Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Criteria of existence and stability of an n-coupled system of generalized Sturm-Liouville equations with a modified ABC fractional derivative and an application to the SEIR influenza epidemic model

  • The primary objective of this study was to explore the behavior of an n-coupled system of generalized Sturm-Liouville (GSL) and Langevin equations under a modified ABC fractional derivative. We aimed to analyze the dynamics of the system and gain insights into how this operator influences the conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions. We established the existence and uniqueness of solutions by employing the Banach contraction principle and Leray-Schauder's alternative fixed-point theorem. We also investigated the Hyers-Ulam stability of the system. This analysis allows us to understand the stability properties of the solutions and evaluate their sensitivity to perturbations. Furthermore, we employed Lagrange's interpolation polynomials to produce a numerical scheme for the influenza epidemic model. By combining theoretical analysis, mathematical principles, and numerical simulations, this study contributes to enriching our understanding of the behavior of the system and offers insights into its dynamics and practical applications in epidemiology.

    Citation: Elkhateeb S. Aly, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Khaled A. Aldwoah, Kamal Shah. Criteria of existence and stability of an n-coupled system of generalized Sturm-Liouville equations with a modified ABC fractional derivative and an application to the SEIR influenza epidemic model[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14228-14252. doi: 10.3934/math.2024691

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, Dumitru Baleanu, Ghada Alobaidi, Mutti-Ur Rehman . Existence of solutions and a numerical scheme for a generalized hybrid class of n-coupled modified ABC-fractional differential equations with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6609-6625. doi: 10.3934/math.2023334
    [2] Erdal Bas, Ramazan Ozarslan . Theory of discrete fractional Sturm–Liouville equations and visual results. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 593-612. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.593
    [3] Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Praveen Agarwal . Piecewise mABC fractional derivative with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24345-24366. doi: 10.3934/math.20231241
    [4] Zhongqian Wang, Xuejun Zhang, Mingliang Song . Three nonnegative solutions for Sturm-Liouville BVP and application to the complete Sturm-Liouville equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6543-6558. doi: 10.3934/math.2023330
    [5] Tuba Gulsen, Sertac Goktas, Thabet Abdeljawad, Yusuf Gurefe . Sturm-Liouville problem in multiplicative fractional calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22794-22812. doi: 10.3934/math.20241109
    [6] Ndolane Sene . Fractional input stability for electrical circuits described by the Riemann-Liouville and the Caputo fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(1): 147-165. doi: 10.3934/Math.2019.1.147
    [7] Haifa Bin Jebreen, Beatriz Hernández-Jiménez . Pseudospectral method for fourth-order fractional Sturm-Liouville problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 26077-26091. doi: 10.3934/math.20241274
    [8] Mukhamed Aleroev, Hedi Aleroeva, Temirkhan Aleroev . Proof of the completeness of the system of eigenfunctions for one boundary-value problem for the fractional differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 714-720. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.714
    [9] Youyu Wang, Xianfei Li, Yue Huang . The Green's function for Caputo fractional boundary value problem with a convection term. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 4887-4897. doi: 10.3934/math.2022272
    [10] Thabet Abdeljawad, Sabri T. M. Thabet, Imed Kedim, Miguel Vivas-Cortez . On a new structure of multi-term Hilfer fractional impulsive neutral Levin-Nohel integrodifferential system with variable time delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7372-7395. doi: 10.3934/math.2024357
  • The primary objective of this study was to explore the behavior of an n-coupled system of generalized Sturm-Liouville (GSL) and Langevin equations under a modified ABC fractional derivative. We aimed to analyze the dynamics of the system and gain insights into how this operator influences the conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions. We established the existence and uniqueness of solutions by employing the Banach contraction principle and Leray-Schauder's alternative fixed-point theorem. We also investigated the Hyers-Ulam stability of the system. This analysis allows us to understand the stability properties of the solutions and evaluate their sensitivity to perturbations. Furthermore, we employed Lagrange's interpolation polynomials to produce a numerical scheme for the influenza epidemic model. By combining theoretical analysis, mathematical principles, and numerical simulations, this study contributes to enriching our understanding of the behavior of the system and offers insights into its dynamics and practical applications in epidemiology.



    Fractional calculus is a mathematical field that deals with derivatives and integrals of non-integer orders. It extends traditional calculus and enables more precise modeling of complex systems with memory and hereditary characteristics [3,18,26,29,32,33]. Various fractional operators have been proposed to describe different types of fractional derivatives. For instance, Atangana and Baleanu [10] introduced the concept of the AB-fractional derivative and explored its applications. The ABC fractional derivative exhibits improved behavior for functions with singularities or non-smooth features, making it particularly suited for capturing complex dynamics in practical systems [21]. Its significance extends to a wide range of applications, including signal processing, control systems, and epidemiological modeling [4,5,6,28]. Al-Refai and Baleanu [8] proposed a modification to ABC fractional operator (MABC), which allows for easier initialization of fractional models. This modification has been shown to enable the discovery of new solution types, expanding the range of possible solutions for these equations [7]. The significance of the MABC fractional operator lies in its ability to accurately represent the behavior of real-world systems and facilitate the analysis and control of complex nonlinear phenomena. For example, Khan et al. [22] studied the MABC fractional order smoking model. Khan et al. [23] studied the dynamics of a piecewise MABC fractional-order leukemia model with symmetric numerical simulations. Rahman [31] studied some theoretical and numerical investigations of the MABC fractional operator for the spread of polio under the effect of vaccination. Eiman et al. [17] studied the rotavirus infectious disease model using a piecewise MABC fractional derivative. Khan et al. [24,25] investigated the existence of solutions for the hybrid class of the MABC fractional operator with an application to a waterborne disease model.

    These studies demonstrate the versatility and effectiveness of the MABC fractional operator in elucidating the dynamics and mechanisms of infectious diseases, thereby paving the way for improved disease understanding, control, and prevention strategies. The local and global stability analyses are important in understanding the behavior and performance of dynamical systems. For example, the authors [36] investigated less conservative stability conditions for the discrete-time hidden semi-Markov jump linear systems emission probability matrix, using the eliminating matrix product technique. They obtained numerically testable conditions for the existence of an observed mode-dependent control. The authors [27] studied the global dynamics and optimal control of malicious signal transmission in wireless sensor networks using Pontryagin's maximum principle. They examined the local and global stability of two types of steady states in the discontinuous system through the analysis of the characteristic equation and comparison arguments method, respectively.

    On the other hand, the importance of generalized Sturm-Liouville equations [32] lies in their ability to model a wide range of practical phenomena, including heat conduction, diffusion processes, and quantum mechanics [26]. By capturing the complex dynamics of such systems, these equations provide valuable insights that aid in the design and optimization of engineering structures, the understanding of physical processes, and the development of mathematical models for real-life applications [18].

    There are some researchers who have studied the Sturm-Liouville (SL) and generalized Sturm-Liouville (GSL) equations with different fractional derivatives and various conditions. For example, Batiha et al. [12] studied the GSL equations with a Hadamard fractional derivative under three nonlocal Hadamard fractional integral boundary conditions. Boutiara et al. [14] investigated the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a generalized quantum fractional SL difference problem with terminal boundary conditions, utilizing Mönch's fixed-point theorem, the Kuratowski measure of noncompactness, and the Banach contraction principle. Boutiara et al. [13] undertook a meticulous examination of the SL equation, featuring the intriguing p-Laplacian operator, in the context of a generalized Caputo-type derivative. Ercan in [15] presented a novel methodology known as the Laplace-Adomian decomposition method, specifically tailored to address two distinct types of nonlinear fractional SL problems, employing both the Caputo and ABC derivatives. Furthermore, Baleanu et al. [11] delved into the study of a coupled system comprising GSL problems and Langevin fractional differential equations, elucidating their behavior under the influence of the ABC fractional operator. Berhail et al. [16] explored a boundary value problem associated with the system of GSL and Langevin, employing the Hadamard fractional derivative as a pivotal mathematical tool.

    Motivated by the importance of both GSL equations and the MABC fractional derivative, this research paper aims to extend the works in [11,12] by investigating the criteria for the existence and stability of the following n-coupled system of GSL equations utilizing the MABC fractional derivative

    {MABCDηι[ςi(ι)MABCDϱti(ι)+ρi(ι)i(ι)]=gi(ι,1,2,,n),ιΩ:=[0,b],i(0)=0,ςi(0)MABCDϱ0i(ι)+ρi(0)i(0)=0,i=1,2,,n, (1.1)

    where, MABCDηι and MABCDϱι are MABC fractional derivatives of order η and ϱ, respectively, such that 0<η,ϱ<1, the functions ρi:ΩR+ are continuous such that ρi=maxιΩ|ρi(ι)|, and ςi:ΩR+{0} are continuous functions with ςi=minιΩ|ςi(ι)|, for all ιΩ,i=1,2,,n. The functions gi:Ω×RnR are continuous such that (gi(ι,1,2,,n))ι=0=0. System (1.1) has some special cases depending on the functions ςi(t) and ρi(t). For example:

    ● If ρi(t)=0,ιΩ, then the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is reduced to the following n-coupled MABC-SL fractional system

    {MABCDηι[ςi(ι)MABCDϱti(ι)]=gi(ι,1,2,,n),ιΩ:=[0,b],i(0)=0,ςi(0)MABCDϱ0i(ι)=0,i=1,2,,n. (1.2)

    ● If ςi(ι)=1, and ρi(t)=ρiR, ιΩ, then the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is reduced to the following n-coupled MABC-Langevin fractional system

    {MABCDηι[MABCDϱti(t)+ρii(t)]=gi(ι,1,2,,n),ιΩ:=[0,b],i(0)=0,MABCDϱ0i(t)+ρii(0)=0,i=1,2,,n. (1.3)

    Our contributions to this work are given as:

    ● We utilize theoretical analysis to establish the foundations of our research. We employ mathematical principles, such as MABC fractional operators, an n-coupled system of generalized Sturm-Liouville (GSL) and Langevin equations, and fixed-point techniques to formulate sufficient conditions for the existence, uniqueness, and stability of the system (1.1).

    ● To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the n-coupled MABC systems represented by Eq (1.1). Therefore, our work aims to fill this gap in the existing literature by investigating the behavior of the n-coupled system of GSL equations under the MABC fractional operator. Through the establishment of rigorous criteria for existence and stability, our research contributes to a better understanding of the dynamics of n-coupled systems.

    ● We introduce a numerical algorithm for the nonlinear MABC-GSL fractional equations by using Lagrange's interpolation method and apply this method to produce a numerical scheme for the influenza epidemic model. By extending the application to infectious disease modeling, we not only broaden the scope of our research but also demonstrate the practical significance of the MABC operator. We seek to deepen knowledge and provide broader insights into the implications of the MABC fractional operator in understanding complex systems and their potential applications in the field of infectious diseases.

    ● We discuss numerical simulations of the influenza epidemic model to enhance our understanding of the model's behavior. These numerical simulations allow us to investigate the model's dynamics, explore parameter spaces, and analyze the effects of various scenarios or interventions.

    The construction of the paper is as follows: In Section 2, we provide a comprehensive review of the basic definitions and lemmas related to the MABC fractional operator. In Section 3, we present our main results, including converting the nonlinear fractional n-coupled system into an equivalent integral equation. We then discuss the sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions of system (1.1) by employing the Banach contraction principle and Leray-Schauder's alternative fixed-point theorem. Furthermore, we discuss the system's stability conditions (1.1). In Section 4, we introduce a numerical scheme based on Lagrange's interpolation method for efficient computation and analysis of the system. In Section 5, we present an application of the numerical scheme to study the influenza epidemic model. Through this organization, we aim to present a clear and logical progression of the research, ensuring that readers can easily comprehend and appreciate the significance of our findings.

    Throughout this paper, we will frequently rely on the fundamental definitions of the MABC operator, which are presented in this section.

    Definition 2.1. [7,8] For ϱ(0,1) and L1(0,b), the MABC-fractional derivative is given by

    MABCDϱι(ι)=Δ(ϱ)1ϱ[(ι)Eϱ(μϱιϱ)(0)μϱı0(ıs)ϱ1Eϱ,ϱ(μϱ(ıs)ϱ)(s)ds],

    where, μϱ=ϱ1ϱ. Given this definition, one can easily verify that MABCDϱιC=0.

    Definition 2.2. [7,8] For ϱ(0,1) and L1(0,b), the MAB-fractional integral is given by

    mABIϱι(ι)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)[(ı)+μϱRLIϱι[](0)(1+μϱιϱΓ(ϱ+1))]=1ϱΔ(ϱ)[(ı)(0)]+ϱΔ(ϱ)RLIϱι[(ı)(0)].

    Lemma 2.3. [8] For L1(0,) and ϱ(0,1), we have

    mABIϱιMABCDϱι(ι)=(ı)(0).

    Lemma 2.4. [34] Let βφ be the closed ball of radius φ>0, centred at zero in a Banach space A and Ψ : βφA is a contraction mapping such that Ψ (βφ)βφ. Then, Ψ has a unique fixed point in βφ.

    Lemma 2.5. [19] Let βφ be a non-empty, closed, and convex subset of a Banach space A. If Ψ : βφA is a completely continuous operator and Φ(Ψ)={(βφ,=ξ Ψ (),0<ξ<1}, then, either Φ(Ψ) is unbounded or Ψ has a fixed point.

    In this section, we will examine the sufficient conditions that guarantee the existence and uniqueness of the system solution (1.1), as well as special cases (1.2) and (1.3). Additionally, we will discuss four types of stability of systems (1.1), (1.2), and (1.3). We will start by converting the nonlinear fractional n-coupled system (1.1) into an equivalent integral equation to apply fixed-point techniques.

    Lemma 3.1. For 0<ϱ,η<1, let ςi,ρi:ΩR be continuous functions such that ςi(ι)0 for all ιΩ and gi:Ω×RR be continuous functions with gi(ι,1,2,,n)ι=0=0. Then, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is equivalent to the following integral equation:

    i(ι)=MABIϱι[MABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι)]. (3.1)

    Or

    i(ι)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)(MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι))+ϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)ι0(ιs)ϱ1(MABIηιgi(s,1,2,,n)ρi(s)i(s)ςi(s))ds.

    Proof. Let i be a solution of system (1.1). Applying the operator MABIηι on both sides of system (1.1) and using Lemma 2.3, we get

    [ςi(ι)MABCDϱιi(ι)+ρi(ι)i(ι)]=c1+MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n).

    Thus, we have

    MABCDϱιi(ι)=c1+MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι). (3.2)

    By the second condition ςi(0)MABCDϱ0i(ι)+ρi(0)i(0)=0, we have c1=0. Substituting the value of c1 in (3.2), we get

    MABCDϱιi(ι)=MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι). (3.3)

    Applying the operator MABIϱι on both sides of Eq (3.3) and using Lemma 2.3, we get

    i(ι)=c2+MABIϱιMABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι). (3.4)

    By assumption gi(ι,1,2,,n)ι=0=0, i(0)=0, and by Definition 2.2 in [7], we get c2=0. Substituting the value of c2 in Eq (3.4), we get

    i(ι)=MABIϱιMABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι).

    By Definition 2.2, we can write the solution as

    i(ι)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)(MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι))+ϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)ι0(ιs)ϱ1(MABIηιgi(s,1,2,,n)ρi(s)i(s)ςi(s))ds1ϱΔ(ϱ)(MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι))ι=0(1+μϱιϱΓ(ϱ+1)).

    Also, by the assumption gi(ι,1,2,,n)ι=0=0, i(0)=0, and by Definition 2.2 in [7], we have

    (MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι))ι=0=0.

    Thus, the solution of the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is given by

    i(ι)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)(MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι))+ϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)ι0(ιs)ϱ1(MABIηιgi(s,1,2,n)ρi(s)i(s)ςi(s))ds.

    Conversely, it can be readily demonstrated through direct computation that the integral equation (3.1) fulfills the requirements of the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1). The proof is complete.

    For our analysis, we shall define the Banach space. Consider an interval Ω=[0,b]R, and the Banach space A=C(Ω,R) which consists of all continuous functions :ΩR. The norm of a function in this space is defined as =maxιΩ|(ι)|. Therefore, (A,) forms a Banach space. Define the n-product space H=A×A××An times with the norm

    1,2,,n=ni=1i.

    Clearly, (H,1,2,,n) is a Banach space. For i=1,2,,n, we define an operator Ψ:H H by

    Ψ(1,2,,n)(ι)=(Ψ1,Ψ2,Ψn), (3.5)

    with the norm

    Ψ(1,2,,n)=ni=1Ψi(i), (3.6)

    where

    Ψi(i(ι))=MABIϱιMABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι),i=1,2,,n. (3.7)

    So, all the fixed points of (3.7) are the solutions of the system (1.1). In this paper, a closed ball Bφ with radius φ centered on the zero function in product Banach space H is defined by

    Bφ={(1,2,,n)H:(1,2,n)φ}. (3.8)

    For further analysis, the following conditions must be satisfied:

    (C1) For all ιΩ, there exists a positive constant Υi, such that

    |gi(ι,i(ι))|Υi.

    (C2) For each ιΩ and i,ˆiH, there exists constant numbers Ki>1,i=1,2,,n such that

    |gi(ι,1,2,,n)gi(ι,ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)|Kini=1|iˆi|.

    For (1,2,,n)Bφ,ιΩ, then by condition (C2), we have

    |gi(ι,(1,2,,n))|=|gi(ι,1,2,,n)gi(ι,0,,0)+gi(ι,0,,0)||gi(ι,1,2,n)gi(ι,0,,0)|+|gi(ι,0,,0)|Kini=1|i(ι)|+|gi(ι,0,,0)|Kini=1|i(ι)|+BiKiφ+Bi, (3.9)

    where

    Bi=maxιΩ|gi(ι,0,,0)|<,i=1,2,,n.

    For i=1,2,,n, to simplify the analysis, we fix the following notations:

    ςi=minιΩ|ςi(ι)|0,ρi=maxιΩ|ρi(ι)|,Πϱ=(1ϱΔ(ϱ)+bϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)),Πη=(1ηΔ(η)+bηΔ(η)Γ(η)). (3.10)

    In this subsection, we examine the sufficient conditions that guarantee the uniqueness of the solution for system (1.1), as well as special cases (1.2) and (1.3) by using the Banach fixed-point Lemma 2.4.

    Theorem 3.2. Under the condition (C2) and 0<Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})<1,i=1,2,,n, if we choose

    φ{Πϱni=1Biςi1Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})},

    then, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) has a unique solution.

    Proof. Consider the operator Ψ defined by (3.5) and closed ball Bφ defined by (3.8). To apply Banach fixed-point Lemma 2.4, we divided the proof into the following steps:

    Step 1: In the first step, we prove that Ψ (1,2,,n)Bφ. For i=1,2,n and (1,2,,n)Bφ, ιΩ, we have

    |Ψi(i(ι))|=|MABIϱιMABIηtgi(ι,1,2,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι)|1ςi[MABIϱι(MABIηt|gi(ι,1,2,,n)|)+MABIϱιρi|i(ι)|]. (3.11)

    Now, we compute the two integrals in (3.11) separately. By Definition 2.2, with gi(ι,1,2,,n)ι=0=0, we obtain

    |MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)|1ηΔ(η)|gi(ι,1,2,,n)|+ηΔ(η)Γ(η)ι0(ιs)η1|gi(s,1,2,,n)|ds. (3.12)

    Putting (3.9) in (3.12), we get

    |MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)|(1ηΔ(η)+bηΔ(η)Γ(η))Kiφ+(1ηΔ(η)+bηΔ(η)Γ(η))BiΠη(Kiφ+Bi), (3.13)

    where Πη is defined by (3.10). By (3.13), we have

    |MABIϱι[MABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)]|1ϱΔ(ϱ)Πη(Kiφ+Bi)+Πη(Kiφ+Bi)ϱΔ(ϱ)1Γ(ϱ)ı0(ıs)ϱ1dsΠϱΠη(Kiφ+Bi). (3.14)

    In the same manner, we obtain

    MABIϱι[|ρii|]1ϱΔ(ϱ)ρi|i(ι)|+ρiϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)ı0(ıs)ϱ1|i(s)|ds1ϱΔ(ϱ)ρii+ρibϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)iρiΠϱi. (3.15)

    Putting (3.14) and (3.15) in (3.11) and taking the maximum value of both sides, we get

    Ψi(i)1ςi[ΠϱΠη(Kiφ+Bi)+ρiΠϱi].

    Thus, by (3.6), we have

    Ψ(1,2,,n)=ni=1Ψi(i)Πϱφni=11ςi(ΠηKi+nmaxi=1{ρi})+Πϱni=1Biςiφ.

    This implies that Ψ(1,2,,n)Bφ. Next, let (1,2,,n),(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)Bφ,ιΩ, then, by (3.12), we get

    MABIηι|gi(ι,1,2,,n)gi(ι,ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)|ΠηKini=1|i(ι)ˆi(ι)|. (3.16)

    In the same manner as in (3.14) and (3.15), we get

    MABIϱι[MABIηt|gi(ι,1,2,,n)gi(ι,ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)|]ΠϱΠηKini=1|i(ι)ˆi(ι)|, (3.17)

    and

    MABIϱι[ρi|i(ι)ˆi(ι)|]ρiΠϱ|i(ι)ˆi(ι)|. (3.18)

    Thus, by (3.17) and (3.18), and taking the maximum value of both sides, we have

    Ψi(1,2,,n)Ψi(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ΠϱςiΠηKi(1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)+ρiςiΠϱiˆi.

    Thus, by (3.6), we have

    Ψ(1,2,,n)Ψ(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+nmaxi=1{ρi})(1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn).

    Since, Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})<1,i=1,2,,n, then, we conclude that Ψ is a contraction. Consequently, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) has a unique solution.

    As a result of the above uniqueness Theorem 3.2, we have the following two corollaries.

    Corollary 3.3. Under the condition (C2) and 0<Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi)<1,i=1,2,,n, if we choose

    φ{Πϱni=1Biςi1Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi)},

    then, the n-coupled MABC-SL system (1.2) has a unique solution.

    Corollary 3.4. Under the condition (C2) and 0<Πϱni=1(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})<1,i=1,2,,n, if we choose

    φ{Πϱni=1Bi1Πϱni=1(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})},

    then, the n-coupled MABC-Langevin system (1.3) has a unique solution.

    In this subsection, we developed the sufficient conditions for the existence of a solution of system (1.1) by using Leray-Schauder's alternative Lemma 2.5.

    Theorem 3.5. Under the condition (C1), if 0<Πϱmaxni=1{ρiςi}<1, then the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) has a solution.

    Proof. Consider the operator Ψ defined by (3.5) and closed ball Bφi defined by (3.8). To apply the Leray-Schauder's alternative theorem, we divided the proof into the following steps.

    Step 1: We shall prove that Ψ is completely continuous (continuous, bounded, and equicontinuous). The continuity of gi implies that Ψ is continuous too. Let ιΩ. Then, for i=1,2,,n and (1,2,,n)Bφ, we have

    |Ψi(i(ι))|=|MABIϱι[MABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρiiςi]|1ςi[MABIϱι(MABIηt|gi(ι,1,2,,n)|)+MABIϱι|ρii|]. (3.19)

    By condition (C1), we have

    |MABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)|ΠηΥi. (3.20)

    Thus, by (3.19) and (3.20), we have

    Ψi(i)1ϱΔ(ϱ)ςiΠηΥi+bϱΔ(ϱ)ςiΓ(ϱ)ΠηΥi+1ϱΔ(ϱ)ρiςii+ρiςibϱiΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)Πϱςi[ΠηΥi+ρiiςi].

    Hence,

    Ψ(1,2,,n)=ni=1Ψi(i)ni=1Πϱςi[ΠηΥi+ρiiςi]<.

    Thus, Ψ is bounded by ni=1Πϱςi[ΠηΥi+ρiiςi]. Next, for i=1,2,,n,\ let ι1,ι2Ω, with 0<ι1<ι2<b. Then, for (1,2,,n)Bφ, we have

    |Ψi(i(ι2))Ψi(i(ι1))|ΠηΥiϱΔ(ϱ)ςiΓ(ϱ)ι10[(ι2s)ϱ1(ι1s)ϱ1]ds+ΠηΥiϱΔ(ϱ)ςiΓ(ϱ)ι2ι1(ι2s)ϱ1ds+ρiϱΔ(ϱ)ςiΓ(ϱ)ι10[(ι2s)ϱ1(ι1s)ϱ1]|i(s)|ds+ρiϱΔ(ϱ)ςiΓ(ϱ)ι2ι1(ι2s)ϱ1|i(s)|dsΠηΥiΔ(ϱ)ςiΓ(ϱ)[ιϱ2ιϱ1]+ρiiΔ(ϱ)ςiΓ(ϱ)[ιϱ2ιϱ1].

    So, as ι2ι1 we conclude that Ψ i(i(ι2)) Ψ i(i(ι1)),i=1,2. Consequently, Ψ is an equicontinuous operator. Thus, by the above obtained with the Arzelà–Ascoli theorem, we conclude that Ψ is completely continuous.

    Step 2: We shall prove that the set Φ is bounded, where

    Φ={(1,2,,n)H;i=αΨi(i(ι)),α(0,1)}.

    By (3.20), we have

    |MABIϱι[MABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)]|ΠϱΠηΥi. (3.21)

    In the same manner, we obtain

    MABIϱι|ρii|ρiΠϱi. (3.22)

    Thus, by (3.21) and (3.22) with (3.7), we get

    i=|αΨi(i(ι))|1ςi(MABIϱι[MABIηt|gi(ι,1,2,,n)|]+MABIϱι|ρii|)ρiςiΠϱi+ΠϱςiΠηΥi.

    Thus, we have

    (1,2,,2)ni=1ΠϱςiΠηΥi1Πϱmaxni=1{ρiςi}.

    Hence, Φ is bounded. Thus, by Leray-Schauder's alternative theorem, we conclude that the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) has a solution.

    Definition 3.6. [35] The n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is Hyers-Ulam stable if there exists constant ψ>0 such that, for each σ=maxni=1{σi}>0, and for each (1,2,,n)H satisfying the following inequality

    iΨi(i(ι))σi,i=1,2,,n, (3.23)

    there is a unique solution (ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn) of n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) with ˆi(ι)= Ψ i(ˆi(ι)) and

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)σψ. (3.24)

    The following definition of generalized Hyers-Ulam stability is obtained from Definition 3.6.

    Definition 3.7. [35] The n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is generalized Hyers-Ulam stable, if there exists a function ψC(R+,R+) with ψ(0)=0 such that, for each σ=maxni=1{σi}>0, and for each (1,2,,n)H satisfying (3.23), there is a unique solution (ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn) of n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) with ˆi(ι)= Ψ i(ˆi(ι)) and

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ψ(σ).

    Theorem 3.8. Under the condition (C2), if 0<Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})<1, then, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is Hyers-Ulam stable and is also generalized Hyers-Ulam stable.

    Proof. Let (1,2,,n)H such that iΨi(i(ι))σi,i=1,2,,n and let ˆi be a solution of the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1). Then, we have

    |Ψi(i(ι))Ψi(ˆi(ι))|=|MABIϱιMABIηtgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρiiςiMABIϱιMABIηtgi(ι,ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ρiˆiςi|1ςiMABIϱι[MABIηt|gi(ι,1,2,,n)gi(ι,ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)|]+1ςiMABIϱι[ρi|i(ι)ˆi(ι)|].

    By condition (C2), we have

    Ψi(i(ι))Ψi(ˆi(ι))1ςiΠϱΠηKi(1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)+ρiΠϱςiiˆi. (3.25)

    Thus, by (3.23), (3.24), and (3.25), via triangle inequality, we have

    iˆi=iΨi(i(ι))+Ψi(i(ι))ˆiiΨi(i(ι))+Ψi(i(ι))Ψi(ˆi(ι))σi+ΠϱΠηKiςi(1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)+ρiΠϱςiiˆi.

    Consequently,

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)=ni=1iˆiσi1Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi}). (3.26)

    We put ψ=11Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})>0 and σ=maxni=1{σi} in (3.26). Then, we get

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ψσ.

    Thus, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is Hyers-Ulam stable.

    Now, by assuming

    ψ(σi)=σi1Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi}),

    with ψ(0)=0, then the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is generalized Hyers-Ulam stable.

    To prove the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability, we assume that there is an increasing function χC(Ω,R+) and there is Δχ>0 such that MABIϱιχ(ι)=Δχχ(ι), for all ιΩ.

    Definition 3.9. [35] The n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable with respect to an increasing function χ(ι), if there exists constant ψ>0 such that, for each σ=maxni=1{σi}>0, and for each (1,2,,n)H satisfying the following inequality

    iΨi(i(ι))σiΔχχ(ι),i=1,2,,n, (3.27)

    there is a unique solution (ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn) of n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) with ˆi(ι)= Ψ i(ˆi(ι)) and

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ψσχ(ι). (3.28)

    Definition 3.10. [35] The n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable with respect to an increasing function χ(ι) if there exists constant ψ>0 such that, for each (1,2,,n)H satisfying (3.27), there is a unique solution (ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn) of n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) with

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ψχ(ι).

    The Ulam-Hyers-Rassias and generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability for n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is discussed in the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.11. Under the conditions in Theorem 3.2, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable and is also generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable.

    Proof. Let (1,2,,n)H satisfying (3.27) and let ˆi be a solution of the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1). Then, by (3.7), we have

    Ψi(i(ι))Ψi(ˆi(ι))1ςiΠϱΠηKi(1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)+ρiΠϱςiiˆi.

    Thus, by (3.27) and (3.28), via triangle inequality, we have

    iˆiiΨi(i(ι))+Ψi(i(ι))Ψi(ˆi(ι))σiΔχχ(ι)+ΠϱΠηKiςi(1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)+ρiΠϱςiiˆi.

    Consequently,

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)σiΔχχ(ι)1Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi}).

    Putting ψ=Δχ1Πϱni=11ςi(ΠηKi+maxni=1{ρi})>0 and σ=maxni=1{σi}, then (3.26) becomes

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ψσχ(ι).

    Thus, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable. Now, let σ=1. Then

    (1,2,,n)(ˆ1,ˆ2,,ˆn)ψχ(ι).

    Then, the n-coupled MABC-GSL system (1.1) is generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable.

    A numerical algorithm is a step-by-step procedure or a sequence of computational operations designed to solve a numerical problem or perform numerical computations. These algorithms often involve mathematical operations such as arithmetic calculations, numerical approximations, iterative methods, and numerical techniques for solving equations or systems of equations. They are implemented using programming languages and are executed on computers or other computational devices. Numerical algorithms aim to provide efficient and accurate solutions to numerical problems, taking into consideration factors such as computational complexity, numerical stability, convergence, and precision. They play a crucial role in various areas of scientific research, engineering design, data analysis, and computer simulations, enabling researchers and practitioners to solve complex mathematical problems and make quantitative predictions. For more information, see [1,2,20,30]. In this work, we apply Lagrange's interpolation technique to obtain a numerical algorithm for nonlinear MABC-GSL. Let us consider the MABC-GSL system (1.1) with fixed point i such that

    i(ι)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)(MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι))+ϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)ι0(ιs)ϱ1(MABIηιgi(s,1,2,,n)ρi(s)i(s)ςi(s))ds. (4.1)

    Define the nonlinear function Fi(ι,i(ι)),i=1,2,,n as

    Fi(ι,i(ι))=(MABIηιgi(ι,1,2,,n)ρi(ι)i(ι)ςi(ι)),

    where Fi(ι,i(ι))|ι=0=0. Thus (4.1) becomes

    i(ι)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)Fi(ι,i(ι))+ϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)ι0(ιs)ϱ1Fi(s,i(s))ds. (4.2)

    By discretizing Eq (4.2) at ι=ιm+1=(m+1)h, where h represents the time step size, we obtain the following discrete equations:

    i(ιm+1)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)Fi(ιm,i(ιm))+ϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)ιm+10(ιm+1s)ϱ1Fi(s,i(s))ds. (4.3)

    By the Lagrange's interpolation, we have

    Fi(ı,i(ı))=Fi(ın,i(ın)(ıın1)ıkık1Fi(ın1,i(ın1))(ıın)ıkık1=Fi(ın,i(ın))(ıın1)hFi(ın1,i(ın1)(ıın)h. (4.4)

    By the help of (4.3) and (4.4), we have

    i(ιm+1)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)Fi(ιm,i(ιm))+ϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)mn=1ın+1ın(ım+1s)ϱ1Fi(ın,i(ın)(sın1)hdsϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ)mn=1ın+1ın(ım+1s)ϱ1Fi(ın1,i(ın1)(sın)hds.

    Now, by computing the above two integrals separately, we get

    i(ιm+1)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)Fi(ιm,i(ιm))+ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1Fi(ın,i(ın)×[(mn+1)ϱ(2+mn+ϱ)(mn)ϱ(mn+2+2ϱ)]ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1Fi(ın1,i(ın1)×[(mn+1)ϱ+1(mn+1+ϱ)(mn)ϱ]. (4.5)

    In this subsection, we present the influenza epidemic model (SEIR) under the MABC fractional operator

    MABCDϱιS(ι)=α2NI(ι)S(ι)+α0Nα1S(ι), (4.6)
    MABCDϱιE(ι)=(α1+α3)E(ι)+α2NI(ι)S(ι), (4.7)
    MABCDϱιI(ι)=(α1+α4)I(ι)+α3E(ι), (4.8)
    MABCDϱιR(ι)=α1R(ι)+α4I(ι). (4.9)

    In the above (SEIR) model, the susceptible S compartment transitions to the exposed E compartment through effective contact transmission from infected individuals I at a rate of α2. In Eq (4.6): The term α2NI(ι)S(ι) represents the rate at which susceptible individuals get infected by coming into contact with infected individuals. The parameter α2 represents the transmission rate and N is the total population size. The term α0Nα1S(ι) represents the natural birth and death rates affecting the susceptible population. α0 is the natural birth rate, and α1 is the natural death rate. In Eq (4.7): The term (α1+α3)E(ι) represents the rate at which individuals in the exposed compartment transition to other compartments. The parameter α1 represents the natural death rate, and α3 represents the incubation rate. The term α2NI(ι)S(ι) represents the rate at which susceptible individuals become exposed by coming into contact with infected individuals. In Eq (4.8): The term (α1+α4)I(ι) represents the rate at which infected individuals recover or die. The parameter α1 is the natural death rate, and α4 is the recovery rate. The term α3E(ι) represents the rate at which individuals in the exposed compartment transition to the infected compartment. In Eq (4.9): The term α1R(ι) represents the rate at which recovered individuals experience natural death. α1 is the natural death rate. The term α4I(ι) represents the rate at which infected individuals recover. The model parameters are estimated using a fitting technique that makes use of the non-linear least squares algorithm [9], which are defined in Table 1.

    Table 1.  The parameters and their descriptions for the model under consideration.
    Parameter Description Numerical estimation Ref
    α0 The natural birth rate 0.001 Estimated
    α1 The natural death rate 0.001 Estimated
    α2 The transmission rate 0.98 Estimated
    α3 The incubation rate 0.78 Estimated
    α4 Recovery rate 0.62 Estimated

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We present the sensitivity indices of the parameters of the model given in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Presentation of sensitivity indices involved in the computation of R0.

    By (4.5), the numerical scheme of the (SEIR) model is given as follows:

    S(ιm+1)S(0)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)(α2NI(ιm)S(ιm)+α0Nα1S(ιm))+ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1(α2NI(ın)S(ın)+α0Nα1S(ın))×[(mn+1)ϱ(2+mn+ϱ)(mn)ϱ(mn+2+2ϱ)]ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1(α2NI(ın1)S(ın1)+α0Nα1S(ın1))×[(mn+1)ϱ+1(mn+1+ϱ)(mn)ϱ]. (4.10)
    E(ιm+1)E(0)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)((α1+α3)E(ιm)+α2NI(ιm)S(ιm))+ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1((α1+α3)E(ιn)+α2NI(ιn)S(ιn))×[(mn+1)ϱ(2+mn+ϱ)(mn)ϱ(mn+2+2ϱ)]ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1((α1+α3)E(ιn1)+α2NI(ιn1)S(ιn1))×[(mn+1)ϱ+1(mn+1+ϱ)(mn)ϱ]. (4.11)
    I(ιm+1)I(0)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)((α1+α4)I(ιm)+α3E(ιm))+ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1((α1+α4)I(ιn)+α3E(ιn))×[(mn+1)ϱ(2+mn+ϱ)(mn)ϱ(mn+2+2ϱ)]ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1((α1+α4)I(ιn1)+α3E(ιn1))×[(mn+1)ϱ+1(mn+1+ϱ)(mn)ϱ]. (4.12)
    R(ιm+1)R(0)=1ϱΔ(ϱ)(α1R(ιm)+α4I(ιm))+ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1(α1R(ιn)+α4I(ιn))×[(mn+1)ϱ(2+mn+ϱ)(mn)ϱ(mn+2+2ϱ)]ϱhϱΔ(ϱ)Γ(ϱ+2)mn=1(α1R(ιn1)+α4I(ιn1))×[(mn+1)ϱ+1(mn+1+ϱ)(mn)ϱ]. (4.13)

    For the initial conditions, we initialize the system as follows: N=48,000,000, S(0)=47,999,990,E(0)=3,I(0)=7, and R(0)=0.

    We have presented the numerical results for different compartments of the proposed model in Figures 213, respectively, by using three different sets of fractional orders. We see a decline in the susceptible class as shown in three different figures (Figures 2, 6, and 10) using various fractional order values. In the same way, we have shown the numerical results for an exposed class using three different sets of fractional order values in Figures 3, 7, and 11. Proceeding with the same procedures, we have presented numerically the graphical presentations of infected and recovered classes for various fractional order values in Figures 4, 8, and 12, and 5, 9, and 13, respectively.

    Figure 2.  Susceptible populations S for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 3.  Exposed populations E for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 4.  Infected populations I for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 5.  Recovered populations R for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 6.  Susceptible populations S for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 7.  Exposed populations E for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 8.  Infected populations I for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 9.  Recovered populations R for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 10.  Susceptible populations S for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 11.  Exposed populations E for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 12.  Infected populations I for different values of fractional orders.
    Figure 13.  Recovered populations R for different values of fractional orders.

    The findings from the sensitivity analysis of the fractional MABC-SEIR model provide valuable insights into the factors that influence the dynamics of influenza transmission. The identified sensitive parameters, including the natural birth rate, transmission rate, and incubation rate, play crucial roles in shaping the prevalence of influenza. It is important to accurately estimate these parameters, as even small changes in their values can have a substantial impact on the quantitative outcomes of the model. By identifying the sensitive parameters, this analysis highlights the importance of collecting accurate data and conducting precise estimations for these key factors. This information can aid in developing more effective strategies for controlling and managing the spread of influenza. Public health interventions can be designed to target these sensitive parameters, focusing on reducing the transmission rate, implementing preventive measures during the incubation period, and considering the demographic factors related to the birth rate.

    On the other hand, the insensitive parameters identified in the sensitivity analysis do not require precise estimation. Fluctuations in these parameters have minimal impact on the target variable, and therefore, their values can be approximated or assumed within a reasonable range without significantly affecting the model's predictive capabilities.

    Overall, the fractional MABC-SEIR model, coupled with sensitivity analysis, provides a promising approach for predicting confirmed influenza cases. It allows for a better understanding of the complex dynamics of influenza transmission and can assist in decision-making processes related to public health interventions, resource allocation, and outbreak management. However, it is important to note that the model's effectiveness relies heavily on the accuracy of parameter estimation and the availability of reliable data.

    In this work, we have conducted a comprehensive investigation into a system consisting of n-coupled equations, specifically generalized Sturm-Liouville and Langevin equations. The primary focus was on understanding the behavior of this system when subjected to a MABC fractional derivative. Through rigorous analysis, we have gained valuable insights into the dynamics of the system and the influence of the modified operator on the existence and uniqueness of solutions. To establish the uniqueness of solutions, we employed the Banach contraction principle, a powerful mathematical tool. Additionally, Leray-Schauder's alternative fixed-point theorem was utilized to determine the existence of solutions. This theorem provided a robust framework for examining the properties of the solutions within the system. Furthermore, we discussed the Hyers-Ulam stability of the system, enabling us to assess the stability properties of the solutions and evaluate their sensitivity to perturbations. By understanding the stability characteristics, we gained a deeper understanding of the overall behavior of the system and its response to external influences. In addition to the theoretical analysis, we applied the numerical scheme of MABC to model and simulate the influenza epidemic. This real-world application demonstrated the versatility and effectiveness of the MABC method. By successfully applying the MABC approach, we showcased its potential for capturing and predicting the dynamics of infectious diseases, offering valuable insights into the field of epidemiology. By combining these approaches, our study has made significant contributions to the understanding of the behavior of n-coupled systems under a MABC fractional derivative. We have provided insights into the dynamics of the system, the uniqueness of solutions, the stability properties, and the practical applications in epidemiology. This research expands the current knowledge in the field and serves as a foundation for further investigations and advancements in related areas. In future research, a natural extension of this work would be to analyze systems of delay equations under the influence of the piecewise MABC fractional operator. This extension would allow for a deeper exploration of the behavior of systems with time delays, providing further insights into complex dynamical phenomena.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number: ISP23-86.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



    [1] H. Ahmad, M. N. Khan, I. Ahmad, M. Omri, M. F. Alotaibi, A meshless method for numerical solutions of linear and nonlinear time-fractional Black-Scholes models, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 19677–19698. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.20231003 doi: 10.3934/math.20231003
    [2] H. Ahmad, D. U. Ozsahin, U. Farooq, M. A. Fahmy, M. D. Albalwi, H. Abu-Zinadah, Comparative analysis of new approximate analytical method and Mohand variational transform method for the solution of wave-like equations with variable coefficients, Results Phys., 51 (2023), 106623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106623 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106623
    [3] A. A. H. Ahmadini, M. Khuddush, S. N. Rao, Multiple positive solutions for a system of fractional order BVP with p-Laplacian operators and parameters, Axiom, 12 (2023), 974. http://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12100974 doi: 10.3390/axioms12100974
    [4] K. A. Aldwoah, M. A. Almalahi, M. A. Abdulwasaa, K. Shah, S. V. Kawale, M. Awadalla, et al., Mathematical analysis and numerical simulations of the piecewise dynamics model of Malaria transmission: A case study in Yemen, AIMS Mathematics, 9 (2024), 4376–4408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2024216 doi: 10.3934/math.2024216
    [5] K. A. Aldwoah, M. A. Almalahi, K. Shah, Theoretical and numerical simulations on the hepatitis B virus model through a piecewise fractional order, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 844. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7120844 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7120844
    [6] M. A. Almalahi, S. K. Panchal, W. Shatanawi, M. S. Abdo, K. Shah, K. Abodayeh, Analytical study of transmission dynamics of 2019-nCoV pandemic via fractal fractional operator, Results Phys., 24 (2021), 104045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104045 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104045
    [7] M. Al-Refai, Proper inverse operators of fractional derivatives with nonsingular kernels, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, II. Ser., 71 (2022), 525–535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12215-021-00638-2 doi: 10.1007/s12215-021-00638-2
    [8] M. Al-Refai, D. Baleanu, On an extension of the operator with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22401296 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22401296
    [9] S. M. Alzahrani, R. Saadeh, M. A. Abdoon, A. Qazza, F. El Guma, M. Berir, Numerical simulation of an influenza epidemic: Prediction with fractional SEIR and the ARIMA model, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 18 (2024), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/180101 doi: 10.18576/amis/180101
    [10] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Thermal Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
    [11] D. Baleanu, J. Alzabut, J. M. Jonnalagadda, Y. Adjabi, M. M. Matar, A coupled system of generalized Sturm-Liouville problems and Langevin fractional differential equations in the framework of nonlocal and nonsingular derivatives, Adv. Differ. Equ., 239 (2020), 239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02690-1 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02690-1
    [12] I. M. Batiha, A. Ouannas, R. Albadarneh, A. A. Al-Nana, S. Momani, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for generalized Sturm-Liouville and Langevin equations via Caputo-Hadamard fractional-order operator, Eng. Comput., 39 (2022), 2581–2603. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-07-2021-0393 doi: 10.1108/EC-07-2021-0393
    [13] A. Boutiara, M. S. Abdo, M. A. Almalahi, K. Shah, B. Abdalla, T. Abdeljawad, Study of Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems with p-Laplacian by using generalized form of fractional order derivative, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 18360–18376. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.20221011 doi: 10.3934/math.20221011
    [14] A. Boutiara, M. Benbachir, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, Kuratowski MNC method on a generalized fractional Caputo Sturm-Liouville-Langevin q-difference problem with generalized Ulam-Hyers stability, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03619-y doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03619-y
    [15] A. Ercan, Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 13325–13343. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022736 doi: 10.3934/math.2022736
    [16] A. Berhail, N. Tabouche, M. M. Matar, J. Alzabut, Boundary value problem defined by system of generalized Sturm-Liouville and Langevin Hadamard fractional differential equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.6507
    [17] K. S. Eiman, M. Sarwar, T. Abdeljawad, On rotavirus infectious disease model using piecewise modified ABC fractional order derivative, Netw. Heterog. Media, 19 (2024), 214–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/nhm.2024010 doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024010
    [18] R. Gorenflo, A. A. Kilbas, F. Mainardi, S. V. Rogosin, Mittag-Leffler functions, related topics and applications, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 2014.
    [19] A. Granas, J. Dugundji, Fixed point theory, New York: Springer, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21593-8
    [20] T. Guo, O. Nikan, Z. Avazzadeh, W. Qiu, Efficient alternating direction implicit numerical approaches for multi-dimensional distributed-order fractional integro differential problems, Comput. Appl. Math., 41 (2022), 236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-01934-y doi: 10.1007/s40314-022-01934-y
    [21] R. Khalil, M. Al Horani, A. Yousef, M. Sababheh, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 264 (2014), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002
    [22] H. Khan, J. Alzabut, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, A. Alkhazan, Essential criteria for existence of solution of a modified-ABC fractional order smoking model, Ain Shams Eng. J., 15 (2024), 102646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102646 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102646
    [23] H. Khan, J. Alzabut, W. F. Alfwzan, H. Gulzar, Nonlinear dynamics of a piecewise modified ABC fractional-order leukemia model with symmetric numerical simulations, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 1338. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15071338 doi: 10.3390/sym15071338
    [24] H. Khan, J. Alzabut, H. Gulzar, Existence of solutions for hybrid modified ABC-fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian operator and an application to a waterborne disease model, Alex. Eng. J., 70 (2023), 665–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.02.045 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.02.045
    [25] H. Khan, J. Alzabut, D. Baleanu, G. Alobaidi, M. U. Rehman, Existence of solutions and a numerical scheme for a generalized hybrid class of n-coupled modified ABC-fractional differential equations with an application, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 6609–6625. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023334 doi: 10.3934/math.2023334
    [26] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, 204 (2006), 1–523.
    [27] W. Li, J. Ji, L. Huang, L. Zhang, Global dynamics and control of malicious signal transmission in wireless sensor networks, Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst., 48 (2023), 101324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nahs.2022.101324 doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2022.101324
    [28] L. J. Muhammad, E. A. Algehyne, S. S. Usman, A. Ahmad, C. Chakraborty, I. A. Mohammed, Supervised machine learning models for prediction of COVID-19 infection using epidemiology dataset, SN Comput. Sci., 2 (2021), 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00394-7 doi: 10.1007/s42979-020-00394-7
    [29] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, Elsevier, 198 (1998), 1–340.
    [30] M. Rafiq, K. Muhammad, H. Ahmad, A. Saliu, Critical analysis for nonlinear oscillations by least square, Sci. Rep., 14 (2024), 1456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51706-3 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51706-3
    [31] M. ur Rahman, M. Yavuz, M. Arfan, A. Sami, Theoretical and numerical investigation of a modified ABC fractional operator for the spread of polio under the effect of vaccination, AIMS Biophys., 11 (2024), 97–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2024007 doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024007
    [32] S. N. Rao, M. Alesemi, On a coupled system of fractional differential equations with nonlocal non-separated boundary conditions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2019 (2019), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2035-2 doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2035-2
    [33] H. O. Sidi, M. J. Huntul, M. O. Sidi, H. Emadifar, Identifying an unknown coefficient in the fractional parabolic differential equation, Results Appl. Math., 19 (2023), 100356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinam.2023.100386 doi: 10.1016/j.rinam.2023.100386
    [34] D. R. Smart, Fixed point theorems, CUP Archive, 1980.
    [35] C. Urs, Coupled fixed point theorems and applications to periodic boundary value problems, Miskolc Math. Notes, 14 (2013), 323–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.18514/MMN.2013.598 doi: 10.18514/MMN.2013.598
    [36] B. Wang, Q. Zhu, S. Li, Stabilization of discrete-time hidden semi-Markov jump linear systems with partly unknown emission probability matrix, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 99 (2023), 1952–1959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2023.3272190 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2023.3272190
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mohammed A. Almalahi, Khaled Aldowah, Faez Alqarni, Manel Hleili, Kamal Shah, Fathea M. O. Birkea, On modified Mittag–Leffler coupled hybrid fractional system constrained by Dhage hybrid fixed point in Banach algebra, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-81568-8
    2. Yasir A. Madani, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Osman Osman, Blgys Muflh, Khaled Aldwoah, Khidir Shaib Mohamed, Nidal Eljaneid, Analysis of an Acute Diarrhea Piecewise Modified ABC Fractional Model: Optimal Control, Stability and Simulation, 2025, 9, 2504-3110, 68, 10.3390/fractalfract9020068
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(944) PDF downloads(56) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(13)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog