Tx)).
(2.13)
Here x,y∈X and 0≤δ<1. Moreover ϕ:R+→R+ is aan increasing function satisfying ϕ(0)=0.
Recently, Bosede and Rhoades [19] pointed out that assumptions (2.12), (2.13) and its several variants are pointless. Indeed, if x=Tx∗=x∗, then (2.12) and (2.13) reduce to the following: For x,y∈X, there exist 0≤δ<1 satisfying
d(x∗,Ty)≤δd(x∗,y)
(2.14)
and in the real normed spaces, for each x,y∈X, there exist 0≤δ<1 such that
‖x∗−Ty‖≤δ‖x∗−y‖.
(2.15)
For examples to illustrate that the (2.15) is more general than that of (2.12) and (2.13) see [20].
Lemma 1.[21]Consider the real sequences {ψn}∞n=0 and {φn}∞n=0 that arenon-negative and
ψn+1≤(1−ϕn)ψn+φn,
holds, where ϕn∈(0,1) for all n0∈N,∞∑n=0ϕn=∞ and φnϕn→0 as n→∞, then limn→∞ψn=0.
Lemma 2.[22]Consider a real non-negative sequence {ψn}∞n=0 and n0∈N and
ψn+1≤(1−ϕn)ψn+ϕnφn,
holds for all n≥n0, where ϕn∈(0,1) for all n∈N,∞∑n=0ϕn=∞ and φn≥0 forall n∈N. Then
0≤limn→∞supψn≤limn→∞supφn.
Definition 2. ([23]) Consider two convergent real sequences {an}∞n=0 and {bn}∞n=0 that converges to a and b, respectively. The convergence rate of {an}∞n=0 is faster than that of {bn}∞n=0 if we have
limn→∞‖an−a‖‖bn−b‖=0
Definition 3. ([23]) Consider two iterations {un}∞n=0 and {vn}∞n=0 converge to the common FP p. If ‖un−p‖≤an and ‖vn−p‖≤bn, for all n≥0, where {an}∞n=0 and {bn}∞n=0 two convergent sequences of real number that converges to 0. Then the convergence of {un}∞n=0 is faster than that of {vn}∞n=0 if the convergence of {an}∞n=0 is faster than that of {bn}∞n=0.
Definition 4. ([24]) Let {tn}∞n=0 be an arbitrary sequence in C. Then, an iteration procedure xn+1=f(T,xn), converging to fixed point p, is said to be T-stable or stable with respect to T, if for ϵn=‖tn+1−f(T,tn)‖,n=0,1,2,3,..., we have limn→∞∈n=0⇔limn→∞tn=x∗.
3.
Main results
Theorem 3.1.Consider a real normed (E,‖.‖) and amapping T:E→E with a FP x∗ satisfying (2.15). Let {xn}∞n=0 be defined by (2.11), where {α1n}∞n=0 and {α2n}∞n=0 arein [0,1] and ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞.Then {xn}∞n=0 converges to x∗ (strongly).
Proof. From (2.11), by means of simple calculation, we get
Using 0<δ<1,{α1n}∞n=0 and {α2n}∞n=0 are in [0,1] and ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞, we get
limn→∞‖xn+1−x∗‖=0
that is, {xn}∞n=0 converges strongly to x∗.
Theorem 3.2.Consider a real normed space (E,‖.‖) and a mapping T:E→E with a FP x∗ satisfying (2.15). Let {xn}∞n=0 be defined by (2.11), where {α1n}∞n=0,{α2n}∞n=0ϵ[0,1] such that ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞. Then, the {xn}∞n=0 is T−stable.
Proof. The sequence defined in (2.11) converges to x∗ by Theorem 3.1 so consider real sequences {tn}∞n=0,{un}∞n=0 and {vn}∞n=0 in E, where
Let ∈n=‖tn+1−Tun‖. We shall prove that limn→∞∈n=0⇔limn→∞tn=x∗. Let limn→∞∈n=0, Then we shall prove that limn→∞tn=x∗ for mapping satisfying condition (2.15). That is,
‖tn+1−x∗‖≤‖tn+1−Tun‖+‖Tun−x∗‖≤∈n+‖Tun−x∗‖
(3.7)
Using condition (2.15), we have
‖Tun−x∗‖≤δ‖un−x∗‖
(3.8)
substituting (3.8) in (3.7), we get
‖tn+1−x∗‖≤∈n+δ‖un−x∗‖
(3.9)
Then using (3.3)
‖tn+1−x∗‖≤∈n+δ[δ(1−(1−δ)α1nα2n]‖tn−x∗‖
(3.10)
Since 0<α1α2<α1nα2n,
‖tn+1−x∗‖≤∈n+δ2(1−(1−δ)α1α2)‖tn−x∗‖
(3.11)
by mean of Lemma 1 in (3.11) we get
limn→∞tn=x∗.
Conversely, let limn→∞tn=x∗. We show that limn→∞∈n=0
Hence limn→∞∈n=0 and the iteration (2.11) is T-stable.
Theorem 3.3.Consider a real normed space (E,‖.‖)and a mapping T:E→E with FP x∗ satisfying (2.15).Let the sequences {xn}∞n=0 and {un}∞n=0as in (2.11) and (2.10) respectively, where {α1n}∞n=0 and {α2n}∞n=0 are in [0,1] and ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞. Then the convergenceof iteration scheme {xn}∞n=0 to x∗ of T isfaster than that of {un}∞n=0.
Example 3.4. Consider the usual normed space E=R, S=[1,100] and a mapping T:S→S defined as Tx=√x2−8x+40∀x∈S. Then, T satisfies the condition (2.15) with δ∈[0.5222,0.9987] and has a unique FP x∗=5. Take α1n=α2n=α3n=12 and initial guess x0=u0=100. It can be observed from Tables 1 and 2 that the convergence of K∗ iteration to x∗=5 is faster than that of SP, Noor, Ishikawa ARS, Picard-Mann, Abbas, CR, Picard-S and Kadioglu & Yildirim iterations.
Table 1.
Comparison of convergence of different iteraitons.
Polynomiography defined by Kalantari in 2005 as "the art and science of visualization in approximation of the zeros of complex polynomials, via fractal and non fractal images produced using the convergence properties of iteration functions" [25]. The image obtained is named "polynomiograph". Polynomiography gives a different approach to solve the old problem by utilizing some calculations and computer. Like fractals [26], the polynomiographs can be obtained by means of various iterations. A "polynomiographer" can control the shape in a predictable way by using various iteration for a variety of complex polynomials [27,28,29,30]. These patterns can be used for textures, carpet and tapestry designs etc.
4.1. Modification of AS iteration
The famous Newton method is given by;
zn+1=zn−p(zn)p′(zn),n=0,1,2,...,
(4.1)
for complex polynomial p. Here zo∈C is an initial guess. Here, we modify Newton method by means of AS iteration the orbits for generation of polynomiograph is totally different than the orbits of Picard iteration and the iterations studied in [27,28,29,30]. Thus the obtained Basins of attraction are entirely different from the existing ones.
Consider a Banach space X=C and vo=(xo,yo) and α1n=α1,α2n=α2 such that 0<α1≤1 and 0≤α2≤1. Setting (2.11) in (4.1) for the Newton method, we obtain the following formula that is used to generate polinomiographs:
Polynomiographs for complex polynomial equation z3−1=0 are presented in Figures 1–6 and Figures 7–12 presented examples of complex polynomial equation z3−2z+2=0 with the use of the following parameters: Resolution 500×500 pixels and were generated with maximum number of iterations =15, accuracy ε=0.001 and A=[−2,2]2. For polynomiographs presented in the following figures, one can observe that for changing parameters α1 and α2 images have different basins of attraction.
We have introduced K∗ iteration for finding FP of a general class of contractive-like operators. Theorem 3.1 shows that our iterative method converges strongly to the FP of contractive-like operators. In Theorem 3.3 it is concluded that K∗ iteration procedure performs faster than the leading Kadioglu & Yildirim iteration process (2.10). Example 3.4 is given to verify our claim. We have presented polynomiographs for complex cubic polynomials via K∗ iteration process. A large variety of nicely looking aesthetic patterns can be obtained by changing parameters α1 and α2 and ε involved in our iterative procedure.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.
Acknowledgment
This work was sponsored in part by NSFC China, Grant (11571067).
S. Ishikawa, Fixed points by a new iteration method, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 44 (1974), 147–150. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0336469-5
[3]
R. Agarwal, D. O. Regan, D. R. Sahu, Iterative construction of fixed points of nearly asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal., 8 (2007), 61.
[4]
M. A. Noor, New approximation schemes for general variational inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 251 (2000), 217–229. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7042
[5]
W. Phuengrattana, S. Suantai, On the rate of convergence of Mann, Ishikawa, Noor and SP-iterations for continuous functions on an arbitrary interval, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 3006–3014. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.12.022
[6]
R. Chugh, V. Kumar, S. Kumar, Strong convergence of a new three step iterative scheme in banach spaces, Am. J. Comput. Math., 2 (2012), 345. doi: 10.4236/ajcm.2012.24048
[7]
M. Abbas, T. Nazir, A new faster iteration process applied to constrained minimization and feasibility problems, Matematiqki Vesnik, 66 (2014), 223–234.
[8]
S. H. Khan, A Picard-Mann hybrid iterative process, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2013 (2013), 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-1
[9]
F. Gürsoy, V. Karakaya, A Picard-S hybrid type iteration method for solving a differential equation with retarded argument, 2014. Available from: https://arXiv.org/abs/1403.2546.
[10]
N. Kadioglu, I. Yildirim, Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by a faster iteration process, 2014. Available from: https://arXiv.org/abs/1402.6530.
[11]
B. Rhoades, Some fixed point iteration procedures, Int. J. Math. Math.Sci., 14 (1991), 1–16. doi: 10.1155/S0161171291000017
[12]
V. Karakaya, F. Gürsoy, M. Ertürk, Comparison of the speed of convergence among various iterative schemes, 2014. Available from: https://arXiv.org/abs/1402.6080.
[13]
S. E. Mukiawa, The effect of time-varying delay damping on the stability of porous elastic system, Open J. Math. Sci., 5 (2021), 147–161.
[14]
G. Twagirumukiza, E. Singirankabo, Mathematical analysis of a delayed HIV/AIDS model with treatment and vertical transmission, Open J. Math. Sci., 5 (2021), 128–146. doi: 10.30538/oms2021.0151
[15]
U. K. Qureshi, A. A. Shaikhi, F. K. Shaikh, S. K. Hazarewal, T. A. Laghari, New Simpson type method for solving nonlinear equations, Open J. Math. Sci., 5 (2021), 94–100.
[16]
K. Ullah, M. Arshad, New three-step iteration process and fixed point approximation in Banach spaces, J. Linear Topol. Algebra, 7 (2018), 87–100.
[17]
M. Osilike, Stability results for the ishikawa fixed point iteration procedure, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 26 (1995), 937–946.
[18]
C. Imoru, M. Olatinwo, On the stability of Picard and Mann iteration. Carpath, J. Math., 19 (2003), 155–160.
[19]
A. O. Bosede, B. Rhoades, Stability of picard and mann iteration for a general class of functions, J. Adv. Math. Stud., 3 (2010), 23–26.
[20]
C. Chidume, J. Olaleru, Picard iteration process for a general class of contractive mappings, J. Niger. Math. Soc., 33 (2014), 19–23.
[21]
X. Weng, Fixed point iteration for local strictly pseudo-contractive mapping, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 113 (1991), 727–731. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1991-1086345-8
[22]
ş. şoltuz, T. Grosan, Data dependence for ishikawa iteration when dealing with contractive-like operators, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2008 (2008), 1–7.
[23]
V. Berinde, Iterative Approximation of Fixed Points, Berlin: Springer, 2007.
[24]
A. M. Harder, Fixed Point Theory and Stability Results for Fixed Points Iteration Procedures, Ph. D. thesis, University of Missouri-Rolla, 1987.
[25]
K. Bahman, Polynomial Root-Finding and Polynomiography, Singapore: World Scientific, 2008.
[26]
B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, New York: WH freeman, 1982.
[27]
Y. C. Kwun, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, K. Gdawiec, S. M. Kang, Mandelbrot and Julia sets via Jungck–CR iteration with s–convexity, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 12167–12176. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892013
[28]
Y. C. Kwun, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, M. Abbas, S. M. Kang, Fractal generation in modified Jungck–S orbit, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 35060–35071. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904677
[29]
H. Qi, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, Y. Chu, Fixed point results for fractal generation of complex polynomials involving sine function via non-standard iterations, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 154301–154317. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018090
[30]
Y. C. Kwun, A. A. Shahid, W. Nazeer, M. Abbas, S. M. Kang, Fractal generation via CR iteration scheme with S-convexity, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 69986–69997. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919520
This article has been cited by:
1.
Bashir Nawaz, Kifayat Ullah, Krzysztof Gdawiec,
Convergence analysis of Picard–SP iteration process for generalized $$\alpha $$–nonexpansive mappings,
2024,
1017-1398,
10.1007/s11075-024-01859-z
2.
Bashir Nawaz, Kifayat Ullah, Krzysztof Gdawiec,
Convergence Analysis of a Picard–CR Iteration Process for Nonexpansive Mappings,
2025,
1432-7643,
10.1007/s00500-025-10515-0
3.
Bashir Nawaz, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Kifayat Ullah,
Effectiveness of Picard–Abbas iteration for fixed point approximation of mappings satisfying condition (E),
2025,
03770427,
116649,
10.1016/j.cam.2025.116649
Ti-Ming Yu, Abdul Aziz Shahid, Khurram Shabbir, Nehad Ali Shah, Yong-Min Li. An iteration process for a general class of contractive-like operators: Convergence, stability and polynomiography[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6699-6714. doi: 10.3934/math.2021393
Ti-Ming Yu, Abdul Aziz Shahid, Khurram Shabbir, Nehad Ali Shah, Yong-Min Li. An iteration process for a general class of contractive-like operators: Convergence, stability and polynomiography[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6699-6714. doi: 10.3934/math.2021393