In this paper, the Lie symmetry analysis was executed for the nonlinear fractional-order conduction-diffusion Buckmaster model (BM), which involves the Riemann-Liouville (R-L) derivative of fractional-order 'β'. In the study of groundwater flow and oil reservoir engineering where fluid flow through porous materials is crucial, BM played an important role. The Lie point infinitesimal generators and Lie algebra were constructed for the equation. The Lie symmetries were acquired for the ordinary fractional-order BM. The power series solution and its convergence were also analyzed with the application of the implicit theorem. Noether's theorem was employed to ensure the consistency of a system by deriving the conservation laws of its physical model.
Citation: A. Tomar, H. Kumar, M. Ali, H. Gandhi, D. Singh, G. Pathak. Application of symmetry analysis and conservation laws to a fractional-order nonlinear conduction-diffusion model[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17154-17170. doi: 10.3934/math.2024833
[1] | Miao Yang, Lizhen Wang . Lie symmetry group, exact solutions and conservation laws for multi-term time fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30038-30058. doi: 10.3934/math.20231536 |
[2] | Alessandra Jannelli, Maria Paola Speciale . On the numerical solutions of coupled nonlinear time-fractional reaction-diffusion equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 9109-9125. doi: 10.3934/math.2021529 |
[3] | Wei Fan, Kangqun Zhang . Local well-posedness results for the nonlinear fractional diffusion equation involving a Erdélyi-Kober operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25494-25512. doi: 10.3934/math.20241245 |
[4] | Iman Ben Othmane, Lamine Nisse, Thabet Abdeljawad . On Cauchy-type problems with weighted R-L fractional derivatives of a function with respect to another function and comparison theorems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14106-14129. doi: 10.3934/math.2024686 |
[5] | Kangqun Zhang . Existence and uniqueness of positive solution of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Erdélyi-Kober operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1358-1372. doi: 10.3934/math.2024067 |
[6] | Ravi Agarwal, Snezhana Hristova, Donal O'Regan . Integral presentations of the solution of a boundary value problem for impulsive fractional integro-differential equations with Riemann-Liouville derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2973-2988. doi: 10.3934/math.2022164 |
[7] | Yujun Cui, Chunyu Liang, Yumei Zou . Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a class of fractional differential equation with lower-order derivative dependence. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3797-3818. doi: 10.3934/math.2025176 |
[8] | Ishfaq Mallah, Idris Ahmed, Ali Akgul, Fahd Jarad, Subhash Alha . On $ \psi $-Hilfer generalized proportional fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 82-103. doi: 10.3934/math.2022005 |
[9] | Hasanen A. Hammad, Hassen Aydi, Maryam G. Alshehri . Solving hybrid functional-fractional equations originating in biological population dynamics with an effect on infectious diseases. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14574-14593. doi: 10.3934/math.2024709 |
[10] | Md. Asaduzzaman, Md. Zulfikar Ali . Existence of positive solution to the boundary value problems for coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 880-895. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.880 |
In this paper, the Lie symmetry analysis was executed for the nonlinear fractional-order conduction-diffusion Buckmaster model (BM), which involves the Riemann-Liouville (R-L) derivative of fractional-order 'β'. In the study of groundwater flow and oil reservoir engineering where fluid flow through porous materials is crucial, BM played an important role. The Lie point infinitesimal generators and Lie algebra were constructed for the equation. The Lie symmetries were acquired for the ordinary fractional-order BM. The power series solution and its convergence were also analyzed with the application of the implicit theorem. Noether's theorem was employed to ensure the consistency of a system by deriving the conservation laws of its physical model.
In recent decades, fractional-order mathematical models and their application have found huge attention in various disciplines. The reason for the popularity of the fractional-order differential equations is mainly due to the evolution of the theory of fractional calculus and their capacity to explain complex phenomena. Fractional order differential equations are a generalization of integral order differential equations and can be generalized in time and space with the help of a power-law type long memory kernel of the nonlocal operator. The fractional-order model furnishes a robust tool to explain the memories of various materials and the nature of the legacy. Altogether, these studies have a translucent visible background, which unblocks a new branch of research involving hypothetical and numerical analysis of various fractional-order dynamical systems in fluid dynamics, mechanics, biological modelling, physics, engineering, and areas of medical and other sciences. Podlubny [1], Oldham [2], Debnath [3], and Kilbas et al. [4] have elucidated the significance and practical implications of employing local generalized derivatives of fractional order in real-world phenomena.
Fractional order systems have been solved with a different group of methodologies. Wazwaz [5,6] applied the variation iterative method, Tanh method, and sine-cosine analysis to linear and nonlinear systems. Gardner equation has been solved by Lin et al. [7] with the imposition of the tanh-coth method and Iyiola et al. [8,9] have described applications of Caputo fractional derivatives in different nonlinear time-fractional homogeneous and non-homogeneous models. Jafari et al. [10] explored the numerical scheme to study the system of fractional PDEs. Gandhi et al. [11,12,13,14,15] studied the numerous fractional order PDEs using different techniques.
In recent times, Lie symmetry theory plays a very important role in the invariant analysis of Fractional differential equations. Olver [16] emphasized a wide range of applications of Lie group symmetries analysis to partial differential equations (PDEs). Bakkyaraj and Sahadevan [17] illustrated Lie group transformation to solve the fractional-order system. Moyo & Leach [18] presented the mathematical cancer model by symmetry analysis. The time-fractional Korteweg-de-Varies equations have been solved by Zhang [19]. Biswas et al. [20,21] organized multiple objectives like solitons, bifurcation analysis, conservation analysis, dual dispersion, and nonlinearity laws of Boussinesq equation. Bansal et al. [22] have designed optical perturbation, Lie group invariants to Fokas-Lenells equation. The symmetry reduction has been applied to clarify the soliton solution of time-fractional KdV and K(m, n) equations by Wang et al. [23,24]. The Harry-Dym equation with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative has been studied by Huang et al. [25]. Garrido et al. [26] suggested Lie point symmetry along with traveling wave solution to generalized Drinfeld-Sokolov system; Bokhari et al. [27] illustrated fundamentals of symmetries to time-fractional tumour growth in the brain. Liu et al. [28] and Singla et al. [29] declared that the Lie symmetry reduction is a robust and authentic technique to solve higher-order nonlinear systems. The extensive use of Erdelyi–Kober fractional operators to help convert FPDEs into fractional ODEs has been stated by Sneddon [30]. Balsar et al. [31] attempted the sum ability of the series solution of PDEs with constant coefficients. Using the same technique, Shi et al. [32] and Razborova et al. [33] explained the additional conservation laws and exact solution to Boussinesq-Burgers system and Rosenau-KdV-RLW equation. The study of diffusion and sub-diffusion wave equations with conservation laws has been concluded by Lukashuk et al. [34]. Anco et al. [35] focused on the direct construction of conservation laws of linear and nonlinear PDEs. The nonlinear self-adjointness to the time-fractional Kompaneets equation has been studied by Gazizov et al. [36]. In addition, recently, Gandhi et al. [37] focused on invariant analysis, exact series solution and the convergence of solution by implicit theorem on fractional-order Hirota-Satsuma Coupled KdV system. A comparative study for solving Laplace fractional equation has been produced by Dubey et al. [38]. Chatibi et al. [39] have done the discrete symmetry analysis of some global and local systems. The invariant solution of generalized fractional order (2+1)-dimensional Date-Jimbo-Kashiwara-Miwa equation has been evaluated by Chauhan et al. [40]. Gandarias et al. [41] have discussed the conservation laws and travelling wave solutions for double dispersion equations in (1+1) and (2+1) dimensions. Bruzon et al. [42] found a similarity solution of the Cooper-Shepard-Sodano equation along with the utilization of conservation analysis. The work of Edwards [45], Antim et al. [50], Hussain et al. [51,52], and Faridi et al. [53,54,55,56] is worth mentioning in this context.
In this paper, we examine the nonlinear time fractional convection-diffusion equation given by
∂βtv=D(v)vxx+D′(v)(vx)2+C(v)vx, | (1) |
where 0<β<1 and v(x,t) represents the density of particles, D(v) is a dispersion or diffusive term, and C(v) is a conductive or convective term; both D(v) and C(v) are non-zero terms. We have considered a special case of conduction-dispersion phenomenon when D(v) = 4v3 and C(v) = 3v2 in Eq (1), which is known as Buckmaster Model (BM) and it is extremely effective and relevant to explore the propagation of sound, electricity, and electrodynamics in physical systems. We know that buckling is the process of uncertainty that originates in thin materials due to pressure exceeding and making the material bend out of the plane. The BM equation (1) is also meant for dynamical modeling of thin sheet fluid flows to draw buckling, suggested by Buckmaster [43].
The nonlinear convection-diffusion equations have a great contribution to the model of the evolution of thermal waves in plasma by Rosenau and Kamin [44]. Movement is caused within a fluid by the propensity of hotter or less dense material to become colder, denser material to sink under the impact of gravity, which in consequence shows in the transfer of heat is called convection. The action of distributing matter by the natural movement of particles is called diffusion. The classical nonlinear convection-diffusion equation is given by Edward [45].
Our research article is organized as some basic definitions in Section 2, Lie symmetry methodology algorithm for BM is explained in part 3, and infinitesimal generators have been deduced using symmetry reduction in Section 4, followed by reduction of FPDEs into FODEs with the utilization of Erdelyi-Kober operators in Section 5, the power series solutions of respective FODE of BM and their convergence have been studied in subsequent Sections 6 and 7, respectively, and finally conservation laws have been defined in Section 8, which impart great information about physical BM system.
In this section, we provided an overview of the fundamental concepts surrounding fractional derivatives and integrals. Various definitions exist for fractional derivatives, including the Grunwald-Letnikov (GL), Riemann-Liouville (RL), and Caputo formulations. Each of these definitions offers unique advantages and occasional drawbacks, depending on the circumstances. However, our focus lies on utilizing the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative to investigate symmetry reduction and attain exact solutions for Fractional Partial Differential Equations (FPDEs). Below, we present some essential definitions necessary for our exploration:
Definition 2.1. The R-L fractional partial derivative of order 'β > 0' for arbitrary function v(x, t) with time variable 't' is given as
Dtβ(u(x,t))={1Γ(m−β)∂m∂tmt∫0(t−ξ)m−β−1v(ξ,x)dξ;form−1<β<m,t>0,m∈N,∂mu∂tm;forβ=m.. | (2) |
Definition 2.2. The R-L integral of fractional order 'β > 0'and '0 < t < T' is defined as
0Jβtg(t,x)=1Γ(β)∫t0(t−ξ)β−1g(ξ,x)dξ; | (3) |
tJβTg(t,x)=1Γ(β)∫Tt(t−ξ)β−1g(ξ,x)dξ, | (4) |
Some important results associated with the above operators and used in this paper are:
Dβt(tα)=Γ(α+1)Γ(α−β+1)tα−β; | (5) |
Jβt(tα)=Γ(α+1)Γ(α+β+1)tα+β; | (6) |
Jβt(Dβt(φ(t))=φ(t)−λ−1∑k=0φ(k)(0)k!tk;λ−1<β⩽λ; | (7) |
Dβt(g(t))=DntJn−βt(g(t));n−1<β⩽n. | (8) |
In this section, we give a summary of the Lie symmetry analysis for fractional partial differential equations (FPDEs) given by:
∂βtv=F(x,t,v,vx,vxx,...);β∈(0,1). | (9) |
In one-parameter Lie group of transformations, the infinitesimals are to be determined in such a way that the PDE (9) is invariant under the group of transformations; the entity 'ε' is a small parameter such that its square and higher powers may be neglected. The existence of such a group reduces the number of independent variables by one, which allows us to replace the PDE by an ODE and it adheres to the following condition:
¯t=t+ετ(v;x,t)+O(ε2);¯x=x+εξ(v;x,t)+O(ε2);¯v=v+εη(v;x,t)+O(ε2);∂βtˉv=∂βtv+εηβ,t(v;x,t)+O(ε2);∂1tˉv=∂1tv+εηx(v;x,t)+O(ε2);∂2tˉv=∂2tv+εηxx(v;x,t)+O(ε2), | (10) |
where τ, ξ and η are required infinitesimals ηx, ηxx are extended infinitesimals and ηβ, t is extended infinitesimal of fractional parameter of order 'β' associated to Lie algebra of (9) is spanned by vector fields
X=η∂∂v+ξ∂∂x+τ∂∂twithτ=dˉtdε|ε=0,ξ=dˉxdε|ε=0, and η=dˉvdε|ε=0. | (11) |
Prolongation to (9) carried
pr(β,2)(∂βtv−F)|Δ=0=0, | (12) |
where prolongation operator is defined by
pr(β,2)=X+ηβ,t∂∂(∂βtv)+ηx∂∂vx+ηxx∂∂vxx. | (13) |
The expressions for extended infinitesimals are given as
ηx=Dx(η)−vtDx(τ)−vxDx(ξ)=ηx−(ξx−ηv)vx−vtτx−ξvv2x−τvvtvx, | (14) |
ηxx=Dx(ηx)−vxtDx(τ)−vxxDx(ξ)=ηxx−(ξxv−2ηxv)vx−τxxvt+(ηvv−2ξxv)vx2−2τxvvxvt−ξvvvx3−τvxvx2vt−2τxvxt+(ηv−2ξx)vxx−τvvxxvt−2τvvxtvx−3ξvvxvxx. | (15) |
Dβt(η)=∂βtη+ηv∂βtv−v∂βtηv+∞∑m=1(βn)∂nt(ηv)∂β−nt(v)+μ, | (16) |
where
μ=∞∑λ=2λ∑n=2n∑k=2k−1∑r=0(βλ)(λn)(kr)tλ−β(−v)rΓ(k+1)Γ(λ+1−β)∂n(vk−r)∂tn∂λ−n+kη∂tλ−n∂vk. | (17) |
As 'η' is linear function of 'v' then μ→0
ηβ,t=Dβt(η)+ξDβt(vx)−Dβt(ξvx)+Dβt(v.Dt(τ))−Dβ+1t(τv)+τDβ+1tv=∂βt(η)+(ηv−αDtτ)∂βt(v)−v∂βt(ηv)+∞∑λ=1[(βλ)∂nt(ηv)−(βλ+1)Dλt(ξ)∂β−λt(v)]∂β−λt−∞∑λ=1(βλ)Dλt(ξ)∂β−λt(vx)+μ. | (18) |
Finally, we use Eqs (13)–(18) in prolonged Eq (12), split the coefficients of vx and vxx and equate to zero; subsequently, we proceed to solve the system of fractional PDEs and ODEs derived from the process.
Applying Lie symmetry method on BM (1), using Lie symmetry analysis to obtain following set of PDEs
∞∑λ=1[(βλ)∂λt(ηv)−(βλ+1)Dλt(ξ)∂β−λt(v)]=0; | (19) |
∞∑λ=1(βλ)Dλt(ξ)=0; | (20) |
τx=0,τv=0:ηvv=0,ηvx=0;ξv=0,ξt=0; | (21) |
(24v)η+(12v2)(ηv−2ξx+βτt)=0; | (22) |
(3v2)(ξx−βτt)−(6v)η−24v2ηx−4v3.(2ηvx−ξxx)=0; | (23) |
(4v3)(2ξx−βτt)−(12v2)η=0. | (24) |
In order to solve set of Eqs (19)–(24), infinitesimals in explicit form with arbitrary constants 'p' and 'q' are given by
ξ=px+q,τ=−pβt, and η=pv. | (25) |
Infinitesimal generators are described as
S1=∂∂xandS2=x∂∂x−tβ∂∂t+v∂∂v. | (26) |
The set {S1, S2} forms Lie Algebra of obtained infinitesimal generators with the Lie braces operator [X,Y]=XY−YX as we have explained in all above cases. The characteristic equation for S2 is
dxx=βdt−t=−dvv. | (27) |
Solving Eq (27), we obtain similarity transformation
ζ=xtβandv=t−βJ(ζ). | (28) |
Related FODE with time fractional conduction-diffusion Buckmaster equation is
∂βv∂tβ=t−2β[4(J(ζ))3(J″(ζ))+12(J(ζ)2)(J′(ζ))2+3(J(ζ))2J′(ζ)]. | (29) |
Here, we illustrate the relevance of Erdelyi-Kober fractional differential and integral operators in solving FODEs. Before calculations of reduction of fractional operator ∂βv∂tβ, let us define the Erdelyi-Kober operators as
(E∂τ,βJ)(ζ)=n−1∏k=0(τ+k−1∂ζddζ)(K∂τ+β,n−βJ)(ζ);(K∂τ,βJ)(ζ)={1Γ(β)∞∫1(w−1)β−1w−(τ+β)g(ζw1/∂)dw,β>0;J(ζ),β=0;withz>0,∂>0andβ>0;andn={[β]+1,β∉N;β,otherwise. | (30) |
Theorem. Under the similarity transformations (28) for vector field X2, the reduced FODE (29) is
∂βv∂tβ=4(J(ζ))3(J″(z)+12(J(ζ))2(J′(ζ))2+3(J(ζ))2J′(ζ). |
Now we will solve left hand side ∂βu∂tβ with the application of E-K operator.
Riemann Liouville derivative for similarity reduction is
Dβtv=Dλt(1Γ(λ−β)t∫0(t−s)λ−β−1s−βJ(xsβ)ds). | (31) |
Substituting s=tγ in (31), it reduces to
Dβtv=Dλt(1Γ(λ−β)∞∫1(t−tγ)λ−β−1(tγ)−βJ(x(t/γ)β)tγ2dv),=Dλt(tλ−2βΓ(λ−β)∞∫1(γ−1)λ−β−1γ−(λ+1−2β)J(ζγ−β)dγ). | (32) |
Using Eq (31), we obtain
Dβtv=Dλt(tλ−2β[(K1−β,λ−β−1/βJ)(ζ)]),ifζ=xt−β,J∈C′(0,∞)tDtJ(ζ)=tx(−β)t−β−1DζJ(ζ)=−βζDζJ(ζ), | (33) |
Dβtv=Dλ−1tDt(tλ−2β[(K1−β,λ−β−1/βJ)(ζ)])=Dλ−1t(tλ−2β−1(λ−2β+βζDζ)[(K1−β,λ−β−1/βJ)(ζ)]). | (34) |
Reconsider similar arguments (λ-1) times, to get
Dβtv=t−2βλ−1Πj=0(1+j−2β+βζDζ)(K1−β,λ−β−1/βJ)(ζ)=t−2β(P1−2β,β−1/βJ)(ζ). | (35) |
Finally, FODE becomes
(P1−2β,β−1/βJ)(ζ)=[4(J(ζ))3J″(ζ)+12(J(ζ))2(J′(ζ))2+3(J(ζ))2J′(ζ)]. | (36) |
Now, for further solution of FODEs, we want to explore the explicit power series solution [11,12], which can be applied to solve FODE (36).
Set power series
J(ζ)=∞∑n=0anζn, | (37) |
substituting (37) in (36), it yields
∞∑n=0Γ(2−β−nβ)Γ(3−2β−nβ).an.ζn=4∞∑n=0n∑k=ok∑i=0i∑j=0(n+2−k).(n+1−k)aiak−iai−jan+2−k.ζn+12∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0(n+1−k)2.aiak−ia2n+1−k.ζn+3∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0(n−k+1).aiak−ian+k+1ζn. | (38) |
Put n = 0 in (24) and comparing coefficients of ζn, we get
a2=−18a30((1−2β)Γ(2−β)Γ(3−2β)a0−12a02.a12−3a02a1),a0anda1≠0. |
an+2=1(n+1)(n+2)(4an3)((1−2β+nβ)Γ(2−(n+1)β)Γ(3−(n+2)β)an−12∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0(i+1−k)(i+1)aiak−ia2n+1−k−3∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0(i+1−k).aiak−ian+1−k). |
As
J(ζ)=a0+a1(ζ)+a2(ζ)2+∞∑n=1an+2(ζ)n+2, |
v(x,t)=a0+a1xt−α/3+a2x2t−2α/3+∞∑n=1an+2xn+2t−(n+2)α/3. | (39) |
Hence, we found the exact power series solution (39).
Now, we are expecting the convergence of solution of BM, so an+2 in Eq (38) taken as
|an+2|⩽1|d|(|(1−2β+nβ)Γ(2−(n+2)β)Γ(3−(2+n)β)||an|+12∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0|ai||ak−i||a2n+1−k|+3∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0|ai||an+1−k||ak−i|). | (40) |
We can find |(1−2β+nβ)Γ(2−(n−1)β)Γ(2−2β+nβ)|<1, for large arbitrary value of n.
|an+2|⩽M(|an|+∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0|ai||a2n+1−k||ak−i|+∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0|ai||ak−i||an+1−k|); | (41) |
where M=greatest{1|d|,12|d|,3|d|}.
Introduce another majorant series
G(ζ)=∞∑n=0cnζn;ci=|ai|,i=0,1,2,3..., | (42) |
where
cn+3=M(cn+∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0cick−ic2n+1−k.+∞∑n=0n∑k=0k∑i=0cick−icn+1−k). | (43) |
It can be observed that |an|≤cn,n=0,1,2….
Further, the series function G (ζ) has non-negative convergence radius and it presents
G(ζ)=c0+c1ζ+c2ζ2+M∞∑n=1(cn+n∑k=0k∑i=0cick−icn+1−k2+n∑k=0k∑i=0cick−icn−k+1)ζn+2. | (44) |
Now, the implicit function system is defined with the variable ζ.
I(ζ,G)=G−c0−c1ζ−c2ζ2−M∞∑n=1(cn+n∑k=0k∑i=0cick−icn+1−k2+n∑k=0k∑i=0cick−icn−k+1)ζn+2. | (45) |
As I (ζ, G) is regular in vicinity of (0, c0) and I(0, c0) = 0 with ∂∂GI(0,c0)≠0, by implicit function theorem explained in Rudin [46]. We observed that G (ζ) is regular in the vicinity of the point (0, c0) and have real positive radius; the series solution (39) converges in the vicinity of the point (0, c0).
In the physical and mathematical vision, conservation laws play a key role in the analysis of time-fractional PDEs. To obtain the conservation laws of convection-diffusion BM, we are generalizing the Noether's theorem suggested by Ibragimov [47,48] and Bourdin et al. [49]. The applications of conservation laws in FPDEs are almost the same as the application of these laws in classical order PDEs. These conservation laws can be extended from PDEs to FDEs. Let us define a conserved vector for BM (2), where λt and λx are components of vector
λ=(λt,λx), | (46) |
which satisfy the continuity or conservation equation given by
Dt(λt)+Dx(λx)|Δ=0=0. | (47) |
A formal Lagrangian form with 'u' as a new independent variable described as
ℓ=u[∂βtv−4v3vxx−12v2vx2−3v2vx], | (48) |
where δ/δv is Euler-Lagrangian operator, is defined as
δδv=∂∂v+(Dβt)∗∂∂(Dβtv)+∞∑k=1(−1)kDi1Di2...Dik∂∂vi1,i2,i3...ik, | (49) |
where (Dβt)∗ is adjoint of R-L fractional differential operator (Dβt).
Adjoint equation of (1), is given by
(Dβt)∗=(−1)ntJn−βT(Dnt)=ctDβT;Δ∗=δℓδv=0, | (50) |
where tJn−βT is right-handed fractional integral of order (n-β) and ctDβT is Caputo right-handed derivative operator of fractional order β.
The idea of the physical property of self-adjointness for establishing these laws has been discussed in [36] and this concept can also be applied and expanded to fractional PDEs. The time fractional convection-diffusion equation will be self-adjoint if the adjoint Eq (50) is well pleased for the obtained solution of model (1).
For further discussion, the basic Noether expression is defined as
ˉX+Dt(τ)+Dx(ξ)=Wδδv+Dt(Nt)+Dx(Nx), | (51) |
where Nt and Nx are noether operators. As Nx in (1) does not have the non-integer or fractional derivatives with variable 'x', so the general expression is
Nx=ξℓ+W(∂∂vx−Dx∂∂vxx)+Dx(W)(∂∂vxx), | (52) |
and Nt involves fractional derivative, so this can be expressed by RL derivatives as
Nt=ℓτ+n−1∑j=0(−1)jDjt∂∂(Dβtv)Dβ−1−jt(W)−(−1)nI(W,Dnt∂∂(Dβtv)), | (53) |
In Eq (51), ˉX represents the prolongation of symmetry reduction with characteristics of the vector field W = η–τvt–ξvx, and operator I in (53) is described as
I(g,f)=1Γ(n−β)t∫0∫Ttg(τ,x)f(μ,x)(μ−τ)dμdτ. | (54) |
Applying Lagrangian operator 'ℓ' on (51) for any vector X of (1), we obtained
ˉXℓ+Dt(τ)ℓ+Dx(ξ)ℓ|Δ=0=0alsoδℓδv=0. | (55) |
Thus, we obtained the conservation law of (1)
Dt(Ntℓ)+Dx(Nxℓ)=0. | (56) |
The components λt and λx of conserved vector fields in (30) can be expressed by
λt=Ntℓ=τℓ+m−1∑j=0(−1)jDjt∂ℓ∂(Dβtv)Dβ−1−jt(W)−(−1)mI(W,Dmt∂ℓ∂(Dβtv)),λx=Nxℓ=ξℓ+W(∂ℓ∂vx−Dx∂ℓ∂vxx)+Dx(W)(∂ℓ∂vxx). | (57) |
The adjoint equation for (1) is found as
Δ∗=Dβ∗t(v)−12uv2vxx−24uvv2x−6uvvx+Dx(24uv2vx)+Dx(3uv2)−D2x(4uv3)=Dβ∗t(v)+3uxv2−4uxxv3=0. | (58) |
If adjoint Eq (58) is satisfied for all solutions of (1), is said to be nonlinear self-adjoint. It shows
Dβ∗t(v)+3uxv2−4uxxv3=λ[∂βtv−4v3vxx−12v2v2x−3v2vx]. | (59) |
Substituting u=ψ(t,x)=ω(t)ρ(x)≠0 represents the nonlinear self adjointness of (1). By using the above (59), we obtain
Dβ∗t(ω(t))=ctDβ∗t(ω(t))=0,3ρx(x)v2−4ρxx(x)v3=0. |
Which implies that v=ψ(t,x)=C, C is arbitrary constant.
Thus, the Lagrangian operator for (1) is ℓ=C[∂βtv−4v3vxx−12v2vx2−3v2vx]. Now, we proceed with the calculation of conservation laws of BM using (57).
Case1. For 0⩽β<1,S1=∂∂x, the Lie characteristic is W1=−vx, so the components of conserved vectors are as follows:
λx=ξℓ+W1(−Dx∂∂vxx+∂∂vx)ℓ+Dx(W1)(∂ℓ∂vxx)=(24c.v2vx+3c.v2−4cDx(v3))vx−Dx(vx)(−4cv3)=c.v2(3vx+12vx2+4vvxx), | (60) |
λt=c.Dβ−1t(−vx)+I(−vx,0)=−c.Dβ−1t(vx). | (61) |
Case2. For S2=x∂∂x−tβ∂∂t+v∂∂v the Lie characteristic is W2=v−tβvt+xvx, so the components of conserved vectors are as follows:
λx=ξℓ+W2(−Dx∂∂vxx+∂∂vx)ℓ+Dx(W2)(∂ℓ∂vxx)=(v+tβvt−xvx)(−24cv2vx−3cv2−Dx(−4cv3))−4cv3Dx(u+tβvt−xvx)=−3cv2(4vx+1)(v+tβvt−xvx)−4cv3(vx−tβvtx−vx−xvxx), | (62) |
λt=n−1∑k=0(−1)kDkt∂ℓ∂(Dβtv)Dβ−1−kt(W2)−(−1)nI(W2,Dnt∂ℓ∂(Dβtv))=cDβ−1t(v+tβvt−xvx)+I(v+tβvt−xvx,0)=cDβ−1t(v+tβvt−xvx) | (63) |
In the article, we have utilized the symmetry reduction to fractional-order convection-diffusion Buckmaster model. The Lie point infinitesimal generators and Lie algebra have been constructed. Also, Erdelyi-Kober operators are used to transforming the fractional-PDE into fractional-ODE. Finally, the power series solutions of the model are obtained with their convergence the implicit function theorem. To construct the conservation laws of the model, Ibragimov's method and Noether's theorem have been used. The study of the obtained solutions with conservation laws is supposed to be very useful in the future for various stream of physical and applied sciences.
A. Tomar: Conceptualization, Supervision, Formal analysis, Writing-original draft, Writing review editing; H. Kumar: Conceptualization, Software, Visualization, Writing original draft; M. Ali: Formal analysis, Writing-review, editing; H. Gandhi: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing-original draft, Visualization; D. Singh: Formal analysis, Supervision, Formatting, Writing review; G. Pathak: Software, Formal analysis, Visualization. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, the Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Grant A295).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, Academic Press, 1999. |
[2] | K. B. Oldham, J. Spaniel, The fractional calculus: theory and applications of differentiation and integration to arbitrary order, Academic press, 1974. |
[3] |
L. Debnath, Recent applications of fractional calculus to science and engineering, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 54 (2003), 753601. https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171203301486 doi: 10.1155/S0161171203301486
![]() |
[4] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, Vol. 204, 2006. |
[5] |
A. M. Wazwaz, Exact solutions for the ZK-MEW Equation by using the tanh and sine-cosine Methods, Int. J. Comput. Math., 82 (2005), 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160512331329069 doi: 10.1080/00207160512331329069
![]() |
[6] |
A. M. Wazwaz, The variational iteration method for solving linear and nonlinear systems of PDEs, J. Comput. Math. Appl., 54 (2007), 895–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.059 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.059
![]() |
[7] |
L. Lin, S. Zhu, Y. Xu, Y. Shi, Exact solutions of Gardner equations through tanh-coth method, Appl. Math., 7 (2016), 2374–2381. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.718186 doi: 10.4236/am.2016.718186
![]() |
[8] |
O. S. Iyiola, O. G. Olyinka, Analytical solutions of time fractional models for homogeneous Gardner equation and non-homogeneous differential equations, Ain Shams Eng. J., 5 (2014), 2090–4479. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASEJ.2014.03.014 doi: 10.1016/J.ASEJ.2014.03.014
![]() |
[9] |
O. S. Iyiola, F. D. Zaman, A fractional diffusion equation model for cancer tumor, AIP Adv., 4 (2014), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4898331 doi: 10.1063/1.4898331
![]() |
[10] |
H. Jafari, M. Nazarib, D. Baleanuc, C. M. Khaliquea, A new approach for solving a system of fractional partial differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 66 (2013), 838–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.11.014 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.11.014
![]() |
[11] |
H. Gandhi, D. Singh, A. Tomar, Explicit solution of general fourth order time fractional KdV equation by Lie symmetry analysis, AIP Conf. Proc., 2253 (2020), 020012. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0019077 doi: 10.1063/5.0019077
![]() |
[12] | H. Gandhi, D. Singh, A. Tomar, Lie symmetry analysis to general fifth order time fractional Korteweg-de-Vries equation and its explicit solution, In: P. Singh, R. K. Gupta, K. Ray, A. Bandyopadhyay, Proceedings of International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Singapore: Springer, 1169 (2020), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5414-8_16 |
[13] | H. Gandhi, A. Tomar, D. Singh, A predicted mathematical cancer tumor growth model of brain and its analytical solution by reduced differential transform method, In: P. Singh, R. K. Gupta, K. Ray, A. Bandyopadhyay, Proceedings of International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Singapore: Springer, 1169 (2020), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5414-8_17 |
[14] | H. Gandhi, A. Tomar, D. Singh, The study of linear and nonlinear fractional ODEs by homotopy analysis, In: T. K. Sharma, C. W. Ahn, O. P. Verma, B. K. Panigrahi, Soft Computing: Theories and Applications, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Singapore: Springer, 1380 (2021), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1740-9_33 |
[15] | H. Gandhi, D. Singh, A. Tomar, The comparative study of time fractional linear and nonlinear Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, In: T. K. Sharma, C. W. Ahn, O. P. Verma, B. K. Panigrahi, Soft Computing: Theories and Applications, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Singapore: Springer, 1380 (2021), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1740-9_34 |
[16] | P. J. Olver, Application of Lie group symmetries to differential equations, Graduated Textin Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 107, 2002. |
[17] |
T. Bakkyaraj, R. Sahadevan, Group formalism of Lie transformations to time fractional partial differential equations, Pramana-J. Phys., 85 (2015), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1103-8 doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-1103-8
![]() |
[18] | S. Moyo, P. G. L. Leach, Symmetry method applied to a mathematical model of a tumor of brain, Proceedings of Institute of NAS of Ukraine, 50 (2004), 204–210. |
[19] |
Y. Zhang, Lie symmetry analysis to general time fractional Korteweg-de-Varies equation, Fract. Differ. Calc., 5 (2013), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.7153/fdc-05-11 doi: 10.7153/fdc-05-11
![]() |
[20] | A. Biswas, M. Song, H. Triki, A. H. Kara, B. S. Ahmad, A. Strong, et al., Solitons, shock waves, conservation laws and bifurcation analysis of Boussinesq equation with power law non linearity and dual dispersion, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 3 (2014), 949–957. |
[21] |
A. Biswas, C. M. Khalique, Optical quasi-solitons by Lie symmetry analysis, J. King Saud Univ.-Sci., 24 (2012), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2011.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2011.05.003
![]() |
[22] | A. Bansal, A. H. Kara, A. Biswas, S. P. Moshokoa, M. Belić, Optical soliton perturbation, group invariants and conservation laws of perturbed Fokas-Lenells equation, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 114 (2018), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHAOS.2018.06.030 |
[23] |
G. Wang, T. Xu, Symmetry properties and explicit solutions of the non-linear time fractional KdV equation, Bound. Value Probl., 2013 (2013), 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-232 doi: 10.1186/1687-2770-2013-232
![]() |
[24] | G. W. Wang, M. S. Hashemi, Lie symmetry analysis and soliton solutions of time fractional K(m, n) equation, Pramana-J. Phys., 88 (2017), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-016-1320-9 |
[25] |
Q. Huang, R. Zhdanov, Symmetries and exact solutions of the time fractional Harry-Dym equation with Riemann-Liouville derivative, Phys. A, 409 (2014), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSA.2014.04.043 doi: 10.1016/J.PHYSA.2014.04.043
![]() |
[26] |
T. M. Garrido, M. S. Bruzón, Lie point symmetries and travelling wave solutions for the generalized Drinfeld-Sokolov system, J. Comput. Theor. Trans., 45 (2016), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/23324309.2016.1164720 doi: 10.1080/23324309.2016.1164720
![]() |
[27] |
A. H. Bokhari, A. H. Kara, F. D. Zaman, On the solutions and conservation laws of model for tumor growth in the Brain, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 350 (2009), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAA.2008.09.065 doi: 10.1016/J.JMAA.2008.09.065
![]() |
[28] | H. Liu, J. Li, L. Liu, Lie symmetry analysis, optimal systems and exact solution to fifth order KdV types of equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 368 (2010), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.03.026 |
[29] |
K. Singla, R. K. Gupta, On invariant analysis of some time fractional non-linear systems of partial differential equations, J. Math. Phys., 57 (2016), 101504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4964937 doi: 10.1063/1.4964937
![]() |
[30] | I. N. Sneddon, The use in mathematical physics of Erdélyi-Kober operators and some of their generalizations, In: B. Ross, Fractional calculus and its applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, 457 (1975), 37–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0067097 |
[31] |
W. Balser, Multisummability of formal power series solutions of partial differential equations with constant coefficients, J. Differ. Equations, 201 (2004), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDE.2004.02.002 doi: 10.1016/J.JDE.2004.02.002
![]() |
[32] |
D. Shi, Y. Zhang, W. Liu, J. Liu, Some exact solutions and conservation laws of the coupled time fractional Boussinesq-Burgers system, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11010077 doi: 10.3390/sym11010077
![]() |
[33] |
P. Razborova, A. H. Kara, A. Biswas, Additional conservation laws for Rosenau-KdVRLW equation with power law nonlinearity by Lie symmetry, Nonlinear Dyn., 79 (2015), 743–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1700-y doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1700-y
![]() |
[34] |
S. Y. Lukaschuk, Conservation laws for time fractional sub diffusion and diffusion wave equations, Nonlinear Dyn., 80 (2015), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-1906-7 doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-1906-7
![]() |
[35] |
S. C. Anco, G. Bluman, Direct construction method for conservation laws of partial differential equations Part I: examples of conservation law classifications, Eur. J. Appl. Math., 13 (2002), 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095679250100465X doi: 10.1017/S095679250100465X
![]() |
[36] | R. K. Gazizov, N. H. Ibragimov, S. Y. Lukashchuk, Nonlinear self-adjointness, conservation laws and exact solutions of time-fractional Kompaneets equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Number. Simul., 23 (2015), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CNSNS.2014.11.010 |
[37] |
H. Gandhi, A. Tomar, D. Singh, Conservation laws and exact series solution of fractional order Hirota-Satsoma coupled Korteveg-de-Vries system by symmetry analysis, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 14356–14370. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7701 doi: 10.1002/mma.7701
![]() |
[38] |
V. P. Dubey, J. Singh, A. M Alshehri, S. Dubey, D. Kumar, A comparative analysis of schemes for solving local fractional Laplace equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 13540–13559. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7642 doi: 10.1002/mma.7642
![]() |
[39] |
Y. Chatibi, E. E. Kinani, A. Ouhadan, On the discrete symmetry analysis of some classical and fractional differential equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2020), 2868–2878. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6064 doi: 10.1002/mma.6064
![]() |
[40] | A. Chauhan, K. Sharma, R. Arora, Lie symmetry analysis, optimal system, and generalized group invariant solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional Date-Jimbo-Kashiwara-Miwa equation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 8823–8840. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6547 |
[41] | M. L. Gandarias, M. R. Durán, C. M. Khalique, Conservation laws and travelling wave solutions for double dispersion equations in (1+1) and (2+1) dimensions, Symmetry, 12 (2020) 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060950 |
[42] | M. S. Bruzón, E. Recio, T. M. Garrido, A. P. Márquez, R. de la Rosa, On the similarity solutions and conservation laws of the Cooper-Shepard-Sodano equation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 41 (2017), 7325–7332. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4829 |
[43] |
J. D. Buckmaster, A. Nachman, L. Ting, The Buckling and Stretching of a Viscida, J. Fluid Mech., 69 (1975), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075001279 doi: 10.1017/S0022112075001279
![]() |
[44] |
P. Rosenau, S. Kamin, Thermal waves in an absorbing and convective medium, Phys. D, 8 (1983), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(83)90325-1 doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(83)90325-1
![]() |
[45] |
M. P. Edwards, Classical symmetry reductions of nonlinear diffusion-convection equations, Phys. Lett. A, 190 (1994), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(94)90068-X doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(94)90068-X
![]() |
[46] | W. Rudin, Principles of mathematical analysis, Beijing: China Machine Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3608793 |
[47] |
N. H. Ibragimov, Nonlinear self-adjointness in constructing conservation laws, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 44 (2011), 432002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/43/432002 doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/43/432002
![]() |
[48] | N. H. Ibragimov, A new conservation theorem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 333 (2007), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAA.2006.10.078 |
[49] |
L. Bourdin, J. Cresson, I. Greff, A continuous/discrete fractional Noether's theorem, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Number. Simul., 18 (2013), 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.09.003
![]() |
[50] |
A. Chauhan, R. Arora, A. Tomar, Lie symmetry analysis and traveling wave solutions of equal width wave equation, Proyecciones (Antofagasta), 39 (2000), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0717-6279-2020-01-0012 doi: 10.22199/issn.0717-6279-2020-01-0012
![]() |
[51] | A. Hussain, M. K. Zia, K. S. Nisar, V. Vijayakumar, I. Khan, Lie analysis, conserved vectors, nonlinear self-adjoint classification and exact solutions of generalized N+1-dimensional nonlinear Boussinesq equation, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 13139–13168. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022725 |
[52] | A. Hussain, A. Anjum, M. Junaid-U-Rehman, I. Khan, M. A. Sameh, A. S. Al-Johani, Symmetries, optimal system, exact and soliton solutions of (3+1)-dimensional Gardner-KP equation, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 9 (2024), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.04.035 |
[53] | W. A. Faridi, S. A. Al Qahtani, The explicit power series solution formation and computation of Lie point infinitesimals generators: Lie symmetry approach, Phys. Scr., 98 (2023), 125249. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad0948 |
[54] | W. A. Faridi, A. Yusuf, A Akgül, F. M. Tawfiq, F. Tchier, R. Al-deiakeh, et al., The computation of Lie point symmetry generators, modulational instability, classification of conserved quantities, and explicit power series solutions of the coupled system, Results Phys., 54 (2023), 107126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107126 |
[55] |
W. A. Faridi, Z. Myrzakulova, R. Myrzakulov, A. Akgül, M. S. Osman, The construction of exact solution and explicit propagating optical soliton waves of Kuralay equation by the new extended direct algebraic and Nucci's reduction techniques, Int. J. Modelling Simul., 2024, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2024.2315278 doi: 10.1080/02286203.2024.2315278
![]() |
[56] |
W. A. Faridi, A. M. Wazwaz, A. Mostafa, R. Myrzakulov, Z. Umurzakhova, The Lie point symmetry criteria and formation of exact analytical solutions for Kairat-Ⅱ equation: Paul-Painlevé approach, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 182 (2024), 114745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114745 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114745
![]() |