
Citation: Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Muhammad Imran, Aisha Javed, Roslan Hasni. On the first general Zagreb eccentricity index[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 532-542. doi: 10.3934/math.2021032
[1] | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Azeem Haider, Moin A. Ansari . Computation of eccentric topological indices of zero-divisor graphs based on their edges. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11509-11518. doi: 10.3934/math.2022641 |
[2] | Hongzhuan Wang, Xianhao Shi, Ber-Lin Yu . On the eccentric connectivity coindex in graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 651-666. doi: 10.3934/math.2022041 |
[3] | Zhibin Du, Ayu Ameliatul Shahilah Ahmad Jamri, Roslan Hasni, Doost Ali Mojdeh . Maximal first Zagreb index of trees with given Roman domination number. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11801-11812. doi: 10.3934/math.2022658 |
[4] | Chenxu Yang, Meng Ji, Kinkar Chandra Das, Yaping Mao . Extreme graphs on the Sombor indices. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19126-19146. doi: 10.3934/math.20221050 |
[5] | Natarajan Chidambaram, Swathi Mohandoss, Xinjie Yu, Xiujun Zhang . On leap Zagreb indices of bridge and chain graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6521-6536. doi: 10.3934/math.2020420 |
[6] | Juan C. Hernández, José M. Rodríguez, O. Rosario, José M. Sigarreta . Extremal problems on the general Sombor index of a graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8330-8343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022464 |
[7] | Jianping Li, Leshi Qiu, Jianbin Zhang . Proof of a conjecture on the $ \epsilon $-spectral radius of trees. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4363-4371. doi: 10.3934/math.2023217 |
[8] | Edil D. Molina, José M. Rodríguez-García, José M. Sigarreta, Sergio J. Torralbas Fitz . On the Gutman-Milovanović index and chemical applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 1998-2020. doi: 10.3934/math.2025094 |
[9] | Zhen Lin . The biharmonic index of connected graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6050-6065. doi: 10.3934/math.2022337 |
[10] | Ali Al Khabyah . Mathematical aspects and topological properties of two chemical networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4666-4681. doi: 10.3934/math.2023230 |
All the graphs considered in the paper are simple, finite and undirected. A graph G consists of two sets named as the set of vertices V(G) and the set of edges E(G). The number of elements in the vertex set is called the order and the number of edges in the edge set is called the size of the graph G. For a vertex u∈V(G), NG(u) is the set of adjacent vertices with u and is called the set of neighbors of u. The number of element in NG(u) is called the degree of the vertex u in G and is denoted by dG(u). For any graph with n vertices, the vertex with degree n−1 is known as dominating vertex and the vertex with degree one is known as pendant vertex. The distance between the vertices u and w, dG(u,w), is the length of the shortest path connecting them. A path whose length is equal to diameter is called diametrical path of G. For a vertex u∈V(G), the maximum distance between the vertex u and any other vertex of the graph G is called the eccentricity of u in G and is denoted by ecG(u). A graph G is said to be a bipartite graph of order n if its vertex set can be partitioned into two disjoint vertex subsets, say A and B, such that each edge of G has one end in A and other end in B. If |A|=a and |B|=b, then Ka,b represents the complete bipartite graph in which every vertex of A is adjacent with vertex of B by an edge. Pn and Cn denote the path and cycle graph on n vertices. For other graph theoretical notations we refer [1].
Let G and H be two vertex disjoint graph, then the graph G+H is obtained by joining each vertex of G to each vertex of H by an edge.
A topological index is a numerical quantity associated with a graph. Topological indices have many applications in chemistry, biology, pharmaceutics and other related fields. There are hundreds of degree, eccentricity and distance based topological indices have been introduced.
In 1972, Gutman et al. [2] introduced the first Zagreb index of a graph G as
M1(G)=∑u∈V(G)d(u)2 |
In 2005, Li and Zheng [3] generalized the definition of the first Zagreb index and proposed the first general Zagreb index by replacing the square by any non-zero real number γ,
Mγ1(G)=∑u∈V(G)d(u)γ. |
In [4], the authors discussed the behavioral change in the first general Zagreb index for some graph operations, these operations involve edge moving, edge separating and edge switching in a graph. Liu et al. [5] studied the Cartesian product of two graphs, where one graph is D-sum and other graph is any connected graph. Bedratyuk and Savenko [6] expressed the general first Zagreb index in terms of the star sequence and the formulas of first general Zagreb index of certain cactus chains are discussed in [7].
In 2010, Todeschini and co-authors [8] proposed the multiplicative version of the first Zagreb index as
∏1(G)=∏u∈V(G)d(u)2. |
Recently, Vetrík et al. [9] introduced the first general multiplicative Zagreb index of a graph which is defined as
γ∏1(G)=∏u∈V(G)d(u)γ. |
In [9], the authors proposed the extremal trees for the general multiplicative Zagreb index in terms of order, number of pendant vertices, segments and branching vertices. The same author investigated the extremal graphs with given clique number for the general multiplicative Zagreb index [10]. Recently in [11], authors found upper and lower bounds for the general multiplicative Zagreb index on the class of bicyclic, tricyclic and tetracyclic graphs.
Vukiˇcević and Graovac replace the degree of the vertex with the eccentricity of the vertex and proposed the eccentricity based first Zagreb index as
E1(G)=∑u∈V(G)ec(u)2 |
The notation of the total eccentricity index is defined as the ξ(G)=∑u∈V(G)ec(u).
In this paper, we introduce the generalized version of the first eccentricity Zagreb index. For any non-zero real number γ, the first general eccentricity Zagreb index of a graph G is defined as
Eγ1(G)=∑u∈V(G)ec(u)γ. |
We investigate the extremal trees and bipartite graphs with respect to the first general Zagreb eccentricity index. Moreover, some bounds on the first general Zagreb eccentricity index are present in terms of order, size and the diameter of a graph. The presented results are for γ>0, for γ<0 results can be obtained on similar lines.
In this section, we present some lemmas and our main results. Let Pn and Sn be the path and star with n vertices. Assume T1 be the tree with maximum degree n−2. From the definition of the first general Zagreb eccentricity index, we have the following formulas for Pn, Sn and T1.
Eγ1(Pn)={2[∑n−12i=1(n−i)γ]+(n−12)γ;nodd2[∑n2i=1(n−i)γ];nevenEγ1(Sn)=(n−1)2γ+1Eγ1(T1)=(n−2)3γ+2γ+1 |
Let H be a tree as shown in Figure 1. The vertex u has unique neighbor in A and C and t≥1 neighbors in B. Now we obtain a new graph H′ from the graph H by switching these t neighbors from u to v.
Lemma 2.1. Let H and H′ be the above defined graphs. Then for γ>0
1. Let P be a diametrical path of H such that E(P)⊆E(C). Then Eγ1(H)>Eγ1(H′),
2. If diametrical path P contains the vertex u and some vertices from A and C and ecH(u)≥ecH(v), then
Eγ1(H)≥Eγ1(H′). |
Proof. Let y be a pendant vertex of diametrical path P and x∈V(H) then ecH(x)=dH(x,y). One can notice that for x∈V(H)−V(B) we have ecH(x)=ecH′(x), otherwise ecH(x)−ecH′(x)=ecH(u)−ecH′(v)=ecH(u)−ecH(v). Moreover, for (i) and (ii) we have ecH(u)>ecH(v) and ecH(u)≥ecH(v), respectively. Hence, Eγ1(H)>Eγ1(H′) and Eγ1(H)≥Eγ1(H′) for γ>0.
Let τ(n,k) contains all the trees of order n with k pendant vertices, where 2≤k≤n−1.
Lemma 2.2. Let G∈τ(n,k), where 2≤k≤n−1 such that G has minimum first general Zagreb eccentricity index for γ>0. Let P=v1v2⋯vdvd+1 be a diametrical path in G. Then the vertices with degree at least three in G can only be the central vertices of P.
Proof. For k = 2 and k = n−1, τ(n,k) contains only path and star graphs, respectively, hence the result is obvious. In the following we consider 3≤k≤n−2.
Since G has the minimum first general Zagreb eccentricity index for γ>0, so from Lemma 2.1 we have information that no vertex of G with degree at least three is outside P. Now we show that vertices with degree at least three on P can only be the central vertices of P. Let vi, 2≤i≤d and d≥2, be a vertex of P with degree at least three. Let ecG(vi)>ecG(vi+1), then by applying Lemma 2.1 (ii) we can obtain a new tree in τ(n,k) with the smaller first general Zagreb eccentricity index for γ>0, which is a contradiction. So, ecG(vi)≤ecG(vi+1). On similar lines we can get ecG(vi)≤ecG(vi−1). We have ecG(vi)=d+1−i or i. For ecG(vi)≤ecG(vi+1), i≤d+1−i≤i+1 and this implies that 2i=d or d+1. For ecG(vi)≤ecG(vi−1), i≥d+1−i or i≤d−i+2 and this implies that 2i=d,d+1 or d+2. Hence, vi is a central vertex of P.
Lemma 2.3. Let G be a tree in τ(n,k) with 3≤k≤n−2. If G has unique vertex of degree at least three then for γ>0, we have
Eγ1(G)≥Eγ1(Tn,k) |
and the equality holds for G≅Tn,k.
Proof. Let G∈τ(n,k) has the minimum first general Zagreb eccentricity index for γ>0 with unique vertex of degree at least three. This implies that there is a vertex u∈V(G) having k pendant paths. In these k pendant paths, suppose that Pa,Pb and Pc be the maximum, second maximum and minimum length paths, i.e. a≥b≥c. Suppose that uu1∈E(G). For a>b+1, we have ecG(u)>ecG(u1) and by applying Lemma 2.1 we can construct a new tree satisfying the given condition with the smaller first general Zagreb eccentricity index for γ>0, which is a contradiction. So we have either a=b or b+1. Now let a>c+1. Suppose that u′ and u″ be the pendant vertices of P1 and P3 and u′w∈E(P1). We attained a new graph G∗=G−u′w+u′u″. Clearly, G∗ has unique vertex of degree at least three. Hence, we obtain ecG∗(v)≤ecG∗(v) for all vertices of G, which again leads to a contradiction. Thus either a=c or a=c+1, in other words we have G≅Tn,k.
In the following result, we characterize the extremal trees with the maximum and minimum first general Zagreb eccentricity index.
Theorem 2.1. Let T be a tree of order n, then for γ>0
Eγ1(T)≤Eγ1(Pn) | (2.1) |
and for γ≥1
Eγ1(Sn)≤Eγ1(T) | (2.2) |
the equalities in (1) and (2) hold for path and star graphs, respectively, of order n.
Proof. If T is a path of order n, then we have nothing to prove. Let T≆Pn be a tree with the diameter d and Pd+1=u1u2⋯udud+1 be the longest path in T. This implies that ecT(u)=max{dT(u,u1),dT(u,ud+1)}≤d, for each u∈V(T). Since T is a tree so u1 and ud+1 must be pendant vertices. Moreover, T≆Pn so there is at least one more pendant vertex, say v, and vw∈E(G). Now we obtain a new tree T′ from T as T′=T−vw+vud+1. Clearly, T′ has diameter d+1 with the longest path u1u2⋯udud+1v. This implies that for u≠v we have ecT′(u)=max{dT′(u,u1),dT′(u,v)}=max{dT(u,u1),dT(u,ud+1)+1}≥max{dT(u,u1),dT(u,ud+1)}=ecT(u) and for ecT′(v)=d+1>d≥ecT(v). From the definition of the first general Zagreb eccentricity index and the construction of T′ we have Eγ1(T)<Eγ1(T′), i.e. this construction increases the Eγ1 for γ>0. Now, if T≅Pn then we are done, otherwise there exist at least one pendant vertex, say v′≠u1,ud+1, and we will repeat the construction. After finite number of repetition, we obtain a tree with maximum degree two and every repetition increases Eγ1, hence Pn gives the maximum Eγ1 for γ>0.
Now we will work for the lower bound. If T is Sn, then we have nothing to prove and for T≅T1 the inequality is strict. Now we suppose that T≆Sn and T≆T1. Let d be the diameter of T and Pd+1=u1u2⋯udud+1 be a longest path in T. Suppose that d(u2)≥d(ud). Choose v an arbitrary maximum degree vertex, unless ud has maximum degree, in which case v is chosen to be u2. We obtain a new tree T″ such that T″=T−udud+1+ud+1v. This implies that ecT′(u)=max{dT′(u,u1),dT′(u,ud)}=max{dT(u,u1),dT(u,ud+1)−1}≤max{dT(u,u1),dT(u,ud+1)}=ecT(u). From this we obtain that Eγ1(T)≥Eγ1(T′), i.e., this construction provides a non-decreased value of Eγ1 for γ≥1. If T″≅T1, the proof is complete. Otherwise, we will continue the construction as follows; we choose a pendant vertex from a longest path whose neighbor does not have the maximum degree. Now we obtain a new graph by deleting that pendant edge and joining this to the maximum degree vertex. After finite number of repetition we obtain a graph with maximum degree n−2, i.e. T1 graph. Hence the required result.
From the above result, we have the following corollaries for the first Zagreb eccentricity and the total eccentricity indices.
Corollary 2.1. For a tree of order n, the total eccentricity and the first Zagreb indices are given as
2n−1≤ξ(T)≤{3n2−2n−14;nodd3n2−2n4;neven4n−3≤E1(T)≤{7n3−9n2−n+34;nodd7n3−9n2+2n4;neven |
in above both left equalities hold for the star of order n while the right equalities hold for the path of order n.
Let Kn−2r−2,2 be the complete bipartite graph of order n−2r, then we obtain a graph G1 from Kn−2r−2,2 by joining the vertices of degree n−2r−2 of Kn−2r−2,2 by an edge and attaching two paths Pq+1 with each of them, i.e. G1=Kn−2r−2,2+uv+uwr+1wr⋯w1+vwr+2wr+3⋯w2r+2 where u and v are the vertices of degree n−2r−2 in Kn−2r−2,2.
Let G2 be a graph of order n obtained from Kn−2r−1,2 by joining a new vertex w to the two vertices of Kn−2r−1,2 of degree n−2r−1 and attaching two paths Pr with each of them, i.e. G2=Kn−2r−1,2+uw+vw+uwrwr−1⋯w2w1+vwr+1wr+2⋯w2r. The above discussed graphs G1 and G2 are shown in Figure 2.
Now let, τi, i=1,2, be the collection of all graphs Hi=(V,E) with diameter d=2r+i such that V(Gi)=V(Hi) and E(Gi)⊆E(Hi).
The following result provides the lower bound on the first general Zagreb eccentricity index involving the number of vertices and the diameter of a graph.
Theorem 2.2. For a graph G with vertices n and diameter d, we have
Eγ1(G)≥{2[∑d2i=1(d−i+1)γ]+(n−d)(d2)γ;deven2[∑d+12i=1(d−i+1)γ+(n−d−1)(⌈d2⌉)γ];dodd | (2.3) |
and the equality holds if and only if G≅Pn or G∈τi for i=1,2.
Proof. Let Pd+1=w1w2⋯wd+1 be the longest path in G. Also, n≥d+1 and ec(u)≥⌈d2⌉ for every u∈V(G). Clearly, for n=d+1 we have G≅Pn and the equality holds. Now let n>d+1 and we have
d+1∑j=1ec(wi)γ={2[∑d2i=1(d−i+1)γ]+(d2);deven2[∑d+12i=1(d−i+1)γ];dodd |
From the definition of Eγ1 we have
Eγ1(G)=d+1∑j=1ec(wi)γ+n∑j=d+2ec(wi)γ |
≥{2[∑d2i=1(d−i+1)γ]+(n−d)(d2)γ;deven2[∑d+12i=1(d−i+1)γ+(n−d−1)(⌈d2⌉)γ];dodd. | (2.4) |
Now conversely suppose that equality hold in the result for n>d+1, then from Eq. 2.4 we get ec(u)=⌈d2⌉ for each u∈V(G). This implies that all the vertices wj, d+2≤j≤n, are adjacent with wr and wr+2 for d=2r and for d=2r+1 vertices wj, d+2≤j≤n, are adjacent with wr+1 and wr+2 and hence G∈τi, i = 1, 2.
Now, we have the following direct result.
Corollary 2.2. Let G be a graph of order n and diameter d. Then for the total eccentcity and first eccentricity Zagreb indices we have
ζ(G)≥{d(2+d+2n)4;neven3d2+4d+14+(n−d−1)⌈d2⌉;noddE1(G)≥{d(3d(3+n)+4d2+2)12;nevend(7d2+12d+5)12+(n−d−1)(⌈d2⌉)2;nodd |
both equalities hold if and only if G≅Pn or G∈τi for i=1,2.
The following theorem characterizes the extremal bipartite graphs with respect to the first general Zagreb eccentricity index.
Theorem 2.3. Let G be a bipartite graph of order n. For γ>0, we have
Eγ1(Ka,b)≤Eγ1(G)≤Eγ1(Pn) |
and the left and right equalities hold for Ka,b and Pn, respectively, where a+b=n.
Proof. If G≅Ka,b, we have nothing to prove. Suppose that G≆Ka,b. Clearly, G can be obtained from Ka,b by removing some edges. From the definition of the first general Zagreb eccentricity index we have Eγ1(G)≥Eγ1(Ka,b−e)>Eγ1(Ka,b) for γ>0.
For upper bound, if T is a spanning tree of a bipartite graph G, then Eγ1(G)≤Eγ1(T)≤Eγ1(Pn), the last inequality is due to the Theorem 2.1.
The next results can be obtained easily from the above result.
Corollary 2.3. For a bipartite graph G of order n, the total eccentricity and the first Zagreb indices is given as
2n≤ξ(G)≤{3n2−2n−14;nodd3n2−2n4;neven4n≤E1(G)≤{7n3−9n2−n+34;nodd7n3−9n2+2n4;neven |
both the equalities on the left and right hand sides hold for Ka,b and Pn, respectively, where a+b=n.
Let n,m and q be positive integers such that n−1≤m≤(n2) and t=⌊2n−1−√(2n−1)2−8m2⌋. Let X be a graph of order n−t and size m−(n2)−t(n−t), and G(n,m) be the set of Kt+X graphs. We can notice that t, 1≤t<n is the greatest integer fulfilling 2m≥t(n−1)+t(n−t) or f(t)=t2−2nt+t+2m, we have [m−(n2)−t(n−t)]−(n−t−1)=12f(t+1)<0. This gives that each vertex of X has eccentricity two in Kt+X.
Theorem 2.4. Let G be a graph of order n and size m and (n−1)≤m<(n2), then for γ>0
Eγ1(G)≥(n−t)⋅2γ+t |
and the equality holds if and only if G∈G(n,m).
Proof. Let c, 0≤c≤n−2, be the number of dominating vertices in G. Clearly, for c=0 we have Eγ1(G)≥n⋅2γ>n⋅2γ−3t. Now suppose that c≥1, this implies that n−c non-dominating vertices have eccentricity two in G, thus Eγ1(G)=(n−c)⋅2γ+c. Since t is the largest integer fulfilling the inequality 2m≥t(n−1)+t(n−t) which implies that c≤t. Moreover, (n−c)⋅2γ+c is a decreasing function with respect to c for γ>0. Thus we have the result Eγ1(G)=(n−c)⋅2γ+c≥(n−t)⋅2γ+t and the equality holds if and only if G contain exactly t dominating vertices and n−t vertices with eccentricity two, i.e. G is a graph from G(n,m).
Corollary 2.4. Let G be a graph of order n and size m and (n−1)≤m<(n2), then we have
ξ(G)≥n−tE1(G)≥4n−3t |
and the equalities hold if and only if G∈G(n,m).
For positive integers n and k with 3≤k≤n−2, suppose s=⌊n−1k⌋ and t=n−1−ks. Let Tn,k be a tree obtained by attaching k−t paths of s vertices and t paths of s+1 vertices to a common vertex. If n−2 ≡0(modk). then Tn,k(q) be a tree obtained by attaching q and k−q path of n−2k vertices, respectively, to the two end vertices of an edge, where 1≤q≤⌊k2⌋. These graphs are shown in Figure 3.
Theorem 2.5. For n≥4 and 3≤k≤n−2, let G∈τ(n,k), s=⌊n−1k⌋ and t=n−1−ks. For γ≥1, we have
Eγ1(G)≥{ks−1∑i=0(2s−i)γ+sγ;t=0ks−1∑i=0(2s+1−i)γ+2(s+1)γ;t=1ks−2∑i=0(2s+1−i)γ+(2γt+1)(s+1)γ;t≥2 |
and the equality in above holds if and only if G≅Tn,k or G≅Tn,k with 2≤q≤⌊k2⌋ when n−2≡0(modk).
Proof. Let G be a graph in τ(n,k) having the minimum first general Zagreb eccentricity index. Denoting V3(G) the set of vertices in G of degree at least three. Lemma 2.2 implies that either |V3(G)|=1 or |V3(G)|=2. If |V3(G)|=1, then result follows from Lemma 2.3. Now consider that |V3(G)|=2 and V3(G)={u1,u2}. Let P be a diametrical path in G, then from Lemma 2.2 u1u2∈E(P) and ecG(u1)=ec(u2). Let a and b be the maximum and minimum length of pendant paths at u1 and a>b. Let H be the graph obtained from G by shifting all the neighbors of u1 in G outside P to u2, then by Lemma 2.1 (ii) we have Eγ1(G)=Eγ1(H). Note that |V3(H)|=1 and in H there are two pendant paths of lengths a+1 and b on u2. As a−b+1>1, we have Eγ1(G)=Eγ1(H)>Eγ1(Tn,k), which is a contradiction. Hences, all pendant paths on u1 have the same length in G. Similarly, we can show that each pendant paths at v have the same length. This implies that G≅Tn,k(q) with 2≤q≤⌊k2⌋.
Corollary 2.5. For n≥4 and 3≤k≤n−2, let G∈τ(n,k), s=⌊n−1k⌋ and t=n−1−ks. Then the total eccentricity index of G is
ζ(G)≥{s(3ks+k+2)2;t=0(1+s)(4+3ks)2;t=1(1+s)(2+3ks+4t)2;t≥2 |
equality in above holds if and only if G≅Tn,k or G≅Tn,k with 2≤q≤⌊k2⌋ when n−2≡0(modk).
Corollary 2.6. For n≥4 and 3≤k≤n−2, let G∈τ(n,k), s=⌊n−1k⌋ and t=n−1−ks, then the first Zagreb eccentricity index
E1(G)≥{s(14ks2+9ks+6s+k)6;t=0(1+s)(14ks2+s(13k+3)+3)3;t=1ks(1+s)(14s+13)+(s+1)2(4t+1)6;t≥2 |
equality holds if and only if G≅Tn,k or G≅Tn,k with 2≤q≤⌊k2⌋ when n−2≡0(modk).
Let Tn,q,p be a tree of order n attained by attaching p and q−p pendant vertices to the two pendant vertices of Pn−q, where 1≥p≥⌊q2⌋. Let τn,q be the set of all Tn,p,q trees.
Theorem 2.6. Let G∈τ(n,k), where 2≤k≤n−1, then for γ≥1 we have
Eγ1(G)≤{2[∑n−k2i=1(n−k−i)γ]+(n−k2)γ;n−keven2[∑n−k+12i=1(n−k−i+1)γ];n−kodd |
the equality holds if and only if G∈τn,q.
Proof. If d is the diameter of G, then diametrical path P of G contain d−1 non-pendant vertices thus k≤n−(d−1), i.e. d≤n−k+1. From Theorem 2.2, we have Eγ1(G)≤ϕ(n,d)≤ϕ(n,n−k+1). Clearly, Eγ1(G)=ϕ(n,n−k+1) if and only if G∈τn,k.
Corollary 2.7. Let G∈τ(n,k), where 2≤k≤n−1, then for γ≥1 we have
ζ(G)≥{3(k−n)24;n−keven(3n2−6kn+4n+3k2−4k+1)4;n−kodd |
the equality holds if and only if G∈τn,q.
Corollary 2.8. Let G∈τ(n,k), where 2≤k≤n−1, then for γ≥1 we have
E1(G)≥{(n(7n2−6n+2)−k(21n2−12n+2)+3k2(7n−2)−7k3)12;n−keven(n(7n2+12n+5)+3k2(7n+4)−k(21n2+24n+5)−7k3)4;n−kodd |
the equality holds if and only if G∈τn,q.
The generalized version of the first Zagreb eccentricity index is proposed in this paper. The classes of trees and bipartite graphs are chosen to find the extremal graphs for the first general Zagreb eccentricity index. Some bounds of the index is also proposed in terms of the number of vertices, number of edges and diameter. In each case extremal graphs are determined.
This research is supported by the UPAR Grants of United Arab Emirates University via Grant No. G00002590 and G00003271.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | J. R. Bondy, U. S. R. Murty, Graph theory, Springer, 2008. |
[2] | I. Gutman, N. Trinajstić, Graph theory and molecular orbitals. Total π- electron energy of alternant hydrocarbons, Chem. Phys. Lett., 17 (1972), 535-538. |
[3] | X. Li, J. Zheng, A unified approach to the extremal trees for different indices, Math. Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 54 (2005), 195-208. |
[4] | M. Liu, B. Liu, Some properties of the first general Zagreb index, Australasian J. Comb., 47 (2010), 285-294. |
[5] | J. B. Liu, S. Javed, M. Javaid, K. Shabbir, Computing first general Zagreb index of operations on graphs, IEEE access, 2019 DOI10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909822. |
[6] | L. Bedratyuk, O. Savenko, The star sequence and the general first Zagreb index, Math Comunn. Math. Comput. Chem., 79 (2018), 407-414. |
[7] |
N. De, General Zagreb index of some cactus chains, Open J. Discret. Appl. Math., 2 (2019), 24-31. doi: 10.30538/psrp-odam2019.0008
![]() |
[8] | R. Todeschini, D. Ballabio, V. Consonni, Novel molecular descriptors based on functions of new vertex degrees. In: Novel Molecular Structure Descriptors Theory and Applications I; Gutman, I., Furtula, B., Eds.; University Kragujevac: Kragujevac, Serbia, (2010), 72—100. |
[9] |
T. Vetrík, S. Balachandran, General multiplicative Zagreb indices of trees, Disc. App. Math., 247 (2018), 341-351. doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2018.03.084
![]() |
[10] |
T. Vetrík, S. Balachandran, General multiplicative Zagreb indices of graphs with given clique number, Opuscula Math., 39 (2019), 433-446. doi: 10.7494/OpMath.2019.39.3.433
![]() |
[11] | M. R. Alfuraidan, T. Vetrík, S. Balachandran, General multiplicative Zagreb indices of graphs with a small number of cycles, Symmetry, 12 (2020), Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040514. |
1. | Haidar Ali, Ayesha Umer, Parvez Ali, Mohamed Sesay, Ghous Ali, Eccentricity-Based Topological Invariants of First Type of Dominating David-Derived Networks, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/7562648 | |
2. | Fei Yu, Hifza Iqbal, Saira Munir, Jia Bao Liu, M-polynomial and topological indices of some transformed networks, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 13887, 10.3934/math.2021804 | |
3. | Fazal Hayat, Shou-Jun Xu, Xuli Qi, Minimizing the second Zagreb eccentricity index in bipartite graphs with a fixed size and diameter, 2024, 70, 1598-5865, 5049, 10.1007/s12190-024-02163-8 |