Research article

Some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for generalized harmonically convex functions involving local fractional integrals

  • Received: 29 May 2021 Accepted: 20 July 2021 Published: 23 July 2021
  • MSC : 26D15, 26A51, 26D10

  • In this paper, we establish a new integral identity involving local fractional integral on Yang's fractal sets. Using this integral identity, some new generalized Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities whose function is monotonically increasing and generalized harmonically convex are obtained. Finally, we construct some generalized special means to explain the applications of these inequalities.

    Citation: Wenbing Sun, Rui Xu. Some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for generalized harmonically convex functions involving local fractional integrals[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10679-10695. doi: 10.3934/math.2021620

    Related Papers:

    [1] Thongchai Botmart, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Muhammad Amer Latif, Fahd Jarad, Artion Kashuri . Certain midpoint-type Fejér and Hermite-Hadamard inclusions involving fractional integrals with an exponential function in kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5616-5638. doi: 10.3934/math.2023283
    [2] Eze R. Nwaeze, Muhammad Adil Khan, Ali Ahmadian, Mohammad Nazir Ahmad, Ahmad Kamil Mahmood . Fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for $ m $-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1889-1904. doi: 10.3934/math.2021115
    [3] Sabila Ali, Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Ahmed Morsy, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Sunil Dutt Purohit, M. Zakarya . Dynamical significance of generalized fractional integral inequalities via convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9705-9730. doi: 10.3934/math.2021565
    [4] Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Artion Kashuri, Hüseyin Budak . Generalizations of fractional Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer like inequalities for convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9397-9421. doi: 10.3934/math.2021546
    [5] Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani, Abdullahi Yusuf . The generalization of Hermite-Hadamard type Inequality with exp-convexity involving non-singular fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7040-7055. doi: 10.3934/math.2022392
    [6] Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu . New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6874-6901. doi: 10.3934/math.2020441
    [7] Chun-Ying He, Aying Wan, Bai-Ni Guo . Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for harmonic-arithmetic extended $ (s_1, m_1) $-$ (s_2, m_2) $ coordinated convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17027-17037. doi: 10.3934/math.2023869
    [8] Yousaf Khurshid, Muhammad Adil Khan, Yu-Ming Chu . Conformable fractional integral inequalities for GG- and GA-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5012-5030. doi: 10.3934/math.2020322
    [9] Jia-Bao Liu, Saad Ihsan Butt, Jamshed Nasir, Adnan Aslam, Asfand Fahad, Jarunee Soontharanon . Jensen-Mercer variant of Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities via Atangana-Baleanu fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2123-2141. doi: 10.3934/math.2022121
    [10] Thabet Abdeljawad, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Artion Kashuri . On inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer type involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 712-725. doi: 10.3934/math.2021043
  • In this paper, we establish a new integral identity involving local fractional integral on Yang's fractal sets. Using this integral identity, some new generalized Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities whose function is monotonically increasing and generalized harmonically convex are obtained. Finally, we construct some generalized special means to explain the applications of these inequalities.



    Let ϕ:IRR be a convex function and α,βI with α<β, then the following inequality holds,

    ϕ(α+β2)1βαβαϕ(x)dxϕ(α)+ϕ(β)2, (1.1)

    which is well known as Hermite-Hadamard's inequality [1] for convex functions. Both inequalities hold in the reversed direction if ϕ is concave.

    Convex function is an important function in mathematical analysis and has been applied in many aspects [2,3]. With the extension of the definition of convex function, Hermite-Hadamard's inequality has been deeply studied. Some improvement and generalizations for Hermite-Hadamard's inequality (1.1) can been found in the references [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].

    In [11], İşcan gave the definition of harmonically convexity as follows:

    Definition 1. Let IR{0} be a real interval. A function ϕ:IR is said to be harmonically convex, if

    ϕ(xytx+(1t)y)tϕ(y)+(1t)ϕ(x) (1.2)

    for all x,yI and t[0,1]. If the inequality in (1.2) is reversed, then ϕ is said to be harmonically concave.

    In recent years, many researchers presented many kinds of fractional calculus by different methods and explored their applications. For example, Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and its applications in inequalities [13,14,15,16]. Recently, Yang stated the theory of local fractional calculus on Yang's fractal sets systematically in [17,18,19]. Local fractional calculus can explain the behavior of continuous but nowhere differentiable function. In view of the special advantages of local fractional calculus, more and more researchers extended their studies to Yang's fractal space, see [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].

    In [22], Sun introduced the definition of the generalized harmonically convex function on Yang's fractal sets as follows:

    Definition 2. Let IR{0} be a real interval. A function ϕ:IRϵ(0<ϵ1) is said to be generalized harmonically convex, if

    ϕ(xytx+(1t)y)tϵϕ(y)+(1t)ϵϕ(x) (1.3)

    for all x,yI and t[0,1]. If the inequality in (1.3) is reversed, then ϕ is said to be generalized harmonically concave. The sign ϵ represents the fractal dimension.

    Example 1. Let ϕ:(0,)Rϵ and ψ:(,0)Rϵ, then ϕ(x)=xϵ is a generalized harmonically convex function and ψ(x)=xϵ is a generalized harmonically concave function.

    The following result related to Hermite-Hadamard's inequalities holds.

    Theorem 1. [22] Let ϕ:IR{0}Rϵ be a generalized harmonically convex function on fractal space and α,βI with α<β. If ϕ(x)I(ϵ)x[α,β], then

    1Γ(1+ϵ)ϕ(2αβα+β)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)[ϕ(α)+ϕ(β)]. (1.4)

    Based on the theory of local fractional calculus and the definition of the generalized harmonically convex function on Yang's fractal sets, the main aim of this paper is using a new integral identity and monotonicity of functions to establish some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities involving local fractional calculus.

    Let Rϵ(0<ϵ1) be ϵ-type set of the real line numbers on Yang's fractal sets, and give the following operation rules, see[17,18]. The sign ϵ represents the fractal dimension, not the exponential sign.

    If αϵ,βϵ,γϵRϵ, then addition and multiplication operations satisfy

    (a) αϵ+βϵRϵ, αϵβϵRϵ,

    (b) αϵ+βϵ=βϵ+αϵ=(α+β)ϵ=(β+α)ϵ,

    (c) αϵ+(βϵ+γϵ)=(α+β)ϵ+γϵ,

    (d) αϵβϵ=βϵαϵ=(αβ)ϵ=(βα)ϵ,

    (e) αϵ(βϵγϵ)=(αϵβϵ)γϵ,

    (f) αϵ(βϵ+γϵ)=αϵβϵ+αϵγϵ,

    (g) αϵ+0ϵ=αϵ, αϵ+(α)ϵ=0ϵ and αϵ1ϵ=1ϵαϵ=αϵ,

    (h) (αβ)ϵ=αϵβϵ.

    Definition 3. [18,19] If there exists the relation

    |ϕ(x)ϕ(x0)|<εϵ

    with |xx0|<δ, for ε,δ>0 and ε,δR.Then the function ϕ(x) is called local fractional continuous at x0. If ϕ(x) is local fractional continuous on (α,β), we denote by ϕ(x)Cϵ(α,β).

    Definition 4. [17,19] Supposing that ϕ(x)Cϵ(α,β), the local fractional derivative of ϕ(x) of order ϵ at x=x0 is defined by

    ϕ(ϵ)(x0)=dϵϕ(x)dxϵ|x=x0=limxx0Γ(ϵ+1)(ϕ(x)ϕ(x0))(xx0)ϵ.

    For any x(α,β), there exists ϕ(ϵ)(x)=D(ϵ)x, denoted by ϕ(ϵ)(x)D(ϵ)x(α,β). Dϵ(α,β) is called ϵ-local fractional derivative set. If there exits ϕ((n+1)ϵ)(x)=(n+1)timesDϵxDϵxϕ(x) for any xIR, then we denote ϕD(n+1)ϵ(I), where n=0,1,2,

    Definition 5. [17,19] Let ϕ(x)Cϵ[α,β]. The local fractional integral of function ϕ(x) of order ϵ is defined by

    αI(ϵ)βϕ(x)=1Γ(ϵ+1)βαϕ(t)(dt)ϵ=1Γ(ϵ+1)limΔt0N1j=0f(tj)(Δtj)ϵ,

    where α=t0<t1<<tN1<tN=β,[tj,tj+1] is a partition of the interval [α,β], Δtj=tj+1tj,Δt=max{Δt0,Δt1ΔtN1}.

    Note that αI(ϵ)αϕ(x)=0, and αI(ϵ)βϕ(x)=βI(ϵ)αϕ(x) if α<β. We denote ϕ(x)I(ϵ)x[α,β] if there exits αI(ϵ)xϕ(x) for any x(α,β).

    Lemma 1. [17]

    (1) Suppose that ϕ(x)=φ(ϵ)(x)Cϵ[α,β], then

    αI(ϵ)βϕ(x)=φ(β)φ(α).

    (2) (Local fractional integration by parts)

    Suppose that ϕ(x),φ(x)Dϵ(α,β), and ϕ(ϵ)(x),φ(ϵ)(x)Cϵ[α,β], then

    αI(ϵ)βϕ(x)φ(ϵ)(x)=[ϕ(x)φ(x)]|βααI(ϵ)βϕ(ϵ)(x)φ(x).

    Lemma 2. [17] Suppose that ϕ(x)Cϵ[α,β] and α<γ<β, then

    αI(ϵ)βϕ(x)=αI(ϵ)γϕ(x)+γI(ϵ)βϕ(x).

    Lemma 3. [17]

    dϵxkϵdxϵ=Γ(1+kϵ)Γ(1+(k1)ϵ)x(k1)ϵ;
    1Γ(ϵ+1)βαxkϵ(dx)ϵ=Γ(1+kϵ)Γ(1+(k+1)ϵ)(β(k+1)ϵα(k+1)ϵ),k>0.

    Lemma 4. [18,30] (Generalized Hölder's inequality) Let ϕ,φCϵ[α,β],p,q>1, with 1p+1q=1, then

    1Γ(ϵ+1)βα|ϕ(x)φ(x)|(dx)ϵ(1Γ(ϵ+1)βα|ϕ(x)|p(dx)ϵ)1/p(1Γ(ϵ+1)βα|φ(x)|q(dx)ϵ)1/q.

    Lemma 5. [17]

    αI(ϵ)β1ϵ=(βα)ϵΓ(1+ϵ).

    Let us introduce the special functions on Yang's fractal sets as follows:

    (1) The generalized Beta function is given by

    Bϵ(x,y)=1Γ(1+ϵ)10t(x1)ϵ(1t)(y1)ϵ(dt)ϵ,x>0,y>0,

    (2) The generalized hypergeometric function is given by

    2Fϵ1(α,β;γ;z)=1Bϵ(β,γβ)1Γ(1+ϵ)10t(β1)ϵ(1t)(γβ1)ϵ(1zt)αϵ(dt)ϵ,γ>β>0,|z|<1.

    For convenience, we use the symbol At to denote tα+(1t)β in the following sections.

    Lemma 6. Let I(0,) be an interval, ϕ:IRϵ (I is the interior of I) such that ϕDϵ(I) and ϕ(ϵ)Cϵ(α,β) for α,βI with α<β. Then the following equality holds

    ϕ(2αβα+β)Γ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ=I1+I2+I3, (3.1)

    where

    I1=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)1/20ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)(dt)ϵ(At)2ϵ,I2=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)11/2ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)(dt)ϵ(At)2ϵ,I3=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(12t)ϵϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)(dt)ϵ(At)2ϵ.

    Proof. Calculating I1,I2, from Lemma 1(1), we get

    I1=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)1/20ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)(dt)ϵ(At)2ϵ=1ϵ2ϵϕ(αβAt)|1/20=1ϵ2ϵ[ϕ(2αβα+β)ϕ(α)]

    and

    I2=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)11/2ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)(dt)ϵ(At)2ϵ=1ϵ2ϵϕ(αβAt)|11/2=1ϵ2ϵ[ϕ(2αβα+β)ϕ(β)].

    Calculating I3, by the local fractional integration by parts, we have

    I3=αϵβϵ(αβ)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(12t)ϵ(At)2ϵϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)(dt)ϵ=(2t1)ϵ2ϵϕ(αβAt)|101Γ(1+ϵ)10Γ(1+ϵ)ϕ(αβAt)(dt)ϵ=ϕ(α)+ϕ(β)2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+ϵ)10ϕ(αβtα+(1t)β)(dt)ϵ.

    Using changing variable with x=αβAt, we have

    I3=ϕ(α)+ϕ(β)2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)(αββα)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)βαϕ(x)x2ϵ(dx)ϵ=ϕ(α)+ϕ(β)2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ.

    Adding I1I3, the desired result is obtained. This completes the proof.

    Theorem 2. Let I(0,) be an interval, ϕ:IRϵ (I is the interior of I) is an increasing function on I such that ϕDϵ(I) and ϕ(ϵ)Cϵ[α,β] for α,βI with α<β. If |ϕ(ϵ)|q is generalized harmonically convex on [α,β] for some fixed q>1, then for all x[α,β], the following local fractional integrals inequality holds,

    |ϕ(2αβα+β)Γ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ|ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ+αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ(Kϵ1(α,β))11q(Kϵ2(α,β)|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q+Kϵ3(α,β)|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q)1q, (3.2)

    where

    Kϵ1(α,β)=β2ϵ[2Fϵ1(2,1;3;12(1αβ))Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)+2Fϵ1(2,2;3;1αβ)2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)2Fϵ1(2,1;2;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ)],Kα2(α,β)=β2ϵ[12ϵ2Fϵ1(2,2;4;12(1αβ))(Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+3ϵ))+2ϵ2Fϵ1(2,3;4;1αβ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+3ϵ)2Fϵ1(2,2;3;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)],Kϵ3(α,β)=β2ϵ[2Fϵ1(2,1;3;12(1αβ))Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)+2ϵ2Fϵ1(2,2;4;1αβ)(Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+3ϵ))2Fϵ1(2,1;3;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)].

    Proof. Since ϕ is an increasing function on I, and 0<α<2αβα+β<β, we can obtain

    ϕ(α)<ϕ(2αβα+β)<ϕ(β).

    From the proof of Lemma 6, we have

    |I1|+|I2|=ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ. (3.3)

    Taking modulus in equality (3.1), we obtain

    |ϕ(2αβα+β)Γ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ||I1|+|I2|+|I3|=ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ+|I3|. (3.4)

    From Lemma 6, using the property of the modulus and the generalized Hölder's inequality, we have

    |I3|=|αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(12t)ϵϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)(dt)ϵ(At)2ϵ|αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10|(12t)ϵA2ϵt||ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵ=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10|(12t)ϵA2ϵt|(11q)+1q|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵαϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[1Γ(1+ϵ)10|(12t)ϵA2ϵt|(dt)ϵ]11q[1Γ(1+ϵ)10|(12t)ϵA2ϵt||ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ]1q. (3.5)

    Since |ϕ(ϵ)|q is generalized harmonically convex on [α,β], thus

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10|(12t)ϵA2ϵt||ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10|(12t)ϵA2ϵt|(tϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q+(1t)ϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q)(dt)ϵ=(1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵtϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ)|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q+(1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵ(1t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ)|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q. (3.6)

    By calculating, we get

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=1Γ(1+ϵ)120(12t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)112(2t1)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)120(12t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)10(2t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)101ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=β2ϵ[1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1u)ϵ(1u2(1αβ))2ϵ(du)ϵ+2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)10tϵ(1(1αβ)t)2ϵ(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1(1αβ)t)2ϵ(dt)ϵ]=β2ϵ[2Fϵ1(2,1;3;12(1αβ))Bϵ(1,2)+2ϵ2Fϵ1(2,2;3;1αβ)Bϵ(2,1)2Fϵ1(2,1;2;1αβ)Bϵ(1,1)]=β2ϵ[2Fϵ1(2,1;3;12(1αβ))Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)+2Fϵ1(2,2;3;1αβ)2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)2Fϵ1(2,1;2;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ)]=Kϵ1(α,β). (3.7)

    Similarly, we get

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵtϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=1Γ(1+ϵ)120(12t)ϵtϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)112(2t1)ϵtϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)120tϵ(12t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)102ϵt2ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=β2ϵ[12ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10uϵ(1u)ϵ(1u2(1αβ))2ϵ(du)ϵ+2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)10t2ϵ(1(1αβ)t)2ϵ(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵ(1(1αβ)t)2ϵ(dt)ϵ]=β2ϵ[12ϵ2Fϵ1(2,2;4;12(1αβ))(Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+3ϵ))+2ϵ2Fϵ1(2,3;4;1αβ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+3ϵ)2Fϵ1(2,2;3;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)]=Kϵ2(α,β), (3.8)

    and

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵ(1t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)120(12t)ϵ(1t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)10(2t1)ϵ(1t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)120(12t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)102ϵtϵ(1t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵA2ϵt(dt)ϵ=β2ϵ[1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1u)ϵ(1u2(1αβ))2ϵ(du)ϵ+2ϵΓ(1+ϵ)10tϵ(1t)ϵ(1(1αβ)t)2ϵ(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵ(1(1αβ)t)2ϵ(dt)ϵ]=β2ϵ[2Fϵ1(2,1;3;12(1αβ))Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)+2ϵ2Fϵ1(2,2;4;1αβ)(Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)Γ(1+3ϵ))2Fϵ1(2,1;3;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ)]=Kϵ3(α,β). (3.9)

    From (3.4)–(3.9), we get inequality (3.2). This completes the proof.

    Theorem 3. Let I(0,) be an interval, ϕ:IRϵ is an increasing function on I such that ϕDϵ(I) and ϕ(ϵ)Cϵ[α,β] for α,βI with α<β. If |ϕ(ϵ)|q is generalized harmonically convex on [α,β], q>1,1p+1q=1, then for all x[α,β], the following local fractional integrals inequality holds.

    |ϕ(2αβα+β)Γ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ|ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ+αϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵβϵ[Γ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ)]1p(Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ))1q×[2Fϵ1(2q,2;3;1αβ)|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q+2Fϵ1(2q,1;3;1αβ)|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q]1q. (3.10)

    Proof. From inequality (3.4), we have

    |ϕ(2αβα+β)Γ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ|ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ+|I3|. (3.11)

    From Lemma 6, using the property of the modulus and the generalized Hölder's inequality, we have

    |I3|αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵ|1A2ϵtϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵαϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵp(dt)ϵ]1p[1Γ(1+ϵ)101A2ϵqt|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ]1q. (3.12)

    Since |ϕ(ϵ)|q is generalized harmonically convex on [α,β], we can get

    1Γ(1+ϵ)101A2ϵqt|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)101A2qϵt(tϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q+(1t)ϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q)(dt)ϵ=(1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵA2qϵt(dt)ϵ)|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q+(1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵA2qϵt(dt)ϵ)|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q. (3.13)

    By calculating, we have

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵA2qϵt(dt)ϵ=β2qϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵ(1(1αβ)t)2qϵ(dt)ϵ=β2qϵ2Fϵ1(2q,2;3;1αβ)Bϵ(2,1),=Γ(1+ϵ)β2qϵΓ(1+2ϵ)2Fϵ1(2q,2;3;1αβ), (3.14)
    1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵA2qϵt(dt)ϵ=β2qϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵ(1(1αβ)t)2qϵ(dt)ϵ=β2qϵ2Fϵ1(2q,1;3;1αβ)Bϵ(1,2),=Γ(1+ϵ)β2qϵΓ(1+2ϵ)2Fϵ1(2q,1;3;1αβ), (3.15)

    and

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵp(dt)ϵ=Γ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ). (3.16)

    Thus, combining (3.11)–(3.16), we obtain the required inequality. The proof is completed.

    Theorem 4. Let I(0,) be an interval, ϕ:IRϵ is an increasing function on I such that ϕDϵ(I) and ϕ(ϵ)Cϵ[α,β] for α,βI with α<β. If |ϕ(ϵ)|q is generalized harmonically convex on [α,β], q>1,1p+1q=1, then for all x[α,β], the following local fractional integrals inequality holds.

    |ϕ(2αβα+β)Γ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ|ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ+αϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵβϵ[2Fϵ1(2p,1;2;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ)]1p(Γ(1+qϵ)2ϵΓ(1+(q+1)ϵ))1q×[|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q+|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q]1q. (3.17)

    Proof. From Lemma 6, using the generalized Hölder's inequality and the generalized harmonically convexity of |ϕ(ϵ)|q, we have

    |I3|αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵ1A2ϵt|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵαϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[1Γ(1+ϵ)101A2ϵpt(dt)ϵ]1p[1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵq|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ]1qαϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[1Γ(1+ϵ)101A2ϵpt(dt)ϵ]1p×[1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵq(tϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q+(1t)ϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q)(dt)ϵ]1q. (3.18)

    By calculating, we have

    1Γ(1+ϵ)101A2pϵt(dt)ϵ=β2pϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1(1αβ)t)2pϵ(dt)ϵ=β2pϵ2Fϵ1(2p,1;2;1αβ)Bϵ(1,1),=2Fϵ1(2p,1;2;1αβ)β2pϵΓ(1+ϵ), (3.19)
    1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵqtϵ(dt)ϵ=1Γ(1+ϵ)1/20(12t)ϵqtϵ(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)11/2(2t1)ϵqtϵ(dt)ϵ=Γ(1+qϵ)2ϵΓ(1+(q+1)ϵ), (3.20)

    and

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵq(1t)ϵ(dt)ϵ=1Γ(1+ϵ)1/20(12t)ϵq(1t)ϵ(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)11/2(2t1)ϵq(1t)ϵ(dt)ϵ=Γ(1+qϵ)2ϵΓ(1+(q+1)ϵ). (3.21)

    From (3.11) in Theorem 3, combining (3.18)–(3.21), we obtain the required inequality. The proof is completed.

    Theorem 5. Let I(0,) be an interval, ϕ:IRϵ is an increasing function on I such that ϕDϵ(I) and ϕ(ϵ)Cϵ[α,β] for α,βI with α<β. If |ϕ(ϵ)|q is generalized harmonically convex on [α,β], q>1,1p+1q=1, then for all x[α,β], the following local fractional integrals inequality holds.

    |ϕ(2αβα+β)Γ(1+ϵ)αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ|ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ+αϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵβϵ[Γ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ)]1p[(2Fϵ1(2p,1;p+2;1αβ))1p+(2Fϵ1(2p,p+1;p+2;1αβ))1p](Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ))1q[|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q+|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q]1q. (3.22)

    Proof. Note that (αβ)ϵ=αϵβϵ. From Lemma 6, using the generalized Hölder's inequality and the generalized harmonically convexity of |ϕ(ϵ)|q, we have

    |I3|αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10|12t|ϵA2ϵt|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵ=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10|(1t)ϵtϵ|A2ϵt|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵαϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵA2ϵt|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵ+1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵA2ϵt|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|(dt)ϵ]αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[(1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ)1/p(1Γ(1+ϵ)10|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ)1/q+(1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ)1/p(1Γ(1+ϵ)10|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ)1/q]=αϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[(1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ)1/p+(1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ)1/p]×(1Γ(1+ϵ)10|ϕ(ϵ)(αβAt)|q(dt)ϵ)1/qαϵβϵ(βα)ϵ2ϵ[(1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ)1/p+(1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ)1/p]×(1Γ(1+ϵ)10[tϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(β)|q+(1t)ϵ|ϕ(ϵ)(α)|q](dt)ϵ)1/q. (3.23)

    By calculating, we have

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ=β2pϵ1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵp[1(1αβ)t]2pϵ(dt)ϵ=β2pϵ2Fϵ1(2p,1;p+2;1αβ)Bϵ(1,p+1)=β2pϵΓ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ)2Fϵ1(2p,1;p+2;1αβ). (3.24)

    Similarly,

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵpA2ϵpt(dt)ϵ=β2pϵ2Fϵ1(2p,p+1;p+2;1αβ)Bϵ(p+1,1)=β2pϵΓ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ)2Fϵ1(2p,p+1;p+2;1αβ). (3.25)

    And

    1Γ(1+ϵ)10tϵ(dt)ϵ=1Γ(1+ϵ)10(1t)ϵ(dt)ϵ=Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ). (3.26)

    From (3.11) in Theorem 3, combining (3.23)–(3.26), we obtain the required inequality. The proof is completed.

    We consider the following ϵ-type generalized special means of the real line numbers αϵ,βϵ with α<β on Yang's fractal sets.

    (1) The generalized arithmetic mean

    Aϵ(α,β)=αϵ+βϵ2ϵ;

    (2) The generalized p-logarithmic mean

    Lpϵ(α,β)=[Γ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ)β(p+1)ϵα(p+1)ϵ(βα)ϵ]1/p,pR{1,0};

    (3) The generalized geometric mean

    Gϵ(α,β)=(αϵβϵ)12;

    (4) The generalized harmonic mean

    Hϵ(α,β)=(2αβ)ϵαϵ+βϵ.

    Consider the function ϕ:(0,)Rϵ, ϕ(x)=Γ(1+kϵ)Γ(1+(k+1)ϵ)x(k+1)ϵ, x>0,k1 and q1. Because the function φ(x)=|ϕ(ϵ)(x)|q=xkqϵ is generalized convex and nondecreasing on (0,), by Proposition 3.3 in [22], the function φ(x) is generalized harmonically convex on (0,).

    Let ϕ(x)=Γ(1+kϵ)Γ(1+(k+1)ϵ)x(k+1)ϵ, x>0,k>1 and q>1. Then

    ϕ(2αβα+β)=Γ(1+kϵ)Γ(1+(k+1)ϵ)Hk+1ϵ(α,β),
    αϵβϵ(βα)ϵαI(ϵ)βϕ(x)x2ϵ=Γ(1+kϵ)Γ(1+(k+1)ϵ)Lk1(k1)ϵ(α,β)G2ϵ(α,β),
    ϕ(β)ϕ(α)2ϵ=(βα)ϵ2ϵLkkϵ(α,β).

    Proposition 1. From Theorem 2, we obtain the following inequality

    |Hk+1ϵ(α,β)Γ(1+ϵ)Lk1(k1)ϵ(α,β)G2ϵ(α,β)|(βα)ϵΓ(1+(k+1)ϵ)2ϵΓ(1+kϵ)[Lkkϵ(α,β)+αϵβϵ(Kϵ1(α,β))11q(Kϵ2(α,β)αkqϵ+Kϵ3(α,β)βkqϵ)1q],

    where Kϵ1(α,β),Kϵ2(α,β) and Kϵ3(α,β) as in Theorem 2.

    Proposition 2. From Theorem 3, we obtain the following inequality

    |Hk+1ϵ(α,β)Γ(1+ϵ)Lk1(k1)ϵ(α,β)G2ϵ(α,β)|(βα)ϵΓ(1+(k+1)ϵ)2ϵΓ(1+kϵ)[Lkkϵ(α,β)+αϵβϵ(Γ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ))1p(Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ))1q×(2Fϵ1(2q,2;3;1αβ)αkqϵ+2Fϵ1(2q,1;3;1αβ)βkqϵ)1q],

    where 1p+1q=1,q>1.

    Proposition 3. From Theorem 4, we obtain the following inequality

    |Hk+1ϵ(α,β)Γ(1+ϵ)Lk1(k1)ϵ(α,β)G2ϵ(α,β)|(βα)ϵΓ(1+(k+1)ϵ)2ϵΓ(1+kϵ)[Lkkϵ(α,β)+αϵβϵ(2Fϵ1(2p,1;2;1αβ)Γ(1+ϵ))1p(Γ(1+qϵ)2ϵΓ(1+(q+1)ϵ))1q×(αkqϵ+βkqϵ)1q],

    where 1p+1q=1,q>1.

    Proposition 4. From Theorem 5, we obtain the following inequality

    |Hk+1α(α,β)Γ(1+ϵ)Lk1(k1)ϵ(α,β)G2ϵ(α,β)|(βα)ϵΓ(1+(k+1)ϵ)2ϵΓ(1+kϵ){Lkkϵ(α,β)+αϵβϵ(Γ(1+pϵ)Γ(1+(p+1)ϵ))1p[(2Fϵ1(2p,1;p+2;1αβ))1p+(2Fϵ1(2p,p+1;p+2;1αβ))1p](Γ(1+ϵ)Γ(1+2ϵ))1q(αkqϵ+βkqϵ)1q},

    where 1p+1q=1,q>1.

    In this paper, the research on Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities is extended to Yang's fractal space. By using the definitions of generalized harmonically convex function and the theory of local fractional calculus, we construct some new Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for monotonically increasing functions with generalized harmonically convexity. Some applications related to the special mean are established by using the obtained inequalities, which shows that our results have certain application significance. Our research may inspire more scholars to further explore Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities on Yang's fractal sets.

    This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2020JJ4554) and Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Education Department (No. 18B433).

    This work does not have any conflicts of interest.



    [1] J. Hadamard, Étude sur les propriétés des fonctions entières et en particulier d'une fonction considérée par Riemann, J. Math. Pures Appl., 58 (1893), 171–215.
    [2] A. Guessab, G. Schmeisser, Sharp error estimates for interpolatory approximation on convex polytopes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 43 (2005), 909–923. doi: 10.1137/S0036142903435958
    [3] A. Guessab, G. Schmeisser, Convexity results and sharp error estimates in approximate multivariate integration, Math. Comput., 73 (2004), 1365–1384.
    [4] T. S. Du, M. U. Awan, A. Kashuri, S. S. Zhao, Some k-fractional extensions of the trapezium inequalities through generalized relative semi-(m,h)-preinvexity, Appl. Anal., 100 (2021), 642–662. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2019.1616083
    [5] M. A. Latif, M. Shoaib, Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for differentiable m-preinvex and (α,m)-preinvex functions, J. Egypt. Math. Soc., 23 (2015), 236–241. doi: 10.1016/j.joems.2014.06.006
    [6] J. G. Liao, S. H. Wu, T. S. Du, The Sugeno integral with respect to α-preinvex functions, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 379 (2020), 102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2018.11.008
    [7] M. E. Özdemir, Çetin Yıldız, A. O. Akdemir, E. Set, On some inequalities for s-convex functions and applications, J. Inequalities Appl., 2013 (2013), 333. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-333
    [8] S. Qaisar, C. J. He, S. Hussain, A generalizations of Simpsons type inequality for differentiable functions using (α,m)-convex functions and applications, J. Inequalities Appl., 2013 (2013), 158. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-158
    [9] W. B. Sun, Q. Liu, New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for (α,m)-convex functions and applications to special means, J. Math. Inequalities, 11 (2017), 383–397.
    [10] S. S. Dragomir, Inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for functions of selfadjoint operators and matrices, J. Math. Inequalities, 11 (2017), 241–259.
    [11] İ. İşcan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions, Hacettepe J. Math. Stat., 43 (2014), 935–942.
    [12] A. Guessab, G. Schmeisser, Sharp integral inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard type, J. Approximation Theory, 115 (2002), 260–288. doi: 10.1006/jath.2001.3658
    [13] M. Z. Sarikaya, E. Set, H. Yaldiz, N. Başak, Hermite-Hadamard's inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities, Math. Comput. Model., 57 (2013), 2403–2407. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.048
    [14] E. Set, İ. İşcan, F. Zehir, On some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type involving harmonically convex functions via fractional integrals, Konuralp J. Math., 3 (2015), 42–55.
    [15] J. R. Wang, C. Zhu, Y. Zhou, New generalized Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities and applications to special means, J. Inequalities Appl., 2013 (2013), 325. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-325
    [16] İ. İşcan, S. Wu, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions via fractional integrals, Appl. Math. Comput., 238 (2014), 237–244.
    [17] X. J. Yang, Advanced local fractional calculus and its applications, New York: World Science Publisher, 2012.
    [18] X. J. Yang, Local fractional functional analysis and its applications, Hong Kong: Asian Academic Publisher, 2011.
    [19] X. J. Yang, Local fractional integral equations and their applications, Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 1 (2012), 234–239.
    [20] H. X. Mo, X. Sui, D. Y. Yu, Generalized convex functions on fractal sets and two related inequalities, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 636751.
    [21] W. B. Sun, Some local fractional integral inequalities for generalized preinvex functions and applications to numerical quadrature, Fractals, 27 (2019), 1950071. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X19500713
    [22] W. B. Sun, Generalized harmonically convex functions on fractal sets and related Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 11 (2017), 5869–5880.
    [23] S. Erdena, M. Z. Sarikaya, Generalized Pompeiu type inequalities for local fractional integrals and its applications, Appl. Math. Comput., 274 (2016), 282–291.
    [24] J. G. Liu, X. J. Yang, Y. Y. Feng, P. Cui, A new perspective to study the third order modified KdV equation on fractal set, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2050110, doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20501108
    [25] X. J. Yang, F. Gao, H. M. Srivastava, Non-differentiable exact solutions for the nonlinear odes defined on fractal sets, Fractals, 25 (2017), 1740002. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X17400023
    [26] X. J. Yang, J. A. Tenreiro, D. Baleanu, Exact traveling-wave solution for local fractional Boussinesq equation in fractal domain, Fractals, 25 (2017), 1740006. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X17400060
    [27] M. Z. Sarikaya, H. Budak, Generalized Ostrowski type inequalities for local fractional integrals, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 145 (2017), 1527–1538.
    [28] K. J. Wang, Variational principle and approximate solution for the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation with fractal derivative, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2150044. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21500444
    [29] K. L. Wang, S. W. Yao, Y. P. Liu, L. N. Zhang, A fractal variational principle for the telegraph equation with fractal derivatives, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2050058. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20500589
    [30] G. Chen, H. M. Srivastava, P. Wang, W. Wei, Some further generalizations of Hölder's inequality and related results on fractal space, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 832802.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Muhammad Bilal Khan, Hatim Ghazi Zaini, Jorge E. Macías-Díaz, Savin Treanțǎ, Mohamed S. Soliman, Some Fuzzy Riemann–Liouville Fractional Integral Inequalities for Preinvex Fuzzy Interval-Valued Functions, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 313, 10.3390/sym14020313
    2. KANGLE WANG, NOVEL SCHEME FOR THE FRACTAL–FRACTIONAL SHORT WATER WAVE MODEL WITH UNSMOOTH BOUNDARIES, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22501936
    3. KANGLE WANG, NOVEL TRAVELING WAVE SOLUTIONS FOR THE FRACTAL ZAKHAROV–KUZNETSOV–BENJAMIN–BONA–MAHONY MODEL, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22501705
    4. JUAN LIU, A NOVEL COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH FOR FRACTAL NONLINEAR POCHHAMMER–CHREE MODEL, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22501596
    5. Muhammad Tariq, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Fahd Jarad, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Some integral inequalities for generalized preinvex functions with applications, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 13907, 10.3934/math.2021805
    6. KANGLE WANG, NEW FRACTAL SOLITON SOLUTIONS FOR THE COUPLED FRACTIONAL KLEIN–GORDON EQUATION WITH β-FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE, 2023, 31, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X23500032
    7. Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Uzair Awan, Usama Asif, Muhammad Zakria Javed, Hüseyin Budak, Advances in Ostrowski-Mercer Like Inequalities within Fractal Space, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 689, 10.3390/fractalfract7090689
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2499) PDF downloads(104) Cited by(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog