A bi-level humanitarian response plan design model considering equity and efficiency—the example of Yemen

Ibrahim M. Hezam; Ibrahim M. Hezam

doi:10.3934/math.2023979

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 8: 19172-19209. doi: 10.3934/math.2023979

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

A bi-level humanitarian response plan design model considering equity and efficiency—the example of Yemen

Ibrahim M. Hezam ^,

Department of Statistics & Operations Research, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Received: 19 November 2022 Revised: 29 May 2023 Accepted: 30 May 2023 Published: 07 June 2023
MSC : 90B06, 90C29

Yemen has suffered from a civil war since 2015, which caused the largest famine in the world at this time. People came in need of urgent humanitarian relief in all sectors. In this situation, the donor countries are offering funds to non-profit humanitarian organizations to help Yemen in critical sectors, such as food, health, water, education and other sectors. We propose a new bi-level optimization distribution model for large-scale emergency logistics in Yemen. The upper-level model aims to minimize the unmet demand. The lower-level model seeks to maximize the funds sent to affected areas that fulfill the needs of the affected people by appealing to the donor countries to increase the funds. This model ensures a satisfying rate of equity and efficiency distribution among aid recipients of all governorates of Yemen based on their needs. We consider in this work the top ten donor countries, the nine sectors of the sustainable development goals, the five top humanitarian organizations and twenty-two disastrous regions. The model is applied and validated using actual data collected from Yemen in 2021. The results indicate the necessity of redistributing funds to all governorates of Yemen according to their needs and the priority of the supporting sectors. This proposed model is essential to humanitarian relief decision-makers in general and workers in Yemen in particular as it ensures the continuous flow of aid from donors to beneficiaries and is equitable and effectively distributed. It also gives a glimpse of the importance of continuing to appeal for fundraising from the donors to increase funds and their importance to cover the most significant percentage of those affected.
- humanitarian response plan,
- bi-level optimization,
- equity distribution,
- efficacy,
- unmet demand,
- Mathematics Subject Classification: 90B06,
- 90C29
Citation: Ibrahim M. Hezam. A bi-level humanitarian response plan design model considering equity and efficiency—the example of Yemen[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19172-19209. doi: 10.3934/math.2023979

Related Papers:

Abstract

Yemen has suffered from a civil war since 2015, which caused the largest famine in the world at this time. People came in need of urgent humanitarian relief in all sectors. In this situation, the donor countries are offering funds to non-profit humanitarian organizations to help Yemen in critical sectors, such as food, health, water, education and other sectors. We propose a new bi-level optimization distribution model for large-scale emergency logistics in Yemen. The upper-level model aims to minimize the unmet demand. The lower-level model seeks to maximize the funds sent to affected areas that fulfill the needs of the affected people by appealing to the donor countries to increase the funds. This model ensures a satisfying rate of equity and efficiency distribution among aid recipients of all governorates of Yemen based on their needs. We consider in this work the top ten donor countries, the nine sectors of the sustainable development goals, the five top humanitarian organizations and twenty-two disastrous regions. The model is applied and validated using actual data collected from Yemen in 2021. The results indicate the necessity of redistributing funds to all governorates of Yemen according to their needs and the priority of the supporting sectors. This proposed model is essential to humanitarian relief decision-makers in general and workers in Yemen in particular as it ensures the continuous flow of aid from donors to beneficiaries and is equitable and effectively distributed. It also gives a glimpse of the importance of continuing to appeal for fundraising from the donors to increase funds and their importance to cover the most significant percentage of those affected.

References

[1]	M. Stewart, D. Ivanov, Design redundancy in agile and resilient humanitarian supply chains, Ann. Oper. Res., 319 (2019), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03507-5 doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03507-5
[2]	OCHA (2021) Humanitarian Needs Overview-Yemen. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/yemen/yemen-humanitarian-needs-overview-2021-february-2021-enar.
[3]	J. Bracken, J. T. McGill, Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints, Oper. Res., 21 (1973), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.21.1.37 doi: 10.1287/opre.21.1.37
[4]	E. Gralla, J. Goentzel, C. Fine, Assessing Trade-offs among Multiple Objectives for Humanitarian Aid Delivery Using Expert Preferences, Prod. Oper. Manag., 23 (2014), 978–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12110 doi: 10.1111/poms.12110
[5]	K. S. Shehadeh, L. V. Snyder, Equity in Stochastic Healthcare Facility Location, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.03760.
[6]	A. M. Anaya-Arenas, A. Ruiz, J. Renaud, Importance of fairness in humanitarian relief distribution, Prod. Plan. Control, 29 (2018), 1145–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1542157 doi: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1542157
[7]	K. Huang, R. Rafiei, Equitable last mile distribution in emergency response, Comput. Ind. Eng., 127 (2019), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.025 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.025
[8]	M. H. Islam, J. S. Ivy, Modeling the role of efficiency for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food, OR Spectrum, 44 (2022), 485–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-021-00634-z doi: 10.1007/s00291-021-00634-z
[9]	M. Mostajabdaveh, W. J. Gutjahr, F. Sibel Salman, Inequity-averse shelter location for disaster preparedness, ⅡSE Trans., 51 (2019), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1496372
[10]	X. Li, R. Batta, C. Kwon, Effective and equitable supply of gasoline to impacted areas in the aftermath of a natural disaster, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 57 (2017), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2016.08.001
[11]	R. Noham, M. Tzur, Design and incentive decisions to increase cooperation in humanitarian relief networks, ⅡSE Trans., 52 (2020), 1297–1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2020.1727070 doi: 10.1080/24725854.2020.1727070
[12]	I. S. Orgut, J. Ivy, R. Uzsoy, J. R. Wilson, Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food under capacity constraints, ⅡE Trans., 48 (2016), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1063792 doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1063792
[13]	I. S. Orgut, J. Ivy, R. Uzsoy, Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of food donations under stochastic receiving capacities, ⅡSE Trans., 49 (2017), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2017.1300358 doi: 10.1080/24725854.2017.1300358
[14]	M. Firouz, L. Li, B. Cobb, F. Shao, On the equity-efficiency trade-off in food-bank network operations, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2155590 doi: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2155590
[15]	M. Firouz, L. Li, D. Ahmed, A. Ahmed, Dynamics of Equity, Efficiency, and Efficacy in Home Health Care with Patient and Caregiver Preferences, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.05845.
[16]	A. Afshar, A. Haghani, Modeling integrated supply chain logistics in real-time large-scale disaster relief operations, Socioecon Plan. Sci., 46 (2012), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2011.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2011.12.003
[17]	S. Enayati, O. Y. Özaltın, Optimal influenza vaccine distribution with equity, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 283 (2020), 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.025
[18]	M. Tavana, K. Govindan, A. K. Nasr, M. S. Heidary, H. Mina, A mathematical programming approach for equitable COVID-19 vaccine distribution in developing countries, Ann. Oper. Res., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04130-z doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-04130-z
[19]	M. Rastegar, M. Tavana, A. Meraj, H. Mina, An inventory-location optimization model for equitable influenza vaccine distribution in developing countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, Vaccine, 39 (2021), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.022 doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.022
[20]	Z. Liu, R. Huang, S. Shao, Data-driven two-stage fuzzy random mixed integer optimization model for facility location problems under uncertain environment, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 13292–13312. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022734 doi: 10.3934/math.2022734
[21]	M. M. Miah, A. AlArjani, A. Rashid, A. R. Khan, M. S. Uddin, E.-A. Attia, Multi-objective optimization to the transportation problem considering non-linear fuzzy membership functions, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 10397–10419. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023527 doi: 10.3934/math.2023527
[22]	S. Kousar, M. N. Sangi, N. Kausar, D. Pamucar, E. Ozbilge, T. Cagin, Multi-objective optimization model for uncertain crop production under neutrosophic fuzzy environment: A case study, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 7584–7605. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023380 doi: 10.3934/math.2023380
[23]	S. Shiripour, N. Mahdavi-Amiri, Optimal distribution of the injured in a multi-type transportation network with damage-dependent travel times: Two metaheuristic approaches, Socioecon Plan. Sci., 68 (2019), 100660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.10.011
[24]	Z. Mahtab, A. Azeem, S. M. Ali, S. K. Paul, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, Multi-objective robust-stochastic optimisation of relief goods distribution under uncertainty: a real-life case study, Int. J. Syst. Sci. Oper. Logist., 9 (2021), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2021.1879305
[25]	A. K. Mollah, S. Sadhukhan, P. Das, M. Z. Anis, A cost optimization model and solutions for shelter allocation and relief distribution in flood scenario, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 31 (2018), 1187–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.018
[26]	Y. Chen, P. R. Tadikamalla, J. Shang, Y. Song, Supply allocation: Bi-level programming and differential evolution algorithm for Natural Disaster Relief, Cluster Comput., 23 (2017), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1366-6 doi: 10.1007/s10586-017-1366-6
[27]	A. S. Safaei, S. Farsad, M. M. Paydar, Robust bi-level optimization of relief logistics operations, Appl. Math. Model., 56 (2018), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.003
[28]	S. Saranwong, C. Likasiri, Product distribution via a bi-level programming approach: Algorithms and a case study in municipal waste system, Expert Syst. Appl., 44 (2016), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.053 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.053
[29]	A. S. Safaei, S. Farsad, M. M. Paydar, Emergency logistics planning under supply risk and demand uncertainty, Oper. Res., 20 (2020), 1437–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0376-3 doi: 10.1007/s12351-018-0376-3
[30]	J.-F. Camacho-Vallejo, E. González-Rodríguez, F.-J. Almaguer, R. G. González-Ramírez, A bi-level optimization model for aid distribution after the occurrence of a disaster, J. Clean Prod., 105 (2015), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.069
[31]	I. Shokr, F. Jolai, A. Bozorgi-Amiri, A novel humanitarian and private sector relief chain network design model for disaster response, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 65 (2021), 102522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102522
[32]	C. Cao, Y. Liu, O. Tang, X. Gao, A fuzzy bi-level optimization model for multi-period post-disaster relief distribution in sustainable humanitarian supply chains, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 235 (2021), 108081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108081 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108081
[33]	X. Gao, A bi-level stochastic optimization model for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in disaster response, Ann. Oper. Res., 319 (2022), 115–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03506-6 doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03506-6
[34]	X. Li, M. Ramshani, Y. Huang, Cooperative maximal covering models for humanitarian relief chain management, Comput. Ind. Eng., 119 (2018), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.004
[35]	X. Gao, X. Jin, P. Zheng, C. Cui, Multi-modal transportation planning for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in humanitarian logistics, Adv. Eng. Informatics, 47 (2021), 101223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101223 doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101223
[36]	X. Gao, G. Huang, Q. Zhao, C. Cao, H. Jiang, Robust optimization model for medical staff rebalancing problem with data contamination during COVID-19 pandemic, Int. J. Prod. Res., 60 (2021), 1737–1766. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1995793 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1995793
[37]	S. Khanchehzarrin, M. Ghaebi Panah, N. Mahdavi-Amiri, S. Shiripour, A bi-level multi-objective location-routing optimization model for disaster relief operations considering public donations, Socioecon Plan. Sci., 80 (2022), 101165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101165 doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101165
[38]	I. M. Hezam, COVID-19 Global Humanitarian Response Plan: An optimal distribution model for high-priority countries, ISA Trans., 124 (2022), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.04.006 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2021.04.006
[39]	M. Besançon, M. F. Anjos, L. Brotcorne, Complexity of near-optimal robust versions of multilevel optimization problems, Optim. Lett., 15 (2021), 2597–2610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-021-01754-9 doi: 10.1007/s11590-021-01754-9
[40]	A. Caprara, M. Carvalho, A. Lodi, G. J. Woeginger, A Study on the Computational Complexity of the Bilevel Knapsack Problem, SIAM J. Optim., 24 (2014), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1137/130906593 doi: 10.1137/130906593

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)