Research article

On concurrent vector fields on Riemannian manifolds

  • Received: 09 June 2023 Revised: 12 August 2023 Accepted: 22 August 2023 Published: 29 August 2023
  • MSC : 53C15, 53C40

  • It is shown that the presence of a non-zero concurrent vector field on a Riemannian manifold poses an obstruction to its topology as well as certain aspects of its geometry. It is shown that on a compact Riemannian manifold, there does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field. Also, it is shown that a Riemannian manifold of non-zero constant scalar curvature does not admit a non-zero concurrent vector field. It is also shown that a non-zero concurrent vector field annihilates de-Rham Laplace operator. Finally, we find a characterization of a Euclidean space using a non-zero concurrent vector field on a complete and connected Riemannian manifold.

    Citation: Amira Ishan. On concurrent vector fields on Riemannian manifolds[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 25097-25103. doi: 10.3934/math.20231281

    Related Papers:

    [1] Nasser Bin Turki, Sharief Deshmukh, Olga Belova . A note on closed vector fields. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1509-1522. doi: 10.3934/math.2024074
    [2] Sharief Deshmukh, Mohammed Guediri . Characterizations of Euclidean spheres. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7733-7740. doi: 10.3934/math.2021449
    [3] Hamed Faraji, Shahroud Azami, Ghodratallah Fasihi-Ramandi . h-Almost Ricci solitons with concurrent potential fields. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4220-4228. doi: 10.3934/math.2020269
    [4] Sharief Deshmukh, Mohammed Guediri . Some new characterizations of spheres and Euclidean spaces using conformal vector fields. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28765-28777. doi: 10.3934/math.20241395
    [5] Ghodratallah Fasihi-Ramandi, Hajar Ghahremani-Gol . Some geometric vector fields on 5-dimensional 2-step homogeneous nilmanifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 546-556. doi: 10.3934/math.2020036
    [6] Nasser Bin Turki, Sharief Deshmukh . Sufficient conditions for triviality of Ricci solitons. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1346-1357. doi: 10.3934/math.2024066
    [7] Yanlin Li, Nasser Bin Turki, Sharief Deshmukh, Olga Belova . Euclidean hypersurfaces isometric to spheres. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28306-28319. doi: 10.3934/math.20241373
    [8] Hanan Alohali, Sharief Deshmukh . Some generic hypersurfaces in a Euclidean space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15008-15023. doi: 10.3934/math.2024727
    [9] George Rosensteel . Differential geometry of collective models. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 215-230. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.215
    [10] Mohammed Guediri, Sharief Deshmukh . Hypersurfaces in a Euclidean space with a Killing vector field. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1899-1910. doi: 10.3934/math.2024093
  • It is shown that the presence of a non-zero concurrent vector field on a Riemannian manifold poses an obstruction to its topology as well as certain aspects of its geometry. It is shown that on a compact Riemannian manifold, there does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field. Also, it is shown that a Riemannian manifold of non-zero constant scalar curvature does not admit a non-zero concurrent vector field. It is also shown that a non-zero concurrent vector field annihilates de-Rham Laplace operator. Finally, we find a characterization of a Euclidean space using a non-zero concurrent vector field on a complete and connected Riemannian manifold.



    Recall that if the holonomy group of a Riemannian manifold (M,g) leaves invariant a point of M, then there exists a vector field ξ on M that satisfies

    Tξ=TTX(M), (1.1)

    where is the Riemannian connection and X(M) is the Lie algebra of smooth vector fields on M (cf. [12]). The vector field ξ satisfying (1.1) is called a concurrent vector field on the Riemannian manifold (M,g). The influence of a concurrent vector field on the geometry of a Riemannian manifold has been the subject of interest to many mathematicians (cf. [1,3,6,7,8,9,11,12,13,14]). In [13], the authors classified immersed submanifolds of the Euclidean space whose tangential component of the position vector field is a concurrent vector field. In [3], the authors studied Ricci solitons whose potential field is a concurrent vector field and have classified such Ricci solitons (cf. Theorem 3.1). Concurrent vector fields are not only important in geometry, they also have significance in physics (cf. [2,14,15]).

    In this short note, we are interested in two questions. The first is to study the obstruction to the topology of a Riemannian manifold (M,g) possessing a concurrent vector field. In our finding, we discover that a Riemannian manifold that admits a non-zero concurrent vector field cannot be compact (cf. Theorem 3.1). Note that on the Euclidean space (Rn,,) the position vector field is a non-zero concurrent vector field. We seek the question: does a Riemannian manifold with non-zero constant scalar curvature admit a non-zero concurrent vector field? We show in Theorem 3.2 that there does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field on a Riemannian manifold of non-zero constant scalar curvature. An interesting question in geometry is to find different characterizations of the Euclidean sapce. The second question we consider is, can we characterize a Euclidean space using a non-zero concurrent vector field? Finally, we find a characterization of a Euclidean space using a non-zero concurrent vector field on a complete and connected Riemannian manifold (cf. Theorem 4.1).

    Let ξ be a concurrent vector field on an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M,g). Then, using Eq (1.1), we have the following expression for the curvature tensor vector field

    R(T1,T2)ξ=T1T2ξT2T1ξ[T1,T2]ξ=0T1,T2X(M). (2.1)

    For a local orthonormal frame {t1,...,tn}, the Ricci tensor of (M,g) is given by

    Ric(T1,T2)=ni=1g(R(ti,T1)T2,ti).

    Therefore, using Eq (2.1), we have

    Ric(T,ξ)=0TX(M), (2.2)

    that is,

    Ric(ξ,ξ)=0. (2.3)

    The Ricci operator S of the Riemannian manifold (M,g) is a symmetric operator given by

    Ric(T1,T2)=g(ST1,T2)T1,T2X(M)

    and the scalar curvature τ of (M,g) is given by

    τ=ni=1Ric(ti,ti)=TrS.

    The gradient τ of the scalar curvature τ satisfies

    12τ=ni=1(S)(ti,ti), (2.4)

    where (S)(T1,T2)=T1ST2S(T1T2), T1,T2X(M).

    In this section, we find Riemannian manifolds on which concurrent vector fields does not exist. It is interesting to know that the topology of a Riemannian manifold (M,g) obstructs the existence of a concurrent vector field on (M,g).

    Theorem 3.1. There does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field on an n -dimensional compact Riemannian manifold (M,g), n>1.

    Proof. Let (M,g) be an n-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold, n>1. Suppose (M,g) admits a non-zero concurrent vector field ξ. Then, using Eq (1.1), we see that the Lie derivative of g with respect to ξ is given by

    (£ξg)(T1,T2)=2g(T1,T2),T1,T2X(M). (3.1)

    Choosing a local orthonormal frame {t1,...,tn}, using Eqs (1.1) and (3.1), we get

    divξ=ni=1g(tiξ,ti)=n, (3.2)
    ξ2=ni=1g(tiξ,tiξ)=n (3.3)

    and

    |£ξg|2=ni,j=1((£ξg)(ti,tj))2=4n. (3.4)

    Using the integral formula for compact Riemannian manifold (M,g) (cf. [14])

    M(Ric(ξ,ξ)+12|£ξg|2ξ2(divξ)2)=0

    and Eqs (2.3) and (3.2)–(3.4), we get

    Mn(n1)=0,

    a contradiction. Hence, there does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field on a compact Riemannian manifold.

    Note that the Euclidean space (Rn,,) is a space of constant scalar curvature (τ=0) and admits a non-zero concurrent vector field. A natural question is, whether a Riemannian manifold (M,g) of non-zero constant scalar curvature τ admits a non-zero concurrent vector field. Certainly by virtue of the above theorem, we see that the Riemannian product Sm(c1)×Sl(c2) does not admit a non-zero concurrent vector field. However, there are many Riemannian manifolds of non-zero constant scalar curvature such as the Riemannian product Sl(c)×Rm and certain warped product manifolds. In this respect we have the following:

    Theorem 3.2. There does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field on an n -dimensional Riemannian manifold (M,g), of non-zero constant scalar curvature.

    Proof. Let (M,g) be an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold of constant scalar curvature τ0. Suppose (M,g) admits a non-zero concurrent vector field ξ. Then, using Eq (2.2), we see that the Ricci operator S satisfies

    S(ξ)=0. (3.5)

    Using a local orthonormal frame {t1,...,tn} and symmetry of the Ricci operator S, Eqs (1.1) and (2.4), we have

    div(Sξ)=ni=1g(tiSξ,ti)=ni=1(tig(Sξ,ti)g(Sξ,titi))=ni=1(tig(ξ,Sti)g(ξ,Stiti))=ni=1(g(tiξ,Sti)+g(ξ,tiSti)g(ξ,S(titi)))=τ+g(ξ,12τ).

    Using Eq (3.5) and the fact that τ is a constant in above equation, we get τ=0, a contradiction. Hence, there does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field on a Riemannian manifold of non-zero constant scalar curvature.

    Note an n-dimensional Einstein manifold n>2 has constant scalar curvature. Consequently, by virtue of the above result, we have the following:

    Corollary. On an n-dimensional Einstein manifold n>2 with non-zero Ricci curvature, there does not exist a non-zero concurrent vector field.

    One of the important operators on a Riemannian manifold (M,g) is the de-Rham Laplace operator :X(M)X(M) defined by (cf. [4], p. 83)

    =S+Δ, (3.6)

    where Δ :X(M)X(M) is the rough Laplace operator defined by

    ΔT=ni=1(titiTtitiT)TX(M). (3.7)

    This operator is used for obtaining a characterization of a Killing vector field on a Riemannian manifold. In that the Kernal of the operator Ker defined by

    Ker={TX(M):T=0}

    is an important subspace of X(M) (cf. [5]).

    Recall that a subspace V of X(M) is said to be a nontrivial space if dimV1. Therefore, a subspace W of X(M) is trivial if W={0}. We have the following:

    Theorem 3.3. Let ξ be a non-zero concurrent vector field on an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M,g). Then, Ker is nontrivial subspace of X(M).

    Proof. Let (M,g) be an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold and ξ0 be the concurrent vector field on (M,g). Then, using Eqs (1.1) and (3.7), we have

    Δξ=ni=1(titiξtitiξ)=0.

    Thus, using Eqs (3.5) and (3.6) and above equation, we have

    ξ=0,

    that is, ξKer. Since ξ0, it proves that Ker is a nontrivial subspace.

    We know that the Euclidean space (Rn,,) possesses a non-zero concurrent vector field ξ=Ψ, where

    Ψ=ni=1uiui

    is the position vector field on Rn. One of interesting questions in differential geometry is to find a characterization of the spaces, the Euclidean sphere Sn(c) and the Euclidean space (Rn,,). In this section, we find a characterization of the Euclidean space using a non-zero concurrent vector field. Indeed we prove the following:

    Theorem 4.1. An n-dimensional complete and connected Riemannian manifold (M,g), n>1 admits a non-zero concurrent vector field, if and only if it is isometric to the Euclidean space (Rn,,).

    Proof. Let (M,g) be an n-dimensional complete and connected Riemannian manifold and ξ0 be a concurrent vector field on (M,g). Define the function f:MR by

    f=12g(ξ,ξ).

    Then, using Eq (1.1), we have

    T(f)=g(T,ξ)TX(M),

    which gives the gradient f of f as

    f=ξ. (4.1)

    By Eq (4.1), f is a non-constant function, owing to the fact ξ0. Taking covariant derivative in Eq (4.1) and using Eq (1.1), we conclude

    Tf=TTX(M). (4.2)

    Recall that the Hessian of f is defined by

    Hess(f)(T1,T2)=g(T1f,T2)T1,T2X(M),

    which in view of Eq (4.2), gives

    Hess(f)=g, (4.3)

    where f is a non-constant function. Recall that in [10], it is proved that a complete and connected n -dimensional Riemannian manifold (M,g) is isometric to an Euclidean space (Rn,,), if and only if there is a non-constant smooth function f:MR satisfying Hess(f)=cg for a nonzero constant c. Hence, by Eq (4.3), (M,g) is isometric to the Euclidean space (Rn,,) (cf. [10]). The converse is trivial.

    Remark. In [5], Chen has proved that there does not exist a concurrent vector field on a pseudo-Kaehler manifold of positive (or negative) Ricci curvature (cf. Proposition 3.2). Also, in the same paper, Chen proved tha if an Einstein pseudo-Kaehler manifold admits a concurrent vector field, then it is Ricci-flat (cf. Corollary 3.1). We have seen in the Corollary to Theorem 3.2 that on n-dimensional non-Ricci-flat Einstein manifolds n>2, there does not exist a concurrent vector field. It will be an interesting question to see whether such a result can be proved for quasi-Einstein spaces. We propose to take this question in our future studies.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The researcher would like to acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

    On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] B. Chen, K. Yano, On submanifolds of submanifolds of a Riemannian manifold, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 23 (1971), 548–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/02330548 doi: 10.2969/jmsj/02330548
    [2] B. Chen, A simple characterization of generalized Robertson-Walker spacetimes, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 46 (2014), 1833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-014-1833-9 doi: 10.1007/s10714-014-1833-9
    [3] B. Chen, Some results on concircular vector fields and their applications to Ricci solitons, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 52 (2015), 1535–1547. http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.2015.52.5.1535 doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2015.52.5.1535
    [4] B. Chen, Concircular vector fields and pseudo-Kaehlerian manifold, Kragujev. J. Math., 40 (2016), 7–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/KgJMath1601007C doi: 10.5937/KgJMath1601007C
    [5] K. Duggal, R. Sharma, Symmetries of spacetimes and Riemannian manifolds, New York: Springer Science, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5315-1
    [6] A. Fialkow, Conformal geodesics, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 45 (1939), 443–473.
    [7] A. Mihai, I. Mihai, Torse forming vector fields and exterior concurrent vector fields on Riemannian manifolds and applications, J. Geom. Phys., 73 (2013), 200–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.06.002
    [8] M. Petrovc, R. Rosca, L. Verstraelen, Exterior concurrent vector fields on Riemannian manifolds-Ⅰ: some general results, Soochow J. Math., 15 (1989), 179–187.
    [9] M. Petrovc, R. Rosca, L. Verstraelen, Exterior concurrent vector fields on Riemannian manifolds-Ⅱ: examples of exterior concurrent vector fields on manifolds, Soochow J. Math., 19 (1993), 357–368.
    [10] S. Pigola, M. Rimoldi, A. Setti, Remarks on non-compact gradient Ricci solitons, Math. Z., 268 (2011), 777–790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00209-010-0695-4 doi: 10.1007/s00209-010-0695-4
    [11] S. Sevinc, G. Sekerci, A. Coken, Some results about concircular and concurrent vector fields on Pseudo-Kaehler manifolds, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 766 (2016), 012034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/766/1/012034 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/766/1/012034
    [12] K. Yano, Sur le parallelisme et la concourance dans l'espace de Riemann, Proc. Imp. Acad., 19 (1943), 189–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3792/pia/1195573583 doi: 10.3792/pia/1195573583
    [13] K. Yano, B. Chen, On the concurrent vector fields of immersed manifolds, Kodai Math. Sem. Rep., 23 (1971), 343–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.2996/kmj/1138846372 doi: 10.2996/kmj/1138846372
    [14] K. Yano, Integral formulas in Riemannian geometry, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1970.
    [15] N. Youssef, S. Abed, A. Soleiman, Concurrent π -vector fields and energy β-change, Int. J. Geom. Methods M., 6 (2009), 1003–1031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219887809003904 doi: 10.1142/S0219887809003904
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1150) PDF downloads(42) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog