In this paper, we propose a novel approach to the fractional power of the Laplace-Bessel operator Δν, defined as
Δν=n∑i=1∂2∂x2i+νixi∂∂xi,νi≥0.
The fractional power of this operator is introduced as a pseudo-differential operator through the multi-dimensional Bessel transform. Our primary contributions encompass a normalized singular integral representation, Bochner subordination, and intertwining relations.
Citation: Borhen Halouani, Fethi Bouzeffour. On the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21524-21537. doi: 10.3934/math.20241045
[1] | Iqra Nayab, Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty, Emad E. Mahmoud, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Estimation of generalized fractional integral operators with nonsingular function as a kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4492-4506. doi: 10.3934/math.2021266 |
[2] | Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Iqra Nayab, Gauhar Rahman, Thabet Abdeljawad, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Integral transforms of an extended generalized multi-index Bessel function. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7531-7547. doi: 10.3934/math.2020482 |
[3] | Georgia Irina Oros, Gheorghe Oros, Daniela Andrada Bardac-Vlada . Certain geometric properties of the fractional integral of the Bessel function of the first kind. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7095-7110. doi: 10.3934/math.2024346 |
[4] | D. L. Suthar, A. M. Khan, A. Alaria, S. D. Purohit, J. Singh . Extended Bessel-Maitland function and its properties pertaining to integral transforms and fractional calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1400-1410. doi: 10.3934/math.2020096 |
[5] | Sobia Rafeeq, Sabir Hussain, Jongsuk Ro . On fractional Bullen-type inequalities with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24590-24609. doi: 10.3934/math.20241198 |
[6] | Rana Safdar Ali, Saba Batool, Shahid Mubeen, Asad Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Muhammad Samraiz, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Roshan Noor Mohamed . On generalized fractional integral operator associated with generalized Bessel-Maitland function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3027-3046. doi: 10.3934/math.2022167 |
[7] | Ruma Qamar, Tabinda Nahid, Mumtaz Riyasat, Naresh Kumar, Anish Khan . Gould-Hopper matrix-Bessel and Gould-Hopper matrix-Tricomi functions and related integral representations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4613-4623. doi: 10.3934/math.2020296 |
[8] | Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Iqra Nayab, Gauhar Rahman, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dumitru Baleanu . Some generalized fractional integral inequalities with nonsingular function as a kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3352-3377. doi: 10.3934/math.2021201 |
[9] | Jamshed Nasir, Shahid Qaisar, Saad Ihsan Butt, Ather Qayyum . Some Ostrowski type inequalities for mappings whose second derivatives are preinvex function via fractional integral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3303-3320. doi: 10.3934/math.2022184 |
[10] | Shahid Khan, Saqib Hussain, Maslina Darus . Inclusion relations of q-Bessel functions associated with generalized conic domain. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3624-3640. doi: 10.3934/math.2021216 |
In this paper, we propose a novel approach to the fractional power of the Laplace-Bessel operator Δν, defined as
Δν=n∑i=1∂2∂x2i+νixi∂∂xi,νi≥0.
The fractional power of this operator is introduced as a pseudo-differential operator through the multi-dimensional Bessel transform. Our primary contributions encompass a normalized singular integral representation, Bochner subordination, and intertwining relations.
Fractional calculus has emerged as both an important and powerful mathematical tool, finding applications across diverse scientific domains where phenomena often display non-local or anomalous behavior [1,2,3,4]. In particular, the fractional power of the Laplace operator Δ=∑ni=1∂2i is a focal point of investigation in various mathematical and applied contexts [5,6,7,8]. Its definition involves the Fourier transform:
(−Δ)α/2ϕ=F−1(‖ξ‖αFϕ(ξ)),for ϕ∈S(Rn), |
where F and F−1 represent the Fourier transform and its inverse, and S(Rn) denotes the Schwartz space.
An alternative representation valid for α∈(0,2) of the fractional Laplacian is provided through a pointwise formula, as articulated in [9]:
(−Δ)α/2f(x)=1γn(α)limε→0∫Rn∖B(0,ε)f(x)−f(x−y)‖y‖n+α dy, |
where γn(α) is a constant defined as
γn(α)=πn/2|Γ(−α2)|2αΓ(n+α2), |
and B(0,ε) denotes the ball of radius ε centered at the origin.
It is crucial to recognize that the fractional Laplacian exhibits various equivalent definitions throughout Rn, as extensively discussed in [9]. This variability underscores the rich mathematical structure and diverse perspectives associated with this nonlocal differential operator.
Within this expansive framework, our study is dedicated to exploring a specific facet of fractional calculus, with a particular focus on a singular differential operator known as the Laplace-Bessel operator [10], (1.88)], which is given by
Δν=n∑i=1Bνi,Bνi=∂2∂x2i+νixi∂∂xi,νi≥0. | (1.1) |
The Laplace-Bessel operator serves as a mathematical model for phenomena characterized by multi-axial symmetry in various domains. Extensive harmonic analysis related to this operator has been conducted by prominent mathematicians, including B. Muckenhoupt and E. Stein [11], I. Kipriyanov, M. Klyuchantsev [12,13,14], K. Trimeche [15], L. Lyakhov [16,17], K. Stempak [18], E. L. Shishkina, and S. M. Sitnik [10], among others.
The fractional Laplace-Bessel operator, denoted as (−Δν)α/2 with order α, is introduced in our work as a pseudo-differential operator through the multi-dimensional Bessel transform. The investigation into the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator was pioneered by L. Lyakhov [19], and additional insights have been contributed by [16,20]. For specific insights into the one-dimensional case, refer to [10,21,22,23].
Since the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator reduces to the standard Laplacian when the multi-index \(\nu\) is equal to zero, a challenging question arises: Does the equivalence of the ten definitions of the fractional Laplace operator still hold for the fractional Bessel operator? To address this question, we ground our investigation in a meticulously defined function space, denoted as \(\mathscr{H}_\nu^{\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^n_+)\), capturing functions that exhibit well-behaved behavior under the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator. This space is inspired by the fractional Sobolev spaces introduced by Butzer et al. [24].
To tackle this question, we employ the well-known multi-dimensional Poisson transform \(\mathscr{P}_\nu\), as defined in [10], Definition 23], and establish a new intertwining relation between the fractional Laplacian and the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator valid in the Schwartz space \(S_*(\mathbb{R}^n)\), given by
Pν(−Δ)α/2=(−Δν)α/2Pν. | (1.2) |
This relation is reduced for α=2 to the one obtained in [10], Statement 4, pp. 137]. Since the multi-dimensional Poisson transform keeps the Schwartz space invariant, this particularly partially responds to our starting question.
The structure of the paper is as follows:
In Section 2, we provide an initial overview of foundational concepts. The topics covered encompass the multi-dimensional Bessel transform, generalized translation operator, and generalized convolution, collectively setting the stage for a comprehensive understanding of subsequent content.
Section 3 succinctly presents the primary research outcomes. Here, we summarize the significant findings that have been attained through our investigation.
In Section 4, we furnish a comprehensive proof of the core results. Through meticulous derivation and thorough explanation, we establish the validity of our findings, providing readers with an in-depth grasp of the underlying mathematical foundations.
Finally, in Section 5, we present additional results, including relations such as Bochner subordination and intertwining relations for the fractional Laplace-Bessel.
In the subsequent discussions, we will employ the following notations:
● \(S_*(\mathbb{R}^{n}) \): The space of \(C^\infty\) functions, even with respect to each variable, and rapidly decreasing together with their derivatives.
● \(L^p_\nu(\mathbb{R}^{n}_+) \), \(1 \leq p \leq \infty\): The space of measurable functions \(f \) on \(\mathbb{R}^{n}_+ \) such that
‖f‖ν,p=(∫Rn+|f(x)|pxνdx)1/p<∞,p∈[1,∞), |
‖f‖ν,∞=esssupx∈Rn+|f(x)|<∞. |
Here, \(\nu = (\nu_1, \nu_2, \dots, \nu_n)\) and \(x^\nu = x_1^{\nu_1} \ldots x_n^{\nu_n} \) and \(\mathbb{R}^n_+ = \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : x_1 > 0, \ldots, x_n > 0\} \).
Let \(\nu = (\nu_1, \ldots, \nu_n) \) be a multi-index with each \(\nu_i \geq 0 \). The multi-dimensional Bessel transform \(\mathscr{F}_\nu\phi \) of a function \(\phi \in L^1_{\nu}(\mathbb{R}_+^n) \) is defined by
Fνϕ(ξ)=ˆϕ(ξ)=∫Rn+ϕ(x)Jν(x,ξ)xνdx, |
where the multi-dimensional Bessel function \(\mathscr{J}_\nu(x, \xi) \) is defined as
Jν(x,ξ)=n∏i=1jνi−12(xiξi),with Jν(0,ξ)=1. |
Here, \(j_\gamma (t)\) is the normalized Bessel function of the first kind, given by
jγ(t)=2γΓ(γ+1)t−γJγ(t),γ≥−1/2, |
and \(J_\gamma (t)\) denotes the Bessel function of the first kind [25,26]. We list some well-known basic properties of the multi-dimensional Bessel transform as follows: For the proofs, we refer to [10] and the references therein.
(ⅰ) For all ϕ∈L1ν(Rn+), the function Fνϕ is continuous on Rn+, and we have
‖Fνϕ‖ν,∞≤‖ϕ‖ν,1. | (2.1) |
(ⅱ) The multi-dimensional Bessel transform Fν acts as a topological isomorphism on S∗(Rn), seamlessly extending to an isomorphism on L2ν(Rn+), where, for any ϕ∈L2ν(Rn+), the following Plancherel formula holds:
∫Rn+|Fνϕ(ξ)|2ξνdξ=aν∫Rn+|ϕ(x)|2xνdx, | (2.2) |
where
aν=2|ν|−nn∏i=1Γ2(νi+12). | (2.3) |
(ⅲ) Inversion formula: Let ϕ∈L1ν(Rn+) such that Fνϕ∈L1ν(Rn+), then we have
F−1νϕ(ξ)=1aν∫Rn+ϕ(x)Jν(x,ξ)xνdx. | (2.4) |
The multi-dimensional generalized translation of a continuous function ϕ on Rn denoted by τxϕ is defined as follows [10], Definition 26]:
τxϕ(y):=n∏i=1Γ(νi+1)√πΓ(νi+12)∫π0…∫π0ϕ((x1,y1)θ1,…,(xn,yn)θn)×n∏i=1sin2νiθidθ1…dθn, | (2.5) |
where
(xi,yi)θi=√x2i+y2i−2xiyicosθi,i=1,…,n. | (2.6) |
For every \(\phi\in L^{p}_{\nu}(\mathbb{R}^{n}_{+}) \), the function \(\tau_x \phi\) belongs to \(L^{p}_{\nu}(\mathbb{R}^{n}_{+}) \), and we have
‖τxϕ‖ν,p≤‖ϕ‖ν,p. | (2.7) |
The convolution operator determined by τx is as follows:
(ϕ∗ψ)(x)=∫Rn+ϕ(ξ)τxψ(ξ)ξνdξ. | (2.8) |
This convolution operation is commutative, associative, and satisfies the following property: For \(\phi, \, \, \psi\in L^1_\nu(\mathbb{R}^n_+)\), the convolution \(\phi * \psi \in L^1_\nu(\mathbb{R}^n_+)\), and we have
Fν(ϕ∗ψ)=Fνϕ⋅Fνψ. |
In this section, we outline the central contributions of this paper, beginning with the introduction of the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator (−Δν)α/2 of order α. This fractional derivative is treated as a pseudo-differential operator using the multi-dimensional Bessel transform. To facilitate our discussions, we operate within a tailored function space defined as follows:
Hαν(Rn+)={ϕ∈L2ν(Rn+):∫Rn+‖ξ‖2α|Fνϕ(ξ)|2ξνdξ<∞}. | (3.1) |
In accordance with the terminology introduced by Butzer et al. in [24], we commonly denote the space Hαν(R) as the fractional Bessel space of order α.
Definition 3.1. Let 0<α<2. For ϕ∈Hαν(Rn+), we define the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator (−Δν)α/2ϕ as
(−Δν)α/2ϕ=F−1ν(‖⋅‖αFνϕ),inL2ν(Rn+). | (3.2) |
Remark 3.1. If ‖⋅‖αFνϕ∈L1ν(Rn+), then the integral in (3.2) exists as an ordinary Lebesgue integral, that is
(−Δν)α/2ϕ(ξ)=1aν∫Rn+‖x‖αFνϕ(x)Jν(x,ξ)xνdx,ξ∈Rn+. |
For α∈(0,2) and ε>0, we set
R(α)εϕ(x)=1γν(α)∫Rn+∖B(0,ε)ϕ(x)−τxϕ(ξ)‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξ, | (3.3) |
where the normalized constant \(\gamma_\nu(\alpha)\) is given by
γν(α)=|Γ(−α2)|∏ni=1Γ(νi+12)2α+nΓ(|ν|+α+n2). | (3.4) |
The following theorem represents the first main result, as it seeks to characterize the fractional Bessel space Hαν(Rn+) defined in (3.1).
Theorem 3.1. Let α∈(0,2). The following statements are equivalent:
(i) ϕ∈L2ν(Rn+) and there exists ψ∈L2ν(Rn+) such that:
‖R(α)εϕ−ψ‖2,ν=o(1)asε↓0; |
(ii) ‖R(α)εϕ‖2,ν=O(1) as ε↓0;
(iii) ϕ∈Hαν(Rn+).
In this specific case, the theorem presented below manifests the classical fractional-order derivative, extensively explored by A. Marchaud in 1927 [27]. His work holds fundamental importance in approximation theory and fractional calculus.
Theorem 3.2. Let α∈(0,2). For a function ϕ∈Hα(Rn+), the fractional multi-dimensional Bessel operator (−Δν)α/2ϕ(x) can be represented as follows:
(−Δν)α/2ϕ(x)=1γν(α)limε→0+∫Rn+∖B(0,ε)ϕ(x)−τxϕ(ξ)‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξinL2ν(Rn+). |
Building upon Theorem 3.2 with \(\nu = (0, \dots, 0)\), we derive the following representation of the Laplace operator \(\Delta = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2_1} + \dots + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2_n}\) throughout \(\mathbb{R}^n_+\).
Corollary 3.1. Let \(\alpha \in (0, 2)\). For a function \(\phi \in \mathscr{H}_\alpha(\mathbb{R}^n_+)\), the fractional Laplace operator \((- \Delta)^{\alpha/2}\phi(x)\) on \(\mathbb{R}^n_+\) can be represented as follows:
(−Δ)α/2ϕ(x)=1γ(α)limε→0+∫Rn+∖B(0,ε)2ϕ(x)−ϕ(x+ξ)+ϕ(x−ξ)‖ξ‖n+αξndξ, |
where the normalized constant \(\gamma(\alpha)\) is given by
γ(α)=πn2|Γ(−α2)|2n+αΓ(n+α2). |
The corollary that follows, has previously been established in [23]. It is a direct consequence of Theorem 3.2 in the case when \(n = 1\) and \(\nu \geq 0\).
Corollary 3.2. For a function ϕ∈Hα(R+), the fractional Bessel derivative \((-B_\nu)^{\alpha/2}\phi\), with \(\alpha \in (0, 2)\), takes the form:
(−Bν)α/2ϕ(x)=2α+1Γ(ν+α+12)Γ(ν+12)|Γ(−α2)|limε→0+∫∞εϕ(x)−τxϕ(ξ)ξα+1dξ. |
The next proposition highlights additional properties of the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator, which can be readily discerned by employing (3.2) and the traits of the multi-dimensional Bessel transform. The specific details are intentionally left for the readers.
Proposition 3.1. Let ϕ, ψ∈Hν(Rn+).
(i) Translation invariance: for all x∈Rn+,
τx(−Δν)α/2ϕ=(−Δν)α/2τxϕ,inL2ν(Rn+). |
ii) Convolution invariance:
(−Δν)α/2(ϕ∗ψ)=((−Δν)α/2ϕ)∗ψ,inL2ν(Rn+). |
iii) Symmetry:
⟨(−Δν)α/2ϕ,ψ⟩L2ν(Rn+)=⟨ϕ,(−Δν)α/2ψ⟩L2ν(Rn+). |
Lemma 4.1. For α∈(0,2), it holds
∫Rn+1−Tν(x,ξ)‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξ=γν(α)‖x‖α. |
Proof. We start by recalling the following formula [25], Ch.12]:
∫∞0Jγ(ar)rγ+1e−p2r2dr=aγ(2p2)γ+1e−a2/4p2,Re(γ)>−1. | (4.1) |
Then
12|ν|t|ν|+12∏ni=1Γ(νi+12)∫Rn+e−‖ξ|2/4tJγ(x,ξ)ξνdξ=e−t‖x‖2. | (4.2) |
In particular, for x=0, and using the fact that Tν(0,ξ)=1, we get
12|ν|t|ν|+12∏ni=1Γ(νi+12)∫Rn+e−‖ξ|2/4tξνdξ=1. | (4.3) |
Combining (4.2) and (4.3) to get
∫Rn+e−‖ξ|2/4tt12(|ν|+n)(1−Tν(x,ξ))ξνdξ=2|ν|n∏i=1Γ(νi+12)(1−e−t‖x‖2). | (4.4) |
Multiplying both sides of (4.4) by t−1−α/2 and integrating over (0,∞) with respect to the variable t, we obtain
∫Rn+∫∞0e−‖ξ|2/4tt1+12(|ν|+α+n)(1−Tν(x,ξ))ξνdtdξ=2|ν|n∏i=1Γ(νi+12)∫∞01−e−t‖ξ‖2t1+α/2dt. | (4.5) |
A straightforward computation reveals that
∫∞0e−‖ξ‖24tt1+12(|ν|+α+n)dt=2|ν|+n+αΓ((|ν|+n+α)/2)‖ξ‖−(|ν|+n+α). |
To evaluate the second integral in (4.5), we use the following:
λα/2=1|Γ(−α2)|∫∞0(1−e−tλ)dtt1+α2,0<α<2. | (4.6) |
Therefore,
∫Rn+1−Tν(x,ξ)‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξ=|Γ(−α2)|∏ni=1Γ(νi+12)2α+nΓ(|ν|+α+n2)‖x‖α. |
λα,ε(x)=1γν(α)∫Rn+∖B(0,ε)1−Tν(x,ξ)‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξ. | (4.7) |
In the following, we give some elementary properties of λα,ε(x), and their proofs follows easily from Lemma 4.1.
Lemma 4.2. For the function λα,ε(x), the following holds:
i) |λα,ε(x)|≤1,
ii) |λα,ε(x)|≤‖x‖α,
iii) limε↓0 λα,ε(x)=‖x‖α.
Proposition 4.1. For 0<α<2, the operator R(α)ε is a bounded operator from L2ν(Rn+) onto itself, and satisfies
‖R(α)εf‖2,ν≤κ(ε)‖f‖2,ν, | (4.8) |
where
κ(ε)=2α+1Γ(|ν|+α+n2)αεα|Γ(−α2)|Γ(n+|ν|2). | (4.9) |
Proof. Applying Holder-Minkowski inequality and using (2.7), we get
‖f(x)−τxf(ξ)‖2,ν≤2‖f‖2,ν. | (4.10) |
This leads to
‖R(α)εf‖2,ν≤2‖f‖2,νγν(α)∫CB(0,ε)1‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξ. |
Utilizing polar coordinates, the integral becomes
∫CB(0,ε)1‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξ=∫∞ε1rα+1∫Sn−1+ωνdσ(ω)dr. | (4.11) |
From [28], we have
∫Sn−1+ωνdσ(ω)=∏ni=1Γ(νi+12)2n−1Γ(n+|ν|2). | (4.12) |
Therefore,
∫CB(0,ε)1‖ξ‖|ν|+α+nξνdξ=2α+1Γ(|ν|+α+n2)αεα|Γ(−α2)|Γ(n+|ν|2). | (4.13) |
This completes the proof.
Proposition 4.2. Let ϕ∈L2ν(Rn+). The multi-dimensional Bessel transform of R(α)εϕ is given by
Fν(R(α)εϕ)=λα,εFκϕ,inL2ν(Rn+). | (4.14) |
Proof. For ϕ∈L2ν(Rn+), and since L1ν(Rn+)∩L2ν(Rn+) is dense in L2ν(Rn+), we choose a sequence ϕn∈L1ν(Rn+)∩L2ν(Rn+) with limn→∞‖ϕn−ϕ‖2,ν=0. By Fubini's theorem, we easily obtain
Fν(R(α)εϕn)(x)=λα,ε(x)Fν(ϕn)(x). | (4.15) |
Then, by Lemma 4.2 and the isometry property of the multi-dimension Bessel transform,
‖Fν(R(α)εϕ)−λα,ε(x)Fνϕ‖2,κ≤‖Fκ(R(α)εϕ)−Fν(R(α)εϕn)‖2,ν+‖λα,ε{Fν(ϕn)−Fν(ϕ)}‖2,ν≤C(ε)‖ϕ−ϕn‖2,ν, |
where C(ε)=a1/2ν(κ(ε)+2). Thus, this proves the assertion.
Now, we proceed to the proof of Theorem 3.1.
Proof. We will establish the implications (i)⇒(ii), (ii)⇒(iii), and (iii)⇒(i).
(i)⇒(ii): This implication is direct.
(ii)⇒(iii): Assume that condition (ii) holds. Utilizing Fatou's Lemma, we obtain
‖‖.‖αFνϕ‖2,ν≤lim infε↓0‖λα,εFνϕ‖2,ν=lim infε↓0‖Fν(R(α)εϕ)‖2,ν=aνlim infε↓0‖R(α)εϕ‖2,ν. |
Since the last term is finite due to the assumed condition, we establish (iii).
(iii)⇒(i): Assume ϕ∈Hαν(Rn+). Given that the multi-dimensional Bessel transform is an isomorphism of L2ν(Rn+), there exists ψ∈L2ν(Rn+) such that Fνψ(x)=‖x‖αFνϕ(x). Consequently, we have
a1/2ν‖R(α)εϕ(x)−ψ(x)‖2,ν=‖Fν(R(α)εϕ)−Fν(ψ)‖2,ν=‖(λα,ε(x)−‖x‖α)Fν(ϕ)‖2,ν. |
Additionally, we find
(λα,ε(x)−‖x‖α)2|Fνϕ|2≤4‖x‖2α|Fνϕ|2=4|Fνψ|2. |
Applying the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, we conclude that
limε↓0‖(λα,ε−‖⋅‖α)2Fνϕ‖22,ν=0. |
This completes the proof of (i).
Hence, we have established all three implications, concluding the proof.
Proof of Theorem 3.2. By applying Proposition 4.1 and utilizing Lemma 4.2 (ⅲ), we have
limε→0+Fν(R(α)εϕ)(ξ)=limε→0+λα,ε(ξ)Fνϕ(ξ)=‖ξ‖αFνϕ(ξ). | (4.16) |
Furthermore, employing the isometry property of the multi-dimensional Bessel transform,
limε→0+‖Fν(R(α)εϕ)−Fν(−Δν)α/2ϕ)‖2,ν=limε→0+‖R(α)εϕ−(−Δν)α/2ϕ‖2,ν=0. |
Since the pointwise limit must coincide almost everywhere with the strong limit, the assertion follows.
In what follows, we restrict ourselves to the Schwartz space S∗(Rn). For ϕ∈S∗(Rn) and α>0, as indicated in Remark 3.1, the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator (−Δν)α/2ϕ(ξ) is given by
(−Δν)α/2ϕ(ξ)=1aν∫Rn+‖x‖αFνϕ(x)Jν(x,ξ)xνdx. |
Since the multi-dimensional Bessel transform Fν maps the Schwartz space S∗(Rn) onto itself, it is evident that (−Δν)α/2ϕ is a C∞-bounded function on Rn, and it satisfies the relationship
Δν(−Δν)α/2ϕ=(−Δν)α/2Δνϕ. |
By the dominated convergence theorem, we obtain the following results:
limα→0(−Δν)α/2ϕ=ϕandlimα→2(−Δν)α/2ϕ=−Δνϕ. |
For α∈(0,2), we have
(−Δν)α/2ϕ(x)=1γν(α)∫Rn+ϕ(x)−τxϕ(ξ)‖ξ‖|ν|+n+αξνdξ. |
Before stating our result, let's recall that the Laplace-Bessel operator \(-\Delta_\nu\) is the generator of a strongly continuous one-parameter semigroup \(\{e^{t\Delta_\nu}\}_{t \geq 0}\), where the operator \(e^{t\Delta_\nu}\) is defined as [29]
etΔνϕ=F−1ν(e−t‖⋅‖2Fνϕ), | (5.1) |
for all \(t \geq 0\) and \(\phi \in L^2_\nu(\mathbb{R}^n_+)\). Consequently, \(e^{t\Delta_\nu}\) is an integral operator represented by
etΔνϕ(x)=(Gtν∗ϕ)(x)=∫Rn+τxGtν(ξ)ϕ(ξ)dμν(ξ), |
where
Gtν(x)=e−‖x‖24t2|ν|t|ν|+12∏ni=1Γ(νi+12). | (5.2) |
Of particular interest is the scenario when p∈[1,2) and ϕ∈C0(Rn)∩Lp(Rn+). In this case, the function u(t,x)=Gtν∗ϕ(x) plays a pivotal role as an infinitely smooth solution to the Cauchy problem:
{Δνu(x,t)=∂u(x,t)∂t,u(x,0)=ϕ(x). |
Theorem 5.1. Let 0<α<2. For ϕ∈S∗(Rn), we have
(−Δν)α/2ϕ(x)=1|Γ(−α2)|∫∞0(ϕ(x)−etΔνϕ(x))dtt1+α2. | (5.3) |
Proof. Since etΔkϕ∈S∗(Rn), applying the inversion formula for the multi-dimensional Bessel transform and the properties (5.1) of the heat semigroup, we obtain:
ϕ(x)−etΔνϕ(x)=1aν∫Rn+(1−e−t‖ξ‖2)Fνϕ(ξ)Tν(x,ξ)ξνdξ. |
This equality, combined with the relation (2.1), implies that
∫∞0|ϕ(x)−etΔνϕ(x)|dtt1+α2=|Γ(−α2)|aν∫Rn+‖ξ‖α|Fνϕ(ξ)|ξνdξ<+∞. |
Therefore, Fubini's theorem can be applied to obtain
1Γ(−α2)∫∞0ϕ(x)−etΔνϕ(x)dtt1+α2=1aν∫Rn+‖ξ‖αFνϕ(ξ)Tν(x,ξ)ξν=(−Δν)α/2ϕ(x). |
Recall the well-known Poisson operator \(\mathscr{P}_\nu \phi (x) \). This operator acts on the integrable function \(\phi\in L^p_\nu(\mathbb{R}^n_+) \) and is defined by
Pνϕ(x)=cνx2ν∫x10…∫xn0ϕ(ξ)n∏i=1(x2i−ξ2i)νi−1/2dξi, | (5.4) |
where the normalized constant \(c_\nu \) is given by
cν=n∏i=12Γ(νi+1)√πΓ(νi+1/2). | (5.5) |
In one dimension, the Poisson transform is also known as the Riemann-Liouville transform. Extending this concept to multiple dimensions, we can refer to the Poisson transform as the multi-dimensional Riemann-Liouville transform. It has been demonstrated in [10], pp. 137] that the Poisson integral transform serves as an intertwining operator between the multi-dimensional Bessel operator and the Laplace operator \(\Delta \) on \(\mathbb{R}^n_+\). More precisely, for \(\phi \in S_*(\mathbb{R}^n)\), we have
PνΔϕ=ΔνPνϕ. | (5.6) |
In the following theorem, we extend the intertwining relation (5.6) to the fractional setting.
Theorem 5.2. In the Schwartz space \(S_*(\mathbb{R}^n)\), the following intertwining relation holds:
Pν(−Δ)α/2=(−Δν)α/2Pν. | (5.7) |
Proof. From [10], formula 3.138], we have
Tν(x,ξ)=Pν[e−i⟨x,ξ⟩]. | (5.8) |
By applying the inversion formula for the standard Fourier transform \(\mathcal{F}\) and utilizing Fubini's theorem, we derive the following expression:
Pν(etΔϕ)(x)=1aν∫Rn+e−t‖ξ‖2Fϕ(ξ)Pν[e−i⟨x,ξ⟩]ξνdξ=1aν∫Rn+e−t‖ξ‖2Fϕ(ξ)Tν(x,ξ)ξνdξ. |
Utilizing this equality, the intertwining relation (5.6), and the differentiation theorem under the integral sign, we observe that
ΔνPν(etΔϕ)=PνΔ(etΔϕ)=Pν(∂∂tetΔϕ)=∂∂tPν(etΔϕ). |
Additionally, the dominated convergence theorem implies that limt→0Pν(etΔϕ)=Pνϕ. Hence, the function Pν(etΔϕ) serves as a solution to the Δν-Cauchy problem:
{Δνu(x,t)=∂u(x,t)∂t,u(x,0)=Pνϕ(x). |
As Pνϕ is bounded, the solution to this problem is unique, yielding
etΔν[Pν(ϕ)]=Pν(etΔϕ). |
Finally, combining this relation with (5.3) and Fubini's theorem yields the desired intertwining relation.
In conclusion, our study focuses on the domain of fractional calculus by introducing and analyzing the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator as a pseudo-differential operator. We have successfully established a comprehensive framework that not only elucidates the fundamental properties of the fractional Laplace-Bessel operator but also connects it with the classical fractional Laplacian through a novel intertwining relation. This relationship is validated within the Schwartz space. Future research will aim to further explore the practical applications of these theoretical findings and extend the analysis to other related fractional differential operators.
All authors contributed equally and significantly to the study conception and design, material preparation, data collection and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [F. Bouzeffour] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R974), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] | K. B. Oldham, J. Spanier, The fractional calculus: Theory and applications of differentiation and integration to arbitrary order, New York and London: Academic Press, 1974. |
[2] | B. Ross, The development of fractional calculus, New York: Academic Press, 1975. |
[3] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, Elsevier, 1998. |
[4] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, 2006. |
[5] |
O. Abu Arqub, Computational algorithm for solving singular Fredholm time-fractional partial integrodifferential equations with error estimates, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 59 (2019), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-018-1176-x doi: 10.1007/s12190-018-1176-x
![]() |
[6] |
B. Maayah, A. Moussaoui, S. Bushnaq, O. Abu Arqub, The multistep Laplace optimized decomposition method for solving fractional-order coronavirus disease model (COVID-19) via the Caputo fractional approach, Demonstr. Math., 55 (2022), 963–977. https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2022-0183 doi: 10.1515/dema-2022-0183
![]() |
[7] |
O. Abu Arqub, B. Maayah, Adaptive the Dirichlet model of mobile/immobile advection/dispersion in a time-fractional sense with the reproducing kernel computational approach: Formulations and approximations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 37 (2023), 2350179. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979223501795 doi: 10.1142/S0217979223501795
![]() |
[8] |
A. Lischke, G. Pang, M. Gulian, F. Song, C. Glusa, X. Zheng, et al., What is the fractional Laplacian? A comparative review with new results, J. Comput. Phys., 404 (2020), 109009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109009 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109009
![]() |
[9] |
M. Kwasnicki, Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional Laplace operator, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 20 (2017), 7–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2017-0002 doi: 10.1515/fca-2017-0002
![]() |
[10] | E. L. Shishkina, S. M. Sitnik, Transmutations, singular and fractional differential equations with applications to mathematical physics, Academic Press, 2020. |
[11] | B. Muckenhoupt, E. Stein, Classical expansions and their relation to conjugate harmonic functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 118 (1965), 17–92. |
[12] | I. A. Kipriyanov, Singular elliptic boundary value problems, 1997. |
[13] | I. A. Kipriyanov, Fourier-Bessel transforms and imbedding theorems for weighted classes, Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov., 89 (1967), 130–213. |
[14] |
I. A. Kipriyanov, M. I. Klyuchantsev, On singular integrals generated by the generalized shift operator Ⅱ, Sib. Math. J., 11 (1970), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00967838 doi: 10.1007/BF00967838
![]() |
[15] |
K. Trimeche, Inversion of the Lions transmutation operators using generalized wavelets, Appl. Comput. Harmon. A., 4 (1997), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1006/acha.1996.0206 doi: 10.1006/acha.1996.0206
![]() |
[16] | L. N. Lyakhov, On classes of spherical functions and singular pseudodifferential operators, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 272 (1983), 781–784. |
[17] |
L. N. Lyakhov, E. L. Shishkina, General B-hypersingular integrals with homogeneous characteristic, Dokl. Math., 75 (2007), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562407010127 doi: 10.1134/S1064562407010127
![]() |
[18] | K. Stempak, The Littlewood-Paley theory for the Fourier-Bessel transform, Mathematical Institute University of Wroclaw (Poland), 1985. |
[19] | L. N. Lyakhov, A class of hypersingular integrals, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 315 (1990), 291–296. |
[20] |
L. N. Lyakhov, E. L. Shishkina, General B-hypersingular integrals with homogeneous characteristic, Dokl. Math., 75, (2007), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562407010127 doi: 10.1134/S1064562407010127
![]() |
[21] |
E. L. Shishkina, S. M. Sitnik, On fractional powers of the Bessel operator on semiaxis, Sib. Electron. Math. Rep., 15 (2018), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17377/semi.2018.15.001 doi: 10.17377/semi.2018.15.001
![]() |
[22] | A. Fitouhi, I. Jebabli, E. L. Shishkina, S. M. Sitnik, Applications of integral transforms composition method to wave-type singular differential equations and index shift transmutations, Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 1–27. |
[23] |
F. Bouzeffour, M. Garayev, On the fractional Bessel operator, Integr. Transf. Spec. F., 33 (2022), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2021.1925268 doi: 10.1080/10652469.2021.1925268
![]() |
[24] |
P. L. Butzer, G. Schmeisser, R. L. Stens, Sobolev spaces of fractional order, Lipschitz spaces, readapted modulation spaces and their interrelations; applications, J. Approx. Theory, 212 (2016), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jat.2016.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jat.2016.08.001
![]() |
[25] | G. N. Watson, A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions, 1922. |
[26] | T. H. Koornwinder, R. Wong, R. Koekoek, R. F. Swarttouw, W. P. Reinhardt, Orthogonal polynomials, NIST handbook of mathematical functions. |
[27] | A. Marchaud, Sur les dérivées et sur les différences des fonctions de variables réelles, J. Math. Pure. Appl., 6 (1927), 337–425. |
[28] | D. R. Coscia, The volume of the n-sphere, Suffolk Country Community College, 1973. |
[29] |
A. J. Castro, T. Z. Szarek, Calderón-Zygmund operators in the Bessel setting for all possible type indices, Acta Math. Sin. English Ser., 30 (2014), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-014-2326-1 doi: 10.1007/s10114-014-2326-1
![]() |