In the realm of double-controlled metric-type spaces, we investigated obtaining fixed points using the application of cyclic orbital contractive conditions. Diverging from conventional approaches utilized in standard metric spaces, our technique took a unique route due to the unique features of our structure. We demonstrated the significance of our outcomes through exemplary cases, clarifying the breadth of our results through comprehensive investigations. Significantly, our work not only improved and broadened earlier findings in the literature, but also offered unique notions that were discussed in our explanatory notes. Towards the end of our inquiry, we used insights obtained from previous discoveries to develop a second-order differential equation. This equation was an effective tool for dealing with the second class of Fredholm integral problems. In conclusion, this investigation extended our examination of double-controlled metric type spaces by providing new insights on fixed point theory, expanding on prior debates and building a substantial road towards solving a class of integral equations.
Citation: Haroon Ahmad, Sana Shahab, Wael F. M. Mobarak, Ashit Kumar Dutta, Yasser M. Abolelmagd, Zaffar Ahmed Shaikh, Mohd Anjum. Convergence results for cyclic-orbital contraction in a more generalized setting with application[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15543-15558. doi: 10.3934/math.2024751
[1] | Xiaosheng Li . New Einstein-Randers metrics on certain homogeneous manifolds arising from the generalized Wallach spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23062-23086. doi: 10.3934/math.20231174 |
[2] | Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey, Meraj Ali Khan, Amna Salim Rashid Al Kaabi . N(κ)-paracontact metric manifolds admitting the Fischer-Marsden conjecture. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 2232-2243. doi: 10.3934/math.2024111 |
[3] | Shahroud Azami, Mehdi Jafari, Nargis Jamal, Abdul Haseeb . Hyperbolic Ricci solitons on perfect fluid spacetimes. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18929-18943. doi: 10.3934/math.2024921 |
[4] | Richa Agarwal, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sarvesh Kumar Yadav, Shahid Ali, Abdul Haseeb . On Riemannian warped-twisted product submersions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2925-2937. doi: 10.3934/math.2024144 |
[5] | Esmail Hassan Abdullatif Al-Sabri, Muhammad Rahim, Fazli Amin, Rashad Ismail, Salma Khan, Agaeb Mahal Alanzi, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa . Multi-criteria decision-making based on Pythagorean cubic fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators for investment management. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16961-16988. doi: 10.3934/math.2023866 |
[6] | Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Mohammad Shuaib, Sharief Deshmukh, Tanveer Fatima . ϕ-pluriharmonicity in quasi bi-slant conformal ξ⊥-submersions: a comprehensive study. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21746-21768. doi: 10.3934/math.20231109 |
[7] | Tong Wu, Yong Wang . Super warped products with a semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10534-10553. doi: 10.3934/math.2022587 |
[8] | Adara M. Blaga, Sharief Deshmukh . Einstein solitons with unit geodesic potential vector field. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 7961-7970. doi: 10.3934/math.2021462 |
[9] | Jia-Bao Liu, Rashad Ismail, Muhammad Kamran, Esmail Hassan Abdullatif Al-Sabri, Shahzaib Ashraf, Ismail Naci Cangul . An optimization strategy with SV-neutrosophic quaternion information and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy rough Einstein aggregation operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20612-20653. doi: 10.3934/math.20231051 |
[10] | K. Tamilvanan, Jung Rye Lee, Choonkil Park . Hyers-Ulam stability of a finite variable mixed type quadratic-additive functional equation in quasi-Banach spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5993-6005. doi: 10.3934/math.2020383 |
In the realm of double-controlled metric-type spaces, we investigated obtaining fixed points using the application of cyclic orbital contractive conditions. Diverging from conventional approaches utilized in standard metric spaces, our technique took a unique route due to the unique features of our structure. We demonstrated the significance of our outcomes through exemplary cases, clarifying the breadth of our results through comprehensive investigations. Significantly, our work not only improved and broadened earlier findings in the literature, but also offered unique notions that were discussed in our explanatory notes. Towards the end of our inquiry, we used insights obtained from previous discoveries to develop a second-order differential equation. This equation was an effective tool for dealing with the second class of Fredholm integral problems. In conclusion, this investigation extended our examination of double-controlled metric type spaces by providing new insights on fixed point theory, expanding on prior debates and building a substantial road towards solving a class of integral equations.
It is noted from the literature that many topologies with important applications in mathematics have been defined using new mathematical structures, for example, filter [20], ideal [19] and partially ordered [25]. The grill is one of the classic structures presented by Choquet [11] around 1947, which is a good tool for studying topological notions and has a wide range of important applications in topological theory (see [9,10,30]). Some structures based on both "filter" and "grill" are defined and investigated, as in [22,23], while others are based on "partially ordered set" as [7]. A grill's associated topology has been defined and investigated by Roy and Mukherjee [26]. They presented the basic topological concepts in terms of this new structure and studied the fundamental theorems.
Moreover, some operators have been defined and their properties studied with clarity to determine whether they satisfy Kuratowskis closure axioms (see [27,28,29]). The notion of continuity occupies a great place of study in the wide range of literature [18,24,32].
Császár [12] established the theory of generalizations in 1997 by presenting the notion of generalized open sets. Furthermore, he introduced the generalized topological spaces (breifly GTS) around 2002 [13], which differ from topological spaces in the condition of intersection. In more specific terms, they are closed under arbitrary unions.
In [13,14,31,33], a lot of its characteristics are studied in detail, such as the generalized interior of a set A, the generalized closure of a set A, the generalized neighbourhood, separation axioms, and so on. The notion of continuity gets a lot of attention under the new appellations "generalized continuity", "θ-continuity", "γ-continuity", etc. (see [13,16]). Various kinds of generalized topology appeared and were studied, such as "extremely disconnected generalized topology", "δ- and θ-modifications generalized topology", etc. (see [15,16,33]).
The dual structure of a grill was presented around 2022. It was called "primal". This new structure has a lot of interesting properties, studied in detail by Acharjee et al. [1].
Furthermore, a new topology has been defined by using this new structure, called "primal topology" and some of its topological properties have been investigated. Some articles have appeared that study primal topological spaces in different fields, such as vector spaces induced by metric or soft environments (see [8,21]).
In 1990, [17] different kinds of topological operators were defined based on the structure "ideal". Then, other studies followed the same approach. Al-Omari and Noiri studied some types of operators based on the grill notion (see [4,5,6]). Moreover, [1,3] present types of operators have been defined by using the notion of primal with deep studies of their various properties.
In this paper, our aim is to define a new structure based on both the notions of "primal" and "generalized". This new space will be called "generalized primal topological spaces".
Also, the authors will introduce some operators based on the notion of generalized primal neighbourhood such as cl⋄(A) and Φ(A), with a study of their fundamental characteristics and give an answer to the important question, "do they satisfy Kuratowskis closure axioms?" A lot of nice properties with examples will be present.
Thereafter, we will define a new form of generalized primal topological spaces induced by the previous operators, with a comparison between the structures.
We will go over the fundamental definitions and conclusions in this section. We represent the power set of X≠ϕ by 2X throughout our work.
Definition 2.1. [11] Suppose that X≠ϕ. A collection G⊆X of 2X is named a grill if the next hold:
(i) ϕ∉G.
(ii) For two subsets A and B of X, with A⊆B, we have B∈G, if A∈G.
(iii) For two subsets A and B of X, A∈G or B∈G, if A∪B∈G.
Definition 2.2. [12] Let X≠ϕ. A family g of 2X is named a generalized topology (GT) on X if the next hold:
(i) ϕ∈g.
(ii) The countable union of Gi∈g, for i∈I≠ϕ is belongs to g.
A generalized topological space is the pair (X,g).
Remark 2.1. According to [12], we note that:
(i) This space's elements are identified as g-open and their own complements are identified as g-closed.
(ii) Cg(X) represents the set of all g-closed sets of X.
(iii) cgA represents the closure of A⊆X, which is described as the intersection of all g-closed sets that contain A.
(iv) igA represents the interior of A⊆X, which is described as the union of all g-open sets that contained in A.
(v) cg(cgA)=cgA, ig(igA)=igA and igA⊆A⊆cgA.
(vi) A is g-open if A=igA, A is g-closed if A=cgA and cgA=X∖(ig(X∖A)).
Definition 2.3. [12] In a generalized topological space (X,g). Consider an operator ψ: X→22X satisfies x∈U for U∈ψ(x). Then, U∈ψ(x) is known as a generalized neighbourhood of a point x in the space X, or briefly (GN).
Furthermore, ψ is known as a generalized neighbourhood system on a space X.
Definition 2.4. [12] The collection of all generalized neighbourhood systems on X is denoted by Ψ(X).
Definition 2.5. [1] Suppose that X≠ϕ. A family P of 2X is named a primal on X, when the next hold:
(i) X∉P.
(ii) For A,B⊆X with B⊆A. If A∈P, then B∈P.
(iii) For A,B⊆X, then A∈P or B∈P, whenever A∩B∈P.
Definition 2.6. A primal topological space is defined as the pair (X,τ) with a primal P on X. Moreover, it is represented by (X,τ,P).
Corollary 2.1. [1] Suppose that X≠ϕ. A family P of 2X is named a primal on X, if and only if the next hold:
(i) X∉P.
(ii) For A,B⊆X with B⊆A. If B∉P, then A∉P.
(iii) For A,B⊆X, then A∩B∉P, whenever A∉P and B∉P.
Theorem 2.1. [1] If the collection G forms a grill on X, then the set {A:Ac∈G} is a primal on X.
Theorem 2.2. [1] The union of two primals on X gives a primal on X.
Remark 2.2. According to [1], the intersection of two primals on X need not be a primal on X.
In this part, we establish a new category of generalized topology called "generalized primal topology" and define it as:
Definition 3.1. A generalized primal topology is a generalized topology g with a primal P on X. The triples (X,g,P) denote the generalized primal topological space.
This space's elements are identified as (g,P)-open sets, and their own complement known as (g,P)-closed sets.
C(g,P)(X) denoted the set of all (g,P)-closed sets on X, and cl(g,P)(A) represents the closure of A⊆X, which is described as the intersection of all (g,P)-closed sets that contain A.
Example 3.1. Consider X={a,b,c}, g={ϕ,{a,b},{a,c},X} and the primal set P={ϕ,{a}}. Hence, (X,g,P) is a generalized primal topological space X.
Definition 3.2. In a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P). Consider an operator ψ: X→22X satisfies x∈U for U∈ψ(x). Then, U∈ψ(x) is known as a generalized primal neighbourhood for a point x in the space X.
Remark 3.1. ψ is known as a generalized primal neighbourhood system on a space X. The collection of all generalized primal neighbourhood systems on X is denoted by Ψ(X).
Definition 3.3 In a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P). Consider an operator (.)⋄: 2X→2X defined by
A⋄(X,g,P)={x∈X:Ac∪Uc∈P,∀ U∈ψ(x)}, |
where U is a generalized primal neighbourhood of x∈X.
Remark 3.2. In a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P):
(i) We cannot say that A⋄⊆A, or A⊆A⋄ the following example shows that.
(ii) With an additional condition, the relationship A⋄⊆A is always true, which is proved in the following theorems.
Example 3.2. Consider
X={a,b,c}, g={ϕ,{a},{b},{a,b},X} |
and
P={ϕ,{a},{b},{c},{a,b}}. |
Let A={a,b}. Then, A⋄={c}. Therefore, A⋄⊈A and A⊈A⋄.
Theorem 3.1. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, A⋄⊆A, whenever Ac is (g,P)-open.
Proof. Let Ac be (g,P)-open. Let x∈A⋄ with x∉A. Then, Ac is an open generalized primal neighbourhood of x briefly (Ac∈ψ(x)) and Ac∪Uc∈P, for all U∈ψ(x). Hence,
Ac∪(Ac)c=X∈P, |
which is a contradicts with the fact that X∉P. Therefore, A⋄⊆A.
Theorem 3.2. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, we have:
(i) ϕ⋄=ϕ.
(ii) A⋄ is (g,P)-closed, for A⊆X, i.e., cl(g,P)(A⋄)=A⋄.
(iii) For A⊆X, (A⋄)⋄⊆A⋄.
(iv) A⋄⊆B⋄, whenever, A⊆B for A,B⊆X.
(v) For A,B⊆X, ⋄A∪B⋄=(A∪B)⋄.
Proof. (i) It is clear that ϕc=X, but X∉P. Thus, we are done.
(ii) Since A⋄⊆cl(g,P)(A⋄) always true. We need to show that cl(g,P)(A⋄)⊆A⋄. Consider x∈cl(g,P)(A⋄) and U∈ψ(x). Thus,
U∩A⋄≠ϕ⇒∃y∈X |
satisfies y∈U∧y∈A⋄. Then, ∀ V∈ψ(y) we have
Vc∪Ac∈P⇒Uc∪Ac∈P. |
Therefore, x∈A⋄. Hence, cl(g,P)(A⋄)⊆A⋄.
(iii) From Theorem 3.1 and (ii) we can conclusion that (A⋄)⋄⊆A⋄, that is A⋄ is (g,P)-closed in X implies (A⋄)c is (g,P)-open.
(iv) Suppose that A⊆B and x∈A⋄. Then, for all U∈ψ(x) we have Ac∪Uc∈P. Hence, Bc∪Uc∈P. Therefore, x∈B⋄.
(v) From (iv) we have A⋄⊆(A∪B)⋄ and B⋄⊆(A∪B)⋄. Then,
A⋄∪B⋄⊆(A∪B)⋄. |
To prove the opposite direction, consider x∉A⋄∪B⋄ implies x∉A⋄ and x∉B⋄. Then, there exists U;V∈ψ(x) satisfies Ac∪Uc∉P and Bc∪Vc∉P. Consider a set W=U∩V, then W∈ψ(x) such that Ac∪Wc∉P and Bc∪Wc∉P. Then,
(A∪B)c∪Wc=(Ac∪Wc)∩(Bc∪Wc)∉P. |
Hence, x∉(A∪B)⋄. Therefore,
(A∪B)⋄⊆A⋄∪B⋄. |
(vi) The proof follows in the same way.
Remark 3.3. In a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P), the opposite inclusion of the Theorem 3.2 (vi) is not always true; the following example shows that.
Example 3.3. Consider
X={a,b,c}, g={ϕ,{a},{b},{a,b},X} |
and
P={ϕ,{a},{b},{c},{a,b}}. |
Let A={a,b} and B={c}. Then,
A⋄={c}=B⋄. |
Thus, A⋄∩B⋄={c} and (A∩B)⋄=ϕ. Therefore,
A⋄∩B⋄⊈(A∩B)⋄. |
Theorem 3.3. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, for two subsets A and B of X, A∩B⋄⊆(A∩B)⋄, whenever A is (g,P)-open.
Proof. If A is (g,P)-open and x∈A∩B⋄, then x∈A and x∈B⋄ implies for all
U∈ψ(x):Bc∩Uc∈P. |
Thus,
(A∩B)c∪Uc=Bc∪(A∩U)c∈P. |
Hence, x belongs to (A∩B)⋄. Therefore, we are done.
Theorem 3.4. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Suppose C(g,P)(X)∖{X} is a primal on X. Then, for all (g,P)-open sets U, we have U⊆U⋄.
Proof. If U=ϕ, then by Theorem 3.2 (i) we have U⋄=ϕ, hence U⊆U⋄. By hypotheses, if C(g,P)(X)∖{X} is primal, then X⋄=X since Xc=ϕ. From Theorem 3.3, we get
U=U∩X⋄⊆(U∩X)⋄=U⋄, |
∀(g,P)-open set U. Therefore, we are done.
Lemma 3.1. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, A⋄=ϕ, whenever Ac⊆X is not a primal.
Proof. Let x∈A⋄. Then, Ac∪Uc∈P for all U∈ψ(x). Since Ac is not primal, we get a contradiction. Therefore, A⋄=ϕ.
Theorem 3.5. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Then,
A⋄∖B⋄=(A∖B)⋄∖B⋄, |
for two subsets A and B of X.
Proof. We can represent A⋄ as
A⋄=[(A∖B)∪(A∩B)]⋄. |
From Theorem 3.2 (v), we get
A⋄=(A∖B)⋄∪(A∩B)⋄⊆(A∖B)⋄∪(A⋄∩B⋄). |
This implies
A⋄⊆(A∖B)⋄∪B⋄. |
Thus,
A⋄∖B⋄⊆(A∖B)⋄∖B⋄. |
On the other hand, since (A∖B)⊆A, (A∖B)⋄⊆A⋄ from Theorem 3.2 (iv). Hence,
(A∖B)⋄∖B⋄⊆A⋄∖B⋄. |
Therefore, we are done.
Corollary 3.1. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. If A,B⊆X and Bc is not a primal, then
(A∪B)⋄=A⋄=(A∖B)⋄. |
Proof. From Lemma 3.1 we get B⋄=ϕ. Thus,
(A∪B)⋄=A⋄∪B⋄=A⋄∪ϕ=A⋄. |
Also, by Theorem 3.5, (A∖B)⋄=A⋄.
Definition 3.4. In a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P). Consider an operator cl⋄: 2X→2X defined by cl⋄(A)=A∪A⋄, for a subset A of X.
Remark 3.4. It is shown by the following theorem that the map cl⋄ is a Kuratowskis closure operator.
Theorem 3.6. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, we have:
(i) cl⋄(ϕ)=ϕ.
(ii) For a subset A of X, A⊆cl⋄(A).
(iii) cl⋄(cl⋄(A))=cl⋄(A).
(iv) cl⋄(A)⊆cl⋄(B), whenever A⊆B for A,B⊆X.
(v) For A,B⊆X, cl⋄(A)∪cl⋄(B)=cl⋄(A∪B).
Proof. (i) Since ϕ⋄=ϕ,
cl⋄(ϕ)=ϕ∪ϕ⋄=ϕ. |
(ii) From the definition cl⋄(A)=A∪A⋄, we have A⊆cl⋄(A).
(iii) From (ii) A⊆cl⋄(A) implies
cl⋄(A)⊆cl⋄(cl⋄(A)). |
Conversely, since (A⋄)⋄⊆A⋄ by Theorem 3.2 (iii). Then,
cl⋄(cl⋄(A))=cl⋄(A)∪(cl⋄(A))⋄. |
Thus,
cl⋄(cl⋄(A))=cl⋄(A)∪(A∪A⋄)⋄. |
Hence,
cl⋄(cl⋄(A))=cl⋄(A)∪A⋄∪(A⋄)⋄⊆cl⋄(A)∪A⋄∪A⋄=cl⋄(A). |
Therefore, we are done.
(iv) If A⊆B, then from Theorem 3.2 (iv) we get A⋄⊆B⋄. Hence,
A∪A⋄⊆B∪B⋄ |
implies cl⋄(A)⊆cl⋄(B).
(v) Since
(A∪B)⋄=A⋄∪B⋄ |
is holded and cl⋄(A)=A∪A⋄. Then,
cl⋄(A)∪cl⋄(B)=(A∪A⋄)∪(B∪B⋄). |
Thus,
cl⋄(A)∪cl⋄(B)=(A∪B)∪(A⋄∪B⋄)=cl⋄(A∪B). |
Throughout this section, we will define a new kind of generalized primal topology on X that is stronger than the previous structure that is described in Definition 3.1.
Definition 4.1. In a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P) the collection
g⋄={A⊆X:cl⋄(Ac)=Ac} |
is a generalized primal topology on X induced by an operator cl⋄.
Proposition 4.1. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, g is weaker than g⋄.
Proof. Suppose that A∈g. Then, Ac is (g,P)-closed in X implies (Ac)⋄⊆Ac. Hence
cl⋄(Ac)=Ac∪(Ac)⋄⊆Ac. |
But Ac⊆cl⋄(Ac). Then, cl⋄(Ac)=Ac. Therefore, A∈g⋄.
Theorem 4.1. Consider (X,g,P) and (X,g,Q) as two generalized primal topological spaces. If P⊆Q, then g⋄ induced by primal P is finer than g⋄ induced by primal Q.
Proof. Let A∈g⋄ induced by primal Q. Then, Ac∪(Ac)⋄ with respect to Q equal to Ac implies (Ac)⋄ with respect to Q⊆Ac. Let x∉Ac. Then, x∉(Ac)⋄ with respect to Q implies ∃U∈ψ(x) such that
Uc∪(Ac)c=Uc∪A∉Q, |
but P⊆Q. Then, Uc∪A∉P. Hence, x∉(Ac)⋄ with respect to P. Thus, (Ac)⋄ with respect to P ⊆Ac implies
cl⋄(Ac)=Ac∪(Ac)⋄ |
with respect to P equal to Ac. Therefore, A∈g⋄ induced by P.
Theorem 4.2. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, A∈g⋄⇔ for all x∈A, ∃U∈ψ(x) satisfies (Uc∪A)∉P.
Proof. Let A∈g⋄. Then,
A∈g⋄⇔cl⋄(Ac)=Ac. |
Thus,
A∈g⋄⇔Ac∪(Ac)⋄=Ac. |
However, (Ac)⋄⊆Ac. Then,
A∈g⋄⇔A⊆((Ac)⋄)c. |
Thus,
A∈g⋄⇔x∉(Ac)⋄, ∀x∈A. |
Therefore,
A∈g⋄⇔Uc∪(Ac)c=Uc∪A∉P, |
for some U∈ψ(x).
Theorem 4.3. For a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P) the collection
BP={G∩P:G∈g and P∉P} |
is a base for g⋄ on X.
Proof. Consider B∈BP. Then, there exists G∈g and P∉P such that B=G∩P. Since g⊆g⋄, then G∈g⋄. Since cl⋄(Pc)=Pc, then P∈g⋄. Hence, B∈g⋄. Consequently, BP⊆g⋄. Let A∈g⋄ and x∈A. Hence, by Theorem 4.2, ∃U∈ψ(x) satisfies Uc∪A∉P. Consider
B=U∩(Uc∪A). |
Then, B∈BP such that x∈B⊆A.
Definition 4.2. In a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P). Consider an operator Φ: 2X→2X identify as
Φ(A)={x∈X: ∃ U∈ψ(x) satisfay (U∖A)c∉P}, |
for A⊆X.
The following theorem defines the relationship between the previously investigated maps (.)⋄ and (Φ).
Theorem 4.4. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence,
Φ(A)=X∖(X∖A)⋄, |
for a subset A of X.
Proof. Suppose that x∈Φ(A), then ∃U∈ψ(x) such that (U∖A)c∉P. Hence,
(U∩(X∖A))c=(Uc∪A)∉P. |
Thus, x∉(X∖A)⋄ implies
x∈X∖(X∖A)⋄. |
Hence,
Φ(A)⊆X∖(X∖A)⋄. |
Conversely, suppose that
x∈X∖(X∖A)⋄ |
implies x∉(X∖A)⋄. Then, ∃U∈ψ(x) we have
Uc∪(X∖A)c=(U∖A)c∉P. |
Then, x∈Φ(A). Hence,
X∖(X∖A)⋄⊆Φ(A). |
Therefore, we are done.
Corollary 4.1. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, Φ(A) is (g,P)-open.
Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 3.2 (ii) and Theorem 4.4.
Remark 4.1. Unlike the map cl⋄, the map Φ does not satisfy the four Kuratowskis closure operator conditions, and this is proven in the following theory.
Theorem 4.5. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, the next hold:
(i) Φ(A)⊆Φ(B), whenever A⊆B.
(ii) If U∈g⋄, then U⊆Φ(U).
(iii) Φ(A)⊆Φ(Φ(A)).
(iv) Φ(A)=Φ(Φ(A))⇔(X∖A)⋄=((X∖A)⋄)⋄.
Proof. (i) Let x∈Φ(A). Then, (U∖A)c∉P, but A⊆B. Then, (U∖B)c∉P. Hence, x∈Φ(B). Therefore, Φ(A)⊆Φ(B).
(ii) If U∈g⋄, then
cl⋄(X∖U)=X∖U |
implies
(X∖U)∪(X∖U)⋄=X∖U. |
Then, (X∖U)⋄ subset of X∖U. Hence,
U⊆X∖(X∖U)⋄=Φ(U). |
(iii) Since Φ(A) is (g,P)-open and g⊆g⋄,
Φ(A)∈g⋄⇒Φ(A)⊆Φ(Φ(A)) |
from (ii).
(iv) Let Φ(A)=Φ(Φ(A)). Then
Φ(Φ(A))=Φ(X∖(X∖A)⋄)=X∖(X∖(X∖(X∖A)⋄))⋄. |
Hence, we have
Φ(Φ(A))=X∖((X∖A)⋄)⋄. |
Since Φ(A)=Φ(Φ(A)),
(X∖A)⋄=((X∖A)⋄)⋄. |
Conversely, let
(X∖A)⋄=((X∖A)⋄)⋄. |
From (iii) we get Φ(A)⊆Φ(Φ(A)). Let x∈Φ(Φ(A)). Then, x belongs to X∖((X∖A)⋄)⋄ implies x belongs to X∖(X∖A)⋄. Then, x∈Φ(A). Hence, Φ(Φ(A))⊆Φ(A). Therefore, Φ(A)=Φ(Φ(A)).
Extra properties of the function Φ will be studied in the next theorem.
Theorem 4.6. Consider (X,g,P) as a generalized primal topological space. Hence, the next hold:
(i) Φ(A∩B)=Φ(A)∩Φ(B), for A,B⊆X.
(ii) For A⊆X, Φ(A)=X∖X⋄, whenever Ac∉P.
Proof. (i) It is clear that Φ(A∩B)⊆Φ(A) and Φ(A∩B)⊆Φ(B). Then,
Φ(A∩B)⊆Φ(A)∩Φ(B). |
Conversely, suppose that x∈Φ(A)∩Φ(B). Implies there exists U;V∈ψ(x) satisfies (U∖A)c∉P and (V∖B)c∉P. Consider
W=U∩V∈ψ(x) |
implies (W∖A)c∉P and (W∖B)c∉P. Hence,
(W∖(A∩B))c=(W∖A)c∩(W∖B)c∉P. |
Then, x belongs to Φ(A∩B). Hence,
Φ(A)∩Φ(B)⊆Φ(A∩B). |
(ii) By using Corollary 3.1, we have X⋄=(X∖A)⋄. Hence,
Φ(A)=X∖(X∖A)⋄=X∖X⋄. |
Theorem 4.7. For a generalized primal topological space (X,g,P). Consider the collection
σ={A⊆X:A⊆Φ(A)}, |
thus σ is a generalized primal topology induced by an operator Φ. Moreover, σ=g⋄.
Proof. It is clear that ϕ⊆Φ(ϕ). Then, ϕ∈σ. If
{Aα:α∈Λ}⊆σ, |
then for each α∈Λ we have
Aα⊆Φ(Aα)⊆Φ(⋃α∈ΛAα). |
Hence,
⋃α∈ΛAα⊆Φ(⋃α∈ΛAα). |
Thus, σ is a generalized primal topology on X induced by Φ.
Let U∈g⋄ and x∈U. Then, from Theorem 4.3, there exists V∈ψ(x) and P∉P satisfy
x∈V∩P⊆U. |
Since P⊆(V∖U)c, then (V∖U)c∉P. Hence, x∈Φ(U) implies U∈Φ(U). Therefore, g⋄⊆σ. On the other hand let A∈σ, then A⊆Φ(A) implies
A⊆X∖(X∖A)⋄ |
and
(X∖A)⋄⊆X∖A. |
Thus, X∖A is (g,P)-closed. Then, A∈g⋄. Therefore, σ⊆g⋄.
Coinciding with the great spread of many literatures in various fields important mathematical structures appeared in the theory of topology coinciding with this scientific revolution. For example, the concept of generalized topology appeared, which is based on the concept of "generalized open set" and this space was more generalized than the topological space as the intersection condition was neglected. This space has been extensively studied; much literature has been written about it, and many properties and theories have been studied about it.
In this paper, we have made a new contribution to the field of generalized topology by studying the concept of primal generalized topology, which has a lot of interesting properties. The results obtained in this paper are preliminary. Future research could give more insights by exploring further properties of generalized primal topology. This work opens up the door for possible contributions to this trend by combining primal structures with generalized structures in the theory of generalized topology. If possible, we are looking forward to connecting this notion with some ideas like supra-topology and infra-topology.
The authors declare they have not used artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] | S. Banach, Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales, Fund. Math., 3 (1922), 133–181. |
[2] | S. Saks, Theory of the integral, Warszawa: Monografje Matematyczne, 1933. |
[3] | I. Bakhtin, The contraction mapping principle in quasi-metric spaces, Funct. Anal., 30 (1989), 26–37. |
[4] | S. Czerwik, Contraction mappings in b-metric spaces, Acta Mathematica et Informatica Universitatis Ostraviensis, 1 (1993), 5–11. |
[5] |
T. Kamran, M. Samreen, Q. Ain, A generalization of b-metric space and some fixed point theorems, Mathematics, 5 (2017), 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math5020019 doi: 10.3390/math5020019
![]() |
[6] |
N. Mlaiki, H. Aydi, N. Souayah, T. Abdeljawad, Controlled metric type spaces and the related contraction principle, Mathematics, 6 (2018), 194. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math6100194 doi: 10.3390/math6100194
![]() |
[7] |
T. Abdeljawad, N. Mlaiki, H. Aydi, N. Souayah, Double controlled metric type spaces and some fixed point results, Mathematics, 6 (2018), 320. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math6120320 doi: 10.3390/math6120320
![]() |
[8] |
H. Ahmad, M. Younis, M. Koksal, Double controlled partial metric type spaces and convergence results, J. Math., 2021 (2021), 7008737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7008737 doi: 10.1155/2021/7008737
![]() |
[9] |
D. Wardowski, Fixed points of a new type of contractive mappings in complete metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2012 (2012), 94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2012-94 doi: 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-94
![]() |
[10] | M. Younis, D. Singh, A. Goyal, Solving existence problems via F-reich contraction, In: Integral methods in science and engineering, Cham: Birkhäuser, 2019,451–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16077-7_35 |
[11] |
M. Younis, N. Mirkov, A. Savić, M. Pantović, S. Radenović, Some critical remarks on recent results concerning ϝ-contractions in b-metric spaces, Cubo, 25 (2023), 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.56754/0719-0646.2501.057 doi: 10.56754/0719-0646.2501.057
![]() |
[12] | W. Kirk, P. Srinavasan, P. Veeramani, Fixed points for mapping satisfying cyclical contractive conditions, Fixed Point Theor., 4 (2003), 79–89. |
[13] |
S. Karpagam, S. Agrawal, Best proximity point theorems for cyclic orbital Meir-Keeler contraction maps, Nonlinear Anal.-Theor., 74 (2011), 1040–1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2010.07.026 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.07.026
![]() |
[14] |
N. Alamgir, Q. Kiran, H. Aydi, V. Parvaneh, A. Dinmohammadi, A Fredholm integral equation via a fixed point result in controlled metric spaces, J. Math. Ext., 16 (2022), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.30495/JME.2022.2019 doi: 10.30495/JME.2022.2019
![]() |
[15] |
E. Karapinar, P. Kumari, D. Lateef, A new approach to the solution of the Fredholm integral equation via a fixed point on extended b-metric spaces, Symmetry, 10 (2018), 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym10100512 doi: 10.3390/sym10100512
![]() |
[16] |
K. Hussain, Existence and uniqueness results of mild solutions for integro-differential Volterra-Fredholm equations, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 28 (2023), 137–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jmcs.028.02.02 doi: 10.22436/jmcs.028.02.02
![]() |
[17] |
Y. Shi, Q. Lan, X. Lan, J. Wu, T. Yang, B. Wang, Robust optimization design of a flying wing using adjoint and uncertainty-based aerodynamic optimization approach, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 66 (2023), 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03559-z doi: 10.1007/s00158-023-03559-z
![]() |
[18] |
Y. Shi, C. Song, Y. Chen, H. Rao, T. Yang, Complex standard eigenvalue problem derivative computation for Laminar-Turbulent transition prediction, AIAA J., 61 (2023), 3404–3418. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.J062212 doi: 10.2514/1.J062212
![]() |
[19] |
J. Tan, K. Zhang, B. Li, A. Wu, Event-triggered sliding mode control for spacecraft reorientation with multiple attitude constraints, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 59 (2023), 6031–6043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2023.3270391 doi: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3270391
![]() |
[20] |
L. He, A. Valocchi, C. Duarte, A transient global-local generalized FEM for parabolic and hyperbolic PDEs with multi-space/time scales, J. Comput. Phys., 488 (2023), 112179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112179 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112179
![]() |
1. | Mohd Vasiulla, Mohabbat Ali, İnan Ünal, A study of mixed super quasi-Einstein manifolds with applications to general relativity, 2024, 21, 0219-8878, 10.1142/S0219887824501779 |