Processing math: 100%
Research article

The law of iterated logarithm for a class of random variables satisfying Rosenthal type inequality

  • Received: 06 June 2021 Accepted: 28 July 2021 Published: 02 August 2021
  • MSC : 60F05, 60F15

  • Let {Yn,n1} be sequence of random variables with EYn=0 and supnE|Yn|p< for each p>2 satisfying Rosenthal type inequality. In this paper, the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variable sequence with non-identical distributions is established by the Rosenthal type inequality and Berry-Esseen bounds. The results extend the known ones from i.i.d and NA cases to a class of random variable satisfying Rosenthal type inequality.

    Citation: Haichao Yu, Yong Zhang. The law of iterated logarithm for a class of random variables satisfying Rosenthal type inequality[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11076-11083. doi: 10.3934/math.2021642

    Related Papers:

    [1] Qunying Wu . The convergence rate for the laws of logarithms under sub-linear expectations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24786-24801. doi: 10.3934/math.20231264
    [2] Khuram Ali Khan, Shaista Ayaz, İmdat İşcan, Nehad Ali Shah, Wajaree Weera . Applications of Hölder-İşcan inequality for $ n $-times differentiable $ (s, m) $-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1620-1635. doi: 10.3934/math.2023082
    [3] Pinhong Long, Xing Li, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Wenshuai Wang . The Fekete-Szegö type inequalities for certain subclasses analytic functions associated with petal shaped region. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6087-6106. doi: 10.3934/math.2021357
    [4] Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Sheza.M. El-Deeb, Daniel Breaz, Wali Khan Mashwani, Bakhtiar Ahmad . Sufficiency criteria for a class of convex functions connected with tangent function. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18608-18624. doi: 10.3934/math.2024906
    [5] Xueping Hu, Jingya Wang . A Berry-Ess$\acute{e}$n bound of wavelet estimation for a nonparametric regression model under linear process errors based on LNQD sequence. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6985-6995. doi: 10.3934/math.2020448
    [6] Yi Wu, Duoduo Zhao . Law of the single logarithm for randomly weighted sums of dependent sequences and an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 10141-10156. doi: 10.3934/math.2024496
    [7] Chunyan Luo, Yuping Yu, Tingsong Du . Estimates of bounds on the weighted Simpson type inequality and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4644-4661. doi: 10.3934/math.2020298
    [8] Feng Qi, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Gauhar Rahman . Convexity and inequalities related to extended beta and confluent hypergeometric functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1499-1507. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1499
    [9] Muhammmad Ghaffar Khan, Wali Khan Mashwani, Jong-Suk Ro, Bakhtiar Ahmad . Problems concerning sharp coefficient functionals of bounded turning functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27396-27413. doi: 10.3934/math.20231402
    [10] Sarra Toualbia, Abderrahmane Zaraï, Salah Boulaaras . Decay estimate and non-extinction of solutions of p-Laplacian nonlocal heat equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1663-1679. doi: 10.3934/math.2020112
  • Let {Yn,n1} be sequence of random variables with EYn=0 and supnE|Yn|p< for each p>2 satisfying Rosenthal type inequality. In this paper, the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variable sequence with non-identical distributions is established by the Rosenthal type inequality and Berry-Esseen bounds. The results extend the known ones from i.i.d and NA cases to a class of random variable satisfying Rosenthal type inequality.



    We first introduce the definition of the Rosenthal type maximal inequality, which is one of the most interesting inequalities in probability theory and mathematical statistics. Suppose that {Yn,n1} is a sequence of random variables satisfying E|Yi|r< for r2, then there exists a positive constant C(r) depending only on r such that

    Emax1jn|jk=1(YkEYk)|rC(r)[nk=1E|YkEYk|r+(nk=1E|YkEYk|2)r/2]2C(r)nr/2supnE|YnEYn|r. (1.1)

    (1.1) can be satisfied by many dependent or mixing sequences. Peligrad [1], Zhou [2], Wang and Lu [3], Utev and Peligrad [4] established the above inequality for ρmixing sequence, φmixing sequence, ρmixing sequence and ˜ρmixing sequence, respectively. We also refer to Shao [5], Stoica [6], Shen [7], Yuan and An [8], Shen et al. [9] and Merlevˊede and Peligrad [10] for negatively associated sequence (NA), martingale difference sequence, extend negatively dependent sequence (END), asymptotically almost negatively associated random sequence (AANA), negatively superadditive dependent (NSD), stationary processes, respectively.

    The law of iterated logarithm (LIL, for short) is an important aspect in probability theory because it can describe the precise convergence rates. Petrov [11] established the following LIL for independent random variables.

    Theorem A. Let {Xn,n1} be independent random variables sequences with EXn=0, σ2n=EX2n<, Bn=nk=1σ2k, Sn=nk=1Xk. If the following assumptions are satisfied:

    (i) Bn, when n,

    (ii) Bn+1/Bn1, when n,

    (iii) Δn=supx|P(Sn<xBn)Φ(x)|=O[(logBn)1δ], δ>0, here and in the sequel Φ() is a standard normal distribution function, hold.

    Then

    lim supnSn(2BnloglogBn)1/2=1a.s.

    Later on, Cai and Wu [12] established the following LIL for NA random variables.

    Theorem B. Let {Xn,n1} be NA random variables sequence with EXn=0 and supnEX2n(log|Xn|)1+δ< for some δ>0. Let Sn=nk=1Xk, Bn=Var(Sn)>0, Bn=nk=1EX2k. Δn=supx|P(Sn<xBn)Φ(x)|. If

    (i) Bn=O(n),

    (ii) Bn+1/Bn1, when n,

    (iii) Δn=O[(logBn)1],

    (iv) Bn/Bn1, when n,

    hold, then

    lim supnSn(2BnloglogBn)1/2=1a.s.

    In this paper, the main purpose is to establish the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variables satisfying Rosenthal type maximal inequality with non-identical distributions. The following is the main result.

    Theorem 1.1. Let {Yn,n1} be a sequence of random variables with EYn=0 and supnE|Yn|p< for each p>2 satisfying (1.1), denote Sn=nk=1Yk, Bn=Var(Sn)>0. If

    (i) Bn=O(n), Bn+1/Bn1, when n,

    (ii) Δn,m=supx|P(Sn+mSm<xBn+mBm)Φ(x)|=O[(log(Bn+mBm))1δ] for some δ>0 and any m0, n1, where S0=0, B0=0,

    hold, then

    lim supnSn(2BnloglogBn)1/2=1a.s. (1.2)

    Corollary 1.2. Let {Yn,n1} be a strictly stationary sequence of random variables with EY1=0 and E|Y1|p< for each p>2 satisfying (1.1), denote Sn=nk=1Yk, Bn=Var(Sn)>0. If

    (i) 0<σ2=:EY21+k=1EY1Y1+k<,

    (ii) Δn=supx|P(Sn<xBn)Φ(x)|=O[(logBn)1δ] for some δ>0,

    hold, then

    lim supnSn(2nσ2loglogn)1/2=1a.s. (1.3)

    Remark 1.3. The assumption (ii) in Theorem 1.1, that is the Berry-Esseen bounds, can be satisfied by many sequence, such as independent sequence, NA sequence with convergence rate nα, 0<α1/2.

    Throughout the sequel, C represents a positive constant although its value may change from one appearance to the next, I{A} denotes the indicator function of the set A, [x] denotes the integer part of x, logx=lnmax{e,x}.

    Some lemmas which will be useful to prove the main results are given firstly.

    Lemma 2.1. (Wittmann [13]) Let {an} be a sequence of strictly positive real numbers with limnan=. Then for any M>1, there exists a subsequence {nk,k1}N={1,2,}, such that

    Mankank+1M3ank+1.

    Lemma 2.2. Under the assumptions of Theorem 1.1, let {g(n)} be a nondecreasing sequence of positive numbers and {nk} be a nondecreasing sequence of positive integers such that k=11(lognk)1+δ<. Then the following statements are equivalent

    (A) k=1P(Snk>g(nk)Bnk)<,

    (B) k=11g(nk)exp{12g2(nk)}<.

    Proof. Noting Bn=O(n),

    k=1Δnk,0k=1C(logBnk)1+δk=1C(lognk)1+δ<. (2.1)

    Thanks to (2.1), condition (A) is equivalent to

    k=1(1Φ(g(nk)))<.

    If g(nk), it is easy to see that conditions (A) and (B) can not be satisfied. So we can assume that g(nk), then noting that 1xφ(x)1Φ(x) for x large enough, where φ(x) is the density function of the standard normal, one gets

    k=1(1Φ(g(nk)))<k=112πg(nk)exp{12g2(nk)}<.

    Thus, the proof of this lemma is completed.

    Lemma 2.3. Under the conditions of Theorem 1.1, one gets

    lim supn|Sn|(2BnloglogBn)1/21a.s. (2.2)

    Proof. For any 0<ε<1/3, let nk=[ekα],k1 with max{1(1+ε)2,11+δ}<α<1 and g(nk)=(1+ε)(2loglogBnk)1/2. Noting that Bn=O(n), one can get

    k=1Δnk,0k=1C(lognk)1+δk=1Ckα(1+δ)<,

    and

    k=11g(nk)exp{12g(nk)}=k=11(1+ε)(2loglogBnk)1/2exp{12(1+ε)2(2loglogBnk)}k=1C(logBnk)(1+ε)2(loglogBnk)1/2k=1Ckα(1+ε)2(logkα)1/2<.

    Then by Lemma 2.2, one can obtain

    k=1P(Snk>(1+ε)(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2)<.

    By Broel-Cantelli lemma and the arbitrariness of ε, we have

    lim supk|Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2=limε0lim supk|Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/21a.s. (2.3)

    For given α, choose p>2 such that p(1α)>2, then by (1.1), Bn=O(n) and supnE|Yn|p<, we get

    k=1P(maxnkn<nk+1|SnSnk|>ε(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2)k=1Emaxnkn<nk+1|SnSnk|p(ε)p(2BnkloglogBnk)p/2k=1C(nk+1nk)p/2(nkloglognk)p/2k=1C1kp(1α)/2(logkα)p/2<

    Thus by Broel-Cantelli lemma and the arbitrariness of ε, one has

    lim supkmaxnkn<nk+1|SnSnk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2=0a.s. (2.4)

    Thanks to (2.3) and (2.4) and Bnk+1/Bnk1, we have

    lim supn|Sn|(2BnloglogBn)1/2lim supkmaxnkn<nk+1|Sn|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2lim supk|Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2+lim supkmaxnkn<nk+1|SnSnk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/21,

    thus, the proof of Lemma 2.3 is completed.

    Lemma 2.4. Under the conditions of Theorem 1.1, one gets

    lim supn|Sn|(2BnloglogBn)1/21a.s. (2.5)

    Proof. Noting that Bn=O(n), Bn+1/Bn1, by Lemma 2.1, for any τ>0, there exists a nondecreasing sequence of positive integers {nk,k1}, such that for k, we have

    nk,andBnk1(1+τ)k<Bnk,k=1,2, (2.6)

    Let

    χ(nk)=(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2andψ(nk)=(2(BnkBnk1)loglog(BnkBnk1))1/2.

    From (1.3), it is easy to check that

    (1θ)ψ(nk)2χ(nk1)[(1θ)τ1/2(1+τ)1/22(1+τ)1/2]χ(nk),k, (2.7)

    For given 0<ε<1, one can choose 0<θ<1 and τ>0, such that

    (1θ)τ1/2(1+τ)1/22(1+τ)1/2>1ε.

    Let g(nk)=(1+ε)(2loglogBnk)1/2. Noting that Bn=O(n), one can get

    k=1Δnk,0k=1C(lognk)1+δk=1Ck1+δ<,

    and

    k=11g(nk)exp{12g(nk)}=k=11(1+ε)(2loglogBnk)1/2exp{12(1+ε)2(2loglogBnk)}k=1C(logBnk)(1+ε)2(loglogBnk)1/2k=1Ck(1+ε)2(logk)1/2<.

    Then by Lemma 2.2, one can obtain

    k=1P(Snk>(1+ε)(2BnkloglogBnk)1/2)<.

    By Broel-Cantelli lemma and 0<ε<1, we have

    |Snk1|2(2Bnk1loglogBnk1)1/2=2χ(nk1)a.s. (2.8)

    In order to prove (2.5), it is sufficient to show that

    lim supk|Snk|(2BnkloglogBnk)1/21a.s. (2.9)

    Noting (1θ)τ1/2(1+τ)1/22(1+τ)1/2>1ε, then by (2.6) and (2.8) and P(AB)P(A)P(¯B), it is easy to prove

    P(Snk>(1ε)χ(nk)i.o.)P(Snk>(1θ)ψ(nk)2χ(nk1)i.o.)P(SnkSnk1>(1θ)ψ(nk)i.o.)P(|Snk1|2χ(nk1)i.o.)=P(SnkSnk1>(1θ)ψ(nk)i.o.). (2.10)

    Thus by (2.10), in order to prove (2.9), it suffices to prove

    P(SnkSnk1>(1θ)ψ(nk)i.o.)=1. (2.11)

    Noting Δn,m=supx|P(Sn+mSm<xBn+mBm)Φ(x)|=O[(log(Bn+mBm))1δ] and 1xφ(x)1Φ(x) for x1, where φ(x) is the density function of the standard normal random variables, recall ψ(nk)=(2(BnkBnk1)loglog(BnkBnk1))1/2 and Bnk(1+τ)k, one can deduce

    k=1P(SnkSnk1>(1θ)ψ(nk))k=1[1Φ((1θ)(2loglog(BnkBnk1))1/2)Δnknk1,nk1)]k=1[12π(1θ)(2loglog(BnkBnk1))1/2e(1θ)2(2loglog(BnkBnk1))2C(log(BnkBnk1))1+δ]k=1C(log(BnkBnk1))(1θ)2(loglog(BnkBnk1))1/2k=1Ck(1θ)2(logk)1/2=. (2.12)

    Hence, by the generalized Borel-Cantelli lemma (see, e.g., Kochen and Stone [14]), (2.12) yields (2.11), the proof is completed.

    Proof of Theorem 1.1. Theorem 1.1 can be obtained by combining Lemma 2.3 with Lemma 2.4 directly.

    Proof of Corollary 1.2. By the strictly stationary and 0<σ2=:EY21+k=1EY1Y1+k<, it is easy to see

    limnBnn=limnVar(Sn)n=σ2.

    Then Corollary 1.2 follows from Theorem 1.1.

    In this paper, using the Rosenthal type maximal inequality and Berry-Esseen bounds, the law of the iterated logarithm for a class of random variables is established, this extends the results of Cai and Wu [12] from NA case to general case, because that END and NSD random variables are much weaker than independent random variables and NA random variables thanking to Shen [7] and Shen et al. [9] for details.

    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11771178) and Science and Technology Program of Jilin Educational Department during the "13th Five-Year'' Plan Period (Grant No. JJKH20200951KJ).

    The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.



    [1] M. Peligrad, Convergence rates of the strong law for stationary mixing sequences, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Gebiete, 70 (1985), 307-314. doi: 10.1007/BF02451434
    [2] X. Zhou, Complete moment convergence of moving average processes under φ-mixing assumptions, Stat. Probabil. Lett., 80 (2010), 285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2009.10.018
    [3] J. F. Wang, F. B. Lu, Inequalities of maximum of partial sums and weak convergence for a class of weak dependent random variables, Acta. Math. Sin., 22 (2006), 693-700. doi: 10.1007/s10114-005-0601-x
    [4] S. Utev, M. Peligrad, Maximal inequalities and an invariance principle for a class of weakly dependent random variables, J. Theor. Probab., 16 (2003), 101-115. doi: 10.1023/A:1022278404634
    [5] Q. M. Shao, A comparison theorem on moment inequalities between negatively associated and independent random variables, J. Theor. Probab., 13 (2000), 343-356. doi: 10.1023/A:1007849609234
    [6] G. Stoica, A note on the rate of convergence in the strong law of large numbers for martingales, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 381 (2011), 910-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.04.008
    [7] A. T. Shen, Probability inequalities for END sequence and their applications, J. Inequal. Appl., 2011 (2011), 98. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2011-98
    [8] D. M. Yuan, J. An, Rosenthal type inequalities for asymptotically almost negatively associated random variables and applications, Sci. China Ser. A, 52 (2009), 1887-1904. doi: 10.1007/s11425-009-0154-z
    [9] A. T. Shen, Y. Zhang, A. Volodin, Applications of the Rosenthal-type inequality for negatively superadditive dependent random variables, Metrika, 78 (2015), 295-311. doi: 10.1007/s00184-014-0503-y
    [10] F. Merlevˊede, M. Peligrad, Rosenthal-type inequalities for the maximum of partial sums of stationary processes and examples, Ann. Probab., 41 (2013), 914-960.
    [11] V. V. Petrov, Limit theorems of probability theory: Sequences of independent random variables, Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, 1995.
    [12] G. H. Cai, H. Wu, Law of iterated logarithm for NA sequences with non-identical distributions, Proc. Math. Sci., 117 (2007), 213-218. doi: 10.1007/s12044-007-0017-x
    [13] R. Wittmann, A general law of iterated logarithm, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Gebiete, 68 (1985), 521-543. doi: 10.1007/BF00535343
    [14] S. Kochen, C. Stone, A note on the Borel-Cantelli lemma, Illinois J. Math., 8 (1964), 248-251.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2478) PDF downloads(79) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog