Dispersion of particulate in solvent cast magnetic thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer composites

Thomas J. Lee; Andrew H. Morgenstern; Thomas A. Höft; Brittany B. Nelson-Cheeseman; Thomas J. Lee; Andrew H. Morgenstern; Thomas A. Höft; Brittany B. Nelson-Cheeseman

doi:10.3934/matersci.2019.3.354

AIMS Materials Science

2019, Volume 6, Issue 3: 354-362. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.3.354

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Dispersion of particulate in solvent cast magnetic thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer composites

1.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN 55105, USA
2.
Department of Mathematics, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN 55105, USA

Received: 16 February 2019 Accepted: 25 April 2019 Published: 06 May 2019

Our research focuses on the processing of a thermoplastic magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) by solvent-casting a thermoplastic polyurethane (PU) elastomer with magnetic particulate for fused filament fabrication (FFF) applications. MREs are typically prepared by curing a thermoset silicone with magnetic particulate. Alternatively, thermoplastic MREs may be produced by the addition of magnetic particulate to a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE). FFF is a valuable manufacturing technique that allows for the creation of parts with inherent anisotropies. For the case of an MRE, FFF allows for the production of structures with tunable magnetic susceptibility along different axes. In these composites, the degree of particulate dispersion significantly affects the isotropy of material properties, which becomes increasingly important when small material volumes are used, such as in FFF. Incorporating solvent-casting as a method of producing polymer composites allows for greater control over the particulate addition method, leading to improved dispersion when compared to a polymer melt. For our purposes, composite films were produced in order to examine the effect of wet vs. dry addition of particulate on dispersion. The solvent used for casting was dimethylformamide (DMF). Preparation of polymer solutions included dissolution of PU in DMF to 20 w/v% followed by addition of the magnetic particulate. The particulates used were <150 µm iron powder and 2–4 µm magnetite powder. Composite solutions were made to concentrations of 20, 30, and 40 w/w% particulate to polymer by addition of either dry particulate or particulate pre-suspended in DMF. It was found that wet addition of particulate led to improvement in particulate agglomeration and magnetite particulate exhibited a significantly higher degree of agglomeration than iron.
- thermoplastic elastomer,
- magnetorheological elastomer,
- magnetic elastomer,
- solvent casting,
- particulate dispersion
Citation: Thomas J. Lee, Andrew H. Morgenstern, Thomas A. Höft, Brittany B. Nelson-Cheeseman. Dispersion of particulate in solvent cast magnetic thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer composites[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(3): 354-362. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.3.354

Related Papers:

Abstract

Our research focuses on the processing of a thermoplastic magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) by solvent-casting a thermoplastic polyurethane (PU) elastomer with magnetic particulate for fused filament fabrication (FFF) applications. MREs are typically prepared by curing a thermoset silicone with magnetic particulate. Alternatively, thermoplastic MREs may be produced by the addition of magnetic particulate to a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE). FFF is a valuable manufacturing technique that allows for the creation of parts with inherent anisotropies. For the case of an MRE, FFF allows for the production of structures with tunable magnetic susceptibility along different axes. In these composites, the degree of particulate dispersion significantly affects the isotropy of material properties, which becomes increasingly important when small material volumes are used, such as in FFF. Incorporating solvent-casting as a method of producing polymer composites allows for greater control over the particulate addition method, leading to improved dispersion when compared to a polymer melt. For our purposes, composite films were produced in order to examine the effect of wet vs. dry addition of particulate on dispersion. The solvent used for casting was dimethylformamide (DMF). Preparation of polymer solutions included dissolution of PU in DMF to 20 w/v% followed by addition of the magnetic particulate. The particulates used were <150 µm iron powder and 2–4 µm magnetite powder. Composite solutions were made to concentrations of 20, 30, and 40 w/w% particulate to polymer by addition of either dry particulate or particulate pre-suspended in DMF. It was found that wet addition of particulate led to improvement in particulate agglomeration and magnetite particulate exhibited a significantly higher degree of agglomeration than iron.

References

[1]	Kikuchi T, Kobayashi Y, Kawai M, et al. (2018) Elastic properties of magnetorheological elastomers in a heterogeneous uniaxial magnetic field. Int J Mol Sci 19: 3045. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103045
[2]	Mohamad N, Ubaidillah, Mazlan SA, et al. (2018) A comparative work on the magnetic field-dependent properties of plate-like and spherical iron particle-based magnetorheological grease. PloS One 13: e0191795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191795
[3]	Cremer P, Löwen H, Menzel AM (2016) Superelastic stress–strain behavior in ferrogels with different types of magneto-elastic coupling. Phy Chem Chem Phys 18: 26670–26690. doi: 10.1039/C6CP05079D
[4]	Patton MV, Ryan P, Calascione T, et al. (2019) Manipulating magnetic anisotropy in fused filament fabricated parts via macroscopic shape, mesoscopic infill orientation, and infill percentage. Addit Manuf 27: 482–488. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.026
[5]	Krueger H, Vaezi M, Yang S (2014) 3D Printing of Magnetorheological Elastomers (MREs) Smart Materials. 1st International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM 2014), 26–28 May 2014, Singapore.
[6]	Šupová M, Martynková GS, Barabaszová K (2011) Effect of nanofillers dispersion in polymer matrices: a review. Sci Adv Mater 3: 1–25.
[7]	Sin DC, Miao X, Liu G, et al. (2010) Polyurethane (PU) scaffolds prepared by solvent casting/particulate leaching (SCPL) combined with centrifugation. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater 30: 78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2009.09.002
[8]	Wosek J (2015) Fabrication of composite polyurethane/hydroxyapatite scaffolds using solvent-casting salt leaching technique. Adv Mater Sci 15: 14–20.
[9]	Siemann U (2005) Solvent cast technology-A versatile tool for thin film production. Prog Colloid Polym Sci 130: 1–14.
[10]	Jouault N, Zhao D, Kumar SK (2014) Role of casting solvent on nanoparticle dispersion in polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 47: 5246–5255. doi: 10.1021/ma500619g
[11]	Schruben DL, Gonzalez P (2000) Dispersity improvement in solvent casting particle/polymer composite. Polym Eng Sci 40: 139–142. doi: 10.1002/pen.11147
[12]	Ali A, Zafar H, Zia M, et al. (2016) Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 9: 49–67. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S99986
[13]	Benson JM, Snyders E (2015) The need for powder characterisation in the additive manufacturing industry and the establishment of a national facility. S Afr J Ind Eng 26: 104–114.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)