Propagation patterns of dromion and other solitons in nonlinear Phi-Four ($ \phi^4 $) equation

Mohammed Aldandani; Abdulhadi A. Altherwi; Mastoor M. Abushaega; Mohammed Aldandani; Abdulhadi A. Altherwi; Mastoor M. Abushaega

doi:10.3934/math.2024966

AIMS Mathematics

2024, Volume 9, Issue 7: 19786-19811. doi: 10.3934/math.2024966

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Propagation patterns of dromion and other solitons in nonlinear Phi-Four ( $\phi^4$ ) equation

1.
Mathematics Department, College of Science, Jouf University, P. O. Box 2014, Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2.
Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Received: 14 April 2024 Revised: 04 June 2024 Accepted: 12 June 2024 Published: 18 June 2024
MSC : 34G20, 35A20, 35A22, 35R11

The Phi-Four (also embodied as $\phi^4$ ) equation (PFE) is one of the most significant models in nonlinear physics, that emerges in particle physics, condensed matter physics and cosmic theory. In this study, propagating soliton solutions for the PFE were obtained by employing the extended direct algebraic method (EDAM). This transformational method reformulated the model into an assortment of nonlinear algebraic equations using a series-form solution. These equations were then solved with the aid of Maple software, producing a large number of soliton solutions. New families of soliton solutions, including exponential, rational, hyperbolic, and trigonometric functions, are included in these solutions. Using 3D, 2D, and contour graphs, the shape, amplitude, and propagation behaviour of some solitons were visualized which revealed the existence of kink, shock, bright-dark, hump, lump-type, dromion, and periodic solitons in the context of PFE. The study was groundbreaking as it extended the suggested strategy to the PFE that was being aimed at, yielding a significant amount of soliton wave solutions while providing new insights into the behavioral characteristics of soliton. This approach surpassed previous approaches by offering a systematic approach to solving nonlinear problems in analogous challenging situations. Furthermore, the results also showed that the suggested method worked well for building families of propagating soliton solutions for intricate models such as the PFE.

Keywords:

Phi-Four equation,
nonlinear partial differential equation,
extended direct algebraic method,
nonlinear physics,
solitons solutions,
wave transformation

Citation: Mohammed Aldandani, Abdulhadi A. Altherwi, Mastoor M. Abushaega. Propagation patterns of dromion and other solitons in nonlinear Phi-Four ( $\phi^4$ ) equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19786-19811. doi: 10.3934/math.2024966

Related Papers:

[1]	Muqeem Ahmad, Mobin Ahmad, Fatemah Mofarreh . Bi-slant lightlike submanifolds of golden semi-Riemannian manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19526-19545. doi: 10.3934/math.2023996
[2]	Aliya Naaz Siddiqui, Meraj Ali Khan, Amira Ishan . Contact CR $\delta$ -invariant: an optimal estimate for Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29220-29234. doi: 10.3934/math.20241416
[3]	Biswabismita Bag, Meraj Ali Khan, Tanumoy Pal, Shyamal Kumar Hui . Geometric analysis on warped product semi-slant submanifolds of a locally metallic Riemannian space form. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8131-8143. doi: 10.3934/math.2025373
[4]	Mehmet Gülbahar . Qualar curvatures of pseudo Riemannian manifolds and pseudo Riemannian submanifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1366-1376. doi: 10.3934/math.2021085
[5]	Oğuzhan Bahadır . On lightlike geometry of indefinite Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12845-12862. doi: 10.3934/math.2021741
[6]	Richa Agarwal, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sarvesh Kumar Yadav, Shahid Ali, Abdul Haseeb . On Riemannian warped-twisted product submersions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2925-2937. doi: 10.3934/math.2024144
[7]	Fatimah Alghamdi, Fatemah Mofarreh, Akram Ali, Mohamed Lemine Bouleryah . Some rigidity theorems for totally real submanifolds in complex space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8191-8202. doi: 10.3934/math.2025376
[8]	Fatemah Mofarreh, S. K. Srivastava, Anuj Kumar, Akram Ali . Geometric inequalities of $\mathcal{PR}$ -warped product submanifold in para-Kenmotsu manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19481-19509. doi: 10.3934/math.20221069
[9]	Mehmet Atçeken, Tuğba Mert . Characterizations for totally geodesic submanifolds of a $K$ -paracontact manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7320-7332. doi: 10.3934/math.2021430
[10]	Yusuf Dogru . $\eta$ -Ricci-Bourguignon solitons with a semi-symmetric metric and semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11943-11952. doi: 10.3934/math.2023603

Abstract

1. Introduction

The concept of lightlike submanifolds in geometry was initially established and expounded upon in a work produced by Duggal and Bejancu ^[1]. A nondegenerate screen distribution was employed in order to produce a nonintersecting lightlike transversal vector bundle of the tangent bundle. They defined the CR-lightlike submanifold as a generalization of lightlike real hypersurfaces of indefinite Kaehler manifolds and showed that CR-lightlike submanifolds do not contain invariant and totally real lightlike submanifolds. Further, they defined and studied GCR-lightlike submanifolds of Kaehler manifolds as an umbrella of invariant submanifolds, screen real submanifolds, and CR-lightlike and SCR-lightlike submanifolds in ^[2,3], respectively. Subsequently, B. Sahin and R. Gunes investigated geodesic property of CR-lightlike submanifolds ^[4] and the integrability of distributions in CR-lightlike submanifolds ^[5]. In the year 2010, Duggal and Sahin published a book ^[6]pertaining to the field of differential geometry, specifically focusing on the study of lightlike submanifolds. This book provides a comprehensive examination of recent advancements in lightlike geometry, encompassing novel geometric findings, accompanied by rigorous proofs, and exploring their practical implications in the field of mathematical physics. The investigation of the geometric properties of lightlike hypersurfaces and lightlike submanifolds has been the subject of research in several studies (see ^{[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]}).

Crasmareanu and Hretcanu^[15] created a special example of polynomial structure ^[16] on a differentiable manifold, and it is known as the golden structure $(\overline{M}, g)$ . Hretcanu C. E. ^[17] explored Riemannian submanifolds with the golden structure. M. Ahmad and M. A. Qayyoom studied geometrical properties of Riemannian submanifolds with golden structure ^{[18,19,20,21]} and metallic structure ^[22,23]. The integrability of golden structures was examined by A. Gizer et al. ^[24]. Lightlike hypersurfaces of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold was investigated by N. Poyraz and E. Yasar ^[25]. The golden structure was also explored in the studies ^{[26,27,28,29]}.

In this research, we investigate the CR-lightlike submanifolds of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold, drawing inspiration from the aforementioned studies. This paper has the following outlines: Some preliminaries of CR-lightlike submanifolds are defined in Section 2. We establish a number of properties of CR-lightlike submanifolds on golden semi-Riemannian manifolds in Section 3. In Section 4, we look into several CR-lightlike submanifolds characteristics that are totally umbilical. We provide a complex illustration of CR-lightlike submanifolds of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold in the final section.

2. Opening statements

Assume that $(\overline{\aleph}, g)$ is a semi-Riemannian manifold with $(k + j)$ -dimension, $k, j \ge 1$ , and $g$ as a semi-Riemannian metric on $\overline{\aleph}.$ We suppose that $\overline{\aleph}$ is not a Riemannian manifold and the symbol $q$ stands for the constant index of $g$ .

^[15] Let $\overline{\aleph}$ be endowed with a tensor field $\psi$ of type $(1, 1)$ such that

$\begin{equation} \psi^{2} = \psi+I, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

where $I$ represents the identity transformation on $\Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph})$ . The structure $\psi$ is referred to as a golden structure. A metric $g$ is considered $\psi$ -compatible if

$\begin{equation} g(\psi \gamma, \zeta) = g(\gamma, \psi \zeta) \end{equation}$

(2.2)

for all $\gamma$ , $\zeta$ vector fields on $\Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph})$ , then $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is called a golden Riemannian manifold. If we substitute $\psi \gamma$ into $\gamma$ in (2.2), then from (2.1) we have

$\begin{equation} g(\psi \gamma, \psi \zeta) = g(\psi \gamma, \zeta)+g(\gamma, \zeta). \end{equation}$

(2.3)

for any $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph}).$

If $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is a golden Riemannian manifold and $\psi$ is parallel with regard to the Levi-Civita connection $\overline{\nabla}$ on $\overline{\aleph}:$

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}\psi = 0, \end{equation}$

(2.4)

then $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is referred to as a semi-Riemannian manifold with locally golden properties.

The golden structure is the particular case of metallic structure ^[22,23] with $p = 1, \ q = 1$ defined by

$\psi^{2} = p\psi+ qI,$

where $p$ and $q$ are positive integers.

^[1] Consider the case where $\aleph$ is a lightlike submanifold of $k$ of $\overline{\aleph}.$ There is the radical distribution, or $Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)$ , on $\aleph$ that applies to this situation such that $Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) = \Upsilon\aleph \cap \Upsilon\aleph^{\bot},$ $\forall$ $p \in \aleph.$ Since $Rad\Upsilon\aleph$ has rank $r \ge 0,$ $\aleph$ is referred to as an $r$ -lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph}.$ Assume that $\aleph$ is a submanifold of $\aleph$ that is $r$ -lightlike. A screen distribution is what we refer to as the complementary distribution of a Rad distribution on $\Upsilon \aleph$ , then

$\begin{equation} \label{1e1} \nonumber \Upsilon \aleph = Rad\Upsilon\aleph \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph). \end{equation}$

As $S(\Upsilon\aleph)$ is a nondegenerate vector sub-bundle of $\Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph},$ we have

$\begin{equation} \label{1e2} \nonumber \Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph} = S(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot}, \end{equation}$

where $S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot}$ consists of the orthogonal vector sub-bundle that is complementary to $S(\Upsilon\aleph)$ in $\Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph}.$ $S(\Upsilon\aleph), S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})$ is an orthogonal direct decomposition, and they are nondegenerate.

$\begin{equation} \label{1e3} \nonumber S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot} = S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})^{\bot}. \end{equation}$

Let the vector bundle

$\begin{equation} \label{1e4} \nonumber tr(\Upsilon\aleph) = ltr(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}). \end{equation}$

Thus,

$\begin{equation} \label{1e5} \nonumber \Upsilon\overline{\aleph} = \Upsilon\aleph \oplus tr(\Upsilon\aleph) = S(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}) \bot (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)\oplus ltr(\Upsilon\aleph). \end{equation}$

Assume that the Levi-Civita connection is $\overline{\nabla}$ on $\overline{\aleph}.$ We have

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta + h(\gamma, \zeta), \; \forall \, \gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph) \end{equation}$

(2.5)

and

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = - A_{h}\zeta + \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}h, \; \forall \gamma \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)\; and \; h \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)), \end{equation}$

(2.6)

where $\{ \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, A_{h}\gamma \}$ and $\{ h(\gamma, \zeta), \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}h \}$ belongs to $\Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)$ and $\Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ respectively.

Using projection $L : tr(\Upsilon\aleph) \rightarrow ltr(\Upsilon\aleph),$ and $S: tr(\Upsilon\aleph) \rightarrow S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}),$ we have

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta + h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta) + h^{s}(\gamma, \zeta), \end{equation}$

(2.7)

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\aleph = - A_{\aleph}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}\aleph + \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \aleph), \end{equation}$

(2.8)

and

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \chi = - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s} + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi) \end{equation}$

(2.9)

for any $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \aleph \in \Gamma (ltr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ and $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ where $h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta) = Lh(\gamma, \zeta), \; h^{s}(\gamma, \zeta) = Sh(\gamma, \zeta), \; \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}\aleph, \; \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi) \in \Gamma (ltr(\mathcal{T}\aleph)), \; \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\; \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \aleph) \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ and $\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \; A_{\aleph}\gamma, \; A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph).$

The projection morphism of $\Upsilon\aleph$ on the screen is represented by $P$ , and we take the distribution into consideration.

$\begin{array}{c} \nabla_{\gamma}P\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}^{*}P\zeta + h^{*}(\gamma, P\zeta), \\ \nabla_{\gamma}\xi = - A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{*t}\xi, \end{array}$

(2.10)

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma(\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma(Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)).$

Thus, we have the subsequent equation.

$\begin{equation} {g}(h^{*}(\gamma, P\zeta), \aleph) = g(A_{\aleph}\gamma, P\zeta), \end{equation}$

(2.11)

Consider that $\overline{\nabla}$ is a metric connection. We get

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}{g})(\zeta, \eta) = {g}(h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta), \eta)+ {g}(h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta \eta), \zeta). \end{equation}$

(2.12)

Using the characteristics of a linear connection, we can obtain

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \eta) = \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}(h^{l}(\zeta, \eta))- h^{l}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \eta)-h^{l}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\eta), \end{equation}$

(2.13)

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \eta) = \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}(h^{s}(\zeta, \eta))- h^{s}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \eta)-h^{s}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\eta). \end{equation}$

(2.14)

Based on the description of a CR-lightlike submanifold in ^[4], we have

$\Upsilon\aleph = \lambda \oplus \lambda',$

where $\lambda = Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot {\psi} Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot \lambda_{0}.$

$S$ and $Q$ stand for the projection on $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$ , respectively, then

$\begin{equation} \label{1e11} \nonumber {\psi}\gamma = f\gamma + w\gamma \end{equation}$

for $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph),$ where $f\gamma = {\psi}S\gamma$ and $w\gamma = {\psi}Q\gamma.$

On the other hand, we have

$\begin{equation} \label{1e12} \nonumber {\psi}\zeta = B\zeta + C\zeta \end{equation}$

for any $\zeta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ $B\zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)$ and $C\zeta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ unless $\aleph_{1}$ and $\aleph_{2}$ are denoted as ${\psi}L_{1}$ and ${\psi}L_{2},$ respectively.

Lemma 2.1. Assume that the screen distribution is totally geodesic and that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold, then $\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon N)),$ where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)).$

Proof. For $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph)),$

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - h(\gamma, \zeta), \aleph)\\ & = & - {g} (\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \aleph). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.8),

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) & = & - {g}(\zeta, -A_{\aleph}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}\aleph) \\ & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\aleph}\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.11),

${g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) = {g}(h^{*}(\gamma, \zeta), \aleph).$

Since screen distribution is totally geodesic, $h^{*}(\gamma, \zeta) = 0,$

${g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) = 0.$

Using Lemma 1.2 in ^[1] p.g. 142, we have

$\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)),$

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)).$

Theorem 2.2. Assume that $\aleph$ is a locally golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ with CR-lightlike properties, then $\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma = \psi\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma$ for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

Proof. Assume that $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$ Using (2.5), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\psi\gamma-h(\gamma, \psi\gamma), \zeta)\\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta) \\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta), \\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma - \psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta) & = & 0. \end{eqnarray}$

Nondegeneracy of $\lambda_{0}$ implies

$\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma = \psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma),$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

3. Geodesic CR-lightlike submanifolds

Definition 3.1. ^[4] A CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold is mixed geodesic if $h$ satisfies

$h(\gamma, \alpha) = 0,$

where $h$ stands for second fundamental form, $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda),$ and $\alpha \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

For $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda)$ and $\alpha, \beta \in \Gamma (\lambda')$ if

$h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

and

$h(\alpha, \beta) = 0,$

then it is known as $\lambda$ -geodesic and $\lambda'$ -geodesic, respectively.

Theorem 3.2. Assume $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph}$ , which is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold. $\aleph$ is totally geodesic if

$(L_{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

and

$(L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

for $\alpha, \beta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)) \;$ , and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. Since $\aleph$ is totally geodesic, then

$h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

for $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph).$

We know that $h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$ if

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0$

and

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0.$

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \xi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \xi] + \overline{\nabla}_{\xi}\gamma \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \xi]) + {g}(\gamma, [\xi, \zeta]) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\xi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\xi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) - {g}(\xi, h(\gamma, \zeta))) \\ 2{g}(h(\gamma, \zeta) & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Since ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0,$ we have

$\begin{equation} \label{2e1} \nonumber (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0. \end{equation}$

Similarly,

$\begin{eqnarray} \ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \chi]) + {g}(\gamma, [\chi, \zeta]) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\chi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\chi, \gamma) \\ 2{g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Since ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0,$ we get

$\begin{equation} \label{2e2} \nonumber (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0 \end{equation}$

for $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Lemma 3.3. Assume that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold whose submanifold $\aleph$ is CR-lightlike, then

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, \zeta)$

for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda') \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. Using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {g} (h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & {g}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.9), it follows that

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - {g}(\zeta, - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \chi)) \\ {} & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma) - {g} (\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi) - {g}(\zeta, \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \chi)) \\ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma), \end{eqnarray}$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda') \; , \; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Theorem 3.4. Assume that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold and $\overline{\aleph}$ is mixed geodesic if

$A^{*}_{\xi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot {\psi}L_{1})$

and

$A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot {\psi}L_{1})$

for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)), \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. For $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda'), \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ we get

Using (2.5),

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \xi) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Again using (2.5), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & - {g}(\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}\xi + h(\gamma, \xi)) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.10), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & - {g}( \zeta, - A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma + \nabla^{*t}_{\gamma}\xi) \\ {g}( \zeta, A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma)& = & 0. \end{eqnarray}$

Since the CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ is mixed geodesic, we have

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g}( \zeta, A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma) = 0$

$\Rightarrow A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot {\psi}L_{1}),$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

From (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.9), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - {g} (\zeta, - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi))\\ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g} (\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

Since, $\aleph$ is mixed geodesic, then ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g} (\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma) = 0.$

$A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot\psi_{1}).$

Theorem 3.5. Suppose that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph},$ then $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ -geodesic if $A_{\chi}\eta$ and $A_{\xi}^{*}\eta$ have no component in $\aleph_{2}\bot {\psi}Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)$ for $\eta \in \Gamma (\lambda'), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)), \; \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. From (2.5), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - \overline{g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi), \end{eqnarray}$

where $\chi, \beta \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & - {g}(\beta, - A_{\chi}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{s}+ \lambda^{l}(\eta, \chi)) \\ {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & {g}(\beta, A_{\chi}\eta) . \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

Since $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ -geodesic, then ${g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) = 0.$

From (3.1), we get

${g}(\beta, A_{\chi}\eta) = 0.$

Now,

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta - \nabla_{\eta}\beta, \xi) \\ {} & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta, \xi) = - {g}(\beta, \overline{\nabla}_{\eta} \xi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & - {g}(\eta, - A_{\xi}^{*}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{*t}\xi) \\ {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\xi}^{*}\beta, \eta). \label{2e4} \end{eqnarray}$

Since $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ - geodesic, then

${g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g}( A_{\xi}^{*}\beta, \eta) = 0.$

Thus, $A_{\chi}\eta$ and $A^{*}_{\xi}\eta$ have no component in $M_{2}\bot \psi Rad(\Upsilon\aleph).$

Lemma 3.6. Assume that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold that has a CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ . Due to the distribution's integrability, the following criteria hold.

(ⅰ) $\psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) - {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi}\zeta),$

(ⅱ) ${g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma), \xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi} \xi),$

(ⅲ) ${g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi),$

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ and $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. From Eq (2.9), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\chi + A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma - \nabla_{\psi\gamma}^{s}\chi, \zeta) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & - {g}(\chi, {\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\zeta + h({\psi}\gamma, \zeta)) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta)\\ {} & = & - {g}(\chi, h(\gamma, {\psi}\zeta)) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Again, using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}{\psi}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}{\psi}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) \\ {} & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi, {\psi}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & {g}(- A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) + \\ {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi}\zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

(ⅱ) Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma - \nabla_{{\psi}\gamma}^{s}\chi + {\nabla}_{{\psi}\gamma}\chi, \xi ) \\ {} & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \xi) - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{{\psi}\gamma}\xi ). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \xi) + {g}(\chi, A^{*}_{\xi}{\psi}\gamma ) - {g}(\chi, \nabla^{*t}_{{\psi}\gamma}, \xi) \\ {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi} \xi). \end{eqnarray}$

(ⅲ) Replacing $\zeta$ by $\psi\xi$ in (ⅰ), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi^{2}}\xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi^{2}}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Using Definition 2.1 in ^[18] p.g. 9, we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), (\psi+I)\xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, (\psi+I)\xi)\\ \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - \\ && {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \xi).\\ {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

4. Totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifolds

Definition 4.1. ^[12] A CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold is totally umbilical if there is a smooth transversal vector field $H \in tr\ \Gamma (\Upsilon \aleph)$ that satisfies

$h(\chi, \eta) = H g(\chi, \eta),$

where $h$ is stands for second fundamental form and $\chi, \ \eta \in \ \Gamma (\Upsilon \aleph).$

Theorem 4.2. Assume that the screen distribution is totally geodesic and that $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ , then

$A_{\psi \eta}\chi = A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \; \forall \; \chi, \eta \in \Gamma \lambda'.$

Proof. Given that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold,

$\psi\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\chi = \overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\psi\chi.$

Using (2.5) and (2.6), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi(\nabla_{\eta}\chi) + \psi(h(\eta, \chi)) & = & - A_{\psi\chi}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{t}\psi\chi. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

Interchanging $\eta$ and $\chi$ , we obtain

$\begin{equation} \psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta) + \psi(h(\chi, \eta)) = - A_{\psi \eta}\chi + \nabla_{\chi}^{t}\psi \eta. \end{equation}$

(4.2)

Subtracting Eqs (4.1) and (4.2), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi(\nabla_{\eta}\chi - \nabla_{\chi}\eta) - \nabla_{\eta}^{t}\psi\chi + \nabla_{\chi}^{t}\psi \eta & = & A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.3)

Taking the inner product with $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0})$ in (4.3), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \gamma) - {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \gamma) & = & {g}(A_{\psi \eta}\chi, \gamma) \\ && -{g}(A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma). \\ {g}(A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma) = {g}&(\nabla_{\chi}\eta,&- \psi\gamma) {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.4)

Now,

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\eta - h(\chi, \eta), \psi\gamma) \\ {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & - {g}(\eta, (\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\psi)\gamma - \psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\gamma)). \end{eqnarray}$

Since $\psi$ is parallel to $\overline{\nabla},$ i.e., $\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\psi = 0,$

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = - \psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\gamma)).$

Using (2.7), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = &- {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma + h^{s}(\chi, \gamma) + h^{l}(\chi, \gamma))\\ {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & - {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma) - {g}(\psi \eta, h^{s}(\chi, \gamma)) - {g}(\psi \eta, h^{l}(\chi, \gamma)). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.5)

Since $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold and the screen distribution is totally geodesic,

$h^{s}(\chi, \gamma) = H^{s}{g}(\chi, \gamma) = 0$

and

$h^{l}(\chi, \gamma) = H^{l}{g}(\chi, \gamma) = 0,$

where $\chi \in \Gamma (\lambda')$ and $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

From (4.5), we have

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = - {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma).$

From Lemma 2.1, we get

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = 0.$

Similarly,

${g}(\nabla_{\eta}\chi, \psi\gamma) = 0$

Using (4.4), we have

$g(A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma) = 0.$

Since $\lambda_{0}$ is nondegenerate,

$A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi \chi}\eta = 0$

$\Rightarrow A_{\psi \eta}\chi = A_{\psi\chi}\eta.$

Theorem 4.3. Let $\aleph$ be the totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ . Consequently, $\aleph$ 's sectional curvature, which is CR-lightlike, vanishes, resulting in $\overline{K}(\pi) = 0,$ for the entire CR-lightlike section $\pi.$

Proof. We know that $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph},$ then from (2.13) and (2.14),

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma}H^{l}-H^{l}\{ (\nabla_{\gamma}g)(\zeta, \omega)\} , \end{eqnarray}$

(4.6)

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma}H^{s}-H^{s}\{ (\nabla_{\gamma}g)(\zeta, \omega)\} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.7)

for a CR-lightlike section $\pi = \gamma\wedge \omega, \; \gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}), \omega \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

From (2.12), we have $(\nabla_{U}g)(\zeta, \omega) = 0.$ Therefore, from (4.6) and (4.7), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma}H^{l} , \end{eqnarray}$

(4.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma}H^{s} . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.9)

Now, from (4.8) and (4.9), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \{\overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta)\omega \}^{tr} & = & g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}- g(\gamma, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\zeta} H^{l} + g(\zeta, \omega)\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}) \\ && - g(\gamma, \omega)\lambda^{l}(\zeta, H^{s})+g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}-g(\gamma, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\zeta}H^{s} \\ && +g(\zeta, \omega)\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l})-g(\gamma, \omega)\lambda^{s}(\zeta, H^{l}). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.10)

For any $\beta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph))$ , from Equation (4.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta, \omega, \beta ) & = & g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}, \beta)- g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\zeta} H^{l}, \beta) + \\ && g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}), \zeta) - g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\lambda^{l}(\zeta, H^{s}), \beta)+ \\ && g(\zeta, \omega) {g}(\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}, \beta)-g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\nabla^{s}_{\zeta}H^{s}, \beta) \\ && +g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l}), \beta)- g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\lambda^{s}(\zeta, H^{l}, \beta). \label{4e11} \end{eqnarray}$

$\begin{eqnarray} {R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega ) & = & g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}, \psi\omega)- g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\omega} H^{l}, \psi\omega) + \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}), \psi\omega) - g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{l}(\omega, H^{s}), \psi\omega)+ \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma) {g}(\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}, \psi\omega)-g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{s}_{\omega}H^{s}, \psi\omega) + \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l}), \psi\omega)- g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{s}(\omega, H^{l}, \psi U). \label{4e13} \end{eqnarray}$

For any unit vectors $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda)$ and $\omega \in \Gamma (\lambda'),$ we have

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega) = \overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \gamma, \omega) = 0.$

We have

$K(\gamma) = K_{N}(\gamma \wedge \zeta) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta)\zeta, \gamma),$

where

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \gamma, \omega) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega)\gamma, \omega)$

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega)\psi\gamma, \psi\omega)$

i.e.,

$\overline{K}(\pi) = 0$

for all CR-sections $\pi.$

5. Example

Example 5.1. We consider a semi-Riemannian manifold $R_{2}^{6}$ and a submanifold $\aleph$ of co-dimension $2$ in $R_{2}^{6},$ given by equations

$\upsilon_{5} = \upsilon_{1}{\mathrm{cos}}\alpha - \upsilon_{2}{\mathrm{sin}}\alpha - \upsilon_{3}z_{4} {\mathrm{tan}}\alpha,$

$\upsilon_{6} = \upsilon_{1}{\mathrm{sin}}\alpha - \upsilon_{2}{\mathrm{cos}}\alpha - \upsilon_{3}\upsilon_{4},$

where $\alpha \in R - \{ \frac{\pi}{2} + k\pi; \ k \in z \}.$ The structure on $R^{6}_{2}$ is defined by

$\psi( \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} , \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}) = (\overline{\phi} \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \overline{\phi} \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} ).$

Now,

$\psi^{2} ( \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} , \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}) = ((\overline{\phi}+ 1) \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, (\overline{\phi} + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, (\phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, (\phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}},$

$( \phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}}, ( \phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} )$

$\psi^{2} = \psi + I.$

It follows that $(R_{2}^{6}, \psi)$ is a golden semi-Reimannian manifold.

The tangent bundle $\Upsilon\aleph$ is spanned by

$Z_{0} = - {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \mathrm{cos}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} - \phi \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}},$

$Z_{1} = - \phi \ {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \phi \ {\mathrm{cos}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} + \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}},$

$Z_{2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \overline{\phi} \ {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}},$

$Z_{3} = - \overline{\phi} \ {\mathrm{cos}} \alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}} + i \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}.$

Thus, $\aleph$ is a 1-lightlike submanifold of $R_{2}^{6}$ with $Rad\Upsilon\aleph = \mathrm{Span}\{X_{0}\}$ . Using golden structure of $R_{2}^{6},$ we obtain that $X_{1} = \psi(X_{0}).$ Thus, $\psi(Rad\Upsilon\aleph)$ is a distribution on $\aleph.$ Hence, the $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold.

6. Conclusions

In general relativity, particularly in the context of the black hole theory, lightlike geometry finds its uses. An investigation is made into the geometry of the $\aleph$ golden semi-Riemannian manifolds that are CR-lightlike in nature. There are many intriguing findings on completely umbilical and completely geodesic CR-lightlike submanifolds that are examined. We present a required condition for a CR-lightlike submanifold to be completely geodesic. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the sectional curvature $K$ of an entirely umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ disappears.

Use of AI tools declaration

The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

Acknowledgments

The present work (manuscript number IU/R $\&$ D/2022-MCN0001708) received financial assistance from Integral University in Lucknow, India as a part of the seed money project IUL/IIRC/SMP/2021/010. All of the authors would like to express their gratitude to the university for this support. The authors are highly grateful to editors and referees for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving the paper. The present manuscript represents the corrected version of preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2210.10445. The revised version incorporates the identities of all those who have made contributions, taking into account their respective skills and understanding.

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interests.

References

[1]	W. Gao, H. Rezazadeh, Z. Pinar, H. Baskonus, S. Sarwar, G. Yel, Novel explicit solutions for the nonlinear Zoomeron equation by using newly extended direct algebraic technique, Opt. Quant. Electron., 52 (2020), 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11082-019-2162-8 doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-2162-8
[2]	M. Khater, Solitary wave solutions for the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony nonlinear evolution equation, Global J. Sci. Front. Res. Phys. Space Sci., 16 (2016), 37–41.
[3]	H. Bulut, T. Sulaiman, H. Baskonus, H. Rezazadeh, M. Eslami, M. Mirzazadeh, Optical solitons and other solutions to the conformable space time fractional Fokas Lenells equation, Optik, 172 (2018), 20–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.108 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.108
[4]	S. Vlase, M. Marin, A. Öchsner, M. Scutaru, Motion equation for a flexible one-dimensional element used in the dynamical analysis of a multibody system, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 31 (2019), 715–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00161-018-0722-y doi: 10.1007/s00161-018-0722-y
[5]	M. Khater, A. Seadawy, D. Lu, Bifurcations of solitary wave solutions for (two and three)-dimensional nonlinear partial differential equation in quantum and magnetized plasma by using two different methods, Results Phys., 9 (2018), 142–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.010 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.010
[6]	V. Senthil Kumar, H. Rezazadeh, M. Eslami, F. Izadi, M. Osman, Jacobi elliptic function expansion method for solving KdV equation with conformable derivative and dual-power law nonlinearity, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 5 (2019), 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40819-019-0710-3 doi: 10.1007/s40819-019-0710-3
[7]	M. Khater, A. Seadawy, D. Lu, Dispersive solitary wave solutions of new coupled Konno-Oono, Higgs field and Maccari equations and their applications, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 30 (2018), 417–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2017.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2017.11.003
[8]	M. Ghasemi, High order approximations using spline-based differential quadrature method: implementation to the multi-dimensional PDEs, Appl. Math. Model., 46 (2017), 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.052 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.052
[9]	S. Noor, W. Albalawi, R. Shah, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, S. Ismaeel, S. El-Tantawy, On the approximations to fractional nonlinear damped Burger's-type equations that arise in fluids and plasmas using Aboodh residual power series and Aboodh transform iteration methods, Front. Phys., 12 (2024), 1374481. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1374481 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1374481
[10]	N. Perrone, R. Kao, A general finite difference method for arbitrary meshes, Comput. Struct., 5 (1975), 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(75)90018-8 doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(75)90018-8
[11]	M. Abdou, A. Soliman, New applications of variational iteration method, Physica D, 211 (2005), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2005.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2005.08.002
[12]	M. Hammad, R. Shah, B. Alotaibi, M. Alotiby, C. Tiofack, A. Alrowaily, et al., On the modified versions of $\frac{G'}{G}$ -expansion technique for analyzing the fractional coupled Higgs system, AIP Adv., 13 (2023), 105131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0167916 doi: 10.1063/5.0167916
[13]	E. Yusufoğlu, A. Bekir, Solitons and periodic solutions of coupled nonlinear evolution equations by using the sine cosine method, Int. J. Comput. Math., 83 (2006), 915–924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207160601138756 doi: 10.1080/00207160601138756
[14]	Y. Chen, B. Li, H. Zhang, Generalized Riccati equation expansion method and its application to the Bogoyavlenskii's generalized breaking soliton equation, Chinese Phys., 12 (2003), 940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1009-1963/12/9/303 doi: 10.1088/1009-1963/12/9/303
[15]	H. Liu, T. Zhang, A note on the improved $\tan (\phi (\xi)/2)$ -expansion method, Optik, 131 (2017), 273–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.11.029 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.11.029
[16]	M. Guo, H. Dong, J. Liu, H. Yang, The time-fractional mZK equation for gravity solitary waves and solutions using sech-tanh and radial basic function method, Nonlinear Anal.-Model., 24 (2018), 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/NA.2019.1.1 doi: 10.15388/NA.2019.1.1
[17]	M. Kaplan, A. Bekir, A. Akbulut, E. Aksoy, The modified simple equation method for nonlinear fractional differential equations, Rom. J. Phys., 60 (2015), 1374–1383.
[18]	K. L. Wang, K. J. Wang, C. He, Physical insight of local fractional calculus and its application to fractional Kdv-Burgers-Kuramoto equation, Fractals, 27 (2019), 1950122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X19501226 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X19501226
[19]	K. L. Wang, K. J. Wang, A modification of the reduced differential transform method for fractional calculus, Therm. Sci., 22 (2018), 1871–1875. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI1804871W doi: 10.2298/TSCI1804871W
[20]	K. J. Wang, On a high-pass filter described by local fractional derivative, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2050031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X20500310 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20500310
[21]	R. Ali, Z. Zhang, H. Ahmad, Exploring soliton solutions in nonlinear spatiotemporal fractional quantum mechanics equations: an analytical study, Opt. Quant. Electron., 56 (2024), 838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-06370-2 doi: 10.1007/s11082-024-06370-2
[22]	A. Iftikhar, A. Ghafoor, T. Zubair, S. Firdous, S. Mohyud-Din, (G'/G, 1/G)-expansion method for traveling wave solutions of (2+1) dimensional generalized KdV, Sin Gordon and Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equations, Sci. Res. Essays, 8 (2013), 1349–1359. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/SRE2013.5555 doi: 10.5897/SRE2013.5555
[23]	R. Ali, S. Barak, A. Altalbe, Analytical study of soliton dynamics in the realm of fractional extended shallow water wave equations, Phys. Scr., 99 (2024), 065235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad4784 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad4784
[24]	M. Bhatti, D. Lu, An application of Nwogu Boussinesq model to analyze the head-on collision process between hydroelastic solitary waves, Open Phys., 17 (2019), 177–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/phys-2019-0018 doi: 10.1515/phys-2019-0018
[25]	S. Behera, N. Aljahdaly, Nonlinear evolution equations and their traveling wave solutions in fluid media by modified analytical method, Pramana, 97 (2023), 130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12043-023-02602-4 doi: 10.1007/s12043-023-02602-4
[26]	H. Khan, S. Barak, P. Kumam, M. Arif, Analytical solutions of fractional Klein-Gordon and gas dynamics equations, via the (G'/G)-expansion method, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 566. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym11040566 doi: 10.3390/sym11040566
[27]	J. He, X. Wu, Exp-function method for nonlinear wave equations, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 30 (2006), 700–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020
[28]	A. Alharbi, M. Almatrafi, Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE approach on the partial differential equations and applications, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 15 (2020), 367–388.
[29]	W. Thadee, A. Chankaew, S. Phoosree, Effects of wave solutions on shallow-water equation, optical-fibre equation and electric-circuit equation, Maejo Int. J. Sci. Tech., 16 (2022), 262–274.
[30]	J. Alzaidy, Fractional sub-equation method and its applications to the space-time fractional differential equations in mathematical physics, British Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 3 (2013), 153–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2013/2908 doi: 10.9734/BJMCS/2013/2908
[31]	M. Cinar, A. Secer, M. Ozisik, M. Bayram, Derivation of optical solitons of dimensionless Fokas-Lenells equation with perturbation term using Sardar sub-equation method, Opt. Quant. Electron., 54 (2022), 402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03819-0 doi: 10.1007/s11082-022-03819-0
[32]	K. J. Wang, F. Shi, Multi-soliton solutions and soliton molecules of the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation for the incompressible fluid, EPL, 145 (2024), 42001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ad219d doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/ad219d
[33]	M. Alqhtani, K. Saad, R. Shah, W. Hamanah, Discovering novel soliton solutions for (3+1)-modified fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in electrical engineering through an analytical approach, Opt. Quant. Electron., 55 (2023), 1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05407-2 doi: 10.1007/s11082-023-05407-2
[34]	H. Yasmin, N. Aljahdaly, A. Saeed, R. Shah, Probing families of optical soliton solutions in fractional perturbed Radhakrishnan Kundu Lakshmanan model with improved versions of extended direct algebraic method, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7070512 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7070512
[35]	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, H. Yasmin, R. Shah, A. Ganie, K. Moaddy, Unraveling the dynamics of singular stochastic solitons in stochastic fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 753. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7100753 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7100753
[36]	H. Yasmin, N. Aljahdaly, A. Saeed, R. Shah, Investigating families of soliton solutions for the complex structured coupled fractional Biswas-Arshed model in birefringent fibers using a novel analytical technique, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 491. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7070491 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7070491
[37]	W. Gao, P. Veeresha, D. Prakasha, H. Baskonus, G. Yel, New numerical results for the time-fractional Phi-four equation using a novel analytical approach, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 478. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym12030478 doi: 10.3390/sym12030478
[38]	H. Rezazadeh, H. Tariq, M. Eslami, M. Mirzazadeh, Q. Zhou, New exact solutions of nonlinear conformable time-fractional Phi-4 equation, Chinese J. Phys., 56 (2018), 2805–2816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2018.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2018.08.001
[39]	M. Khater, A. Mousa, M. El-Shorbagy, R. Attia, Analytical and semi-analytical solutions for Phi-four equation through three recent schemes, Results Phys., 22 (2021), 103954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103954 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103954
[40]	Z. Li, T. Han, C. Huang, Bifurcation and new exact traveling wave solutions for time-space fractional Phi-4 equation, AIP Adv., 10 (2020), 115113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0029159 doi: 10.1063/5.0029159
[41]	S. Bibi, N. Ahmed, U. Khan, S. Mohyud-Din, Auxiliary equation method for ill-posed Boussinesq equation, Phys. Scr., 94 (2019), 085213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab1951 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ab1951
[42]	M. Abdelrahman, H. Alkhidhr, Closed-form solutions to the conformable space-time fractional simplified MCH equation and time fractional Phi-4 equation, Results Phys., 18 (2020), 103294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103294 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103294
[43]	F. Mahmud, M. Samsuzzoha, M. Ali Akbar, The generalized Kudryashov method to obtain exact traveling wave solutions of the PHI-four equation and the Fisher equation, Results Phys., 7 (2017), 4296–4302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.049 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.049
[44]	M. Younis, A. Zafar, The modified simple equation method for solving nonlinear Phi-Four equation, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 2 (2013), 661–664.
[45]	P. Sunthrayuth, N. Aljahdaly, A. Ali, R. Shah, I. Mahariq, A. Tchalla, $\phi$ -Haar wavelet operational matrix method for fractional relaxation-oscillation equations containing $\phi$ -Caputo fractional derivative, J. Funct. Space., 2021 (2021), 7117064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7117064 doi: 10.1155/2021/7117064
[46]	S. Noor, H. Alyousef, A. Shafee, R. Shah, S. El-Tantawy, A novel analytical technique for analyzing the (3+1)-dimensional fractional calogero-bogoyavlenskii-schiff equation: investigating solitary/shock waves and many others physical phenomena, Phys. Scr., 99 (2024), 065257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad49d9 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad49d9
[47]	S. Noor, A. Alshehry, A. Shafee, R. Shah, Families of propagating soliton solutions for (3+1)-fractional Wazwaz-BenjaminBona-Mahony equation through a novel modification of modified extended direct algebraic method, Phys. Scr., 99 (2024), 045230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad23b0 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad23b0
[48]	H. Yasmin, A. Alshehry, A. Ganie, A. Mahnashi, R. Shah, Perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation: soliton solutions via Backlund transformation, Optik, 298 (2024), 171576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171576 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171576
[49]	S. El-Tantawy, H. Alyousef, R. Matoog, R. Shah, On the optical soliton solutions to the fractional complex structured (1+1)-dimensional perturbed gerdjikov-ivanov equation, Phys. Scr., 99 (2024), 035249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad241b doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad241b
[50]	S. Alshammari, K. Moaddy, R. Shah, M. Alshammari, Z. Alsheekhhussain, M. Mossa Al-sawalha, et al., Analysis of solitary wave solutions in the fractional-order Kundu-Eckhaus system, Sci. Rep., 14 (2024), 3688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53330-7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53330-7
[51]	H. Yasmin, A. Alshehry, A. Ganie, A. Shafee, R. Shah, Noise effect on soliton phenomena in fractional stochastic Kraenkel-Manna-Merle system arising in ferromagnetic materials, Sci. Rep., 14 (2024), 1810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52211-3 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52211-3

This article has been cited by:

Bang-Yen Chen, Majid Ali Choudhary, Afshan Perween, A Comprehensive Review of Golden Riemannian Manifolds, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 724, 10.3390/axioms13100724

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)