Global images vs cultural images: mixed methods to deepen territorial representations

Valentina Albanese; Valentina Albanese

doi:10.3934/geosci.2022032

AIMS Geosciences

2022, Volume 8, Issue 4: 593-608. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022032

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Global images vs cultural images: mixed methods to deepen territorial representations

Valentina Albanese ^,

Department of Law, Economy and Culture, University of Insubria, Como, Italy

Received: 02 June 2022 Revised: 09 August 2022 Accepted: 23 August 2022 Published: 08 September 2022

This paper aims at investigating images of places as a narrative element. In particular, dichotomous reference will be made to the global images of places that arise from dominant narratives versus the cultural images of places that arise from sensorial and experienced life.

Starting from theoretical reflection on the role of images and narratives with respect to the perception, imagery and experience of places, this contribution will focus on the sense of place and the influence of direct experience on its formation. The work deepens critical issues and capabilities of the digital visual methodology combined with sensory ethnography. The research, from an empirical point of view, was carried out as a teaching laboratory during the Geography for Tourism Science course at the University of Insubria. The students were invited to direct observation of their own place of life, with the aim of analysing its cultural image, and also to mediated observation of a known place not known directly but known through famous images and representations, with the aim of analysing its global image. This exercise outdoor allowed students to compare the theoretical concepts learned in the classroom with their perceptions of their everyday geographies, transferring the study of theory to everyday life as a tool to better understand their own and daily experience.
- geography teaching,
- sensory ethnography,
- digital visual methods,
- narrative geographies
Citation: Valentina Albanese. Global images vs cultural images: mixed methods to deepen territorial representations[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(4): 593-608. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022032

Related Papers:

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating images of places as a narrative element. In particular, dichotomous reference will be made to the global images of places that arise from dominant narratives versus the cultural images of places that arise from sensorial and experienced life.

Starting from theoretical reflection on the role of images and narratives with respect to the perception, imagery and experience of places, this contribution will focus on the sense of place and the influence of direct experience on its formation. The work deepens critical issues and capabilities of the digital visual methodology combined with sensory ethnography. The research, from an empirical point of view, was carried out as a teaching laboratory during the Geography for Tourism Science course at the University of Insubria. The students were invited to direct observation of their own place of life, with the aim of analysing its cultural image, and also to mediated observation of a known place not known directly but known through famous images and representations, with the aim of analysing its global image. This exercise outdoor allowed students to compare the theoretical concepts learned in the classroom with their perceptions of their everyday geographies, transferring the study of theory to everyday life as a tool to better understand their own and daily experience.

References

[1]	Turco A (2012) Turismo & Territorialità. Milano: Franco Angeli.
[2]	Ryan ML, Foote K, Azaryahu M (2016) Narrating Space/Spatializing Narrative. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
[3]	Ricoeur P (1981) Narrative time. In Mitchell JWC (Ed.), On narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[4]	Bal M (1990) The Point of Narratology Narratology. Poetics Today 11: 727–753. https://doi.org/10.2307/1773075 doi: 10.2307/1773075
[5]	Chatman S (1978) Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: NY Cornell University Press.
[6]	Fauconnier G (1985) Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[7]	Friedman SS (1993) Spatialization: A strategy for reading narrative. Narrative 1: 12–23.
[8]	Turner M (1996) The literary mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
[9]	Ryan ML (2009) Space. In Hü hn P, Pier J, Schmid W, et al., (Eds.), Handbook of narratology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
[10]	Lindón A, Hiernaux D (2010) Los giros de la Geografía Humana. Desafíos y horizontes, Anthropos e UAM. Iztapalapa, Messico.
[11]	Turco A (2015) Ontologia della territorialità: diciottesima contraddizione del capitalismo? Boll Soc Geogr Ital 8: 403–415.
[12]	Dell'Agnese E (2007) Tu vuo' fa l'Americano: la costruzione della mascolinità nella geopolitica popolare italiana. In Dell'Agnese E, Ruspini E, (Eds.), Mascolinità all'italiana. Costruzioni, narrazioni, mutamenti. Torino: Utet.
[13]	Couldry N, McCarty A (2005) Mediaspace. Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age. London: Routledge.
[14]	Murray J (1997) Hamlet on the holodeck: the future of narrative cyberspace. Free Press.
[15]	Kellerman A (2016) Geographic Interpretations of the Internet. London: Springer.
[16]	Davis LJ (1987) Resisting novels: Ideology and Fiction. New Yotk-London: Methuen.
[17]	Westphal B (2009) Geocritica, reale, finzione, spazio. Roma: Armando Editore.
[18]	Aime M, Papotti D (2018) Piccolo lessico della diversità. Treviso: Fondazione Benetton Studi Ricerche.
[19]	Fiorani E (2001) Il consumo del Mondo. In Bonora P, (Ed.), Comcities. Bologna: Baskerville.
[20]	Leszczynski A (2019) Digital Methods Ⅱ: Digital Visual Methods. Prog Hum Geogr 43: 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518787997
[21]	Rose G (1993) Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
[22]	Rose G (2016) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
[23]	Pink S (2015) Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage.
[24]	Garrett BL (2010) Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Prog Dev Stud 34: 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510388337. doi: 10.1177/0309132510388337
[25]	Litvin SW, Goldsmith RE, Pan B (2008) Electronic Word-of-Mouth in Hospitality and Tourism Management. Tourism Manage 29: 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011
[26]	Rojas-Rivasa E, Rendón-Domíngueza A, Felipe-Salinasb JA, et al. (2020) What Is Gastronomy? An Exploratory Study of Social Representation of Gastronomy and Mexican Cuisine among Experts and Consumers using a Qualitative Approach. Food Qual Preference 83: 103930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103930 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103930
[27]	Lave J, Wenger E (2006) L'apprendimento situato. Dall'osservazione alla partecipazione attiva nei contesti sociali. Trento: Edizioni Erickson.
[28]	Sunderlanda N, Bristedab H, Gudesa O, et al. (2012) What does it feel like to live here? Exploring sensory ethnography as a collaborative methodology for investigating social determinants of health in place. Health Place 18: 1056–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.007
[29]	Eco U (1977) Dalla periferia all'Impero. Milano: Bompiani.
[30]	Farinelli F (2007) Dopo la Misura. In Soja EW, Dopo la Metropoli. Bologna: Pàtron, 347–353.
[31]	Soja EW (2007) Dopo la metropoli. Per una critica della geografia urbana. Bologna: Pàtron.
[32]	Boccia Artieri G (2012) Stati di connessione. Pubblici, cittadini e consumatori nella (Social) Network Society. Milano: Franco Angeli.
[33]	Augé M (1992) Non-lieux. Paris, Seuil.
[34]	Vittadini N (2003) Il cibersapzio tra performance e socialità. Comun Soc 25: 14–26.
[35]	Simandan D (2011) The wise stance in human geography. Trans Inst Br Geogr 36: 188–192.
[36]	Simandan D (2016) Proximity, subjectivity, and space: Rethinking distance in human geography. Geoforum 75: 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.018 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.018
[37]	Simandan D (2020) Being surprised and surprising ourselves: a geography of personal and social change. Prog Hum Geogr 44: 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518810431 doi: 10.1177/0309132518810431
[38]	Cosgrove D (2006) Modernity, community and the landscape idea. J Mater Cult 11: 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506062992 doi: 10.1177/1359183506062992
[39]	Cosgrove DE (2006) Geographical Imagination and the Authority of Images (Hettner Lecture 2005). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
[40]	Cosgrove D (2008) Geography and Vision: Seeing, Imagining and Representing the World. London: IB Tauris.
[41]	Gregory D (1991) Interventions in the historical geography of modernity: Social theory, spatiality and the politics of representation. Geogr Ann Ser B Human Geogr 73: 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1991.11879613 doi: 10.1080/04353684.1991.11879613
[42]	Gregory D (1995) Imaginative geographies. Prog Hum Geogr 19: 447–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259501900402 doi: 10.1177/030913259501900402
[43]	Gregory D (1998) Power, knowledge and geography. The Hettner lecture in human geography. Geogr Z 1998: 70–93.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)