Research article

Explicit formulas for the p-adic valuations of Fibonomial coefficients II

  • In this article, we give explicit formulas for the p-adic valuations of the Fibonomial coefficients (pann)F for all primes p and positive integers a and n. This is a continuation from our previous article extending some results in the literature, which deal only with p=2,3,5,7 and a=1. Then we use these formulas to characterize the positive integers n such that (pnn)F is divisible by p, where p is any prime which is congruent to ±2(mod5).

    Citation: Phakhinkon Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam. Explicit formulas for the p-adic valuations of Fibonomial coefficients II[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5685-5699. doi: 10.3934/math.2020364

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yulu Feng, Min Qiu . Some results on p-adic valuations of Stirling numbers of the second kind. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4168-4196. doi: 10.3934/math.2020267
    [2] Phakhinkon Napp Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam . Divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients in terms of their digital representations and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5314-5327. doi: 10.3934/math.2022296
    [3] Babar Sultan, Mehvish Sultan, Aziz Khan, Thabet Abdeljawad . Boundedness of an intrinsic square function on grand $ p $-adic Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26484-26497. doi: 10.3934/math.20231352
    [4] Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Qasim Ali Malik . Some new characterizations of boundedness of commutators of $p$-adic maximal-type functions on $p$-adic Morrey spaces in terms of Lipschitz spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19756-19770. doi: 10.3934/math.2024964
    [5] Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam . Some weighted estimates for the commutators of $p$-adic Hardy operator on two weighted $p$-adic Herz-type spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9633-9646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021561
    [6] Pham Thi Kim Thuy, Kieu Huu Dung . Hardy–Littlewood maximal operators and Hausdorff operators on $ p $-adic block spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 23060-23087. doi: 10.3934/math.20241121
    [7] Yanlong Shi, Xiangxing Tao . Rough fractional integral and its multilinear commutators on $ p $-adic generalized Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17012-17026. doi: 10.3934/math.2023868
    [8] Qianjun He, Xiang Li . Necessary and sufficient conditions for boundedness of commutators of maximal function on the $ p $-adic vector spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14064-14085. doi: 10.3934/math.2023719
    [9] Phakhinkon Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam . Extremal orders and races between palindromes in different bases. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2237-2254. doi: 10.3934/math.2022127
    [10] Ziyu Dong, Zhengjun Zhao . An application of $ p $-adic Baker method to a special case of Jeśmanowicz' conjecture. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11617-11628. doi: 10.3934/math.2023588
  • In this article, we give explicit formulas for the p-adic valuations of the Fibonomial coefficients (pann)F for all primes p and positive integers a and n. This is a continuation from our previous article extending some results in the literature, which deal only with p=2,3,5,7 and a=1. Then we use these formulas to characterize the positive integers n such that (pnn)F is divisible by p, where p is any prime which is congruent to ±2(mod5).


    The Fibonacci sequence (Fn)n1 is given by the recurrence relation Fn=Fn1+Fn2 for n3 with the initial values F1=F2=1. For each m1 and 1km, the Fibonomial coefficients (mk)F is defined by

    (mk)F=F1F2F3Fm(F1F2F3Fk)(F1F2F3Fmk)=Fmk+1Fmk+2FmF1F2F3Fk.

    Similar to the binomial coefficients, we define (mk)F=1 if k=0 and (mk)F=0 if k>m, and it is well-known that (mk)F is always an integer for every m1 and k0.

    Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the study of Fibonomial coefficients. Marques and Trojovský [25,26] start the investigation on the divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients by determining the integers n1 such that (pnn)F is divisible by p for p=2,3. Marques, Sellers, and Trojovský [24] show that p divides (pa+1pa)F for p±2(mod5) and a1. Marques and Trojovsk' [27] and Trojovský [42] extend their results further and obtained the p-adic valuation of (pa+1pa)F in [42]. Then Ballot [2,Theorem 2] generalizes the Kummer-like theorem of Knuth and Wilf [22] and uses it to give a generalization of Marques and Trojovský's results. In particular, Ballot [2,Theorems 3.6,5.2,and 5.3] finds all integers n such that p(pnn)U for any nondegenerate fundamental Lucas sequence U and p=2,3 and for p=5,7 in the case U=F. Phunphayap and Pongsriiam [31] provide the most general formula for the p-adic valuation of Fibonomial coefficients in the most general form (mn)F. For other recent results on the divisibility properties of the Fibonacci numbers, the Fibonomial coefficients, and other combinatorial numbers, see for example [3,4,5,11,12,13,16,17,28,30,32,33,34,37,38,41,43]. For some identities involving Fibonomial coefficients and generalizations, we refer the reader to the work of Kilic and his coauthors [7,8,18,19,20,21]. For the p-adic valuations of Eulerian, Bernoulli, and Stirling numbers, see [6,9,14,23,40]. Hence the relation p(pann)F has been studied only in the case p=2,3,5,7 and a=1.

    In this article, we extend the investigation on (pann)F to the case of any prime p and any positive integer a. Replacing n by pa and pa by p, this becomes Marques and Trojovský's results [27,42]. Substituting a=1, p{2,3,5,7}, and letting n be arbitrary, this reduces to Ballot's theorems [2]. So our results are indeed an extension of those previously mentioned. To obtain such the general result for all p and a, the calculation is inevitably long but we try to make it as simple as possible. As a reward, we can easily show in Corollaries 3.3 and 3.4 that (4nn)F is odd if and only if n is a nonnegative power of 2, and (8nn)F is odd if and only if n=(1+32k)/7 for some k1(mod3).

    We organize this article as follows. In Section 2, we give some preliminaries and results which are needed in the proof of the main theorems. In Section 3, we calculate the p-adic valuation of (pann)F for all a, p, and n, and use it to give a characterization of the positive integers n such that (pann)F is divisible by p where p is any prime which is congruent to ±2(mod5). Remark that there also is an interesting pattern in the p-adic representation of the integers n such that (pnn)F is divisible by p. The proof is being prepared but it is a bit too long to include in this paper. We are trying to make it simpler and shorter and will publish it in the future. For more information and some recent articles related to the Fibonacci numbers, we refer the readers to [15,35,36,39] and references therein.

    Throughout this article, unless stated otherwise, x is a real number, p is a prime, a,b,k,m,n,q are integers, m,n1, and q2. The p-adic valuation (or p-adic order) of n, denoted by νp(n), is the exponent of p in the prime factorization of n. In addition, the order (or the rank) of appearance of n in the Fibonacci sequence, denoted by z(n), is the smallest positive integer m such that nFm, x is the largest integer less than or equal to x, {x} is the fractional part of x given by {x}=xx, x is the smallest integer larger than or equal to x, and amodm is the least nonnegative residue of a modulo m. Furthermore, for a mathematical statement P, the Iverson notation [P] is defined by

    [P]={1,if P holds;0,otherwise.

    We define sq(n) to be the sum of digits of n when n is written in base q, that is, if n=(akak1a0)q=akqk+ak1qk1++a0 where 0ai<q for every i, then sq(n)=ak+ak1++a0. Next, we recall some well-known and useful results for the reader's convenience.

    Lemma 1. Let p5 be a prime. Then the following statements hold.

    (i) nFm if and only if z(n)m

    (ii) z(p)p+1 if and only if p±2(mod5) and z(p)p1, otherwise.

    (iii) gcd(z(p),p)=1.

    Proof. These are well-known. See, for example, in [31,Lemma 1] for more details.

    Lemma 2. (Legendre's formula) Let n be a positive integer and let p be a prime. Then

    νp(n!)=k=1npk=nsp(n)p1.

    We will deal with a lot of calculations involving the floor function. So we recall the following results, which will be used throughout this article, sometimes without reference.

    Lemma 3. For kZ and xR, the following holds

    (i) k+x=k+x,

    (ii) {k+x}={x},

    (iii) x+x={1,if xZ0,if xZ

    (iv) 0{x}<1 and {x}=0 if and only if xZ.

    (v) x+y={x+y,if {x}+{y}<1x+y+1,if {x}+{y}1

    (vi) xk=xk for k1.

    Proof. These are well-known and can be proved easily. For more details, see in [10,Chapter 3]. We also refer the reader to [1,29] for a nice application of these properties.

    The next three theorems given by Phunphayap and Pongsriiam [31] are important tools for obtaining the main results of this article.

    Theorem 4. [31,Theorem 7] Let p be a prime, a0, 0, and m1. Assume that p±1(modm) and δ=[0(modm)] is the Iverson notation. Then

    νp(pam!)={(pa1)m(p1)a{m}+νp(m!),if p1(modm);(pa1)m(p1)a2δ+νp(m!),if p1(modm) and a is even;(pa1)m(p1)a12δ{m}+νp(m!),if p1(modm) and a is odd.

    Theorem 5. [31,Theorem 11 and Corollary 12] Let 0km be integers. Then the following statements hold.

    (i) Let A2=ν2(m6!)ν2(k6!)ν2(mk6!). If r=mmod6 and s=kmod6, then

    ν2((mk)F)={A2,if rs and (r,s)(3,1),(3,2),(4,2);A2+1,if (r,s)=(3,1),(3,2),(4,2);A2+3,if r<s and (r,s)(0,3),(1,3),(2,3)(1,4),(2,4),(2,5);A2+2,if (r,s)=(0,3),(1,3),(2,3),(1,4),(2,4)(2,5).

    (ii) ν5((mk)F)=ν5((mk)).

    (iii) Suppose that p is a prime, p2, and p5. If m=mz(p), k=kz(p), r=mmodz(p), and s=kmodz(p), then

    νp((mk)F)=νp((mk))+[r<s](νp(mk+z(p)z(p))+νp(Fz(p))).

    Theorem 6. [31,Theorem 13] Let a, b, 1, and 2 be positive integers and ba. For each p5, assume that 1pb>2pa and let mp=1pbaz(p) and kp=2z(p). Then the following statements hold.

    (i) If ab(mod2), then ν2((12b22a)F) is equal to

    {ν2((m2k2)),if 12(mod3) or 20(mod3);a+2+ν2(m2k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if 10(mod3) and 20(mod3);a2+1+ν2(m2k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if 11(mod3) and 22(mod3);a+12+ν2((m2k2)),if 12(mod3) and 21(mod3)

    and if ab(mod2), then ν2((12b22a)F) is equal to

    {ν2((m2k2)),if 12(mod3) or 20(mod3);a+2+ν2(m2k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if 10(mod3) and 20(mod3);a+12+ν2((m2k2)),if 11(mod3) and 21(mod3);a2+1+ν2(m2k2)+ν2((m2k2)),if 12(mod3) and 22(mod3).

    (ii) Let p5 be an odd prime and let r=1pbmodz(p) and s=2pamodz(p). If p±1(mod5), then

    νp((1pb2pa)F)=[r<s](a+νp(mpkp)+νp(Fz(p)))+νp((mpkp)),

    and if p±2(mod5), then νp((1pb2pa)F) is equal to

    {νp((mpkp)),if r=s or 20(modz(p));a+νp(Fz(p))+νp(mpkp)+νp((mpkp)),if 10(modz(p)) and20(modz(p));a2+νp((mpkp)),if r>s1,20(modz(p))and a is even;a2+νp(Fz(p))+νp(mpkp)+νp((mpkp)),if r<s1,20(modz(p))and a is even;a+12+νp(mpkp)+νp((mpkp)),if r>s1,20(modz(p))and a is odd;a12+νp(Fz(p))+νp((mpkp)),if r<s1,20(modz(p))and a is odd.

    In fact, Phunphayap and Pongsriiam [31] obtain other results analogous to Theorems 2.5 and 2.6 too but we do not need them in this article.

    We begin with the calculation of the 2-adic valuation of (2ann)F and then use it to determine the integers n such that (2nn)F,(4nn)F,(8nn)F are even. Then we calculate the p-adic valuation of (pann)F for all odd primes p. For binomial coefficients, we know that ν2((2nn))=s2(n). For Fibonomial coefficients, we have the following result.

    Theorem 7. Let a and n be positive integers, ε=[n0(mod3)], and A=(2a1)n32ν2(n). Then the following statements hold.

    (i) If a is even, then

    ν2((2ann)F)=δ+Aa2εν2(A!)=δ+s2(A)a2ε, (3.1)

    where δ=[nmod6=3,5]. In other words, δ=1 if n3,5(mod6) and δ=0 otherwise.

    (ii) If a is odd, then

    ν2((2ann)F)=δ+Aa12εν2(A!)=δ+s2(A)a12ε, (3.2)

    where δ=(nmod6)12[2n]+ν2(n)+3nmod32[nmod6=2,4]. In other words, δ=(nmod6)12 if n is odd, δ=0 if n0(mod6), δ=ν2(n)2+1 if n4(mod6), and δ=ν2(n)+12 if n2(mod6).

    Proof. The second equalities in (3.1) and (3.2) follow from Legendre's formula. So it remains to prove the first equalities in (3.1) and (3.2). To prove (ⅰ), we suppose that a is even and divide the consideration into two cases.

    Case 1. 2n. Let r=2anmod6 and s=nmod6. Then s{1,3,5}, r2an4n4s(mod6), and therefore (r,s)=(4,1),(0,3),(2,5). In addition, A=(2a1)n3=(2a1)n3 and δ=[s=3,5]. By Theorem 5(ⅰ), the left–hand side of (3.1) is A2 if s=1 and A2+2 if s=3,5, where A2=ν2(2an6!)ν2(n6!)ν2((2a1)n6!). We obtain by Theorem 4 that

    ν2(2an6!)=ν2(2a1n3!)=(2a11)n3a22ε{n3}+ν2(n3!).

    By Legendre's formula and Lemma 3, we have

    ν2(n6!)=ν2(n3!)n6,
    ν2((2a1)n6!)=ν2((2a1)n3!)(2a1)n6=ν2(A!)(2a1)n6,
    n6+(2a1)n6=ns6+2anr6ns6+rs6=2anr6[s{3,5}].

    From the above observation, we obtain

    A2=(2a11)n3a22ε{n3}+2anr6[s{3,5}]ν2(A!)=Aa22ε{n3}r6[s{3,5}]ν2(A!)={Aa2ν2(A!),if s=1;Aν2(A!)1,if s=3;Aa2ν2(A!)1,if s=5.

    It is now easy to check that A2 (if s=1), A2+2 (if s=3,5) are the same as δ+Aa2εν2(A!) in (3.1). So (3.1) is verified.

    Case 2. 2n. We write n=2b where 2 and let m=2a3, k=3, r=2amod3, and s=mod3. Since a is even, r=s. Then we apply Theorem 6(ⅰ) to obtain

    ν2((2ann)F)=ν2((2a+b2b)F)=ν2((mk))=ν2(m!)ν2(k!)ν2((mk)!). (3.3)

    We see that 0(mod3) if and only if n0(mod3). In addition, A=(2a1)3 and δ=0. By Theorem 4, we have

    ν2(m!)=Aa2ε+ν2(k!).

    In addition,

    mk=2a33=2ar3s3=2a3=A.

    So ν2((mk)!)=ν2(A!). Substituting these in (3.3), we obtain (3.1). This completes the proof of (ⅰ).

    To prove (ⅱ), we suppose that a is odd and divide the proof into two cases.

    Case 1. 2n. This case is similar to Case 1 of the previous part. So we let r=2anmod6 and s=nmod6. Then s{1,3,5}, r2an2n2s(mod6), (r,s)=(2,1),(0,3),(4,5), δ=s12, and the left–hand side of (3.2) is A2 if s=1, A2+2 if s=3, and A2+3 if s=5, where A2=ν2(2an6!)ν2(n6!)ν2((2a1)n6!). In addition, we have

    ν2(2an6!)=(2a11)n3a12ε+ν2(n3!),
    ν2(n6!)=ν2(n3!)n6,
    ν2((2a1)n6!)=ν2(A!)(2a1)n6,
    n6+(2a1)n6=2anr6[s{3,5}].

    Therefore

    A2=(2a11)n3a12ε+2anr6[s{3,5}]ν2(A!).

    Furthermore,

    A=(2a1)n3=2anr3ns3+rs3={(2a1)n313,if s=1;(2a1)n3,if s=3;(2a1)n323,if s=5

    which implies that A=(2a1)n3r6. Then

    A2=Aa12ε[s{3,5}]ν2(A!).

    It is now easy to check that A2 (if s=1), A2+2 (if s=3), and A2+3 (if s=5), are the same as δ+Aa12εν2(A!) in (3.2). So (3.2) is verified.

    Case 2. 2n. This case is similar to Case 2 of the previous part. So we write n=2b where 2 and let m=2a3, k=3, r=2amod3, and s=mod3. We obtain by Theorem 6 that ν2((2ann)F) is equal to

    ν2((2a+b2b)F)={ν2((mk)),if 0(mod3);b+12+ν2((mk)),if 1(mod3);b2+1+ν2(mk)+ν2((mk)),if 2(mod3). (3.4)

    By Theorem 4, we have

    ν2(m!)=(2a1)3a12ε{3}+ν2(k!).

    Since (2a1)(mod3), {(2a1)3}={3}. This implies that ν2(m!)=Aa12ε+ν2(k!). In addition, (r,s)=(0,0),(2,1),(1,2), and

    mk=2a33=2ar3s3=(2a1)(rs)3=A+[s=2].

    From the above observation, we obtain

    ν2((mk))=ν2(m!)ν2(k!)ν2((mk)!)={Aa12εν2(A!),if s=0,1;Aa12εν2((A+1)!),if s=2.

    Substituting this in (3.4), we see that

    ν2((2ann)F)={Aν2(A!),if 0(mod3);b+12+Aa12ν2(A!),if 1(mod3);b2+1+Aa12ν2(A!),if 2(mod3). (3.5)

    Recall that n=2b(1)b(mod3). So (3.5) implies that

    ν2((2ann)F)={Aν2(A!),if n0(mod3);b2+1+Aa12ν2(A!),if n1(mod3) and b is even;b+12+1+Aa12ν2(A!),if n1(mod3) and b is odd;b2+1+Aa12ν2(A!),if n2(mod3) and b is even;b+12+Aa12ν2(A!),if n2(mod3) and b is odd, 

    which is the same as (3.2). This completes the proof.

    We can obtain the main result of Maques and Trojovský [25] as a corollary.

    Corollary 8. (Marques and Trojovský [25]) (2nn)F is even for all n2.

    Proof. Let n2 and apply Theorem 7 with a=1 to obtain ν2((2nn)F)=δ+s2(A). If n0,1(mod6), then δ>0. If n0(mod6), then n32ν2(n), and so A1 and s2(A)>0. If n1(mod6), then A=n3>1 and so s2(A)>0. In any case, ν2((2nn)F)>0. So (2nn)F is even.

    Corollary 9. Let n2. Then (4nn)F is even if and only if n is not a power of 2. In other words, for each nN, (4nn)F is odd if and only if n=2k for some k0.

    Proof. Let δ, ε, and A be as in Theorem 7. If n=2k for some k1, then we apply Theorem 7 with a=2, δ=0, ε=1, A=1 leading to ν2((4nn)F)=0, which implies that (4nn)F is odd.

    Suppose n is not a power of 2. By Theorem 7, ν2((4nn)F)=δ+s2(A)εs2(A)1. Since n is not a power of 2, the sum s2(n)2. It is easy to see that s2(m)=s2(2cm) for any c,mN. Therefore s2(A)=s2(n2ν2(n))=s2(2ν2(n)n2ν2(n))=s2(n)2, which implies ν2((4nn)F)1, as required.

    Observe that 2,22,23 are congruent to 2,4,1(mod7), respectively. This implies that if k1 and k1(mod3), then (1+32k)/7 is an integer. We can determine the integers n such that (8nn)F is odd as follows.

    Corollary 10. (8nn)F is odd if and only if n=1+32k7 for some k1(mod3).

    Proof. Let a,δ,A,ε be as in Theorem 7. We first suppose n=(1+32k)/7 where k1 and k1(mod3). Then n7n1+32k1(mod6). Then a=3, ε=1, δ=0, A=2k, and so ν2((8nn)F)=0. Therefore (8nn)F is odd. Next, assume that (8nn)F is odd. Observe that A2 and s2(A)>0. If n0(mod3), then ε=0 and ν2((8nn)F)=δ+s2(A)>0, which is not the case. Therefore n1,2(mod3), and so ε=1. If n0(mod2), then δ=ν2(n)+3nmod321, and so ((8nn))Fs2(A)>0, which is a contradiction. So n1(mod2). This implies n1,5(mod6). But if n5(mod6), then δ2 and ν2((8nn)F)>0, a contradiction. Hence n1(mod6). Then δ=0. Since s2(A)1=ν2((8nn)F)=0, we see that A=2k for some k1. Then 7n13=7n3=A=2k, which implies n=1+32k7, as required.

    Theorem 11. For each a,nN, ν5((5ann)F)=ν5((5ann))=s5((5a1)n)4. In particular, (5ann)F is divisible by 5 for every a,nN.

    Proof. The first equality follows immediately from Theorem 5(ⅱ). By Legendre's formula, ν5((nk))=s5(k)+s5(nk)s5(n)4 for all nk1. So ν5((5ann)F) is

    s5(n)+s5(5ann)s5(5an)4=s5((5a1)n)4.

    Theorem 12. Let p2,5, a,nN, r=panmodz(p), s=nmodz(p), and A=n(pa1)pνp(n)z(p). Then the following statements hold.

    (i) If p±1(mod5), then νp((pann)F) is equal to

    Ap1a{npνp(n)z(p)}νp(A!)=sp(A)p1a{npνp(n)z(p)}. (3.6)

    (ii) If p±2(mod5) and a is even, then νp((pann)F) is equal to

    Ap1a2[s0]νp(A!)=sp(A)p1a2[s0]. (3.7)

    (iii) If p±2(mod5) and a is odd, then νp((pann)F) is equal to

    Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!)+δ, (3.8)

    where δ=(νp(n)2+[2νp(n)][r>s]+[r<s]νp(Fz(p)))[rs], or equivalently, δ=0 if r=s, δ=νp(n)2+νp(Fz(p)) if r<s, and δ=νp(n)2 if r>s.

    Proof. We first prove (ⅰ) and (ⅱ). So we suppose that the hypothesis of (ⅰ) or (ⅱ) is true. By writing νp(A!)=Asp(A)p1, we obtain the equalities in (3.6) and (3.7). By Lemma 1(ⅱ), pa1(modz(p)). Then r=s.

    Case 1. pn. Let m=panz(p) and k=nz(p). Then we obtain by Theorem 5(ⅲ) that

    νp((pann)F)=νp((mk))=νp(m!)νp(k!)νp((mk)!). (3.9)

    By Lemma 1(ⅱ) and Theorem 4, we see that if p±1(mod5), then p1(modz(p)) and

    νp(m!)=νp(npaz(p)!)=n(pa1)z(p)(p1)a{nz(p)}+νp(k!), (3.10)

    and if p±2(mod5) and a is even, then p1(modz(p)) and

    νp(m!)=n(pa1)z(p)(p1)a2[s0]+νp(k!). (3.11)

    Since z(p)pa1 and pn, A=n(pa1)z(p). Therefore

    mk=panz(p)nz(p)=panrz(p)nsz(p)=n(pa1)z(p)=A. (3.12)

    Substituting (3.10), (3.11), and (3.12) in (3.9), we obtain (3.6) and (3.7).

    Case 2. pn. Let n=pb where p, m=paz(p), and k=z(p). Since r=s, we obtain by Theorem 6 that νp((pann)F) is equal to

    νp((pa+bpb)F)=νp((mk))=νp(m!)νp(k!)νp((mk)!). (3.13)

    Since gcd(p,z(p))=1, we see that 0(modz(p))n0(modz(p))s=0. Similar to Case 1, we have νp(m!)=(pa1)z(p)(p1)a{z(p)}+νp(k!) if p±1(mod5), νp(m!)=(pa1)z(p)(p1)a2[s0]+νp(k!) if p±2(mod5) and a is even, pa(modz(p)), A=(pa1)z(p), and mk=A. So (3.13) leads to (3.6) and (3.7). This proves (ⅰ) and (ⅱ).

    To prove (ⅲ), suppose that p±2(mod5) and a is odd. By Lemma 1(ⅱ), p1(modz(p)). In addition, pa1p1=pa1+pa2++11(modz(p)). We divide the consideration into two cases.

    Case 1. pn. This case is similar to Case 1 of the previous part. So we apply Theorems 4 and 5(ⅲ). Let m=panz(p) and k=nz(p). Then

    νp(m!)=n(pa1)z(p)(p1)a12[s0]{nz(p)}+νp(k!),
    mk=panrz(p)nsz(p)=n(pa1)(rs)z(p),
    A=nparz(p)nsz(p)+rsz(p)=mk+rsz(p).

    Since pa1p11(modz(p)), n(pa1)p1n(modz(p)). This implies that {n(pa1)z(p)(p1)}={nz(p)}. Therefore

    νp(m!)=n(pa1)z(p)(p1)a12[s0]+νp(k!)=Ap1a12[s0]+νp(k!).

    From the above observation, if rs, then A=mk and

    νp((pann)F)=νp((mk))=Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!),

    which leads to (3.8). If r<s, then A=mk1, pann+z(p)z(p)=A+1, and νp((pann)F) is equal to

    Ap1a12[s0]νp((A+1)!)+νp(A+1)+νp(Fz(p))=Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!)+νp(Fz(p)),

    which is the same as (3.8).

    Case 2. pn. Let n=pb where p, m=paz(p), and k=z(p). Similar to Case 1, s=00(modz(p)). In addition, (pa1)p1(modz(p)), and so we obtain by Theorem 4 that νp(m!)=Ap1a12[s0]+νp(k!). The calculation of νp((pann)F)=νp((pa+bpb)F) is done by the applications of Theorem 6 and is divided into several cases. Suppose r=s. Then pa+bpanrsnpb(modz(p)). Since (p,z(p))=1, this implies pa(modz(p)). Therefore A=paz(p)=paz(p)=mk and

    νp((pann)F)=νp((mk))=νp(m!)νp(k!)νp((mk)!),

    which is (3.8). Obviously, if 0(modz(p)), then r=s, which is already done. So from this point on, we assume that rs and 0(modz(p)). Recall that p1(modz(p)) and a is odd. So if b is odd, then

    rnpanpb(modz(p)),  snpbpa(modz(p)),  and
    A=pasz(p)rz(p)+srz(p)=pasz(p)rz(p)+srz(p)=mk+srz(p).

    Similarly, if b is even, then r=pamodz(p), s=modz(p), and A=mk+rsz(p). Let R=Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!)+δ be the quantity in (3.8). From the above observation and the application of Theorem 6, we obtain νp((pann)F) as follows. If r>s and b is even, then A=mk and

    νp((pann)F)=b2+νp((mk))=b2+Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!)=R.

    If r>s and b is odd, then A=mk1 and

    νp((pann)F)=b+12+νp(A+1)+νp((mk))=b+12+Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!)=R.

    If r<s and b is even, then A=mk1 and

    νp((pann)F)=b2+νp(Fz(p))+νp(A+1)+νp((mk))=b2+νp(Fz(p))+Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!)=R.

    If r<s and b is odd, then A=mk and

    νp((pann)F)=b12+νp(Fz(p))+νp((mk))=b12+νp(Fz(p))+Ap1a12[s0]νp(A!)=R.

    This completes the proof.

    In the next two corollaries, we give some characterizations of the integers n such that (pann)F is divisible by p.

    Corollary 13. Let p be a prime and let a and n be positive integers. If n0(modz(p)), then p(pann)F.

    Proof. We first consider the case p2,5. Assume that n0(modz(p)) and r, s, A, and δ are as in Theorem 12. Then npνp(n)z(p),Ap1Z, r=s=0, and δ=0. Every case in Theorem 12 leads to νp((pann)F)=sp(A)p1>0, which implies p(pann)F. If p=5, then the result follows immediately from Theorem 11. If p=2, then every case of Theorem 7 leads to ν2((2ann)F)s2(A)>0, which implies the desired result.

    Corollary 14. Let p2,5 be a prime and let a, n, r, s, and A be as in Theorem 12. Assume that p±2(mod5) and n0(modz(p)). Then the following statements hold.

    (i) Assume that a is even. Then p(pann)F if and only if sp(A)>a2(p1).

    (ii) Assume that a is odd and pn. If r<s, then p(pann)F. If rs, then p(pann)F if and only if sp(A)a+12(p1).

    (iii) Assume that a is odd and pn. If rs, then p(pann)F. If r=s, then p(pann)F if and only if sp(A)a+12(p1).

    Proof. We use Lemmas 2 and 3 repeatedly without reference. For (ⅰ), we obtain by (3.7) that

    νp((pann)F)=sp(A)p1a2, which is positive if and only if sp(A)>a2(p1).

    This proves (ⅰ). To prove (ⅱ) and (ⅲ), we let δ be as in Theorem 12 and divide the consideration into two cases.

    Case 1. pn. If r<s, then we obtain by Theorem 5(ⅲ) that νp((pann)F)νp(Fz(p))1. Suppose rs. Then δ=0 and (3.8) is

    Ap1a12νp(A!)=Ap1a12Asp(A)p1=sp(A)p1{Ap1}a12.

    If sp(A)a+12(p1), then (3.8) implies that

    νp((pann)F)1{Ap1}>0.

    Similarly, if sp(A)<a+12(p1), then νp((pann)F)<1{Ap1}1. This proves (ⅱ).

    Case 2. pn. We write n=pb where p. Then b1. Recall that νp(Fz(p))1. If rs, then Theorem 6 implies that νp((pann))b2 if b is even and it is b+12 if b is odd. In any case, νp((pann)F)1. So p(pann)F. If r=s, then δ=0 and we obtain as in Case 1 that p(pann)F if and only if sp(A)a+12(p1). This proves (ⅲ).

    Corollary 15. Let p2,5 be a prime and let A=n(p1)pνp(n)z(p). Assume that p±1(mod5). Then p(pnn)F if and only if sp(A)p1.

    Proof. We remark that by Lemma 1(ⅱ), A is an integer. Let x=npνp(n)z(p). We apply Theorem 12(ⅰ) with a=1. If sp(A)p1, then (3.6) implies that νp((pnn)F)1{x}>0. If sp(A)<p1, then νp((pnn)F)<1{x}1. This completes the proof.

    We give exact formulas for the p-adic valuations of Fibonomial coefficients of the form (pann)F for all primes p and a,nN. Then we use it to characterize the integers n such that (pann)F is divisible by p.

    Phakhinkon Phunphayap receives a scholarship from Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand(SAST). This research was jointly supported by the Thailand Research Fund and the Faculty of Science Silpakorn University, grant number RSA5980040.

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.



    [1] S. Aursukaree, T. Khemaratchatakumthorn, P. Pongsriiam, Generalizations of Hermite's identity and applications, Fibonacci Quart., 57 (2019), 126-133.
    [2] C. Ballot, Divisibility of Fibonomials and Lucasnomials via a general Kummer rule, Fibonacci Quart., 53 (2015), 194-205.
    [3] C. Ballot, The congruence of Wolstenholme for generalized binomial coefficients related to Lucas sequences, J. Integer Seq., 18 (2015), Article 15.5.4.
    [4] C. Ballot, Lucasnomial Fuss-Catalan numbers and related divisibility questions, J. Integer Seq., 21 (2018), Article 18.6.5.
    [5] C. Ballot, Divisibility of the middle Lucasnomial coefficient, Fibonacci Quart., 55 (2017), 297-308.
    [6] F. N. Castro, O. E. González, L. A. Medina, The p-adic valuation of Eulerian numbers: Trees and Bernoulli numbers, Experiment. Math., 2 (2015), 183-195.
    [7] W. Chu, E. Kilic, Quadratic sums of Gaussian q-binomial coefficients and Fibonomial coefficients, Ramanujan J., 51 (2020), 229-243. doi: 10.1007/s11139-018-0023-x
    [8] W. Chu, E. Kilic, Cubic sums of q-binomial coefficients and the Fibonomial coefficients, Rocky Mountain J. Math., 49 (2019), 2557-2569. doi: 10.1216/RMJ-2019-49-8-2557
    [9] Y. L. Feng, M. Qiu. Some results on p-adic valuations of Stirling numbers of the second kind, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 4168-4196.
    [10] R. L. Graham, D. E. Knuth, O. Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, 1994.
    [11] V. J. W. Guo, Proof of a generalization of the (B.2) supercongruence of Van Hamme through a q-microscope, Adv. Appl. Math., 116 (2020), Art. 102016.
    [12] V. J. W. Guo, J. C. Liu, Some congruences related to a congruence of Van Hamme, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 31 (2020), 221-231. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2019.1685991
    [13] V. J. W. Guo, W. Zudilin, A common q-analogue of two supercongruences, Results Math., 75(2020), Art. 46.
    [14] S. F. Hong, M. Qiu, On the p-adic properties of Stirling numbers of the first kind, Acta Math. Hungar., 161 (2020), 366-395. doi: 10.1007/s10474-020-01037-2
    [15] M. Jaidee, P. Pongsriiam, Arithmetic functions of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, Fibonacci Quart., 57 (2019), 246-254.
    [16] N. Khaochim, P. Pongsriiam, The general case on the order of appearance of product of consecutive Lucas numbers, Acta Math. Univ. Comenian., 87 (2018), 277-289.
    [17] N. Khaochim, P. Pongsriiam, On the order of appearance of product of Fibonacci numbers, Contrib. Discrete Math., 13 (2018), 45-62.
    [18] E. Kilic, I. Akkus, On Fibonomial sums identities with special sign functions: Analytically q-calculus approach, Math. Slovaca, 68 (2018), 501-512. doi: 10.1515/ms-2017-0120
    [19] E. Kilic, I. Akkus, H. Ohtsuka, Some generalized Fibonomial sums related with the Gaussian q-binomial sums, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie, 55 (2012), 51-61.
    [20] E. Kilic, H. Prodinger, Closed form evaluation of sums containing squares of Fibonomial coefficients, Math. Slovaca, 66 (2016), 757-767.
    [21] E. Kilic, H. Prodinger, Evaluation of sums involving products of Gaussian q-binomial coefficients with applications, Math. Slovaca, 69 (2019), 327-338. doi: 10.1515/ms-2017-0226
    [22] D. Knuth, H. Wilf, The power of a prime that divides a generalized binomial coefficient, J. Reine Angew. Math., 396 (1989), 212-219.
    [23] T. Komatsu, P. Young, Exact p-adic valuations of Stirling numbers of the first kind, J. Number Theory, 177 (2017), 20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2017.01.023
    [24] D. Marques, J. A. Sellers, P. Trojovský, On divisibility properties of certain Fibonomial coefficients by a prime, Fibonacci Quart., 51 (2013), 78-83.
    [25] D. Marques, P. Trojovský, On parity of Fibonomial coefficients, to appear in Util. Math.
    [26] D. Marques, P. Trojovský, On divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients by 3, J. Integer Seq., 15 (2012), Article 12.6.4.
    [27] D. Marques, P. Trojovský, The p-adic order of some Fibonomial coefficients, J. Integer Seq., 18 (2015), Article 15.3.1
    [28] K. Onphaeng, P. Pongsriiam, Subsequences and divisibility by powers of the Fibonacci numbers, Fibonacci Quart., 52 (2014), 163-171.
    [29] K. Onphaeng, P. Pongsriiam, Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal-Lucas numbers and sums introduced by Jacobsthal and Tverberg, J. Integer Seq., 20 (2017), Article 17.3.6.
    [30] K. Onphaeng, P. Pongsriiam, The converse of exact divisibility by powers of the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, Fibonacci Quart., 56 (2018), 296-302.
    [31] P. Phunphayap, P. Pongsriiam, Explicit formulas for the p-adic valuations of Fibonomial coefficients, J. Integer Seq., 21 (2018), Article 18.3.1.
    [32] P. Pongsriiam, Exact divisibility by powers of the Fibonacci and Lucas number, J. Integer Seq., 17 (2014), Article 14.11.2.
    [33] P. Pongsriiam, A complete formula for the order of appearance of the powers of Lucas numbers, Commun. Korean Math. Soc., 31 (2016), 447-450. doi: 10.4134/CKMS.c150161
    [34] P. Pongsriiam, Factorization of Fibonacci numbers into products of Lucas numbers and related results, JP J. Algebra Number Theory Appl., 38 (2016), 363-372.
    [35] P. Pongsriiam, Fibonacci and Lucas numbers associated with Brocard-Ramanujan equation, Commun. Korean Math. Soc., 32 (2017), 511-522.
    [36] P. Pongsriiam, Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers which are one away from their products, Fibonacci Quart., 55 (2017), 29-40.
    [37] P. Pongsriiam, Fibonacci and Lucas numbers which have exactly three prime factors and some unique properties of F18 and L18, Fibonacci Quart., 57 (2019), 130-144.
    [38] P. Pongsriiam, The order of appearance of factorials in the Fibonacci sequence and certain Diophantine equations, Period. Math. Hungar., 79 (2019), 141-156. doi: 10.1007/s10998-018-0268-6
    [39] B. Prempreesuk, P. Noppakaew, P. Pongsriiam, Zeckendorf representation and multiplicative inverse of Fm mod Fn, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 15(2020), 17-25.
    [40] M. Qiu, S. F. Hong, 2-Adic valuations of Stirling numbers of the first kind, Int. J. Number Theory, 15 (2019), 1827-1855. doi: 10.1142/S1793042119501021
    [41] Z. W. Sun, Fibonacci numbers modulo cubes of prime, Taiwanese J. Math., 17 (2013), 1523-1543. doi: 10.11650/tjm.17.2013.2488
    [42] P. Trojovský, The p-adic order of some Fibonomial coefficients whose entries are powers of p, p-Adic Numbers Ultrametric Anal. Appl., 9 (2017), 228-235. doi: 10.1134/S2070046617030050
    [43] W. Zudilin, Congruences for q-binomial coefficients, Ann. Combin., 23 (2019), 1123-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00026-019-00461-8
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Kritkhajohn Onphaeng, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Exact divisibility by powers of the integers in the Lucas sequence of the first kind, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6739, 10.3934/math.2020433
    2. Phakhinkon Napp Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Jeffrey Shallit, Sumsets associated with Beatty sequences, 2022, 345, 0012365X, 112810, 10.1016/j.disc.2022.112810
    3. Phakhinkon Napp Phunphayap, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Divisibility of Fibonomial coefficients in terms of their digital representations and applications, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 5314, 10.3934/math.2022296
    4. Kritkhajohn Onphaeng, Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Exact divisibility by powers of the integers in the Lucas sequences of the first and second kinds, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 11733, 10.3934/math.2021682
    5. Christian J.-C. Ballot, Hugh C. Williams, 2023, Chapter 5, 978-3-031-37237-7, 105, 10.1007/978-3-031-37238-4_5
    6. Prapanpong Pongsriiam, Sums of divisors on arithmetic progressions, 2024, 88, 0031-5303, 443, 10.1007/s10998-023-00566-x
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3613) PDF downloads(236) Cited by(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog