Citation: Hsien-Chung Wu. Numerical method for solving the continuous-time linear programming problems with time-dependent matrices and piecewise continuous functions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5572-5627. doi: 10.3934/math.2020358
[1] | Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu . New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6874-6901. doi: 10.3934/math.2020441 |
[2] | Xinghua You, Ghulam Farid, Lakshmi Narayan Mishra, Kahkashan Mahreen, Saleem Ullah . Derivation of bounds of integral operators via convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4781-4792. doi: 10.3934/math.2020306 |
[3] | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Artion Kashuri, Hüseyin Budak . Generalizations of fractional Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer like inequalities for convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9397-9421. doi: 10.3934/math.2021546 |
[4] | Hengxiao Qi, Muhammad Yussouf, Sajid Mehmood, Yu-Ming Chu, Ghulam Farid . Fractional integral versions of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for generalized exponentially convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6030-6042. doi: 10.3934/math.2020386 |
[5] | Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani, Abdullahi Yusuf . The generalization of Hermite-Hadamard type Inequality with exp-convexity involving non-singular fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7040-7055. doi: 10.3934/math.2022392 |
[6] | Yousaf Khurshid, Muhammad Adil Khan, Yu-Ming Chu . Conformable integral version of Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér inequalities via η-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5106-5120. doi: 10.3934/math.2020328 |
[7] | Yue Wang, Ghulam Farid, Babar Khan Bangash, Weiwei Wang . Generalized inequalities for integral operators via several kinds of convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4624-4643. doi: 10.3934/math.2020297 |
[8] | Wenfeng He, Ghulam Farid, Kahkashan Mahreen, Moquddsa Zahra, Nana Chen . On an integral and consequent fractional integral operators via generalized convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7632-7648. doi: 10.3934/math.2020488 |
[9] | Mehmet Eyüp Kiriş, Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Gözde Bayrak, Tuğba Çınar, Hüseyin Budak . On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for co-ordinated convex function via conformable fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 10267-10288. doi: 10.3934/math.2024502 |
[10] | Maryam Saddiqa, Ghulam Farid, Saleem Ullah, Chahn Yong Jung, Soo Hak Shim . On Bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions for generalized exponentially convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6454-6468. doi: 10.3934/math.2021379 |
On different time ranges, fractional calculus has a great impact due to a diversity of applications that have contributed to several fields of technical sciences and engineering [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. One of the principal options behind the popularity of the area is that fractional-order differentiations and integrations are more beneficial tools in expressing real-world matters than the integer-order ones. Various studies in the literature, on distinct fractional operators such as the classical Riemann-Liouville, Caputo, Katugamploa, Hadamard, and Marchaud versions have shown versatility in modeling and control applications across various disciplines. However, such forms of fractional derivatives may not be able to explain the dynamic performance accurately, hence, many authors are found to be sorting out new fractional differentiations and integrations which have a kernel depending upon a function and this makes the range of definition expanded [13,14]. Furthermore, models based on these fractional operators provide excellent results to be compared with the integer-order differentiations [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
The derivatives in this calculus seemed complicated and lost some of the basic properties that usual derivatives have such as the product rule and the chain rule. However, the semigroup properties of these operators behave well in some cases. Recently, the authors in [28] defined a new well-behaved simple derivative called "conformable fractional derivative" which depends just on the basic limit definition of the derivative. It will define the derivative of higher-order (i.e., order δ>1) and also define the integral of order 0<δ≤1 only. It will also prove the product rule and the mean value theorem and solve some (conformable) differential equations where the fractional exponential function eϑδδ plays an important rule. Inequalities and their utilities assume a crucial job in the literature of pure and applied mathematics [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The assortment of distinct kinds of classical variants and their modifications were built up by using the classical fractional operators.
Convexity and its applications exist in almost every field of mathematics due to impermanence in several areas of science, technology in nonlinear programming and optimization theory. By utilizing the idea of convexity, numerous variants have been derived by researchers, for example, Hardy, Opial, Ostrowski, Jensen and the most distinguished one is the Hermite-Hadamard inequality [38,39,40,41].
Let I⊂R be an interval and Q:I→R be a convex function. Then the double inequality
(l2−l1)Q(l1+l22)≤l2∫l1Q(z)dz≤(l2−l1)Q(l1)+Q(l2)2, | (1.1) |
holds for all l1,l2∈I with l1≠l2. Clearly, if Q is concave on I, then one has the reverse of inequality (1.1). By taking into account fractional integral operators, several lower and upper bounds for the mean value of a convex function can be obtained by utilizing of inequality (1.1).
Exponentially convex functions have emerged as a significant new class of convex functions, which have potential applications in technology, data science, and statistics. In [42], Bernstein introduced the concept of exponentially convex function in covariance formation, then the idea of an exponentially convex function is extended by inserting the condition of r-convexity [43]. Following this tendency, Jakšetić and Pečarić introduced various kinds of exponentially convex functions in [44] and have contemplated the applications in Euler-Radau expansions and Stolarsky means. Our aim is to utilize the exponential convexity property of the functions as well as the absolute values of their derivatives in order to establish estimates for conformable fractional integral introduced by Abdeljawed [45] and Jarad et al. [46].
Following the above propensity, we present a novel technique for establishing new generalizations of Hermite-Hadamard inequalities that correlate with exponentially tgs-convex functions and conformable fractional operator techniques in this paper. The main purpose is that our consequences, which are more consistent and efficient, are accelerated via the fractional calculus technique. In addition, our consequences also taking into account the estimates for Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for exponentially tgs-convex functions. We also investigate the applications of the two proposed conformable fractional operator to exponentially tgs-convex functions and fractional calculus. The proposed numerical experiments show that our results are superior to some related results.
Before coming to the main results, we provide some significant definitions, theorems and properties of fractional calculus in order to establish a mathematically sound theory that will serve the purpose of the current article.
Awan et al. [47] proposed a new class of functions called exponentially convex functions.
Definition 2.1. (See [47]) A positive real-valued function Q:K⊂R→(0,∞) is said to be exponentially convex on K if the inequality
Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)≤ϑQ(l1)eαl1+(1−ϑ)Q(l2)eαl2, | (2.1) |
holds for all l1,l2∈R,α∈R and ϑ∈[0,1].
Now, we introduce a novel concept of convex function which is known as the exponentially tgs-convex function.
Definition 2.2. A positive real-valued function Q:K⊂R→(0,∞) is said to be exponentially tgs-convex on K if the inequality
Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)≤ϑ(1−ϑ)[Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2], | (2.2) |
holds for all l1,l2∈R,α∈R and ϑ∈[0,1].
The conformable fractional integral operator was introduced by Abdeljawad [45].
Definition 2.3. (See [45]) Let ρ∈(n,n+1] and δ=ρ−n. Then the left and right-sided conformable fractional integrals of order ρ>0 is defined by
Jρl+1Q(z)=1n!z∫l1(z−ϑ)n(ϑ−l1)ρ−1Q(ϑ)dϑ | (2.3) |
and
Jρl−2Q(z)=1n!l2∫z(ϑ−z)n(l2−ϑ)ρ−1Q(ϑ)dϑ. | (2.4) |
Next, we demonstrate the following fractional integral operator introduced by Jarad et al. [46].
Definition 2.4. (See [46]) Let δ∈C and ℜ(δ)>0. Then the left and right-sided fractional conformable integral operators of order ρ>0 are stated as:
Jρ,δl+1Q(z)=1Γ(δ)z∫l1((z−l1)ρ−(ϑ−l1)ρρ)δ−1Q(ϑ)(ϑ−l1)1−ρdϑ | (2.5) |
and
Jρ,δl−2Q(z)=1Γ(δ)z∫l1((l2−z)ρ−(l2−ϑ)ρρ)δ−1Q(ϑ)(l2−ϑ)1−ρdϑ. | (2.6) |
Recalling some special functions which are known as beta and incomplete beta function.
B(l1,l2)=1∫0ϑl1−1(1−ϑ)l2−1dϑ, |
Bv(l1,l2)=v∫0ϑl1−1(1−ϑ)l2−1dϑ,v∈[0,1]. |
Further, the following relationship holds between classical Beta and incomplete Beta functions:
B(l1,l2)=Bv(l1,l2)+B1−v(l1,l2), |
Bv(l1+1,l2)=l1Bv(l1,l2)−(12)l1+l2l1+l2 |
and
Bv(l1,l2+1)=l2Bv(l1,l2)−(12)l1+l2l1+l2. |
Throughout the article, let I=[l1,l2] be an interval in real line R. In this section, we shall demonstrate some integral versions of exponentially tgs-convex functions via conformable fractional integrals.
Theorem 3.1. For ρ∈(n,n+1]) with ρ>0 and let Q:I⊂R→R be an exponentially tgs-convex function such that Q∈L1([l1,l2]), then the following inequalities hold:
4Γ(ρ−n)Γ(ρ+1)Q(l1+l22) |
≤1(l2−l1)ρ[Jρl+1Q(l2)eαl2+Jρl−2Q(l1)eαl1] |
≤2(n+1)Γ(ρ−n+1)Γ(ρ+3)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2). | (3.1) |
Proof. By using exponentially tgs-convexity of Q, we have
Q(x+y2)≤14(Q(x)eαx+Q(y)eαy). | (3.2) |
Let x=ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2 and y=(1−ϑ)l1+ϑl2, we get
4Q(l1+l22)≤Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)eαQ(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)+Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)eα[(1−ϑ)l1+ϑl2]. | (3.3) |
If we multiply (3.3) by 1n!ϑn(1−ϑ)ρ−n−1 with ϑ∈(0,1),ρ>0 and then integrating the resulting estimate with respect to ϑ over [0,1], we find
4n!Q(l1+l22)∫10ϑn(1−ϑ)ρ−n−1dϑ |
≤1n!∫10ϑn(1−ϑ)ρ−n−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)eαQ(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
+1n!∫10ϑn(1−ϑ)ρ−n−1Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)eα[(1−ϑ)l1+ϑl2]dϑ |
=I1+I2 | (3.4) |
By setting u=ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2, we have
I1=1n!∫10ϑn(1−ϑ)ρ−n−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)eαQ(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=1n!(l2−l1)ρ∫l2l1(l2−1)n(u−l1)ρ−m−1Q(u)eαudu |
=1(l2−l1)ρJρl+1Q(l2)eαl2. | (3.5) |
Analogously, by setting v=ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1, we have
I2=1n!∫10ϑn(1−ϑ)ρ−n−1Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)dϑ |
=1n!(l2−l1)ρ∫l2l1(v−l1)n(l2−v)ρ−n−1Q(v)eαvdv |
=1(l2−l1)ρJρl−2Q(l1)eαl1. | (3.6) |
Thus by using (3.5) and (3.6) in (3.4), we get the first inequality of (3.1).
Consider
Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)≤ϑ(1−ϑ)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2) |
and
Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)≤ϑ(1−ϑ)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2). |
By adding
Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)+Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)≤2ϑ(1−ϑ)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2). | (3.7) |
If we multiply (3.7) by 1n!ϑn(1−ϑ)ρ−n−1 with ϑ∈(0,1),ρ>0 and then integrating the resulting inequality with respect to ϑ over [0,1], we get
1(l2−l1)ρ[Jρl+1Q(l2)eαl2+Jρl−2Q(l1)eαl1] |
≤2(n+1)Γ(ρ−n+1)Γ(ρ+3)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2), | (3.8) |
which is the required result.
Some special cases of above theorem are stated as follows:
Corollary 3.1. Choosing α=0, then Theorem 3.1 reduces to a new result
4Γ(ρ−n)Γ(ρ+1)Q(l1+l22) |
≤1(l2−l1)ρ[Jρl+1Q(l2)+Jρl−2Q(l1)] |
≤2(n+1)Γ(ρ−n+1)Γ(ρ+3)(Q(l1)+Q(l2)). |
Remark 3.1. Choosing ρ=n+1 and α=0, then Theorem 3.1 reduces to Theorem 3.1 in [19].
Our next result is the following lemma which plays a dominating role in proving our coming results.
Lemma 4.1. For ρ∈(n,n+1]) with ρ>0 and let Q:I⊂R→R be differentiable function on I∘(interior of I) with l1<l2 such that Q′∈L1([l1,l2]), then the following inequality holds:
B(n+1,ρ−n)(Q(l1)+Q(l2)2)−n!2(l2−l1)ρ[Jρl+1Q(l2)+Jρl−2Q(l1)] |
=∫10(B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)−Bu(n+1,ρ−n))Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ. | (4.1) |
Proof. It suffices that
∫10(B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)−Bu(n+1,ρ−n))Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=∫10B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
−∫10Bu(n+1,ρ−n)Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=S1−S2 | (4.2) |
Then by integration by parts, we have
S1=∫10B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=∫10(∫1−u0vn(1−v)ρ−n−1dv)Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=1l2−l1B(n+1,ρ−n)Q(l2) |
−1l2−l1∫10(1−u)nuρ−n−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=1l2−l1B(n+1,ρ−n)Q(l2) |
−1l2−l1∫l1l2(l1−zl1−l2)n(z−l2l1−l2)ρ−n−1Q(z)l1−l2dz |
=1l2−l1B(n+1,ρ−n)Q(l2)−n!(l2−l1)ρ+1Jρl−2Q(l1). | (4.3) |
Analogously
S2=∫10Bu(n+1,ρ−n)Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=∫10(∫u0vm(1−v)ρ−n−1dv)Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=−1l2−l1B(n+1,ρ−n)Q(l1) |
+1l2−l1∫10(u)n(1−u)ρ−n−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=−1l2−l1B(n+1,ρ−n)Q(l1) |
+1l2−l1∫l1l2(z−l2l1−l2)n(l1−zl1−l2)ρ−n−1Q(z)l1−l2dz |
=−1l2−l1B(n+1,ρ−n)Q(l1)−n!(l2−l1)ρ+1Jρl+1Q(l2). | (4.4) |
By substituting values of S1 and S2 in (4.2) and then If we multiply by l2−l12, we get (4.1).
For the sake of simplicity, we use the following notation:
ΥQ(ρ;B;n;l1,l2)=B(n+1,ρ−n)(Q(l1)+Q(l2)2)−n!2(l2−l1)ρ[Jρl+1Q(l2)+Jρl−2Q(l1)]. |
Theorem 4.2. For ρ∈(n,n+1]) with ρ>0 and let Q:I⊂R→R be a differentiable function on I∘ with l1<l2 such that Q′∈L1([l1,l2]). If | Q′|r, with r≥1, is an exponentially tgs-convex function, then the following inequality holds:
| ΥQ(ρ;B;n;l1,l2)|≤l2−l12(B(n+1,ρ−n+1)−B(n+1,ρ−n)+B(n+2,ρ−n))1−1r |
×(eαrl2|Q′(l1)|r+eαrl1|Q′(l2)|r6eαrl1eαrl2)1r. | (4.5) |
Proof. Utilizing exponentially tgs-convex function of | Q′|r, Lemma 4.1 and Hölder's inequality, one obtains
| ΥQ(ρ;B;n;l1,l2)| |
=| l2−l12∫10(B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)−Bu(n+1,ρ−n))Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ| |
≤l2−l12(∫10(B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)−Bu(n+1,ρ−n))dϑ)1−1r |
×(∫10| Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)|rdϑ)1r |
≤l2−l12(B(n+1,ρ−n+1)−B(n+1,ρ−n)+B(n+2,ρ−n))1−1r |
×(∫10ϑ(1−ϑ)(| Q′(l1)eαl1|r+| Q′(l2)eαl2|r)dϑ)1r |
≤l2−l12(B(n+1,ρ−n+1)−B(n+1,ρ−n)+B(n+2,ρ−n))1−1r |
×(eαrl2|Q′(l1)|r+eαrl1|Q′(l2)|r6eαrl1eαrl2)1r, | (4.6) |
which is the required result.
Theorem 4.3. For ρ∈(n,n+1] with ρ>0 and let Q:I⊂R→R be a differentiable function on I∘ with l1<l2 such that Q′∈L1([l1,l2]). If |Q′|r, with r,s>1 such that 1s+1r=1, is exponentially tgs-convex function, then the following inequality holds:
| ΥQ(ρ;B;n;l1,l2)|≤l2−l12(2∫120(∫1−uuvn(1−v)ρ−n−1dv)sdu)1s |
×(eαrl2|Q′(l1)|r+eαrl1|Q′(l2)|r6eαrl1eαrl2)1r. | (4.7) |
Proof. Utilizing exponentially tgs-convex function of | Q′|r and well-known Hölder inequality, one obtains
| ΥQ(ρ;B;n;l1,l2)| |
=| l2−l12∫10(B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)−Bu(n+1,ρ−n))Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ| |
≤l2−l12(∫10| B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)−Bn(n+1,ρ−n)|sdϑ)1s |
×(∫10| Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)|rdϑ)1r |
≤l2−l12(∫120(B1−u(n+1,ρ−n)−Bu(n+1,ρ−n))sdu |
+∫112(Bu(n+1,ρ−n)−B1−u(n+1,ρ−n))sdu)1s(∫10ϑ(1−ϑ)(| Q′(l1)|reαrl1+| Q′(l2)|qeαrl2)dϑ)1r |
=l2−l12(∫120(∫1−uuvn(1−v)ρ−n−1dv)sdv+∫112(∫u1−uvn(1−v)ρ−n−1dv)sdv)1s |
×(eαrl2|Q′(l1)|r+eαrl1|Q′(l2)|r6eαrl1eαrl2)1r |
=l2−l12(2∫120(∫1−uuvn(1−v)ρ−n−1dv)sdu)1s(eαrl2|Q′(l1)|r+eαrl1|Q′(l2)|r6eαrl1eαrl2)1r, | (4.8) |
which is the required result.
This section is devoted to proving some new generalizations for exponentially tgs-convex functions within the generalized conformable integral operator.
Theorem 5.1. For ρ>0 and let Q:[l1,l2]⊂R→R be an exponentially tgs-convex function such that Q∈L1[l1,l2], then the following inequality holds:
4δρδQ(l1+l22)≤Γ(δ)(l2−l1)ρδ[Jρ,δl+1Q(l2)eαl2+Jρ,δl−2Q(l1)eαl1] |
≤1ρ[B(ρ+1ρ,δ)+B(ρ+2ρ,δ)](Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2). | (5.1) |
Proof. Taking into account (3.3) and conducting product of (3.3) by (1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1 with ϑ∈(0,1),ρ>0 and then integrating the resulting estimate with respect to ϑ over [0,1], we find
4Q(l1+l22)∫10(1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1dϑ |
≤∫10(1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)eα(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
+∫10(1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)eα(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)dϑ |
=R1+R2. | (5.2) |
By making change of variable u=ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2, we have
R1=∫10(1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)eα(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=∫l1l2(1−(u−l2l1−l2)ρρ)δ−1(u−l2l1−l2)ρ−1Q(u)eαudul1−l2 |
=1(l2−l1)ρδ∫l2l1((l2−l1)ρ−(l2−u)ρρ)δ−1(l2−u)ρ−1Q(u)eαudu |
=Γ(δ(l2−l1)ρδJρ,δl−2Q(l1)eαl1. | (5.3) |
Substituting v=ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1, we have
R2=∫10(1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)eα(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)dϑ |
=∫l1l2(1−(v−l1l2−l1)ρρ)δ−1(v−l1l2−l1)ρ−1Q(v)eαvdul2−l1 |
=1(l2−l1)ρδ∫l2l1((l2−l1)ρ−(v−l1)ρρ)δ−1(v−l1)ρ−1Q(v)eαvdv |
=Γ(δ)(l2−l1)ρQJρ,δl−2Q(l2)eαl2. | (5.4) |
Thus by using (5.2) and (5.3) in (5.4), we get the first inequality of (5.1).
Consider
Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)≤ϑ(1−ϑ)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2) |
and
Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)≤ϑ(1−ϑ)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2). |
By adding
Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)+Q(ϑl2+(1−ϑ)l1)≤2ϑ(1−ϑ)(Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2). | (5.5) |
If we multiply (5.5) by (1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1 with ϑ∈(0,1),ρ>0 and then integrating the resulting estimate with respect to ϑ over [0,1], we get
Γ(δ)(l2−l1)ρδ[Jρ,δl+1Q(l2)eαl2+Jρ,δl−2Q(l1)eαl1] |
≤1ρ[B(ρ+1ρ,δ)+B(ρ+2ρ,δ)](Q(l1)eαl1+Q(l2)eαl2), | (5.6) |
the desired inequality is the right hand side of (5.1).
Our main results depend on the following identity.
Lemma 5.2. For ρ>0 and let Q:I⊂R→R be a differentiable function on (l1,l2) with l1<l2 such that Q′∈L1[l1,l2], then the following identity holds:
(Q(l1)+Q(l2)2)−ρδΓ(δ+1)2(l2−l1)ρδ[Jρ,δl+1Q(l2)+Jρ,δl+2Q(l1)] |
=(l2−l1)ρδ2∫10[(1−ϑρρ)δ−(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δ]Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ. | (5.7) |
Proof. It suffices that
∫10[(1−ϑρρ)δ−(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δ]Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=∫10(1−ϑρρ)δQ′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ−(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δQ′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=M1−M2. | (5.8) |
Using integration by parts and making change of variable technique, we have
M1=∫10(1−ϑρρ)δQ′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=1l1−l2(1−ϑρρ)δQ(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ|10 |
+δl1−l2∫10(1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=Q(l2)(l2−l1)ρδ−δl2−l1∫10(1−ϑρρ)δ−1ϑρ−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=Q(l2)(l2−l1)ρδ−δΓ(δ)(l2−l1)ρδ+1Jρ,δl−2Q(l1) |
Analogously
M2=∫10(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δQ′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=1l1−l2(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δQ(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)|10 |
−1l1−l2∫10Q(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δ−1(1−ϑ)ρ−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=−Q(l1)(l2−l1)ρδ+δl2−l1∫10(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δ−1(1−ϑ)ρ−1Q(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
=−Q(l1)(l2−l1)ρδ+δΓ(δ)(l2−l1)ρδ+1Jρ,δl+1Q(l2). | (5.9) |
By substituting values of M1 and M2 in (5.8) and then conducting product on both sides by (l2−l1)ρδ2, we get the desired result.
Theorem 5.3. For ρ>0 and let Q:I⊂R→R be a differentiable function on I∘ with l1<l2 such that Q′∈L1([l1,l2]). If | Q′|r, with r≥1, is an exponentially tgs-convex function, then the following inequality holds
|(Q(l1)+Q(l2)2)−ρδΓ(δ+1)2(l2−l1)ρδ[Jρ,δl+1Q(l2)+Jρ,δl+2Q(l1)]| |
≤(l2−l1)ρδ2(1ρδ+1B(1ρ,δ+1)+1ρδ+2B(1ρ2,δ+1))1−1r(eαrl2|Q′(l1)|r+eαrl1|Q′(l2)|r6eαrl1eαrl2)1r. | (5.10) |
Proof. Using exponentially tgs-convexity of | Q′|r, Lemma 5.2, and the well-known Hölder inequality, we have
|(Q(l1)+Q(l2)2)−ρδΓ(δ+1)2(l2−l1)ρδ[Jρ,δl+1Q(l2)+Jρ,δl+2Q(l1)]| |
=| (l2−l1)ρδ2∫10[(1−ϑρρ)δ−(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δ]Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)dϑ |
≤(l2−l1)ρδ2(∫10[(1−ϑρρ)δ−(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δ]dϑ)1−1r |
×(∫10| Q′(ϑl1+(1−ϑ)l2)|rdϑ)1r |
≤(l2−l1)ρδ2(∫10(1−ϑρρ)δdϑ−∫10(1−(1−ϑ)ρρ)δdϑ)1−1r |
×(∫10ϑ(1−ϑ)(| Q′(l1)|reαrl1+| Q′(l2)|reαrl2)dϑ)1r |
=(l2−l1)ρδ2(1ρδ+1B(1ρ,δ+1)+1ρδ+2B(1ρ2,δ+1))1−1r(eαrl2|Q′(l1)|r+eαrl1|Q′(l2)|r6eαrl1eαrl2)1r, |
the required result.
Let l1,l2>0 with l1≠l2. Then the arithmetic mean A(l1,l2), harmonic mean H(l1,l2), logarithmic mean L(l1,l2) and n-th generalized logarithmic mean Ln(l1,l2) are defined by
A(l1,l2)=l1+l22, |
G(l1,l2)=√l1l2, |
L(l1,l2)=l2−l1lnl2−lnl1 |
and
Ln(l1,l2)=[ln+12−ln+11(n+1)(l2−l1)]1n(n≠0,−1), |
respectively. Recently, the bivariate means have attracted the attention of many researchers [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58] due to their are closely related to the special functions.
In this section, we use our obtained results in section 5 to provide several novel inequalities involving the special bivariate means mentioned above.
Proposition 6.1. Let l1,l2>0 with l2>l1. Then
|A(l21,l22)−12L33(l1,l2)|≤l2−l1(6)1reα(l1+l2)[(eαl2l1)r+(eαl1l2)r]1r. |
Proof. Let ρ=δ=1 and Q(z)=z2. Then the desired result follows from Theorem 5.3.
Proposition 6.2. Let l1,l2>0 with l2>l1. Then
|H−1(l21,l22)−12L−1(l1,l2)|≤l2−l12(6)1reα(l1+l2)[(eαl2l22)r+(eαl1l21)r(l1l2)2r]1r. |
Proof. Let ρ=δ=1 and Q(z)=1z. Then the desired result follows from Theorem 5.3.
Proposition 6.3. Let l1,l2>0 with l2>l1. Then
|A(ln1,ln2)−12Lnn(l1,l2)|≤(l2−l1)|n|2[(eαl2ln−11)r+(eαl1ln−12)r6eαr(l1+l2)]1r. |
Proof. Let ρ=δ=1 and Q(z)=zn. Then the desired result follows from Theorem 5.3.
In this paper, we proposed a novel technique with two different approaches for deriving several generalizations for an exponentially tgs-convex function that accelerates with a conformable integral operator. We have generalized the Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially tgs-convex functions. By choosing different parametric values ρ and δ, we analyzed the convergence behavior of our proposed methods in form of corollaries. Another aspect is that to show the effectiveness of our novel generalizations, our results have potential applications in fractional integrodifferential and fractional Schrödinger equations. Numerical applications show that our findings are consistent and efficient. Finally, we remark that the framework of the conformable fractional integral operator, it is of interest to further our results to the framework of Riemann-Liouville, Hadamard and Katugampola fractional integral operators. Our ideas and the approach may lead to a lot of follow-up research.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions, which led to considerable improvement of the article.
The work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61673169, 11971142, 11701176, 11626101, 11601485).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
E. J. Anderson, P. Nash and A. F. Perold, Some properties of a class of continuous linear programs, SIAM J. Control Optim., 21 (1983), 758-765. doi: 10.1137/0321046
![]() |
[2] |
E. J. Anderson and A. B. Philpott, On the solutions of a class of continuous linear programs, SIAM J. Control Optimi., 32 (1994), 1289-1296. doi: 10.1137/S0363012992227216
![]() |
[3] |
E. J. Anderson and M. C. Pullan, Purification for separated continuous linear programs, Math. Methods Oper. Res., 43 (1996), 9-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01303432
![]() |
[4] | R. E. Bellman, Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957. |
[5] |
R. N. Buie and J. Abrham, Numerical solutions to continuous linear programming problems, Math. Methods Oper. Res., 17 (1973), 107-117. doi: 10.1007/BF01956855
![]() |
[6] |
W. H. Farr, M. A. Hanson, Continuous Time Programming with Nonlinear Constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 45 (1974), 96-115. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90124-3
![]() |
[7] |
W. H. Farr, M. A. Hanson, Continuous Time Programming with Nonlinear Time-Delayed Constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 46 (1974), 41-61. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90280-7
![]() |
[8] |
L. Fleischer and J. Sethuraman, Efficient algorithms for separated continuous linear programs: the multicommodity flow problem with holding costs and extensions, Math. Oper. Res., 30 (2005), 916-938. doi: 10.1287/moor.1050.0166
![]() |
[9] |
R. C. Grinold, Continuous Programming Part One: Linear Objectives, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 28 (1969), 32-51. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(69)90106-1
![]() |
[10] |
R. C. Grinold, Continuous Programming Part Two: Nonlinear Objectives, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 27 (1969), 639-655. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(69)90143-7
![]() |
[11] |
M. A. Hanson and B. Mond, A Class of Continuous Convex Programming Problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 22 (1968), 427-437. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(68)90184-4
![]() |
[12] |
N. Levinson, A class of continuous linear programming problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 16 (1966), 73-83. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(66)90187-9
![]() |
[13] |
R. Meidan and A. F. Perold, Optimality conditions and strong duality in abstract and continuoustime linear programming, J. Optimiz. Theory App., 40 (1983), 61-77. doi: 10.1007/BF00934631
![]() |
[14] |
S. Nobakhtian, M. R. Pouryayevali, Optimality Criteria for Nonsmooth Continuous-Time Problems of Multiobjective Optimization, J. Optimiz. Theory App., 136 (2008), 69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10957-007-9302-1
![]() |
[15] |
S. Nobakhtian, M. R. Pouryayevali, Duality for Nonsmooth Continuous-Time Problems of Vector Optimization, J. Optimiz. Theory App., 136 (2008), 77-85. doi: 10.1007/s10957-007-9301-2
![]() |
[16] |
N. S. Papageorgiou, A class of infinite dimensional linear programming problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 87 (1982), 228-245. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(82)90163-9
![]() |
[17] |
M. C. Pullan, An algorithm for a class of continuous linear programs, SIAM J. Control Optim., 31 (1993), 1558-1577. doi: 10.1137/0331073
![]() |
[18] |
M. C. Pullan, Forms of optimal solutions for separated continuous linear programs, SIAM J. Control Optim., 33 (1995), 1952-1977. doi: 10.1137/S0363012993247858
![]() |
[19] |
M.C. Pullan, A duality theory for separated continuous linear programs, SIAM J. Control Optim., 34 (1996), 931-965. doi: 10.1137/S0363012993257507
![]() |
[20] |
M. C. Pullan, Convergence of a general class of algorithms for separated continuous linear programs, SIAM J. Optimiz., 10 (2000), 722-731. doi: 10.1137/S1052623494278827
![]() |
[21] |
M. C. Pullan, An extended algorithm for separated continuous linear programs, Math. Program., 93 (2002), 415-451. doi: 10.1007/s10107-002-0307-0
![]() |
[22] |
T. W. Reiland, Optimality Conditions and Duality in Continuous Programming I: Convex Programs and a Theorem of the Alternative, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 77 (1980), 297-325. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(80)90278-4
![]() |
[23] |
T. W. Reiland, Optimality Conditions and Duality in Continuous Programming II: The Linear Problem Revisited, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 77 (1980), 329-343. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(80)90230-9
![]() |
[24] |
T. W. Reiland, M. A. Hanson, Generalized Kuhn-Tucker Conditions and Duality for Continuous Nonlinear Programming Problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 74 (1980), 578-598. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(80)90149-3
![]() |
[25] | F. Riesz and B. Sz.-Nagy, Functional Analysis, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1955. |
[26] |
M. A. Rojas-Medar, J. V. Brandao, G. N. Silva, Nonsmooth Continuous-Time Optimization Problems: Sufficient Conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 227 (1998), 305-318. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1998.6024
![]() |
[27] |
M. Schechter, Duality in continuous linear programming, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 37 (1972), 130-141. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(72)90262-4
![]() |
[28] |
E. Shindin, G. Weiss, Structure of Solutions for Continuous Linear Programs with Constant Coefficients, SIAM J. Optimiz., 25 (2015), 1276-1297. doi: 10.1137/140971725
![]() |
[29] |
C. Singh, A Sufficient Optimality Criterion in Continuous Time Programming for Generalized Convex Functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 62 (1978), 506-511. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(78)90143-9
![]() |
[30] |
C. Singh, W. H. Farr, Saddle-Point Optimality Criteria of Continuous Time Programming without Differentiability, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 59 (1977), 442-453. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(77)90072-5
![]() |
[31] | W. F. Tyndall, A duality theorem for a class of continuous linear programming problems, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 15 (1965), 644-666. |
[32] |
W. F. Tyndall, An extended duality theorem for continuous linear programming problems, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 15 (1967), 1294-1298. doi: 10.1137/0115112
![]() |
[33] |
X. Q. Wang, S. Zhang, D. D. Yao, Separated Continuous Conic Programming: Strong Duality and an Approximation Algorithm, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2009), 2118-2138. doi: 10.1137/060650532
![]() |
[34] |
G. Weiss, A simplex based algorithm to solve separated continuous linear programs, Math. Program., 115 (2008), 151-198. doi: 10.1007/s10107-008-0217-x
![]() |
[35] |
C.-F. Wen, H.-C. Wu, Using the Dinkelbach-Type Algorithm to Solve the Continuous-Time Linear Fractional Programming Problems, J. Global Optim., 49 (2011), 237-263. doi: 10.1007/s10898-010-9542-8
![]() |
[36] |
C.-F. Wen, H.-C. Wu, Using the Parametric Approach to Solve the Continuous-Time Linear Fractional Max-Min Problems, J. Global Optim., 54 (2012), 129-153. doi: 10.1007/s10898-011-9751-9
![]() |
[37] |
C.-F. Wen, H.-C. Wu, The Approximate Solutions and Duality Theorems for the Continuous-Time Linear Fractional Programming Problems, Numer. Func. Anal. Opt., 33 (2012), 80-129. doi: 10.1080/01630563.2011.629312
![]() |
[38] |
H.-C. Wu, Solving the Continuous-Time Linear Programming Problems Based on the Piecewise Continuous Functions, Numer. Func. Anal. Opt., 37 (2016), 1168-1201. doi: 10.1080/01630563.2016.1193517
![]() |
[39] | G. J. Zalmai, Duality for a Class of Continuous-Time Homogeneous Fractional Programming Problems, Zeitschrift für Operations Research, 30 (1986), A43-A48. |
[40] | G. J. Zalmai, Duality for a Class of Continuous-Time Fractional Programming Problems, Utilitas Mathematica, 31 (1987), 209-218. |
[41] | G. J. Zalmai, Optimality Conditions and Duality for a Class of Continuous-Time Generalized Fractional Programming Problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 153 (1990), 365-371. |
[42] |
G. J. Zalmai, Optimality Conditions and Duality models for a Class of Nonsmooth Constrained Fractional Optimal Control Problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 210 (1997), 114-149. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5377
![]() |
1. | Humaira Kalsoom, Muhammad Idrees, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Uzair Awan, Yu-Ming Chu, Some New (p1p2,q1q2)-Estimates of Ostrowski-type integral inequalities via n-polynomials s-type convexity, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7122, 10.3934/math.2020456 | |
2. | Thabet Abdeljawad, Saima Rashid, A. A. El-Deeb, Zakia Hammouch, Yu-Ming Chu, Certain new weighted estimates proposing generalized proportional fractional operator in another sense, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02935-z | |
3. | Thabet Abdeljawad, Saima Rashid, Zakia Hammouch, İmdat İşcan, Yu-Ming Chu, Some new Simpson-type inequalities for generalized p-convex function on fractal sets with applications, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02955-9 | |
4. | Shu-Bo Chen, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Rehana Ashraf, Yu-Ming Chu, A new approach on fractional calculus and probability density function, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7041, 10.3934/math.2020451 | |
5. | Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Saima Parveen, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Zakia Hammouch, New computations for extended weighted functionals within the Hilfer generalized proportional fractional integral operators, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 4507, 10.3934/math.2021267 | |
6. | Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu, New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6874, 10.3934/math.2020441 | |
7. | Tie-Hong Zhao, Zai-Yin He, Yu-Ming Chu, On some refinements for inequalities involving zero-balanced hypergeometric function, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6479, 10.3934/math.2020418 | |
8. | Shu-Bo Chen, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Zakia Hammouch, Yu-Ming Chu, New fractional approaches for n-polynomial P-convexity with applications in special function theory, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03000-5 | |
9. | Muhammad Uzair Awan, Sadia Talib, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Yu-Ming Chu, A new q-integral identity and estimation of its bounds involving generalized exponentially μ-preinvex functions, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03036-7 | |
10. | Shyam S. Santra, Omar Bazighifan, Hijaz Ahmad, Yu-Ming Chu, Fateh Mebarek-Oudina, Second-Order Differential Equation: Oscillation Theorems and Applications, 2020, 2020, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2020/8820066 | |
11. | Saad Ihsan Butt, Muhammad Umar, Saima Rashid, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Yu-Ming Chu, New Hermite–Jensen–Mercer-type inequalities via k-fractional integrals, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03093-y | |
12. | Imran Abbas Baloch, Aqeel Ahmad Mughal, Yu-Ming Chu, Absar Ul Haq, Manuel De La Sen, A variant of Jensen-type inequality and related results for harmonic convex functions, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6404, 10.3934/math.2020412 | |
13. | Artion Kashuri, Sajid Iqbal, Saad Ihsan Butt, Jamshed Nasir, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Thabet Abdeljawad, Basil K. Papadopoulos, Trapezium-Type Inequalities for k -Fractional Integral via New Exponential-Type Convexity and Their Applications, 2020, 2020, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2020/8672710 | |
14. | Maysaa Al Qurashi, Saima Rashid, Sobia Sultana, Hijaz Ahmad, Khaled A. Gepreel, New formulation for discrete dynamical type inequalities via h-discrete fractional operator pertaining to nonsingular kernel, 2021, 18, 1551-0018, 1794, 10.3934/mbe.2021093 | |
15. | Yu‐ming Chu, Saima Rashid, Jagdev Singh, A novel comprehensive analysis on generalized harmonically ψ ‐convex with respect to Raina's function on fractal set with applications , 2021, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.7346 | |
16. | Chahn Yong Jung, Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Yu-Pei Lv, Josip Pečarić, Refinements of some fractional integral inequalities for refined (α,h−m)-convex function, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-021-03544-0 | |
17. | Mubashir Qayyum, Efaza Ahmad, Sidra Afzal, Tanveer Sajid, Wasim Jamshed, Awad Musa, El Sayed M. Tag El Din, Amjad Iqbal, Fractional analysis of unsteady squeezing flow of Casson fluid via homotopy perturbation method, 2022, 12, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-022-23239-0 | |
18. | Saima Rashid, Aasma Khalid, Omar Bazighifan, Georgia Irina Oros, New Modifications of Integral Inequalities via ℘-Convexity Pertaining to Fractional Calculus and Their Applications, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 1753, 10.3390/math9151753 | |
19. | Ahmed A. El‐Deeb, Novel dynamic Hardy‐type inequalities on time scales, 2023, 46, 0170-4214, 5299, 10.1002/mma.8834 | |
20. | Ahmed A. El-Deeb, Dumitru Baleanu, Nehad Ali Shah, Ahmed Abdeldaim, On some dynamic inequalities of Hilbert's-type on time scales, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 3378, 10.3934/math.2023174 | |
21. | Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam, Mir Zaman, Fahd Jarad, Estimates for p-adic fractional integral operator and its commutators on p-adic Morrey–Herz spaces, 2022, 2022, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-022-02829-6 | |
22. | Wei Liu, Fangfang Shi, Guoju Ye, Dafang Zhao, Some inequalities for cr-log-h-convex functions, 2022, 2022, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-022-02900-2 | |
23. | JIAN-GEN LIU, XIAO-JUN YANG, YI-YING FENG, LU-LU GENG, ON THE GENERALIZED WEIGHTED CAPUTO-TYPE DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22500323 | |
24. | Waewta Luangboon, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Jessada Tariboon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Simpson- and Newton-Type Inequalities for Convex Functions via (p,q)-Calculus, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 1338, 10.3390/math9121338 | |
25. | Shasha Li, Ghulam Farid, Atiq Ur Rehman, Hafsa Yasmeen, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Fractional Versions of Hadamard-Type Inequalities for Strongly Exponentially α , h − m -Convex Functions, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/2555974 | |
26. | Ahmed A. El-Deeb, On dynamic inequalities in two independent variables on time scales and their applications for boundary value problems, 2022, 2022, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-022-01636-8 | |
27. | Artion Kashuri, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Muhammad Tariq, Ahmed A. Hamoud, Homan Emadifar, Faraidun K. Hamasalh, Nedal M. Mohammed, Masoumeh Khademi, Guotao Wang, Integral Inequalities of Integer and Fractional Orders for n –Polynomial Harmonically t g s –Convex Functions and Their Applications, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/2493944 | |
28. | MAYSAA AL-QURASHI, SAIMA RASHID, YELIZ KARACA, ZAKIA HAMMOUCH, DUMITRU BALEANU, YU-MING CHU, ACHIEVING MORE PRECISE BOUNDS BASED ON DOUBLE AND TRIPLE INTEGRAL AS PROPOSED BY GENERALIZED PROPORTIONAL FRACTIONAL OPERATORS IN THE HILFER SENSE, 2021, 29, 0218-348X, 2140027, 10.1142/S0218348X21400272 | |
29. | Saima Rashid, Zakia Hammouch, Rehana Ashraf, Yu-Ming Chu, New Computation of Unified Bounds via a More General Fractional Operator Using Generalized Mittag–Leffler Function in the Kernel, 2021, 126, 1526-1506, 359, 10.32604/cmes.2021.011782 | |
30. |
YunPeng Chang, LiangJuan Yu, LinQi Sun, HuangZhi Xia,
LlogL Type Estimates for Commutators of Fractional Integral Operators on the p-Adic Vector Space,
2024,
18,
1661-8254,
10.1007/s11785-024-01514-4
|
|
31. | Fangfang Shi, Guoju Ye, Wei Liu, Dafang Zhao, A class of nonconvex fuzzy optimization problems under granular differentiability concept, 2023, 211, 03784754, 430, 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.04.021 | |
32. | Amit Prakash, Vijay Verma, Dumitru Baleanu, Two Novel Methods for Fractional Nonlinear Whitham–Broer–Kaup Equations Arising in Shallow Water, 2023, 9, 2349-5103, 10.1007/s40819-023-01497-4 | |
33. | Umair Manzoor, Hassan Waqas, Taseer Muhammad, Hamzah Naeem, Ahmed Alshehri, Characteristics of hybrid nanofluid induced by curved surface with the consequences of thermal radiation: an entropy optimization, 2023, 1745-5030, 1, 10.1080/17455030.2023.2226251 |