
The Moreno-García cosine product is extended to evaluate an extensive number of trigonometric products previously published. The products are taken over finite and infinite domains defined in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function, which can be simplified to composite functions in special cases of integer values of the parameters involved. The results obtained include generalizations of finite and infinite products cosine functions, in certain cases raised to a complex number power.
Citation: Robert Reynolds. Extended Moreno-García cosine products[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3049-3063. doi: 10.3934/math.2023157
[1] | Robert Reynolds, Allan Stauffer . Extended Prudnikov sum. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18576-18586. doi: 10.3934/math.20221021 |
[2] | Robert Reynolds . A short note on a extended finite secant series. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26882-26895. doi: 10.3934/math.20231376 |
[3] | Mohamed Akel, Muajebah Hidan, Salah Boulaaras, Mohamed Abdalla . On the solutions of certain fractional kinetic matrix equations involving Hadamard fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15520-15531. doi: 10.3934/math.2022850 |
[4] | Maolin Cheng, Bin Liu . A novel method for calculating the contribution rates of economic growth factors. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18339-18353. doi: 10.3934/math.2023932 |
[5] | Robert Reynolds, Allan Stauffer . Definite integral of the logarithm hyperbolic secant function in terms of the Hurwitz zeta function. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1324-1331. doi: 10.3934/math.2021082 |
[6] | Taekyun Kim, Hye Kyung Kim, Dae San Kim . Some identities on degenerate hyperbolic functions arising from $ p $-adic integrals on $ \mathbb{Z}_p $. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25443-25453. doi: 10.3934/math.20231298 |
[7] | Robert Reynolds, Allan Stauffer . A quintuple integral involving the product of Hermite polynomial $ H_{n}(\beta x) $ and parabolic cylinder function $ D_{v}(\alpha t) $: derivation and evaluation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7464-7470. doi: 10.3934/math.2022418 |
[8] | Robert Reynolds, Allan Stauffer . Derivation of logarithmic integrals expressed in teams of the Hurwitz zeta function. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7252-7258. doi: 10.3934/math.2020463 |
[9] | Zhenjiang Pan, Zhengang Wu . The inverse of tails of Riemann zeta function, Hurwitz zeta function and Dirichlet L-function. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16564-16585. doi: 10.3934/math.2024803 |
[10] | A. Belafhal, N. Nossir, L. Dalil-Essakali, T. Usman . Integral transforms involving the product of Humbert and Bessel functions and its application. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1260-1274. doi: 10.3934/math.2020086 |
The Moreno-García cosine product is extended to evaluate an extensive number of trigonometric products previously published. The products are taken over finite and infinite domains defined in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function, which can be simplified to composite functions in special cases of integer values of the parameters involved. The results obtained include generalizations of finite and infinite products cosine functions, in certain cases raised to a complex number power.
Moreno et al. [1] published work involved in the evaluation of infinite products similar to the work previously published by Viète in 1593, which was based on geometric considerations [2,3]. A detailed compendium, with analysis and evaluations of infinite products of elementary functions in terms of trigonometric functions, is found in the book by Remmert [4]. Published work featuring sums and products of well-known functions such as Apostol-Bernoulli and Apostol-Euler numbers are detailed in [5,6,7].
This article develops and evaluates a number of Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function-based finite and infinite series and products. The sum and product of this special function are calculated using the contour integral method given in [8]. The work in this article should encourage readers and their students to look for more proofs of these sums and proofs for related series and products, as well as serve as an example of one of several strategies for dealing with formulae of this nature. The derivation of interesting sums and products of finite and infinite series, as well as special instances for both types, are provided, along with plots in Figures 1–4.
The published work in [9] featured the contour integral method in [8] applied to the product of the cosine and cosecant functions and used to derive a finite sum involving the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function, where the first and third parameters involved powers of 2. In this current paper, we use the contour integral method in [8] and apply it to the difference method on page 131 in [10] for projection and finite series involving the Tangent function. This application yields both a finite and infinite sum of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function. A definite integral of an infinite product for Catalan's constant K is also derived.
Some special cases evaluated are in terms of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers which have numerous applications throughout algebraic coding theory, linear sequential circuits, quasicrystals, phyllotaxies, biomathematics, and computer science.
Our preliminaries start with a contour integral method and a few formulae. Let a, k, m, α, β and w be general complex numbers and j∈[0,∞), the contour integral forms [8] of the Durell-like sum in [10] are given by
12πi∫Cn∑j=0awβ1−jw−k−1tan(α1−j(m+w))−awβ−jw−k−1tan(α−j(m+w))=12πi∫Cβaww−k−1tan(α(m+w))−aww−k−1β−ntan((m+w)α−n)dw, | (1.1) |
and
12πi∫C∞∑j=0awβ1−jw−k−1tan(α1−j(m+w))−awβ−jw−k−1tan(α−j(m+w))=12πi∫Cβaww−k−1tan(α(m+w))dw. | (1.2) |
The derivations follow the method used by us in [8]. This method involves using a form of the generalized Cauchy's integral formula given by
ykΓ(k+1)=12πi∫Cewywk+1dw, | (1.3) |
where y,w∈C and C is in general an open contour in the complex plane where the bilinear concomitant [8] has the same value at the end points of the contour. This method involves using a form of Eq (1.3) then multiplies both sides by a function, then takes the sum of both sides. This yields a sum in terms of a contour integral. Then, multiply both sides of Eq (1.3) by another function and take the infinite sum of both sides such that the contour integral of both equations are the same.
Use Eq (1.11.3) in [11] where Φ(z,s,v) is the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function which is a generalization of the Hurwitz Zeta ζ(s,v) and Polylogarithm functions Lin(z). The Lerch function has a series representation given by
Φ(z,s,v)=∞∑n=0(v+n)−szn | (2.1) |
where |z|<1,v≠0,−1,−2,−3,.., and is continued analytically by its integral representation given by
Φ(z,s,v)=1Γ(s)∫∞0ts−1e−vt1−ze−tdt=1Γ(s)∫∞0ts−1e−(v−1)tet−zdt | (2.2) |
where Re(v)>0, and either |z|≤1,z≠1,Re(s)>0, or z=1,Re(s)>1.
In this section, the Cauchy integral formula is use and the stated contour integral method to derive the finite sum of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta functions in terms of its contour integral representation (1.1).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a)+2iα1−j+2iyα1−j then multiply both sides by −2i(−1)yβ1−je2im(y+1)α1−j and take the infinite sums over y∈[0,∞) and j∈[0,n] and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function to get
−n∑j=0i2k+1 β1−j (iα1−j )k e2imα1−j Φ(−e2imα1−j ,−k,1−12iαj−1log (a))Γ(k+1)=−12πin∑j=0∞∑y=0∫C2i(−1)yawβ1−jw−k−1e2i(y+1)α1−j(m+w)dw=−12πi∫Cn∑j=0∞∑y=02i(−1)yawβ1−jw−k−1e2i(y+1)α1−j(m+w)dw=12πi∫Cn∑j=0(awβ1−jw−k−1tan(α1−j(m+w))−iawβ1−jw−k−1)dw | (3.1) |
from Eq (1.232.1) in [12] where Re(m+w)>0 and Im(m+w)>0 in order for the sums to converge. Apply Tonelli's theorem for multiple sums, see page 177 in [13] as the summands are of bounded measure over the space C×[0,n]×[0,∞).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a) then multiply both sides by −iβ1−j and simplify to get
−iβ1−jlogk(a)Γ(k+1)=−12πi∫Ciawβ1−jw−k−1dw | (3.2) |
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a)+2iα−j+2iyα−j then multiply both sides by 2iβ−jei(2m(y+1)α−j+πy) and take the infinite sums over y∈[0,∞) and j∈[0,n] and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function to get
n∑j=0i2k+1β−j(iα−j)ke2imα−jΦ(−e2imα−j,−k,1−12iαjlog(a))Γ(k+1)=12πin∑j=0∞∑y=0∫C2iawβ−jw−k−1ei(2(y+1)α−j(m+w)+πy)dw=12πi∫Cn∑j=0∞∑y=02iawβ−jw−k−1ei(2(y+1)α−j(m+w)+πy)dw=−12πi∫Cn∑j=0(awβ−jw−k−1tan(α−j(m+w))+iawβ−jw−k−1)dw | (3.3) |
from Eq (1.232.1) in [12] where Re(m+w)>0 and Im(m+w)>0 in order for the sums to converge. Apply Tonelli's theorem for multiple sums, see page 177 in [13] as the summands are of bounded measure over the space C×[0,n]×[0,∞).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a) then multiply both sides by iβ−j and simplify to get
iβ−jlogk(a)Γ(k+1)=12πi∫Ciawβ−jw−k−1dw | (3.4) |
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→2iα+log(a)+2iαy then multiply both sides by −2iβei(2αm(y+1)+πy) and take the infinite sums over y∈[0,∞) and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function to get
−iβ2k+1(iα)ke2iαmΦ(−e2imα,−k,1−ilog(a)2α)Γ(k+1)=−12πi∞∑y=0∫C2iβaww−k−1ei(2α(y+1)(m+w)+πy)dw=−12πi∫C∞∑y=02iβaww−k−1ei(2α(y+1)(m+w)+πy)dw=12πi∫C(βaww−k−1tan(α(m+w))−iβaww−k−1)dw | (3.5) |
from Eq (1.232.1) in [12] where Re(m+w)>0 and Im(m+w)>0 in order for the sum to converge. Apply Fubini's theorem for integrals and sums, see page 178 in [13] as the summand is of bounded measure over the space C×[0,∞).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a) then multiply both sides by −iβ and simplify to get
−iβlogk(a)Γ(k+1)=−12πi∫Ciβaww−k−1dw | (3.6) |
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a)+2iα−n+2iyα−n then multiply both sides by −2iβ−nei(2m(y+1)α−n+πy) and take the infinite sums over y∈[0,∞) and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function to get
−i2k+1β−n(iα−n)ke2imα−nΦ(−e2imα−n,−k,1−12iαnlog(a))Γ(k+1)=−12πi∞∑y=0∫C2iaww−k−1β−nei(2(y+1)(m+w)α−n+πy)dw=−12πi∫C∞∑y=02iaww−k−1β−nei(2(y+1)(m+w)α−n+πy)dw=12πi∫C(aww−k−1β−ntan((m+w)α−n)−iaww−k−1β−n)dw | (3.7) |
from Eq (1.232.1) in [12] where Re(m+w)>0 and Im(m+w)>0 in order for the sum to converge. Apply Fubini's theorem for integrals and sums, see page 178 in [13] as the summand is of bounded measure over the space C×[0,∞).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a) and multiply both sides by −iβ−n then simplify to get
−iβ−nlogk(a)Γ(k+1)=−12πi∫Ciaww−k−1β−ndw | (3.8) |
In this section, the Cauchy integral formula is used and the stated contour integral method to derive the infinite sum of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta functions in terms of its contour integral representation (1.2).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a)+2iα1−j+2iyα1−j then multiply both sides by −2i(−1)yβ1−je2im(y+1)α1−j and take the infinite sums over y∈[0,∞) and j∈[0,∞) and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function to get
−∞∑j=0i2k+1 β1−j (iα1−j )k e2imα1−j Φ(−e2imα1−j ,−k,1−12iαj−1log(a))Γ(k+1)=−12πi∞∑j=0∞∑y=0∫C2i(−1)yawβ1−jw−k−1e2i(y+1)α1−j(m+w)dw=−12πi∫C∞∑j=0∞∑y=02i(−1)yawβ1−jw−k−1e2i(y+1)α1−j(m+w)dw=12πi∫C∞∑j=0(awβ1−jw−k−1tan(α1−j(m+w))−iawβ1−jw−k−1)dw | (4.1) |
from Eq (1.232.1) in [12] where Re(m+w)>0 and Im(m+w)>0 in order for the sums to converge. Apply Tonelli's theorem for multiple sums, see page 177 in [13] as the summands are of bounded measure over the space C×[0,∞)×[0,∞).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a) then multiply both sides by −iβ1−j and simplify to get
−iβ1−jlogk(a)Γ(k+1)=−12πi∫Ciawβ1−jw−k−1dw | (4.2) |
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a)+2iα−j+2iyα−j then multiply both sides by 2iβ−jei(2m(y+1)α−j+πy) and take the infinite sums over y∈[0,∞) and j∈[0,∞) and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function to get
∞∑j=0i2k+1β−j(iα−j)ke2imα−jΦ(−e2imα−j,−k,1−12iαjlog(a))Γ(k+1)=12πi∞∑j=0∞∑y=0∫C2iawβ−jw−k−1ei(2(y+1)α−j(m+w)+πy)dw=12πi∫C∞∑j=0∞∑y=02iawβ−jw−k−1ei(2(y+1)α−j(m+w)+πy)dw=−12πi∫C∞∑j=0(awβ−jw−k−1tan(α−j(m+w))+iawβ−jw−k−1)dw | (4.3) |
from Eq (1.232.1) in [12] where Re(m+w)>0 and Im(m+w)>0 in order for the sums to converge. Apply Tonelli's theorem for multiple sums, see page 177 in [13] as the summands are of bounded measure over the space C×[0,∞)×[0,∞).
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a) then multiply both sides by iβ−j and simplify to get
iβ−jlogk(a)Γ(k+1)=12πi∫Ciawβ−jw−k−1dw | (4.4) |
Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→2iα+log(a)+2iαy then multiply both sides by −2iβei(2αm(y+1)+πy) and take the infinite sums over y∈[0,∞) and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function to get
−iβ2k+1(iα)ke2iαm Φ(−e2imα,−k,1−ilog(a)2α )Γ(k+1)=−12πi∞∑y=0∫C2iβaww−k−1ei(2α(y+1)(m+w)+πy)dw=−12πi∫C∞∑y=02iβaww−k−1ei(2α(y+1)(m+w)+πy)dw=12πi∫C(βaww−k−1tan(α(m+w))−iβaww−k−1)dw | (4.5) |
from Eq (1.232.1) in [12] where Re(m+w)>0 and Im(m+w)>0 in order for the sum to converge. Apply Fubini's theorem for integrals and sums, see page 178 in [13] as the summand is of bounded measure over the space C×[0,∞). Using a generalization of Cauchy's integral formula (1.3), first replace y→log(a) then multiply both sides by −iβ and simplify to get
−iβlogk(a)Γ(k+1)=−12πi∫Ciβaww−k−1dw | (4.6) |
In this section, the main theorems are developed and used in this work to evaluate special cases and produce double sum formulae and a table of infinite products of trigonometric functions. Possible application of the infinite form given by Eq (5.2) is in the evaluation of the analytic solution of the imaginary part of Eq (34) in [14]. Possible application of the finite form given by Eq (5.1) is in the evaluation of the Eq (2) in [15].
Theorem 5.1. For all k,a,α,β,m∈C,n∈Z+,
n∑j=0(−i2k+1β1−j(iα1−j)ke2imα1−jΦ(−e2imα1−j,−k,1−12iαj−1log(a))+i2k+1β−j(iα−j)ke2imα−jΦ(−e2imα−j,−k,1−12iαjlog(a))+iβ1−jlogk(a)−iβ−jlogk(a))=−iβ2k+1(iα)ke2iαmΦ(−e2imα,−k,1−ilog(a)2α)−i2k+1β−n(iα−n)ke2imα−nΦ(−e2imα−n,−k,1−12iαnlog(a))+iβlogk(a)+iβ−nlogk(a) | (5.1) |
Proof. Since the addition of the right-hand sides of Eqs (3.1)–(3.4), is equivalent to the addition of the right-hand sides of Eqs (3.5)–(3.8) one may equate the left-hand sides and apply Eq (1.1) and simplify the Gamma function to yield the stated result.
Theorem 5.2. For all k,a,α,β,m∈C,
∞∑j=0(−i2k+1β1−j(iα1−j)ke2imα1−jΦ(−e2imα1−j,−k,1−12iαj−1log(a))+i2k+1β−j(iα−j)ke2imα−jΦ(−e2imα−j,−k,1−12iαjlog(a))+iβ1−jlogk(a)−iβ−jlogk(a))=iβlogk(a)−iβ2k+1(iα)ke2iαmΦ(−e2imα,−k,1−ilog(a)2α) | (5.2) |
Proof. Since the addition of the right-hand sides of Eqs (4.1)–(4.4), is equivalent to the addition of the right-hand sides of Eqs (4.5) and (4.6), may equate the left-hand sides and apply Eq (1.2) and simplify the Gamma function to yield the stated result.
Example 6.1.
n∑j=0β−j(βtan(mα1−j)−tan(mα−j))=βtan(αm)+β−ntan(mα−n) | (6.1) |
Proof. Use Eq (5.1) and set k=0 and simplify using entry (2) in table of Section (64:12) in [16].
∞∑j=0β−j(βtan(mα1−j)−tan(mα−j))=βtan(αm) | (6.2) |
Proof. Use Eq (5.2) and set k=0 and simplify using entry (2) in table of Section (64:12) in [16].
In this section, Eqs (5.1) and (5.2) will be evaluated to derive infinite and finite product representations for the quotient of the cosine function raised to a complex power. The comparison to the derived results with those published by Moreno et al. [1] as in some cases more generalized formulae were achieved. We also provide plots of special cases in Figures 1–4.
Example 7.1.
n∏j=0(cos(mα1−j )cos(rα1−j ) )2α−1+j β1−j(cos(rα−j )cos(mα−j ) )2αjβ−j=(cos(mα)cos(rα) )2βα(cos(mα−n )cos(rα−n ) )2αnβ−n | (7.1) |
Proof. Use Eq (5.1) and form a second equation by replacing m by r and take their difference and set k=−1,a=1 and apply the method in section (8) in [17] then simplify using entry (3) in table of Section (64:12) in [16]. The final form is derived by multiplying itself after replacing m→−m,r→−r and simplifying.
Example 7.2. Lucas numbers and golden ratio over complex numbers where Re(α)>Re(β)>1.
(cos(15π2−n−1α−n−1)sec(π2−nα−n−1))−2n+1 αn β−n×n∏j=02βα(cos(π2−jα−j−1)sec(15π2−j−1α−j−1))2j+1 αj β−j(cos(15π2−jα−j)sec(π21−jα−j))2j αj−1 β1−j=(12(1+√5))βα | (7.2) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.1) and set m→π10α,r→πα and simplify. The Lucas numbers are listed in equation (3.1.2.6) in [18].
Example 7.3.
(cos(15π2−nα−n−1)sec(π2−nα−n−1))−2n+1 αn β−n×n∏j=0(−2)βα(cos(π2−jα−j−1)sec(15π2−jα−j−1))2j+1 αj β−j(cos(15π21−jα−j)sec(π21−jα−j))2j αj−1 β1−j=(12(1−√5))βα | (7.3) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.1) and set m→π5α,r→πα and simplify. The Lucas numbers are listed in Eq (3.1.2.6) in [18].
Example 7.4. Infinite product in terms of quotient cosine functions with reciprocal angles and symmetric plots.
∞∏j=0(cos(mα1−j )cos(rα1−j ) )2βα(αβ )j(cos(rα−j )cos(mα−j ) )2(αβ )j=(cos(mα)cos(rα) )2βα | (7.4) |
Proof. Use Eq (5.2) and form a second equation by replacing m by r and take their difference and set k=−1,a=1 and apply the method in section (8) in [17] then simplify using entry (3) in table of Section (64:12) in [16]. The final form is derived by multiplying itself after replacing m→−m,r→−r and simplifying.
Example 7.5. Product representation for the reciprocal of the Pythagoras constant given by 1√2 given in [19].
∞∏j=0(cos(π2−2(j+1))sec(π4−j3))22j+1 3−j(cos(13π41−j)sec(π4−j))22j−1 31−j=12√2 | (7.5) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set m→π3,r→π4,α→4,β→3 and simplify.
Example 7.6. Product representation for the constant √5.
∞∏j=0(cos(13π2−j−1)sec(π2−j5))2j+1 3−j(cos(15π21−j)sec(π2−j3))2j 31−j=√5−2 | (7.6) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set m→π5,r→π6,α→2,β→3 and simplify.
Example 7.7. Product representation for the golden ratio where the constant ϕ=12(1+√5) is given by Eq (3.1.2.3) in [18].
−∞∏j=0(cos(π2−j3)sec(15π2−j−1))2j+1(cos(π2−j5)sec(13π21−j))2j=12(1+√5) | (7.7) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set m→π10,r→π3,β→1,α→2 and simplify.
Example 7.8. Product representation for the golden ration raised to a complex power.
∞∏j=02βα(cos(π2−jα−j−1)sec(15π2−j−1α−j−1))2j+1 (αβ)j(cos(15π2−jα−j)sec(π21−jα−j))2j(αβ)j−1=(12(1+√5))βα | (7.8) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set m→π5α,r→2πα and then α→2α and simplify.
Example 7.9. Product representation for the golden ration raised to a complex power.
∞∏j=0(−2)βα(cos(π2−jα−j−1)sec(15π2−jα−j−1))2j+1 (αβ)j(cos(15π21−jα−j)sec(π21−jα−j))β2j(αβ)jα=(12(1−√5))βα | (7.9) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set m→2π5α,r→2πα and then α→2α and simplify.
Example 7.10. Product representation for the quotient of radicals √2 and √5.
∞∏j=0(cos(11521−2j π )cos(152−3−2j π ))2−1+2j(cos(152−5−2j π )cos(1152−1−2j π ))21+2j=√1+√5+√30−6√5(−1+√2)√2+√2(−1+√5)+(1+√2)√2(2−√2)(5+√5) | (7.10) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set m→π30,r→π160,α→4,β→1 and simplify.
Example 7.11. Product representation for the quotient of cosine functions.
∞∏j=0(cos(2−1−j rβ−1−j )cos(2−1−j mβ−1−j ) )21+j(cos(2−j mβ−j )cos(2−j rβ−j ) )2j=cos(m)cos(r) | (7.11) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set α→2β,m→m2β,r→r2β and simplify.
Example 7.12. A product representation for the cosine function.
∞∏j=0cos2j(2−j z )cos21+j (2−1−j z )=cos(z) | (7.12) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set r→0,α→2,m→z2,β→1 and simplify. This is an alternate representation to the Euler product representation in Chapter 1. Section (3.1) in [4].
Example 7.13. A product representation for the secant function.
∞∏j=0 cos21+j(2−1−j z )cos2j(2−j z )=sec(z) | (7.13) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set m→0,α→2,r→z2,β→1 and simplify.
Example 7.14. Product representation for the square root of the quotient of cosine functions.
∞∏j=0(cos(4−1−j rβ−1−j )cos(4−1−j mβ−1−j ) )21+2j(cos(4−j mβ−j )cos(4−j rβ−j ) )2−1+2j=√cos(m)cos(r) | (7.14) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set α→4β,m→m4β,r→r4β and simplify.
Example 7.15. Alternate product representation for Eq (13) in [1].
∞∏j=0cosh2j(2−1−j log(3))cosh21+j (2−2−j log(3))=2√3 | (7.15) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.12) and set z→−cos−1(2√3) and simplify.
Example 7.16. Generalized product representation for Theorem 4 in [1].
∞∏j=0(cos(352−2−j πβ−1−j )cos(2−1−j xβ−1−j ) )21+j(cos(2−j xβ−j )cos(352−1−j πβ−j ) )2j=2√2cos(x)√5−√5 | (7.16) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.4) and set α→2β,m→m2β,r→r2β and simplify followed by setting m→x,r→3π10 and simplify.
Example 7.17. Generalized product representation for Theorem 5 in [1].
∞∏j=0(cos(2−j β−jcos−1(√1−z24 ) )cos(352−1−j πβ−j ) )2j(cos(352−2−j πβ−1−j )cos(2−1−j β−1−jcos−1(√1−z24 ) ) )21+j=√2√−4+z2−5+√5 | (7.17) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.11) and set m→cos−1(√1−z24),r→3π10 and simplify.
Example 7.18. Definite integral of an infinite product in terms of Catalan's constant K.
∫∞0t∞∏j=0cosh21+j (2−1−j tβ−1−j )cosh2j (2−j tβ−j )dt=∫∞0tcosh(t)dt=2K | (7.18) |
Proof. Use Eq (7.11) and set m→0,r→it then multiply both sides by t and take the infinite integral over t∈[0,∞) and simplify using Eq (3.521.2) in [12].
In this paper, we have presented a method for deriving new finite and infinite products involving the cosine function along with some interesting special cases using contour integration. We hope that our approach will be helpful for those interested readers who want to obtain their own product formulae. The results presented were numerically verified for real, imaginary and complex values of the parameters in the products using Mathematica by Wolfram.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
[1] |
S. G. Moreno, E. M. García, New infinite products of cosines and Viète-like formulae, Mathematics Magazine, 86 (2013), 15–25. http://doi.org/10.4169/math.mag.86.1.015 doi: 10.4169/math.mag.86.1.015
![]() |
[2] | F. Viète, Variorum de Rebus Mathematicis Responsorum Liber VIII, Capvt XVIII, 1593,398–400. |
[3] | L. Berggren, J. Borwein, P. Borwein, Pi: a source book, 3 Eds., New York: Springer, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4217-6 |
[4] | R. Remmert, Classical topics in complex function theory, New York: Springer, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2956-6 |
[5] |
A. Bayad, T. Kim, Higher recurrences for Apostol-Bernoulli-Euler numbers, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 19 (2012), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920812010013 doi: 10.1134/S1061920812010013
![]() |
[6] |
V. Gupta, T. Kim, On a q-analog of the Baskakov basis functions, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 20 (2013), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920813030035 doi: 10.1134/S1061920813030035
![]() |
[7] |
T. Kim, D. S. Kim, Note on the degenerate gamma function, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 27 (2020), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920820030061 doi: 10.1134/S1061920820030061
![]() |
[8] |
R. Reynolds, A. Stauffer, A method for evaluating definite integrals in terms of special functions with examples, International Mathematical Forum, 15 (2020), 235–244. http://doi.org/10.12988/imf.2020.91272 doi: 10.12988/imf.2020.91272
![]() |
[9] |
R. Reynolds, A. Stauffer, Extended Prudnikov sum, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 18576–18586. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221021 doi: 10.3934/math.20221021
![]() |
[10] | C. V. Durell, A. Robson, Advanced trigonometry, Dover Publications, 2003. |
[11] | A. Erdéyli, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F. G. Tricomi, Higher transcendental functions, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., 1953. |
[12] | I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Tables of integrals, series and products, Cambridge: Academic Press, 2000. |
[13] | R. Gelca, T. Andreescu, Putnam and beyond, Cham: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58988-6 |
[14] |
S. Khan, S. Zaman, S. Ul-Islam, Approximation of Cauchy-type singular integrals with high frequency Fourier kernel, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 130 (2021), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.05.017 doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.05.017
![]() |
[15] |
S. Khan, S. Zaman, M. Arshad, H. Kang, H. H. Shah, A. Issakhov, A well- conditioned and efficient Levin method for highly oscillatory integrals with compactly supported radial basis functions, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 131 (2021), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.06.012 doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.06.012
![]() |
[16] | K. Oldham, J. Myland, J. Spanier, An atlas of functions: with equator, the atlas function calculator, New York: Springer, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48807-3 |
[17] |
R. Reynolds, A. Stauffer, A note on the infinite sum of the Lerch function, Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math., 15 (2022), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v15i1.4137 doi: 10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v15i1.4137
![]() |
[18] | K. H. Rosen, J. G. Michaels, J. L. Gross, J. W. Grossman, D. R. Shier, Handbook of discrete and combinatorial mathematics, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000. |
[19] | C. C. Clawson, Mathematical sorcery: revealing the secrets of numbers, New York: Springer, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6433-5 |