Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Existence of normalized solutions for a Sobolev supercritical Schrödinger equation

  • This paper studies the existence of normalized solutions for the following Schrödinger equation with Sobolev supercritical growth:

    {Δu+V(x)u+λu=f(u)+μ|u|p2u,inRN,RN|u|2dx=a2,

    where p>2:=2NN2, N3, a>0, λR is an unknown Lagrange multiplier, VC(RN,R), f satisfies weak mass subcritical conditions. By employing the truncation technique, we establish the existence of normalized solutions to this Sobolev supercritical problem. Our primary contribution lies in our initial exploration of the case p>2, which represents an unfixed frequency problem.

    Citation: Quanqing Li, Zhipeng Yang. Existence of normalized solutions for a Sobolev supercritical Schrödinger equation[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(12): 6761-6771. doi: 10.3934/era.2024316

    Related Papers:

    [1] Lingzheng Kong, Haibo Chen . Normalized solutions for nonlinear Kirchhoff type equations in high dimensions. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(4): 1282-1295. doi: 10.3934/era.2022067
    [2] Hui Jian, Min Gong, Meixia Cai . Global existence, blow-up and mass concentration for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation with inverse-square potential. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7427-7451. doi: 10.3934/era.2023375
    [3] Xian Zhang, Chen Huang . Existence and multiplicity of sign-changing solutions for supercritical quasi-linear Schrödinger equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 656-674. doi: 10.3934/era.2023032
    [4] Kaiyu Zhang . Sobolev estimates and inverse Hölder estimates on a class of non-divergence variation-inequality problem arising in American option pricing. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 5975-5987. doi: 10.3934/era.2024277
    [5] Haijun Luo, Zhitao Zhang . Existence and stability of normalized solutions to the mixed dispersion nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2871-2898. doi: 10.3934/era.2022146
    [6] Qihong Shi, Yaqian Jia, Xunyang Wang . Global solution in a weak energy class for Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger system. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(2): 633-643. doi: 10.3934/era.2022033
    [7] Yong Liu, Kelei Wang, Juncheng Wei, Ke Wu . Qualitative properties of stable solutions to some supercritical problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(5): 1668-1690. doi: 10.3934/era.2022084
    [8] Cheng Ma . Normalized solutions for the mixed dispersion nonlinear Schrödinger equations with four types of potentials and mass subcritical growth. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 3759-3775. doi: 10.3934/era.2023191
    [9] Yong Zhou, Jia Wei He, Ahmed Alsaedi, Bashir Ahmad . The well-posedness for semilinear time fractional wave equations on RN. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2981-3003. doi: 10.3934/era.2022151
    [10] Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc . Elliptic equations in R2 involving supercritical exponential growth. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5341-5356. doi: 10.3934/era.2024247
  • This paper studies the existence of normalized solutions for the following Schrödinger equation with Sobolev supercritical growth:

    {Δu+V(x)u+λu=f(u)+μ|u|p2u,inRN,RN|u|2dx=a2,

    where p>2:=2NN2, N3, a>0, λR is an unknown Lagrange multiplier, VC(RN,R), f satisfies weak mass subcritical conditions. By employing the truncation technique, we establish the existence of normalized solutions to this Sobolev supercritical problem. Our primary contribution lies in our initial exploration of the case p>2, which represents an unfixed frequency problem.



    In this paper, we study the existence of L2-normalized solutions to the following equation:

    {Δu+V(x)u+λu=f(u)+μ|u|p2u,inRN,RN|u|2dx=a2, (1.1)

    where p>2:=2NN2, N3, f:RR is a nonlinear function, that is not necessarily of the power type, and the mass a>0 is given, while a pair (λ,u)R×H1(RN) is unknown.

    Problem (1.1) appears when searching for standing waves to the following nonlinear Schrödinger equation

    itψ=2Δψ+V(x)ψf(ψ)μ|ψ|p2ψ,(t,x)(0,T)×RN (1.2)

    i.e. solutions to (1.2) of the form ψ(t,x)=eiλtu(x) for some λR. The constraint RN|u|2dx=a2 comes from the fact that, under suitable assumptions on f, a solution ψ of (1.2) preserves such a quantity in time RN|ψ(t,x)|2dx=RN|ψ(0,x)|2dx for all t(0,T).

    To date, two distinct perspectives have emerged regarding the frequency λ in Eq (1.1). One approach views λ as a predetermined constant, leading to the so-called fixed frequency problem. Extensive research has been conducted on the existence, multiplicity, and concentration of nontrivial solutions to (1.1) under various assumptions on the nonlinearity f and the potential V, encompassing Sobolev subcritical, critical, and supercritical growth regimes (see [1,2,3]).

    Alternatively, λ can be considered an unknown quantity within Eq (1.1). In this context, it is natural to prescribe the value of the mass, allowing λ to be interpreted as a Lagrange multiplier. Notably, the mass possesses a clear physical significance. For instance, in Bose-Einstein condensates, λ corresponds to the chemical potential, representing the energy required to add one particle to the system. In nonlinear optics, λ reflects the refractive index shift induced by nonlinear effects. Thus, λ is not merely a Lagrange multiplier in the mathematical model but is also closely tied to the system's physical properties, offering insights into its dynamics and characteristics.

    Furthermore, such solutions offer valuable insights into the dynamical properties of the system, including orbital stability or instability, and can effectively describe attractive Bose-Einstein condensates. In the mathematical literature, these types of solutions are commonly referred to as prescribed L2-norm solutions or normalized solutions. We refer to [4,5,6] and references therein.

    In recent decades, the existence of L2-normalized solutions has been a topic of active research, resulting in a substantial body of literature. The L2-critical exponent p, defined as

    p=2+4N (1.3)

    plays a key role in analyzing (1.1) and the stability properties of (1.2), as discussed in [7]. Note that p(2,2), where, as usual, 2=2NN2 for N3, and 2= for N=2.

    To illustrate the importance of the L2-critical exponent p, consider q(2,2) and λ>0. Recall that the equation

    ΔQ+λQ=|Q|q2Q in RN,

    has a unique positive solution up to translations (see Kwong [8]). Its unique positive radial solution is denoted by Qq,λ. It is easily observed that

    Qq,λ=λ1q2Qq,1(λ12)

    where Qq,1 is the unique positive radial solution of

    ΔQ+Q=|Q|q2Q in RN.

    Setting the mass

    M(u)=12RNu2dx,

    and the energy

    Eq(u)=12RN|u|2dx1qRN|u|qdx,

    it follows from the Pohozaev identity that

    M(Qq,λ)=λN2(q2)(pq)M(Qq,1),
    Eq(Qq,λ)=λ2q2N2+1Eq(Qq,1),

    and

    Eq(Qq,1)=N(qp)(N+2)(N2)(q1)M(Qq,1).

    Thus we see that p=2+4N plays a special role. Indeed, considering three cases

    (1) q(2,p),  (2) q(p,2),  (3) q=p,

    then the energy Eq(u) of a solution (λ,u) for (1.1) satisfies

    Eq(u){<0 for Case (1), >0 for Case (2), =0 for Case (3). 

    Recent studies have concentrated on normalized solutions of the Schrödinger equation, with particular attention to the Sobolev subcritical case. Soave [9] examined the existence and properties of ground states for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation involving combined power nonlinearities:

    Δu+λu=μ|u|q2u+|u|p2u,xRN

    on

    S(a):={uH1(RN):RNu2dx=a2},

    where N1, 2<q2+4Np<2. Yang et al. [10] obtained the existence and multiplicity of normalized solutions to the following Schrödinger equations with potentials and non-autonomous nonlinearities:

    {Δu+V(x)u+λu=f(x,u),inRN,RNu2dx=a2,

    where f(x,s) satisfies Berestycki-Lions type conditions with mass subcritical growth. Claudianor, Alves and Thin [11,12] investigated the existence of multiple normalized solutions to the following class of elliptic problems:

    {Δu+V(x)u+λu=f(u),inRN,RNu2dx=a2,

    under different assumptions about potentials, but f verifies weak mass subcritical growth. For Sobolev critical case, Soave [13] considered the Sobolev critical problem

    {Δu+λu=μ|u|q2u+|u|22u,xRN,RN|u|2dx=a2, (1.4)

    where 2+4N<q<2, N3, but the upper boundedness of μa(1γq)q is essential. Li and Zou [14] obtained the existence of ground states for (1.4) that does not depend on the range of μa(1γq)q, which improves and extends the result in [13]. Bieganowski and Mederski [15] proposed a simple minimization method based on the direct minimization of the energy functional on the linear combination of Nehari and Pohozaev constraints to prove the existence of normalized ground states to

    Δu+λu=g(u)

    for the Sobolev subcritical equation.

    Existing research predominantly concentrates on normalized solutions within the context of Sobolev subcritical or critical problems. To the best of our knowledge, the Sobolev supercritical case has not been explored in relation to normalized solutions. In this paper, we delve into this intriguing subject and introduce the following assumptions:

    (V) VC(RN,R), 0<V0:=infxRNV(x)V(x)V:=lim|x|V(x)<+ for all xRN.

    (f1) fC(R,R) is odd, and there exist m(2,2+4N) and α(0,+) such that

    limt0|f(t)||t|m1=α.

    (f2) There exist two constants C1, C2>0 and q(m,2+4N) such that

    |f(t)|C1+C2|t|q1, tR.

    (f3) f(t)tq1 is an increasing function of t on (0,+).

    Theorem 1.1. Suppose that (V) and (f1)-(f3) are satisfied. Then there exists some μ0>0 such that for μ(0,μ0], problem (1.1) admits a couple of weak solutions (u,λ)H1(RN)×R+ with RN|u|2dx=a2.

    Define a function

    ϕ(t)={|t|p2t, |t|M,Mpq|t|q2t, |t|>M,

    where M>0. Then

    ϕC(R,R),
    ϕ(t)tqΦ(t):=qt0ϕ(s)ds0

    and

    |ϕ(t)|Mpq|t|q1 for all tR.

    Set hμ(t)=μϕ(t)+f(t) for all tR. Then hμ(t) possesses the following properties:

    (h1)hμC(R,R) is odd, and limt0|hμ(t)||t|m1=α.

    (h2) |hμ(t)|μMpq|t|q1+C1+C2|t|q1 for all tR.

    (h3) hμ(t)tq1 is an increasing function of t on (0,+).

    (h4) hμ(t)tqHμ(t):=qt0hμ(s)ds0 for all tR.

    By (V) and (h1)-(h3) and [11], the following problem

    {Δu+V(x)u+λu=hμ(u),inRN,RN|u|2dx=a2,

    admits a couple (uμ,λ)H1(RN)×R+ of weak solutions with RN|uμ|2dx=a2. Let

    Jμ(u)=12RN|u|2dx+12RNV(x)u2dxRNHμ(u)dx.

    Then

    Jμ|S(a)(uμ)=0

    and

    Jμ(uμ)=γ0,a,μ:=infuS(a)J0,μ(u),

    where

    J0,μ(u)=12RN|u|2dxRNHμ(u)dx.

    Consequently, there exists λR such that

    Δuμ+V(x)uμ+λuμ=hμ(uμ). (2.1)

    Moreover, set

    J(u)=12RN|u|2dx+12RNV(x)u2dxRNF(u)dx

    and

    γ0,a:=infuS(a)J0(u),

    where

    J0(u)=12RN|u|2dxRNF(u)dx.

    Then, γ0,a,μγ0,a.

    Lemma 2.1. The solution uμ satisfies uμ222(qγ0,a+λa2)q2.

    Proof. By (2.1), we have

    0=RN|uμ|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2dx+λRN|uμ|2dxRNhμ(uμ)uμdx.

    Therefore,

    qγ0,a,μ=q22RN|uμ|2dx+q22RNV(x)|uμ|2dx+μRN[ϕ(uμ)uμqΦ(uμ)]dx+RN[f(uμ)uμqF(uμ)]dxλRN|uμ|2dxq22RN|uμ|2dxλRN|uμ|2dx.

    Which implies that the lemma holds.

    Lemma 2.2. There exist two constants B, D>0 independent of μ such that uμLB(1+μ)D.

    Proof. Let b:RR be a smooth function satisfying:

    b(s)=s for |s|T1;

    b(s)=b(s);

    b(s)=0 for sT;

    b(s) is decreasing in [T1,T].

    Set T>2, r>0, and ˜uTμ£º=b(uμ). It is easy to see that

    ˜uTμ=uμ  for  |uμ|T1;
    |˜uTμ|=|b(uμ)||uμ|  for  T1|uμ|T;
    |˜uTμ|=CT>0  for  |uμ|T,

    where T1CTT. Moreover, 0sb(s)b(s)1, s0. Let ψ=uμ|˜uTμ|2r. Then ψH1(RN). Taking ψ as the test function, there holds

    RNhμ(uμ)ψdx=RNuμψdx+RNV(x)uμψdx+λRNuμψdxRNuμ[uμ|˜uTμ|2r]dx+RNV(x)u2μ|˜uTμ|2rdx|uμ|T1(1+r)|˜uTμ|2r|uμ|2dx+|uμ|T|˜uTμ|2r|uμ|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx
    +T1<|uμ|<T[|˜uTμ|2r+2ruμb(uμ)b(uμ)|˜uTμ|2r2]|uμ|2dx|uμ|T1|˜uTμ|2r|uμ|2dx+|uμ|T|˜uTμ|2r|uμ|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx+T1<|uμ|<T[|˜uTμ|2r+2ruμb(uμ)b(uμ)|˜uTμ|2r2]|uμ|2dx1(r+1)2|uμ|T1|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+|uμ|T|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx
    +T1<|uμ|<T[|˜uTμ|2r+2ru2μ(b(uμ))2|˜uTμ|2r2]|uμ|2dx1(r+1)2|uμ|T1|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+|uμ|T|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx
    +T1<|uμ|<T[1(r+1)2|˜uTμ|2r+r(r+1)22ru2μ(b(uμ))2|˜uTμ|2r2]|uμ|2dx=1(r+1)2|uμ|T1|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+|uμ|T|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx
    +T1<|uμ|<T[1(r+1)2b2r(uμ)|uμ|2+2(r+1)2u2μ|br(uμ)|2]dx1(r+1)2|uμ|T1|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+|uμ|T|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx
        +2C1(r+1)2T1<|uμ|<T[b2r(uμ)|uμ|2+u2μ|br(uμ)|2]dx    1(r+1)2|uμ|T1|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+|uμ|T|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx    +C1(r+1)2T1<|uμ|<T|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx    C1(r+1)2RN|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx+RNV(x)|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx.

    As a consequence, from (h1) and (h2), for fixed μ>0 and small ε>0,

    |hμ(t)|V0|t|+(1+μ)C|t|21, tR.

    Combining with the above equations, we obtain

    C1(r+1)2RN|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx(1+μ)CRN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx.

    By the Sobolev embedding theorem,

    C2(r+1)2[RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r22dx]22C1(r+1)2RN|[uμ(˜uTμ)r]|2dx.

    As a result,

    [RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r22dx]22(1+μ)C(r+1)2RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rdx.

    Take r0>0 and rk=r0(22)k=rk122. Then

    [RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rkdx]12rk[1+μC(rk1+1)]1rk1[RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rk1dx]12rk1k1i=0[1+μC(ri+1)]1ri[RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0dx]12r0=k1i=0(1+μ)12rik1i=0[C(ri+1)]1ri[RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0dx]12r0=k1i=0(1+μ)12riexp{k1i=01riln[C(ri+1)]}[RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0dx]12r0.

    Notice that

    [RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0NN2dx]N2NC(r0+1)2RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0dxC(r0+1)2|uμ(x)|<ρ|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0dx+C(r0+1)2(|uμ(x)|ρ|uμ|2dx)2N(RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0NN2dx)N2N.

    Take ρ>0 be such that C(r0+1)2(|uμ(x)|ρ|uμ|2dx)2N<12. Then

    [RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0NN2dx]N2NC(r0+1)2|uμ(x)|<ρ|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0dxC.

    Set

    dk=exp{k1i=01riln[C(ri+1)]}

    and

    ek=k1i=0(1+μ)12ri=(1+μ)2(22)2r0[1(22)k].

    Then dkd as k and eke=(1+μ)2(22)2r0 as k. By Lemma 2.1, we have

    [RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2rkdx]12rkdkek[RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0dx]12r0dkek[(RN|uμ|2)2N(RN|uμ|2|˜uTμ|2r0NN2dx)N2N]12r0Cdkek(RN|uμ|2)1Nr0Cdkek.

    Using Fatous lemma in T+, we obtain

    uμ2+2rk2rk2+2rkCdkek.

    Consequently, let k, we obtain

    uμLCde=Cd(1+μ)2(22)2r0:=B(1+μ)D.

    This completes the proof.

    Proof of Theorem 1.1: For large M>0, we can choose small μ0>0 such that uμLB(1+μ)DM for all μ(0,μ0]. Which indicates hμ(uμ)=μ|uμ|p2uμ+f(uμ). Consequently, problem (1.1) admits a couple of weak solutions (uμ,λ)H1(RN)×R+ with RN|uμ|2dx=a2. This completes the proof.

    In this paper, we study the existence of normalized solutions for the following Schrödinger equation with Sobolev supercritical growth:

    {Δu+V(x)u+λu=f(u)+μ|u|p2u,inRN,RN|u|2dx=a2, (3.1)

    where p>2:=2NN2, N3, a>0, λR is an unknown Lagrange multiplier, VC(RN,R), f satisfies the following assumptions:

    (V) VC(RN,R), 0<V0:=infxRNV(x)V(x)V:=lim|x|V(x)<+ for all xRN.

    (f1) fC(R,R) is odd, and there exist m(2,2+4N) and α(0,+) such that

    limt0|f(t)||t|m1=α.

    (f2) There exist two constants C1, C2>0 and q(m,2+4N) such that

    |f(t)|C1+C2|t|q1, tR.

    (f3) f(t)tq1 is an increasing function of t on (0,+).

    By employing the truncation technique, we establish the existence of normalized solutions to this Sobolev supercritical problem. In particular, there exists some μ0>0 such that for μ(0,μ0], problem (3.1) admits a couple of weak solutions (u,λ)H1(RN)×R+ with RN|u|2dx=a2.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    Q. Li is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12261031), Yunnan Province Applied Basic Research for Key Project (202401AS070024), Yunnan Province Applied Basic Research for General Project (202301AT070141), and Youth Outstanding-notch Talent Support Program in Yunnan Province and the Project Funds of Xingdian Talent Support Program. Z. Yang is supported by the Xingdian talent support program of Yunnan Province, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12301145, 12261107), Yunnan Province Applied Basic Research for Youths Projects (202301AU070144), the Yunnan Province Applied Basic Research for General Project (202401AU070123), the Scientific Research Fund of Yunnan Educational Commission (2023J0199), and the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Modern Analytical Mathematics and Applications (202302AN360007).

    The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.



    [1] H. Berestycki, P. Lions, Nonlinear scalar field equations, I existence of a ground state, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 82 (1983), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250555 doi: 10.1007/BF00250555
    [2] H. Brezis, L. Nirenberg, Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 36 (1983), 437–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160360405 doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160360405
    [3] P. H. Rabinowitz, On a class of nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 43 (1992), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00946631 doi: 10.1007/BF00946631
    [4] Y. Ding, X. Zhong, Normalized solution to the Schrödinger equation with potential and general nonlinear term: Mass super-critical case, J. Differ. Equations, 334 (2022), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.06.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2022.06.013
    [5] Q. Guo, R. He, B. Li, S. Yan, Normalized solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving mass subcritical and supercritical exponents, J. Differ. Equations, 413 (2024), 462–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.08.071 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2024.08.071
    [6] S. Qi, W. Zou, Mass threshold of the limit behavior of normalized solutions to Schrödinger equations with combined nonlinearities, J. Differ. Equations, 375 (2023), 172–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2023.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2023.08.005
    [7] T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1090/cln/010
    [8] M. K. Kwong, Uniqueness of positive solutions of Δuu+up=0 in Rn, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 105 (1989), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251502 doi: 10.1007/BF00251502
    [9] N. Soave, Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities, J. Differ. Equations, 269 (2020), 6941–6987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2020.05.016
    [10] Z. Yang, S. Qi, W. Zou, Normalized solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with potentials and non-autonomous nonlinearities, J. Geom. Anal., 32 (2022), 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-022-00897-0 doi: 10.1007/s12220-022-00897-0
    [11] O. A. Claudianor, N. V. Thin, On existence of multiple normalized solutions to a class of elliptic problems in whole RN via Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55 (2023), 1264–1283. https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1470694 doi: 10.1137/22M1470694
    [12] C. O. Alves, N. V. Thin, On existence of multiple normalized solutions to a class of elliptic problems in whole RN via penalization method, Potential Anal., 61 (2024), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-023-10116-2 doi: 10.1007/s11118-023-10116-2
    [13] N. Soave, Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities: the Sobolev critical case, J. Funct. Anal., 279 (2020), 108610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108610 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108610
    [14] Q. Li, W. Zou, Normalized ground states for Sobolev critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the L2-supercritical case, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 44 (2024), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2023101 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2023101
    [15] B. Bieganowski, J. Mederski, Normalized ground states of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with at least mass critical growth, J. Funct. Anal., 280 (2011), 108989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2021.108989 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2021.108989
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(518) PDF downloads(77) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog