This study examines an epidemiological model known as the susceptible-exposed-infected-hospitalized-recovered (SEIHR) model, with and without impulsive vaccination strategies. First, the model was analyzed without impulsive vaccination in the presence of a reinfection effect. Subsequently, it was studied as part of a periodic impulsive vaccination strategy targeting the susceptible population. These vaccination impulses were administered in very brief intervals at specific time instants, with a fixed time gap between each impulse. The two approaches can be modified to respond to different amounts of susceptibility, with control efforts intensifying as susceptibility levels rise. The model's analysis includes crucial aspects such as the non-negativity of solutions, the existence of steady states, and the stability corresponding to the basic reproduction number. We demonstrate that when vaccination measures are taken into account, the basic reproduction number remains as less than one. Therefore, the disease-free equilibrium in the case of vaccination could still be asymptotically stable at the higher disease transmission rate, as compared to the case of no vaccination in which the disease-free equilibrium may no longer be asymptotically stable. Furthermore, we show that when the disease-free equilibrium is stable, the endemic equilibrium cannot be attained, and that when the reproduction number rises above unity, the disease-free equilibrium becomes unstable while the endemic equilibrium becomes stable. We have also derived conditions for the global stability of both equilibriums. To support our theoretical results, we have constructed a time series of numerical simulations and compared them with real-world data from the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Citation: Chontita Rattanakul, Inthira Chaiya. A mathematical model for predicting and controlling COVID-19 transmission with impulsive vaccination[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6281-6304. doi: 10.3934/math.2024306
This study examines an epidemiological model known as the susceptible-exposed-infected-hospitalized-recovered (SEIHR) model, with and without impulsive vaccination strategies. First, the model was analyzed without impulsive vaccination in the presence of a reinfection effect. Subsequently, it was studied as part of a periodic impulsive vaccination strategy targeting the susceptible population. These vaccination impulses were administered in very brief intervals at specific time instants, with a fixed time gap between each impulse. The two approaches can be modified to respond to different amounts of susceptibility, with control efforts intensifying as susceptibility levels rise. The model's analysis includes crucial aspects such as the non-negativity of solutions, the existence of steady states, and the stability corresponding to the basic reproduction number. We demonstrate that when vaccination measures are taken into account, the basic reproduction number remains as less than one. Therefore, the disease-free equilibrium in the case of vaccination could still be asymptotically stable at the higher disease transmission rate, as compared to the case of no vaccination in which the disease-free equilibrium may no longer be asymptotically stable. Furthermore, we show that when the disease-free equilibrium is stable, the endemic equilibrium cannot be attained, and that when the reproduction number rises above unity, the disease-free equilibrium becomes unstable while the endemic equilibrium becomes stable. We have also derived conditions for the global stability of both equilibriums. To support our theoretical results, we have constructed a time series of numerical simulations and compared them with real-world data from the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.
[1] | Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19): Situation report-126, 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/situation-report---126. |
[2] | Nebraska Medicine, Covid-19: Disease-induced (natural) immunity, vaccination or hybrid immunity? 2023. Available from: https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/covid-19-studies-natural-immunity-versus\-vaccination. |
[3] | WHO COVID-19 dashboard data, 2020. Available from: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/data?n = c. |
[4] | I. Alazman, K. S. Albalawi, P. Goswami, K. Malik, A restricted sir model with vaccination effect for the epidemic outbreaks concerning covid-19, CMES-Comp. Model. Eng., 137 (2023), 3. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.028674 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2023.028674 |
[5] | C. Anastassopoulou, L. Russo, A. Tsakris, C. Siettos, Data-based analysis, modelling and forecasting of the covid-19 outbreak, PloS one, 15 (2020), e0230405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230405 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230405 |
[6] | R. M. Anderson, R. M. May, Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control, Oxford university press, 1991. |
[7] | G. Ballinger, X. Liu, Permanence of population growth models with impulsive effects, Math. Comput. Model., 26 (1997), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(97)00240-9 doi: 10.1016/S0895-7177(97)00240-9 |
[8] | F. Brauer, C. Castillo-Chavez, C. Castillo-Chavez, Mathematical models in population biology and epidemiology, New York: Springer, 2012. |
[9] | F. Casella, Can the covid-19 epidemic be controlled on the basis of daily test reports? IEEE Control Syst. Lett., 5 (2021), 1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCSYS.2020.3009912 |
[10] | C. Chiyaka, W. Garira, S. Dube, Transmission model of endemic human malaria in a partially immune population, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007), 806–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.12.010 |
[11] | C. A. Ciro, S. A. James, H. McGuire, V. Lepak, S. Dresser, A. Costner-Lark, et al., Natural, longitudinal recovery of adults with covid-19 using standardized rehabilitation measures, Front. Aging Neurosci., 14 (2022), 958744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.958744 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.958744 |
[12] | M. F. Danca, N. Kuznetsov, Matlab code for lyapunov exponents of fractional-order systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 28 (2018), 1850067. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127418500670 doi: 10.1142/S0218127418500670 |
[13] | W. R. Derrick, S. I. Grossman, Elementary differential equations with applications, Addision Wesley Publishing Company, 1976. |
[14] | O. Diekmann, J. A. P. Heesterbeek, Mathematical epidemiology of infectious diseases: Model building, analysis and interpretation, John Wiley & Sons, 2000. |
[15] | M. Etxeberria-Etxaniz, S. Alonso-Quesada, M. De la Sen, On an seir epidemic model with vaccination of newborns and periodic impulsive vaccination with eventual on-line adapted vaccination strategies to the varying levels of the susceptible subpopulation, Appl. Sci., 10 (2020), 8296. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228296 doi: 10.3390/app10228296 |
[16] | H. Gaff, E. Schaefer, Optimal control applied to vaccination and treatment strategies for various epidemiological models, Math. Biosci. Eng., 6 (2009), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2009.6.469 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.469 |
[17] | W. O. Kermack, A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 115 (1927), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118 |
[18] | K. Kuga, J. Tanimoto, Which is more effective for suppressing an infectious disease: Imperfect vaccination or defense against contagion? J. Stat. Mech., 2018 (2018), 023407. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aaac3c |
[19] | J. P. La Salle, The stability of dynamical systems, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1976. |
[20] | V. Lakshmikantham, P. S. Simeonov, Theory of impulsive differential equations, World scientific, 1989. |
[21] | Q. Lin, S. Zhao, D. Gao, Y. Lou, S. Yang, S. S. Musa, et al., A conceptual model for the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) outbreak in wuhan, china with individual reaction and governmental action, Int. J. Infect. Dis., 93 (2020), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.058 doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.058 |
[22] | H. Park, S. H. Kim, A study on herd immunity of covid-19 in south korea: Using a stochastic economic-epidemiological model, Environ. Resource Econ., 76 (2020), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00439-8 doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00439-8 |
[23] | S. Sanche, Y. T. Lin, C. Xu, E. Romero-Severson, N. Hengartner, R. Ke, High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Emerg. Infect. Dis., 26 (2020), 1470. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2607.200282 doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200282 |
[24] | A. K. Singh, M. Mehra, S. Gulyani, A modified variable-order fractional sir model to predict the spread of covid-19 in india, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7655 |
[25] | N. Sweilam, S. Al-Mekhlafi, D. Baleanu, Optimal control for a fractional tuberculosis infection model including the impact of diabetes and resistant strains, J. Adv. Res., 17 (2019), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.007 |
[26] | N. Sweilam, S. AL-Mekhlafi, Optimal control for a nonlinear mathematical model of tumor under immune suppression: A numerical approach, Optim. Contr. Appl. Met., 39 (2018), 1581–1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2427 doi: 10.1002/oca.2427 |
[27] | N. Sweilam, O. Saad, D. Mohamed, Fractional optimal control in transmission dynamics of west nile virus model with state and control time delay: A numerical approach, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2019 (2019), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2147-8 doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2147-8 |
[28] | N. Sweilam, O. Saad, D. Mohamed, Numerical treatments of the tranmission dynamics of west nile virus and it's optimal control, Electon. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 7 (2019), 9–38. |
[29] | J. Tanimoto, Sociophysics approach to epidemics, Singapore: Springer, 2021. |
[30] | P. van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 |
[31] | T. P. Velavan, C. G. Meyer, The covid-19 epidemic, Trop. Med. Int. Health, 25 (2020), 278–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13383 |
[32] | J. T. Wu, K. Leung, M. Bushman, N. Kishore, R. Niehus, P. M. de Salazar, et al., Estimating clinical severity of covid-19 from the transmission dynamics in wuhan, china, Nat. Med., 26 (2020), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0822-7 doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0822-7 |
[33] | B. Yang, Z. Yu, Y. Cai, The impact of vaccination on the spread of covid-19: Studying by a mathematical model, Physica A, 590 (2022), 126717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126717 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126717 |