This Special Issue of AIMS Materials Science was devoted to the topic "Materials for Additive Manufacturing". It attracted significant attention from scholars and practitioners from ten different countries (Spain, Greece, France, Portugal, Italy, Finland, Ethiopia, Canada, Vietnam, and Iraq) and published five manuscripts of a total of ten submissions between April 2021 and March 2022. In addition, new materials, methodologies, and analysis approaches are presented in materials for additive manufacturing.
Citation: John D. Kechagias. Materials for Additive Manufacturing[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(6): 785-790. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022048
[1] | Mnvrl Kumar, R. Ramakrishnan, Alnura Omarbekova, Santhosh Kumar. R . Experimental characterization of mechanical properties and microstructure study of polycarbonate (PC) reinforced acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) composite with varying PC loadings. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(1): 18-28. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021002 |
[2] | Mahdi Rafiee, Roozbeh Abidnejad, Anton Ranta, Krishna Ojha, Alp Karakoç, Jouni Paltakari . Exploring the possibilities of FDM filaments comprising natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites for additive manufacturing. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(4): 524-537. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021032 |
[3] | M. A. Mendizabal, Maitane Garcia, Luis Palenzuela, Enrique Hernández . Obtaining preforms by additive fused deposition modelling (FDM) extrusion technology for the manufacture of high-performance composites. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(3): 481-497. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022028 |
[4] | Stelladriana Volpe, Andrea Petrella, Valentino Sangiorgio, Michele Notarnicola, Francesco Fiorito . Preparation and characterization of novel environmentally sustainable mortars based on magnesium potassium phosphate cement for additive manufacturing. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(4): 640-658. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021039 |
[5] | Mohammad S. Alsoufi, Mohammed W. Alhazmi, Dhia K. Suker, Mohammed Yunus, Rashad O. Malibari . From 3D models to FDM 3D prints: experimental study of chemical treatment to reduce stairs-stepping of semi-sphere profile. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 1086-1106. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1086 |
[6] | Yong X. Gan . A review of electrohydrodynamic casting energy conversion polymer composites. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(2): 206-225. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.2.206 |
[7] | Alejandro Sandá, Rocío Ruiz, Miguel Ángel Mafé, Jon Ander Sarasua, Antonio González-Jiménez . Scrapping of PEKK-based thermoplastic composites retaining long fibers and their use for compression molded recycled parts. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 819-834. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023044 |
[8] | Thomas J. Lee, Andrew H. Morgenstern, Thomas A. Höft, Brittany B. Nelson-Cheeseman . Dispersion of particulate in solvent cast magnetic thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer composites. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(3): 354-362. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.3.354 |
[9] | Andrew H. Morgenstern, Thomas M. Calascione, Nathan A. Fischer, Thomas J. Lee, John E. Wentz, Brittany B. Nelson-Cheeseman . Thermoplastic magnetic elastomer for fused filament fabrication. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(3): 363-376. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.3.363 |
[10] | Bandar Abdullah Aloyaydi, Subbarayan Sivasankaran, Hany Rizk Ammar . Influence of infill density on microstructure and flexural behavior of 3D printed PLA thermoplastic parts processed by fusion deposition modeling. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 1033-1048. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1033 |
This Special Issue of AIMS Materials Science was devoted to the topic "Materials for Additive Manufacturing". It attracted significant attention from scholars and practitioners from ten different countries (Spain, Greece, France, Portugal, Italy, Finland, Ethiopia, Canada, Vietnam, and Iraq) and published five manuscripts of a total of ten submissions between April 2021 and March 2022. In addition, new materials, methodologies, and analysis approaches are presented in materials for additive manufacturing.
Additive manufacturing 3D printing processes have become a topic of increased interest in recent years from both manufacturing and systems points of view, with increasing significance within the tailored made functional products [1]. 3D printing uses metals [2], ceramics [3], plastics [4], wooden [5] or composites [6] materials to build physical objects or constructions as prototypes or final parts/buildings [7]. 3D printing processes include—but are not limited to—material extrusion [8], powder bed fusion [9], binder jetting [10], directed energy deposition [11], material jetting [12], and sheet lamination [13]. Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) [14], stereo-lithography (SLA) [15], selective laser melting (SLM) [16,17], Electron Beam Melting (EBM) [18], selective laser sintering (SLS) [19], and laminated object manufacturing (LOM) [20] are the most extensively technologies applied.
Additive manufacturing, thanks to layer-by-layer assembly, has already proved its suitability for structural as well as functional and smart applications [2,21,22]. Automotive [23], aerospace [24], biomedical engineering [25,26], education [27], food and agricultural [28,29], and fashion [30] are some of the areas that applied with success [31]. Materials and products based on additive manufacturing are being explored intensively, having excellent physical and mechanical properties [32].
This open Special Issue has accepted five quality peer-reviewed manuscripts, of which four are correlated to the material extrusion-based 3D printing process and one with the laser beam melting process.
Rafiee et al. [33] investigated the mechanical, thermal, and microstructural properties of birch fiber-reinforced PLA composite granules, biobased with natural fiber thermoplastic polymers manufactured in-house for the fused filament fabrication process. Even if they achieved proper 3D printing of biocomposite filaments, they also pointed out that if the 3d printing parameters, including nozzle and bed temperatures and material flow rate, are optimised for generic and flawless filament extrusion, then minimal labour and end-products with better strength and resolutions can be achieved.
Volpe et al. [34] analysed magnesium potassium phosphate cement (MKPC) performance as an innovative cementitious material in terms of sustainability and the possibility of its use in extrusion-based 3D concrete printing. They discussed the relationship between the water to binder ratio and workability in two different quantities of retarders. Mixed compositions were also prepared by replacing sand with rubber or glass aggregates to create lightweight aggregate-based mortars. In addition, fly ash, a widely used material (but that will not be available in the next few years), was replaced with silica fume. They found that two formulations show appropriate rheological compressive properties.
Martinez et al. [35] fabricated lightweight composite fused filament fabrication 3D printing toroidal samples based on a polyphenylene sulfide matrix and carbonyl iron particles. They tested it in electromagnetic performance and temperature resistance and compared it to those of commercial iron-filled polylactic acid (PLA) electromagnetic properties. They approved that this new high-temperature printable composite paves the way for developing efficient, low-cost, low weight, low power consumption and temperature-stable absorbers for microwave applications.
Mendizabal et al. [36] presented the novel ADDICOMP technology, which is an alternative preform manufacturing method using an additive high fibre content (up to 90%) polymeric coated process based on the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. In addition, they presented the two developing phases of high fibre percentages ADDICOMP technology for manufacturing continuous fibre reinforcements for lightweight parts for the transport sector. The manufacturing phases include (a) the development of continuous fibre filaments coated with a polymeric material printable by the FFF process and (b) fine-tuning the FFF technology to print filaments with a very high content of continuous fibre.
Psihoyos and Lampeas [37] developed a thermomechanical model for residual strain and stress (due to high-temperature gradients developed and thermal cycles) for predictions of laser power bed fusion (LPBF) parts quality and process optimisation. They tested the modelling efficiency of the proposed approach on a series of cases for which experimental data were available. The efficiency of the thermomechanical modelling method is demonstrated by the reduced computational time required.
A common denominator describes all the above-mentioned extensive studies, i.e., they used cutting-edge materials and methods for additive manufacturing. Consequently, it is apparent that the special issue was operated as a suitable help for introducing new and innovative studies in the field of functional materials for additive manufacturing.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Wei Z, Wu J, Shi N, et al. (2020) Review of conformal cooling system design and additive manufacturing for injection molds. Math Biosci Eng 17: 5414–5431. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020292 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020292
![]() |
[2] |
Chanes-Cuevas OA, Perez-Soria A, Cruz-Maya I, et al. (2018) Macro-, micro- and mesoporous materials for tissue engineering applications. AIMS Mater Sci 5: 1124–1140. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1124 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1124
![]() |
[3] |
Gibbons GJ, Williams R, Purnell P, et al. (2010) 3D Printing of cement composites. Adv Appl Ceram 109: 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1179/174367509X12472364600878 doi: 10.1179/174367509X12472364600878
![]() |
[4] |
Chaidas D, Kechagias JD (2022) An investigation of PLA/W parts quality fabricated by FFF. Mater Manuf Process 37: 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.1944193 doi: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1944193
![]() |
[5] |
Fountas NA, Kechagias JD, Zaoutsos SP, et al. (2022) Experimental and statistical study on the effects of fused filament fabrication parameters on the tensile strength of hybrid PLA/wood fabricated parts. Procedia Struct Integr 41: 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.05.072 doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.05.072
![]() |
[6] |
Pervaiz S, Qureshi TA, Kashwani G, et al. (2021) 3D printing of fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: A status review. Materials 14: 4520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164520 doi: 10.3390/ma14164520
![]() |
[7] |
Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC, et al. (2017) 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototy 12: 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724 doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724
![]() |
[8] |
Kechagias J, Chaidas D, Vidakis N, et al. (2022) Key parameters controlling surface quality and dimensional accuracy: a critical review of FFF process. Mater Manuf Process 37: 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.2032144 doi: 10.1080/10426914.2022.2032144
![]() |
[9] |
Özel T, Patel K, Fei J, et al. (2019) Cutting force investigation in face milling of additively fabricated nickel alloy 625 via powder bed fusion. Int J Mechatron Manuf Syst 12: 196. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMS.2019.10025072 doi: 10.1504/IJMMS.2019.10025072
![]() |
[10] |
Yadav P, Fu Z, Knorr M, et al. (2020) Binder jetting 3D printing of titanium aluminides based materials: A feasibility study. Adv Eng Mater 22: 2000408. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202000408 doi: 10.1002/adem.202000408
![]() |
[11] |
Todaro CJ, Easton MA, Qiu D, et al. (2020) Grain structure control during metal 3D printing by high-intensity ultrasound. Nat Commun 11: 142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13874-z doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13874-z
![]() |
[12] |
Cheng YL, Chang CH, Kuo C (2020) Experimental study on leveling mechanism for material-jetting-type color 3D printing. Rapid Prototyp J 26: 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2018-0227 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-09-2018-0227
![]() |
[13] |
Kechagias J (2007) Investigation of LOM process quality using design of experiments approach. Rapid Prototyp J 13: 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710824823 doi: 10.1108/13552540710824823
![]() |
[14] |
Kechagias JD, Vidakis N (2022) Parametric optimization of material extrusion 3D printing process: an assessment of Box-Behnken vs. full-factorial experimental approach. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 121: 3163–3172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09532-2 doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-09532-2
![]() |
[15] | Kechagias J, Anagnostopoulos V, Zervos S, et al. (1997) Estimation of build times in rapid prototyping processes. 6th European Conference on Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing, Nottingham, 137–148. |
[16] |
Hiremath P, Gowrishankar MC, Shettar M, et al. (2021) Influence of normalizing post carburizing treatment on microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of low alloy gear steels. AIMS Mater Sci 8: 836–851. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2021051 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021051
![]() |
[17] |
Di Schino A (2019) Corrosion behavior of new generation super-ferritic stainless steels. AIMS Mater Sci 6: 646–656. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2019.5.646 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.5.646
![]() |
[18] |
Soyama H, Okura Y (2018) The use of various peening methods to improve the fatigue strength of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V manufactured by electron beam melting. AIMS Mater Sci 5: 1000–1015. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.5.1000 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.5.1000
![]() |
[19] |
Gladman AS, Garcia-Leiner M, Sauer-Budge AF (2019) Emerging polymeric materials in additive manufacturing for use in biomedical applications. AIMS Bioeng 6: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2019.1.1 doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2019.1.1
![]() |
[20] |
Kechagias J, Maropoulos S, Karagiannis S (2004) Process build‐time estimator algorithm for laminated object manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 10: 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540410562331 doi: 10.1108/13552540410562331
![]() |
[21] |
Ambrosi A, Pumera M (2016) 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications. Chem Soc Rev 45: 2740–2755. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00714C doi: 10.1039/C5CS00714C
![]() |
[22] |
Reddy YP, Narayana KL, Mallik MK (2022) Experimental evaluation of additively deposited functionally graded material samples-microscopic and spectroscopic analysis of SS-316L/Co-Cr-Mo alloy. AIMS Mater Sci 9: 653–667. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2022040 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022040
![]() |
[23] |
Muhammad MS, Kerbache L, Elomri A (2021) Potential of additive manufacturing for upstream automotive supply chains. Supply Chain Forum 23: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1973872 doi: 10.1080/16258312.2021.1973872
![]() |
[24] |
Joshi SC, Sheikh AA (2015) 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual Phys Prototy 10: 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1111519 doi: 10.1080/17452759.2015.1111519
![]() |
[25] |
Wu L, Dai N, Wang H (2021) Evaluation of rods deformation of metal lattice structure in additive manufacturing based on skeleton extraction technology. Math Biosci Eng 18: 7525–7538. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021372 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021372
![]() |
[26] |
Liu Z, Zhang P, Yan M, et al. (2019) Additive manufacturing of specific ankle-foot orthoses for persons after stroke: A preliminary study based on gait analysis data. Math Biosci Eng 16: 8134-8143. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2019410 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019410
![]() |
[27] |
Borgianni Y, Pradel P, Berni A, et al. (2022) An investigation into the current state of education in design for additive manufacturing. J Eng Design 33: 461–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2102893 doi: 10.1080/09544828.2022.2102893
![]() |
[28] |
He C, Zhang M, Fang Z (2020) 3D printing of food: pretreatment and post-treatment of materials. Crit Rev Food Sci 60: 2379–2392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1641065 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1641065
![]() |
[29] |
Javaid M, Haleem A (2019) Using additive manufacturing applications for design and development of food and agricultural equipments. Int J Mater Prod Tec 58: 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2019.097662 doi: 10.1504/IJMPT.2019.097662
![]() |
[30] |
Spahiu T, Al-Arabiyat M, Martens Y, et al. (2018) Adhesion of 3D printing polymers on textile fabrics for garment production. IOP Conf Ser-Mater Sci Eng 459: 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/459/1/012065 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/459/1/012065
![]() |
[31] | Kumar P, Sharma SK, Singh RKR (2022) Recent trends and future outlooks in manufacturing methods and applications of FGM: a comprehensive review. Mater Manuf Process 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.2075892 |
[32] |
Zhou LY, Fu J, He Y (2020) A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater 30: 2000187. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000187 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202000187
![]() |
[33] |
Rafiee M, Abidnejad R, Ranta A, et al. (2021) Exploring the possibilities of FDM filaments comprising natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites for additive manufacturing. AIMS Mater Sci 8: 524–537. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2021032 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021032
![]() |
[34] |
Volpe S, Petrella A, Sangiorgio V, et al. (2021) Preparation and characterization of novel environmentally sustainable mortars based on magnesium potassium phosphate cement for additive manufacturing. AIMS Mater Sci 8: 640–658. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2021039 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021039
![]() |
[35] |
Martinez L, Palessonga D, Roquefort P, et al. (2021) Development of a high temperature printable composite for microwave absorption applications. AIMS Mater Sci 8: 739–747. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2021044 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021044
![]() |
[36] |
Mendizabal MA, Garcia M, Palenzuela L, et al. (2022) Obtaining preforms by additive fused deposition modelling (FDM) extrusion technology for the manufacture of high-performance composites. AIMS Mater Sci 9: 481–497. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2022028 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022028
![]() |
[37] |
Psihoyos HO, Lampeas GN (2022) Efficient thermomechanical modelling of Laser Powder Bed Fusion additive manufacturing process with emphasis on parts residual stress fields. AIMS Mater Sci 9: 455–480. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2022027 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022027
![]() |
1. | Mohamed Benamira, Naamane Benhassine, Amar Ayad, Azzeddine Dekhane, Investigation of printing parameters effects on mechanical and failure properties of 3D Printed PLA, 2023, 13506307, 107218, 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107218 | |
2. | Kaltrine Jakupi, Vladimir Dukovski, Gezim Hodolli, Joanna Rydz, Surface Roughness Modeling of Material Extrusion PLA Flat Surfaces, 2023, 2023, 1687-9430, 1, 10.1155/2023/8844626 | |
3. | Tingli Wang, Qiang Tong, Qiushuang Zhang, Hualin Yang, Research of tangential additive manufacturing based on multiaxis and contour blades, 2023, 128, 0268-3768, 789, 10.1007/s00170-023-11972-3 | |
4. | Ewelina Mackiewicz, Tomasz Wejrzanowski, Remigiusz Nowacki, Jakub Jaroszewicz, Jakub Marchewka, Łukasz Wilk, Patryk Bezkosty, Maciej Sitarz, 3D hierarchical porous structures printed from a silica-nickel composite paste, 2023, 33, 23529407, 101859, 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.101859 | |
5. | Arslan Yousaf, Ans Al Rashid, Muammer Koç, Parameter tuning for sustainable 3D Printing(3DP) of clay structures, 2024, 23071877, 10.1016/j.jer.2024.05.027 | |
6. | John D. Kechagias, Effects of thermomechanical parameters on surface texture in filament materials extrusion: outlook and trends, 2024, 13, 2046-1402, 1039, 10.12688/f1000research.144965.1 | |
7. | Behnam Akhoundi, Fatemeh Sousani, An experimental investigation of screw-based material extrusion 3D printing of metallic parts, 2024, 12, 23071877, 226, 10.1016/j.jer.2023.100102 | |
8. | Changhyun (Lyon) Nam, Case study of potential design perceptions for 3D printed accessories made of used face masks, 2025, 5, 2770-4580, 1, 10.3934/ctr.2025001 |