Dandelion optimization based feature selection with machine learning for digital transaction fraud detection

Ebtesam Al-Mansor; Mohammed Al-Jabbar; Arwa Darwish Alzughaibi; Salem Alkhalaf; Ebtesam Al-Mansor; Mohammed Al-Jabbar; Arwa Darwish Alzughaibi; Salem Alkhalaf

doi:10.3934/math.2024209

AIMS Mathematics

2024, Volume 9, Issue 2: 4241-4258. doi: 10.3934/math.2024209

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Dandelion optimization based feature selection with machine learning for digital transaction fraud detection

1.
Computer Sciences Department, Applied College, Najran University, Najran 66462, Saudi Arabia
2.
Applied college, Taibah University, AL Madinah AL Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia
3.
Department of Computer, College of Science and Arts in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia

Received: 15 November 2023 Revised: 30 December 2023 Accepted: 03 January 2024 Published: 16 January 2024
MSC : 49-04, 92B20

Digital transactions relying on credit cards are gradually improving in recent days due to their convenience. Due to the tremendous growth of e-services (e.g., mobile payments, e-commerce, and e-finance) and the promotion of credit cards, fraudulent transaction counts are rapidly increasing. Machine learning (ML) is crucial in investigating customer data for detecting and preventing fraud. Conversely, the advent of irrelevant and redundant features in most real-time credit card details reduces the execution of ML techniques. The feature selection (FS) approach's purpose is to detect the most prominent attributes required for developing an effective ML approach, making sure that the classification and computational complexity are improved and decreased, respectively. Therefore, this study presents an evolutionary computing with fuzzy autoencoder based data analytics for credit card fraud detection (ECFAE-CCFD) technique. The purpose of the ECFAE-CCFD technique is to recognize the presence of credit card fraud (CCF) in real time. To achieve this, the ECFAE-CCFD technique performs data normalization in the earlier stage. For selecting features, the ECFAE-CCFD technique applies the dandelion optimization-based feature selection (DO-FS) technique. Moreover, the fuzzy autoencoder (FAE) approach can be exploited for the recognition and classification of CCF. FAE is a category of artificial neural network (ANN) designed for unsupervised learning that leverages fuzzy logic (FL) principles to enhance the representation and reconstruction of input data. An improved billiard optimization algorithm (IBOA) could be implemented for the optimum selection of the parameters based on the FAE algorithm to improve the classification performance. The simulation outcomes of the ECFAE-CCFD algorithm are examined on the benchmark open-access database. The values display the excellent performance of the ECFAE-CCFD method with respect to various measures.

Keywords:

Citation: Ebtesam Al-Mansor, Mohammed Al-Jabbar, Arwa Darwish Alzughaibi, Salem Alkhalaf. Dandelion optimization based feature selection with machine learning for digital transaction fraud detection[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4241-4258. doi: 10.3934/math.2024209

Related Papers:

[1]	Usman Babar, Haidar Ali, Shahid Hussain Arshad, Umber Sheikh . Multiplicative topological properties of graphs derived from honeycomb structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1562-1587. doi: 10.3934/math.2020107
[2]	Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Azeem Haider, Moin A. Ansari . Computation of eccentric topological indices of zero-divisor graphs based on their edges. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11509-11518. doi: 10.3934/math.2022641
[3]	R. Abu-Gdairi, A. A. El-Atik, M. K. El-Bably . Topological visualization and graph analysis of rough sets via neighborhoods: A medical application using human heart data. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26945-26967. doi: 10.3934/math.20231379
[4]	Sadik Delen, Ismail Naci Cangul . Effect of edge and vertex addition on Albertson and Bell indices. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 925-937. doi: 10.3934/math.2021055
[5]	Sumiya Nasir, Nadeem ul Hassan Awan, Fozia Bashir Farooq, Saima Parveen . Topological indices of novel drugs used in blood cancer treatment and its QSPR modeling. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11829-11850. doi: 10.3934/math.2022660
[6]	Wei Gao, Zahid Iqbal, Shehnaz Akhter, Muhammad Ishaq, Adnan Aslam . On irregularity descriptors of derived graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4085-4107. doi: 10.3934/math.2020262
[7]	Chenxu Yang, Meng Ji, Kinkar Chandra Das, Yaping Mao . Extreme graphs on the Sombor indices. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19126-19146. doi: 10.3934/math.20221050
[8]	Edil D. Molina, José M. Rodríguez-García, José M. Sigarreta, Sergio J. Torralbas Fitz . On the Gutman-Milovanović index and chemical applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 1998-2020. doi: 10.3934/math.2025094
[9]	Fawaz E. Alsaadi, Faisal Ali, Imran Khalid, Masood Ur Rehman, Muhammad Salman, Madini Obad Alassafi, Jinde Cao . Quantifying some distance topological properties of the non-zero component graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3512-3524. doi: 10.3934/math.2021209
[10]	Zhenhua Su, Zikai Tang . Extremal unicyclic and bicyclic graphs of the Euler Sombor index. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6338-6354. doi: 10.3934/math.2025289

Abstract

1. Introduction

Since molecules and molecular compounds are used to generate molecular graphs. Any graph that simulates some molecular structure can use a topological index as a mathematical formula ^[1]. Topological indices play a significant role in chemistry, pharmacology, etc., ^[2]. A molecular graph, whose vertices and edges are represented by atoms and chemical bonds, respectively, illustrates the constructional outcome of a chemical compound in graph theory form. Cheminformatics, a field shared by information science, chemistry and mathematics, has recently gained notoriety. This new topic discusses the connection between QSAR and QSPR, which is used to investigate (with a given level of accuracy) the theoretical and biological activities of specific chemical compounds ^[3]. For quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) and quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs), in which the physicochemical characteristics of molecules are correlated with their chemical structure, a topological index (TI) is a real number associated with chemical structures via their hydrogen-depleted graph ^[4,5,6].

Chemical graph theory is a newly developed area of mathematical chemistry that combines graph theory with chemistry. The main objective of chemical graph theory is to acknowledge the structural effects of a molecular graph ^[7]. The molecules and molecular compounds aid in the construction of a molecular graph. Topological descriptors, which are typically graph invariants, are numerical characteristics of a graph that describe its topology ^[8]. The certain physiochemical characteristics of some chemical compounds, such as their boiling point, strain energy, and stability are correlated by degree-based topological indices ^[9].

Chemical graph theory has many applications in many areas of life, including computer science, materials science, drug design, chemistry, biological networks, and electrical networks. For this reason, academics are currently very interested in this theory ^[10,11]. The numerical values attached to a simple, finite graph that represent its structure are called topological indices ^[12]. The multiplicative Zagreb indices for mathematical features, connection indices and applications see in ^{[13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]}. In this study, a novel method for computing the topological indices of two different chemical networks is presented. The mathematical properties of molecular structure descriptors, particularly those that depend on graph degrees, have been examined in our research. We derive neighborhood multiplicative topological indices and concise mathematical analysis for product of graphs ( $\mathcal{L}$ ) and tetrahedral diamond lattices ( $\Omega$ ). The fifth multiplicative Zagreb index, the general fifth-multiplicative Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative hyper-Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative product connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative sum connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index, the fifth-multiplicative harmonic index, and the fifth-multiplicative redefined Zagreb index are the topological indices that are taken into consideration. In this paper, we consider $G = \left(V, E\right)$ to be a simple, connected and finite graph contains vertices (atoms) atoms and edges (chemical bonds linking these atoms), for notation referee to ^[21].

2. The neighborhood degree-based multiplicative topological indices

In 2017, the new neighborhood degree-based multiplicative topological indices were introduced by V. R. Kulli in ^[22]. Let $§_{1\ }$ and $§_{2\ }$ denote the fifth neighborhood multiplicative M-Zagreb index defined as:

$\begin{equation} \S_1\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}\left(L\left(U_1\right)+L\left(U_2\right)\right)\,\,\, {\rm{and}} \,\,\,\, \S_2\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}L\left(U_1\right)L\left(U_2\right). \end{equation}$

(2.1)

Let $§_{3}$ and $§_{5\ }$ denote the general fifth multiplicative Zagreb index that are defined as:

$\begin{equation} \S_3\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}[L\left(U_1\right)+L\left(U_2\right)]^{\alpha}\,\,\, {\rm{and}} \,\,\,\, \S_5\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}[L\left(U_1\right)L\left(U_2\right)]^{\alpha}, \end{equation}$

(2.2)

where $\alpha$ is a real number.

The fifth multiplicative hyper-Zagreb index is denoted by $§_{4\ }$ and $§_{6}$ defined as:

$\begin{equation} \S_4\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}[L\left(U_1\right)+L\left(U_2\right)]^2\,\,\, {\rm{and}} \,\,\,\,\S_6\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}[L\left(U_1\right)L\left(U_2\right)]^2. \end{equation}$

(2.3)

The fifth multiplicative product connectivity index $§_{8\ }$ is defined as:

$\begin{equation} \S_8\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}\frac{1}{\sqrt{L\left(U_1\right)L\left(U_2\right)}}. \end{equation}$

(2.4)

The fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index of a graph G is defined as:

$\begin{equation} \S_9\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}\frac{1}{\sqrt{L\left(U_1\right)+L\left(U_2\right)}} \end{equation}$

(2.5)

The fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index $§_{10\ }$ of a graph G and it is defined as:

$\begin{equation} \S_{10}\left(G\right) = \prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}\frac{2\sqrt{L(U_1)L(U_2)}}{\sqrt{L(U_1)+L(U_2)}}. \end{equation}$

(2.6)

Inspired by Kulli, Sarkar et al. ^[23] introduced the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind § ${}_{7}$ , the fifth multiplicative harmonic index $§_{11}$ and the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index $§_{12}$ , respectively defined as:

$\begin{align} \S_7\left(G\right) = &\prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}\sqrt{L\left(U_1\right)L\left(U_2\right)}, \end{align}$

(2.7)

$\begin{align} \S_{11}\left(G\right) = &\prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}\frac{2}{\sqrt{L(U_1)+L(U_2)}}, \end{align}$

(2.8)

$\begin{align} {\S }_{12}\left(G\right) = &\prod\limits_{U_1U_2\in E\left(G\right)}{}L\left(U_1\right)L\left(U_2\right)[(L\left(U_1\right)+L\left(U_2\right]. \end{align}$

(2.9)

3. The neighborhood degree-based multiplicative indices for tensor product ${\mathcal{L}} ={{L}}_{p}{\otimes }{{L}}_{q}$

For any two graphs ${\mathrm{L\ and\ M}}$ , the tensor product of the graphs ${\mathrm{L\ and\ M}}$ is interpreted as $L\otimes M.$ This product is also known as categorical product of graphs defined in ^[24,25]. The vertex set of $L\otimes M\$ is denoted by $\ V\ \left(L\right)\times V\ \left(M\right)$ . For any integers p and q, the tensor product $L_p$ and $L_q$ is described by ${\ L}_p\otimes L_q$ . This graph contains a.b number of vertices with vertex set

$\{\left.\left(t_{1,}t_2\right):1\le t_1\le q,\ 1\le t_2\le p\right.\},$

and edge between $\left(t_1, {\mathrm{\ }}{{\mathrm{t}}}_2\right)$ and $\left(t_3, {\mathrm{\ }}{{\mathrm{t}}}_4\right)$ exists if and only if:

$\left|t_1-{{\mathrm{t}}}_3\right|-\left|t_2-{{\mathrm{t}}}_4\right| = 1.$

The graph $L_p\otimes L_q$ is known as a $\mathcal{L}$ with vertex cardinality $pq$ . The metric dimension of the categorial product of graphs is determined in ^[26] and edge irregular reflexive labeling of categorical product of two paths is determined in ^[27]. This shows the importance of this product in different areas. Ahmad ^[28] determined the upper bounds of irregularity measures of categorical product of two connected graphs. The edge partition of graph $L_p\otimes L_q$ based on the degree of end vertices is given in . This edge partition is also given in ^[29]. For more understanding we depicted $L_9\otimes L_{10}$ in Figure 1.

Table 1. The edge partitions of

$L_p\otimes L_{q}$ .

L( $U_1$ ), L( $U_2$ )	Frequency
(1, 4)	4
(2, 2)	4
(2, 4)	4(p+q-6)
(4, 4)	2(p-3)(q-3)

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Figure 1. The graph of

$L_9\otimes L_{10}$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Theorem 3.1. Let $G$ be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth neighborhood multiplicative M-Zagreb indices for $G$ are:

$\S_1\left(G\right) = 122880\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right),$

$\S_2\left(G\right) = 262144\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right).$

Proof. From the definitions of $\S_1\left(G\right)$ , $\S_2\left(G\right)\$ and Table 1, we have

$\begin{align*} \S _{1} \left(G\right) = &\left|{{\mathrm{P}}}_{\left({\mathrm{1,4}}\right)}\right|\left({\mathrm{1+4}}\right) \times\left|{{\mathrm{P}}}_{\left({\mathrm{2,2}}\right)}\right|\left({\mathrm{2+2}}\right) \times\left|{{\mathrm{P}}}_{\left({\mathrm{2,4}}\right)}\right|\left({\mathrm{2+4}}\right) \times\left|{{\mathrm{P}}}_{\left({\mathrm{4,4}}\right)}\right|\left({\mathrm{4+4}}\right) \\ = &4\left({\mathrm{5}}\right)\times{\mathrm{4}}\left({\mathrm{4}}\right) \times{\mathrm{4}}\left({\mathrm{p+q}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{6}}\right)\left({\mathrm{6}}\right) \times{\mathrm{2}}\left({\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{3}}\right)\left({\mathrm{q}}{\mathrm{-}} {\mathrm{3}}\right)\left({\mathrm{8}}\right) \\ = &20\times{\mathrm{16}}\times{\mathrm{24}}\left({\mathrm{p+q}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{6}}\right) \times{\mathrm{16}}\left({\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{3}}\right)\left({\mathrm{q}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{3}}\right) \\ = &122880\left({{\mathrm{p}}}^{{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{q+p}}{{\mathrm{q}}}^{{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{3}}{{\mathrm{p}}}^{{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{3}}{{\mathrm{q}}}^{{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{12pq+27p+27q}}{\mathrm{-}}{\mathrm{54}}\right). \end{align*}$

Similarly,

$\begin{align*} \S_2\left(G\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\left(4\right)\times\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|\left(4\right)\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|(8)\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\left(16\right) \\ = &4\left(4\right)\times4\left(4\right)\times4\left(p+q-6\right)\left(8\right)\times2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right)\left(16\right) \\ = &262144\left(p+q-6\right)\left(pq-3p-3q+9\right) \\ = &262144\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right). \end{align*}$

The graphical representation of the Theorem 3.1 is given in Figure 2(a), (b).

Figure 2. The graphical representations of Theorems 3.1–3.4 with

$p$ and

$q$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Theorem 3.2. Let $G$ be a tensor product of two paths. Then the general fifth multiplicative Zagreb indices of $G$ are:

$\S_3\left(G\right) = 128(960)^{\alpha}\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right),$

$\S_5\left(G\right) = 128(2048)^{\alpha}\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right).$

Proof. From the definitions of ${\S }_3\left(G\right)$ and Table 1, we get

$\begin{align*} \S_3\left(G\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|{\left(1+4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|{\left(2+2\right)}^{\alpha} \times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|{\left(2+4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|{\left(4+4\right)}^{\alpha} \\ = &4(5)^{\alpha}\times4{\left(4\right)}^{\alpha}\times4\left(p+q-6\right){\left(6\right)}^{\alpha} \times2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right){\left(8\right)}^{\alpha} \\ = &128(960)^{\alpha}\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right). \end{align*}$

From the definitions of $\S_5\left(G\right)$ and Table 1, we obtain

$\begin{align*} \S_5\left(G\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|{\left(1\ \times\ 4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|{\left(2\times2\right)}^{\alpha}\times \left|P_{(2,4)}\right|{\left(2\times4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|{\left(4\times4\right)}^{\alpha} \\ = &4{\left(4\right)}^{\alpha}\times4{\left(4\right)}^{\alpha}\times4\left(p+q-6\right){\left(8\right)}^{\alpha}\times 2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right){\left(16\right)}^{\alpha} \\ = &128(2048)^{\alpha}\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right). \end{align*}$

Theorem 3.3. Let $G$ be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative hyper-Zagreb indices for $G$ are:

$\S_4\left(G\right) = 117964800\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right),$

$\S_6\left(G\right) = 536870912\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right).$

Proof. From the definitions of ${\S }_4\left(G\right),$ ${\S }_6\left(G\right)$ and Table 1, we obtain

$\begin{align*} {\S }_4\left(G\right) = &\left|P_{\left(1,4\right)}\right|{\left(1+4\right)}^2\times \left|P_{\left(2,2\right)}\right|{\left(2+2\right)}^2\times\left|P_{\left(2,4\right)}\right| {\left(2+4\right)}^2\times\left|P_{\left(4,4\right)}\right|{\left(4+4\right)}^2\\ = &4{\left(5\right)}^2\times4{\left(4\right)}^2\times4\left(p+q-6\right){\left(6\right)}^2 \times2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right){\left(8\right)}^2\\ = &117964800\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \S_6\left(G\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|{\left(1\ \times\ 4\right)}^2\times\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|{\left(22\right)}^2\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|{\left(24\right)}^2 \times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|{\left(44\right)}^2 \\ = &4{\left(4\right)}^2\times4{\left(4\right)}^2\times4\left(p+q-6\right){\left(8\right)}^2 \times2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right){\left(16\right)}^2 \\ = &536870912\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right). \end{align*}$

The graphical representations of Theorems 3.2 and 3.3 are shown in – with $p$ and $q$ , respectively.

Theorem 3.4. The fifth multiplicative product connectivity index § ${}_{8\ }$ for tensor product of two path $G$ is:

$\S_8\left(G\right) = \frac{1}{4096\sqrt{2}\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right)}.$

Proof. From the formulation of $\S_8\left(G\right)$ and Table 1, it is easy to calculate that

$\begin{align*} \S_8\left(G\right) = &\frac{1}{\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\right)}} \times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\right)}} \times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(8\right)}}\times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\sqrt{(16)}}\\ = &\frac{1}{4\sqrt{\left(4\right)}}\times\frac{1}{4\sqrt{\left(4\right)}} \times\frac{1}{4\left(p+q-6\right)\sqrt{\left(8\right)}}\times\frac{1}{2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right)\sqrt{\left(16\right)}}\\ = &\frac{1}{4096\sqrt{2}\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right)}. \end{align*}$

The graphical representation of fifth multiplicative product connectivity index $\S_8$ is shown in with $p$ and $q$ .

Theorem 3.5. Let $G$ be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index of a graph $G$ is:

$\S_9\left(G\right) = \frac{1}{1024\sqrt{15}\left(p^2q+pq^2-3p^2-3q^2-12pq+27p+27q-54\right)}.$

Proof. From the formulation of $\S_9\left(G\right)$ and Table 1, we get

$\begin{align*} \S_9 = &\frac{1}{\left|P_{(1,4)} \right|\sqrt{\left(5\right)} } \times \frac{1}{\left|P_{(2,2)} \right|\sqrt{\left(4\right)} } \times \frac{1}{\left|P_{(2,4)} \right|\sqrt{6} } \times \frac{1}{\left|P_{(4,4)} \right|\sqrt{8} } \\ = &\frac{1}{4\sqrt{\left(5\right)} } \times \frac{1}{4\sqrt{\left(4\right)} } \times \frac{1}{4\left(p+q-6\right)\sqrt{6} } \times \frac{1}{2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right)\sqrt{8} }\\ = &\frac{1}{1024\sqrt{15} \times \left(p^{2} q+pq^{2} -3p^{2} -3q^{2} -12pq+27p+27q-54\right)}. \end{align*}$

Theorem 3.6. Let $G$ be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index $\S_{10}$ of a graph $G$ is:

$\S_{10}\left(G\right) = \frac{{\mathrm{64}}\sqrt{{\mathrm{2}}}}{\sqrt{{\mathrm{15}}}}.$

Proof. By the definition of $\S_{10}\left(G\right)$ and using the values of Table 1, we have

$\begin{align*} \S_{10} = &\frac{2\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\right)}}{\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(5\right)}} \times\frac{2\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\right)}}{\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\right)}} \times\frac{2\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(8\right)}}{\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|\sqrt{6}} \times\frac{2\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\sqrt{(16)}}{\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\sqrt{(8)}} \\ = &\frac{24\sqrt{4}}{4\sqrt{5}}\times\frac{24\sqrt{4}}{4\sqrt{4}} \times\frac{24\left(p+q-6\right)\sqrt{8}}{4\left(p+q-6\right)\sqrt{6}}\times\frac{22\left(p-3\right) \left(q-3\right)\sqrt{16}}{2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right)\sqrt{8}} \\ = &\frac{64\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{15}}. \end{align*}$

The graphical representations of fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index $\S_{9}$ and fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index $\S_{10}$ is shown in Figure 3(a), (b), respectively.

Figure 3. The graphical representations of Theorems 3.5–3.7 with

$p$ and

$q$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Theorem 3.7. Let $G$ be a tensor product of two paths. Then the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind is

$\S_7\left(G\right) = 1024\sqrt{2}\left(p^2q-3p^2+pq^2-12pq+27p-3q^2+27q-54\right),$

the fifth multiplicative harmonic index is

$\S_{11}\left(G\right) = \frac{1}{64\sqrt{15}\left(p^2q-3p^2+pq^2-12pq+27p-3q^2+27q-54\right)},$

the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index is

$\S_{12}\left(G\right) = 251658240\left(p+q-6\right)\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right).$

Proof. By using , in the formulation of $\S_7\left(G\right)$ $\S_{11}\left(G\right)$ and $\S_{12}\left(G\right)$ we get

$\begin{align*} \S_7& = \left|P_{(1,4)} \right|\sqrt{\left(1\times 4\right)}\times \left|P_{(2,2)} \right|\sqrt{\left(2\times 2\right)} \times \left|P_{(2,4)} \right|\sqrt{\left(2\times 4\right)}\times \left|P_{(4,4)} \right|\sqrt{\left(4\times 4\right)}\\ & = 4\sqrt{4} \times 4\sqrt{4} \times 4\left(p+q-6\right)\sqrt{8} \times 2\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right)\sqrt{16}\\ & = 1024\sqrt{2}\left(p^2q-3p^2+pq^2-12pq+27p-3q^2+27q-54\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \S_{11}\left(G\right)& = \frac{2}{\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(5\right)}} \times\frac{2}{\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\right)}}\times\frac{2}{\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|\sqrt{6}} \times\frac{2}{\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\sqrt{(8)}}\\ & = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\left(5\right)}}\times\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\left(4\right)}}\times\frac{1}{2\left(p+q-6\right)\sqrt{6}} \times\frac{1}{\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right)\sqrt{8}}\\ & = \frac{1}{64\sqrt{15}\left(p^2q-3p^2+pq^2-12pq+27p-3q^2+27q-54\right)}, \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} {\S }_{12}\left(G\right)& = \left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\left(1\times\ 4\right)\left(1+4\right)\times\left|P_{(2,2)}\right|\left(2\times2\right)\left(2+2\right)\\ &\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| \left(2\times4\right)\left(2+4\right)\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\left(4\times4\right)\left(4+4\right) \\ & = 251658240\left(p+q-6\right)\left(p-3\right)\left(q-3\right). \end{align*}$

The graphical representations of fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind, the fifth multiplicative harmonic index and the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index are shown in Figure 3(c)–(e), respectively.

4. The neighborhood degree based multiplicative topological indices of tetrahedral diamond lattice ${\Omega}$

A tetrahedral diamond lattice $\Omega$ is made up of $t$ layers, each of which extends to $l_t$ . The initial layer only has one vertex, while the subsequent layer is isomorphic to $S_4$ because it contains four vertices. Each layer $l$ for ${\mathrm{t\ }}{\mathrm{\ge }}3$ has $\sum^{l-2}_{k = 1}{}k$ hexagons with 3 pendent vertices. We may set up each additional layer's vertices in accordance with the depth initial marking. To be more specific, we may use layer $l$ to represent labels from $\sum^{l-2}_{k = 1}{}k^2{\mathrm{+1\ to\ }}\sum^{l-2}_{k = 1}{}k^2$ . The vertex set of a $\Omega$ of size $t$ contains vertices that are ${\mathrm{a\ and\ b}}$ while the edge set has edges that are $\frac{2}{3}\left(t^2-t\right).$ $\Omega$ have no odd cycles, making them bipartite graphs. The graph of tetrahedral diamond lattice $\Omega$ is shown in Figure 4 and the edge partition based on the degree of end vertices is given in Table 2.

Figure 4. The 5-dimension

$\Omega$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Table 2. The edge partition of tetrahedral diamond lattice

$\Omega$ .

L( $U_1$ ), L( $U_2$ )	Frequency
(1, 4)	4
(2, 4)	12(t-2)
(3, 4)	6(t-2)(t-3)
(4, 4)	$2/3(t^3-9t^2+26t-24)$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Theorem 4.1. Let $\Omega$ tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth neighborhood multiplicative M-Zagreb indices for $\Omega$ are:

$\S_1\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = 40320\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right),$

$\S_2\left(\Omega\right) = 1179648\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right).$

Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.1), we get

$\begin{align*} \S_1\left({\mathrm{\Omega}}\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\left(1+4\right)\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|\left(2+4\right) \times\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|\left(3+4\right)\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\left(4+4\right)\\ = &4\left(5\right)\times12\left(t-2\right)\left(6\right)\times6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right) \left(7\right)\times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\left(8\right)\\ = &40320\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \S_2\left({\mathrm{\Omega}}\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\left(1\times4\right)\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| \left(2\times4\right)\times\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|\left(3\times4\right)\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right| \left(4\times4\right)\\ = &4\left(4\right)\times12\left(t-2\right)\left(8\right)\times6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right)\left(12\right) \times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\left(16\right)\\ = &1179648\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right). \end{align*}$

The graphical representations of $\S_1\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)\$ and $\S_2\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right){\mathrm{\ }}$ with $t$ is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5. The graphical representations of

$\S_1\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ –

$\S_6\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ and

$\S_8\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ with

$t$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Theorem 4.2. Let $\Omega$ tetrahedral diamond lattice then the general fifth multiplicative Zagreb indices of $\Omega$ are:

$\S_3\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = 192\left(1680\right)^{\alpha}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right),$

$\S_5\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = 192(6144)^{\alpha}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-7t^2+26t-24\right).$

Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.2), we get

$\begin{align*} \S_3\left(G\right) = &\left[\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|{\left(1+4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| {\left(2+4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|{\left(3+4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|{\left(4+4\right)}^{\alpha}\right]\\ = &4{\left(5\right)}^{\alpha}\times12\left(t-2\right){\left(6\right)}^{\alpha}\times6\left(t-2\right) \left(t-3\right){\left(7\right)}^{\alpha}\times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right){\left(8\right)}^{\alpha}\\ = &192\left(1680\right)^{\alpha}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \S_5\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = &\left[\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|{\left(1\times 4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| {\left(2\times4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|{\left(3\times4\right)}^{\alpha}\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right| {\left(4\times4\right)}^a\right]\\ = &[4{\left(4\right)}^{\alpha}\times12\left(t-2\right){\left(8\right)}^{\alpha}\times6\left(t-2\right) \left(t-3\right){\left(12\right)}^{\alpha}\times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right) {\left(16\right)}^a\\ = &192(6144)^a\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right) \left(t^3-7t^2+26t-24\right). \end{align*}$

Theorem 4.3. Let $\Omega$ tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative hyper-Zagreb indices $\Omega$ are:

$\S_4\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = 541900800\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right),$

$\S_6\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = 7247757312\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-7t^2+26t-24\right).$

Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.3), we get

$\begin{align*} \S_4\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|{\left(1+4\right)}^2 \times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|{\left(2+4\right)}^2\times\left|P_{(3,4)}\right| {\left(3+4\right)}^2\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|{\left(4+4\right)}^2\\ = &4{\left(5\right)}^2\times12\left(t-2\right){\left(6\right)}^2\times6\left(t-2\right) \left(t-3\right){\left(7\right)}^2\times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right){\left(8\right)}^2\\ = &4\times12\times6\times\frac{2}{3}\times{\left(5\times6\times7\times8\right)}^2{\left(t-2\right)}^2 \left(t-3\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\\ = &192{\left(1680\right)}^2\left(t^2+4-4t\right)\left(t-3\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\\ = &541900800\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \S_6\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|{\left(1\times4\right)}^2\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| {\left(2\times4\right)}^2\times\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|{\left(3\times4\right)}^2\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right| {\left(4\times4\right)}^2\\ = &4{\left(4\right)}^2\times12\left(t-2\right){\left(8\right)}^2\times6 \left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right){\left(12\right)}^2\times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right) {\left(16\right)}^2\\ = &4\times12\times6\times\frac{2}{3}\times(4\times8\times12\times16)^2\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-7t^2+26t-24\right)\\ = &7247757312\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-7t^2+26t-24\right). \end{align*}$

The graphical representations of $\S_3\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ – $\S_6\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right),$ with $t$ is shown in Figure 5.

Theorem 4.4. Let $\Omega$ tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index $\Omega$ are:

$\S_8\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = \frac{1}{6144\sqrt{6}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)}.$

Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.4), we get

$\begin{align*} \S_8 = &\frac{1}{\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(1\times4\right)}}\times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(2,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(2\times4\right)}} \times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(3\times4\right)}}\times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(4,4)}\right| \sqrt{\left(4\times4\right)}}\\ = &\frac{1}{4\sqrt{\left(4\right)}}\times\frac{1}{12\left(t-2\right) \sqrt{\left(8\right)}}\times\frac{1}{6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right)\sqrt{\left(12\right)}} \times\frac{1}{\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\sqrt{16}}\\ = &\frac{1}{6144\sqrt{6}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)}. \end{align*}$

The graphical representation of the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index $\S_8\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ with $t$ is shown in Figure 5.

Theorem 4.5. Let $\Omega$ tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index $\Omega$ is:

$\S_9\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = \frac{1}{768\sqrt{210}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)}.$

Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.5), we get

$\begin{align*} \S_9\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = &\frac{1}{\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(1+4\right)}}\times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| \sqrt{\left(2+4\right)}}\times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(3+4\right)}} \times\frac{1}{\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4+4\right)}}\\ = &\frac{1}{4\sqrt{\left(5\right)}} \times\frac{1}{12\left(t-2\right)\sqrt{\left(6\right)}}\times\frac{1}{6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right) \sqrt{\left(7\right)}}\times\frac{1}{\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\sqrt{\left(8\right)}}\\ = &\frac{1}{768\sqrt{210} \left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)}. \end{align*}$

Theorem 4.6. Let $\Omega$ tetrahedral diamond lattice then the fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index $\Omega$ is

$\S_{10}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = \frac{128\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{35}}.$

Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.6), we get

$\begin{align*} \S_{10} = &\frac{2\left|P_{\left(1,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(1\times4\right)}} {\left|P_{\left(1,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(1+4\right)}} \times\frac{2\left|P_{\left(2,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(2\times4\right)}} {\left|P_{\left(2,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(2+4\right)}} \times\frac{2\left|P_{\left(3,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(3\times4\right)}} {\left|P_{\left(3,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(3+4\right)}} \times\frac{2\left|P_{\left(4,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\times4\right)}} {\left|P_{\left(4,4\right)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4+4\right)}}\\ = &\frac{2\times4\sqrt{4}}{4\sqrt{5}}\times\frac{2\times12\left(t-2\right) \sqrt{8}}{12\left(t-2\right)\sqrt{6}}\times\frac{2\times6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right) \sqrt{12}}{6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right)\sqrt{7}}\times\frac{2\times\frac{2}{3} \left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\sqrt{16}}{\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\sqrt{8}}\\ = &\frac{128\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{35}}. \end{align*}$

Theorem 4.7. Let $\Omega$ tetrahedral diamond lattice. Then the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind is

$\S_7\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = 6144\sqrt{6}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right),$

the fifth multiplicative harmonic index is

$\S_{11}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = \frac{1}{48\sqrt{105}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)},$

the fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index is

$\S_{12}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = 1981808640\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-7t^2+26t-24\right).$

Proof. Using the values of Table 2 in Eq (2.7), we get

$\begin{align*} \S_7\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(1\times 4\right)}\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| \sqrt{\left(2\times4\right)} \times\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(3\times4\right)}\times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4\times4\right)}\\ = &4\sqrt{\left(4\right)}\times12\left(t-2\right)\sqrt{\left(8\right)}\times6\left(t-2\right) \left(t-3\right)\sqrt{\left(12\right)}\times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\sqrt{16}\\ = &6144\sqrt{6}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right) \left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right), \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \S_{11}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = &\frac{2}{\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(1+4\right)}}\times\frac{2}{\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| \sqrt{\left(2+4\right)}}\times\frac{2}{\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(3+4\right)}} \times\frac{2}{\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\sqrt{\left(4+4\right)}}\\ = &\frac{2}{4\sqrt{\left(5\right)}}\times\frac{2}{12\left(t-2\right)\sqrt{\left(6\right)}} \times\frac{2}{6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right)\sqrt{\left(7\right)}}\times\frac{2}{\frac{2}{3} \left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)\sqrt{\left(8\right)}}\\ = &\frac{1}{48\sqrt{105}\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)}, \end{align*}$

$\begin{align*} \S_{12}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right) = &\left|P_{(1,4)}\right|\left(1\times4\right)\left(1+4\right)\times\left|P_{(2,4)}\right| \left(2\times4\right)\left(2+4\right)\\ \times&\left|P_{(3,4)}\right|\left(3\times4\right)\left(3+4\right) \times\left|P_{(4,4)}\right|\left(4\times4\right)\left(4+4\right)\\ = &4\left(4\right)5\times12\left(t-2\right)\left(8\right)6\times6\left(t-2\right)\left(t-3\right) \left(12\right)(7)\times\frac{2}{3}\left(t^3-9t^2+26t-24\right)16\left(8\right)\\ = &1981808640\left(t^3-7t^2+16t-12\right)\left(t^3-7t^2+26t-24\right). \end{align*}$

The graphical representations of the fifth multiplicative product connectivity index of first kind $\S_7\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ , the fifth multiplicative sum-connectivity index $\S_9\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ , the fifth multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index $\S_{10}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ , fifth multiplicative harmonic index $\S_{11}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ and fifth multiplicative redefined Zagreb index $\S_{12}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ are shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6. The graphical representations of

$\S_7\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ and

$\S_9\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ –

$\S_{12}\left({\mathrm{\Omega }}\right)$ with

$t$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

5. Conclusions

This study contains a novel method for computing the topological indices of different chemical networks and namely the networks are product of graphs ( $\mathcal{L}$ ) and tetrahedral diamond lattices ( $\Omega$ ). The mathematical topological properties of molecular structure descriptors, specifically those that depend on graph degrees, are examined in this research work. We derived neighborhood multiplicative topological indices and concise mathematical analysis for product of graphs ( $\mathcal{L}$ ) and tetrahedral diamond lattices ( $\Omega$ ). A few topological descriptors are studied namely, the fifth multiplicative Zagreb index, the general fifth-multiplicative Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative hyper-Zagreb index, the fifth-multiplicative product connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative sum connectivity index, the fifth-multiplicative geometric-arithmetic index, the fifth-multiplicative harmonic index, and the fifth-multiplicative redefined Zagreb index are the topological indices that are taken into consideration. Moreover, a comparative study is also included in this work.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research of Jazan University for supporting financially this work under Waed grant No. (W44-91).

Conflict of interest

I declare that there is no conflict of interest of this article.

References

[1]	P. Roy, P. Rao, J. Gajre, K. Katake, A. Jagtap, Y. Gajmal, Comprehensive analysis for fraud detection of credit cards through machine learning. In: 2021 International conference on emerging smart computing and informatics (ESCI), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI50559.2021.9397029
[2]	J. Liu, X. Gu, C. Shang, Quantitative detection of financial fraud based on deep learning with combination of E-commerce big data, Complexity, 2020 (2020), 6685888. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6685888 doi: 10.1155/2020/6685888
[3]	E. Kim, J. Lee, H. Shin, H. Yang, S. Cho, S. K. Nam, et al., Champion-challenger analysis for credit card fraud detection: Hybrid ensemble and deep learning, Expert Syst. Appl., 128 (2019), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.042 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.042
[4]	A. RB, S. K. KR, Credit card fraud detection using artificial neural network, Global Transit. Proc., 2 (2021), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gltp.2021.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.gltp.2021.01.006
[5]	F. K. Alarfaj, I. Malik, H. U. Khan, N. Almusallam, M. Ramzan, M. Ahmed, Credit card fraud detection using state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning algorithms, IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 39700–39715. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166891 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166891
[6]	O. Voican, Credit card fraud detection using deep learning techniques, Informatica Economica, 25 (2021), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.24818/issn14531305/25.1.2021.06 doi: 10.24818/issn14531305/25.1.2021.06
[7]	X. Zhang, Y. Han, W. Xu, Q. Wang, HOBA: A novel feature engineering methodology for credit card fraud detection with a deep learning architecture, Inform. Sci., 557 (2021), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.023 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.023
[8]	J. I. Z. Chen, K. L. Lai, Deep convolution neural network model for credit-card fraud detection and alert, J. Artif. Intell. Capsule Netw., 3 (2021), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.36548/jaicn.2021.2.003 doi: 10.36548/jaicn.2021.2.003
[9]	G. Pratuzaitė, N. Maknickienė, Investigation of credit cards fraud detection by using deep learning and classification algorithms. In: 11th International scientific conference "business and management 2020", 2020,389–396. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2020.558
[10]	J. Forough, S. Momtazi, Ensemble of deep sequential models for credit card fraud detection, Appl. Soft Comput., 99 (2021), 106883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106883 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106883
[11]	A. R. Khalid, N. Owoh, O. Uthmani, M. Ashawa, J. Osamor, J. Adejoh, Enhancing credit card fraud detection: An ensemble machine learning approach, Big Data Cogn Comput, 8 (2024), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8010006 doi: 10.3390/bdcc8010006
[12]	P. Raghavan, N. El Gayar, Fraud detection using machine learning and deep learning. In: 2019 international conference on computational intelligence and knowledge economy (ICCIKE), 2019,334–339. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIKE47802.2019.9004231
[13]	T. K. Dang, T. C. Tran, L. M. Tuan, M. V. Tiep, Machine learning based on resampling approaches and deep reinforcement learning for credit card fraud detection systems, Appl. Sci., 11 (2021), 10004. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110004 doi: 10.3390/app112110004
[14]	A. Alharbi, M. Alshammari, O. D. Okon, A. Alabrah, H. T. Rauf, H. Alyami, et al., A novel text2IMG mechanism of credit card fraud detection: A deep learning approach, Electronics, 11 (2022), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050756 doi: 10.3390/electronics11050756
[15]	S. Sanober, I. Alam, S. Pande, F. Arslan, K. P. Rane, B. K. Singh, et al., An enhanced secure deep learning algorithm for fraud detection in wireless communication, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Com., 2021 (2021), 6079582. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6079582 doi: 10.1155/2021/6079582
[16]	N. Nguyen, T. Duong, T. Chau, V. H. Nguyen, T. Trinh, D. Tran, et al., A proposed model for card fraud detection based on CatBoost and deep neural network, IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 96852–96861. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3205416 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3205416
[17]	D. Almhaithawi, A. Jafar, M. Aljnidi, Example-dependent cost-sensitive credit cards fraud detection using SMOTE and Bayes minimum risk, SN Appl. Sci., 2 (2020), 1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03375-w doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-03375-w
[18]	A. A. Taha, S. J. Malebary, An intelligent approach to credit card fraud detection using an optimized light gradient boosting machine, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 25579–25587. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971354 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971354
[19]	V. R. Ganji, A. Chaparala, R. Sajja, Shuffled shepherd political optimization‐based deep learning method for credit card fraud detection, Concurr. Comp. Pract. E., 35 (2023), e7666. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.7666 doi: 10.1002/cpe.7666
[20]	A. Dhyani, A. Bansal, A. Jain, S. Seniaray, Credit card fraud detection using machine learning and incremental learning, In: Proceedings of international conference on recent trends in computing, Singapore: Springer, 2023,337–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8825-7_29
[21]	V. S. S. Karthik, A. Mishra, U. S. Reddy, Credit card fraud detection by modelling behaviour pattern using hybrid ensemble model, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 47 (2022), 1987–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06147-9 doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-06147-9
[22]	G. Hu, Y. Zheng, L. Abualigah, A. G. Hussien, DETDO: An adaptive hybrid dandelion optimizer for engineering optimization, Adv. Eng. Inform., 57 (2023), 102004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102004 doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102004
[23]	W. Yang, H. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, T. Li, Self-supervised discriminative representation learning by fuzzy autoencoder, ACM T. Intel. Syst. Technol., 14 (2022), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555777 doi: 10.1145/3555777
[24]	H. Ghafourian, S. S. Ershadi, D. K. Voronkova, S. Omidvari, L. Badrizadeh, M. L. Nehdi, Minimizing single-family homes' carbon dioxide emissions and life cycle costs: An improved billiard-based optimization algorithm approach, Buildings, 13 (2023), 1815. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071815 doi: 10.3390/buildings13071815
[25]	I. D. Mienye, Y. Sun, A machine learning method with hybrid feature selection for improved credit card fraud detection, Appl. Sci., 13 (2023), 7254. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127254 doi: 10.3390/app13127254

This article has been cited by:

1.	Ali Ahmad, Ali N. A. Koam, Ibtisam Masmali, Muhammad Azeem, Haleemah Ghazwani, Connection number topological aspect for backbone DNA networks, 2023, 46, 1292-8941, 10.1140/epje/s10189-023-00381-9
2.	Ibtisam Masmali, Muhammad Azeem, Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Ali Ahmad, Ali N. A. Koam, Study of some graph theoretical parameters for the structures of anticancer drugs, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-64086-5
3.	Hani Shaker, Sabeen Javaid, Usman Babar, Muhammad Kamran Siddiqui, Asim Naseem, Characterizing superlattice topologies via fifth M-Zagreb polynomials and structural indices, 2023, 138, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04645-3
4.	Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Ibtisam Masmali, Muhammad Azeem, Mehwish Sarfraz, Naeem Jan, Several intuitionistic fuzzy hamy mean operators with complex interval values and their application in assessing the quality of tourism services, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0305319, 10.1371/journal.pone.0305319
5.	Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Maryam Salem Alatawi, Adnan Khalil, Muhammad Azeem, Ammar Alsinai, On the Constant Partition Dimension of Some Generalized Families of Toeplitz Graph, 2024, 2024, 2314-4629, 10.1155/2024/4721104
6.	Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Raed Qahiti, Muhammad Azeem, Waleed Hamali, Shonak Bansal, Enhanced Chemical Insights into Fullerene Structures via Modified Polynomials, 2024, 2024, 1076-2787, 10.1155/2024/9220686
7.	Ali Ahmad, Ali N. A. Koam, Muhammad Azeem, Ibtisam Masmali, Rehab Alharbi, Eyas Mahmoud, Edge based metric dimension of various coffee compounds, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0294932, 10.1371/journal.pone.0294932
8.	Muhammad Shoaib Sardar, Khalil Hadi Hakami, Vinod Kumar Tiwari, QSPR Analysis of Some Alzheimer’s Compounds via Topological Indices and Regression Models, 2024, 2024, 2090-9063, 10.1155/2024/5520607
9.	Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Shahid Zaman, Ibtisam Masmali, Haleemah Ghazwani, Fundamental aspects of the molecular topology of fuchsine acid dye with connection numbers, 2024, 47, 1292-8941, 10.1140/epje/s10189-024-00418-7
10.	Haleemah Ghazwani, Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Ali Ahmad, Muhammad Azeem, Ali N. A. Koam, Applications of magnesium iodide structure via modified-polynomials, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-64344-6
11.	Ali N.A. Koam, Muhammad Azeem, Ali Ahmad, Ibtisam Masmali, Connection number-based molecular descriptors of skin cancer drugs, 2024, 15, 20904479, 102750, 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102750
12.	Khawlah Alhulwah, Ali N.A. Koam, Nasreen Almohanna, Muhammad Faisal Nadeem, Ali Ahmad, Topological indices and their correlation with structural properties of carbon nanotube Y-junctions, 2025, 70, 22113797, 108141, 10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108141

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)