One kind of stochastic delay differential equation in which the delay term is dependent on a proportion of the current time is the pantograph stochastic differential equation. Electric current collection, nonlinear dynamics, quantum mechanics, and electrodynamics are among the phenomena modeled using this equation. A key idea in physics and mathematics is the well-posedness of a differential equation, which guarantees that the solution to the problem exists and is a unique and meaningful solution that relies continuously on the initial condition and the value of the fractional derivative. Ulam-Hyers stability is a property of equations that states that if a function is approximately satisfying the equation, then there exists an exact solution that is close to the function. Inspired by these findings, in this research work, we established the Ulam-Hyers stability and well-posedness of solutions of pantograph fractional stochastic differential equations (PFSDEs) in the framework of conformable derivatives. In addition, we provided examples to analyze the theoretical results.
Citation: Wedad Albalawi, Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Fahim Ud Din, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty. Well-posedness and Ulam-Hyers stability results of solutions to pantograph fractional stochastic differential equations in the sense of conformable derivatives[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12375-12398. doi: 10.3934/math.2024605
[1] | Abdelbaki Choucha, Salah Boulaaras, Asma Alharbi . Global existence and asymptotic behavior for a viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation with a logarithmic nonlinearity, distributed delay and Balakrishnan-Taylor damping terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4517-4539. doi: 10.3934/math.2022252 |
[2] | Hicham Saber, Fares Yazid, Fatima Siham Djeradi, Mohamed Bouye, Khaled Zennir . Decay for thermoelastic laminated beam with nonlinear delay and nonlinear structural damping. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6916-6932. doi: 10.3934/math.2024337 |
[3] | Abdelkader Moumen, Fares Yazid, Fatima Siham Djeradi, Moheddine Imsatfia, Tayeb Mahrouz, Keltoum Bouhali . The influence of damping on the asymptotic behavior of solution for laminated beam. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22602-22626. doi: 10.3934/math.20241101 |
[4] | Keltoum Bouhali, Sulima Ahmed Zubair, Wiem Abedelmonem Salah Ben Khalifa, Najla ELzein AbuKaswi Osman, Khaled Zennir . A new strict decay rate for systems of longitudinal m-nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 962-976. doi: 10.3934/math.2023046 |
[5] | Abdelkader Moumen, Abderrahmane Beniani, Tariq Alraqad, Hicham Saber, Ekram. E. Ali, Keltoum Bouhali, Khaled Zennir . Energy decay of solution for nonlinear delayed transmission problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13815-13829. doi: 10.3934/math.2023707 |
[6] | Qian Li . General and optimal decay rates for a viscoelastic wave equation with strong damping. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18282-18296. doi: 10.3934/math.20221006 |
[7] | Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Mohammad Kafini . Asymptotic behavior of the wave equation solution with nonlinear boundary damping and source term of variable exponent-type. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30638-30654. doi: 10.3934/math.20241479 |
[8] | Soh E. Mukiawa, Tijani A. Apalara, Salim A. Messaoudi . Stability rate of a thermoelastic laminated beam: Case of equal-wave speed and nonequal-wave speed of propagation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 333-361. doi: 10.3934/math.2021021 |
[9] | Mohamed Biomy . Decay rate for systems of m-nonlinear wave equations with new viscoelastic structures. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5502-5517. doi: 10.3934/math.2021326 |
[10] | Fatima Siham Djeradi, Fares Yazid, Svetlin G. Georgiev, Zayd Hajjej, Khaled Zennir . On the time decay for a thermoelastic laminated beam with microtemperature effects, nonlinear weight, and nonlinear time-varying delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26096-26114. doi: 10.3934/math.20231330 |
One kind of stochastic delay differential equation in which the delay term is dependent on a proportion of the current time is the pantograph stochastic differential equation. Electric current collection, nonlinear dynamics, quantum mechanics, and electrodynamics are among the phenomena modeled using this equation. A key idea in physics and mathematics is the well-posedness of a differential equation, which guarantees that the solution to the problem exists and is a unique and meaningful solution that relies continuously on the initial condition and the value of the fractional derivative. Ulam-Hyers stability is a property of equations that states that if a function is approximately satisfying the equation, then there exists an exact solution that is close to the function. Inspired by these findings, in this research work, we established the Ulam-Hyers stability and well-posedness of solutions of pantograph fractional stochastic differential equations (PFSDEs) in the framework of conformable derivatives. In addition, we provided examples to analyze the theoretical results.
Various mathematical disciplines, including enumerative combinatorics, algebraic combinatorics and applied mathematics, exhibit a keen interest in sequences of polynomials. For example, the utilization of Laguerre, Chebyshev, Legendre and Jacobi polynomials in solving specific ordinary differential equations within the realms of approximation theory and physics is well-documented. Hermite polynomials stand out as a significant subset within the family of polynomial sequences. The significance of Hermite polynomials lies in their versatility and wide-ranging applications across many fields of mathematics and science. They provide a powerful tool for solving problems and modeling complex systems, making them an essential part of many mathematical and scientific disciplines. The group of orthogonal polynomials known as Hermite polynomials was first developed by Hermite himself [1]. The Hermite polynomials are valuable because they possess various beneficial characteristics. One of their applications is to provide solutions to the Schrödinger equation and quantum harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics. Additionally, they emerge in the study of random processes, particularly in the theory of Brownian motion. These polynomials find uses in numerical analysis, approximation theory and signal processing. They are commonly applied in the approximation of functions and the resolution of differential equations. These polynomials find applications in a wide range of fields, including mathematics, physics, engineering, and computer science. Hermite polynomials, for instance, play a crucial role in describing the wave functions of harmonic oscillators, forming the foundation for quantum theories related to light and research on hydrogen atoms. Furthermore, these polynomials are instrumental in deriving probability distribution functions for the kinetic energy of gas molecules and in analyzing the energy distribution of harmonic oscillators. {Hermite polynomials find applications in computer science in various areas, especially in numerical methods, signal processing and computer vision. Hermite polynomials can be utilized in image and signal processing tasks, such as image compression, denoising and feature extraction. They have been used in wavelet transforms, where the polynomials form a basis set to represent signals or images in a sparse and efficient manner. Further, they are used in interpolation, which involves fitting a polynomial that passes through a set of given points and their corresponding derivatives. This can be useful for curve fitting, data smoothing and generating continuous functions from discrete data in computer graphics and animation. Also, these polynomials are employed in numerical methods for solving differential equations, integral equations and other mathematical problems that arise in computer simulations, scientific computing and computational modeling. In probability theory, Hermite polynomials are used in the context of the Hermite polynomial chaos expansion, which is a powerful tool for uncertainty quantification and propagation in computational models and simulations involving stochastic processes, see for example [2,3,4,5,6].
The significance of Hermite polynomials relies on their powerful properties. One of these properties is completeness, which means the possibility of representing any square-integrable real function in terms of a series of Hermite polynomials. These polynomials have significant applications in different fields of science, such as approximation theory and numerical analysis. Furthermore, they play a vital role in quantum mechanics, where they are considered a solution of the harmonic oscillator given in the Schrödinger equation. Moreover, they are efficient in studying random walks and Brownian motion. The Hermite polynomials also have applications in the biological and medical sciences. Numerous research endeavors have been dedicated to the development and exploration of distinctive features of degenerate special polynomials. This has been evidenced in studies such as [7,8,9,10,11,12]. More recently, in references [13,14,15,16,17], the authors introduced several doped polynomials of a specific nature and identified their unique characteristics and behaviors, which hold significant importance in engineering applications. These noteworthy properties encompass determinant representations, operational formalism, approximation attributes, Δh polynomial formulations, poly forms, degenerate configurations, summation theorems, approximation precision, explicit and implicit equations, and generative expressions.
Datolli [18] introduced the Hermite polynomials of three variables by the generating form:
∞∑k=0Hk(u,v,w)ξkk!=euξ+vξ2+wξ3. | (1.1) |
Exploring the degenerate manifestations of special functions holds a pivotal role in unraveling the mathematical underpinnings of various physical phenomena. These degenerate polynomials play a vital role in elucidating the dynamics of the quantum harmonic oscillator. Their versatile applications span the realms of science and engineering, with their value acknowledged in both theoretical mathematics and real-world implementations. As the theory of special functions advances, we anticipate future revelations and innovations on the horizon.
In the past few years, Ryoo and Hwang [8,9] proposed two and three variable degenerate forms of Hermite polynomials:
∞∑k=0Jk(u,v;ϑ)tkk!=(1+ϑ)t(u+vtϑ) | (1.2) |
and
∞∑k=0Fk(u,v,w;ϑ)tkk!=(1+ϑ)t(u+vt+wt2ϑ). | (1.3) |
In 1941, Steffenson [19] introduced the notion of Poweriod, where he presented the idea of monomiality. This idea was further developed by Dattoli [20,21] and it has now evolved into a key instrument for the investigation of exceptional polynomials. Monomiality is the concept of expressing a polynomial set in view of monomials, which are the fundamental units of polynomials which enables a clear knowledge of the nurture and properties of these polynomials.
In the study of special polynomials, the two operators ˆM and ˆD are very important. They perform as multiplicative and derivative operators for bk(ξ),k∈N polynomial set, which allow constructing new polynomials using some existing ones. Note that the multiplicative property of the operator ˆM is defines as
bk+1(ξ)=ˆM{bk(ξ)}, | (1.4) |
which generates a new polynomial bk+1(ξ) from bk(ξ). In the same way, the relation
kbk−1(ξ)=ˆD{bk(ξ)}, | (1.5) |
provides the derivative property of the operator ˆD.
Incorporating the fundamental principle of monomiality and operational rules into the examination of special polynomials offers a promising avenue for the creation of hybrid special polynomials. These hybrid polynomials serve as solutions to a wide array of mathematical challenges and have a significant impact on various applications in physics, engineering and computer science. The properties of special polynomials, such as orthogonality, interpolation and recursive relationships, make them valuable tools for solving a wide range of computational problems in computer economics. Their ability to approximate complex functions and represent economic data efficiently helps in understanding economic phenomena, making predictions and supporting decision-making processes. Researchers and practitioners continue to explore new ways to apply special polynomials to address emerging challenges in the field of computer economics, see for example [6,22,23,24,25].
The Eqs (1.4) and (1.5) are part of the theory of quasi-monomials and Weyl groups, which have applications in various branches of mathematical physics, such as the representation theory, algebraic geometry and quantum field theory. Therefore, a set of polynomials {bk(ξ)}m∈N in view of operators represented by expressions (1.4) and (1.5) is mentioned by name quasi-monomial and fulfills the axiom:
[ˆD,ˆM]=ˆDˆM−ˆMˆD=ˆ1, | (1.6) |
thus presents a Weyl group structure.
In specific, bk(ξ) is a solution to the differential equation described by:
ˆMˆD{bk(ξ)}=kbk(ξ), | (1.7) |
where the operators ˆM and ˆD are subject to differential recognition. This equation implies that the quasi-monomials act as eigenfunctions of the operator ˆMˆD with an associated eigenvalue of k. For certain selections of ˆM and ˆD, this differential equation can be explicitly solved, leading to clear expressions for the quasi-monomials, represented as:
bk(ξ)=ˆMk{1}, | (1.8) |
with the initial condition b0(ξ)=1. Equation (1.8) offers a recursive method for calculating the quasi-monomials through iterative application of the operator ˆM to the identity operator ˆI. Given the initial condition b0(ξ)=1, bk(λ) in exponential form can be expressed as:
ewˆM{1}=∞∑k=0bk(ξ)wkk!,|w|<∞, | (1.9) |
by usage of identity (1.8).
The formula (1.9) serves as a generating formula that represents the quasi-monomials as a power series in the variable w, with the coefficients being determined by the quasi-monomials themselves. This formula facilitates the precise computation of quasi-monomials and finds applications in the examination of specific classes of special functions. Generally, the quasi-monomials theory and Weyl groups are employed to analyze the characterizations of certain functions and have many applications in mathematical physics [26,27,28].
The recent advancement in the theory of special functions has led to the development of multi-variable and multi-index special functions. These functions involve several variables and multiple indices, which provide a more flexible and efficient way of solving complex problems. Multi-variable special functions are useful for solving problems in quantum mechanics, statistical physics, and fluid dynamics, among others. They have wide-ranging applications in several fields, including engineering, computer science, and finance [2,5,29,30].
In light of the importance of these degenerate special polynomials of mathematical physics and motivated by the previous discussion, we construct a multidimensional degenerate form of Hermite polynomials, which can be expressed in the following generating formula:
(1+ϑ)ξ(j1+j2ξ+j3ξ2+⋯+jnξn−1ϑ)=∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn!. | (1.10) |
Accordingly, we study and derive their characterization. The paper is organized into several sections, each of which focuses on a different aspect of degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials. Section 2 provides an in-depth analysis of the structure of these polynomials and examines their fundamental properties. This section is crucial for establishing a solid foundation upon which subsequent sections can build. Further, the quasi-monomial properties of the degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials are derived. These properties are essential for understanding how polynomials behave and can be used in various applications. Section 3 is devoted to the establishment of symmetric identities that are fulfilled by these polynomials. The identification of these identities is a critical step in furthering our understanding of these polynomials and their properties. In Section 4, operational formalism is introduced, which provides a powerful tool for deriving the extended and generalized forms of these polynomials. This section is significant because it enables mathematicians to explore the behavior of polynomials in new and previously unexplored ways. Finally, the paper concludes with a summary of the findings presented in the previous sections. Together, the sections build upon one another to provide a comprehensive overview of degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials and their properties, making a significant contribution to the field of mathematics.
The new class of degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials is examined in this section. Moreover, these polynomials are also produced with a number of properties. We defined degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials by the generating relation:
(1+ϑ)ξ(j1+j2ξ+j3ξ2+⋯+jnξn−1ϑ)=∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn! | (2.1) |
or
(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ=∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn!. | (2.2) |
Theorem 2.1. The degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ), n∈N can be determined in terms of the power series expansion of the product (1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ, that is
(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ=H[r]0(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)+H[r]1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξ1!+H[r]2(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξ22!+⋯+H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξmm!+⋯. | (2.3) |
Proof. Using the Newton series for finite differences at j1=j2=⋯=jr=0 and ordering the product of the functions (1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ according to the powers of ξ, we obtain a series of special polynomials denoted by H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ). These polynomials are expressed in Eq (2.3) as coefficients of ξmm!, and they serve as the generating function for degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials.
Next, we find the explicit form satisfied by the degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ), n∈N by proving the succeeding result:
Theorem 2.2. The degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ), n∈N satisfy the succeeding explicit form:
H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=n![nk]∑k=0(jrϑlog(1+ϑ))kH[r]n−kr(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr−1;ϑ)k!(n−rk)!. | (2.4) |
Proof. The generating function (2.2) can be written as:
{(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ}=∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr−1;ϑ)ξnn!∞∑k=0(jrϑlog(1+ϑ))kξrkk!. | (2.5) |
substituting n→n−rk in the right hand side of previous expression and using the Cauchy product rule in the resultant expression, result (2.2) is proved.
Further, we establish the multiplicative and derivative operators for degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ), by proving the results listed as follows:
Theorem 2.3. For DMVHP H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ), the following multiplicative and derivative operators hold true:
^MH[r]=(j1log(1+ϑ)ϑ+2j2∂∂j1+3j3(ϑlog(1+ϑ))∂2∂j21+⋯+rjr(ϑlog(1+ϑ))r−1∂r−1∂jr−11) | (2.6) |
and
^DH[r]=ϑlog(1+ϑ)Dj1. | (2.7) |
Proof. Differentiating (2.2) with respect to j1 partially, we find
∂∂j1{(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ}=ξϑlog(1+ϑ){(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ}. | (2.8) |
Thus (2.8) can be written in the form of identity as
ϑlog(1+ϑ)∂∂j1{(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ}=ξ{(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ} | (2.9) |
and further simplified in the form
ϑlog(1+ϑ)∂∂j1{∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn!}=ξ{∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn!}. | (2.10) |
On taking partial differentiation of (2.2) on both sides w.r.t. ξ, it follows that
∂∂ξ{(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ}=∂∂ξ{∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn!}, | (2.11) |
which further can be written as
(j1ϑ+2j2ϑξ+3j3ϑξ2+⋯+rjrϑξr−1){(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ}=∞∑n=0nH[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξn−1n!. | (2.12) |
Thus, in view of expression (2.10), expression (2.12) can be written as
(j1ϑ+2j2log(1+ϑ)∂∂j1+3j3ϑ(log(1+ϑ))2∂2∂j12+⋯+rjrϑr−2(log(1+ϑ))r−1){(1+ϑ)j1ξϑ(1+ϑ)j2ξ2ϑ×(1+ϑ)j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)jrξrϑ}=∞∑n=0nH[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξn−1n!. | (2.13) |
Inserting the r.h.s. of (2.2) on the r.h.s. of previous expression and simplifying, we obtain
(j1log(1+ϑ)ϑ+2j2∂∂j1+3j3(ϑlog(1+ϑ))∂2∂j12+⋯+rjr(ϑlog(1+ϑ))r−2∂r−1∂j1r−1)×{∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn!}=∞∑n=0nH[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξn−1n!. | (2.14) |
For, n→n+1 in the r.h.s. of (2.14) and comparing exponents of ξnn!, assertion (2.6) is obtained.
Moreover, in view of identity expression (2.10), we find
ϑlog(1+ϑ)∂∂j1{∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξnn!}={∞∑n=0H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)ξn+1n!}. | (2.15) |
For, n→n−1 in r.h.s. of above expression (2.15) and comparing exponents of ξnn!, assertion (2.7) is obtained.
Next, we establish the differential equation satisfied by DMVHP H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ) by demonstrating the result listed below:
Theorem 2.4. The DMVHP H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ) satisfies the differential equation:
(j1log(1+ϑ)ϑ∂∂j1+2j2∂2∂j12+3j3(ϑlog(1+ϑ))∂3∂j31+⋯+rjr(ϑlog(1+ϑ))r−1∂r∂jr1−nlog(1+ϑ)ϑ)=0. | (2.16) |
Proof. By operation of expressions (2.6) and (2.7), and in view of expression (1.7), assertion (2.16) is verified.
In the current section, we establish the symmetrical relations for the DMVHP H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ) by demonstrating the result listed below:
Theorem 3.1. For, A≠B, with A,B>0, it follows that:
AnH[r]n(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr;ϑ)=BnH[r]n(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr;ϑ). | (3.1) |
Proof. Given that A≠B, with A,B>0, we proceed in the manner designated as:
R(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=(1+ϑ)ABj1ξϑ(1+ϑ)A2B2j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)A3B3j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)ArBrjrξrϑ. | (3.2) |
Thus, the previous expression (3.2) R(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ) is symmetric in A and B.
Consequently, we write
R(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=H[r]n(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr;ϑ)(Bξ)nn!=BnH[r]n(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr;ϑ)ξnn!. | (3.3) |
Therefore, it follows that
R(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=H[r]n(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr;ϑ)(Aξ)nn!=AnH[r]n(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr;ϑ)ξnn!. | (3.4) |
On comparing the exponents of same powers of ξ in the previous expressions (3.3) and (3.4), the assertion (3.1) is achieved.
Theorem 3.2. For, A≠B, with A,B>0, we find
n∑k=0k∑m=0(nk)(km)AkBn+1−kH[r]k−m(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr;ϑ)Pn−k(A−1;ϑ)= |
n∑k=0k∑m=0(nk)(km)BkAn+1−kH[r]k−m(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr;ϑ)Pn−k(B−1;ϑ). | (3.5) |
Proof. As it is given that A≠B, with A,B>0, we proceed by manner designated as:
S(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=ABξ(1+ϑ)ABj1ξϑ(1+ϑ)A2B2j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)A3B3j3ξ3ϑ⋯×(1+ϑ)ArBrjrξrϑ((1+ϑ)ABξϑ−1)((1+ϑ)Aξϑ−1)((1+ϑ)Bξϑ−1). | (3.6) |
By continuing in the same manner as in the above theorem, assertion (3.5) is proved.
Theorem 3.3. For, A≠B, with A,B>0, we find
AnH[r]n(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr)=BnH[r]n(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr). | (3.7) |
Proof. As far as A≠B, with A,B>0, we proceed in the manner designated as:
G(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=(1+ϑ)ABj1ξϑ(1+ϑ)A2B2j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)A3B3j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)ArBrjrξrϑ. | (3.8) |
Thus, the expression (3.7) G(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ) is symmetric in A and B.
Theorem 3.4. For, A≠B, with A,B>0, we find
n∑k=0k∑m=0(nk)(km)AkBn+1−kBn(ϑ)H[r]k−m(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr;ϑ)σn−k(A−1;ϑ)= |
n∑k=0k∑m=0(nk)(km)BkAn+1−kBn(ϑ)H[r]k−m(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr;ϑ)σn−k(B−1;ϑ). | (3.9) |
Proof.
G(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=ABξ(1+ϑ)ABj1ξϑ(1+ϑ)A2B2j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)A3B3j3ξ3ϑ⋯(1+ϑ)ArBrjrξrϑ×((1+ϑ)ABξϑ−1)((1+ϑ)Aξϑ−1)((1+ϑ)Bξϑ−1). | (3.10) |
The above expression (3.10) can be expressed as
G(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=ABξ((1+ϑ)Aξϑ−1)(1+ϑ)ABj1ξϑ(1+ϑ)A2B2j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)A3B3j3ξ3ϑ×⋯(1+ϑ)ArBrjrξrϑ((1+ϑ)ABξϑ−1)((1+ϑ)Bξϑ−1)=B∞∑m=0Bm(ϑ)(Aξ)mm!∞∑k=0H[r]k(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr;ϑ)(Aξ)kk!∞∑n=0σn(A−1;ϑ)(Bξ)nn!=∞∑n=0[∑nk=0∑km=0(nk)(km)AkBn+1−kBn(ϑ)H[r]k−m(Bj1,B2j2,B3j3,⋯,Brjr;ϑ)σn−k(A−1;ϑ)]ξnn!. | (3.11) |
In the similar fashion we can write
G(ξ;j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=ABξ((1+ϑ)Bξϑ−1)(1+ϑ)ABj1ξϑ(1+ϑ)A2B2j2ξ2ϑ(1+ϑ)A3B3j3ξ3ϑ×⋯(1+ϑ)ArBrjrξrϑ((1+ϑ)ABξϑ−1)((1+ϑ)Aξϑ−1)=A∞∑m=0Bm(ϑ)(Bξ)mm!∞∑k=0H[r]k(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr;ϑ)(Bξ)kk!∞∑n=0σn(B−1;ϑ)(Aξ)nn!=∞∑n=0[∑nk=0∑km=0(nk)(km)BkAn+1−kBn(ϑ)H[r]k−m(Aj1,A2j2,A3j3,⋯,Arjr;ϑ)σn−k(B−1;ϑ)]ξnn!. | (3.12) |
Comparing the same exponents of expression (3.11) and (3.12), assertion (3.9) is established.
Operational techniques are indeed powerful tools used to generate new families of polynomials, especially in the context of doped-type polynomials. These techniques involve applying certain differential or difference operators to a given parental polynomial, which yields a new polynomial with related properties. These operators can be used to generate families of orthogonal polynomials that are related to classical orthogonal polynomials but possess additional symmetries. Furthermore, operational techniques are useful in umbral calculus, which involves introducing a new variable that satisfies certain algebraic properties. This allows for the construction of new polynomial families that are related to classical polynomials, but with additional properties. For instance, the Bernoulli polynomials can be written in terms of an umbral variable, which allows for the construction of new families of polynomials known as the Sheffer sequences. Thus, operational techniques are powerful tools for generating new families of polynomials that have properties related to the parental polynomial, and they have important applications in a variety of mathematical and physical contexts.
Differentiating successively (2.2) w.r.t. j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr, we find
Dj1{H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=log(1+ϑ)ϑn{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}, | (4.1) |
D2j1{H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=(log(1+ϑ)ϑ)2n(n−1){H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}, | (4.2) |
D3j1{H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=(log(1+ϑ)ϑ)3n(n−1)(n−2){H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}, | (4.3) |
⋮⋮ |
Drj1{H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=(log(1+ϑ)ϑ)rn(n−1)(n−2)⋯(n−r+1)×{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}. | (4.4) |
Also,
Dj2{H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=log(1+ϑ)ϑn(n−1){H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}, | (4.5) |
Dj3{H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=log(1+ϑ)ϑn(n−1)(n−2){H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)} | (4.6) |
⋮⋮ |
Djr{H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=log(1+ϑ)ϑn(n−1)(n−2)⋯(n−r+1){H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)} | (4.7) |
respectively.
In consideration of Eqs (4.1)–(4.7), it follows that H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ) are the solutions of the equations:
ϑlog(1+ϑ)D2j1{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=Dj2{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}, | (4.8) |
(ϑlog(1+ϑ))2D3j1{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=Dj3{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)} | (4.9) |
⋮⋮ |
and
(ϑlog(1+ϑ))r−1Drj1{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)}=Djr{H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)} | (4.10) |
respectively, under the following initial condition
H[r]n(j1,0,0,⋯,0;ϑ)=Hn(j1;ϑ). | (4.11) |
Therefore, in view of expressions (4.8)–(4.11), it follows that
H[r]n−1(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ)=exp(j2ϑlog(1+ϑ)D2j1+j3(ϑlog(1+ϑ))2D3j1+⋯+jr(ϑlog(1+ϑ))r−1Drj1){Hn(j1;ϑ)}. | (4.12) |
Given the aforementioned perspective, it is possible to use the operational rule (4.12) to create the polynomials H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ) from the degenerate polynomials Hn(j1;ϑ).
The study successfully provides and develops a novel set of degenerate multidimensional Hermite polynomials (DMVHP) denoted as H[r]n(j1,j2,j3,⋯,jr;ϑ). These polynomials are closely linked to the classical Hermite polynomials. The generating function for these polynomials is given in Theorem 2.1. The development of these polynomials is achieved by utilizing the monomiality principle and operational formalism, which allows for the exploration of new outcomes while maintaining consistency with existing knowledge. The quasi-monomial properties are given in the form of Theorem 2.2 and differential equation as Theorem 2.3. The Results 2.2 and 2.3 verifies the quasi-monomial properties. Furthermore, we establish the fundamental properties of the DMVHP, including symmetric identities, thereby enhancing our understanding of their behavior and mathematical characteristics. The introduction of an operational framework produced in Section 4 for these polynomials provides a useful tool for further research and applications in various fields. Therefore, this research contributes to the advancement of special polynomials and opens up new avenues for exploring their applications in mathematics, physics, engineering, and other related disciplines. The DMVHP and their properties established in this study add valuable knowledge to the existing literature, and they have the potential to facilitate future investigations in various mathematical and scientific contexts.
The operational formalism discussed earlier has significant implications for future research in mathematics. One area that can benefit from this approach is the derivation of extended and generalized forms of polynomials. Moreover, this method can be used to investigate families of differential equations, integral equations, recurrence relations, shift operators, and determinant forms. With the help of operational formalism, it is possible to obtain new insights into the properties and behavior of these mathematical constructs. These observations and investigations have the potential to lead to a deeper understanding of various mathematical concepts, as well as to the development of new mathematical tools and techniques. Therefore, operational formalism is a valuable tool for mathematicians and researchers who are interested in exploring and expanding the boundaries of mathematical knowledge.
The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence tools in the creation of this article.
This work is funded through large group Research Project under grant number RGP2/429/44 provided by the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, S. K. Ntouyas, A. Ouahab, Existence results for fractional order functional differential equations with infinite delay, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 1340–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.021
![]() |
[2] |
M. Feckan, J. Wang, Y. Zhou, Controllability of fractional functional evolution equations of Sobolev type via characteristic solution operators, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 156 (2013), 79–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-012-0174-7 doi: 10.1007/s10957-012-0174-7
![]() |
[3] |
C. Lizama, An operator theoretical approach to a class of fractional order differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.08.042 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.08.042
![]() |
[4] |
R. A. El-Nabulsi, Path integral formulation of fractionally perturbed Lagrangian oscillators on fractal, J. Stat. Phys., 172 (2018), 1617–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-018-2116-8 doi: 10.1007/s10955-018-2116-8
![]() |
[5] |
P. B. Dhivakaran, A. Vinodkumar, S. Vijay, S. Lakshmanan, J. Alzabut, R. A. El-Nabulsi, et al., Bipartite synchronization of fractional-order memristor-based coupled delayed neural networks with pinning control, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 3699. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10193699 doi: 10.3390/math10193699
![]() |
[6] |
E. Hernández, D. O'Regan, K. Balachandran, Existence results for abstract fractional differential equations with nonlocal conditions via resolvent operators, Indag. Math., 24 (2013), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indag.2012.06.007 doi: 10.1016/j.indag.2012.06.007
![]() |
[7] |
Y. Zhou, J. Wang, L. Zhang, Basic theory of fractional differential equations, 2 Eds., World Scientific, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1142/10238 doi: 10.1142/10238
![]() |
[8] |
G. M. Mophou, G. M. N'guérékata, On integral solutions of some nonlocal fractional differential equations with nondense domain, Nonlinear Anal., 71 (2009), 4668–4675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2009.03.029 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.03.029
![]() |
[9] |
N. Nagajothi, V. Sadhasivam, O. Bazighifan, R. A. El-Nabulsi, Existence of the class of nonlinear hybrid fractional Langevin quantum differential equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040156 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040156
![]() |
[10] |
R. A. El-Nabulsi, Fractional nonlocal Newton's law of motion and emergence of Bagley-Torvik equation, J. Peridyn. Nonlocal Model., 2 (2020), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-019-00018-6 doi: 10.1007/s42102-019-00018-6
![]() |
[11] |
W. Afzal, M. Abbas, W. Hamali, A. M. Mahnashi, M. D. Sen, Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities via Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral for h-Godunova-Levin and (h1,h2)-convex functions, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7090687 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7090687
![]() |
[12] |
W. Afzal, N. M. Aloraini, M. Abbas, J. S. Ro, A. A. Zaagan, Some novel Kulisch-Miranker type inclusions for a generalized class of Godunova-Levin stochastic processes, AIMS Mathematics, 9 (2024), 5122–5146. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024249 doi: 10.3934/math.2024249
![]() |
[13] |
A. A. H. Ahmadini, W. Afzal, M. Abbas, E. S. Aly, Weighted Fejer, Hermite-Hadamard, and Trapezium-type inequalities for (h1, h2)-Godunova-Levin Preinvex function with applications and two open problems, Mathematics, 12 (2024), 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12030382 doi: 10.3390/math12030382
![]() |
[14] |
Y. Xu, W. Li, C. Zhang, W. Li, Global bipartite synchronization of fractional-order time-varying coupled signed networks with proportional delays, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 126 (2023), 107452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107452 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107452
![]() |
[15] |
L. Zhang, Y. Yang, Bipartite synchronization analysis of fractional order coupled neural networks with hybrid control, Neural Process. Lett., 52 (2020), 1969–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-020-10332-6 doi: 10.1007/s11063-020-10332-6
![]() |
[16] |
Y. Guo, Y. Li, Bipartite leader-following synchronization of fractional-order delayed multilayer signed networks by adaptive and impulsive controllers, Appl. Math. Comput., 430 (2022), 127243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127243 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127243
![]() |
[17] |
Z. Yao, Z. Yang, Y. Fu, Long time decay analysis of complex-valued fractional abstract evolution equations with delay, Appl. Math. Comput., 460 (2024), 128292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2023.128292 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2023.128292
![]() |
[18] |
A. Jajarmi, D. Baleanu, S. S. Sajjadi, J. J. Nieto, Analysis and some applications of a regularized ψ-Hilfer fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 415 (2022), 114476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.114476 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114476
![]() |
[19] |
M. I. Liaqat, A. Akg¨ul, A novel approach for solving linear and nonlinear time-fractional Schrödinger equations, Chaos Soliton Fract., 162 (2022), 112487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112487 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112487
![]() |
[20] | W. Chen, H. Sun, X. Li, Fractional derivative modeling in mechanics and engineering, Singapore: Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8802-7 |
[21] |
M. I. Liaqat, A. Khan, A. Akg¨ul, Adaptation on power series method with conformable operator for solving fractional order systems of nonlinear partial differential equations, Chaos Soliton Fract., 157 (2022), 111984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111984 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111984
![]() |
[22] |
M. Mouy, H. Boulares, S. Alshammari, M. Alshammari, Y. Laskri, W. W. Mohammed, On averaging principle for Caputo-Hadamard fractional stochastic differential pantograph equation, Fractal Fract., 7 (2022), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7010031 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7010031
![]() |
[23] |
R. Khalil, M. Al Horani, A. Yousef, M. Sababheh, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 264 (2014), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002
![]() |
[24] |
H. M. Ahmed, Q. Zhu, The averaging principle of Hilfer fractional stochastic delay differential equations with Poisson jumps, Appl. Math. Lett., 112 (2021), 106755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106755 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106755
![]() |
[25] |
C. Dineshkumar, K. S. Nisar, R. Udhayakumar, V. Vijayakumar, A discussion on approximate controllability of Sobolev-type Hilfer neutral fractional stochastic differential inclusions, Asian J. Control, 24 (2022), 2378–2394. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2650 doi: 10.1002/asjc.2650
![]() |
[26] |
V. E. Tarasov, Mathematical economics: Application of fractional calculus, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050660 doi: 10.3390/math8050660
![]() |
[27] |
Z. Li, L. Xu, Exponential stability in mean square of stochastic functional differential equations with infinite delay, Acta Appl. Math., 174 (2021), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-021-00426-1 doi: 10.1007/s10440-021-00426-1
![]() |
[28] |
L. Kexue, P. Jigen, Controllability of fractional neutral stochastic functional differential systems, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 65 (2014), 941–959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00033-013-0369-2 doi: 10.1007/s00033-013-0369-2
![]() |
[29] |
J. Cui, L. Yan, Existence result for fractional neutral stochastic integro-differential equations with infinite delay, J. Phys. A, 44 (2011), 335201. http://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/33/335201 doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/33/335201
![]() |
[30] |
M. Niu, B. Xie, Regularity of a fractional partial differential equation driven by space-time white noise, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 138 (2010), 1479–1489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-09-10197-1 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-09-10197-1
![]() |
[31] |
P. Chen, Y. Li, X. Zhang, On the initial value problem of fractional stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert space, Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal., 14 (2015), 1817–1840. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.1817 doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.1817
![]() |
[32] |
P. Chen, Y. Li, Nonlocal Cauchy problem for fractional stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces, Collect. Math., 66 (2015), 63–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13348-014-0106 doi: 10.1007/s13348-014-0106
![]() |
[33] |
P. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Li, Nonlocal problem for fractional stochastic evolution equations with solution operators, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 19 (2016), 1507–1526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/fca-2016-0078 doi: 10.1515/fca-2016-0078
![]() |
[34] |
A. Karczewska, C. Lizama, Solutions to stochastic fractional oscillation equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 23 (2010), 1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.06.032 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.06.032
![]() |
[35] |
R. Schnaubelt, M. Veraar, Regularity of stochastic Volterra equations by functional calculus methods, J. Evol. Equ., 17 (2017), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-016-0365-z doi: 10.1007/s00028-016-0365-z
![]() |
[36] |
G. Xiao, J. Wang, Stability of solutions of Caputo fractional stochastic differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control, 26 (2021), 581–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/namc.2021.26.22421 doi: 10.15388/namc.2021.26.22421
![]() |
[37] |
S. Saifullah, S. Shahid, A. Zada, Analysis of neutral stochastic fractional differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative with retarded and advanced arguments, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 23 (2024), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-023-00894-w doi: 10.1007/s12346-023-00894-w
![]() |
[38] |
A. Moumen, A. Alsinai, R. Shafqat, N. A. Albasheir, M. Alhagyan, A. Gargouri, et al., Controllability of fractional stochastic evolution inclusion via Hilfer derivative of fixed point theory, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 19892–19912. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.20231014 doi: 10.3934/math.20231014
![]() |
[39] |
M. Houas, A. Devi, A. Kumar, Existence and stability results for fractional-order pantograph differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional operators, Int. J. Dynam. Control, 11 (2023), 1386–1395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01005-4 doi: 10.1007/s40435-022-01005-4
![]() |
[40] |
E. Gokmen, O. R. Isik, A numerical method to solve fractional pantograph differential equations with residual error analysis, Math. Sci., 16 (2022), 361–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40096-021-00426-0 doi: 10.1007/s40096-021-00426-0
![]() |
[41] |
P. Rahimkhani, Y. Ordokhani, E. Babolian, Numerical solution of fractional pantograph differential equations by using generalized fractional-order Bernoulli wavelet, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 309 (2017), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2016.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.06.005
![]() |
[42] | I. Ahmed, P. Kumam, J. Abubakar, P. Borisut, K. Sitthithakerngkiet, Solutions for impulsive fractional pantograph differential equation via generalized anti-periodic boundary condition, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 477. |
[43] |
C. Yang, J. Hou, X. Lv, Jacobi spectral collocation method for solving fractional pantograph delay differential equations, Eng. Comput., 38 (2022), 1985–1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01193-7 doi: 10.1007/s00366-020-01193-7
![]() |
[44] |
J. Alzabut, A. G. M. Selvam, R. A. El-Nabulsi, V. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. E. Samei, Asymptotic stability of nonlinear discrete fractional pantograph equations with non-local initial conditions, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 473. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13030473 doi: 10.3390/sym13030473
![]() |
[45] |
O. Kahouli, S. Albadran, A. Aloui, A. B. Makhlouf, Ulam-Hyers stability of pantograph Hadamard fractional stochastic differential equations, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081583 doi: 10.3390/sym15081583
![]() |
[46] |
M. Houas, A. Devi, A. Kumar, Existence and stability results for fractional-order pantograph differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional operators, Int. J. Dynam. Control, 11 (2023), 1386–1395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01005-4 doi: 10.1007/s40435-022-01005-4
![]() |
[47] |
M. A. Alqudah, H. Boulares, B. Abdalla, T. Abdeljawad, Khasminskii approach for ψ-Caputo fractional stochastic pantograph problem, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 23 (2024), 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-023-00951-4 doi: 10.1007/s12346-023-00951-4
![]() |
[48] |
A. S. Ranjani, M. Suvinthra, Large deviations for stochastic fractional pantograph differential equation, Int. J. Dynam. Control, 12 (2023), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01339-7 doi: 10.1007/s40435-023-01339-7
![]() |
[49] |
D. Gao, J. Li, Z. Luo, D. Luo, The averaging principle for stochastic pantograph equations with non-Lipschitz conditions, Math. Probl. Eng., 2021 (2021), 5578936. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5578936 doi: 10.1155/2021/5578936
![]() |
[50] |
L. Hu, Y. Ren, Q. He, Pantograph stochastic differential equations driven by G-Brownian motion, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 480 (2019), 123381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123381 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123381
![]() |
[51] |
L. Mchiri, A. B. Makhlouf, H. Rguigui, Ulam-Hyers stability of pantograph fractional stochastic differential equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 4134–4144. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8745 doi: 10.1002/mma.8745
![]() |
[52] |
W. Xu, W. Xu, S. Zhang, The averaging principle for stochastic differential equations with Caputo fractional derivative, Appl. Math. Lett., 93 (2019), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.02.005 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.02.005
![]() |
[53] |
W. Wang, S. Cheng, Z. Guo, X. Yan, A note on the continuity for Caputo fractional stochastic differential equations, Chaos, 30 (2022), 073106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5141485 doi: 10.1063/1.5141485
![]() |
[54] |
D. Luo, Q. Zhu, Z. Luo, An averaging principle for stochastic fractional differential equations with time-delays, Appl. Math. Lett., 105 (2020), 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106290 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106290
![]() |
[55] |
Z. Wang, P. Lin, Averaging principle for fractional stochastic differential equations with Lp convergence, Appl. Math. Lett., 130 (2022), 108024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108024 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108024
![]() |
[56] |
D. Zhao, M. Luo, General conformable fractional derivative and its physical interpretation, Calcolo, 54 (2017), 903–917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10092-017-0213-8 doi: 10.1007/s10092-017-0213-8
![]() |
[57] |
A. Ali, Z. Gul, W. A. Khan, S. Ahmad, S. Zeb, Investigation of fractional order sine-Gordon equation using Laplace Adomian decomposition method, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2150121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21501218 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21501218
![]() |
[58] |
G. Sowmya, I. E. Sarris, C. S. Vishalakshi, R. S. V. Kumar, B. C. Prasannakumara, Analysis of transient thermal distribution in a convective-radiative moving rod using two-dimensional differential transform method with multivariate pade approximant, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1793. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13101793 doi: 10.3390/sym13101793
![]() |
[59] |
E. Rama, K. Somaiah, K. Sambaiah, A study of variational iteration method for solving various types of problems, Malaya J. Mat., 9 (2021), 701–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.26637/MJM0901/0123 doi: 10.26637/MJM0901/0123
![]() |
[60] |
S. Yüzbasi, An operational matrix method to solve the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey models with discrete delays, Chaos Soliton Fract., 153 (2021), 111482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111482 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111482
![]() |
[61] |
P. Jain, M. Kumbhakar, K. Ghoshal, Application of homotopy analysis method to the determination of vertical sediment concentration distribution with shear-induced diffusivity, Eng. Comput., 38 (2022), 2609–2628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01491-8 doi: 10.1007/s00366-021-01491-8
![]() |
[62] |
S. N. Tural-Polat, A. T. Dincel, Numerical solution method for multi-term variable order fractional differential equations by shifted Chebyshev polynomials of the third kind, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 5145–5153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.036 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.036
![]() |
[63] |
H. Eltayeb, S. Mesloub, Application of multi-dimensional of conformable Sumudu decomposition method for solving conformable singular fractional coupled Burger's equation, Acta Math. Sci., 41 (2021), 1679–1698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10473-021-0517-2 doi: 10.1007/s10473-021-0517-2
![]() |
[64] |
M. H. Al-Tai, A. Al-Fayadh, Solving two dimensional coupled Burger's equations and Sine-Gordon equation using El-Zaki transform-variational iteration method, Al-Nahrain J. Sci., 24 (2021), 41–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.22401/ANJS.24.2.07 doi: 10.22401/ANJS.24.2.07
![]() |
[65] |
M. Modanli, S. T. Abdulazeez, A. M. Husien, A residual power series method for solving pseudo hyperbolic partial differential equations with nonlocal conditions, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ., 37 (2021), 2235–2243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/num.22683 doi: 10.1002/num.22683
![]() |
[66] |
M. I. Liaqat, A. Khan, M. A. Alqudah, T. Abdeljawad, Adapted Homotopy perturbation method with Shehu transform for solving conformable fractional nonlinear partial differential equations, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2340027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23400273 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23400273
![]() |
[67] |
M. I. Liaqat, E. Okyere, The fractional series solutions for the conformable time-fractional swift-Hohenberg equation through the conformable Shehu Daftardar-Jafari approach with comparative analysis, J. Math., 2022 (2022), 3295076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3295076 doi: 10.1155/2022/3295076
![]() |
[68] |
M. I. Liaqat, A. Akgül, M. De la Sen, M. Bayram, Approximate and exact solutions in the sense of conformable derivatives of quantum mechanics models using a novel algorithm, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 744. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15030744 doi: 10.3390/sym15030744
![]() |