Brain network can be well used in emotion analysis to analyze the brain state of subjects. A novel dynamic brain network in arousal is proposed to analyze brain states and emotion with Electroencephalography (EEG) signals.
Time factors is integrated to construct a dynamic brain network under high and low arousal conditions. The transfer entropy is adopted in the dynamic brain network. In order to ensure the authenticity of dynamics and connections, surrogate data are used for testing and analysis. Channel norm information features are proposed to optimize the data and evaluate the level of activity of the brain.
The frontal lobe, temporal lobe, and parietal lobe provide the most information about emotion arousal. The corresponding stimulation state is not maintained at all times. The number of active brain networks under high arousal conditions is generally higher than those under low arousal conditions. More consecutive networks show high activity under high arousal conditions among these active brain networks. The results of the significance analysis of the features indicates that there is a significant difference between high and low arousal.
Compared with traditional methods, the method proposed in this paper can analyze the changes of subjects' brain state over time in more detail. The proposed features can be used to quantify the brain network for accurate analysis.
The proposed dynamic brain network bridges the research gaps in lacking time resolution and arousal conditions in emotion analysis. We can clearly get the dynamic changes of the overall and local details of the brain under high and low arousal conditions. Furthermore, the active segments and brain regions of the subjects were quantified and evaluated by channel norm information.This method can be used to realize the feature extraction and dynamic analysis of the arousal dimension of emotional EEG, further explore the emotional dimension model, and also play an auxiliary role in emotional analysis.
Citation: Yunyuan Gao, Zhen Cao, Jia Liu, Jianhai Zhang. A novel dynamic brain network in arousal for brain states and emotion analysis[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 7440-7463. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021368
Brain network can be well used in emotion analysis to analyze the brain state of subjects. A novel dynamic brain network in arousal is proposed to analyze brain states and emotion with Electroencephalography (EEG) signals.
Time factors is integrated to construct a dynamic brain network under high and low arousal conditions. The transfer entropy is adopted in the dynamic brain network. In order to ensure the authenticity of dynamics and connections, surrogate data are used for testing and analysis. Channel norm information features are proposed to optimize the data and evaluate the level of activity of the brain.
The frontal lobe, temporal lobe, and parietal lobe provide the most information about emotion arousal. The corresponding stimulation state is not maintained at all times. The number of active brain networks under high arousal conditions is generally higher than those under low arousal conditions. More consecutive networks show high activity under high arousal conditions among these active brain networks. The results of the significance analysis of the features indicates that there is a significant difference between high and low arousal.
Compared with traditional methods, the method proposed in this paper can analyze the changes of subjects' brain state over time in more detail. The proposed features can be used to quantify the brain network for accurate analysis.
The proposed dynamic brain network bridges the research gaps in lacking time resolution and arousal conditions in emotion analysis. We can clearly get the dynamic changes of the overall and local details of the brain under high and low arousal conditions. Furthermore, the active segments and brain regions of the subjects were quantified and evaluated by channel norm information.This method can be used to realize the feature extraction and dynamic analysis of the arousal dimension of emotional EEG, further explore the emotional dimension model, and also play an auxiliary role in emotional analysis.
[1] | B. Farahi, Emotional intelligence: Affective computing in architecture and design, Architectural Intelligence: Selected Papers from the 1st International Conference on Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication (CDRF 2019), 2020,235-251. |
[2] | Z. H. Zeng, M. Pantic, G. I. Roisman, T. S. Huang, A survey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 31 (2009), 39-58. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.52 |
[3] | J. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Liu, EEG-based emotion recognition using an improved radial basis function neural network, J. Amb. Intell. Human. Comput., (2020). |
[4] | A. Momennezhad, EEG-based emotion recognition utilizing wavelet coefficients, Mult. Tools Appl., 77 (2018), 27089-27106. doi: 10.1007/s11042-018-5906-8 |
[5] | J. Posner, J. Russell, B. Peterson, The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology, Development Psychopathol., 17 (2005), 715-734. |
[6] | F. Citron, Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies, Brain Language, 122 (2012), 211-226. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.007 |
[7] | A. Haag, S. Goronzy, P. Schaich, J. Williams, Emotion recognition using bio-sensors: First steps towards an automatic system, Affective Dialogue Systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004, 36-48. |
[8] | A. Keil, M. M. Müller, T. Gruber, C. Wienbruch, M. Stolarova, T. Elbert, Effects of emotional arousal in the cerebral hemispheres: A study of oscillatory brain activity and event, Clin. Neurophysiol., 112 (2001), 2057-2068. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00654-X |
[9] | J. H. Kang, H. M. Ahn, J. W. Jeong, I. Hwang, H. T. Kim, S. H. Kim, et al., The modulation of parietal gamma oscillations in the human electroencephalogram with cognitive reappraisal, Neuroreport, 23 (2012), 995. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835a6475 |
[10] | Y. Tang, Y. Li, J. Wang, S. Tong, Y. Jing, Induced gamma activity in eeg represents cognitive control during detecting emotional expressions, 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering-in-Medicine-and-Biology-Society (EMBS), (2011). |
[11] | D. J. Oathes, W. J. Ray, A. S.Yamasaki, T. D. Borkovec, L. G. Castonguay, M. G. Newman, et al., Worry, generalized anxiety disorder, and emotion: Evidence from the EEG gamma band, Biol. Psychol., 79 (2008), 165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.005 |
[12] | Y. X. Yang, Z. K. Gao, X. Wang, Y. L. Li, J. W. Han, A recurrence quantification analysis-based channel-frequency convolutional neural network for emotion recognition from EEG, Chaos Interdiscipl. J. Nonlinear Sci., 28 (2018), 085724. doi: 10.1063/1.5023857 |
[13] | M. Li, B. L. L. S. Member, Emotion classification based on gamma-band EEG, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. |
[14] | V. Calhoun, R. Miller, G. Pearlson, T. J. N. Adal, The chronnectome: Time-varying connectivity networks as the next frontier in fMRI data discovery, Neuron, 84 (2014), 262-274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.015 |
[15] | P. Balsam, H. V. J. T. Volkinburg, T. Perception, Effects of emotional valence and arousal on time perception, Tim. Time Percept., 2 (2014), 360. doi: 10.1163/22134468-00002034 |
[16] | S. G. S. S. Droit-Voletsupb/Sup, S. J. C. Emot, Emotional time distortions: The fundamental role of arousal, Cogn. Emot., 26 (2012), 847-862. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.625401 |
[17] | M. Kaiser, A tutorial in connectome analysis: Topological and spatial features of brain networks, NeuroImage, 57 (2011), 892-907. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.025 |
[18] | V. Gonuguntla, R. Mallipeddi, K. C. Veluvolu, Identification of emotion associated brain functional network with phase locking value, Eng. Med. Biol. Society, (2016), 4515-4518. |
[19] | F. Bartolomei, A. Trébuchon, M. Gavaret, J. Régis, F. Wendling, P. J. C. N. Chauvel, Acute alteration of emotional behaviour in epileptic seizures is related to transient desynchrony in emotion-regulation networks, Clin. Neurophysiol., 116 (2005), 2473-2479. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.05.013 |
[20] | F. Hou, C. Liu, Z. Yu, X. Xu, J. Zhang, C. K. Peng, et al., Age-related alterations in electroencephalography connectivity and network topology during n-back working memory task, Front. Human Neurosci., 12 (2018), 484. |
[21] | M. Bola, B. A. Sabel, Dynamic reorganization of brain functional networks during cognition, Neuroimage, 114 (2015), 398-413. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.057 |
[22] | A. B. Eder, L. Hartmut, R. Klaus, S. Schweinberger, Automatic response activation in sequential affective priming: an ERP study, Social Cognit. Affect. Neurosci., (2012), 436-445. |
[23] | K. Schmidt, P. Patnaik, E. A. Kensigner, Emotion's influence on memory for spatial and temporal context, Cognit. Emot., 25 (2011), 229-243. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.483123 |
[24] | M. Batashvili, P. A. Staples, I. Baker, D. Sheffield, Exploring the relationship between gamma-band activity and maths anxiety, Cognit. Emot., (2019), 1-11. |
[25] | M. Yan, H. Shihui, M. Gelfand, The role of gamma interbrain synchrony in social coordination when humans face territorial threats, Social Cognit. Affect. Neurosci., (2017), 1614-1623. |
[26] | S. Shao, C. Guo, W. Luk, S. Weston, Accelerating transfer entropy computation, 2014 International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology (FPT), 2014, 60-67. |
[27] | R. Vicente, M. Wibral, M. Lindner, G. Pipa, Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences, J. Comput. Neurosci., 30 (2011), 45-67. doi: 10.1007/s10827-010-0262-3 |
[28] | M. Wibral, R. Vicente, M. Lindner, Transfer Entropy in Neuroscience, Understanding Complex Systems, 2014. |
[29] | E. Maris, R. Oostenveld, Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data, J. Neurosci. Methods, 164 (2007), 177-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 |
[30] | S. Koelstra, C. Muhl, M. Soleymani, J. S. Lee, A. Yazdani, T. Ebrahimi, et al., DEAP: A database for emotion analysis using physiological signals, IEEE Transact. Affect. Comput., 3 (2012), 18-31. doi: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.15 |
[31] | H. Kuai, H. Xu, J. Yan, Emotion recognition from EEG using rhythm synchronization patterns with joint time-frequency-space correlation, International Conference on Brain Informatics, 2017,159-168. |
[32] | M. R. Sutherland, M. J. C. Mather, Emotion, Arousal (but not valence) amplifies the impact of salience, Cognit. Emotion, (2017). |
[33] | F. Dolcos, K. S. LaBar, R. Cabeza, Dissociable effects of arousal and valence on prefrontal activity indexing emotional evaluation and subsequent memory: an event-related fMRI study, Neuroimage, 23 (2004), 64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.015 |
[34] | M. Nielen, D. J. Heslenfeld, K. Heinen, J. Strien, M. P. Witter, C. Jonker, et al., Distinct brain systems underlie the processing of valence and arousal of affective pictures, Brain Cogn., 71 (2009), 387-396. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.05.007 |
[35] | J. Leite, S. Carvalho, S. Galdo-Alvarez, J. Alves, A. Sampaio, Ó. F. Gonçalves, Affective picture modulation: Valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 83 (2012), 375-381. |
[36] | J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, G. G. Berntson, Handbook of Psychophysiology, Cambridge University Press, 2017. |
[37] | S. Aydın, S. Demirtaş, S. Yetkin, Cortical correlations in wavelet domain for estimation of emotional dysfunctions, Neural Comput. Appl., 30 (2018), 1085-1094. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2731-8 |
[38] | W. L. Zheng, J. Y. Zhu, B.L. Lu, Identifying stable patterns over time for emotion recognition from EEG, Affect. Comput. IEEE Transact., 2016. |
[39] | G. P. Lee, K. J. Meador, D. W. Loring, J. D. Allison, W. S. Brown, L. K. Paul, et al., Neural substrates of emotion as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, Cognit. Behav. Neurol. Offic. J. Society Behav. Cognit. Neurol., 17 (2004), 9. doi: 10.1097/00146965-200403000-00002 |
[40] | J. E. Chen, C. Chang, M. Greicius, G. Glover, Introducing co-activation pattern metrics to quantify spontaneous brain network dynamics, NeuroImage, 111 (2015). |
[41] | C. Kuhbandner, P. Spachtholz, B. PastÖTter, Bad things come easier to the mind but harder to the body: Evidence from brain oscillations, Cognit. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 16 (2016), 768-778. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0429-0 |
[42] | Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, X. Ji, Tools, Applications, EEG-based classification of emotions using empirical mode decomposition and autoregressive model, Mult. Tools Appl., 2018. |