Research article

Identification of the enterprise financialization motivation on crowding out R&D innovation: evidence from listed companies in China

  • Received: 14 January 2024 Revised: 25 January 2024 Accepted: 26 January 2024 Published: 01 February 2024
  • MSC : 91B80

  • Enterprise financial asset allocation depends on its motivation, which significantly influences its R&D innovation. In this study, we theoretically analyzed the motivation behind the crowding-out effect of enterprise financialization on R&D innovation and constructed a panel data model to identify enterprise financialization behavior. Furthermore, we analyzed the characteristics of enterprises with two types of effects on R&D innovation: Crowding-out and non-crowding-out. Using disclosed data from listed companies in China as the sample, the following conclusions were drawn. First, there are two types of motivation for enterprise financial assets: reservoir motivation and substitute motivation. This difference in motivation leads to whether there is a crowding-out effect of enterprise financialization on R&D innovation. Second, based on whether there is a crowding-out effect on enterprise R&D innovation, we found that the difference in reservoir motivation between the two types of samples is reflected in the intensity of inhibition, while the difference in substitute motivation is reflected in significance. Third, there are differences in the mechanism variables of financialization motivation among different samples. The moderating effect of equity concentration is reflected in its intensity, while the moderating effect of financing constraints is reflected in its significance.

    Citation: Yue Liu, Yixian Wen, Yulan Xiao, Lichang Zhang, Shan Huang. Identification of the enterprise financialization motivation on crowding out R&D innovation: evidence from listed companies in China[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5951-5970. doi: 10.3934/math.2024291

    Related Papers:

  • Enterprise financial asset allocation depends on its motivation, which significantly influences its R&D innovation. In this study, we theoretically analyzed the motivation behind the crowding-out effect of enterprise financialization on R&D innovation and constructed a panel data model to identify enterprise financialization behavior. Furthermore, we analyzed the characteristics of enterprises with two types of effects on R&D innovation: Crowding-out and non-crowding-out. Using disclosed data from listed companies in China as the sample, the following conclusions were drawn. First, there are two types of motivation for enterprise financial assets: reservoir motivation and substitute motivation. This difference in motivation leads to whether there is a crowding-out effect of enterprise financialization on R&D innovation. Second, based on whether there is a crowding-out effect on enterprise R&D innovation, we found that the difference in reservoir motivation between the two types of samples is reflected in the intensity of inhibition, while the difference in substitute motivation is reflected in significance. Third, there are differences in the mechanism variables of financialization motivation among different samples. The moderating effect of equity concentration is reflected in its intensity, while the moderating effect of financing constraints is reflected in its significance.



    加载中


    [1] L. A. Hall, S. Bagchi-Sen, A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry, Technovation, 22 (2002), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00016-5 doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00016-5
    [2] G. J. Prah, Innovation and economic performance: the role of financial development, Quant. Financ. Econ., 6 (2022), 696–721. https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2022031 doi: 10.3934/qfe.2022031
    [3] Y. F. Wang, J. Liu, X. R. Yang, M. Shi, R. Ran, The mechanism of green finance's impact on enterprise' sustainable green innovation, Green Financ., 5 (2023), 452–478. https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2023018 doi: 10.3934/gf.2023018
    [4] K. J. Klassen, J. A. Pittman, M. P. Reed, S. Fortin, A cross-national comparison of R&D expenditure decisions: tax incentives and financial constraints, Contemp. Account. Res., 21 (2004), 639–680. https://doi.org/10.1506/cf2e-huvc-gafy-5h56 doi: 10.1506/cf2e-huvc-gafy-5h56
    [5] K. Guo, X. M. Guo, J. Zhang, Financial asset allocation duality and enterprise upgrading: empirical evidence from the Chinese A-share market, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 10 (2023), 237. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01683-1 doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01683-1
    [6] S. Orazi, L. B. Martinez, H. P. Vigier, Determinants and evolution of financial inclusion in Latin America: a demand side analysis, Quant. Financ. Econ., 7 (2023), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2023010 doi: 10.3934/qfe.2023010
    [7] Z. H. Li, B. Mo, H. Nie, Time and frequency dynamic connectedness between cryptocurrencies and financial assets in China, Int. Rev. Econo. Finance, 86 (2023), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.01.015 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.01.015
    [8] Y. Liu, Z. H. Li, M. R. Xu, The influential factors of financial cycle spillover: evidence from China, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Tr., 56 (2020), 1336–1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2019.1658076 doi: 10.1080/1540496x.2019.1658076
    [9] Z. H. Li, J. H. Zhong, Impact of economic policy uncertainty shocks on China's financial conditions, Financ. Res. Lett., 35 (2020), 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101303 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.101303
    [10] I. Yarba, A. D. Yassa, Does stock market listing boost or impede corporate investment, Borsa Istanb. Rev., 22 (2022), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.001
    [11] Y. Q. Gao, Z. S. Wang, K. H. Wang, R. A. I. Zhang, Y. C. Lu, Effect of big data on enterprise financialization: evidence from China's SMEs, Technol. Soc., 75 (2023), 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102351 doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102351
    [12] Y. H. Huang, L. Sun, T. B. Ger, An analysis of enterprise resource planning systems and key determinants using the Delphi method and an analytic hierarchy process, Data Sci. Financ. Econ., 3 (2023), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3934/dsfe.2023010 doi: 10.3934/dsfe.2023010
    [13] J. H. Ma, Z. H. Li, Measuring China's urban digital economy, Natl. Account. Rev., 4 (2022), 329–361. https://doi.org/10.3934/nar.2022019 doi: 10.3934/nar.2022019
    [14] Z. Li, H. Chen, B. Mo, Can digital finance promote urban innovation? Evidence from China, Borsa Istanb. Rev., 23 (2023), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.006
    [15] Z. Li, G. Liao, K. Albitar, Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation, Bus. Strategy Environ., 29 (2019), 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416 doi: 10.1002/bse.2416
    [16] J. R. Brown, B. C. Petersen, Cash holdings and R&D smoothing, J. Corp. Financ., 17 (2011), 694–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.01.003
    [17] D. Liu, Z. Y. Li, H. B. He, W. X. Hou, The determinants of R&D smoothing with asset sales: Evidence from R&D-intensive firms in China, Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., 75 (2021), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.013 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.013
    [18] J. Duan, T. T. Liu, X. R. Yang, H. Yang, Y. W. Gao, Financial asset allocation and green innovation, Green Financ., 5 (2023), 512–537. https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2023020 doi: 10.3934/gf.2023020
    [19] M. Shugurov, International cooperation on climate research and green technologies in the face of sanctions: the case of Russia, Green Financ., 5 (2023), 102–153. https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2023006 doi: 10.3934/gf.2023006
    [20] L. Liu, M. Liu, How does the digital economy affect industrial eco-efficiency? Empirical evidence from China, Data Sci. Financ. Econ., 2 (2022), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.3934/dsfe.2022019 doi: 10.3934/dsfe.2022019
    [21] K. F. Xu, Y. Liu, Z. Y. Liu, Dynamic game model for R&D strategy in high-tech enterprises, J. Differ. Equ. Appl., 29 (2023), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2023.2182152 doi: 10.1080/10236198.2023.2182152
    [22] Z. H. Li, J. H. Zhu, J. J. He, The effects of digital financial inclusion on innovation and entrepreneurship: A network perspective, Electron. Res. Arch., 30 (2022), 4697–4715. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2022238 doi: 10.3934/era.2022238
    [23] M. Hong, J. J. He, K. X. Zhang, Z. D. Guo, Does digital transformation of enterprises help reduce the cost of equity capital, Math. Biosci. Eng., 20 (2023), 6498–6516. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023280 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023280
    [24] Z. H. Li, Z. M. Huang, Y. Y. Su, New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: evidence from China, Energy Econ., 119 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545
    [25] D. Sheng, O. Guyot, Corporate governance in Chinese manufacturing sector: ownership structure, monitoring and firms' earning quality, Natl. Account. Rev., 5 (2023), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.3934/nar.2023024 doi: 10.3934/nar.2023024
    [26] Y. Wen, Y. Xu, Statistical monitoring of economic growth momentum transformation: empirical study of Chinese provinces, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 24825–24847. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231266 doi: 10.3934/math.20231266
    [27] Ö. Orhangazi, Financialisation and capital accumulation in the non-financial corporate sector: A theoretical and empirical investigation on the US economy: 1973–2003, Camb. J. Econ., 32 (2008), 863–886. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben009 doi: 10.1093/cje/ben009
    [28] W. Lazonick, D. J. Teece, Introduction: management innovation–Essays in the spirit of Alfred D. Chandler, Jr, Ind. Corp. Change, 19 (2010), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq014 doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq014
    [29] Z. J. Xie, J. Du, Y. C. Wu, Does financialization of non-financial corporations promote the persistence of innovation: evidence from A-share listed manufacturing corporations in China, Eur. Bus. Rev., 12 (2022), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-021-00193-x doi: 10.1007/s40821-021-00193-x
    [30] Z. Li, C. Yang, Z. Huang, How does the fintech sector react to signals from central bank digital currencies, Financ. Res. Lett., 50 (2022), 103308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103308 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103308
    [31] Z. H. Li, H. Dong, C. Floros, A. Charemis, P. Failler, Re-examining Bitcoin volatility: a CAViaR-based Approach, Emerg. Markets Financ. Trade, 58 (2022), 1320–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2021.1873127 doi: 10.1080/1540496x.2021.1873127
    [32] Z. Li, L. Chen, H. Dong, What are bitcoin market reactions to its-related events, Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., 73 (2021), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.12.020 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.12.020
    [33] H. J. Kim, P. Sohn, J. Y. Seo, The capital structure adjustment through debt financing based on various macroeconomic conditions in Korean market, Invest. Econ., 74 (2015), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inveco.2015.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.inveco.2015.11.005
    [34] S. Y. Huang, X. Liu, D. Lou, C. Polk, The booms and busts of beta arbitrage, Manage. Sci., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4929 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4929
    [35] Z. Q. Zhang, Z. Su, F. Tong, Does digital transformation restrain corporate financialization? Evidence from China, Financ. Res. Lett., 56 (2023), 104152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104152 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104152
    [36] W. Li, L. H. Chen, S. He, The effect of enterprise financialization on green innovation: evidence from Chinese A-share non-financial listed enterprises, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023), 56802–56817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26377-8 doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26377-8
    [37] C. H. Xu, H. K. Zhang, M. S. Wang, A. Iqbal, Investigating the relationship between entity financialization, managers' incentives, and enterprise's innovation: fresh evidence from China, Front. Psychol., 12 (2022), 810294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.810294 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.810294
    [38] S. Kim, H. Lee, J. Kim, Divergent effects of external financing on technology innovation activity: Korean evidence, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 106 (2016), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.002
    [39] H. Y. Gao, H. Y. Wen, X. J. Wang, Pandemic effect on corporate financial asset holdings: precautionary or return-chasing, Res. Int. Bus. Financ., 62 (2022), 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101750 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101750
    [40] H. Tan, X. H. Zhang, L. L. Zeng, Operating leverage, equity incentive, and enterprise research and development investment, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 7023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097023 doi: 10.3390/su15097023
    [41] Y. Liu, L. M. Chen, H. Luo, Y. Z. Liu, Y. X. Wen, The impact of intellectual property rights protection on green innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the pilot policy of the Chinese intellectual property court, Math. Biosci. Eng., 21 (2024), 2587–2607. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024114 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024114
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(951) PDF downloads(69) Cited by(6)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog