Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Primitive decompositions of idempotents of the group algebras of dihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups

  • Received: 04 August 2024 Revised: 03 September 2024 Accepted: 05 September 2024 Published: 29 September 2024
  • MSC : 20C05, 20C15

  • In this paper, we introduce a method for computing the primitive decomposition of idempotents in any semisimple finite group algebra, utilizing its matrix representations and Wedderburn decomposition. Particularly, we use this method to calculate the examples of the dihedral group algebras C[D2n] and generalized quaternion group algebras C[Q4m]. Inspired by the orthogonality relations of the character tables of these two families of groups, we obtain two sets of trigonometric identities. Furthermore, a group algebra isomorphism between C[D8] and C[Q8] is described, under which the two complete sets of primitive orthogonal idempotents of these group algebras correspond bijectively.

    Citation: Lilan Dai, Yunnan Li. Primitive decompositions of idempotents of the group algebras of dihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28150-28169. doi: 10.3934/math.20241365

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yanyan Gao, Yangjiang Wei . Group codes over symmetric groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 19842-19856. doi: 10.3934/math.20231011
    [2] Chunqiang Cui, Jin Chen, Shixun Lin . Metric and strong metric dimension in TI-power graphs of finite groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 705-720. doi: 10.3934/math.2025032
    [3] Yunpeng Bai, Yuanlin Li, Jiangtao Peng . Unit groups of finite group algebras of Abelian groups of order 17 to 20. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7305-7317. doi: 10.3934/math.2021428
    [4] Huani Li, Ruiqin Fu, Xuanlong Ma . Forbidden subgraphs in reduced power graphs of finite groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5410-5420. doi: 10.3934/math.2021319
    [5] Yingyu Luo, Yu Wang . Supercommuting maps on unital algebras with idempotents. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24636-24653. doi: 10.3934/math.20241200
    [6] Guoqing Wang . A generalization of Kruyswijk-Olson theorem on Davenport constant in commutative semigroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2992-3001. doi: 10.3934/math.2020193
    [7] Yongli Zhang, Jiaxin Shen . Flag-transitive non-symmetric 2-designs with λ prime and exceptional groups of Lie type. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25636-25645. doi: 10.3934/math.20241252
    [8] Hatice Gülsün Akay . (Co-)fibration of generalized crossed modules. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32782-32796. doi: 10.3934/math.20241568
    [9] Xiaofei Cao, Yuyue Huang, Xue Hua, Tingyu Zhao, Sanzhang Xu . Matrix inverses along the core parts of three matrix decompositions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30194-30208. doi: 10.3934/math.20231543
    [10] Hui Yan, Hongxing Wang, Kezheng Zuo, Yang Chen . Further characterizations of the weak group inverse of matrices and the weak group matrix. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9322-9341. doi: 10.3934/math.2021542
  • In this paper, we introduce a method for computing the primitive decomposition of idempotents in any semisimple finite group algebra, utilizing its matrix representations and Wedderburn decomposition. Particularly, we use this method to calculate the examples of the dihedral group algebras C[D2n] and generalized quaternion group algebras C[Q4m]. Inspired by the orthogonality relations of the character tables of these two families of groups, we obtain two sets of trigonometric identities. Furthermore, a group algebra isomorphism between C[D8] and C[Q8] is described, under which the two complete sets of primitive orthogonal idempotents of these group algebras correspond bijectively.



    Given any finite group G and field F, denote as F[G] the group ring of G over F. When charF|G|, F[G] is semisimple by Maschke's theorem. Then, by Wedderburn's structure theorem, F[G] is isomorphic to a direct sum of matrix algebras. The Wedderburn decomposition becomes a key tool for studying group algebra problems [1,2,3,4,5]. For example, Macedo Ferreira et al. dealt with the Wedderburn b-decomposition for alternative baric algebras [1]. Jespers et al. reduced the number of generators for a subgroup of finite indexes in a certain kind of unit group U(Z[G]) by having a closer look at the Wedderburn decomposition of Q[G] [3]. Olivieri et al. studied the automorphism group Aut(Q[G]) of the rational group algebra Q[G] of a finite metacyclic group G by describing the simple components of the Wedderburn decomposition of Q[G] [5].

    As the main objects discussed throughout our paper, dihedral groups D2n describe 2-dimensional objects that have rotational and reflective symmetry, such as regular polygons, and generalized quaternion groups Q4m generalize the quaternion group Q8. In physics, the theory of rigid motion analysis and the practical problem of motion control are all related to quaternions, and many applications in physics use the concept and extension of quaternions.

    The Wedderburn decomposition of group algebras of these two families of groups has already attracted much attention. For instance, Giraldo Vergara and Brochero Martínez gave an elementary proof of the Wedderburn decomposition of rational quaternion and dihedral group algebras [6]. Giraldo Vergara used the classification of groups of order 32 and also computed the Wedderburn decomposition of their rational group algebras in order to classify the rational group algebras of dimension 32 [7]. Bakshi et al. calculated a complete set of primitive central idempotents and the Wedderburn decomposition of the rational group algebra of a finite metabelian group [8]. Brochero Martínez showed explicitly the primitive central idempotents of Fq[D2n] and an isomorphism between the group algebra Fq[D2n] and its Wedderburn decomposition when every prime factor of n divides q1 [9]. Gao and Yue focused on the algebraic structure of the generalized quaternion group algebras Fq[Q4m] over finite field Fq [10].

    Additionally, the study of primitive orthogonal idempotents of group algebras has ignited much interest. For many classes of groups, such as nilpotent, monomial, and supersolvable groups, a complete description of the idempotents of their group algebras was obtained by Berman (see e.g., [11]). For example, Berman, in 1995, constructed the minimal central idempotents of the group ring R(G,F) in terms of the central idempotents of R(H,F) when G is an abelian extension of a group H. Furthermore, the complete system of minimal idempotents of R(G,F) was given in terms of such a system for R(H,F) when G/H is cyclic [12]. After that, he characterized a complete system of primitive orthogonal idempotents of F[G] for any solvable group G of class M1 by calculating linear characters of its subgroups, where F is any field of characteristic prime to |G| containing a primitive root of unity of |G| [13].

    After nearly 40 years, a method somewhat different but closely related to Berman's in calculating primitive orthogonal idempotents of these group algebras was proposed. In 2004, Olivieri et al. gave a character-free method to describe the primitive central idempotents of Q[G] when G is a monomial group [14]. Later, an explicit and character-free construction of a complete set of primitive orthogonal idempotents of Q[G] was provided in [15] for any finite nilpotent group G (see also [16] for the case over finite fields) and in [17] for any finite strongly monomial group G such that there exists a complete and non-redundant set of strong Shoda pairs with trivial twistings. See also [18, Chapter 13] for an overall introduction to this topic.

    In this paper, after calculating the primitive central idempotents of C[D2n] and C[Q4m] via irreducible characters, we further consider their primitive decompositions of idempotents. Note that dihedral groups D2n and generalized quaternion groups Q4m are not only supersolvable groups but also strongly monomial groups. Their primitive decompositions of idempotents can certainly be obtained using Berman's method from [13]. Also, a complete set of primitive orthogonal idempotents for any dihedral group can be constructed via strong Shoda pairs, though this is questionable for all generalized quaternion groups [17, § 4]. In contrast, here, the computation of primitive decompositions of idempotents mainly depends on matrix representations of groups and Wedderburn decompositions of group algebras (Lemma 1). Such an approach is theoretically applicable to any semisimple group algebra over an arbitrary field whenever a complete set of its non-equivalent irreducible matrix representations have been obtained. In particular, it is directly available to examples of dihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups.

    On the other hand, given two primitive decompositions of idempotents of two isomorphic group algebras, it seems challenging to obtain a specific algebra isomorphism between them that makes the two complete sets of primitive orthogonal idempotents correspond to each other. Here, we solve one small but nontrivial case by establishing an explicit isomorphism between C[D8] and C[Q8], which respects the list of primitive orthogonal idempotents we previously found. Indeed, there are plenty of results for the group algebras of D8 and Q8. For example, Bagiński studied group algebras of 2-groups of maximal class over fields of characteristic 2, showing that F2[D8] and F2[Q8] are not isomorphic as rings [19]. Coleman discussed group rings over the complex and real number fields and over the ring of integers in [20], where it was demonstrated that C[Q8]C[D8], but R[Q8]R[D8] and Z[Q8]Z[D8]. As R is a field extension of Q, it also implies that Q[Q8]Q[D8]. Tambara and Yamagami pointed out that Q8 and D8 have the same representation ring, but non-isomorphic representation categories as tensor categories [21].

    Here is the layout of the paper. In Sections 2 and 3, the primitive central idempotents of dihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups are calculated by their irreducible characters. Furthermore, primitive decompositions of idempotents corresponding to their two-dimensional representations are analyzed. In Section 4, two sets of general trigonometric identities reflecting the orthogonality relations of irreducible characters of dihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups are given. In Section 5, a group algebra isomorphism between C[Q8] and C[D8] is described, which also provides a correspondence between their primitive orthogonal idempotents previously established.

    Let D2n be the dihedral group of order 2n, i.e.,

    D2n={r,s|rn=s2=1,srs=r1}.

    When n is an odd number, namely n=2m+1, D2n has the following conjugacy classes:

    [1]={1},[ri]={r±i|1im},[s]={s,rs,,rn1s}.

    When n is an even number, namely n=2m, D2n has the following conjugacy classes:

    [1]={1},[rm]={rm},[ri]={r±i|1im1},[s]={r2ks|0km1},[rs]={r2k+1s|0km1}.

    (i) n=2m+1. We look at the one-dimensional representations first. Note that D2n/rs, which is abelian, hence the derived subgroup D2nr. Clearly, s1r1sr=r2D2n, thus we have D2nr2. Note that r2m=r1r2, therefore r2=r. Then, D2n=r. As a result, D2n has two one-dimensional representations and D2n/rC2, where C2 is the cyclic group of order 2.

    Next, we introduce these two-dimensional irreducible representations of D2n from its natural geometric description [22, Part Ⅰ, 5.3]. We can set up a rectangular coordinate system, where the origin is the center of a regular n-sided polygon, and the angular bisector in the first and third quadrants is one of the symmetry axes of the regular n-sided polygon. Since D2n is a permutation group of regular n-sided polygons, the matrices of r, s with respect to the standard basis can be given. Then, we have the following natural representations:

    ρk(r)=(cos2kπnsin2kπnsin2kπncos2kπn),ρk(s)=(0110),1km, (2.1)

    which are m mutually non-equivalent two-dimensional irreducible representations of D2n. Thus, when n is an odd number, we set θ=2πn, and list the character table of D2n (Table 1):

    Table 1.  Irreducible characters of D2n (n=2m+1).
    1 s r r2 r3 rm1 rm
    (1) (n) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
    χ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χ2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χρ1 2 0 2cosθ 2cos2θ 2cos3θ 2cos(m1)θ 2cosmθ
    χρm 2 0 2cosmθ 2cos2mθ 2cos3mθ 2cos(m1)mθ 2cosm2θ

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    (ⅱ) n=2m. Similarly, r2 is a normal subgroup of D2n as sr2s1=r2r2, and |D2n/r2|=4, then D2n/r2 is abelian, and thus D2nr2. Clearly, r2=s1r1srD2n, we also have D2nr2, so D2n=r2. As a result, D2n has four one-dimensional representations and D2n/r2C2×C2.

    If n is an even number, we can also obtain m1 pairwise non-equivalent two-dimensional irreducible representations of D2n:

    ρk(r)=(cos2kπnsin2kπnsin2kπncos2kπn),ρk(s)=(0110),1km1. (2.2)

    Thus, when n is an even number, we set θ=2πn, and list the character table of D2n (Table 2):

    Table 2.  Irreducible characters of D2n (n=2m).
    1 s sr r r2 rm1 rm
    (1) (m) (m) (2) (2) (2) (1)
    χ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χ2 1 1 1 1 1 (1)m1 (1)m
    χ3 1 1 1 1 1 (1)m1 (1)m
    χ4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χρ1 2 0 0 2cosθ 2cos2θ 2cos(m1)θ 2
    χρm1 2 0 0 2cos(m1)θ 2cos2(m1)θ 2cos(m1)2θ 2(1)m1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Theorem 2.1. (Wedderburn structure theorem). Let F be any field such that charF|G|. Then

    F[G]φMn1(D1)Mns(Ds)

    as algebras, where Dk is a division F-algebra, and each matrix algebra Mnk(Dk) uniquely determines an irreducible representation ρk of G up to equivalence, and nk is equal to its dimension over Dk for k=1,,s.

    According to Theorem 2.1, we obtain the following useful lemma.

    Lemma 2.1. For any semisimple finite group algebra F[G], let eρk be the primitive central idempotent of F[G] corresponding to ρk. The group homomorphism ρk:GGL(nk,Dk) can be linearly extended to the following algebra homomorphism

    F[G]φMn1(D1)Mns(Ds)pkMnk(Dk),

    which is an isomorphism when restricted on F[G]eρk. In particular, the preimages of the matrix units E11,,Enk,nk of Mnk(Dk) under this isomorphism provide a primitive decomposition of eρk in F[G]. Here, we denote pk the natural projection.

    Also, it is well-known that all primitive central idempotents of the semisimple group algebra F[G] of a finite group G can be obtained by its character table (see e.g., [23, Theorem 3.6.2]), namely

    eχ=1|G|gGχ(1)χ(g1)g,χIrr(G). (2.3)

    Applying Eq (2.3) to Tables 1 and 2 of dihedral group D2n, we immediately have

    Proposition 2.1. Let D2n be the dihedral group of order 2n. The primitive central idempotents corresponding to the one-dimensional irreducible representations of D2n are as follows.

    (i) When n is an odd number, namely n=2m+1,

    e1=14m+2(2m+1l=1rl+2m+1l=1rls),e2=14m+2(2m+1l=1rl2m+1l=1rls).

    (ii) When n is an even number, namely n=2m,

    e1=14m(2ml=1rl+2ml=1rls),e2=14m[1+2ml=1(1)lrls+m1l=1(1)l(rl+rl)+(1)mrm],e3=14m[1+2ml=1(1)l+1rls+m1l=1(1)l(rl+rl)+(1)mrm],e4=14m(2ml=1rl2ml=1rls).

    In order to obtain a primitive decomposition of idempotents of C[D2n], we mainly need to deal with its primitive idempotents corresponding to two-dimensional irreducible representations.

    Theorem 2.2. Let D2n be the dihedral group of order 2n. We have the following primitive decomposition eρk=eρk+eρk of the primitive central idempotent eρk corresponding to the two-dimensional irreducible representation (C2,ρk) of D2n defined in Eqs (2.1) and (2.2) for k=1,,(n1)/2.

    (i) When n is an odd number, namely n=2m+1,

    eρk=22m+12m+1l=1coslkθrl,eρk=12m+1(1+2ml=1coslkθrl+2ml=1sinlkθrls),eρk=12m+1(1+2ml=1coslkθrl2ml=1sinlkθrls),

    with θ=2πn and 1km;

    (ii) When n is an even number, namely n=2m,

    eρk=1m2ml=1coslkθrl,eρk=12m(1+2m1l=1coslkθrl+2m1l=1sinlkθrls),eρk=12m(1+2m1l=1coslkθrl2m1l=1sinlkθrls),

    with θ=2πn and 1km1.

    Proof. Under the group homomorphism ρk:D2nGL(2,C),k=1,,(n1)/2, we have

    r(cos2kπnsin2kπnsin2kπncos2kπn),s(0110),1(1001).

    Therefore,

    rs(sin2kπncos2kπncos2kπnsin2kπn),cos2kπnsrs(sin2kπn00sin2kπn).

    Thus,

    sin2kπn1(cos2kπnsrs)(0002sin2kπn),
    sin2kπn1+(cos2kπnsrs)(2sin2kπn000).

    Clearly, 0<2kπn<π, we have

    12sin2kπn(sin2kπn1cos2kπns+rs)(0001),
    12sin2kπn(sin2kπn1+cos2kπnsrs)(1000).

    By Lemma 2.1, we know that F[G]eρkMnk(F) as algebras, and thus

    eρk=eρk12sin2kπn(sin2kπn1cos2kπns+rs)=12eρk(1cotkθs+csckθrs),eρk=12eρk(1+cotkθscsckθrs).

    We can verify that

    eρk=eρk+eρk,eρkeρk=0,eρkeρk=eρk,eρkeρk=eρk.

    (ⅰ) If n=2m+1, the primitive central idempotents eρk are given as follows by Eq (2.3) and the character table of D2n:

    eρk=22m+12m+1l=1coslkθrl,1km.

    Thus,

    eρk=12m+1(1+2ml=1coslkθrl+2ml=1sinlkθrls),1km.

    Similarly,

    eρk=12m+1(1+2ml=1coslkθrl2ml=1sinlkθrls),1km.

    (ⅱ) If n=2m, the primitive central idempotents of D2n are given by

    eρk=1m2ml=1coslkθrl,1km1.

    Therefore,

    eρk=12m(1+2m1l=1coslkθrl+2m1l=1sinlkθrls),1km1.

    Similarly,

    eρk=12m(1+2m1l=1coslkθrl2m1l=1sinlkθrls),1km1.

    Example 2.1. Let D8 be a dihedral group with order 8. Then, m=2, k=1,n=4, there is a primitive decomposition of idempotents as follows.

    eρ1=12(1r2),eρ1=14(1r2+rsr3s),eρ1=14(1r2rs+r3s).

    Let Q4m be the generalized quaternion group of order 4m, i.e.,

    Q4m={a,b|a2m=1,am=b2,b1ab=a1}.

    Q4m has the following conjugacy classes:

    [1]={1},[am]={am},[ar]={a±r|1rm1},[b]={a2kb|0km1},[ab]={a2k1b|0km1}.

    The derived subgroup Q4m=a2. Indeed, a2 is a normal subgroup of Q4m, and |Q4m/a2|=4, hence Q4m/a2 is abelian and a2Q4m. Clearly, b1a1b=a, thus b1a1ba=a2Q4m, as a2Q4m.

    As |Q4m/a2|=4, Q4m/a2C4 or Q4m/a2C2×C2, and Q4m has four irreducible one-dimensional representations. Also, it has m1 mutually non-equivalent two-dimensional irreducible representations [24, Exs. 17.6, 18.3, 23.5]. We recall these two-dimensional irreducible representations of Q4m as follows.

    Let ε:=eπi/mC with i:=1. For each k with 1km1, denote matrices

    Ak=(εk00εk),Bk=(01(1)k0),

    which satisfy the following relations:

    A2mk=I,Amk=B2k,B1kAkBk=A1k.

    Hence, it follows that

    ρk:Q4mGL(2,C) (3.1)

    defined by

    aAk,bBk

    is a group homomorphism, and we obtain a representation (C2,ρk) of Q4m.

    (ⅰ) When m is an odd number, as 2m, we know that b2=amQ4m, hence the order of b cannot be 2. Then, b is of order 4, so Q4m/a2C4. We set ϑ=πm, and list the character table of Q4m (Table 3):

    Table 3.  Irreducible characters of Q4m (2m).
    1 a a2 am1 am b ab
    (1) (2) (2) (2) (1) (m) (m)
    χ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χ2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χ3 1 1 1 (1)m1 1 i i
    χ4 1 1 1 (1)m1 1 i i
    χρ1 2 2cosϑ 2cos2ϑ 2cos(m1)ϑ 2 0 0
    χρm1 2 2cos(m1)ϑ 2cos2(m1)ϑ 2cos(m1)2ϑ 2(1)m1 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    (ⅱ) When m is an even number, as 2|m, we have b2=amQ4m. Therefore, Q4m/a2C2×C2. We set ϑ=πm, and list the character table of Q4m (Table 4):

    Table 4.  Irreducible characters of Q4m (2|m).
    1 a a2 am1 am b ab
    (1) (2) (2) (2) (1) (m) (m)
    χ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χ2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    χ3 1 1 1 (1)m1 1 1 1
    χ4 1 1 1 (1)m1 1 1 1
    χρ1 2 2cosϑ 2cos2ϑ 2cos(m1)ϑ 2 0 0
    χρm1 2 2cos(m1)ϑ 2cos2(m1)ϑ 2cos(m1)2ϑ 2(1)m1 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    First applying Eq (2.3) to Tables 3 and 4 of generalized quaternion group Q4m, we have

    Proposition 3.1. Let Q4m be the generalized quaternion group of order 4m. The primitive central idempotents corresponding to the one-dimensional irreducible representations of Q4m are as follows.

    (i) When m is an odd number,

    e1=14m(2ml=1al+2ml=1alb),e2=14m(2ml=1al2ml=1alb),e3=14m[1+i2ml=1(1)lalb+m1l=1(1)l(al+al)am],e4=14m[1+i2ml=1(1)l+1alb+m1l=1(1)l(al+al)am].

    (ii) When m is an even number,

    e1=14m(2ml=1al+2ml=1alb),e2=14m(2ml=1al2ml=1alb),e3=14m[1+2ml=1(1)lalb+m1l=1(1)l(al+al)+am],e4=14m[1+2ml=1(1)l+1alb+m1l=1(1)l(al+al)+am].

    For other primitive idempotents corresponding to two-dimensional irreducible representations of Q4m, we have

    Theorem 3.1. Let Q4m be the generalized quaternion group of order 4m. Then, we have the following primitive decomposition eρk=eρk+eρk of the primitive central idempotent eρk corresponding to the two-dimensional irreducible representation (C2,ρk) of Q4m defined in Eq (3.1) for k=1,,m1.

    (i) When k is an odd number,

    eρk=1m2ml=1coslkϑal,eρk=12misinkϑ2ml=1(εkam+lam+l1)coslkϑ,eρk=12misinkϑ2ml=1(am+l1εkam+l)coslkϑ,

    with ϑ=πm and 1km1;

    (ii) When k is an even number,

    eρk=1m2ml=1coslkϑal,eρk=12misinkϑ2ml=1(εkam+lam+l1)coslkϑ,eρk=12misinkϑ2ml=1(am+l1εkam+l)coslkϑ,

    with ϑ=πm and 1km1.

    Proof. (ⅰ) When k is an odd number, under the group homomorphism ρk:Q4mGL(2,C), we have

    a(εk00εk),b(0110).

    Then,

    ab(0εkεk0),εkb(0εkεk0),εkb(0εkεk0).

    Therefore,

    εkbab(00εkεk0),εkbab(0εkεk00).

    As εkεk0, it implies that

    1εkεk(εkbab)(0010),1εkεk(εkbab)(0100).

    As a result, we have

    bεkεk(εkbab)(0001),bεkεk(εkbab)(1000).

    Now, one can compute the primitive central idempotents eρk via the character table, and then get their desired primitive decompositions by the similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.2.

    (ⅱ) When k is an even number, by similar arguments as in the case when k is an odd number.

    Example 3.1. Let Q8 be a generalized quaternion group of order 8, then k=1, m=2. Therefore,

    eρ1=12(1a2),eρ1=14i(a3+ia2ai1),eρ1=14i(a3+ia2+ai1).

    Here, we find the following two sets of trigonometric identities covering the orthogonality relations in the character tables of dihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups.

    Proposition 4.1. For any n1 and 1kn1, and any angle θ that is not an integer multiple of 2π, we have

    (i) n1r=0(1)rcosrkπn={1,n+kodd,0,n+keven;

    (ii) nr=1cosrθ=sin(θ2+nθ)2sinθ212.

    Proof. (ⅰ) Note that

    cos(rkπn±kπ2n)=cosrkπncoskπ2nsinrkπnsinkπ2n

    imply the following product-to-sum identity

    cosrkπncoskπ2n=12[cos(2r+1)kπ2n+cos(2r1)kπ2n].

    As a result, we have

    n1r=0(1)rcosrkπncoskπ2n=coskπ2n+n1r=1(1)r12[cos(2r+1)kπ2n+cos(2r1)kπ2n]=coskπ2n+12n1r=1(1)rcos(2r+1)kπ2n+12n2r=0(1)r+1cos(2r+1)kπ2n=coskπ2n+12(1)n1cos(2n1)kπ2n12coskπ2n=12coskπ2n+12(1)n1cos(kπkπ2n)=12[1+(1)n+k1]coskπ2n.

    Since coskπ2n0 for any 1kn1, we see that

    n1r=0(1)rcosrkπn=12[1+(1)n+k1]={1,n+k odd,0,n+k even.

    (ⅱ) Similarly by product-to-sum identities, we see that

    2sinθ2nr=1cosrθ=2sinθ2cosθ++2sinθ2cosnθ=sin3θ2sinθ2++sin(nθ+θ2)sin(nθθ2)=sin(nθ+θ2)sinθ2.

    Since θ is not an integer multiple of 2π, we obtain that

    nr=1cosrθ=sin(θ2+nθ)2sinθ212.

    Next, we clarify how these identities are connected to the character tables of dihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups.

    Example 4.1. Using the first orthogonality relation in the character tables of D2n in Table 1 when n=2m+1 and θ=2π2m+1, we have

    χ1,χρk=14m+2[2+4mr=1coskrθ]=0,1km.

    The resulting identities

    mr=1coskrθ=12,1km,

    and the identities due to χ1,χρk=0 in Table 2 are all special cases of Prop. 4.1 (ii). Additionally,

    χρa,χρb=14m+2[4+8mr=1cosarθcosbrθ]=0,1a,bm,ab.

    That is,

    mr=1cosarθcosbrθ=12,

    which can also be deduced by Prop. 4.1 (ii).

    Example 4.2. Using the first orthogonality relation in the character tables of Q4m in Tables 3 and 4, when m is an odd number,

    χ3,χρk=14m[2+4m1r=1(1)rcoskrπm+2(1)k+1]=0,1km1.

    When m is an even number,

    χ3,χρk=14m[2+4m1r=1(1)rcoskrπm+2(1)k]=0,1km1.

    That means

    m1r=1(1)rcoskrπm={0,m+k odd,1,m+k even,

    equivalent to Prop 4.1 (i). The identities by χ3,χρk=0 in Table 2 are the same. Also, we have

    χρa,χρb=14m[4+8m1r=1cosarπmcosbrπm+4(1)a+b]=0,1a,bm1,ab.

    That is,

    m1r=1cosarπmcosbrπm={0,a+b odd,1,a+b even,

    which can also be deduced by Prop. 4.1 (ii).

    In this section, we would like to specifically describe a group algebra isomorphism between C[Q8] and C[D8], offering a correspondence between two complete sets of their primitive orthogonal idempotents given in Prop. 2.1, Theorem 2.2 and Prop. 3.1, Theorem 3.1.

    Theorem 5.1. There is an algebra isomorphism

    ψ:C[Q8]C[D8]

    mapping any α=x01+x1a2+x2a+x3a3+x4b+x5a2b+x6ab+x7a3b to

    ψ(α)=x01+x7r+x1r2+x6r3+12(x2+x3ix4+ix5)s+12(ix2+ix3+x4+x5)rs+12(x2+x3+ix4ix5)r2s+12(ix2ix3+x4+x5)r3s,

    with i:=1 and xiC.

    Proof. We note that the generalized quaternion group Q4m and the dihedral group D2n have the same character table when n=2m and 2|m. In particular, the smallest case Q8 and D8 have the same values in the first column, and consequently C[Q8]C[D8] as algebras by Lemma 2.1.

    The primitive central idempotents corresponding to the two-dimensional irreducible representations of C[Q8] and C[D8] are

    12(1a2),12(1r2).

    Under any algebra isomorphism from C[Q8] to C[D8], we must have

    11,a2r2.

    On the other hand, by Prop. 3.1, all primitive central idempotents corresponding to the four one-dimensional representations of C[Q8] are as follows:

    e1=18(1+a2+a+a3+b+a2b+ab+a3b),
    e2=18(1+a2+a+a3ba2baba3b),
    e3=18(1+a2aa3+b+a2baba3b),
    e4=18(1+a2aa3ba2b+ab+a3b).

    That is,

    (e1e2e3e4)=18(1111111111111111)(1+a2a+a3b+a2bab+a3b).

    By Prop. 2.1, all primitive central idempotents corresponding to the four one-dimensional representations of C[D8] are as follows:

    e1=18(1+r+r2+r3+s+rs+r2s+r3s),
    e2=18(1r+r2r3+srs+r2sr3s),
    e3=18(1r+r2r3s+rsr2s+r3s),
    e4=18(1+r+r2+r3srsr2sr3s).

    Namely,

    (e1e2e3e4)=18(1111111111111111)(1+r2s+r2srs+r3sr+r3).

    Therefore, we can assume that our desired algebra isomorphism ψ:C[Q8]C[D8] satisfies

    ab+a3br+r3,a+a3s+r2s,b+a2brs+r3s.

    Furthermore, since ψ(ξ1ξ2)=ψ(ξ1)ψ(ξ2) for any ξ1,ξ2C[Q8], the map ψ also satisfies:

    ψ(abab)=ψ(b2)=ψ(a2)=r2=ψ(ab)2,ψ(ab+a3b)=ψ(ab)(1+r2)=r+r3=r(1+r2).

    That is,

    {ψ(ab)2=r2,ψ(ab)r(1r2),

    as the principal ideal (1r2) is the annihilator of 1+r2. Similarly,

    {ψ(a)2=r2,ψ(a)s(1r2),{ψ(b)2=r2,ψ(b)rs(1r2).

    Therefore, we can set

    {ψ(ab)=r+(k11+k2r+k3rs+k4s)(1r2),ψ(a)=s+(k91+k10r+k11rs+k12s)(1r2),ψ(b)=rs+(k51+k6r+k7rs+k8s)(1r2),

    with k1,,k12C, and obtain the following system of equations,

    {k1k3=0,k1k4=0,4k1k2+2k1=0,2k21+2k23+2k242k222k2=0;k5k6=0,k5k8=0,4k5k7+2k5=0,2k25+2k27+2k282k26+1+2k7=0;k9k10=0,k9k11=0,4k9k12+2k9=0,2k29+2k211+2k2122k210+1+2x12=0.

    Note that there is more than one solution for this system of equations, and any one of these solutions must also satisfy:

    {ψ(a)ψ(b)=ψ(ab),ψ(b)ψ(ab)=ψ(a),ψ(ab)ψ(a)=ψ(b).

    However, these three additional equalities fail to hold simultaneously for any solution in which k1,k5, and k9 are not all zero. Instead, we find the solution below satisfying all these equations:

    k1=k3=k4=0,k2=1,k5=k6=0,k7=12,k8=i2,k9=k10=0,k11=i2,k12=12.

    That is,

    abr3,a12(r2s+sirs+ir3s),b12(rs+r3sis+ir2s).

    Then

    a3br,a2b12(rs+r3s+isir2s),a312(r2s+s+irsir3s).

    Now, we specifically verify that the stated linear map ψ:C[Q8]C[D8] is an algebra isomorphism as desired:

    ψ(a)2=14(r2s+sirs+ir3s)2=14(1+r2ir+ir3+r2+1ir3+irir3ir1+r2+ir+ir3+r21)=r2=ψ(a2);ψ(a)3=ψ(a2)ψ(a)=r212(r2s+sirs+ir3s)=12(r2s+s+irsir3s)=ψ(a3);ψ(a)4=ψ(a2)2=(r2)2=r4=1;ψ(a)ψ(b)=14(r2s+sirs+ir3s)(rs+r3sis+ir2s)=14(r+r3ir2+i1+r3+ri1+ir2i1ir2r+r3+ir2+i1+r3r)=r3=ψ(ab);ψ(a)2ψ(b)=ψ(a2)ψ(b)=r212(rs+r3sis+ir2s)=12(r3s+rsir2s+is)=ψ(a2b);ψ(a)3ψ(b)=ψ(a2)ψ(ab)=r2r3=r=ψ(a3b);ψ(b)2=14(rs+r3sis+ir2s)2=14(1+r2ir+ir3+r2+1ir3+irir3ir1+r2+ir+ir3+r21)=r2=ψ(a2);ψ(a)ψ(b)ψ(a)=ψ(ab)ψ(a)=r312(r2s+sirs+ir3s)=12(rs+r3sis+ir2s)=ψ(b).

    According to Prop. 2.1, Theorem 2.2 and Prop. 3.1, Theorem 3.1, we have two complete sets of primitive orthogonal idempotents of C[Q8] and C[D8], respectively. There are primitive idempotents e1,,e4 corresponding to one-dimensional irreducible representations of Q8, and Example 3.1 has calculated the primitive decomposition of idempotents that is given by ρ1 for the unique two-dimensional irreducible representation of Q8 up to equivalence.

    eρ1=12(1a2)=eρ1+eρ1,eρ1=14i(a3+ia2ai1),eρ1=14i(a3+ia2+ai1).

    There are primitive idempotents ˉe1,,ˉe4 corresponding to one-dimensional irreducible representations of D8, and we see by Example 2.1 that the unique two-dimensional irreducible representation ρ1 of D8 up to equivalence provides

    ˉeρ1=12(1r2)=ˉeρ1+ˉeρ1,ˉeρ1=14(1r2+rsr3s),ˉeρ1=14(1r2rs+r3s).

    Here, we use bar notation to distinguish the complete set of primitive orthogonal idempotents of C[Q8] from that of C[D8].

    The proof of Theorem 5.1 has shown that ψ(ei)=ˉei for 1i4. Now, we further check that

    ψ(eρ1)=ψ(14i(a3+ia2ai1))=14(1r2rs+r3s)=ˉeρ1,ψ(eρ1)=ψ(14i(a3+ia2+ai1))=14(1r2+rsr3s)=ˉeρ1.

    Question. In general, we wonder how to find algebra isomorphisms between C[Q4m] and C[D2n] when n=2m and 2|m, making a one-to-one correspondence between the two complete sets of their primitive orthogonal idempotents given in this paper.

    Overall, we obtain the formulas for the primitive decompositions of idempotents of the dihedral group algebras C[D2n] and generalized quaternion group algebras C[Q4m]. Then we present two sets of trigonometric identities by the orthogonality relations of the character tables of these two families of groups. Additionally, we explicitly describe a group algebra isomorphism between C[D8] and C[Q8].

    Lilan Dai: Writing-original draft and editing, conceptualization, software, methodology; Yunnan Li: Topic selection, writing-review and editing, funding acquisition, methodology, supervision. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    This work is supported by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515010357).

    We would like to thank professor Victor Bovdi for helpful comments.

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] B. L. Macedo Ferreira, R. Nascimento Ferreira, The Wedderburn b-decomposition for alternative baric algebras, Mitt. Math. Ges. Hamburg., 37 (2017), 13–25.
    [2] A. Herman, On the automorphism groups of rational group algebras of metacyclic groups, Comm. Algebra, 25 (1997), 2085–2097. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927879708825973 doi: 10.1080/00927879708825973
    [3] E. Jespers, G. Leal, Generators of large subgroups of the unit group of integral group rings, Manuscripta Math., 78 (1993), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02599315 doi: 10.1007/bf02599315
    [4] E. Jespers, Á. del Río, A structure theorem for the unit group of the integral group ring of some finite groups, J. Reine Angew. Math., 521 (2000), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.2000.032 doi: 10.1515/crll.2000.032
    [5] A. Olivieri, Á. del Río, J. J. Simón, The group of automorphisms of the rational group algebra of a finite metacyclic group, Comm. Algebra, 34 (2006), 3543–3567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927870600796136 doi: 10.1080/00927870600796136
    [6] C. R. Giraldo Vergara, F. E. Brochero Martínez, Wedderburn decomposition of some special rational group algebras, Lect. Mat., 23 (2002), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110372946-004 doi: 10.1515/9783110372946-004
    [7] C. R. Giraldo Vergara, Wedderburn decomposition of small rational group algebras, Groups, Rings and Group Rings, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., 248 (2006), 191–200.
    [8] G. K. Bakshi, R. S. Kulkarni, I. B. S. Passi, The rational group algebra of a finite group, J. Algebra Appl., 12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/s021949881250168x
    [9] F. E. Brochero Martínez, Structure of finite dihedral group algebra, Finite Fields Appl., 5 (2015), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ffa.2015.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ffa.2015.05.002
    [10] Y. Gao, Q. Yue, Idempotents of generalized quaternion group algebras and their applications, Discrete Math., 344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2021.112342
    [11] M. Isaacs, A. Lichtman, D. Passman, S. Sehgal, N. J. Sloane, H. Zassenhaus, Representation theory, group rings, and coding theory, American Mathematical Society, 1989.
    [12] S. D. Berman, Group algebras of abelian extensions of finite groups, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 102 (1955), 431–434.
    [13] S. D. Berman, Representations of finite groups over an arbitrary field and over rings of integers, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 30 (1966), 69–132.
    [14] A. Olivieri, Á. del Río, J. J. Simón, On monomial characters and central idempotents of rational group algebras, Comm. Algebra, 32 (2004), 1531–1550. https://doi.org/10.1081/agb-120028797 doi: 10.1081/agb-120028797
    [15] E. Jespers, G. Olteanu, Á. del Río, Rational group algebras of finite groups: From idempotents to units of integral group rings, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 15 (2012), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-010-9244-4 doi: 10.1007/s10468-010-9244-4
    [16] G. Olteanu, I. Van Gelder, Finite group algebras of nilpotent groups: A complete set of orthogonal primitive idempotents, Finite Fields Appl., 17 (2011), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ffa.2010.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ffa.2010.10.005
    [17] E. Jespers, G. Olteanu, Á. del Río, I. Van Gelder, Group rings of finite strongly monomial group: Central units and primitive idempotents. J. Algebra, 387 (2013), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2013.04.020 doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2013.04.020
    [18] E. Jespers, Á. del Río, Volume 1 Orders and Generic Constructions of Units, Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110372946
    [19] C. Bagiński, Modular group algebras of 2-groups of maximal class, Comm. Algebra, 20 (1992), 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927879208824402 doi: 10.1080/00927879208824402
    [20] D. B. Coleman, Finite groups with isomorphic group algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 105 (1962), 1–8.
    [21] D. Tambara, S. Yamagami, Tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for finite abelian groups, J. Algebra, 209 (1998), 692–707. https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1998.7558 doi: 10.1006/jabr.1998.7558
    [22] J. P. Serre, Linear representations of finite groups, New York: Springer, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9458-7
    [23] P. Webb, A course in finite group representation theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316677216
    [24] G. D. James, M. W. Liebeak, Representations and characters of groups. 2 Eds., New York: Cambridge University, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814532
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(611) PDF downloads(36) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog