Crossed modules are algebraic structures that generalize the concept of group extensions. They involve group-like objects (often groups or groupoids) with additional structure and mappings between them that satisfy certain properties. Generalized crossed modules further extend this concept to higher-dimensional settings or more general algebraic contexts. In this paper, we studied the fibration and co-fibration of generalized crossed modules.
Citation: Hatice Gülsün Akay. (Co-)fibration of generalized crossed modules[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32782-32796. doi: 10.3934/math.20241568
[1] | Junjie Li, Gurpreet Singh, Onur Alp İlhan, Jalil Manafian, Yusif S. Gasimov . Modulational instability, multiple Exp-function method, SIVP, solitary and cross-kink solutions for the generalized KP equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7555-7584. doi: 10.3934/math.2021441 |
[2] | Min Han, Bin Pei . An averaging principle for stochastic evolution equations with jumps and random time delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 39-51. doi: 10.3934/math.2021003 |
[3] | Hicham Saber, Tariq Alraqad, Rashid Abu-Dawwas . On graded s-prime submodules. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2510-2524. doi: 10.3934/math.2021152 |
[4] | Xiao Qi, Tianyao Duan, Lihua Wang, Huan Guo . CATL's stock price forecasting and its derived option pricing: a novel extended fNSDE-net method. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2444-2465. doi: 10.3934/math.2025114 |
[5] | Guocheng Li, Pan Zhao, Minghua Shi, Gensheng Li . A hybrid framework for mean-CVaR portfolio selection under jump-diffusion processes: Combining cross-entropy method with beluga whale optimization. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 19911-19942. doi: 10.3934/math.2024972 |
[6] | Nafissa Toureche Trouba, Mohamed E. M. Alngar, Reham M. A. Shohib, Haitham A. Mahmoud, Yakup Yildirim, Huiying Xu, Xinzhong Zhu . Novel solitary wave solutions of the (3+1)–dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with generalized Kudryashov self–phase modulation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 4374-4411. doi: 10.3934/math.2025202 |
[7] | Fahad Sikander, Firdhousi Begam, Tanveer Fatima . On submodule transitivity of QTAG-modules. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9303-9313. doi: 10.3934/math.2023467 |
[8] | Ali Yahya Hummdi, Amr Elrawy, Ayat A. Temraz . Neutrosophic modules over modules. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35964-35977. doi: 10.3934/math.20241705 |
[9] | Shuo Xu, Chunrui Zhang . Spatiotemporal patterns induced by cross-diffusion on vegetation model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14076-14098. doi: 10.3934/math.2022776 |
[10] | Saqib Mazher Qurashi, Ferdous Tawfiq, Qin Xin, Rani Sumaira Kanwal, Khushboo Zahra Gilani . Different characterization of soft substructures in quantale modules dependent on soft relations and their approximations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11684-11708. doi: 10.3934/math.2023592 |
Crossed modules are algebraic structures that generalize the concept of group extensions. They involve group-like objects (often groups or groupoids) with additional structure and mappings between them that satisfy certain properties. Generalized crossed modules further extend this concept to higher-dimensional settings or more general algebraic contexts. In this paper, we studied the fibration and co-fibration of generalized crossed modules.
Fibred categories were introduced by Grothendieck in [10]. In [9], he established the category of fibrations over a fixed base category B and demonstrated that it is a reflective subcategory of the category of all categories over B. Additionally, he discussed the preservation of limits by fibrations and applied some results to categories of sheaves. Furthermore, he discussed co-fibrations and dualized the results on concerning fibrations.
In [5], Brown and Sivera explored fibred and co-fibred categories, particularly focusing on certain colimit calculations of algebraic homotopical invariants for spaces. They emphasized the potential for such calculations based on various Higher Homotopy van Kampen Theorems, detailed in [3]. Among their work, they established that fibred categories preserve colimits, that is, if Ψ:X→B is a fibration and A∈B, then the inclusion map X/A→X preserves colimits of connected diagrams. Also, they gave the relation between pushout and co-fibration. Moreover, they illustrated these results for homotopical calculations in groupoids, as well as for modules and crossed modules, in both cases over groupoids.
In [11], it was shown that the category of crossed modules over commutative algebras is both fibred and co-fibred. They established that, if φ:P→Q is a ring morphism, then there exists a pair of adjoint functors (φ∗,φ∗), where φ∗:XMod/Q→XMod/P and φ∗:XMod/P→XMod/Q, given by pullback and induced crossed modules, respectively. In [7], the fibration of the category of 2-crossed modules over groups was studied.
A crossed module of groups (P,C,∂) is defined by a group morphism ∂:P→C together with a (left) action of C on P satisfying the following relations:
CM1) ∂(cp)=c∂(p)c−1,
CM2) ∂(p1)p2=p1p2p−11,
for all p,p1,p2∈P and c∈C. A crossed module is called crossed-C module when it has the same fixed codomain C. Crossed modules of groups were given first in [13,14]. The author defined this structure as models for (homotopy) 2-types.
Generalized crossed modules were introduced by Yavari and Salemkar in [15]. They defined the generalized crossed module on a group morphism ∂:P→C with arbitrary actions of C on C and P on P instead of the usual conjugation actions. Thus, they generalized the concept of crossed module. Furthermore, they studied the relations between epimorphisms and surjective morphisms.
The pullback crossed module of groups was given by Brown and Higgins in [4]. They constructed it over a crossed C-module and a fixed group morphism ν:G→C, which led to the definition of a crossed C-module in the sense of a pullback diagram. This construction yielded the definition of a functor ν⋆:XMod/G→XMod/C, which has a left adjoint to the induced functor. (Co)-limits of crossed modules were studied for various algebraic structures over time [1,2,6,8,12].
In this paper, we give the notions of fibration and (co-)fibration of generalized crossed modules in detail. We then construct the pullback and induced generalized crossed modules. Also, we get a functor
ν⋆:GCM/C→GCM/G, |
which has a right adjoint functor, that is
ν⋆:GCM/G→GCM/C. |
We recall the definition of a generalized crossed module from [15].
Definition 2.1. A generalized crossed module (G,C,∂) consists of a group morphism ∂:G→C, together with the following properties,
ⅰ) an action of G on G, denoted by g1⊙Gg2, for every g1,g2∈G,
ⅱ) an action of C on C, denoted by c1⊙Cc2, for every c1,c2∈C,
ⅲ) an action of C on G, denoted by cg, for every c∈C, g∈G,
satisfying the conditions:
GCM1) ∂(cg)=c⊙C∂(g),
GCM2) ∂(g)g′=g⊙Gg′,
for all g,g′∈G and c∈C. If ∂ only satisfies condition GCM1, we get a pre-generalized crossed module.
Remark 2.2. Throughout this paper, an action of G on G is denoted by ⋅ instead of ⊙G for any group G.
A morphism (f,f′):(G,C,∂)→(G′,C′,∂′) of generalized crossed modules consists of group morphisms f:G→G′ and f′:C→C′ such that the diagram
![]() |
is commutative, i.e., f′∂=∂′f and
f(cg)=f′(c)f(g) |
for all c∈C and g∈G. Thus, we get the category of generalized crossed modules, denoted by GCM.
Some examples of generalized crossed modules are given below:
Example 2.3. If (G,C,∂) is any crossed module, then it is also a generalized crossed module.
Example 2.4. Let ∂:G→C be a group morphism. If all actions are trivial, then ∂ becomes a generalized crossed module.
Example 2.5. Let C and G be two groups. If the action of G on G is trivial and the actions of C on C and C on G are arbitrary, then the trivial morphism 1:G→C is a generalized crossed module.
Example 2.6. Every group gives a generalized crossed module. If D is a group, then (D,D,idD) is a generalized crossed module by the arbitrary action of D on itself. Thus, we get the functor
λ:GRP→GCM, |
which is the right adjoint of the functor
λ′:GCM→GRP, |
where (D,C,∂) is a generalized crossed module and λ′(D,C,∂)=D.
Now, we give the definitions of fibration and co-fibrations of categories from [5].
Definition 3.1. Let Ψ:X→B be a functor. A morphism ψ:X′→X in X over υ:=Ψ(ψ) is called cartesian if and only if for all ν:B→B′ in B and ϕ:Y→X with Ψ(ϕ)=υν there is a unique morphism η:Y→X′ with Ψ(η)=ν and ϕ=ψη.
This is given by the following diagram:
![]() |
It is easy to show that ψ is an isomorphism if and only if ψ is a cartesian morphism over an isomorphism, and that cartesian morphisms are closed under composition.
A morphism β:Y→X′ is called vertical, with respect to Ψ, if and only if Ψ(β) is an identity morphism in B. In particular, for A∈B we write X/A called fibre over A, for the subcategory of X consistings of those morphisms β with Ψ(β)=idA.
Definition 3.2. The functor Ψ:X→B is a fibration or category fibred over B if and only if υ:B′→A in B and X in X/A there is a cartesian morphism ψ:X′→X over υ: Such a ψ called a cartesian lifting of X along υ.
In other words, in a category fibred over B, Ψ:X→B, we can pullback objects of X along any arrow of B.
Definition 3.3. Let Ψ:X→B be a functor. A morphism η:Y→X′ in X over ν:=Ψ(η) is called cocartesian if and only if for all υ:B′→A in B and ϕ:Y→X with Ψ(ϕ)=υν there is a unique morphism ψ:X′→X with Ψ(ψ)=υ and ϕ=ψη. This is given by the following diagram:
![]() |
It is easy to show that ν is an isomorphism if and only if ν is a cocartesian morphism over an isomorphism, and that cocartesian morphisms are closed under composition.
Definition 3.4. The functor Ψ:X→B is a co-fibration or category co-fibred over B if and only if ν:B→B′ in B and Y in X/B there is a cocartesian morphism η:Y→Y′ over ν: Such a η called a cartesian lifting of Y along ν.
Proposition 3.5. Let Ψ:X→B be a fibration of categories. Then η:Y→X′ in X over ν:B→B′ in B is cocartesian if and only if for all ϕ′:Y→X1 over ν there is an unique morphism η′:X′→X1 in X/B′ with ϕ′=η′η, [5].
In this section, we will show that the forgetful functor
θ:GCM→GRP, |
which takes (P,C,ι)∈GCM in its base group C, is a fibration.
Theorem 3.6. The forgetful functor θ:GCM→GRP is fibred.
Proof. To prove that θ is fibred, we will get the pullback generalized crossed module. Let (P,C,ι) be a generalized crossed module and let υ:G→C be a group morphism. Define
υ⋆(P)={(p,g)∈P×G∣ι(p)=υ(g)}, |
and ι⋆:υ⋆(P)→G by ι⋆(p,g)=g for all (p,g)∈υ⋆(P). The actions of G on G and υ⋆(P) on υ⋆(P) are componentwise, the action of G on υ⋆(P) is defined by
g(p,g′)=(υ(g)p,g⋅g′), |
for all g∈G and (p,g′)∈υ⋆(P). Then, (υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆) is a generalized crossed G-module with the following equations:
GCM1)
ι⋆(g(p,g′))=ι⋆(υ(g)p,g⋅g′)=g⋅g′=g⋅ι⋆(p,g′). |
GCM2)
ι⋆(p,g)(p′,g′)=g(p′,g′)=(υ(g)p′,g⋅g′)=(ι(p)p′,g⋅g′)=(p⋅p′,g⋅g′)=(p,g)⋅(p′,g′), |
for all (p,g),(p′,g′)∈υ⋆(P). Moreover, (υ′,υ):(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆)→(P,C,ι) is a generalized crossed module morphism with υ′(p,g)=p;
υ′(g′(p,g))=υ′(υ(g)p,g⋅g′)=υ(g)p=υ(g)υ′(p,g) |
for all (p,g)∈υ⋆(P) and g′∈G.
Suppose that f:T→G is any group morphism, S is a group and (g,υf):(S,T,β)→(P,C,ι) is a generalized crossed module morphism with p(g,υf)=υf. Then, there exists a unique generalized crossed module morphism (g⋆,f):(S,T,β)→(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆) such that
(υ′,υ)(g⋆,f)=(g,υf), p(g⋆,f)=f. |
We define g⋆(s)=(g(s),fβ(s)) for all s∈S. Considering the diagram below:
![]() |
For all t∈T and s∈S, we get
g⋆(ts)=(g(ts),fβ(ts))=(υf(t)g(s),f(t)⋅fβ(s))=f(t)(g(s),fβ(s))=f(t)(g⋆(s)), |
and
ι⋆g⋆(s)=ι⋆(g(s),fβ(s))=fβ(s). |
Then, (g⋆,f) is a generalized crossed module morphism. Furthermore, for all s∈S and t∈T, we get
(υ′,υ)(g⋆,f)(s,t)=(υ′,υ)(g⋆(s),f(t))=(υ′g⋆(s),υf(t))=(g(s),υf(t)). |
Then the diagram
![]() |
commutes. Finally, let (g⋆′,f′):(S,T,β)→(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆) be a generalized crossed module morphism as the same property of (g⋆,f). Clearly f′=f. Define g⋆′(s)=(p,g) for all s∈S and for some p∈P,g∈G. Then, for all s∈S,
g⋆′(s)=(p,g)=(υ′(p,g),ι⋆(p,g))=(υ′g⋆′(s),ι⋆g⋆′(s))=(g(s),f′β(s))=(g(s),fβ(s))=g⋆(s), |
so, we get
g⋆′(s)=(p,g)=(g(s),fβ(s))=g⋆(s). |
That is, (g⋆,f) is unique.
Consequently, we get a cartesian morphism (υ′,υ):(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆)→(P,C,ι), for group morphism υ:G→C and generalized crossed module (P,C,ι).
Corollary 3.7. In the category of generalized crossed module, (υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆) and the following diagram
![]() |
are called a pullback generalized crossed module and pullback diagram, respectively.
Example 3.8. Let i:N↪C be the inclusion map and N be a normal subgroup of C. (υ⋆(N),G,i⋆)≅(υ−1(N),G,i⋆) is the pullback generalized crossed module where,
υ⋆(N))={(n,g)∣i(n)=υ(g), n∈N, g∈G}≅{g∈G∣υ(g)=n, n∈N}≅υ−1(N). |
See the pullback diagram below:
![]() |
Particularly, if N=1, then υ⋆({1})≅kerυ and so (kerυ,G,i⋆) is a pullback generalized crossed module. Consequently, kernels are particular examples of pullbacks. Moreover, if υ is surjective and N=C, then υ⋆(C)≅G.
Example 3.9. Let 1:P→C be a generalized crossed module. Then,
υ⋆(P)={(p,g)∈P×G∣υ(g)=1(p)=1}≅P×kerυ. |
See the pullback diagram below:
![]() |
So, if υ is injective, then υ⋆(P)≅P. Furthermore, if P={1}, then υ⋆(P)≅kerυ.
Corollary 3.10. A pullback generalized crossed module (υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆) for the group morphism υ:G→C gives a functor
υ⋆:GCM/C→GCM/G, |
where objects and morphisms are defined as
υ⋆(P,C,ι)=(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆) |
and
υ⋆(f,idC)=(υ⋆f,idG) |
such that υ⋆f(p,g)=(fp,g).
Proposition 3.11. For each generalized crossed module morphism, (σ,idC):(P,C,ι)→(P′,C,ι′), there is a morphism
(υ⋆(σ),idG):(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆)→(υ⋆(P′),G,ι⋆′), |
which is a unique morphism and satisfies the following equality,
(σ,idC)(υ′,υ)=(υ″,υ)(υ⋆(σ),idG). |
Proof.
υ″(υ⋆σ(p,g))=υ″(σ(p),g)=σ(p)=σ(υ′(p,g))=συ′(p,g) |
for all (p,g)∈υ⋆(P). Thus, the diagram
![]() |
is commutative.
Proposition 3.12. If h1:G→C and h2:T→G are two morphisms of groups, then (h1h2)⋆ and h⋆2h⋆1 are naturally isomorphic, i.e.,
h⋆2h⋆1≃(h1h2)⋆. |
Proof. Given any generalized crossed module (P,C,ι), we define f:h⋆2h⋆1(P)→(h1h2)⋆(P) as f((p,h2(t)),t)=(p,t) for all ((p,h2(t)),t)∈h⋆2h⋆1(P). It is clear that f is well-defined and a group morphism. Also,
f(t′⋅(p,h2(t),t))=f((h2)(t′)⋅(p,h2(t)),t′t)=f(((h1(h2)(t′))⋅p,h2(t′)h2(t)),t′t)=f(((h1h2)(t′)⋅p,h2(t′t)),t′t)=((h1h2)(t′),t′t)=t′⋅(p,t)=t′⋅f((p,h2(t)),t) |
and
¯ι⋆f((p,h2(t)),t)=¯ι⋆(p,t)=t=idT¯¯ι⋆((p,h2(t)),t) |
for all ((p,h2(t)),t)∈h⋆2h⋆1(P). Thus, the diagram
![]() |
is commutative. Then, (f,idT) is a generalized crossed module morphism. It is clear that (f,idT) is an isomorphism.
Additionaly, for each generalized crossed module morphism (σ,idC):(P,C,ι)→(S,C,λ) and ((p,h2(t)),t)∈h⋆2h⋆1(P), we get
(((h1h2)⋆σ)fP)((p,h2(t)),t)=((h1h2)⋆σ)(p,t)=(σ(p),t)=fS((σ(p),h2(t),t))=fS(h⋆2h⋆1σ)((p,h2(t)),t), |
so, the diagram
![]() |
commutes.
Proposition 3.13. Let θ:GCM→GRP be fibred, υ:G→C be a group morphism and υ⋆:GCM/C→GCM/G is chosen. Then, there is a bijection,
GCMυ((S,G,ρ),(P,C,ι))≅GCM/G((S,G,ρ),(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆)), |
which is natural in (S,G,ρ)∈GCM/G and (P,C,ι)∈GCM/C where GCMυ((S,G,ρ),(P,C,ι)) consists of those morphisms f∈GCMυ((S,G,ρ),(P,C,ι)) with θ(f)=υ.
Proof. Define ϕ:GCMυ((S,G,ρ),(P,C,ι))→GCM/G((S,G,ρ),(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆)) by ϕ(g,υ)=(g⋆,idG) such that g⋆(s)=(g(s),ρ(s)). Consider that ϕ(g,idG)=ϕ(h,idG) for (g,υ),(h,υ)∈GCMυ((S,G,ρ),(P,C,ι)). Then, we get (g⋆,idG)=(h⋆,idG) and so (g(s),ρ(s))=(h(s),ρ(s)), namely g=h. Thus, ϕ is one to one. Assume that (g⋆,idG)∈GCM/G((S,G,ρ),(υ⋆(P),G,ι⋆)). Then, there is a morphism (υ1g⋆,υ)∈GCMυ((S,G,ρ),(P,C,ι)) where υ1(p,g)=p, such that ϕ(υ1g⋆,υ)=(g⋆,idG). Consider the following diagram:
![]() |
It is clear that ϕ(υ1g⋆,υ)=((υ1g⋆)⋆,idG) and then,
(υ1g⋆)⋆(s)=((υ1g⋆)(s),ρ(s))=(υ1(g(s),ρ(s)),ρ(s))=(g(s),ρ(s))=g⋆(s). |
Thus, ϕ is a bijection. Furthermore, the following diagram
![]() |
is commutative, since for (φ,idG):(S′,G,ρ′)→(S,G,ρ) and s′∈S′, then
(g⋆φ)(s′)=(g(φ(s′)),ρ(φ(s′)))=((gφ)(s′),(ρφ)(s′))=(gφ⋆)(s′) |
and
(−∘(φ,idG))(ϕ(g,υ))=(−∘(φ,idG))(g⋆,idG)=(g⋆φ,idG)=((gφ)⋆,idG)=ϕ′(gφ,υ)=(ϕ′(−∘(φ,idG)))(g,υ). |
Thus, ϕ is natural in (S,G,ρ). Moreover, for (σ,idC):(P,C,ι)→(P′,C,ι′), we get
(σg)⋆(s)=(σ(g(s)),ρ(s))=((σ)g(s),ρ(s))=(υ⋆σ)(g(s),ρ(s))=(υ⋆σ)g⋆(s) |
for s∈S and then
((υ⋆σ,idC)∘−)ϕ(g,υ)=(υ⋆σ,idC)(g⋆,idC)=((υ⋆σ)g⋆,idC)=((σg)⋆,idC)=ϕ″(σg,υ)=(ϕ″((φ,idC)∘−))(g,υ). |
Thus, the diagram is
![]() |
commutative. So, ϕ is natural in (P,C,ι).
Now we give the dual of Theorem 3.6.
Theorem 3.14. The forgetful functor θ:GCM→GRP is co-fibred.
Let P be a group and CP be a free group generated by C×P with the relation
(c,p)(c,p′)=(c,pp′) |
for all c∈C and p,p′∈P. Thus, C acts on CP by
c′(c,p)=(c′c,p) |
for c′∈C and (c,p)∈CP.
Proposition 3.15. Let (P,G,η) be a generalized crossed module and ν:G→C be a group morphism. If CP is a free group, then we get the following commutative diagram:
![]() |
Define η′:CP→C by νη, that is η′(c,p)=c⋅νη(p) for all (c,p)∈CP. Then, we get
η′(c′(c,p))=η′(c′c,p)=(c′c)⋅νη(p)=c′⋅(c⋅νη(p))=c′⋅ν′(c,p) |
for all c′∈C and (c,p)∈CP. Thus, η′ is the free pre-generalized crossed module generated by P.
Proposition 3.16. Let (P,G,η) be a generalized crossed module and let ν:G→C be a group morphism. Then, the induced generalized crossed module ν⋆(P) is generated, as a group, by the set C×P, with the following relations,
i) (c,p)(c,p′)=(c,pp′)ii) (c,gp)=(cν(g),p)iii) (c,p)⋅(c′p′)=(c⋅νη(p)⋅c′,p′) |
for all (c,p),(c′,p′)∈CP and g∈G.
The action of C on ν⋆(P) defined by c(c′,p)=(cc′,p) for all c′∈C and (c,p)∈CP. Thus,
η⋆:ν⋆(P)→C |
is given by η⋆(c,p)=c⋅νη(p), is a generalized crossed module, and the morphism
(ν′,ν):(P,G,η)→(ν⋆(P),C,η⋆) |
is a generalized crossed module morphism. Define ν′(p)=(1,p) for all p∈P and consider the diagram below:
![]() |
ν′(gp)=(1,gp)=(1ν(g),p)=(ν(g),p)=ν(g)(1,p)=ν(g)ν′(p) |
and
η⋆ν′(p)=η⋆(1,p)=νη(p) |
for all g∈G and p,p′∈P.
Let (D,C,η1) be any generalized crossed module and (α,ν):(P,G,η)→(D,C,η1) be any generalized crossed module morphism. Then, there is a unique generalized crossed module morphism (α⋆,idC):(ν⋆(P),C,η⋆)→(D,C,η1) such that the diagram
![]() |
commutes, i.e., (α⋆,idC)(ν′,ν)=(α,ν). Define α⋆(c,p)=c⋅α(p) for all (c,p)∈ν⋆(P). Then, (α⋆,idC) is a generalized crossed module morphism, since
α⋆(c′(c,p))=α⋆((c′c,p))=(c′c)⋅α(p)=c′⋅(c⋅α(p))=c′⋅α⋆(c,p)=idC(c′)(α⋆(c,p)) |
and
α⋆ν′(p)=α⋆(1,p)=1⋅α(p)=α(p) |
for all (c,p)∈ν⋆(P) and c′∈C. Moreover,
α⋆ν′(p)=α⋆(1,p)=α(p) |
for all p∈P.
Let (α′⋆,idC):(ν⋆(P),C,η⋆)→(D,C,η1) be any generalized crossed module morphism with ρ(α′⋆,idC)=idC and (ν′,ν)(α′⋆,idC)=(α,ν). For all (c,p)∈ν⋆(P),
α⋆(c,p)=c⋅α(p)=c⋅α′⋆ν′(p)=c⋅α′⋆(1,p)=idC(c)α′⋆(1,p)=α′⋆(c(1,p))=α′⋆(c,p). |
Then, (α′⋆,idC) is unique.
Thus, we get a cocartesian morphism (ν′,ν):(P,G,η)→(ν⋆(P),C,η⋆), for group morphism ν:G→C and generalized crossed module (P,G,η).
Corollary 3.17. In the category of generalized crossed module, (ν⋆(P),C,η⋆) is called induced generalized crossed module with the following diagram:
![]() |
Corollary 3.18. An induced generalized crossed module (ν⋆(P),C,η⋆) for the group morphism ν:G→C gives a functor
ν⋆:GCM/G→GCM/C, |
which is the left adjoint functor of
ν⋆:GCM/C→GCM/G. |
Proposition 3.19. Let ν1:G→C and ν2:S→G be two group morphisms. Then, (ν1ν2)⋆ and ν2⋆ν1⋆ are naturally isomorphic.
Proposition 3.20. Let θ:GCM→GRP be a co-fibred, υ:G→C be a group morphism and a functor ν⋆:GCM/G→GCM/C is chosen. Then, there is a bijection
GCMυ((P,G,η),(D,C,η1))≅GCM/C((ν⋆(P),C,η⋆),(D,C,η1)), |
which is natural in (P,G,η)∈GCM/G, (D,C,η1)∈GCM/C where GCMυ((P,G,η),(D,C,η1)) consists of those morphisms f∈GCMυ((P,G,η),(D,C,η1)) with θ(f)=υ.
We deduce the following immediately from these discussions.
Corollary 3.21. The category of generalized crossed module fibred and co-fibred over GRP, by the forgetful functor θ:GCM→GRP.
Proof. For any group morphism υ:G→C, there is an adjoint functor pair (υ⋆,υ⋆) as previously stated in Corollary 3.18. That is, a bijection
Φ:GCM/C((υ⋆(P),C,η⋆),(D,C,η1))→GCM/G((P,G,η),(υ⋆(D),G,η1⋆)) |
exists and is natural in (P,G,η)∈GCM/G, (D,C,η1)∈GCM/C. It is clear that Φ(α⋆)=α⋆ and Φ−1(α⋆)=α⋆. See diagram below:
![]() |
Yavari and Salemkar [15] defined the generalized crossed module on a group morphism ∂:P→C with arbitrary actions of C on C and P on P, instead of the usual conjugation actions. Thus, they generalized the concept of crossed modules. The category of generalized crossed modules provides a rich framework for studying various categorical structures and properties. In this paper, we extend well-known results from crossed modules to generalized crossed modules. It is shown that the forgetful functor θ:GCM→GRP is both fibred and co-fibred. Moreover, a pair of adjoint functors (ν⋆,ν⋆), where ν⋆:GCM/C→GCM/G and ν⋆:GCM/G→GCM/C, is obtained for the group morphism ν:G→C.
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
[1] |
A. Aytekin, K. Emir, Colimits of crossed modules in modified categories of interest, Electron. Res. Arch., 28 (2020), 1227–1238. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/era.2020067 doi: 10.3934/era.2020067
![]() |
[2] |
A. Aytekin, (Co) Limits of Hom-Lie crossed module, Turk. J. Math., 45 (2021), 2140–2153. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-2106-43 doi: 10.3906/mat-2106-43
![]() |
[3] | R. Brown, Topology and groupoids, Carolina: Booksurge LLC, 2006. |
[4] |
R. Brown, P. J. Higgins, On the connection between the second relative homotopy groups of some related spaces, P. Lond. Math. Soc., 3 (1978), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-36.2.193 doi: 10.1112/plms/s3-36.2.193
![]() |
[5] |
R. Brown, R. Sivera, Algebraic colimit calculations in homotopy theory using fibred and cofibred categories, arXiv, 22 (2009), 222–251. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0809.4192 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0809.4192
![]() |
[6] |
J. M. Casas, M. Ladra, Colimits in the crossed modules category in Lie algebras, Georgian Math. J., 7 (2000), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1515/GMJ.2000.461 doi: 10.1515/GMJ.2000.461
![]() |
[7] |
U. Ege Arslan, İ. İ. Akça, G. Onarlı Irmak, O. Avcıoğlu, Fibrations of 2-crossed modules, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 5293–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5321 doi: 10.1002/mma.5321
![]() |
[8] |
K. Emir, S. Çetin, Limits in modified categories of interest, arXiv, 43 (2017), 2617–2634. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.04877 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1805.04877
![]() |
[9] | J. W. Gray, Fibred and cofibred categories, In: Proceedings of the conference on categorical algebra, Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. |
[10] | A. Grothendieck, Catégories fibrées et descente, Seminaire de géométrie algébrique de l'Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, Paris, 1961. |
[11] |
Ö. Gürmen Alansal, U. Ege Arslan, Crossed modules bifibred over k-Algebras, Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 42 (2021), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.727906 doi: 10.17776/csj.727906
![]() |
[12] |
E. Soylu Yilmaz, (Co)Limit calculations in the category of 2-crossed R-modules, Turk. J. Math., 46 (2022), 2902–2915. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0098.3308 doi: 10.55730/1300-0098.3308
![]() |
[13] | J. H. C. Whitehead, Combinatorial homotopy Ⅰ, Homotopy Theory, 1962, 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-009871-5.50012-X |
[14] | J. H. C. Whitehead, Combinatorial homotopy Ⅱ, Homotopy Theory, 1962,119–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-009871-5.50013-1 |
[15] |
M. Yavari, A. Salemkar, The category of generalized crossed modules, Categ. Gen. Algebr. Struct. Appl., 10 (2019), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.29252/CGASA.10.1.157 doi: 10.29252/CGASA.10.1.157
![]() |