Computational simulation of cross-flow of Williamson fluid over a porous shrinking/stretching surface comprising hybrid nanofluid and thermal radiation

Umair Khan; Aurang Zaib; Sakhinah Abu Bakar; Anuar Ishak; Dumitru Baleanu; El-Sayed M Sherif; Umair Khan; Aurang Zaib; Sakhinah Abu Bakar; Anuar Ishak; Dumitru Baleanu; El-Sayed M Sherif

doi:10.3934/math.2022362

AIMS Mathematics

2022, Volume 7, Issue 4: 6489-6515. doi: 10.3934/math.2022362

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Computational simulation of cross-flow of Williamson fluid over a porous shrinking/stretching surface comprising hybrid nanofluid and thermal radiation

1.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
2.
Department of Mathematics and Social Sciences, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur 65200, Sindh, Pakistan
3.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science & Technology, Gulshan-e-Iqbal Karachi 75300, Pakistan
4.
Department of Mathematics, Cankaya University, Ankara 06790, Turkey
5.
Institute of Space Sciences, Magurele 077125, Romania
6.
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
7.
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11423, Saudi Arabia

Received: 26 November 2021 Revised: 28 December 2021 Accepted: 04 January 2022 Published: 20 January 2022
MSC : 76D05, 76A02, 65L10

Recent nanotechnology advancements have created a remarkable platform for the development of a better performance of ultrahigh coolant acknowledged as nanofluid for numerous industrial and engineering technologies. The current study aims to examine the boundary-layer cross-flow of Williamson fluid through a rotational stagnation point towards either a shrinking or stretching permeable wall incorporated by a hybrid nanofluid. The shape factors along with the radiation effect are also taken into account. The contained boundary layers are the type of stream-wise by shrinking/stretching process along with the sheet. Employing the suitable transformations, the partial differential equations (PDEs) are transmuted to similarity (ordinary) differential equations (ODEs). The transmuted system of ODEs is worked out by using a built-in package bvp4c in MATLAB for distinct values of pertaining parameters. Dual (first and second branch) outcomes are found for the shrinking surface. The results suggest that the inclusion of hybrid particles uplifts the drag force as well as the heat transfer in both solutions. In addition, the Weissenberg number accelerates the separation. Moreover, the effect of suction permits the friction factor and heat transfer to improve significantly at the porous shrinking/stretching sheet of hybrid nanofluid.

Keywords:

Citation: Umair Khan, Aurang Zaib, Sakhinah Abu Bakar, Anuar Ishak, Dumitru Baleanu, El-Sayed M Sherif. Computational simulation of cross-flow of Williamson fluid over a porous shrinking/stretching surface comprising hybrid nanofluid and thermal radiation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6489-6515. doi: 10.3934/math.2022362

Related Papers:

[1]	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Rasool Shah, Adnan Khan, Osama Y. Ababneh, Thongchai Botmart . Fractional view analysis of Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems with non-singular kernel derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18334-18359. doi: 10.3934/math.20221010
[2]	Ihsan Ullah, Aman Ullah, Shabir Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad, Taher A. Nofal . A survey of KdV-CDG equations via nonsingular fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18964-18981. doi: 10.3934/math.2023966
[3]	Saima Rashid, Rehana Ashraf, Fahd Jarad . Strong interaction of Jafari decomposition method with nonlinear fractional-order partial differential equations arising in plasma via the singular and nonsingular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7936-7963. doi: 10.3934/math.2022444
[4]	Aslı Alkan, Halil Anaç . The novel numerical solutions for time-fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation by using fractional natural transform decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25333-25359. doi: 10.3934/math.20241237
[5]	Rasool Shah, Abd-Allah Hyder, Naveed Iqbal, Thongchai Botmart . Fractional view evaluation system of Schrödinger-KdV equation by a comparative analysis. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19846-19864. doi: 10.3934/math.20221087
[6]	Khalid Khan, Amir Ali, Manuel De la Sen, Muhammad Irfan . Localized modes in time-fractional modified coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1580-1602. doi: 10.3934/math.2022092
[7]	Saima Rashid, Sobia Sultana, Bushra Kanwal, Fahd Jarad, Aasma Khalid . Fuzzy fractional estimates of Swift-Hohenberg model obtained using the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16067-16101. doi: 10.3934/math.2022880
[8]	Muammer Ayata, Ozan Özkan . A new application of conformable Laplace decomposition method for fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7402-7412. doi: 10.3934/math.2020474
[9]	Khalid Khan, Amir Ali, Muhammad Irfan, Zareen A. Khan . Solitary wave solutions in time-fractional Korteweg-de Vries equations with power law kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 792-814. doi: 10.3934/math.2023039
[10]	Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa . Numerical analysis of the fractional nonlinear waves of fifth-order KdV and Kawahara equations under Caputo operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31898-31925. doi: 10.3934/math.20241533

Abstract

1. Introduction

Fractional order Kersten-Krasil'shchik (KK) coupled Korteweg-de Vries (KdV)-modified KdV (mKdV) systems have served as the focus of extensive research in recent years due to their potential use in a variety of disciplines, including fluid dynamics, nonlinear optics and plasma physics ^[1,2,3,4]. These systems are characterized by the presence of fractional derivatives, which introduce non-local and memory effects into the dynamics of the system ^[5,6,7,8]. The KK coupled KdV-mKdV system is a system of two coupled nonlinear partial differential equations, which describe the evolution of two waves in a dispersive medium. The first equation is the well-known KdV equation, which describes the propagation of small amplitude, long wavelength waves. The second equation is the mKdV equation, which describes the propagation of larger amplitude, shorter wavelength waves. The KK coupling term, which is a nonlinear and non-local term, describes the interaction between the two waves ^[3,4,7]. Li et al. delved into an epidemic model's analysis and comparisons with other mechanisms in 2018 ^[12], while Jin and Wang explored chemotaxis phenomena in 2016 ^[13]. He et al. focused on fixed-point and variational inequality problems for Hadamard manifolds in 2022 ^[14]; this was followed by He et al. discussing nonexpansive mapping algorithms in 2023 ^[15]. Chen et al. contributed to particle physics, discovering hidden-charm pentaquarks in 2021 ^[16]. Lyu et al. analyzed cavity dynamics in water entries ^[17], whereas Yang and Kai delved into nonlinear Schr $\ddot{o}$ dinger equations in 2023.

Time fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV nonlinear system and homogeneous two component time fractional coupled third order KdV systems are very important fractional nonlinear systems for describing the behaviour of waves in multi-component plasma and elaborate various nonlinear phenomena in plasma physics. Other studies have focused on the stability, existence and uniqueness of solutions for KK coupled KdV-mKdV systems of fractional order. In addition to these studies, there have been many other works that have explored the properties of fractional order KK coupled KdV-mKdV systems, such as their integrability, conservation laws and soliton interactions. Overall, the literature on fractional order KK coupled KdV-mKdV systems is rich and diverse, and it continues to grow as researchers explore new properties and applications of these systems ^[18,19,20].

There are several methods that have been proposed to solve the fractional KdV (fKdV) equation and the mKdV equation. One of these methods is the homotopy perturbation method; this method uses a perturbation series and a homotopy approach to solve nonlinear differential equations. It has been used to find approximate solutions to the fKdV equation ^[21]. The variational iteration method uses a variation of a trial solution to find approximate solutions to nonlinear differential equations. The homotopy analysis method uses a homotopy approach and a perturbation series to solve nonlinear differential equations. It has been used to find approximate solutions to the fKdV equation ^[22] and the mKdV equation ^[23]. The Adomian decomposition method uses a decomposition of the nonlinear term of a differential equation into a series of simpler functions. It has been used to find approximate solutions to the fKdV equation and the mKdV equation ^[24,25]. Yang and Kai, dynamical properties, modulation instability analysis and chaotic behaviors to the nonlinear coupled Schrodinger equation in fiber Bragg gratings ^[26]. Chen et al. presented a linear free energy relationship in chemistry in 2020 ^[27]. Luo et al. proposed a new gradient method for force identification in vehicle-bridge systems in 2022 ^[28]. Additionally, Chen et al. focused on adaptive control of underwater vehicles in 2022 ^[29]. Lastly, Gu, Li and Liao developed an evolutionary multitasking approach for solving nonlinear equation systems in 2024 ^[30]. These studies collectively offer significant insights and advancements across a broad spectrum of scientific research areas, enriching our understanding and methodologies in their respective domains.

The ADM is a powerful technique for solving nonlinear differential equations. Developed by George Adomian in the late 1980s, the ADM is based on the idea of decomposing the solution of a nonlinear equation into a series of simpler functions, known as Adomian polynomials. These polynomials are obtained by iteratively applying the nonlinear operator to a constant function ^[31,32]. The ADM has been applied to a wide range of nonlinear problems, including partial differential equations, integral equations and stochastic differential equations. One of the key advantages of the ADM is its ability to handle equations with singularities, such as those that arise in physics and engineering. In recent years, researchers have been exploring the use of the ADM in combination with other techniques, such as the ZZ transform. The ZZ transform is a mathematical tool that can be used to transform a nonlinear equation into a linear equation, making it easier to solve. By combining the ADM with the ZZ transform, researchers have been able to solve a wide range of nonlinear problems with greater efficiency and accuracy. Many researchers have used the ADM together with the ZZ transform to solve, for example, the nonlinear fractional partial differential equations in fluid dynamics, nonlinear integral equations in quantum mechanics and nonlinear fractional stochastic differential equations in finance. Overall, the ADM with the ZZ transform has been shown to be an efficient and flexible strategy for addressing nonlinear problems, with numerous potential applications in various fields ^[33,34].

The current work is organized as follows. In Section 2, some fundamental definitions of fractional calculus are provided. The basic ideas of the Aboodh transform and the ADM are described in Section 3. In Section 4, we build approximate solutions to fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems of partial differential equations. Section 5 contains the conclusions.

2. Preliminaries

Definition 2.1. For functions, the Aboodh transformation is achieved as follow:

$B = \left\{{U}({\varrho}): \exists M, {{n_1}}, {{n_2}} > 0,|{U}({\varrho})| < M e^{-{\varepsilon} {\varrho}}\right\},$

which is described as follows ^[33,34]:

$A\{{U}({\varrho})\} = \frac{1}{{\varepsilon}} \int_{0}^{\infty} {U}({\varrho}) e^{-{\varepsilon} {\varrho}} d {\varrho},\ \ {\varrho} > 0 \text { and } {{n_1}} \leq {\varepsilon} \leq {{n_2}}.$

Theorem 2.2. Consider $G$ and $F$ as the Aboodh and Laplace transformations, respectively, of $\textit U(\varrho)$ over the set $B$ ^[35,36]. Then

$\begin{equation} G({\varepsilon}) = \frac{F({\varepsilon})}{{\varepsilon}} . \end{equation}$

(2.1)

Generalizing the Laplace and Aboodh integral transformations, Zain Ul Abadin Zafar created the ZZ transformation ^[37]. The ZZ transform is described as follows.

Definition 2.3. For all values of $\varrho \geq 0$ , the Z-transform for the function $\textit U(\varrho)$ is $Z(\kappa, \varepsilon)$ , which can be expressed as follows ^[37]:

$Z Z({U}(\varrho)) = Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon}) = {\varepsilon} \int_{0}^{\infty} {U}({\kappa} \varrho) e^{-{\varepsilon} \varrho} d \varrho.$

The Z-transform is linear in nature, just as the Laplace and Aboodh transforms. On the other hand, the Mittag-Leffler function (MLF) is an expansion of the exponential function:

$E_{{\delta}}(z) = \sum\limits_{m = 0}^{\infty} \frac{z^{m}}{\Gamma(1+m {\delta})}, \quad \operatorname{Re}({\delta}) > 0 .$

Definition 2.4. The Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) derivative of a function ${U}(\varphi, \varrho)$ in the space $H^{1}(a, b)$ for ${{\beta}} \in \; (0, 1)$ has the following definition ^[38]:

${A B C}_{a} D_{\varrho}^{{{\beta}}} {U}(\varphi, \varrho) = \frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \int_{a}^{\varrho} {U}^{\prime}(\varphi, \varrho) E_{{{\beta}}}\left(\frac{-{{\beta}}(\varrho-\eta)^{{{\beta}}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}\right) d \eta .$

Definition 2.5. The Atangana-Baleanu Riemann-Liouville (ABR) derivative is a part of the space $H^{1}(a, b)$ . The derivative can be represented for any value of ${{\beta}} \in (0, 1)$ as follows ^[38]:

${ }_{a}^{A B R} D_{\varrho}^{{{\beta}}} {U}(\varphi, \eta) = \frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{d}{d \varrho} \int_{a}^{\varrho} {U}(\varphi, \eta) E_{{{\beta}}}\left(\frac{-{{\beta}}(\varrho-\eta)^{{{\beta}}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}\right) d \eta.$

The property of the function ${B}({{\beta}})$ is that it tends to 1 for both 0 and 1. Additionally, $\forall \; {{\beta}} > 0$ , ${B}({{\beta}}) > {a}$ .

Theorem 2.6. The Laplace transformation for the ABR derivative and ABC derivative are given by ^[38]:

$\begin{equation} \mathrm{L}\left\{{ }_{a}^{A B C} D_{{\varrho}}^{{{\beta}}} {U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\right\}({\varepsilon}) = \frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}} L\{{U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\}-{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}-1} {U}(\varphi, 0)}{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}} \end{equation}$

(2.2)

and

$\begin{equation} L\left\{\begin{array}{l} A B R \\ a \end{array} D_{{\varrho}}^{{{\beta}}} {U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\right\}({\varepsilon}) = \frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}} L\{{U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\}}{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}. \end{equation}$

(2.3)

In the theorems below we assume that ${U}({\varrho}) \in H^{1}(a, b)$ , where $b > a$ and ${{\beta}} \in (0, 1)$ .

Theorem 2.7. The Aboodh transform gives rise to a new ABR derivative, which is known as the Aboodh transformed ABR derivative ^[36]

$\begin{equation} G({\varepsilon}) = A\left\{\begin{array}{l} A B R \\ a \end{array} D_{{\varrho}}^{{{\beta}}} {U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\right\}({\varepsilon}) = \frac{1}{{\varepsilon}}\left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}} L\{{U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\}}{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{equation}$

(2.4)

Theorem 2.8. The Aboodh transformation of ABC derivative is defined as follows ^[36]:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} G({\varepsilon}) = & A\left\{\begin{array}{l} A B C \\ a \end{array} D_{{\varrho}}^{{{\beta}}} {U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\right\}({\varepsilon}) = \frac{1}{{\varepsilon}}\left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}} L\{{U}(\varphi, {\varrho})\}-{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}-1} {U}(\varphi, 0)}{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.5)

Theorem 2.9. The $\mathrm{ZZ}$ transformation of ${U}({\varrho}) = {\varrho}^{{{\beta}}-1}$ is defined as

$\begin{equation} Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon}) = \Gamma({{\beta}})\left(\frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\right)^{{{\beta}}-1}. \end{equation}$

(2.6)

Proof. The Aboodh transformation of ${U}({\varrho}) = {\varrho}^{{{\beta}}}, \ \ {{\beta}} \geq 0$ is given by

$G({\varepsilon}) = \frac{\Gamma({{\beta}})}{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}+1}}.$

$\text { Now, } \quad G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \frac{\Gamma({{\beta}}) {\kappa}^{{{\beta}}+1}}{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}+1}} \text {. }$

Applying Eq (2.6), we obtain

$Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon}) = \frac{{\varepsilon}^{2}}{{\kappa}^{2}} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \frac{{\varepsilon}^{2}}{{\kappa}^{2}} \frac{\Gamma({{\beta}}) {\kappa}^{{{\beta}}+1}}{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}+1}} = \Gamma({{\beta}})\left(\frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\right)^{{{\beta}}-1}.$

□

Theorem 2.10. Let ${{\beta}}$ and $\omega$ be complex numbers and assume that the real part of ${{\beta}}$ is greater than 0. The $\mathrm{ZZ}$ transformation of $E_{{{\beta}}}\left(\omega {\varrho}^{{{\beta}}}\right)$ can be defined as follows ^[36]:

$\begin{equation} Z Z\left\{\left(E_{{{\beta}}}\left(\omega {\varrho}^{{{\beta}}}\right)\right)\right\} = Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon}) = \left(1-\omega\left(\frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}\right)^{-1}. \end{equation}$

(2.7)

Proof. The Aboodh transformation of $E_{{{\beta}}}\left(\omega {\varrho}^{{{\beta}}}\right)$ is defined as follows:

$\begin{equation} G({\varepsilon}) = \frac{F({\varepsilon})}{{\varepsilon}} = \frac{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}-1}}{{\varepsilon}\left({\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}}-\omega\right)}. \end{equation}$

(2.8)

So,

$\begin{equation} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}-1}}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)\left(\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}-\omega\right)} \text {; } \end{equation}$

(2.9)

we obtain

$\begin{gathered} Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon}) = \left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{2} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{2} \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}-1}}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)\left(\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}-\omega\right)} \\ = \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}-\omega} = \left(1-\omega\left(\frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}\right)^{-1}. \end{gathered}$

□

Theorem 2.11. The ZZ transform of the ABC derivative can be defined as follows: If $G({\varepsilon})$ and $Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon})$ are the ZZ and Aboodh transformations of ${U}({\varrho})$ , respectively ^[36], they we have

$\begin{equation} Z Z\left\{\begin{array}{l} A B C \\ 0 \end{array} D_{{\varrho}}^{{{\beta}}} {U}({\varrho})\right\} = \left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\frac{{\varepsilon}^{a+2}}{{\kappa}^{{{\beta}}+2}} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)-\frac{{\varepsilon}^{\beta}}{{\kappa}^{{{\beta}}}} f(0)}{{\frac{{\varepsilon}^{{\beta}}}{{\kappa}^{{{\beta}}}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{equation}$

(2.10)

Proof. Applying this Eqs (2.1) and (2.5), we get

$\begin{equation} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}+1} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)-\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}-1} f(0)}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{equation}$

(2.11)

The ABC $Z$ transformation is represented as follows:

$\begin{aligned} Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon}) = &\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{2} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{2} \frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}+1} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)-\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}-1} f(0)}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right] \\ & = \left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}+2} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)-\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}} f(0)}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{aligned}$

□

Theorem 2.12. Let us assume that the ZZ transformation of ${U}({\varrho})$ is represented by $G({\varepsilon})$ and the Aboodh transformation of ${U}({\varrho})$ is represented by $Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon})$ . Then, the ZZ transformation of the ABR derivative is defined as ^[36]

$\begin{equation} Z Z\left\{\begin{array}{l} A B R \\ 0 \end{array} D_{{\varrho}}^{{{\beta}}} f({\varrho})\right\} = \left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\frac{{\varepsilon}^{{{\beta}}+2}}{{\kappa}^{{{\beta}}+2}} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)}{\frac{{\varepsilon}^{\mu}}{{\kappa}^{\mu}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{equation}$

(2.12)

Proof. Applying Eqs (2.1) and (2.4), we get

$\begin{equation} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}+1} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{equation}$

(2.13)

$\begin{aligned} Z({\kappa}, {\varepsilon}) = \left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{2} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right) = \left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{2}\left(\frac{{\kappa}}{{\varepsilon}}\right) &\left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}+1} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right] \\ & = \left[\frac{{B}({{\beta}})}{-{{\beta}}+1} \frac{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}+2} G\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)}{\left(\frac{{\varepsilon}}{{\kappa}}\right)^{{{\beta}}}+\frac{{{\beta}}}{-{{\beta}}+1}}\right]. \end{aligned}$

□

3. General methodology of ADM within ZZ transformation

In this section, we will examine the equation known as the fractional partial differential equation:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_{\wp}^{{{{\beta}}}}U(\varphi,\wp) = \mathcal{L}(U(\varphi,\wp))+{N}(U(\varphi,\wp))+h(\varphi,\wp) = M(\varphi,\wp), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.1)

with the initial condition

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U(\varphi,0) = \phi(\varphi), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.2)

where $\mathcal{L}(\varphi, \wp)$ represents linear terms, ${N}(\varphi, \wp)$ represents nonlinear terms and $h(\varphi, \wp)$ represents the source term.

Using the ZZ transform and ABC fractional derivatives, Eq (3.1) can be re-expressed as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{1}{q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon})}\left(\mathbf{Z}[U(\varphi,\wp)]-\frac{\phi(\varphi)}{\varepsilon}\right) = \mathbf{Z}[M(\varphi,\wp)], \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.3)

with

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon}) = \frac{1-{{{\beta}}}+{{{\beta}}}(\frac{{\kappa}}{\varepsilon})^{{{{\beta}}}}}{B({{{\beta}}})}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.4)

By taking the inverse ZZ transform, we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U(\varphi,\wp) = \mathbf{Z}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\varphi)}{\varepsilon}+q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon})\mathbf{Z}[M(\varphi,\wp)]\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.5)

In terms of Adomain decomposition, we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}U_{i}(\varphi,\wp) = &\mathbf{Z}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\varphi)}{\varepsilon}+q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon})\mathbf{Z}[h(\varphi,\wp)]\right)\\ &+\mathbf{Z}^{-1}\left(q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon})\mathbf{Z}\left[\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{L}(U_{i}(\varphi,\wp))+A_{\wp}\right]\right), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.6)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U_{0}^{ABC}(\varphi,\wp) = &\mathbf{Z}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\varphi)}{\varepsilon}+q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon})\mathbf{Z}[h(\varphi,\wp)]\right),\\ U_{1}^{ABC}(\varphi,\wp) = &\mathbf{Z}^{-1}\left(q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon})\mathbf{Z}\left[\mathcal{L}(U_{0}(\varphi,\wp))+A_{0}\right]\right),\\ &\vdots\\ U_{l+1}^{ABC}(\varphi,\wp) = &\mathbf{Z}^{-1}\left(q({{{\beta}}},{{\kappa}},{\varepsilon})\mathbf{Z}\left[\mathcal{L}(U_{l}(\varphi,\wp))+A_{l}\right]\right), \ \ l = 1,2,3,\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.7)

The solution to Eq (3.1) can be expressed by using $ADM_{ABC}$ .

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U^{ABC}(\varphi,\wp) = U_{0}^{ABC}(\varphi,\wp)+U_{1}^{ABC}(\varphi,\wp)+U_{2}^{ABC}(\varphi,\wp)+\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.8)

4. Numerical result

Example 4.1. Let us examine the following fractional KK joined KdV-mKdV nonlinear system:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D^{{{\beta}}}_{{\wp}} U+{U}_{3{\varphi}}-6{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}+3{V} {V}_{3{\varphi}}+3{V}_{{\varphi}} {V}_{2{\varphi}}-3{U}_{{\varphi}} {V}^{2}+6{U} {V} {V}_{{\varphi}} = 0, \ \ {\wp} > 0,\ \ {\varphi} \in R, \ \ 0 < {{\beta}}\leq1,\\ &D_{{\wp}}^{{{\beta}}}{V} +{V}_{3{\varphi}}-3{V}^{2}{V}_{{\varphi}}-3{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}+3{U}_{{\varphi}}{V} = 0, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.1)

with the initial conditions given by

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} {U}({{\varphi}},0) = &c-2c \text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi}), \ \ \ \ c > 0,\\ {V}({{\varphi}},0) = &2\sqrt{c}\text{ sech}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi}). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.2)

By taking the ZZ transform, we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{\mathbf{Z}}[D_{\wp}^{{\beta}}U({\varphi},{\wp})] = -{\mathbf{Z}}\left[{U}_{3{\varphi}}-6{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}+3{V} {V}_{3{\varphi}}+3{V}_{{\varphi}} {V}_{2{\varphi}}-3{U}_{{\varphi}} {V}^{2}+6{U} {V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\right],\\ &{\mathbf{Z}}[D_{\wp}^{{\beta}}V({\varphi},{\wp})] = -{\mathbf{Z}}\left[{V}_{3{\varphi}}-3{V}^{2}{V}_{{\varphi}}-3{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}+3{U}_{{\varphi}}{V}\right]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.3)

Thus we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &\frac{1}{\varepsilon^{{\beta}}}{\mathbf{Z}}[U({\varphi},{\wp})]-{\varepsilon}^{2-{\beta}}{{U}({\varphi},0)} = -{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[{U}_{3{\varphi}}-6{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}+3{V} {V}_{3{\varphi}}+3{V}_{{\varphi}} {V}_{2{\varphi}}-3{U}_{{\varphi}} {V}^{2}+6{U} {V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg],\\ &\frac{1}{\varepsilon^{{\beta}}}{\mathbf{Z}}[V({\varphi},{\wp})]-{\varepsilon}^{2-{\beta}}{{U}({\varphi},0)} = -{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[{V}_{3{\varphi}}-3{V}^{2}{V}_{{\varphi}}-3{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}+3{U}_{{\varphi}}{V}\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.4)

By simplification we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{\mathbf{Z}}[U({\varphi},{\wp})] = {{\varepsilon}^{2}}\Bigg[c-2c\text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\Bigg]-\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[{U}_{3{\varphi}}-6{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}+3{V} {V}_{3{\varphi}}+3{V}_{{\varphi}} {V}_{2{\varphi}}-3{U}_{{\varphi}} {V}^{2}+6{U} {V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg],\\ &{\mathbf{Z}}[V({\varphi},{\wp})] = {{\varepsilon}^{2}}\Bigg[2\sqrt{c}\text{ sech}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\Bigg]-\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[{V}_{3{\varphi}}-3{V}^{2}{V}_{{\varphi}}-3{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}+3{U}_{{\varphi}}{V}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.5)

By taking the inverse ZZ transformation, we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\varphi},{\wp}) = \Bigg[c-2c \text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\Bigg]\\ &-{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{{U}_{3{\varphi}}-6{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}+3{V} {V}_{3{\varphi}}+3{V}_{{\varphi}} {V}_{2{\varphi}}-3{U}_{{\varphi}} {V}^{2}+6{U} {V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg],\\ &V({\varphi},{\wp}) = \Bigg[2\sqrt{c}\text{ sech}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\Bigg]\\ &-{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{{V}_{3{\varphi}}-3{V}^{2}{V}_{{\varphi}}-3{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}+3{U}_{{\varphi}}{V}\Bigg\}\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.6)

Assume that for the unknown functions $U(\varphi, \wp)$ and $V(\varphi, \wp)$ , the series form solution is given as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\varphi},{\wp}) = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}U_{{l}}({\varphi},{\wp}),\\ &V({\varphi},{\wp}) = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}U_{{l}}({\varphi},{\wp}), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.7)

The nonlinear components of the Adomian polynomials can be represented as follows: $-6U U_{\varphi} + 3V V_{3{\varphi}} = \sum_{m = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{A}_m$ , $3V_{\varphi} V_{2{\varphi}} - 3U_{\varphi} V^{2} = \sum_{m = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{B}_m$ , $6U V V_{\varphi} = \sum_{m = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{C}_m$ and $-3V^{2}V_{\varphi} - 3U V_{\varphi} + 3U_{\varphi} V = \sum_{m = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{D}_m$ . With the help of these terms, Eq (4.6) can be expressed as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}U_{{l}+1}({\varphi},{\wp})& = c-2c \text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\\ &-{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{{U}_{3{\varphi}}+\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal A_{{l}}+\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal B_{{l}}+\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal C_{{l}}\Bigg\}\Bigg],\\ \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}V_{{l}+1}({\varphi},{\wp})& = 2\sqrt{c}\text{ sech}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\\ &-{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{{U}_{3{\varphi}}+\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal D_{{l}}\Bigg\}\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.8)

On comparing both sides of Eq (4.8), we have

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} &U_{0}({\varphi},{\wp}) = c-2c \text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi}),\\ &V_{0}({\varphi},{\wp}) = 2\sqrt{c}\text{ sech}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi}),\\ \end{split} \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U_{1}({\varphi},{\wp}) = 8c^{\frac{5}{2}}\sinh(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\text{ sech}^{3}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right),\\ &V_{1}({\varphi},{\wp}) = -4c^{2}\sinh(\sqrt{c}{{\varphi}})\text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right),\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.9)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U_{2}({\varphi},{\wp}) = -16c^{4}[2\cosh^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})-3]\text{ sech}^{4}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\Bigg[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\Bigg],\\ &V_{2}({\varphi},{\wp}) = 8c^{\frac{7}{2}}[\cosh^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})-2]\text{ sech}^{3}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\left[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\right].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.10)

In this manner, the terms $U{{l}}$ and $V{{l}}$ for $({l}\geq3)$ can be easily obtained. As a result, the series solution can be expressed as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U({\varphi},{\wp})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}U_{{l}}({\varphi},{\wp}) = U_{0}({\varphi},{\wp})+U_{1}({\varphi},{\wp})+U_{2}({\varphi},{\wp})+\cdots,\\ U({\varphi},{\wp})& = c-2c \text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})+8c^{\frac{5}{2}}\sinh(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\text{ sech}^{3}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right)-\\ &16c^{4}[2\cosh^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})-3]\text{ sech}^{4}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\Bigg[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\Bigg]+\cdots\\ V({\varphi},{\wp})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}V_{{l}}({\varphi},{\wp}) = V_{0}({\varphi},{\wp})+V_{1}({\varphi},{\wp})+V_{2}({\varphi},{\wp})+\cdots,\\ V({\varphi},{\wp})& = 2\sqrt{c}\text{ sech}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})-4c^{2}\sinh(\sqrt{c}{{\varphi}})\text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right)+\\ &8c^{\frac{7}{2}}[\cosh^{2}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})-2]\text{ sech}^{3}(\sqrt{c}{\varphi})\left[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\right]+\cdots\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.11)

When ${\beta} = 1$ , we get the exact solution as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\varphi},{\wp}) = c-2c \text{ sech}^{2}(\sqrt{c}({\varphi}+2c{\wp})),\\ &V({\varphi},{\wp}) = 2\sqrt{c} \text{ sech}(\sqrt{c}({\varphi}+2c{\wp})).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.12)

The graphical discussion involves several key figures illustrate the solutions for $U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ and $V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ in Example 4.1 at different parameter values. showcases the analytical and exact solutions at ${\beta} = 1$ for $U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ . In , the approximate solutions are depicted at ${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ .

Figure 1. The analytical and exact solutions at

${\beta} = 1$ in

$U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.1.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. The approximate solutions at

${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ in

$U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.1.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

extends the analysis by presenting analytical solutions at various values of ${\beta}$ for $U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ . Moving on to $V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ , exhibits the analytical and exact solutions at ${\beta} = 1$ , while displays the analytical results at ${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ .

Figure 3. The analytical solutions at various values of

${\beta}$ in

$U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.1.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 4. The analytical and exact solutions at

${\beta} = 1$ in

$V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.1.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 5. The analytical result at

${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ in

$V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.1.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Lastly, provides a comprehensive overview, presenting analytical results at various values of ${\beta}$ , including ${\beta} = 1, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4$ , for $V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ . These figures collectively offer a detailed visual representation of the solutions under different conditions, facilitating a thorough understanding of the system's behavior.

Figure 6. The analytical result at various values in

${\beta}$ for

$V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.1.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Example 4.2. Let us examine a homogeneous two-component KdV system of third order with a time-fractional component, as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D^{{{\beta}}}_{{\wp}} {U}-{U}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}-{V} {V}_{{\varphi}} = 0,\ \ {\wp} > 0,\ \ {\varphi} \in R, \ \ 0 < {{\beta}}\leq1,\\ &D_{{\wp}}^{{{\beta}}}{V} +2{V}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {V}_{{\varphi}} = 0, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.13)

with the initial conditions given by

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\varphi},0) = 3-6\tanh^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right),\\ &V({\varphi},0) = -3c\sqrt{2}\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.14)

By taking the ZZ transform, we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{\mathbf{Z}}[D_{\wp}^{{\beta}}U({\varphi},{\wp})] = -{\mathbf{Z}}\left[-{U}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}-{V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\right],\\ &{\mathbf{Z}}[D_{\wp}^{{\beta}}V({\varphi},{\wp})] = -{\mathbf{Z}}\left[2{V}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}\right]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.15)

Thus we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &\frac{1}{\varepsilon^{{\beta}}}{\mathbf{Z}}[U({\varphi},{\wp})]-{\varepsilon}^{2-{\beta}}{{U}({\varphi},0)} = -{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[-{U}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}-{V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg],\\ &\frac{1}{\varepsilon^{{\beta}}}{\mathbf{Z}}[V({\varphi},{\wp})]-{\varepsilon}^{2-{\beta}}{{U}({\varphi},0)} = -{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[2{V}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.16)

By simplification we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{\mathbf{Z}}[U({\varphi},{\wp})] = {{\varepsilon}^{2}}\Bigg[3-6\tanh^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\Bigg]-\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[-{U}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}-{V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg],\\ &{\mathbf{Z}}[V({\varphi},{\wp})] = {{\varepsilon}^{2}}\Bigg[-3c\sqrt{2}\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\Bigg]-\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}{\mathbf{Z}}\Bigg[2{V}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.17)

By taking the inverse ZZ transform, we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\varphi},{\wp}) = 3-6\tanh^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\\ &-{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{-{U}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {U}_{{\varphi}}-{V} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg],\\ &V({\varphi},{\wp}) = \Bigg[-3c\sqrt{2}\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\Bigg]\\ &-{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{2{V}_{3{\varphi}}-{U} {V}_{{\varphi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.18)

Assume that for the unknown functions $U(\varphi, \wp)$ and $V(\varphi, \wp)$ , the series form solution is given as

(4.19)

The representation of nonlinear components using Adomian polynomials is shown as follows: $-UU_{\varphi}-VV_{\varphi} = \sum_{m = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{A}_m$ and $UV{\varphi} = \sum_{m = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{B}_m$ . With these terms, Eq (4.18) can be expressed as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}U_{{l}+1}({\varphi},{\wp})& = 3-6\tanh^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\\ &+{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{-{U}_{3{\varphi}}+\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal A_{{l}}\Bigg\}\Bigg],\\ \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}V_{{l}+1}({\varphi},{\wp})& = -3c\sqrt{2}\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\\ &+{\mathbf{Z}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\left(1-{\beta}+{\beta}\left(\frac{\kappa}{\varepsilon}\right)^{{\beta}}\right)}{{B}({\beta})}\mathbf{Z}\Bigg\{2{V}_{3{\varphi}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal B_{{l}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.20)

On comparing both sides of Eq (4.20), we have

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} &U_{0}({\varphi},{\wp}) = 3-6\tanh^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right),\\ &V_{0}({\varphi},{\wp}) = -3c\sqrt{2}\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right),\\ \end{split} \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U_{1}({\varphi},{\wp}) = 6\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right),\\ &V_{1}({\varphi},{\wp}) = 3c\sqrt{2}\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right),\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.21)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U_{2}({\varphi},{\wp}) = 3[2+7\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)-15\text{ sech}^{4}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)]\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\left[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\right],\\ &V_{2}({\varphi},{\wp}) = \frac{3c\sqrt{2}}{2}\left[2+21\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)-24\text{ sech}^{4}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\right]\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\Bigg[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\Bigg].\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.22)

By using this method, the terms $U{{l}}$ and $V{{l}}$ can be easily obtained for ${l}\geq3$ . Therefore, the solution in the form of a series is as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} U({\varphi},{\wp})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}U_{{l}}({\varphi},{\wp}) = U_{0}({\varphi},{\wp})+U_{1}({\varphi},{\wp})+U_{2}({\varphi},{\wp})+\cdots,\\ U({\varphi},{\wp})& = 3-6\tanh^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)+6\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right)+\\ &3[2+7\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)-15\text{ sech}^{4}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)]\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\left[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\right]+\cdots.\\ V({\varphi},{\wp})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}V_{{l}}({\varphi},{\wp}) = V_{0}({\varphi},{\wp})+V_{1}({\varphi},{\wp})+V_{2}({\varphi},{\wp})+\cdots,\\ V({\varphi},{\wp})& = -3c\sqrt{2}\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)+3c\sqrt{2}\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\tanh\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\left(1-{\beta}+\frac{{\beta}\wp^{\beta}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}\right)+\\ &\frac{3c\sqrt{2}}{2}\left[2+21\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)-24\text{ sech}^{4}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\right]\text{ sech}^{2}\left(\frac{{\varphi}}{2}\right)\Bigg[\frac{{\beta}^{2}\wp^{2{\beta}}}{\Gamma(2{\beta}+1)}+2{\beta}(1-{\beta})\frac{\wp^{{\beta}}}{\Gamma({\beta}+1)}+(1-{\beta})^{2}\Bigg]+\cdots.\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.23)

When ${\beta} = 1$ , we get the exact solution as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U({\varphi},{\wp}) = 3-6\tanh^{2}\Big(\frac{{\varphi}+{\wp}}{2}\Big),\\ &{V({\varphi},{\wp})} = -3c\sqrt{2}\tanh\Big(\frac{{\varphi}+{\wp}}{2}\Big). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.24)

The graphical discussion involves several key figures that illustrate the solutions for $U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ and $V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ in Example 4.2 at different parameter values. showcases the analytical and exact solutions at ${\beta} = 1$ for $U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ . In , the approximate solutions are depicted at ${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ .

Figure 7. The analytical and exact solutions at

${\beta} = 1$ in

$U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.2.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 8. The analytical result at

${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ in

$U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.2.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

extends the analysis by presenting analytical solutions at various values of ${\beta}$ for $U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ . We will moving on to $V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ .

Figure 9. The analytical result at various values of

${\beta}$ in

$U({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.2.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

exhibits analytical and exact solutions at ${\beta} = 1$ , while displays the analytical results at ${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ . Lastly, provides a comprehensive overview, presenting the analytical results at various values of ${\beta}$ , including ${\beta} = 1, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4$ , for $V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ . These figures collectively offer a detailed visual representation of the solutions under different conditions, facilitating a thorough understanding of the system's behavior.

Figure 10. The analytical and exact result at

${\beta} = 1$ in

$V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.2.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 11. The analytical solution of

${\beta} = 0.8, 0.6$ in

$V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.2.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 12. The analytical result at various values in

${\beta}$ for

$V({\varphi}, {\wp})$ for Example 4.2.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

5. Conclusions

In summary, the combination of the ADM and the ZZ transform has demonstrated its effectiveness in the analysis of the fractional KK coupled KdV-mKdV system encountered in multi-component plasmas. The utilization of this method has yielded accurate and efficient solutions, offering valuable insights into the intricate behavior of these complex systems. Additionally, the incorporation of the ZZ transform has enabled this frequency domain analysis, contributing supplementary information regarding the system's dynamics. This integrated approach stands as a valuable tool for comprehending multi-component plasma behaviors, and it holds the potential for application to analogous systems in future investigations. Future work may explore extending this methodology to different plasma models or investigating the impact of additional physical parameters, thereby broadening the scope of its applicability.

Use of AI tools declaration

The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

Funding

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, the Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Grant No. 5081).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, the Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Grant No. 5081).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1]	S. R. E. Koumy, E. S. I. Barakat, S. I. Abdelsalam, Hall and porous boundaries effects on peristaltic transport through porous medium of a Maxwell model, Transp. Porous Med., 94 (2012), 643-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-012-0016-y doi: 10.1007/s11242-012-0016-y
[2]	Y. A. Elmaboud, S. I. Abdelsalam, DC/AC magnetohydrodynamic-micropump of a generalized Burger's fluid in an annulus, Phys. Scr., 94 (2019), 115209. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab206d doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ab206d
[3]	R. V. Williamson, The flow of pseudoplastic materials, Ind. Eng. Chem., 21 (1929), 1108-1111. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50239a035 doi: 10.1021/ie50239a035
[4]	S. Nadeem, S. T. Hussain, C. Lee, Flow of a Williamson fluid over a stretching sheet, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 30 (2013), 619-625. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322013000300019 doi: 10.1590/S0104-66322013000300019
[5]	S. Nadeem, S. T. Hussain, Heat transfer analysis of Williamson fluid over exponentially stretching surface, Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed., 35 (2014), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-014-1807-6 doi: 10.1007/s10483-014-1807-6
[6]	N. A. Khan, H. Khan, A boundary layer flows of non-Newtonian Williamson fluid, Nonlinear Eng., 3 (2014), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2014-0002 doi: 10.1515/nleng-2014-0002
[7]	T. Hayat, U. Khalid, M. Qasim, Steady flow of a Williamson fluid past a porous plate, Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng., 7 (2012), 302-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.496 doi: 10.1002/apj.496
[8]	M. R. Krishnamurthy, K. G. Kumar, B. J. Gireesha, N. G. Rudraswamy, MHD flow and heat transfer (PST and PHF) of dusty fluid suspended with alumina nanoparticles over a stretching sheet embedded in a porous medium under the influence of thermal radiation, J. Nanofluids, 7 (2018), 527-535. https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2018.1473 doi: 10.1166/jon.2018.1473
[9]	K. G. Kumar, R. U. Haq, N. G. Rudraswamy, B. J. Gireesha, Effects of mass transfer on MHD three dimensional flow of a Prandtl liquid over a flat plate in the presence of chemical reaction, Results Phys., 7 (2017), 3465-3471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.08.060 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.08.060
[10]	A. Zaib, R. U. Haq, A. J. Chamkha, M. M. Rashidi, Impact of nonlinear radiative nanoparticles on an unsteady flow of a Williamson fluid toward a permeable convectively heated shrinking sheet, World J. Eng., 15 (2018), 731-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-02-2018-0050 doi: 10.1108/WJE-02-2018-0050
[11]	U. Khan, A. Zaib, I. Khan, K. S. Nisar, Dual solutions of nanomaterial flow comprising titanium alloy (Ti₆Al₄V) suspended in Williamson fluid through a thin moving needle with nonlinear thermal radiation: Stability scrutinization, Sci. Rep., 10 (2020), 20933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77996-x doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77996-x
[12]	M. A. Qureshi, Numerical simulation of heat transfer flow subject to MHD of Williamson nanofluid with thermal radiation, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13010010 doi: 10.3390/sym13010010
[13]	R. Raza, F. Mabood, R. Naz, S. I. Abdelsalam, Thermal transport of radiative Williamson fluid over stretchable curved surface, Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., 23 (2021), 100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100887 doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100887
[14]	S. Jana, A. Salehi-Khojin, W. H. Zhong, Enhancement of fluid thermal conductivity by the addition of single and hybrid nano-additives, Thermochim. Acta, 462 (2007), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2007.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2007.06.009
[15]	N. Jha, S. Ramaprabhu, Thermal conductivity studies of metal dispersed multiwalled carbon nanotubes in water and ethylene glycol based nanofluids, J. Appl. Phys., 106 (2009), 084317. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3240307 doi: 10.1063/1.3240307
[16]	D. Madhesh, S. Kalaiselvam, Experimental analysis of hybrid nanofluid as a coolant, Procedia Eng., 97 (2014), 1667-1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.317 doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.317
[17]	S. P. A. Devi, S. S. U. Devi, Numerical investigation of hydromagnetic hybrid Cu-Al₂O₃/water nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with suction, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 17 (2016), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2016-0037 doi: 10.1515/ijnsns-2016-0037
[18]	S. U. Devi, S. P. A. Devi, Heat transfer enhancement of Cu-Al₂O₃/water hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet, J. Niger Math. Soc., 36 (2017), 419-433. https://ojs.ictp.it/jnms/index.php/jnms/article/view/147
[19]	J. Sarkar, P. Ghosh, A. Adil, A review on hybrid nanofluids: Recent research, development and applications, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 43 (2015), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.023 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.023
[20]	N. A. C. Sidik, I. M. Adamu, M. M. Jamil, G. H. R. Kefayati, R. Mamat, G. Najafi, Recent progress on hybrid nanofluids in heat transfer applications: A comprehensive review, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 78 (2016), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.08.019 doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.08.019
[21]	J. A. Ranga Babu, K. K. Kumar, S. S. Rao, State-of-art review on hybrid nanofluids, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 77 (2017), 551-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.040 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.040
[22]	M. U. Sajid, H. M. Ali, Thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids: A critical review, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 126 (2018), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.021 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.021
[23]	S. K. Singh, J. Sarkar, Energy, exergy and economic assessments of shell and tube condenser using hybrid nanofluid as coolant, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 98 (2018), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.08.005
[24]	M. Sheikholeslami, M. B. Gerdroodbary, A. Shafee, I. Tlili, Hybrid nanoparticles dispersion into water inside a porous wavy tank involving magnetic force, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 141 (2020), 1993-1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08858-6 doi: 10.1007/s10973-019-08858-6
[25]	M. Gholinia, M. Armin, A. A. Ranjbar, D. D. Ganji, Numerical thermal study on CNTs/ C₂H₆O₂-H₂O hybridbase nanofluid upon a porous stretching cylinder under impact of magnetic source, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 14 (2019), 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100490 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2019.100490
[26]	U. Khan, A. Zaib, F. Mebarek-Oudina, Mixed convective magneto flow of SiO₂-MoS₂/C₂H₆O₂ hybrid nanoliquids through a vertical stretching/shrinking wedge: Stability analysis, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 45 (2020), 9061-9073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04680-7 doi: 10.1007/s13369-020-04680-7
[27]	I. Waini, A. Ishak, I. Pop, MHD flow and heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid past a permeable stretching/shrinking wedge, Appl. Math. Mech., 41 (2020), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-020-2584-7 doi: 10.1007/s10483-020-2584-7
[28]	A. Wakif, A. Chamkha, T. Thumma, I. L. Animasaun, R. Sehaqui, Thermal radiation and surface roughness effects on the thermo‑magneto‑hydrodynamic stability of alumina-copper oxide hybrid nanofluids utilizing the generalized Buongiorno's nanofluid model, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 143 (2021), 1201-1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09488-z doi: 10.1007/s10973-020-09488-z
[29]	N. A. Zainal, R. Nazar, K. Naganthran, I. Pop, Unsteady MHD stagnation point flow induced by exponentially permeable stretching/shrinking sheet of hybrid nanofluid, Eng. Sci. Tech. Int. J., 24 (2021), 1201-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.01.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.01.018
[30]	I. Waini, A. Ishak, I. Pop, Hybrid nanofluid flow towards a stagnation point on an exponentially stretching/shrinking vertical sheet with buoyancy effects, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow, 31 (2021), 216-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-02-2020-0086 doi: 10.1108/HFF-02-2020-0086
[31]	M. M. Bhatti, S. I. Abdelsalam, Bio-inspired peristaltic propulsion of hybrid nanofluid flow with Tantalum (Ta) and Gold (Au) nanoparticles under magnetic effects, Waves Random Complex Media, 2021, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.1998728 doi: 10.1080/17455030.2021.1998728
[32]	L. J. Zhang, T. Nazar, M. M. Bhatti, E. E. Michaelides, Stability analysis on the kerosene nanofluid flow with hybrid zinc/aluminum-oxide (ZnO-Al₂O₃) nanoparticles under Lorentz force, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow, 32 (2021), 740-760. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-02-2021-0103 doi: 10.1108/HFF-02-2021-0103
[33]	L. J. Zhang, M. M. Bhatti, A. Shahid, R. Ellahi, O. A. Bég, S. M. Sait, Nonlinear nanofluid fluid flow under the consequences of Lorentz forces and Arrhenius kinetics through a permeable surface: A robust spectral approach, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 124 (2021), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.065 doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.065
[34]	M. M. Bhatti, M. B. Arain, A. Zeeshan, R. Ellahi, M. H. Doranehgard, Swimming of gyrotactic microorganism in MHD Williamson nanofluid flow between rotating circular plates embedded in porous medium: Application of thermal energy storage, J. Energy Storage, 45 (2022), 103511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103511 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103511
[35]	W. Tollmien, H. Schlichting, H. Görtler, F. W. Riegels, Über Flüssigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung, In: Ludwig Prandtl Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1961,575-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11836-8_43
[36]	H. Blasius, Grenzschichten in flüssigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung, Z. Math. Phys., 56 (1908), 1-37.
[37]	L. Prandtl, On boundary layers in three-dimensional flow, Rep. Aero. Res. Coun. London, 1946.
[38]	J. C. Cooke, M. G. Hall, Boundary layers in three-dimensional, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2 (1962), 222-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(62)90008-8 doi: 10.1016/0376-0421(62)90008-8
[39]	E. A. Eichelbrenner, Three-dimensional boundary layers, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 5 (1973), 339-360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.05.010173.002011 doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.05.010173.002011
[40]	P. Weidman, Further solutions for laminar boundary layers with cross flows driven by boundary motion, Acta Mech., 228 (2017), 1979-1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-1810-y doi: 10.1007/s00707-017-1810-y
[41]	N. C. Roşca, A. V. Roşca, A. Jafarimoghaddam, I. Pop, Cross flow and heat transfer past a permeable stretching/shrinking sheet in a hybrid nanofluid, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow, 31 (2021), 1295-1319. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-05-2020-0298 doi: 10.1108/HFF-05-2020-0298
[42]	R. Viskanta, R. J. Grosh, Boundary layer in thermal radiation absorbing and emitting media, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 5 (1962), 795-806.https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(62)90180-1 doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(62)90180-1
[43]	E. M. A. Elbashbeshy, Radiation effect on heat transfer over a stretching surface, Can. J. Phys., 78 (2000), 1107-1112. https://doi.org/10.1139/p00-085 doi: 10.1139/p00-085
[44]	M. A. El-Aziz, Radiation effect on the flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching sheet, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 36 (2009), 521-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.01.016 doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.01.016
[45]	T. Hayat, M. Qasim, Z. Abbas, Radiation and mass transfer effects on the magnetohydrodynamic unsteady flow induced by a stretching sheet, Z. Naturforsch. A, 65 (2010), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2010-0312 doi: 10.1515/zna-2010-0312
[46]	A. Zaib, S. Shafie, Thermal diffusion and diffusion thermo effects on unsteady MHD free convection flow over a stretching surface considering Joule heating and viscous dissipation with thermal stratification, chemical reaction and Hall current, J. Franklin Inst., 351 (2014), 1268-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.10.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.10.011
[47]	U. Khan, A. Zaib, A. Ishak, S. A. Bakar, I. L. Animasaun, S. J. Yook, Insights into the dynamics of blood conveying gold nanoparticles on a curved surface when suction, thermal radiation, and Lorentz force are significant: The case of non-Newtonian Williamson fluid, Math. Comput. Simulat., 193 (2022), 250-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.10.014 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.10.014
[48]	B. C. Sakiadis, Boundary-layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I. Boundary layer equations for two-dimensional and axisymmetric flow, AIChE J., 7 (1961), 26-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690070108 doi: 10.1002/aic.690070108
[49]	L. J. Crane, Flow past a stretching plate, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 21 (1970), 645-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01587695 doi: 10.1007/BF01587695
[50]	C. Y. Wang, Liquid film on an unsteady stretching surface, Q. Appl. Math., 48 (1990), 601-610. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43637666
[51]	S. Goldstein, On backward boundary layers and flow in converging passages, J. Fluid Mech., 21 (1965), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112065000034 doi: 10.1017/S0022112065000034
[52]	M. Miklavčič, C. Y. Wang, Viscous flow due to a shrinking sheet, Q. Appl. Math., 64 (2006), 283-290. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43638726
[53]	T. G. Fang, J. Zhang, S. S. Yao, Viscous flow over an unsteady shrinking sheet with mass transfer, Chin. Phys. Lett., 26 (2009), 014703. https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/26/1/014703 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/26/1/014703
[54]	I. Waini, A. Ishak, I. Pop, Unsteady flow and heat transfer past a stretching/shrinking sheet in a hybrid nanofluid, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 136 (2019), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.101 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.101
[55]	U. Khan, A. Zaib, S. A. Bakar, A. Ishak, Stagnation-point flow of a hybrid nanoliquid over a non-isothermal stretching/shrinking sheet with characteristics of inertial and microstructure, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 26 (2021), 101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101150 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101150
[56]	N. H. A. Norzawary, N. Bachok, F. M. Ali, Stagnation point flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet in a carbon nanotubes with suction/injection effects, CFD Lett., 12 (2021), 106-114. https://akademiabaru.com/submit/index.php/cfdl/article/view/3217
[57]	P. D. Weidman, D. G. Kubitschek, S. N. Brown, Boundary layer similarity flow driven by power-law shear, Acta Mech., 120 (1997), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174324 doi: 10.1007/BF01174324
[58]	K. S. Nisar, U. Khan, A. Zaib, I. Khan, D. Baleanu, Exploration of aluminum and titanium alloys in the stream-wise and secondary flow directions comprising the significant impacts of magnetohydrodynamic and hybrid nanofluid, Crystals, 10 (2020), 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10080679 doi: 10.3390/cryst10080679
[59]	U. Khan, A. Zaib, M. Sheikholeslami, A. Wakif, D. Baleanu, Mixed convective radiative flow through a slender revolution bodies containing molybdenum-disulfide graphene oxide along with generalized hybrid nanoparticles in porous media, Crystals, 10 (2020), 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10090771 doi: 10.3390/cryst10090771
[60]	Y. M. Chu, K. S. Nisar, U. Khan, H. D. Kasmaei, M. Malaver, A. Zaib, et al., Mixed convection in MHD water-based molybdenum disulfide-graphene oxide hybrid nanofluid through an upright cylinder with shape factor, Water, 12 (2020), 1723. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061723 doi: 10.3390/w12061723
[61]	L. F. Shampine, I. Gladwell, S. Thompson, Solving ODEs with matlab, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[62]	L. F. Shampine, J. Kierzenka, M. W. Reichelt, Solving boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations in MATLAB with bvp4c, Tutorial Notes, 2000 (2000), 1-27.
[63]	Y. M. Chu, U. Khan, A. Shafiq, A. Zaib, Numerical simulations of time-dependent micro-rotation blood flow induced by a curved moving surface through conduction of gold particles with non-uniform heat sink/source, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 46 (2021), 2413-2427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05106-0 doi: 10.1007/s13369-020-05106-0
[64]	J. H. Merkin, On dual solutions occurring in mixed convection in a porous medium, J. Eng. Math., 20 (1986), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042775 doi: 10.1007/BF00042775
[65]	P. D. Weidman, D. G. Kubitschek, A. M. J. Davis, The effect of transpiration on self-similar boundary layer flow over moving surfaces, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 44 (2006), 730-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2006.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2006.04.005
[66]	A. Ridha, M. Curie, Aiding flows non-unique similarity solutions of mixed-convection boundary-layer equations, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 47 (1996), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916642 doi: 10.1007/BF00916642
[67]	A. Ishak, J. H. Merkin, R. Nazar, I. Pop, Mixed convection boundary layer flow over a permeable vertical surface with prescribed wall heat flux, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 59 (2008), 100-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-006-6082-7 doi: 10.1007/s00033-006-6082-7
[68]	I. Waini, A. Ishak, I. Pop, Transpiration effects on hybrid nanofluid flow and heat transfer over a stretching/shrinking sheet with uniform shear flow, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.010

This article has been cited by:

1.	M. Sivakumar, M. Mallikarjuna, R. Senthamarai, A kinetic non-steady state analysis of immobilized enzyme systems with external mass transfer resistance, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 18083, 10.3934/math.2024882
2.	Sajad Iqbal, Francisco Martínez, An innovative approach to approximating solutions of fractional partial differential equations, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 065259, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad4928
3.	Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa, Dark and bright soliton phenomena of the generalized time-space fractional equation with gas bubbles, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 30043, 10.3934/math.20241451
4.	Nazik J. Ahmed, Abdulghafor M. Al-Rozbayani, 2024, Chapter 43, 978-3-031-70923-4, 571, 10.1007/978-3-031-70924-1_43
5.	Panpan Wang, Xiufang Feng, Shangqin He, Lie Symmetry Analysis of Fractional Kersten–Krasil’shchik Coupled KdV–mKdV System, 2025, 24, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01152-3
6.	Khudhayr A. Rashedi, Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa, Tariq S. Alshammari, Adel Almarashi, Lump-type kink wave phenomena of the space-time fractional phi-four equation, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 34372, 10.3934/math.20241637
7.	Manohar R. Gombi, B. J. Gireesha, P. Venkatesh, M. L. Keerthi, G. K. Ramesh, Fractional-order energy equation of a fully wet longitudinal fin with convective–radiative heat exchange through Sumudu transform analysis, 2025, 29, 1385-2000, 10.1007/s11043-025-09773-0
8.	Galal M. Moatimid, Mona A. A. Mohamed, Khaled Elagamy, Ahmed A. Gaber, Analysis of Eyring–Powell couple stress nanofluid flow with motile microorganisms over a rough sphere: Modified Adomian decomposition, 2025, 105, 0044-2267, 10.1002/zamm.202400981

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)