Research article

Florida’s recycled water footprint: a geospatial analysis of distribution (2009 and 2015)

  • Received: 26 September 2018 Accepted: 15 January 2019 Published: 01 March 2019
  • Water shortages resulting from increased demand or reduced supply may be addressed, in part, by redirecting recycled water for irrigation, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, and as effluent discharge returned to streams. Recycled water is an essential component of integrated water management and broader adoption of recycled water will increase water conservation in water-stressed coastal communities. This study examined spatial patterns of recycled water use in Florida in 2009 and 2015 to detect gaps in distribution, quantify temporal change, and identify potential areas for expansion. Databases of recycled water products and distribution centers for Florida in 2009 and 2015 were developed by combining the 2008 and 2012 Clean Water Needs Survey databases with Florida’s 2009 and 2015 Reuse Inventory databases, respectively. Florida increased recycled water production from 674.85 mgd in 2009 to 738.15 mgd in 2015, an increase of 63.30 mgd. The increase was primarily allocated to use in public access areas, groundwater recharge, and industrial reuse, all within the South Florida Water Management District (WMD). In particular, Miami was identified in 2009 as an area of opportunity for recycled water development, and by 2015 it had increased production and reduced the production gap. Overall, South Florida WMD had the largest increase in production of 44.38 mgd (69%), while Southwest Florida WMD decreased production of recycled water by 1.68 mgd, or 3%. Overall increase in use of recycled water may be related to higher demand due to increased population coupled with public programs and policy changes that promote recycled water use at both the municipal and individual level.

    Citation: Jana E. Archer, Ingrid E. Luffman, Arpita N. Nandi, T. Andrew Joyner. Florida’s recycled water footprint: a geospatial analysis of distribution (2009 and 2015)[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(1): 41-58. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.1.41

    Related Papers:

    [1] Syafrizal Sy, Rinovia Simanjuntak, Tamaro Nadeak, Kiki Ariyanti Sugeng, Tulus Tulus . Distance antimagic labeling of circulant graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21177-21188. doi: 10.3934/math.20241028
    [2] Bilal A. Rather, M. Aijaz, Fawad Ali, Nabil Mlaiki, Asad Ullah . On distance signless Laplacian eigenvalues of zero divisor graph of commutative rings. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12635-12649. doi: 10.3934/math.2022699
    [3] Robert Reynolds, Allan Stauffer . Definite integral of the logarithm hyperbolic secant function in terms of the Hurwitz zeta function. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1324-1331. doi: 10.3934/math.2021082
    [4] Kotte Amaranadha Reddy, S Sharief Basha . New classes of reverse super edge magic graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3590-3602. doi: 10.3934/math.2022198
    [5] Naila Mehreen, Rashid Farooq, Shehnaz Akhter . On partition dimension of fullerene graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2018, 3(3): 343-352. doi: 10.3934/Math.2018.3.343
    [6] Mohamed R. Zeen El Deen, Ghada Elmahdy . New classes of graphs with edge δ graceful labeling. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3554-3589. doi: 10.3934/math.2022197
    [7] Yingying Xiao, Chuanxi Zhu, Li Xie . Existence of ground state solutions for the modified Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations with general Choquard type nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7166-7176. doi: 10.3934/math.2022399
    [8] Yunfeng Wei, Hongwei Yang, Hongwang Yu . On stable solutions of the weighted Lane-Emden equation involving Grushin operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2623-2635. doi: 10.3934/math.2021159
    [9] Baskar Mari, Ravi Sankar Jeyaraj . Radio number of 2 super subdivision for path related graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8214-8229. doi: 10.3934/math.2024399
    [10] Wafaa Fakieh, Zakeiah Alkhamisi, Hanaa Alashwali . On the Aα-spectra of graphs and the relation between Aα- and Aα-spectra. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4587-4603. doi: 10.3934/math.2024221
  • Water shortages resulting from increased demand or reduced supply may be addressed, in part, by redirecting recycled water for irrigation, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, and as effluent discharge returned to streams. Recycled water is an essential component of integrated water management and broader adoption of recycled water will increase water conservation in water-stressed coastal communities. This study examined spatial patterns of recycled water use in Florida in 2009 and 2015 to detect gaps in distribution, quantify temporal change, and identify potential areas for expansion. Databases of recycled water products and distribution centers for Florida in 2009 and 2015 were developed by combining the 2008 and 2012 Clean Water Needs Survey databases with Florida’s 2009 and 2015 Reuse Inventory databases, respectively. Florida increased recycled water production from 674.85 mgd in 2009 to 738.15 mgd in 2015, an increase of 63.30 mgd. The increase was primarily allocated to use in public access areas, groundwater recharge, and industrial reuse, all within the South Florida Water Management District (WMD). In particular, Miami was identified in 2009 as an area of opportunity for recycled water development, and by 2015 it had increased production and reduced the production gap. Overall, South Florida WMD had the largest increase in production of 44.38 mgd (69%), while Southwest Florida WMD decreased production of recycled water by 1.68 mgd, or 3%. Overall increase in use of recycled water may be related to higher demand due to increased population coupled with public programs and policy changes that promote recycled water use at both the municipal and individual level.


    Let G be a finite, simple and connected graph. A family of subetaaphs H1,H2,,Ht is called an edge-covering if every edge from E(G) belongs to at least one of the subetaaphs Hi, i=1,2,,t. When Hi,i=1,2,,t is isomorphic to a given graph H, then graph G admits an H-covering. G is called an (α,d)-H-antimagic if there exists a total labeling ϕ:V(G)E(G){1,2,,v+e} with the H-weights,

    wtϕ(H)=vV(H)ϕ(v)+eE(H)ϕ(e),

    forming an arithmetic progression α,α+d,α+2d,,α+(t1)d, where α>0 and d0 are two integers and t is the number of all subetaaphs of G isomorphic to H. Moreover, G is said to be super (α,d)-H-antimagic if ϕ(V(G))={1,2,3,,|V(G)|}.

    The H-supermagic graph was first introduced by Gutiérrez and Lladó in [3]. Some other results can be seen from [4,7,8,9,10,11]. An (a,d)-H-antimagic labeling was introduced by Inayah et al. [5]. The further results on antimagic labeling are discussed in [2,6,16]. In [12], authors discussed the supermagic and super (α,1)-C4-antimagic labeling of book graph and its disjoint union. The super (a,d)-C3-antimagicness of a corona graph for differences d{0,1,,5} is discussed in [1]. M. A. Umar [14] study the existence of the super cycle-antimagic labeling of ladder graphs for differences d{0,1,,15}. M.A.Umar et al. [13] gives the super (α,d)-C4-antimagic labeling of book graphs for differences d=1,2,,13.

    In this research manuscript, we investigated the existence of super (α,1)-C4-antimagic labeling of stacked book graphs SB(p,q) that can be thought of as generalization of a book graph and super (α,1)-C4(r+1)-antimagic labeling of its r subdivided graph SB(p,q)(r).

    A Cartesian product of two graphs G1 and G2, denoted by G1G2, is the graph with vertex set V(G1)V(G2), where two vertices (u,u) and (v,v) are adjacent if and only if u=v and uvE(G2) or u=v and uvE(G1).

    A stacked book graph denoted by SB(p,q) is defined as the cartesian product of a star graph Sp on p+1 vertices with a path Pq on q vertices. i.e., SB(p,q)Sp+1Pq, where the symbol used to denote the cartesian product of two graphs. The stacked book graph SB(p,q) contains q(p+1) vertices and q(2p+1)(p+1) edges.

    The vertex set V(SB(p,q)) have the elements {c(j),x(j)i:1ip,1jq} and the edge set E(SB(p,q)) have the elements

    qj=1(pi=1{c(j)x(j)i})(pi=1(q1j=1{c(j)c(j+1),x(j)ix(j+1)i}))

    A typical picture of stacked book graph SB(p,q) is given in Figure 1:

    Figure 1.  Stacked book graph SB(4,5).

    Clearly stacked book graph SB(p,q) admits C4-covering. It will be worth noting for p=1, the stacked book graph SB(1,q) is a ladder graph P2Pq, for p=2, the stacked book graph SB(2,q) is a grid graph P2Pq and for q=2, the stacked book graph SB(p,2) is a book graph PpP2. Ming-Ju Lee et al. describe the super (α,1)-cycle-antimagic labeling of grid graph PpPq in [15]. M. A. Umar et al. [12] give the supermagic and super (α,1)-C4-antimagic labeling of book graph and its disjoint union while [13] describes the super (α,d)-C4-antimagic labeling of book graphs for differences d=1,2,,13. Therefore we consider p,q3 in this paper.

    Let Ci,j4 be the (i,j)th cycle for 1ip,1jq1 in SB(p,q). Each (i,j)th-cycle Ci,j4 in SB(p,q) has the vertex set {c(j),c(j+1),x(j)i,x(j+1)i} and the edge set {c(j)c(j+1),x(j)ix(j+1)i,c(j)x(j)i,c(j+1)x(j+1)i}.

    The corresponding Ci,j4-weight under a total labeling ϕ would be:

    wtϕ(Ci,j4)=vV(Ci,j4)ϕ(v)+eE(Ci,j4)ϕ(e).=j+1k=j(ϕ(x(k)i)+ϕ(c(k))+ϕ(c(k)x(k)i))+(ϕ(x(j)ix(j+1)i)+ϕ(c(j)c(j+1)))

    For our convenience, throughout this paper by i=¯1,p, we mean i=1,2,,p and vice versa.

    Theorem 1. Let p,q3 be positive integers and Sp be a star on p+1 vertices. Then stacked book graph SB(p,q) admits a super (α,1)-C4-antimagic labeling.

    Proof. The total labeling ϕ0 have the form:

    ϕ0(c(j))={q2+j2       j0   (mod2)j+12       j1   (mod2)
    ϕ0(x(j)i)=q+i+(j1)pif  i=¯1,p,j=¯1,qϕ0(c(j)x(j)i)=p(2q+1j)+q+1iif  i=¯1,p,j=¯1,qϕ0(c(j)c(j+1))=2q(p+1)jif  i=¯1,p,j=¯1,q1ϕ0(x(j)ix(j+1)i)=q(2p+1)+i(q1)+jif  i=¯1,p,j=¯1,q1

    Evidently,

    ϕ0(x(j)i)+ϕ(c(j)x(j)i)=2q(p+1)+1ϕ0(c(j))+ϕ(c(j+1))+ϕ(c(j)c(j+1))=q2+2q(p+1)+1 (2.1)

    and therefore,

    wtϕ0(Ci,j4) ϕ(x(j)ix(j+1)i)=6q(p+1)+3+q2 (2.2)

    Equations (2.1) and (2.2) gives:

    wtϕ0(Ci,j4)=8q(p+1)+2+q2+j+(i1)(q1) (2.3)

    For convenience, define wtϕ0(partial)=8q(p+1)+2+q2.

    Therefore the Ci,j4-weights are:

    wtϕ0(C1,14)={wtϕ0(partial)}+1wtϕ0(C1,24)={wtϕ0(partial)}+2.    .    .    wtϕ0(C1,q14)={wtϕ0(partial)}+q1wtϕ0(C2,14)={wtϕ0(partial)}+1+(q1)wtϕ0(C2,24)={wtϕ0(partial)}+2+(q1).    .    .    wtϕ0(C2,q14)={wtϕ0(partial)}+2(q1)wtϕ0(C2,q14)={wtϕ0(partial)}+2(q1)
    .    .    .    wtϕ0(Cp,14)={wtϕ0(partial)}+1+(P1)(q1)wtϕ0(Cp,24)={wtϕ0(partial)}+2+(P1)(q1).    .    .    wtϕ0(Cp,q14)={wtϕ0(partial)}+p(q1) (2.4)

    which makes the total labeling ϕ0 a super (α,1)-C4-antimagic labeling and the proof is complete.

    Let G be a graph and r1 be a positive integer. By G(r), we define r-subdivided graph of G constructed by inserting r new vertices into every edge of G.

    In this way, SB(p,q)(r) is the r-subdivided graph of stacked book graph with the vertex set {c(j),x(j)i,u(i,j)r:1ip,1jq}{ϵ(j)r,δ(i,j)r:1ip,1jq1} and the edge set

    {c(j)u(i,j)1,x(j)iu(i,j)r,u(i,j)ku(i,j)k+1:1ip,1jq,1kr1}
    {c(j)ϵ(j)1,c(j+1)ϵ(j)r,x(j)iδ(i,j)1,x(j+1)iδ(i,j)r,ϵ(j)kϵ(j)k+1,δ(i,j)kδ(i,j)k+1:1ip,1jq1,1kr1}

    where u(i,j)r, ϵ(j)r, δ(i,j)r are r new vertices inserted into the edges c(j)x(j)i, c(j)c(j+1) and x(j)ix(j+1)i respectively. Clearly r-subdivided stacked book graph SB(p,q)(r) admits C4(r+1)-covering.

    Let Ci,j4(r+1) be the (i,j)th-cycle for 1ip,1jq1 in SB(p,q)(r). Each (i,j)th-cycle Ci,j4(r+1) in SB(p,q)(r) has the vertex set

    {c(j),c(j+1),x(j)i,x(j+1)i},rk=1{u(i,j)k,u(i,j+1)k,ϵ(j)k,δ(i,j)k}

    and the edge set {u(i,j)ku(i,j)k+1,u(i,j+1)ku(i,j+1)k+1,ϵ(j)kϵ(j)k+1,δ(i,j)kδ(i,j)k+1:1kr1}

    {c(j)u(i,j)1,c(j+1)u(i,j+1)1,x(j)iu(i,j)r,x(j+1)iu(i,j+1)r,c(j)ϵ(j)1,c(j+1)ϵ(j)r,x(j)iδ(i,j)1,x(j+1)iδ(i,j)r}

    Ci,j4(r+1)-weight under a total labeling ϕ would be:

    wtϕ(Ci,j4(r+1))=vV(Ci,j4(r+1))ϕ(v)+eE(Ci,j4(r+1))ϕ(e).=j+1s=j(ϕ(c(s))+ϕ(x(s)i))+rs=1(j+1t=j(ϕ(u(i,t)s))+ϕ(ϵ(j)s)+ϕ(δ(i,j)s))++j+1s=j(ϕ(c(s)u(i,s)1)+ϕ(x(s)iu(i,s)r))+ϕ(c(j)ϵ(j)1)+ϕ(c(j+1)ϵ(j)r)+ϕ(x(j)iδ(i,j)1)++ϕ(x(j+1)iδ(i,j)r)+r1k=1(ϕ(ϵ(j)kϵ(j)k+1)+ϕ(δ(i,j)kδ(i,j)k+1))+j+1s=j(r1k=1ϕ(u(i,s)ku(i,s)k+1))=Partial1+2Partial2+Partial3 (3.1)

    where

    Partial1=ϕ(c(j)ϵ(j)1)+ϕ(c(j+1)ϵ(j)r)+j+1s=jϕ(c(s))+rk=1ϕ(ϵ(j)k)+r1k=1ϕ(ϵ(j)kϵ(j)k+1) (3.2)
    Partial2=ϕ(x(j)i)+ϕ(x(j)iu(i,j)r)+ϕ(c(j)u(i,j)1)+rk=1ϕ(u(i,j)k)+r1k=1ϕ(u(i,j)ku(i,j)k+1) (3.3)
    Partial3=ϕ(x(j)iδ(i,j)1)+ϕ(x(j+1)iδ(i,j)r)+rk=1ϕ(δ(i,j)k)+r1k=1ϕ(δ(i,j)kδ(i,j)k+1)+ (3.4)

    Theorem 2. Let p,q3 and r1 be positive integers and SB(p,q)(r) be r-subdivided stacked book graph then SB(p,q)(r) admits a super (β,1)-C4(r+1)-antimagic labeling.

    Proof. The total labeling ϕ have the form:

    ϕ(c(j))={q2+j2       j0   (mod2)j+12       j1   (mod2)
    ϕ(x(j)i)=j+iqif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,qϕ(ϵ(j)k)=pq+k(q1)+1+jif  j=¯1,q1, k=¯1,rϕ(δ(i,j)k)=p+(q1)(pk+r+i)+1+jif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,q1, k=¯1,rϕ(u(i,j)k)=r(p+1)(q1)+q(pk+i)+jif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,q, k=¯1,rϕ(c(j)u(i,j)1)=r(p+1)(q1)+q(p(r+2)+2i)+1jif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,qϕ(x(j)iu(i,j)r)=r(p+1)(q1)+q(p(r+3)+2i)+1jif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,qϕ(u(i,j)ku(i,j)k+1)=r(p+1)(q1)+q(p(2r+3k)+2i)+1jif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,q, k=¯1,r1ϕ(c(j)ϵ(j)1)=r(p+1)(q1)+2q(p(r+1)+1)jif  j=¯1,q1ϕ(c(j+1)ϵ(j)r)=r(p+1)(q1)+q(2p(r+1)+3)(1+j)if  j=¯1,q1ϕ(ϵ(j)kϵ(j)k+1)=p(3qr+2qr)(q1)(k2r)+3q1jif  j=¯1,q1, k=¯1,r1ϕ(x(j)iδ(i,j)1)=(q1)[r(p+2)+i]+2pq(r+1)+q+jif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,q1ϕ(x(j+1)iδ(i,j)r)=(q1)[r(p+2)+2p+1i]+2pq(r+1)+2qjif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,q1ϕ(δ(i,j)kδ(i,j)k+1)=(q1)[2(pr+p+r)+1ipk]+2q[pr+p+1]jif  i=¯1,p, j=¯1,q1, k=¯1,r1

    Using expressions (3.2), (3.3) and (3.4), we have:

    Partial1=q2+j+1+r[pq+(r+1)(q1)2+1+j]++2r(p+1)(q1)+4pq(r+1)+5q12j+(r1)[p(3qr+2qr)+2r(q1)+3q1jr(q1)2]=q2+1+pqr(4+3r)+p(1+r)(2qr)+r(2r+1)(q1)+q(3r+2) (3.5)
    Partial2=iq+j+2r(p+1)(q1)+pq(2r+5)+2q(2i)+22j++r[r(p+1)(q1)+qi+j+pq(r+1)2]+(r1)[r(p+1)(q1)+pq(2r+3)+q(2i)+1jpqr2]=r(p+1)(q1)(1+2r)+(1+r)[2pq(1+r)+1+2q]+1 (3.6)
    Partial3=p+(q1)(r+i)+1+j+pr(q1)(r+1)2pr(q1)(r1)2+(q1)[2r(p+2)+2p+1]+4pq(r+1)+3q(r1)j(r1)(q1)[2pr+2p+2r+1i]+2q(r1)[pr+p+1]=r(r+1)(q1)(2p+3)+q(2pr2+5pr+2p+2r+1)+r+i(q1)+j=SPartial3+i(q1)+j (3.7)

    where SPartial3=r(r+1)(q1)(2p+3)+q(2pr2+5pr+2p+2r+1)+r

    wtϕ(Ci,j4(r+1))=Partial1+2Partial2+Partial3=Partial1+2Partial2+SPartial3+i(q1)+j (3.8)

    One can observe here that the Partial1+2Partial2+SPartial3 are independent of i and j. Equation (3.8) clearly shows that wtϕ(Ci,j4(r+1)) only depends on i and j. Equation (3.8) with equation (2.4) proves that SB(p,q)(r) admits a super (β,1)-C4(r+1)-antimagic labeling which completes the proof.

    In this manuscript, we prove results related to super (α,1)-C4-antimagic labeling of stacked book graphs SB(p,q) and super (α,1)-C4(r+1)-antimagic labeling of its r subdivided graph SB(p,q)(r). One can extend these results for other differences d and for disjoint union of stacked book graphs. One can also prove results about applications of graph labeling in data science and communication networks.

    The study was supported by the Key Industrial Technology Development Project of Chongqing Development and Reform Commission, China (Grant No. 2018148208), Key Technological Innovation and Application Development Project of Chongqing, China (Grant No. cstc2019jscx-fxydX0094), Innovation and Entrepreneurship Demonstration Team of Yingcai Program of Chongqing, China (Grant No. CQYC201903167), Science and Technology Innovation Project of Yongchuan District (Ycstc,2020cc0501).

    The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11971142, 11871202, 61673169, 11701176, 11626101, 11601485).

    The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers of this journal who helped to improve the paper.

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.



    [1] Koch-Rose M, Mitsova-Boneva D, Root T (2011) Florida Water Management and Adaptation in the Face of Climate Change. A White Paper on Climate Change and Florida's Water Resources. 1–68.
    [2] Kumar Singh C, Jha N, Eslamian S (2015) Reuse, Potable Water, and Possibilities, in Urban Water Reuse Handbook, Ch. 9, Ed. By Eslamian S, Taylor and Francis, CRC Group, USA, 113–126.
    [3] Amiri MJ, Eslamian S, Arshadi M, et al. (2015) Water Recycling and Community, Urban Water Reuse Handbook, Ch. 22, Ed. By Eslamian, S., Taylor and Francis, CRC Group, USA, 261–274.
    [4] Archer J, Luffman I, Joyner TA, et al. (2018) Identifying untapped potential: a geospatial analysis of Florida and California's 2009 recycled water production. J Water Reuse Desal.
    [5] National Research Council. (2012) Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nations Water Supply through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater. Washington DC: National Academies Press. 1–277.
    [6] Angelakis A, Gikas P. (2014) Water reuse: Overview of current practices and trends in the world with emphasis on EU states. Water Utility J 8: 67–78.
    [7] De Feo G, Antoniou G, Fardin H, et al. (2014) The historical development of sewers worldwide. Sustainability (Switzerland) 6: 3936–3974. doi: 10.3390/su6063936
    [8] Newton D, Balgobin D, Badyal D, et al. (2011) Results, Challenges, and Future Approaches to California's Municipal Wastewater Recycling Survey. State Water Resources Control Board of California. 1–12.
    [9] Toor G, Rainey D (2009) History and Current Status of Reclaimed Water Use in Florida. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. 1–5.
    [10] Florida Department of Environmental Protection. (2016) Reuse Inventory Database and Annual Report. 2015 Reuse Inventory. State of Florida.
    [11] Po M, Kaercher J, Nancarrow B (2003) Literature Review of Factors Influencing Public Perceptions of Water Reuse. CSIRO Land and Water. Technical Report. 54/03(December):1–44.
    [12] Dolnicar S, Saunders C (2006) Recycled water for consumer markets - a marketing research review and agenda. Desalination 187: 203–214. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.080
    [13] Dolnicar S, Schäfer A (2009) Desalinated versus recycled water: Public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. J Environ Manage 9: 888–900.
    [14] Crampton A, Ragusa A (2016) Exploring Perceptions and Behaviors about Drinking Water in Australia and New Zealand: Is It Risky to Drink Water, When and Why? Hydrology, 3: 8.
    [15] Qian N, Leong C (2016) A game theoretic approach to implementation of recycled drinking water. Desalin Water Treat 3994: 1–9.
    [16] Wang PF, Martin J, Morrison G (1999) Water Quality and Eutrophication in Tampa Bay, Florida. Estuar Coast Shelf S 49: 1–20.
    [17] Bixio D, De Heyder B, Cikurel H, et al. (2005) Municipal wastewater reclamation: where do we stand? An overview of treatment technology and management practice. Water Sci Technol-W Sup 5: 77–86.
    [18] Wintgens T, Melin T, Schäfer A, et al. (2005) The role of membrane processes in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse. Desalination 178: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.12.014
    [19] Paterson W, Rushforth R, Ruddell B, et al. (2015) Water footprint of cities: A review and suggestions for future research. Sustainability 7: 8461–8490. doi: 10.3390/su7078461
    [20] Rice J, Westerhoff P (2015) Spatial and Temporal Variation in De Facto Wastewater Reuse in Drinking Water Systems across the U.S.A. Environ Sci Technol 49: 982–989. doi: 10.1021/es5048057
    [21] Luo W, Hai F, Price W, et al. (2016) Evaluating ionic organic draw solutes in osmotic membrane bioreactors for water reuse. J Membrane Sci 514: 636–645. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.023
    [22] Kuwayama Y, Kamen H (2016) What Drives the Reuse of Municipal Wastewater? A County-Level Analysis of Florida. Land Econ 92: 679–702.
    [23] Waste Treatment and Disinfection. § 62.610.460, 2006.
    [24] Montagna P, Alber M, Doering P, et al. (2002) Freshwater Inflow: Science, Policy, Management. Estuaries 25: 1243–1245. doi: 10.1007/BF02692221
    [25] Maupin M, Kenny J, Hutson S, et al. (2014) Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2010: USGS Circular 1405: 64.
    [26] Bryck J, Prasad R, Lindley T, et al. (2008) National Database of Water Reuse Facilities Summary Report. WaterReuse Foundation, 1–121.
    [27] Olexa M, Minton L, Miller D, et al. (2002) Handbook of Florida Water Regulation: Water Management Districts. IFAS Extension, 1–3.
    [28] United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water (2008) Clean Water Needs Survey. Microsoft Access database. Accessed on 5 Sept. 2015. Available from https://www.epa.gov/cwns%20.
    [29] United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water (2012) Clean Water Needs Survey. Microsoft Access database. Accessed on 5 Sept. 2015. Available from https://www.epa.gov/cwns%20.
    [30] Florida Department of Environmental Protection (2010) Reuse Inventory Database and Annual Report. 2009 Reuse Inventory. Tallahassee.
    [31] Environmental Systems Research Institute (2016) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.4.1. Redlands, CA.
    [32] IBM Corp (Released 2014) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
    [33] Levine N (2015) CrimeStat: A Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Incident Locations (v 4.02). Ned Levine & Associates, Houston, Texas, and the National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C. 1–219.
    [34] United States Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Office of Wastewater Management. Guidelines for Water Reuse. EPA/625/R-04/108, 1–643. Available from https://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100FS7K.pdf.
    [35] Florida Department of Environmental Protection (2009) Connecting Reuse and Water Use: A Report of the Reuse Stakeholders Meetings. 1–11.
    [36] Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Office of Water Policy. (2015) Report on Expansion of Beneficial Use of Reclaimed Water, Stormwater and Excess Surface Water. Senate Bill 536, 1–230.
    [37] Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (2007) Reuse Feasibility Study (Section 7) Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations. Miami-Dade County. 7.1–7.8.
    [38] MWH (2009) Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Rehydration Pilot Project. Technical Memorandum #2 Miami-Dade County. 1–40.
    [39] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2017) National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress, EPA 841-R-16-011.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Hafiz Usman Afzal, Ahmed Alamer, Muhammad Javaid, Computing Antimagic Labeling of Lattically Designed Symmetric Networks, 2022, 10, 2169-3536, 32394, 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160715
    2. Nur Inayah, Faisal Susanto, Andrea Semaničová-Feňovčíková, On H-antimagic coverings for m-shadow and closed m-shadow of connected graphs, 2021, 7, 24058440, e08203, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08203
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4915) PDF downloads(776) Cited by(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog