Biomechanical and neuromuscular strategies on backward somersault landing in artistic gymnastics: A case study

Chengliang Wu; Weiya Hao; Wei He; Xiaofei Xiao; Xuhong Li; Wei Sun; Chengliang Wu; Weiya Hao; Wei He; Xiaofei Xiao; Xuhong Li; Wei Sun

doi:10.3934/mbe.2019293

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

2019, Volume 16, Issue 5: 5862-5876. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019293

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Biomechanical and neuromuscular strategies on backward somersault landing in artistic gymnastics: A case study

1.
School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China
2.
School of Physical Education and Health, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404100, China
3.
China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, 100061, China
4.
School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong, 246005, China
5.
School of Physical Education and Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310004, China
6.
Sports Biomechanics Lab, Shandong Institute of Sports Science, Jinan, 250002, China

Received: 01 March 2019 Accepted: 17 June 2019 Published: 24 June 2019

Landing is a crucial factor in gymnastics competitions, but the underlying biomechanical and neuromuscular strategies remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics and neuromuscular strategies of landing for backward somersault. A 19-segment human model was developed and bilateral lower-limb joint loadings were estimated using computer stimulation. Bilateral lower-limb joint angles, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), impulse, joint reaction force, joint torque, power, work, stiffness and electromyogram (EMG) of the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and lateral gastrocnemius were presented during initial (touchdown to peak vGRF) and terminal impact-phases of landing (peak vGRF to vGRF equaling to body weight). The hip, knee, and ankle joints were rapidly flexed (8°, 20°, and 18°, respectively) during initial impact-phase and maintained at around 90°, 120°, and 60°, respectively terminal impact-phase. Flexor and extensor torques were demonstrated for lower-limb joints during initial and terminal impact-phases, respectively. The stiffness of lower limb joints and the EMGs amplitude of all examined muscles during terminal impact-phase were several times larger than that during initial impact-phase. The absolute symmetry indexes were less than 10% for lower limb joint angles and larger than 10% for the kinetics and muscle activation. The findings demonstrated symmetrical motion for lower limb joints with flexing rapidly at initial impact-phase and maintaining unchanged at terminal impact-phase and asymmetry in joint loading and muscle activation during landing.
- gymnastics,
- simulation,
- lower-limb joints,
- landing impact,
- symmetry
Citation: Chengliang Wu, Weiya Hao, Wei He, Xiaofei Xiao, Xuhong Li, Wei Sun. Biomechanical and neuromuscular strategies on backward somersault landing in artistic gymnastics: A case study[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 5862-5876. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019293

Related Papers:

Abstract

Landing is a crucial factor in gymnastics competitions, but the underlying biomechanical and neuromuscular strategies remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics and neuromuscular strategies of landing for backward somersault. A 19-segment human model was developed and bilateral lower-limb joint loadings were estimated using computer stimulation. Bilateral lower-limb joint angles, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), impulse, joint reaction force, joint torque, power, work, stiffness and electromyogram (EMG) of the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and lateral gastrocnemius were presented during initial (touchdown to peak vGRF) and terminal impact-phases of landing (peak vGRF to vGRF equaling to body weight). The hip, knee, and ankle joints were rapidly flexed (8°, 20°, and 18°, respectively) during initial impact-phase and maintained at around 90°, 120°, and 60°, respectively terminal impact-phase. Flexor and extensor torques were demonstrated for lower-limb joints during initial and terminal impact-phases, respectively. The stiffness of lower limb joints and the EMGs amplitude of all examined muscles during terminal impact-phase were several times larger than that during initial impact-phase. The absolute symmetry indexes were less than 10% for lower limb joint angles and larger than 10% for the kinetics and muscle activation. The findings demonstrated symmetrical motion for lower limb joints with flexing rapidly at initial impact-phase and maintaining unchanged at terminal impact-phase and asymmetry in joint loading and muscle activation during landing.

References

[1]	M. Marinšek and I. Čuk, Landing errors in the men's floor exercise are caused by flight characteristics, Biol. Sport, 27(2010), 123–128.
[2]	FIG, Code of points men's artistic gymnastics. Lyss: Federation International Gymnastics, 2017.
[3]	I. Čuk and M. Marinšek, Landing quality in artistic gymnastics is related to landing symmetry, Biol. Sport, 30(2013), 29–33.
[4]	A. Christoforidou, D. A. Patikas, E. Bassa, et al., Landing from different heights: biomechanical and neuromuscular strategies in trained gymnasts and untrained prepubescent girls, J. Electromyogr. Kines., 32(2017), 1–8.
[5]	A. Slater, A. Campbell, A. Smith, et al., Greater lower limb flexion in gymnastic landings is associated with reduced landing force: a repeated measures study, Sports Biomech., 14(2015), 45–56.
[6]	S. N. Zhang, B. T. Bates and J. S. Dufek, Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings, Med. Sci. Sport Exer., 32(2000), 812–817.
[7]	S. W. Marshall, T. Covassin, R. Dick, et al., Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate women's gymnastics injuries: National collegiate athletic association injury surveillance system, J. Athl. Training, 42(2007), 234–240.
[8]	S. Eagle, C. Connaboy, Q. Mi, et al., Asymmetrical landing patterns combined with heavier body mass increases lower extremity injury risk in special operations forces, J. Sci. Med. Sport, 20(2017), S47–S49.
[9]	M. B. Sabick, R. K. Goetz, S. M. Kuhlman, et al., Symmetry in ground reaction forces during landing in gymnasts and non-gymnasts, Med. Sci. Sport Exer., 38(2006), S23.
[10]	M. J. R. Gittoes, G. Irwin, D. R. Mullineaux, et al., Whole-body and multi-joint kinematic control strategy variability during backward rotating dismounts from beam, J. Sport Sci., 29(2011), 1051–1058.
[11]	A. Kramer, R. Ritzmann, M. Gruber, et al., Leg stiffness can be maintained during reactive hopping despite modified acceleration conditions, J. Biomech., 45(2012), 1816–1822.
[12]	C. T. Farley and D. C. Morgenroth, Leg stiffness primarily depends on ankle stiffness during human hopping, J. Biomech., 32(1999), 267–273.
[13]	M. J. R. Gittoes, G. Irwin and D. G. Kerwin, Kinematic landing strategy transference in backward rotating gymnastic dismounts, J. Appl. Biomech., 29(2013), 235–260.
[14]	J. L. McNitt-Gray, D. M. E. Hester, W. Mathiyakom, et al., Mechanical demand and multijoint control during landing depend on orientation of the body segments relative to the reaction force, J. Biomech., 34(2001), 1471–1482.
[15]	M. J. Decker, M. R. Torry, D. J. Wyland, et al., Gender differences in lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and energy absorption during landing, Clin. Biomech., 18(2003), 662–669.
[16]	M. G. Pandy, Computer modeling and simulation of human movement, Annu. Rev Biomed Eng., 3(2001), 245–273.
[17]	J. S. V. Sint, Color atlas of skeletal landmark definitions, Guidelines for reproducible manual and virtual palpations, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, (2007), 29–175.
[18]	H. Hermens, B. Freriks, R. Merletti, et al., European recommendations for surface electromyography, The Netherlands: Roessingh Research and Development, (1999), pp. 43–45.
[19]	H. Cheng, L. Obergfell and A. Rizer, The development of the GEBOD program, in Proceedings of the 15th Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference, Dayton, Ohio, (1996), 251–254.
[20]	S. Serveto, S. Barré, J. M. Kobus, et al., A three-dimensional model of the boat-oars-rower system using ADAMS and LifeMOD commercial software, PI Mech. Eng. P-J Spo., 224(2010), 75–88.
[21]	X. Xiao, W. Hao, X. Li, et al., The influence of landing mat composition on ankle injury risk during a gymnastic landing: a biomechanical quantification, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 19(2017), 105–113.
[22]	T. D. Collins, S. N. Ghoussayni, D. J. Ewins, et al., A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set, Gait Posture, 30(2009), 173–180.
[23]	D. A. Winter, Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 4th edition, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (2009), 124–286.
[24]	J. H. van Dieen, E. P. Westebring-van der Putten, I. Kingma, et al., Low-level activity of the trunk extensor muscles causes electromyographic manifestations of fatigue in absence of decreased oxygenation, J. Electromyogr. Kines., 19(2009), 398–406.
[25]	P. V. Komi and C. Bosco, Utilization of stored elastic energy in the leg extensor muscles by men and women, Med. Sci. Sport Exer., 10(1987), 261–265.
[26]	M. Ruan and L. Li, Approach run increases preactivation and eccentric phases muscle activity during drop jumps from different drop heights, J. Electromyogr. Kines., 20(2010), 932–938.
[27]	Y. Wang and K. Watanabe, Limb dominance related to the variability and symmetry of the vertical ground reaction force and center of pressure, J. Appl. Biomech., 28(2012), 473–478.
[28]	S. Prassas and K. Gianikellis, Vaulting mechanics, Applied proceedings of the xxth international symposium on biomechanics in sport-Gymnastics, University of Extremadura, Department of Sport Science, Caceres, Spain, 2002.
[29]	Z. Y. Kerr, R. Hayden, M. Barr, et al., Epidemiology of national collegiate athletic association women's gymnastics injuries, 2009–2010 through 2013–2014, J. Athl. Training, 50(2015), 870–878.
[30]	H. Park and D. M. Durand, Motion control of musculoskeletal systems with redundancy, Biol. Cybern., 99(2008), 503–516.
[31]	R. E. A. Van Emmerik, J. Hamill and W. J. McDermott, Variability and coordinative function in human gait, Quest, 57(2005), 102–123.
[32]	E. J. Bradshaw, P. S. Maulder and J. W. Keogh, Biological movement variability during the sprint start: performance enhancement or hindrance? Sports Biomech., 6(2007), 246–260.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)