Let {Yn,n≥1} be sequence of random variables with EYn=0 and supnE|Yn|p<∞ for each p>2 satisfying Rosenthal type inequality. In this paper, the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variable sequence with non-identical distributions is established by the Rosenthal type inequality and Berry-Esseen bounds. The results extend the known ones from i.i.d and NA cases to a class of random variable satisfying Rosenthal type inequality.
Citation: Haichao Yu, Yong Zhang. The law of iterated logarithm for a class of random variables satisfying Rosenthal type inequality[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11076-11083. doi: 10.3934/math.2021642
[1] | Qunying Wu . The convergence rate for the laws of logarithms under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24786-24801. doi: 10.3934/math.20231264 |
[2] | Khuram Ali Khan, Shaista Ayaz, İmdat İşcan, Nehad Ali Shah, Wajaree Weera . Applications of Hölder-İşcan inequality for $ n $-times differentiable $ (s, m) $-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1620-1635. doi: 10.3934/math.2023082 |
[3] | Pinhong Long, Xing Li, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Wenshuai Wang . The Fekete-Szegö type inequalities for certain subclasses analytic functions associated with petal shaped region. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6087-6106. doi: 10.3934/math.2021357 |
[4] | Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Sheza.M. El-Deeb, Daniel Breaz, Wali Khan Mashwani, Bakhtiar Ahmad . Sufficiency criteria for a class of convex functions connected with tangent function. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18608-18624. doi: 10.3934/math.2024906 |
[5] | Xueping Hu, Jingya Wang . A Berry-Ess$\acute{e}$n bound of wavelet estimation for a nonparametric regression model under linear process errors based on LNQD sequence. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6985-6995. doi: 10.3934/math.2020448 |
[6] | Yi Wu, Duoduo Zhao . Law of the single logarithm for randomly weighted sums of dependent sequences and an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 10141-10156. doi: 10.3934/math.2024496 |
[7] | Chunyan Luo, Yuping Yu, Tingsong Du . Estimates of bounds on the weighted Simpson type inequality and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4644-4661. doi: 10.3934/math.2020298 |
[8] | Feng Qi, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Gauhar Rahman . Convexity and inequalities related to extended beta and confluent hypergeometric functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1499-1507. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1499 |
[9] | Muhammmad Ghaffar Khan, Wali Khan Mashwani, Jong-Suk Ro, Bakhtiar Ahmad . Problems concerning sharp coefficient functionals of bounded turning functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27396-27413. doi: 10.3934/math.20231402 |
[10] | Sarra Toualbia, Abderrahmane Zaraï, Salah Boulaaras . Decay estimate and non-extinction of solutions of p-Laplacian nonlocal heat equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1663-1679. doi: 10.3934/math.2020112 |
Let {Yn,n≥1} be sequence of random variables with EYn=0 and supnE|Yn|p<∞ for each p>2 satisfying Rosenthal type inequality. In this paper, the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variable sequence with non-identical distributions is established by the Rosenthal type inequality and Berry-Esseen bounds. The results extend the known ones from i.i.d and NA cases to a class of random variable satisfying Rosenthal type inequality.
We first introduce the definition of the Rosenthal type maximal inequality, which is one of the most interesting inequalities in probability theory and mathematical statistics. Suppose that {Yn,n≥1} is a sequence of random variables satisfying E|Yi|r<∞ for r≥2, then there exists a positive constant C(r) depending only on r such that
Emax1≤j≤n|j∑k=1(Yk−EYk)|r≤C(r)[n∑k=1E|Yk−EYk|r+(n∑k=1E|Yk−EYk|2)r/2]≤2C(r)nr/2supnE|Yn−EYn|r. | (1.1) |
(1.1) can be satisfied by many dependent or mixing sequences. Peligrad [1], Zhou [2], Wang and Lu [3], Utev and Peligrad [4] established the above inequality for ρ−mixing sequence, φ−mixing sequence, ρ−mixing sequence and ˜ρ−mixing sequence, respectively. We also refer to Shao [5], Stoica [6], Shen [7], Yuan and An [8], Shen et al. [9] and Merlevˊede and Peligrad [10] for negatively associated sequence (NA), martingale difference sequence, extend negatively dependent sequence (END), asymptotically almost negatively associated random sequence (AANA), negatively superadditive dependent (NSD), stationary processes, respectively.
The law of iterated logarithm (LIL, for short) is an important aspect in probability theory because it can describe the precise convergence rates. Petrov [11] established the following LIL for independent random variables.
Theorem A. Let {Xn,n≥1} be independent random variables sequences with EXn=0, σ2n=EX2n<∞, B′n=∑nk=1σ2k, Sn=∑nk=1Xk. If the following assumptions are satisfied:
(i) B′n→∞, when n→∞,
(ii) B′n+1/B′n→1, when n→∞,
(iii) Δn=supx|P(Sn<x√B′n)−Φ(x)|=O[(logB′n)−1−δ], δ>0, here and in the sequel Φ(⋅) is a standard normal distribution function, hold.
Then
lim supn→∞Sn(2B′nloglogB′n)1/2=1a.s. |
Later on, Cai and Wu [12] established the following LIL for NA random variables.
Theorem B. Let {Xn,n≥1} be NA random variables sequence with EXn=0 and supnEX2n(log|Xn|)1+δ<∞ for some δ>0. Let Sn=∑nk=1Xk, Bn=Var(Sn)>0, B′n=∑nk=1EX2k. Δn=supx|P(Sn<x√B′n)−Φ(x)|. If
(i) Bn=O(n),
(ii) Bn+1/Bn→1, when n→∞,
(iii) Δn=O[(logBn)−1],
(iv) Bn/B′n→1, when n→∞,
hold, then
lim supn→∞Sn(2BnloglogBn)1/2=1a.s. |
In this paper, the main purpose is to establish the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variables satisfying Rosenthal type maximal inequality with non-identical distributions. The following is the main result.
Theorem 1.1. Let {Yn,n≥1} be a sequence of random variables with EYn=0 and supnE|Yn|p<∞ for each p>2 satisfying (1.1), denote Sn=∑nk=1Yk, Bn=Var(Sn)>0. If
(i) Bn=O(n), Bn+1/Bn→1, when n→∞,
(ii) Δn,m=supx|P(Sn+m−Sm<x√Bn+m−Bm)−Φ(x)|=O[(log(Bn+m−Bm))−1−δ] for some δ>0 and any m≥0, n≥1, where S0=0, B0=0,
hold, then
lim supn→∞Sn(2BnloglogBn)1/2=1a.s. | (1.2) |
Corollary 1.2. Let {Yn,n≥1} be a strictly stationary sequence of random variables with EY1=0 and E|Y1|p<∞ for each p>2 satisfying (1.1), denote Sn=∑nk=1Yk, Bn=Var(Sn)>0. If
(i) 0<σ2=:EY21+∑∞k=1EY1Y1+k<∞,
(ii) Δn=supx|P(Sn<x√Bn)−Φ(x)|=O[(logBn)−1−δ] for some δ>0,
hold, then
lim supn→∞Sn(2nσ2loglogn)1/2=1a.s. | (1.3) |
Remark 1.3. The assumption (ii) in Theorem 1.1, that is the Berry-Esseen bounds, can be satisfied by many sequence, such as independent sequence, NA sequence with convergence rate n−α, 0<α≤1/2.
Throughout the sequel, C represents a positive constant although its value may change from one appearance to the next, I{A} denotes the indicator function of the set A, [x] denotes the integer part of x, logx=lnmax{e,x}.
Some lemmas which will be useful to prove the main results are given firstly.
Lemma 2.1. (Wittmann [13]) Let {an} be a sequence of strictly positive real numbers with limn→∞an=∞. Then for any M>1, there exists a subsequence {nk,k≥1}∈N={1,2,⋯}, such that
Mank≤ank+1≤M3ank+1. |
Lemma 2.2. Under the assumptions of Theorem 1.1, let {g(n)} be a nondecreasing sequence of positive numbers and {nk} be a nondecreasing sequence of positive integers such that ∑∞k=11(lognk)1+δ<∞. Then the following statements are equivalent
(A) ∑∞k=1P(Snk>g(nk)√Bnk)<∞,
(B) ∑∞k=11g(nk)exp{−12g2(nk)}<∞.
Proof. Noting Bn=O(n),
∞∑k=1Δnk,0≤∞∑k=1C(logBnk)1+δ≤∞∑k=1C(lognk)1+δ<∞. | (2.1) |
Thanks to (2.1), condition (A) is equivalent to
∞∑k=1(1−Φ(g(nk)))<∞. |
If g(nk)↛∞, it is easy to see that conditions (A) and (B) can not be satisfied. So we can assume that g(nk)→∞, then noting that 1xφ(x)∼1−Φ(x) for x large enough, where φ(x) is the density function of the standard normal, one gets
∞∑k=1(1−Φ(g(nk)))<∞⟺∞∑k=11√2πg(nk)exp{−12g2(nk)}<∞. |
Thus, the proof of this lemma is completed.
Lemma 2.3. Under the conditions of Theorem 1.1, one gets
lim supn→∞|Sn|(2BnloglogBn)1/2≤1a.s. | (2.2) |
Proof. For any 0<ε<1/3, let nk=[ekα],k≥1 with max{1(1+ε)2,11+δ}<α<1 and g(nk)=(1+ε)(2loglogBnk)1/2. Noting that Bn=O(n), one can get
∞∑k=1Δnk,0≤∞∑k=1C(lognk)1+δ≤∞∑k=1Ckα(1+δ)<∞, |
and
∞∑k=11g(nk)exp{−12g(nk)}=∞∑k=11(1+ε)(2loglogBnk)1/2exp{−12(1+ε)2(2loglogBnk)}≤∞∑k=1C(logBnk)(1+ε)2(loglogBnk)1/2≤∞∑k=1Ckα(1+ε)2(logkα)1/2<∞. |
Then by Lemma 2.2, one can obtain
∞∑k=1P(Snk>(1+ε)(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2)<∞. |
By Broel-Cantelli lemma and the arbitrariness of ε, we have
lim supk→∞|Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2=limε↘0lim supk→∞|Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2≤1a.s. | (2.3) |
For given α, choose p>2 such that p(1−α)>2, then by (1.1), Bn=O(n) and supnE|Yn|p<∞, we get
∞∑k=1P(maxnk≤n<nk+1|Sn−Snk|>ε(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2)≤∞∑k=1Emaxnk≤n<nk+1|Sn−Snk|p(ε)p(2BnkloglogBnk)p/2≤∞∑k=1C(nk+1−nk)p/2(nkloglognk)p/2≤∞∑k=1C1kp(1−α)/2(logkα)p/2<∞ |
Thus by Broel-Cantelli lemma and the arbitrariness of ε, one has
lim supk→∞maxnk≤n<nk+1|Sn−Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2=0a.s. | (2.4) |
Thanks to (2.3) and (2.4) and Bnk+1/Bnk→1, we have
lim supn→∞|Sn|(2BnloglogBn)1/2≤lim supk→∞maxnk≤n<nk+1|Sn|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2≤lim supk→∞|Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2+lim supk→∞maxnk≤n<nk+1|Sn−Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2≤1, |
thus, the proof of Lemma 2.3 is completed.
Lemma 2.4. Under the conditions of Theorem 1.1, one gets
lim supn→∞|Sn|(2BnloglogBn)1/2≥1a.s. | (2.5) |
Proof. Noting that Bn=O(n), Bn+1/Bn→1, by Lemma 2.1, for any τ>0, there exists a nondecreasing sequence of positive integers {n′k,k≥1}, such that for k→∞, we have
n′k→∞,andBn′k−1≤(1+τ)k<Bn′k,k=1,2,⋯ | (2.6) |
Let
χ(n′k)=(2Bn′kloglogBn′k)1/2andψ(n′k)=(2(Bn′k−Bn′k−1)loglog(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))1/2. |
From (1.3), it is easy to check that
(1−θ)ψ(n′k)−2χ(n′k−1)∼[(1−θ)τ1/2(1+τ)−1/2−2(1+τ)−1/2]χ(n′k),k→∞, | (2.7) |
For given 0<ε<1, one can choose 0<θ<1 and τ>0, such that
(1−θ)τ1/2(1+τ)−1/2−2(1+τ)−1/2>1−ε. |
Let g(n′k)=(1+ε)(2loglogBn′k)1/2. Noting that Bn=O(n), one can get
∞∑k=1Δn′k,0≤∞∑k=1C(logn′k)1+δ≤∞∑k=1Ck1+δ<∞, |
and
∞∑k=11g(n′k)exp{−12g(n′k)}=∞∑k=11(1+ε)(2loglogBn′k)1/2exp{−12(1+ε)2(2loglogBn′k)}≤∞∑k=1C(logBn′k)(1+ε)2(loglogBn′k)1/2≤∞∑k=1Ck(1+ε)2(logk)1/2<∞. |
Then by Lemma 2.2, one can obtain
∞∑k=1P(Sn′k>(1+ε)(2Bn′kloglogBn′k)1/2)<∞. |
By Broel-Cantelli lemma and 0<ε<1, we have
|Sn′k−1|≤2(2Bn′k−1loglogBn′k−1)1/2=2χ(n′k−1)a.s. | (2.8) |
In order to prove (2.5), it is sufficient to show that
lim supk→∞|Sn′k|(2Bn′kloglogBn′k)1/2≥1a.s. | (2.9) |
Noting (1−θ)τ1/2(1+τ)−1/2−2(1+τ)−1/2>1−ε, then by (2.6) and (2.8) and P(AB)≥P(A)−P(¯B), it is easy to prove
P(Sn′k>(1−ε)χ(n′k)i.o.)≥P(Sn′k>(1−θ)ψ(n′k)−2χ(n′k−1)i.o.)≥P(Sn′k−Sn′k−1>(1−θ)ψ(n′k)i.o.)−P(|Sn′k−1|≥2χ(n′k−1)i.o.)=P(Sn′k−Sn′k−1>(1−θ)ψ(n′k)i.o.). | (2.10) |
Thus by (2.10), in order to prove (2.9), it suffices to prove
P(Sn′k−Sn′k−1>(1−θ)ψ(n′k)i.o.)=1. | (2.11) |
Noting Δn,m=supx|P(Sn+m−Sm<x√Bn+m−Bm)−Φ(x)|=O[(log(Bn+m−Bm))−1−δ] and 1xφ(x)≤1−Φ(x) for x≥1, where φ(x) is the density function of the standard normal random variables, recall ψ(n′k)=(2(Bn′k−Bn′k−1)loglog(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))1/2 and Bn′k∼(1+τ)k, one can deduce
∞∑k=1P(Sn′k−Sn′k−1>(1−θ)ψ(n′k))≥∞∑k=1[1−Φ((1−θ)(2loglog(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))1/2)−Δn′k−n′k−1,n′k−1)]≥∞∑k=1[1√2π(1−θ)(2loglog(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))1/2⋅e−(1−θ)2(2loglog(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))2−C(log(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))1+δ]≥∞∑k=1C(log(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))(1−θ)2(loglog(Bn′k−Bn′k−1))1/2≥∞∑k=1Ck(1−θ)2(logk)1/2=∞. | (2.12) |
Hence, by the generalized Borel-Cantelli lemma (see, e.g., Kochen and Stone [14]), (2.12) yields (2.11), the proof is completed.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Theorem 1.1 can be obtained by combining Lemma 2.3 with Lemma 2.4 directly.
Proof of Corollary 1.2. By the strictly stationary and 0<σ2=:EY21+∑∞k=1EY1Y1+k<∞, it is easy to see
limn→∞Bnn=limn→∞Var(Sn)n=σ2. |
Then Corollary 1.2 follows from Theorem 1.1.
In this paper, using the Rosenthal type maximal inequality and Berry-Esseen bounds, the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variables is established, this extends the results of Cai and Wu [12] from NA case to general case, because that END and NSD random variables are much weaker than independent random variables and NA random variables thanking to Shen [7] and Shen et al. [9] for details.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11771178) and Science and Technology Program of Jilin Educational Department during the "13th Five-Year'' Plan Period (Grant No. JJKH20200951KJ).
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
M. Peligrad, Convergence rates of the strong law for stationary mixing sequences, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Gebiete, 70 (1985), 307-314. doi: 10.1007/BF02451434
![]() |
[2] |
X. Zhou, Complete moment convergence of moving average processes under φ-mixing assumptions, Stat. Probabil. Lett., 80 (2010), 285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2009.10.018
![]() |
[3] |
J. F. Wang, F. B. Lu, Inequalities of maximum of partial sums and weak convergence for a class of weak dependent random variables, Acta. Math. Sin., 22 (2006), 693-700. doi: 10.1007/s10114-005-0601-x
![]() |
[4] |
S. Utev, M. Peligrad, Maximal inequalities and an invariance principle for a class of weakly dependent random variables, J. Theor. Probab., 16 (2003), 101-115. doi: 10.1023/A:1022278404634
![]() |
[5] |
Q. M. Shao, A comparison theorem on moment inequalities between negatively associated and independent random variables, J. Theor. Probab., 13 (2000), 343-356. doi: 10.1023/A:1007849609234
![]() |
[6] |
G. Stoica, A note on the rate of convergence in the strong law of large numbers for martingales, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 381 (2011), 910-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.04.008
![]() |
[7] |
A. T. Shen, Probability inequalities for END sequence and their applications, J. Inequal. Appl., 2011 (2011), 98. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2011-98
![]() |
[8] |
D. M. Yuan, J. An, Rosenthal type inequalities for asymptotically almost negatively associated random variables and applications, Sci. China Ser. A, 52 (2009), 1887-1904. doi: 10.1007/s11425-009-0154-z
![]() |
[9] |
A. T. Shen, Y. Zhang, A. Volodin, Applications of the Rosenthal-type inequality for negatively superadditive dependent random variables, Metrika, 78 (2015), 295-311. doi: 10.1007/s00184-014-0503-y
![]() |
[10] | F. Merlevˊede, M. Peligrad, Rosenthal-type inequalities for the maximum of partial sums of stationary processes and examples, Ann. Probab., 41 (2013), 914-960. |
[11] | V. V. Petrov, Limit theorems of probability theory: Sequences of independent random variables, Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, 1995. |
[12] |
G. H. Cai, H. Wu, Law of iterated logarithm for NA sequences with non-identical distributions, Proc. Math. Sci., 117 (2007), 213-218. doi: 10.1007/s12044-007-0017-x
![]() |
[13] |
R. Wittmann, A general law of iterated logarithm, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Gebiete, 68 (1985), 521-543. doi: 10.1007/BF00535343
![]() |
[14] | S. Kochen, C. Stone, A note on the Borel-Cantelli lemma, Illinois J. Math., 8 (1964), 248-251. |