
The problem of bivariate polynomial interpolation using Newton-type bases is examined, leading to the application of a generalized Kronecker matrix product. Algorithms for computing the coefficients of the interpolating polynomial are presented, along with conditions that ensure relative errors of the order of machine precision. A generalization of the classical recursion formula of divided differences in two dimensions is proposed for grids that generalize the standard rectangular layout. Numerical experiments demonstrate the high accuracy achieved by the proposed approach.
Citation: Yasmina Khiar, Esmeralda Mainar, Eduardo Royo-Amondarain, Beatriz Rubio. High relative accuracy for a Newton form of bivariate interpolation problems[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3836-3847. doi: 10.3934/math.2025178
[1] | Heba S. Mohammed, Zubair Ahmad, Alanazi Talal Abdulrahman, Saima K. Khosa, E. H. Hafez, M. M. Abd El-Raouf, Marwa M. Mohie El-Din . Statistical modelling for Bladder cancer disease using the NLT-W distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9262-9276. doi: 10.3934/math.2021538 |
[2] | M. Nagy, H. M. Barakat, M. A. Alawady, I. A. Husseiny, A. F. Alrasheedi, T. S. Taher, A. H. Mansi, M. O. Mohamed . Inference and other aspects for $ q- $Weibull distribution via generalized order statistics with applications to medical datasets. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8311-8338. doi: 10.3934/math.2024404 |
[3] | Najwan Alsadat, Mahmoud Abu-Moussa, Ali Sharawy . On the study of the recurrence relations and characterizations based on progressive first-failure censoring. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 481-494. doi: 10.3934/math.2024026 |
[4] | Ekramy A. Hussein, Hassan M. Aljohani, Ahmed Z. Afify . The extended Weibull–Fréchet distribution: properties, inference, and applications in medicine and engineering. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 225-246. doi: 10.3934/math.2022014 |
[5] | Nora Nader, Dina A. Ramadan, Hanan Haj Ahmad, M. A. El-Damcese, B. S. El-Desouky . Optimizing analgesic pain relief time analysis through Bayesian and non-Bayesian approaches to new right truncated Fréchet-inverted Weibull distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 31217-31245. doi: 10.3934/math.20231598 |
[6] | Ayed. R. A. Alanzi, M. Qaisar Rafique, M. H. Tahir, Farrukh Jamal, M. Adnan Hussain, Waqas Sami . A novel Muth generalized family of distributions: Properties and applications to quality control. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6559-6580. doi: 10.3934/math.2023331 |
[7] | Aisha Fayomi, Ehab M. Almetwally, Maha E. Qura . A novel bivariate Lomax-G family of distributions: Properties, inference, and applications to environmental, medical, and computer science data. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17539-17584. doi: 10.3934/math.2023896 |
[8] | Monthira Duangsaphon, Sukit Sokampang, Kannat Na Bangchang . Bayesian estimation for median discrete Weibull regression model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 270-288. doi: 10.3934/math.2024016 |
[9] | Mohammed Albassam, Muhammad Ahsan-ul-Haq, Muhammad Aslam . Weibull distribution under indeterminacy with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10745-10757. doi: 10.3934/math.2023545 |
[10] | Refah Alotaibi, Mazen Nassar, Zareen A. Khan, Ahmed Elshahhat . Analysis of Weibull progressively first-failure censored data with beta-binomial removals. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24109-24142. doi: 10.3934/math.20241172 |
The problem of bivariate polynomial interpolation using Newton-type bases is examined, leading to the application of a generalized Kronecker matrix product. Algorithms for computing the coefficients of the interpolating polynomial are presented, along with conditions that ensure relative errors of the order of machine precision. A generalization of the classical recursion formula of divided differences in two dimensions is proposed for grids that generalize the standard rectangular layout. Numerical experiments demonstrate the high accuracy achieved by the proposed approach.
The Weibull distribution is one of the most important lifetime model. It has many applications in statistics, bioscience, chemistry, engineering, economics and finance. The Exponential and Rayleigh, among other, distributions are specials. It is suitable for modeling data with hazard functions of different forms. It is proper in the cases where an item consists of multiple components and each component has an identical failure time distribution and the item fails when the weakest part fails [15]. A random variable X is said to have Weibull distribution if its cdf and pdf are respectively defined by
G(x)=1−exp(−δxφ), | (1.1) |
g(x)=δφxφ−1exp(−δxφ), | (1.2) |
where δ>0 andφ>0 are respectively the scale and shape parameters for x > 0. Because of the widespread study and applications of the Weibull distribution, there is a need for new generalizations. Several generalizations distributions of Eq (1.1) have been studied in the literature. Kumaraswamy generalized power Weibull distribution has been discussed by Selim and Badar [23]. A new three-parameter lifetime model, the Truncated Weibull Lomax (TWL) distribution has been proposed by Al-marzoki and Al-said [3]. The exponentiated power generalized Weibull distribution has been investigated by Pena-ramirez et al. [17]. A recurrence relations for the single and product moments of order statistics for power generalized Weibull (PGW) distribution have been established by Kumar and Dey [14]. Using these recurrence relations, they obtained the means, variances and covariances of all order statistics for different sample sizes in an efficient manner. Some useful generalizations of the standard Weibull distribution have been introduced by Ramos et al. [18] to describe the lifetime of two important components of sugarcane harvesting machines. The mathematical background of the considered model was discussed and different discrimination procedures were used to obtain the best fit for each component. The inverse Weibull generated (IW-G) family with two extra positive parameters was generated from inverse Weibull random variable [10]. Four special models for the new family, some mathematical properties, the estimation of the model parameters and an applications to real data were offered. A new two-parameter model, the inverse weighted Lindley (IWL) distribution with upside-down bathtub hazard rate was introduced by Ramos et al. [19]. A detailed account of useful mathematical properties of the new distribution, a numerical simulation and an application using a real data set were offered. The alpha power inverse Weibull (APIW) distribution was proposed by Basheer [6]. He explored various useful properties along with the estimation of the APIW parameters and an application of the new model to a real data representing the waiting time before customer service in the bank was provided. Moreover, Ramos et al. [20] introduced an extended Poisson family of life distribution via a new approach to generate flexible parametric families of distributions. They discussed several mathematical properties and inferential procedures of the proposed model. The applicability of considered model to real situation was illustrated by an important data set. Further, the exponentiated power generalized Weibull power series (EPGWPS) family of distributions, has been obtained by compounding the exponentiated power generalized Weibull and power series distributions by Aldahlan et al. [2]. Bayesian inferences for the inverse generalized gamma (IGG) distribution parameters under non-informative priors, namely, the Jeffreys prior and the reference prior was discussed by Ramos et al. [21], and the potentiality of the IGG model was analysed by employing real environmental data. The GIKum and its distribution function [12], is given by
F(x)=[1−(1+xγ)−α]β, | (1.3) |
where x>0 and α>0,β>0,γ>0 are shape parameters. Let s(t) be the pdf of a random variable T ∈[a,b], where −∞≤a<b<∞ and consider ξ[G(x)] be a function of the cdf of a random variable X, the T−X family of distributions [4], is defined as
F(x)=∫ξ[G(x)]as(t)dt, | (1.4) |
assuming the following conditions are satisfied.
(1)ξ[G(x)]∈[a,b].
(2)ξ[G(x)] is differentiable and monotonically non decreasing function.
(3)ξ[G(x)]→a, as x→−∞ and ξ[G(x)]→b, as x→∞.
Our motivation here is to introduce a new more flexible model so called the extended generalized inverted Kumaraswamy Weibull (EGIKw-Weibull) distribution. It is rarly to get closed forms of statistical quntities of distributions, here we derive closed formes for most statistical quantities for the new model, including moments, moment generating function, reliability function, Rényi Entropy etc. The new model shows higher flexibility as compared to other commonly used standard distributions. Its hazard function shows different shapes that makes it a preferable choice for modeling the monotonic and non-monotonic hazard behaviors which are more likely to be encountered in practical situations like, human mortality, reliability analysis and biomedical applications. The remaining of this paper is organized as follows: the formation of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution and its reliability measures are provided in section 2; the density and distribution functions of EGIKw-Weibull distribution and some mathematical properties of the proposed model are derived in section 3; parameters are estimated using the maximum likelihood method (MLE) method in section 4; Monte Carlo simulation is employed in section 5, to investigate the model; two real applications are given in section 6 to demonstrate the properties; finally, the concluding remarks are given in section 7.
Using G(x,ϑ) and g(x,ϑ) from Eq (1.1) and Eq (1.2), in Eq (1.4), the cdf of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution is given by
FEGIKw−W(x)=αβγ∫[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ0tγ−1(1+tγ)−α−1[1−(1+tγ)−α]β−1dt=[1−{1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)γ}−α]β, | (2.1) |
where x≥0, α>0, β>0, γ>0 and λ>0 are shape parameters. For φ=1 we obtain the EGIKw-Exponential distribution. The corresponding pdf is given by
fEGIKw−W(x)=αβγλδφxφ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]λγ−1×[1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ]−γ−1×{1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)γ}−α−1×[1−{1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)γ}−α]β−1. | (2.2) |
This extension gives a highly flexible life distribution which admits different degrees of kurtosis and asymmetry. Figure 1(a) shows the unimodality and positivity skewed. The graphical representation of the cdf of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution is given in Figure 1(b). The plot at other parametric values produces similar shapes. In insurance problems and biomedical applications, it is often general to use the survival function to depict the distribution of survival time. Let the random variable X denotes the survival time and FX(x) be the cdf or the failure probability by time x, then the survival function is given by
Sx(x)=P(X>x)=1−Fx(x). |
The survival function is the probability of survival beyond time x. The survival function of X ∼ EGIKw-Weibull is given by
Sx(x)=1−[1−{1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)γ}−α]β. | (2.3) |
For brevity purpose, a graphical representation of the survival function of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution at selected parameter values is shown in Figure 2(a). The hazard rate function commonly used in lifetime modeling because it gives the amount of risk to fail. The hazard rate for EGIKw-Weibull is given as
h(x,ϕ)=αβγλδφxφ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]λγ−1×[1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ]−γ−1×{1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)γ}−α−1×[1−{1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)γ}−α]β−1×{1−[1−{1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)γ}−α]β}−1, | (2.4) |
where x>0 and ϕ=α,β,γ,λ,δ,φ. The EGIKw-Weibull model shows versatility and high flexibility. Its hazard rate function follows an upside down bathtub shape over time, when α<β<γ<λ and δ>φ. In this situation, hazard rate decreases as proportion parameters increase. The hazard rate offers a J-shaped trend over time, when α>β>γ>λ and δ>φ. In this scenario, the hazard rate increases as proportion parameters increase. Further, the hazard rate exhibits an exponential decreasing trend with increase in time, when α⩾β⩾γ⩾λ and δ≶φ. Similarly, the hazard rate function of the considered model offers various shapes, such as monotonically increasing, bathtub shape, constant and increasing-decreasing almost linearly, monotonically decreasing, constant and exponential increasing, and upside down bathtub shapes, for different parametric values. These attractive features render the EGIKw-Weibull distribution suitable for modeling the monotonic and non-monotonic hazard behaviors which are more likely to be encountered in practical situations like, human mortality, reliability analysis and biomedical applications thus enhancing its adaptability to fit diverse lifetime data, Figure 2(b). The quantile function is given by
Q(u)=xu=F−1(u)=[−1δlog{1−(1+((1−u1β)−1α−1)−1γ)−1λ}]1φ, | (2.5) |
the random numbers from EGIKw-Weibull distribution can be simulated using the expression Eq (2.5), where U ∼ Uniform (0,1). In particular, the median of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution can be derived by substituting u=0.5 in Eq (2.5), we have
Median=[−1δlog{1−(1+((1−0.51β)−1α−1)−1γ)−1λ}]1φ. |
Note that the EGIKw-Weibull distribution of models outlined above reduces to GIKw-Weibull distribution for γ=1 and for γ=1,λ=1 we obtain the exponentinated generalized Weibull distribution. Hence the parameter γ of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution offers more flexibility to the extremes for the pdf curves. That's why the new distribution becomes more appropriate for analyzing data sets that exhibit heavy-tail.
Here properties of EGIKw-Weibull distribution are discussed.
By using the binomial expansions in Eq (2.1), we obtain the linear combination for EGIKw-Weibull cdf (for γ>0 integer) as
F(x)=∞∑i,j,k=0wi,j,k[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ(γj+k), | (3.1) |
where wi,j,k=(−1)i+j(βi)(αi+j−1j)(γj+k−1k). Otherwise, for γ>0 real non-integer, we have
F(x)=∞∑r=0zr[1−exp(−δxφ)]r, | (3.2) |
where the coefficient zr=∑∞i,j,k=0∑∞l=r(−1)l+r(λ(γj+k)l)(lr)wi,j,k is sum of constants. Moreover the EGIKw-Weibull cdf can be expressed in terms of Weibull Exponential-G cdf, s as
F(x)=∞∑r=0zrVr(x), | (3.3) |
where Vr(x)=[1−exp(−δxφ)]r is the Weibull Exponential-G cdf with power parameter r. The corresponding expansions for the EGIKw-Weibull density fucntion are respectively obtained by differentiation of Eq (3.1) for γ>0 integer and of Eq (3.2) and Eq (3.3) for γ>0 real non-integer, as
f(x)=δφxφ−1exp(−δxφ)∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,k[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ(γj+k)−1, | (3.4) |
f(x)=δφxφ−1exp(−δxφ)∞∑r=0˘zr[1−exp(−δxφ)]r, | (3.5) |
f(x)=∞∑r=0′′zrvr+1(x), | (3.6) |
where ′′wi,j,k=λ(γj+k)wi,j,k,˘zr=(r+1)zr+1,′′zr=zr+1 forr=0,1,2,..., and vr+1(x)=(r+1)δφxφ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]r is the Weibull Exponential-G density with parameter (r+1).
For p and q non-negative integers, the ordinary moments are defined by
τp,q=E[XpG(X)q]=∫xpG(x)qg(x)dx=δφ∫∞0xp+φ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]qdx=1δpφq∑l=0(ql)(−)lΓ(pφ+1)(l+1)pφ+1. | (3.7) |
The pth ordinary moment for an integer for γ>0 can be expressed as
μ′p=E(Xp)=∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,kτp,λ(γj+k)−1, | (3.8) |
where ′′wi,j,k, is defined in Eq (3.4) and τp,λ(γj+k)−1, is the (p,λ(γj+k)−1)th PWM of Weibull distribution given in Eq (3.7). For a non-integer γ>0, we can write
μ′p=E(Xp)=∞∑r=0˘zrτp,r, | (3.9) |
where ˘zr, is defined in Eq (3.5) and τp,r, is the (p,r)th PWM of Weibull distribution. Moreover, we can also provide the moments of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution in terms of Weibull Exponential-G moments. Let Xr+1 has Weibull Exponential-G distribution with cdf, Vr+1(x)=[1−exp(−δxφ)]r and pdf, vr+1(x)=(r+1)δxφ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]r with power parameter (r+1), the pth ordinary moment of Weibull Exponential-G distribution (for γ>0 non-integer) is given as
E(Xpr+1)=∫∞0xpvr+1(x)dx. |
Hence the pth moment of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution can be expressed in terms of infinite weighted sum of Weibull Exponential-G moments as
μ′p=∞∑r=0′′zr∫∞0xpvr+1(x)dx, | (3.10) |
where ′′zr, is defined in Eq (3.6).
The moment generating function (MGF) for an integer γ>0, can be derived using Eq (3.4) as
M(t)=δ∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,k∫∞0xφ−1exp(tx)exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ(γj+k)−1dx,=∞∑i,j,k,l,u=0′′wi,j,k,l,u∫∞0xφ(u+1)−1exp(tx)dx,=∞∑i,j,k,l,u=0′′wi,j,k,l,uΓ(φ(u+1))(−t)φ(u+1), | (3.11) |
where ′′wi,j,k,l,u=wi,j,k(λ(γj+k)−1l)δu+1(l+1)uu!(−1)l+u. For a non-integer γ>0 an alternative representation for M(t) can be derived from Eq (3.5) as
M(t)=∞∑r=0˘zr∫exp(tx)g(x)G(x)rdx,=δ∞∑r=0˘zr∫∞0xφ−1exp(tx)exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]rdx,=∞∑r,u=0r∑l=0˘zr(rl)δu+1(l+1)uu!(−1)l+uΓ(φ(u+1))(−t)φ(u+1). | (3.12) |
Another representation for M(t) in terms of Weibull Exponential-G MGF, for a non-integer γ>0 is obtained from Eq (3.6) as
M(t)=∞∑r=0′′zr∫∞0exp(tx)vr+1(t)dx,=∞∑r=0′′zrMr+1(t), | (3.13) |
where Mr+1(t) is the mgf of X∼Weibull Exponential-G random variable with power parameter (r+1).
Let X be a EGIKw-Weibull random variable with mean μ =E(X) and median M. The mean deviation about the mean δμ(X) and about the median δM(X) are respectively defined by
δμ(X)=E(|X−μ′1|)=2μ′1F(μ′1)−2T(μ′1), | (3.14) |
δM(X)=E(|X−M|)=μ′1−2T(M), | (3.15) |
where T(z)= δφ∫z0xφexp(−δxφ)dx.=δ−1/φ⋎(1/φ+1,δzφ) is first GIKw-Weibull incomplete moment with ⋎(.,.) the incomplete gamma function, μ′1 =E(X) is the first ordinary moment, M=Median(X) denotes the median determined from the Eq (2.5) for u=1/2, and F(μ′1) comes from Eq (2.1). Using the quantile function, two additional forms for T(x) are obtained. Firstly, when γ>0 an integer,
T(z)=∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,k∫[1−exp(−δzφ)]0uλ(γj+k)−1Q(u)du, |
where Q(u) is the EGIKw-Weibull quantile functin given in Eq (2.5) and the second representation for γ>0 is derived as
T(z)=∞∑r=0˘zr∫[1−exp(−δzφ)]0urQ(u)du. |
Alternatively using EGIKw-Weibull density Eq (3.6), in terms of Exponential-G distribution we obtain,
T(z)=∞∑r=0′′zr∫z0xvr+1(x)dx, |
where ′′wi,j,k,˘zr,′′zr are given in Eqs (3.4–3.6).
The Rényi [22], is one of the most popular measures of entropy and for EGIKw-Weibull distribution, it is defined as
Iζ(x)=11−ζlog((αβγλφδ)ζ∞∑i,j,k=0˜wi,j,k∫∞0[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ(γj+k)+ζ(γλ−1)xζ(φ−1)exp(−ζδxφ)dx),=11−ζlog((αβγλφδ)ζ∞∑i,j,k=0˜wi,j,k,t∫∞0xζ(φ−1)exp(−δxφ(ζ+t))dx),=11−ζlog((αβγλφδ)ζ∞∑i,j,k=0˜wi,j,k,tΓ(ζ−ζ−1φ)φ[δ(ζ+t)](ζ−ζ−1φ)), | (3.16) |
where ˜wi,j,k,t=(−1)i+j+t(ζ(β−1)i)(αi+ζ(α+1)+j−1j)(γj+ζ(γ+1)+k−1k)(λ(γj+k)+ζ(γλ−1)t).
Let X1 be a random variable having EGIKw-Weibull distribution with pdf, f1(x) given in Eq (2.2) with parameters α1,β1,γ1,λ1,δ,φ and X2 be a random variable having the cdf F2(x) given in Eq (2.1) with parameters α2,β2,γ2,λ2,δ,φ. Assuming X1 and X2 to be independent, the reliability function R is defined by
R=P(Y<X)=∫f1(x)F2(x)dx=α1β1γ1λ1φδ∫∞0xφ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]γ1λ1−1×[1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1]−γ1−1×[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ11−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1)γ1]−α1−1×[1−[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ11−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1)γ1]−α1]β1−1×[1−[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ21−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ2)γ2]−α2]β2dx. | (3.17) |
Alternatively, with the change of variable x=Q1(u), where Q1(u) denotes the EGIKw-Weibull quantile function Eq (2.5) corresponding to f1(x), we have
R=∫10F2(Q1(u))du=∫10{1−[1+{[1+{(1−u1β1)−1α1−1}−1γ1]λ2λ1−1}−γ2]−α2}β2du. | (3.18) |
In particular, from this expression we see that R does not depend on the baseline distribution characterized by the cdf [1−exp(−δxφ)]. Various forms of R for γ1,γ2>0 integer, by using linear expression can be obtained as
f1(x)=φδxφ−1exp(−δxφ)∞∑t,u,v=0′′wt,u,v[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1(γ1u+v)−1,F2(x)=∞∑i,j,k=0ˉwi,j,k[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ2(γ2j+k), |
where ′′wt,u,v=λ1(γ1u+v)(−1)t+u(β1t)(α1t+u−1u)(γ1u+v−1v) and ˉwi,j,k=(−1)i+j (β2i)(α2i+j−1j)(γ2j+k−1k). Thus, we have
R=φ δ∞∑i,j,k,t,u,v=0ˉwi,j,k′′wt,u,v∫∞0xφ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ1(γ1u+v)+λ2(γ2j+k)−1dx=∞∑i,j,k,t,u,v=0ˉwi,j,k′′wt,u,vλ1(γ1u+v)+λ2(γ2j+k). | (3.19) |
Similar expressions can be obtained for the case γ1,γ2>0 non-integers.
Various expressions for EGIKw-Weibull Lorenz L(p) and Bonferroni B(p) curves for γ>0 integer, are given as
L(p)=EX≤xE(X)=1E(X)∫x0tf(t)dt=δφμ∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,k∫x0tφexp(−δtφ)[1−exp(−δtφ)]λ(γj+k)−1dt=δφμ∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,k(λ(γj+k)−1l)(−1)l∫x0tφexp(−δtφ(l+1))dt=δμ∞∑i,j,k,l=0′′wi,j,k(λ(γj+k)−1l)(−1)l⋎(1/φ+1,δ(l+1)xφ)[δ(l+1)]1/φ+1. | (3.20) |
Equivalently based upon EGIKw-Weibull quantile function Eq (2.5) we have
L(p)=1μ∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,k∫[1−exp(−δtφ)]0uλ(γj+k)−1Q(u)du. |
Alternatively using the expression given in Eq (3.6) in terms of Exponential-G density vr(t) we have
L(p)=1μ∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,kλ(γj+k)∫x0tvλ(γj+k)(t)dt. |
The corresponding expressions for the Bonferroni Curve are given by
B(p)=EX≤xF(X)E(X)=L(X)F(X)=1F(X)E(X)∫x0tf(t)dt | (3.21) |
=δμF(x)∞∑i,j,k,l=0′′wi,j,k(λ(γj+k)−1l)(−1)l⋎(1/φ+1,δ(l+1)xφ)[δ(l+1)]1/φ+1.andB(p)=1μF(X)∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,k∫G(x)0uλ(γj+k)−1Q(u)du=1μF(X)∞∑i,j,k=0′′wi,j,kλ(γj+k)∫x0tvλ(γj+k)(t)dt, | (3.22) |
where ⋎(.,.) is the upper incomplete gamma function. Similar expressions can be obtained for the case of γ>0 non-integer using Eq (3.5).
The residual life plays an important role in life testing situations and reliability theory. The nth moment of the residual life is defined as
mn(t)=E[(X−t)n/X>t]=1R(t)∫∞t(x−t)nf(x)dx=1R(t)n∑a=0(na)(−t)n−a∫∞txaf(x)dx. | (3.23) |
For γ>0 integer, using pdf Eq (3.4) we have
mn(t)=δφS(t)∞∑i,j,k=0n∑a=0′′wi,j,k(na)(−t)n−a×∫∞txa+φ−1exp(−δxφ)[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ(γj+k)−1dx=δφS(t)∞∑i,j,k,l=0n∑a=0′′wi,j,k,l(na)(−t)n−a∫∞txa+φ−1exp(−δxφ(l+1))dx=δS(t)∞∑i,j,k,l=0n∑a=0′′wi,j,k,l(na)(−t)n−aΓ(a/φ+1,δ(l+1)tφ)[δ(l+1)]a/φ+1, | (3.24) |
where ′′wi,j,k,l=′′wi,j,k(λ(γj+k)−1l)(−1)l and Γ(.,.) is lower incomplete gamma function, similarly using the EGIKw-Weibull quantile function for γ>0 non-integer, we have
mn(t)=1S(t)∞∑r=0n∑a=0˘zr(na)(−t)n−a∫1[1−exp(−δtφ)]urQ(u)adu. | (3.25) |
An alternative representation can be derived from Weibull Exponential-G distribution, as
mn(t)=1S(t)∞∑r=0n∑a=0′′zr(na)(−t)n−a∫∞txavr+1(x)dx, | (3.26) |
where S(x)=1−F(x) is the EGIKw-Weibull survival function and vr+1 is the Weibull Exponential-G density function as given in Eq (3.6).
Let X1,X2,...,Xn be a random sample of size n from the EGIKw-Weibull distribution and X(1),X(2),...,X(n) are the corresponding order statistics, then the pdf of ith order statistic can be obtained as
fi:n(x)=f(x)B(i,n−i+1)F(x)i−1[1−F(x)]n−i=f(x)B(i,n−i+1)n−i∑h=0(−1)h(n−i h)F(x)h+i−1, | (3.27) |
where B(.,.) is the beta function and F(x) is the EGIKw-Weibull cdf. Replacing Eq (3.2) in above expression, we have
F(x)h+i−1=[∞∑t=0zt[1−exp(−δtφ)]t]h+i−1=∞∑t=0ct,h+i−1[1−exp(−δtφ)]t, | (3.28) |
where c0,h+i−1=(z0)h+i−1, ct,h+i−1=(tz0)−1∑tm=1[m(h+i)−t]zmct−m,h+i−1. Using Eq (3.28) in Eq (3.27), with f(x) given in Eq (3.4) for γ>0 integer, and with f(x) Eq (3.5) for γ>0 non-integer, we respectively obtain
fi:n(x)=δφtφ−1exp(−δtφ)B(i,n−i+1)∞∑l,j,k,t=0n−i∑h=0′′wl,j,kct,h+i−1(−1)h(n−i h)[1−exp(−δtφ)]−(λ(γj+k)+t−1),andfi:n(x)=δφtφ−1exp(−δtφ)B(i,n−i+1)∞∑r,t=0n−i∑h=0˘zrct,h+i−1(−1)h(n−i h)[1−exp(−δtφ)]r+t. | (3.29) |
The corresponding expressions for moments, the mgf and other properties of the EGIKw-Weibull order statistics can be obtained likewise.
In this section, we employ the method of MLE to estimate the unknown parameters of EGIKw-Weibull distribution. We consider independent random variables X1,X2...,Xn, from an EGIKw-Weibull distribution with parameter vector Θ=(α,β,γ,λ,φ,δ)′. The log-likelihood l(Θ) = logL(Θ) for the model parameters obtained from Eq (2.2) is
l(Θ)=nlog(αβγλδφ)+(φ−1)n∑i=1logx−δn∑i=1xφ−(λ+1)×n∑i=1log[1−exp(−δxφ)]−(γ+1)×n∑i=1log[[1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1]−(α+1)×n∑i=1log[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ]+(β−1)×n∑i=1log[1−[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ]−α]. | (4.1) |
The components of score vector U=(Uα,Uβ,Uγ,Uλ,Uφ)′ are given by
Uα=nα−n∑i=1log[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ]+(β−1)×n∑i=1log[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ][1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ]α−1,Uβ=nβ+n∑i=1log[1−[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ]−α],Uγ=nγ−n∑i=1log([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)+(α+1)n∑i=1log([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ−(β−1)α×n∑i=1log([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ]−1[(1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ)α−1], |
Uλ=nλ−n∑i=1log[1−exp(−δxφ)]−(γ+1)n∑i=1log[1−exp(−δxφ)]([1−exp(−δxφ)]λ−1)−(α+1)γn∑i=1log[1−exp(−δxφ)](1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ]+n∑i=1log[1−exp(−δxφ)][1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ]α−1×αγ(β−1)(1−[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ)[1+([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ],Uδ=nδ−n∑i=1xφ−(λ+1)n∑i=1xφexp(δxφ)−1−λ(γ+1)×n∑i=1xφ[[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ−1][exp(δxφ)−1]+γλ(α+1)×n∑i=1xφ[([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ+1]−1[[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ−1][exp(δxφ)−1]−αγλ(β−1)×n∑i=1xφ[exp(δxφ)−1]−1[(([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ+1)α−1]−1[([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ+1][[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ−1], |
Uφ=nφ+n∑i=1logx−δn∑i=1xφlogx−δ(λ+1)n∑i=1xφlogxexp(δxφ)−1−δλ(γ+1)×n∑i=1xφlogx[[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ−1][exp(δxφ)−1]+δγλ(α+1)×n∑i=1xφlogx[([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ+1]−1[[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ−1][exp(δxφ)−1]−αδγλ(β−1)×n∑i=1xφlogx[(([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)−γ+1)α−1]−1[([1−exp(−δxφ)]−λ−1)γ+1][[1−exp(−δxφ)]λ−1][exp(δxφ)−1]. |
Setting these equations to zero and solving them simultaneously yields the MLEs of the GKw-E parameters. Since there are no close form for these MLEs, a numerical solution to these equations can be determined by using a standard statistical software.
In this section, an extensive numerical investigation is carried out to examine the performance of MLEs for EGIKw-Weibull model. The performance of estimators is evaluated through their average bias (AB) and root mean square errors (RMSE) for different sample sizes. The quantile function is given in Eq (2.5) is used to generate random samples from the EGIKw-Weibull distribution. The simulations experiment is repeated for N=2,000 times, for each set of parameters with sample sizes n=20,50,100 and 120 and assumed parametric values I:(α=0.8,β=2.0,γ=1.5,λ=3.0,δ=2.5,φ=1.25), II:(α=2.0,β=1.5,γ=1.2,λ=2.5,δ=2.2,φ=1.75), III:(α=1.4,β=0.5,γ=0.75,λ=2.5,δ=0.7,φ=3.5) and IV:(α=0.2,β=0.85,γ=0.15,λ=2.25,δ=0.3,φ=1.5). The AB and RMSE values of the parameters α,β,γ,λ,δ and φ for different sample sizes are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. From the results of these Tables, it is clear that the AB and RMSE for the estimators of the parameters are showing decreasing pattern as the sample size increases. The results indicate that the method of MLE performs quite well in estimating the model parameters of the proposed distribution.
![]() |
![]() |
This section provides two real applications to show how the proposed distribution can be applied in practice. The importance and potentiality of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution are examined and compared with the other fitted models namely the exponentiated Kumaraswamy-Weibull (ExKu-weibuII) distribution [9], generalized Inverted Kumaraswamy Weibull (GIKw-Weibull) distribution [11], the inverse Weibull Weibull (IW-weibuII) distribution [10], the Kumaraswamy-Weibull (Ku-weibuII) distribution [7], Type II Half Logistic Weibull (TyIIKwHL-weibuII) distribution [11], exponentiated Weibull (Ex-weibuII) distribution [16], generalized inverse Weibull distribution[8] (GIWD) and the well known Weibull distribution. To do so, we consider two real applications: first, the life of fatigue fracture of Kevlar data [1], and secondly, the gauge lengths data [13].
The first data set has 76 observations and represents the life of fatigue fracture of Kevlar 373/epoxy subjected to constant pressure at 90 percent stress level until all had failed. Among other applications, the data set has been used to assess the superiority of the Transmuted Gompertz distribution over the Gompertz distribution [1].
The second data set consists of 63 observations and represents the gauge lengths of 10 mm as reported in [13]. For each model, we estimate the parameters by using the method of MLE and adopt the maximum value of log(likelihood) evaluated at MLEs (−l), minimum value of the Cram'er-vonMises (W∗) statistics, Anderson-Darling (A∗) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test statistics for model comparison purposes. In general, the smaller the values of these statistics, the better the fit to the data. The TTT transformation curves of these data sets are depicted in Figure 3(a) and Figure 3(b) respectively, which suggest an increasing frf for both data sets and therefore, indicate that the proposed model is suitable for fitting these data [5]. Furthermore, the key descriptive statistics of the data set 1 are listed in Table 3. Table 4 gives the MLEs of parameters with there corresponding standard errors in parenthesis. To compare goodness-of-fit of considered models, the computed goodness-of-fit measures are provided in Table 5. The estimated pdf, cdf, PP-plots and QQ-plots of the various models are respectively plotted in Figures 4–7, for the first data set. The key descriptive statistics, estimates of the parameters as well as the values of the goodness of fit statistics for data set 2 are listed in Tables 6–8. The estimated pdf, cdf, PP-plots and QQ-plots of the different models are plotted in Figures 8–11 for the second data set. We note that the EGIKw-Weibull distribution provides the best fit for both data sets. Hence, the proposed six parameter Weibull distribution is superior to other well known models in term of empirical model fitting to real data.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
There has been a growing interest among statisticians and applied researchers in constructing flexible lifetime models to improve the modeling of survival data. As a result, significant progress has been made towards the generalization of the traditional Weibull model. In this article, a new six parameter Weibull extension named the EGIKw-Weibull distribution is proposed. The EGIKw-Weibull model is motivated by the fact that the generalization provides more flexibility to analyze positive real-life data. Graphs of the pdf, cdf, hrf and cumulative hrf of the distribution are presented. From Figure 1(a), it can be seen that the shape of the distribution is extremely left skewed, and Figure 2(b) shows that the hazard rate function of the EGIKw-Weibull distribution exhibits various shapes. That support using it in modeling the monotonic and non-monotonic hazard behaviors which are more likely to be encountered in practical situations like, human mortality, reliability analysis and biomedical applications. Various properties of the new model have been derived and explicit expressions for order statistics have been provided that makes analysis of data available. Parameter estimation is done by the method of MLE. Finally, a Monte Carlo Simulation study has been provided to assess the performance of the proposed model. The practical importance of the proposed distribution is demonstrated using two real applications, it is found that the EGIKw-Weibull model is well fitted as compared to its competing models, Tables 4, 5, 7 and 8.
The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous referees for their suggestions that improve the first edition of the paper.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
L. Bos, S. De Marchi, S. Waldron, On the Vandermonde determinant of Padua-like points, Dolomites Research Notes Approx., 2 (2009), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-drna-2009-1-1 doi: 10.14658/pupj-drna-2009-1-1
![]() |
[2] |
M. Caliari, S. De Marchi, M. Vianello, Bivariate polynomial interpolation on the square at new nodal sets, Appl. Math. Comput., 165 (2005), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.07.001
![]() |
[3] |
J. Delgado, H. Orera, J. M. Peña, Accurate computations with Laguerre matrices, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 26 (2019), e2217. https://doi.org/10.1002/nla.2217 doi: 10.1002/nla.2217
![]() |
[4] |
F. Dell'Accio, F. Di Tommaso, N. Siar, On the numerical computation of bivariate Lagrange polynomials, Appl. Math. Lett., 112 (2021), 106845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106845 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106845
![]() |
[5] |
F. Dell'Accio, F. Marcellán, F. Nudo, An extension of a mixed interpolation–regression method using zeros of orthogonal polynomials, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 450 (2024), 116010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2024.116010 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2024.116010
![]() |
[6] |
J. Demmel, Accurate singular value decompositions of structured matrices, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 21 (2000), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479897328716 doi: 10.1137/S0895479897328716
![]() |
[7] |
J. Demmel, P. Koev, The accurate and efficient solution of a totally positive generalized Vandermonde linear system, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 27 (2005), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479804440335 doi: 10.1137/S0895479804440335
![]() |
[8] |
S. Erol, B. Erol, A comparative assessment of different interpolation algorithms for prediction of gnss/levelling geoid surface using scattered control data, Measurement, 173 (2021), 108623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108623 doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108623
![]() |
[9] |
M. Fan, X. Zuo, B. Zhou, Parallel computing method of commonly used interpolation algorithms for remote sensing images, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 17 (2024), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2023.3329018 doi: 10.1109/jstars.2023.3329018
![]() |
[10] |
M. S. Floater, Polynomial interpolation on interlacing rectangular grids, J. Approx. Theory, 222 (2017), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jat.2017.06.002. doi: 10.1016/j.jat.2017.06.002
![]() |
[11] |
M. Gasca, J. J. Martínez, On the solvability of bivariate Hermite-Birkhoff interpolation problems, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 32 (1990), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(90)90418-y doi: 10.1016/0377-0427(90)90418-y
![]() |
[12] |
M. Gasca, T. Sauer, Polynomial interpolation in several variables, Adv. Comput. Math., 12 (2000), 377–410. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018981505752 doi: 10.1023/a:1018981505752
![]() |
[13] | E. Isaacson, H. B. Keller, Analysis of numerical methods, Courier Corporation, 2012. |
[14] |
Y. Khiar, E. Mainar, E. Royo-Amondarain, B. Rubio, On the accurate computation of the Newton form of the Lagrange interpolant, Numer. Algor., 98 (2025), 1553–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-024-01843-7 doi: 10.1007/s11075-024-01843-7
![]() |
[15] | P. Koev, TNTool software package for performing virtually all matrix computations with nonsingular totally nonnegative matrices to high relative accuracy. Available from: https://sites.google.com/sjsu.edu/plamenkoev/home/software/tntool. |
[16] |
P. Koev, Accurate computations with totally nonnegative matrices, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 29 (2007), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1137/04061903x doi: 10.1137/04061903x
![]() |
[17] |
E. Mainar, J. M. Peña, B. Rubio, Accurate and efficient computations with Wronskian matrices of Bernstein and related bases, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 29 (2022), e2423. https://doi.org/10.1002/nla.2423 doi: 10.1002/nla.2423
![]() |
[18] |
E. Mainar, J. M. Peña, B. Rubio, Accurate computations with matrices related to bases {tieλt}, Adv. Comput. Math., 48 (2022), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-022-09954-2 doi: 10.1007/s10444-022-09954-2
![]() |
[19] |
A. Marco, J. J. Martínez, Accurate computations with totally positive Bernstein-Vandermonde matrices, Electron. J. Linear Algebra, 26 (2013), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.13001/1081-3810.1658 doi: 10.13001/1081-3810.1658
![]() |
[20] |
A. Marco, J. J. Martínez, R. Viaña, Accurate polynomial interpolation by using the Bernstein basis, Numer. Algor., 75 (2017), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-016-0215-7 doi: 10.1007/s11075-016-0215-7
![]() |
[21] |
J. J. Martínez, A generalized Kronecker product and linear systems, Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 30 (1999), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073999288193 doi: 10.1080/002073999288193
![]() |
[22] |
C. R. Morrow, T. N. L. Patterson, Construction of algebraic cubature rules using polynomial ideal theory, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 15 (1978), 953–976. https://doi.org/10.1137/0715062 doi: 10.1137/0715062
![]() |
[23] |
Z. Yang, R. Huang, W. Zhu, J. Liu, Accurate solutions of structured generalized Kronecker product linear systems, Numer. Algor., 87 (2021), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-020-00988-5 doi: 10.1007/s11075-020-00988-5
![]() |
1. | Qasim Ramzan, Muhammad Amin, Muhammad Faisal, Bayesian inference for modified Weibull distribution under simple step‐stress model based on type‐I censoring, 2022, 38, 0748-8017, 757, 10.1002/qre.3011 | |
2. | Hong Wang, Badamasi Abba, Jianxin Pan, Classical and Bayesian estimations of improved Weibull–Weibull distribution for complete and censored failure times data, 2022, 38, 1524-1904, 997, 10.1002/asmb.2698 | |
3. | Ahmed Elhassanein, A New Type I Half-Logistic Inverse Weibull Distribution with an Application to the Relief Times Data of Patients Receiving an Analgesic, 2022, 12, 2156-7018, 184, 10.1166/jmihi.2022.3937 | |
4. | Rashad A. R. Bantan, Shakaiba Shafiq, M. H. Tahir, Ahmed Elhassanein, Farrukh Jamal, Waleed Almutiry, Mohammed Elgarhy, Muhammad Gulzar, Statistical Analysis of COVID-19 Data: Using A New Univariate and Bivariate Statistical Model, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/2851352 | |
5. | Shuanghong Qu, Yushan Guo, Yajing Xu, Hua Li, Zaoli Yang, A General Numerical Algorithm for CDO Pricing Based on Single Factor Copula Framework and Nonhomogeneous Assumptions, 2022, 2022, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2022/3802445 | |
6. | Qasim Ramzan, Sadia Qamar, Muhammad Amin, Huda M. Alshanbari, Amna Nazeer, Ahmed Elhassanein, Ahmed Mostafa Khalil, On the Extended Generalized Inverted Kumaraswamy Distribution, 2022, 2022, 1687-5273, 1, 10.1155/2022/1612959 | |
7. | Saurabh L. Raikar, Dr. Rajesh S. Prabhu Gaonkar, Jaya algorithm in estimation of P[X > Y] for two parameter Weibull distribution, 2021, 7, 2473-6988, 2820, 10.3934/math.2022156 | |
8. | Ahmed Elhassanein, S.S. Askar, On Statistical Properties of a New Bivariate Modified Lindley Distribution with an Application to Financial Data, 2022, 2022, 1099-0526, 1, 10.1155/2022/2328831 | |
9. | Mahmoud Ragab, Ahmed Elhassanein, David Carf, A New Bivariate Extended Generalized Inverted Kumaraswamy Weibull Distribution, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/1243018 | |
10. | Showkat Ahmad Lone, Qasim Ramzan, Laila A. AL-Essa, The exponentiated Ailamujia distribution: Properties and application, 2024, 108, 11100168, 1, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.036 | |
11. | Neeraj Poonia, Deepak Prajapati, Sarita Azad, The bivariate exponentiated additive Weibull distribution and its multivariate extension with applications, 2024, 188, 03608352, 109886, 10.1016/j.cie.2024.109886 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |