Citation: Quting Chen, Yadong Shang. Direct similarity reductions and new exact solutions of the short pulse equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 231-241. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.231
[1] | Arnon Ploymukda, Pattrawut Chansangiam . Metric geometric means with arbitrary weights of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26153-26167. doi: 10.3934/math.20231333 |
[2] | Arnon Ploymukda, Kanjanaporn Tansri, Pattrawut Chansangiam . Weighted spectral geometric means and matrix equations of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11452-11467. doi: 10.3934/math.2024562 |
[3] | Tong Wu, Yong Wang . Super warped products with a semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10534-10553. doi: 10.3934/math.2022587 |
[4] | Yajun Xie, Changfeng Ma, Qingqing Zheng . On the nonlinear matrix equation Xs+AHF(X)A=Q. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18392-18407. doi: 10.3934/math.2023935 |
[5] | Wenxv Ding, Ying Li, Anli Wei, Zhihong Liu . Solving reduced biquaternion matrices equation k∑i=1AiXBi=C with special structure based on semi-tensor product of matrices. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3258-3276. doi: 10.3934/math.2022181 |
[6] | Mohd Danish Siddiqi, Meraj Ali Khan, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Khalid Masood . Geometrization of string cloud spacetime in general relativity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29042-29057. doi: 10.3934/math.20231487 |
[7] | Rajesh Kumar, Sameh Shenawy, Lalnunenga Colney, Nasser Bin Turki . Certain results on tangent bundle endowed with generalized Tanaka Webster connection (GTWC) on Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30364-30383. doi: 10.3934/math.20241465 |
[8] | Muhammad Asad Iqbal, Abid Ali, Ibtesam Alshammari, Cenap Ozel . Construction of new Lie group and its geometric properties. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6088-6108. doi: 10.3934/math.2024298 |
[9] | Yimeng Xi, Zhihong Liu, Ying Li, Ruyu Tao, Tao Wang . On the mixed solution of reduced biquaternion matrix equation n∑i=1AiXiBi=E with sub-matrix constraints and its application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27901-27923. doi: 10.3934/math.20231427 |
[10] | Fengxia Zhang, Ying Li, Jianli Zhao . The semi-tensor product method for special least squares solutions of the complex generalized Sylvester matrix equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5200-5215. doi: 10.3934/math.2023261 |
In classical matrix theory, the conventional matrix multiplication is a fundamental operation for processing of one/two-dimensional data. However, in modern data science, the conventional product is difficult to work with big or multidimensional data in order to extract information. In the early 2000s, Cheng [1] proposed the semi-tensor product (STP) of matrices as a tool for dealing with higher-dimensional data. The STP is a generalization of the conventional matrix multiplication, so that the multiplied matrices do not need to satisfy the matching-dimension condition. The symbol for this operation is ⋉. The STP keeps all fundamental properties of the conventional matrix multiplication. In addition, it possesses some incomparable advantages over the latter, such as interchangeability and complete compatibility. Due to these advantages, the STP is widely used in various fields, such as engineering [2], image encryption [3,4], Boolean networks [5,6], networked games [7,8], classical logic and fuzzy mathematics [9,10], finite state machines [11,12], finite systems [13] and others.
Matrix equations are fundamental tools in mathematics and they are applied in diverse fields. Recently, the theory of linear matrix equations with respect to the STP were investigated by many authors. Such theory includes necessary/sufficient conditions for existence and uniqueness of solutions (concerning ranks and linear independence) and methods to solve the matrix equations. The solutions of the matrix linear equation A⋉X=B were studied by Yao et al. [14]. Li et al. [15] investigated a system of two matrix equations A⋉X=B and X⋉C=D. Ji et al. [16] discussed the solvability of matrix equation A⋉X⋉B=C. Recently, the theory for the Sylvester equation A⋉X+X⋉B=C, the Lyapunov one A⋉X+X⋉AT=C and the Sylvester-transpose one A⋉X+XT⋉B=C was investigated in [17] and [18]. For nonlinear matrix equations, higher order algebraic equations can be applied widely in file encoding, file transmission and decoupling of logical networks. Wang et al. [19] investigated a nonlinear equation A⋉X⋉X=B.
Let Hn×n,PSn×n and Pn×n be the set of n×n Hermitian matrices, positive semidefinite matrices and positive definite matrices, respectively. This present research focuses on a famous nonlinear equation known as the Riccati equation:
XA−1X=B. | (1.1) |
In fact, this equation determines the solution of the linear-quadratic-Gaussian control problem which is one of the most fundamental problems in control theory, e.g., [20,21]. It is known that the metric geometric mean
A♯B=A1/2(A−1/2BA−1/2)1/2A1/2 | (1.2) |
is the unique positive solution of (1.1). This mean was introduced by Pusz and Woronowicz [22] and Ando [23] as the largest Hermitian matrix:
A♯B=max{X∈Hn×n:[AXXB]∈PS2n×2n}, |
where the maximal element is taken in the sense of the Löwner partial order. A significant property of the metric geometric mean is that A♯B is a midpoint of A and B for a natural Finsler metric. Many theoretical and computational research topics on the metric geometric mean have been widely studied, e.g., [24,25,26,27].
The metric geometric mean on PSn×n is a mean in Kubo-Ando's sense [28]:
(1) joint monotonicity: A⩽C and B⩽D implies A♯B⩽C♯D;
(2) transformer inequality: T(A♯B)T⩽(TAT)♯(TBT);
(3) joint continuity from above: Ak↓A and Bk↓B implies Ak♯Bk↓A♯B;
(4) normalization: In♯In=In.
Here, ⩽ is the Löwner partial order and Ak↓A indicates that (Ak) is a decreasing sequence converging to A.
There are another axiomatic approaches for means in various frameworks. Lawson and Lim [29,30] investigated a set of axioms for an algebraic system called a reflection quasigroup. The set Pn×n with an operation A∙B=AB−1A form a reflection quasigroup in the following sense:
(1) idempotency: A∙A=A;
(2) left distributivity: A∙(B∙C)=(A∙B)∙(A∙C);
(3) left symmetry: A∙(A∙B)=B;
(4) the equation X∙A=B has a unique solution X.
From the axiom 4, we have that A♯B is a unique solution of the Riccati equation XA−1X=B and call A♯B the mean or the midpoint of A and B.
In this present research, we investigate the Riccati equation with respect to the STP:
X⋉A−1⋉X=B, |
where A and B are given positive definite matrices of different sizes, and X is an unknown square matrix. We show that this equation has a unique positive definite solution, which is defined to be the metric geometric mean of A and B. Then, we extend this notion to the case of positive semidefinite matrices by a continuity argument. We establish fundamental properties of this mean. Moreover, we investigate certain equations and inequalities involving metric geometric means.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we setup basic notation and give basic results on STP and Kronecker products. Positive (semi) definiteness of matrices concerning semi-tensor products is also presented in this section. In Section 3, we define the metric geometric mean for positive definite matrices from the Riccati equation. In Section 4, we extend the notion of metric geometric mean to positive semidefinite matrices and provide fundamental properties of geometric means. In Section 5, we present matrix equations and inequalities of metric geometric mean involving cancellability, concavity and positive linear maps. We conclude the whole work in Section 6.
Throughout, let Cm×n be the set of m×n complex matrices. We consider the following subsets of Cm×n: Hn×n the n×n Hermitian matrices, GLn×n the n×n invertible matrices, PSn×n the n×n positive semidefinite matrices and Pn×n the n×n positive definite matrices. Define Cn=Cn×1, the set of n-dimensional complex vectors. For any A,B∈Hn×n, the Löwner partial order A⩾B means that A−B∈PSn×n, while the strict order A>B indicates that A−B∈Pn×n. A matrix pair (A,B)∈Cm×n×Cp×q is said to satisfy factor-dimension condition if n|p or p|n. In this case, we write A≻kB when n=kp and A≺kB when p=kn. Denote AT and A∗ the transpose and conjugate transpose of A, respectively. We denote the n×n identity matrix by In.
This subsection is a brief review on semi-tensor products and Kronecker products of matrices.
Definition 2.1. Let X∈C1,m and Y∈Cn. If X≻kY, we split X into X1,X2,…,Xn∈C1,k and define the STP of X and Y as
X⋉Y=n∑i=1yiXi∈C1,k. |
If X≺kY, we split Y into Y1,Y2,…,Ym∈Ck and define the STP of X and Y as
X⋉Y=m∑i=1xiYi∈Ck. |
From the STP between vectors, we define the STP between matrices as follows.
Definition 2.2. Let a pair (A,B)∈Cm×n×Cp×q satisfy the factor-dimensional condition. Then, we define the STP of A and B to be an m×q block matrix
A⋉B=[Ai⋉Bj]m,qi,j=1, |
where Ai is i-th row of A and Bj is the j-th column of B.
Lemma 2.1. (e.g., [31,32]) Let A∈Cm×n,B∈Cp×q,P∈Cm×m,Q∈Cn×n. Provided that all matrix operations are well-defined, we have
(1) the operation (A,B)↦A⋉B is bilinear and associative;
(2) (A⋉B)∗=B∗⋉A∗;
(3) if P∈GLm×m and Q∈GLn×n, then (P⋉Q)−1=Q−1⋉P−1;
(4) if P≺kQ, then det(P⋉Q)=(detP)k(detQ).
Recall that for any matrices A=[aij]∈Cm×n and B∈Cp×q, their Kronecker product is defined by
A⊗B=[aijB]∈Cmp,nq. |
Lemma 2.2. (e.g., [31,32]) Let A∈Cm×n and B∈Cp×q.
(1) If A≻kB then A⋉B=A(B⊗Ik).
(2) If A≺kB then A⋉B=(A⊗Ik)B.
Lemma 2.3. (e.g., [33]) Let A∈Cm×n,B∈Cp×q,P∈Cm×m and Q∈Cn×n. Then, we have
(1) the operation (A,B)↦A⊗B is bilinear and associative;
(2) (A⊗B)∗=A∗⊗B∗;
(3) rank(A⊗B)=rank(A)rank(B);
(4) A⊗B=0 if and only if either A=0 or B=0;
(5) if P∈GLm×m and Q∈GLn×n, then (P⊗Q)−1=P−1⊗Q−1;
(6) if P⩾0 and Q⩾0, then P⊗Q⩾0 and (P⊗Q)1/2=P1/2⊗Q1/2;
(7) if P>0 and Q>0, then P⊗Q>0;
(8) det(P⊗Q)=(detP)m(detQ)n.
In this subsection, we provide positive (semi) definiteness of matrices involving semi-tensor products.
Proposition 2.1. Let A∈PSn×n,B∈PSm×m,X∈Cm×m and S,T∈Hn×n. Provided that all matrix operations are well-defined, we have
(1) X∗⋉A⋉X⩾0;
(2) A⋉B⩾0 if and only if A⋉B=B⋉A;
(3) if S⩾T then X∗⋉S⋉X⩾X∗⋉T⋉X.
Proof. 1) Assume that A≺kX. Since (X∗⋉A⋉X)∗=X∗⋉A⋉X, we have that X∗⋉A⋉X is Hermitian. Let u∈Cm and set v=X⋉u. Using positive semidefiniteness of Kronecker products (Lemma 2.3), we obtain that A⊗Ik⩾0. Then, by Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2,
u∗(X∗⋉A⋉X)u=(X⋉u)∗⋉A⋉(X⋉u)=v∗(A⊗Ik)v⩾0. |
This implies that X∗⋉A⋉X⩾0. For the case A≻kX, the proof is similar to the case A≺kX.
2) Suppose that A≺kB. (⇒) Since A,B and A⋉B are Hermitian, we have by Lemma 1 that A⋉B=(A⋉B)∗=B∗⋉A∗=B⋉A.
(⇐) We know that B and B1/2 are commuting matrices. Since A⋉B=B⋉A, we get A⋉B1/2=B1/2⋉A. Thus, A⋉B=A⋉B1/2⋉B1/2=B1/2⋉A⋉B1/2. Using the assertion 1, A⋉B=B1/2⋉A⋉B1/2⩾0. For the case A≻kB, the proof is similar to the case A≺kB.
3) Since S⩾T, we have S−T⩾0. Applying the assertion 1, we get X∗⋉(S−T)⋉X⩾0, i.e., X∗⋉S⋉X⩾X∗⋉T⋉X.
Proposition 2.2. Let A∈Pn×n,B∈Pm×m,X∈Cp×q,Y∈GLp×p and S,T∈Hn×n. Provided that all matrix operations are well-defined, we have:
(1) If rankX=q then X∗⋉A⋉X>0.
(2) Y∗⋉A⋉Y>0.
(3) A⋉B>0 if and only if A⋉B=B⋉A.
(4) If S>T then Y∗⋉S⋉Y>Y∗⋉T⋉Y.
Proof. 1) Suppose A≺kX and rankX=q. Applying Lemma 2.1, X∗⋉A⋉X∈Hq×q. Let u∈Cq−{0}. Set v=X⋉u. Since rankX=q, we have v≠0. Since A⊗Ik>0 (Lemma 2.1), we obtain
u∗(X∗⋉A⋉X)u=v∗⋉A⋉v=v∗(A⊗Ik)v>0. |
Thus, X∗⋉A⋉X>0. For the case A≻kX, we have by Lemma 2.1 that X∗⋉A⋉X∈Hkq×kq. Since rankX=q, we get by Lemma 2.3 that rank(X⊗Ik)=kq. Thus, v=(X⊗Ikq)u≠0. Since A>0 and v≠0, we obtain u∗(X∗⋉A⋉X)u=v∗Av>0, i.e., X∗⋉A⋉X is positive definite.
2) Since Y is invertible, we have rankY=p. Using the assertion 1, Y∗⋉A⋉Y>0.
3)–4). The proof is similar to Proposition 2.1.
In this section, we define the metric geometric mean of two positive definite matrices when the two matrices satisfy factor-dimension condition, as a solution of the Riccati equation. Our results include the conventional metric geometric means of matrices as special case.
Definition 3.1. Let m,n,k∈N be such that m=nk. We define a binary operation
∙:Pm×m×Pm×m→Pm×m,(X,Y)↦XY−1X, |
and define an external binary operation
∗:Pm×m×Pn×n→Pm×m,(X,Y)↦X⋉Y−1⋉X. |
For convenience, we write ∙ and ∗ to the same notation ∙.
Proposition 3.1. Let m,n,k∈N be such that m=nk. Then,
(1) A∙A=A;
(2) α(A∙B)=(αA)∙(αB) for all α>0;
(3) A∙(A∙B)=B⊗Ik;
(4) (A∙B)−1=A−1∙B−1;
(5) A∙(B∙C)=(A∙B)∙(A∙C);
(6) if A⩽B then T∙A⩾T∙B for all T∈Pm×m.
Proof. The proof is immediate.
Theorem 3.2. Let A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m be such that A≺kB. Then, the Riccati equation X∙A=B has a unique solution X∈Pm×m.
Proof. Set X=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2. Since B⩾0 and A∈GLn×n, we have by Proposition 2.2 that A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2>0. Thus, (A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2>0. Using Proposition 2.2 again, we obtain
X=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2>0. |
Applying Lemma 2.1, we get
X∙A=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉In⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2=B. |
Thus, A♯B:=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2 is a solution of X∙A=B. Suppose that Y∈Pm×m satisfying X∙X=B=Y∙A. Consider
(A−1/2⋉X⋉A−1/2)2=A−1/2⋉(X∙A)⋉A−1/2=A−1/2⋉(Y∙A)⋉A−1/2=(A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2)2. |
From the uniqueness of positive-definite square root, we get A−1/2⋉X⋉A−1/2=A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2. Thus,
X=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉X⋉A−1/2)⋉A1/2=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2)⋉A1/2=Y. |
For the special case m=n of Theorem 3.2, the Riccati equation A≺kB is reduced to XA−1X=B which has been already studied by many authors. e.g., [22], [25], [34].
Definition 3.3. Let A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m be such that A≺kB. The metric geometric mean of A and B is defined to be
A♯B=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2. | (3.1) |
Kubo and Ando [28] provided a significant theory of operator means: given an operator monotone function on (0,∞) such that f(1)=1, the operator mean mf is defined by
AmfB=A1/2f(A−1/2BA−1/2)A1/2. |
For the metric geometric mean, we can write
A♯B=A1/2⋉f(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)⋉A1/2, |
where f=√x, A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m with A≺kB.
Lemma 3.1. (Löwner-Heinz inequality, e.g., [35]) Let S,T∈PSn×n. If S⩽T then S1/2⩽T1/2.
The following theorem gives necessity and sufficiency condition for the Riccati inequality.
Theorem 3.4. Let A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m be such that A≺kB. Let X∈Hm×m. Then, X⩽A♯B if and only if there exists Y∈Hm×m such that X⩽Y and Y∙A⩽B.
Proof. Suppose X⩽A♯B. Set Y=A♯B. We have, by Theorem 3.2, Y∙A=B and Y⩾X. Conversely, suppose that there exists Y∈Hm×m such that X⩽Y and Y∙A⩽B. By Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.1, we have
A−1/2⋉Y⋉A−1/2=(A−1/2⋉(Y∙A)⋉A−1/2)1/2⩽(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2. |
Using Proposition 2.1, we obtain
X⩽Y⩽A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2=A♯B. |
From Theorem 3.4, we obtain that A♯B is the largest (in the Löwner order) solution of the Riccati inequality Y∙A⩽B.
In this section, the expression Ak→A means that the matrix sequence (Ak)k∈N converges to the matrix A. For any sequence (Ak)k∈N in Hn×n, we write Ak↓A indicates that (Ak) is a decreasing sequence (with respect to the Löwner partial order) and Ak→A.
Lemma 4.1. Let m=nk. Then, the operation ♯:Pn×n×Pm×m→Pm×m is jointly monotone. Moreover, for any sequences (Ak)k∈N∈Pn×n and (Bk)k∈N∈Pm×m such that Ak↓A and Bk↓B, the sequence (Ak♯Bk)k∈N has a common limit, namely, A♯B.
Proof. First, let A1,A2∈Pn×n and B1,B2∈Pm×m. Suppose A1⩽A2 and B1⩽B2. By Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 3.2, we have
(A1♯B1)∙A2⩽(A1♯B1)∙A1=B1⩽B2. |
Since A1♯B1 satisfies the Riccati inequality X∙A2⩽B2, we obtain A1♯B1⩽A2♯B2 by Theorem 3.4. Next, let (Ak)k∈N and (Bk)k∈N be sequences in Pn×n and Pm×m, respectively. Assume that Ak↓A and Bk↓B. Using the monotonicity of the metric geometric mean, we conclude that the sequence (Ak♯Bk) is decreasing. In addition, it is bounded below by the zero matrix. The order completeness (with respect to the Löwner partial order) of Cn×n implies that Ak♯Bk converges to a positive definite matrix. Recall that the matrix multiplication is continuous. It follows from Lemma 2.2 that A−1/2k⋉Bk⋉A−1/2k converges to A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2 in Frobenius norm (or another norm). By Löwner-Heinz inequality (Lemma 3.1), we obtain
A1/2k⋉(A−1/2k⋉Bk⋉A−1/2k)1/2⋉A1/2k→A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2, |
i.e., Ak♯Bk→A♯B.
It is natural to extend the metric geometric mean of positive definite matrices to positive semidefinite matrices by taking limits.
Definition 4.1. Let A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m be such that A≺kB. We define the metric geometric mean of A and B to be
A♯B=limε→0+(A+εIn)♯(B+εIm). | (4.1) |
We see that A+εIn and B+εIm are decreasing sequences where ε↓0+. Since A+εIn↓A and B+εIm↓B, we obtain by Lemma 4.1 that the limit (4.1) is well-defined. Fundamental properties of metric geometric means are as follows.
Theorem 4.2. Let A,C∈PSn×n and B,D∈PSm×m with A≺kB.
(1) Positivity: A♯B⩾0.
(2) Fixed-point property: A♯A=A.
(3) Positive homogeneity: α(A♯B)=(αA)♯(αB) for all α⩾0.
(4) Congruent invariance: T∗⋉(A♯B)⋉T=(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T) for all T∈GLm×m.
(5) Self duality: (A♯B)−1=A−1♯B−1.
(6) Permutation invariance: A♯B=B♯(A⊗Ik).
(7) Consistency with scalars: If A⊗Ik and B commute, then A♯B=A1/2⋉B1/2.
(8) Monotonicity: If A⩽C and B⩽D, then A♯B⩽C♯D.
(9) Concavity: the map (A,B)↦A♯B is concave.
(10) Continuity from above: If Ak↓A and Bk↓B then Ak♯Bk↓A♯B.
(11) Betweenness: If A⊗Ik⩽B, then A⊗Ik⩽A♯B⩽B.
(12) Determinantal identity: det(A♯B)=√(detA)kdetB.
Proof. By continuity, we may assume that A,C∈Pn×n and B,D∈Pm×m. It is clear that (1) holds.
(2) Since A∙A=A, we have by Theorem 3.2 that A♯A=A.
(3) For α=0, we have α(A♯B)=0=(αA)♯(αB). Let α>0 and X=A♯B. Since
(αX)∙(αA)=α(X∙A)=αB, |
we have by Theorem 3.2 that αX=(αA)♯(αB), i.e., α(A♯B)=(αA)♯(αB).
(4) Let T∈GLm×m and X=A♯B. Applying Lemma 2.1, we have
(T∗⋉X⋉T)∙(T∗⋉A⋉T)=T∗⋉(X∙A)⋉T=T∗⋉B⋉T. |
This implies that T∗⋉X⋉T=(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T). Hence, T∗⋉(A♯B)⋉T=(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T).
(5) Let X=A♯B. Applying Theorem 3.2, we have X−1∙A−1=B−1. This implies that X−1=A−1♯B−1, i.e., (A♯B)−1=A−1♯B−1.
(6) Using Lemma 2.2 and Theorem 3.2, we have
X−1∙B−1=X−1∙(X∙A)−1=X−1∙(X−1∙A−1)=A−1⊗Ik. |
It follows that X−1=B♯(A−1⊗Ik), i.e., (A♯B)−1=B−1♯(A−1⊗Ik). Using (5), we get A−1♯B−1=B−1♯(A−1⊗Ik). By replacing A−1 and B−1 by A and B, respectively, we obtain A♯B=B♯(A⊗Ik).
(7) Since A⊗Ik and B commute, we have that A1/2⋉B1/2=B1/2⋉A1/2. Then,
(A1/2⋉B1/2)∙A=B1/2⋉A1/2⋉A−1⋉A1/2⋉B1/2=B. |
This implies that A♯B=A1/2⋉B1/2.
(8) Follows from Lemma 4.1.
(9) Let λ∈[0,1]. Since (A♯B)∙B=A⊗Ik and (C♯D)∙D=C⊗Ik, we have
[A⊗IkA♯BA♯BB]⩾0 and [C⊗IkC♯DC♯DD]⩾0. |
Then,
0⩽λ[A⊗IkA♯BA♯BB]+(1−λ)[C⊗IkC♯DC♯DD]=[[λA+(1−λ)C]⊗IkλA♯B+(1−λ)C♯DλA♯B+(1−λ)C♯DλB+(1−λ)D]. |
We have
[λA+(1−λ)C]⊗Ik⩾[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D][λB+(1−λ)D)]−1[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D] |
and then
[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA+(1−λ)C]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⩾{[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2}2. |
It follows that
{[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA+(1−λ)C]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2}1/2⩾[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2⋉[λA♯B+(1−λ)C♯D]⋉[(λB+(1−λ)D)]−1/2. |
Thus, [λA+(1−λ)C]♯[λB+(1−λ)D]⩾λ(A♯C)+(1−λ)(C♯D).
(10) Follows from Lemma 4.1.
(11) Let A⊗Ik⩽B. By applying the monotonicity of metric geometric mean, we have
A⊗Ik=A♯(A⊗Ik)⩽A♯B⩽B♯B=B. |
(12) The determinantal identity follows directly from Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3.
Properties 2, 4, 8 and 10 illustrate that the metric geometric mean (4.1) is a mean in Kubo-Ando's sense. In addition, this mean possesses self-duality and concavity (properties 5 and 9). The following proposition gives another ways of expressing the metric geometric mean.
Proposition 4.1. Let A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m with A≺kB.
(1) There exists a unitary matrix U∈Cm×m such that
A♯B=A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2. |
(2) If all eigenvalues of A−1⋉B are positive,
A♯B=A⋉(A−1⋉B)1/2=(A⋉B−1)1/2⋉B. |
Proof. By continuity, we may assume that A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m.
(1) Set U=(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2⋉B−1/2. Since U∗U=Im and UU∗=Im, we have that U is unitary and
A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2=A1/2⋉(A−1/2⋉B⋉A−1/2)1/2⋉A1/2=A♯B. |
(2) Assume that all eigenvalues of A−1⋉B are positive. Recall that if matrix X has positive eigenvalues, it has a unique square root. Since (A⋉(A−1⋉B)1/2)∙A=B, we have by Theorem 3.2 that A♯B=A⋉(A−1⋉B)1/2. Similarly, A♯B=(A⋉B−1)1/2⋉B.
Let (V,⟨⋅,⋅⟩) be an inner product space. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality states that for any x,y∈V,
|⟨x,y⟩|2⩽⟨x,x⟩⟨y,y⟩. | (4.2) |
Corollary 4.1. Let A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m with A≺kB. Then, for any x,y∈Cm,
|⟨(A♯B)x,y⟩|⩽√⟨(A⊗Ik)x,x⟩⟨By,y⟩. |
Proof. From Proposition 4.1(1), we can write A♯B=A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2 for some unitary U∈Cm×m. By applying Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (4.2), we get
|⟨(A♯B)x,y⟩|2=|⟨(A♯B)y,x⟩|2=|⟨(A1/2⋉U⋉B1/2)y,x⟩|2=|⟨UB1/2y,(A1/2⊗Ik)x⟩|2⩽⟨UB1/2y,UB1/2y⟩⟨(A⊗Ik)1/2x,(A⊗Ik)1/2x⟩=⟨(A⊗Ik)x,x⟩⟨By,y⟩. |
In this section, we investigate matrix equations and inequalities concerning metric geometric means.
Theorem 5.1. Let A,X1,X2∈PSn×n and B,Y1,Y2∈PSm×m be such that A≺kB.
(1) (left cancellability) If A♯Y1=A♯Y2 then Y1=Y2.
(2) (right cancellability) If X1♯B=X2♯B then X1=X2.
Proof. (1) Assume that A♯Y1=A♯Y2. We have
(A−1/2⋉Y1⋉A−1/2)1/2=(A−1/2⋉Y2⋉A−1/2)1/2. |
This implies that A−1/2⋉Y1⋉A−1/2=A−1/2⋉Y2⋉A−1/2. Applying Proposition 2.1(3), we get Y1=Y2.
(2) Suppose that X1♯B=X2♯B. We have by Theorem 4.2(6) that B♯(X1⊗Ik)=B♯(X2⊗Ik). Using the assertion 1, we get X⊗Ik=X2⊗Ik. Since (X−Y)⊗Ik=X⊗Ik−Y⊗Ik=0, we get by Lemma 2.3 that X=Y.
Theorem 5.1 shows that the metric geometric mean is cancellable, i.e., it is both left and right cancellable.
A map Ψ:Cn×n→Cm×m is called a positive linear map if it is linear and Ψ(X)∈PSm×m whenever X∈PSn×n. In addition, it said to be normalized if Ψ(In)=Im.
Lemma 5.1. (e.g., [36]) If Ψ:Cn×n→Cm×m is a normalized positive linear map then for all X∈PSn×n,
Ψ(X)2⩽Ψ(X2). |
Proposition 5.1. Let Φ:Cm×m→Cp×p be a positive linear map. Then, for any A∈PSn×n and B∈PSm×m such that A≺kB, we have
Φ(A♯B)⩽Φ(A⊗Ik)♯Φ(B). |
Proof. By continuity, we may assume that A∈Pn×n and B∈Pm×m. Consider the map Φ:Cm×m→Cp×p defined by
Φ(X):=Ψ(B)−1/2∙Ψ(B1/2∙X). |
We see that Φ is a normalized positive linear map. By Lemmas 3.1 and 5.1, we get Φ(X1/2)⩽Φ(X)1/2. Thus,
Φ((B−1/2∙A)1/2)⩽Φ(B−1/2∙A)1/2, |
i.e.,
Ψ(B)1/2∙Ψ(B1/2∙(B−1/2∙A)1/2)⩽(Ψ(B)1/2∙Ψ(A⊗Ik))1/2. |
It follows that Ψ(A♯B)=Ψ(B♯(A⊗Ik))⩽Ψ(B)♯Ψ(A⊗Ik)=Ψ(A⊗Ik)♯Ψ(B).
For the special map ΦT(X)=T∗XT, where T∈Cm×m, the result of Proposition 5.1 reduces to the transformer inequality T∗⋉(A♯B)⋉T⩽(T∗⋉A⋉T)♯(T∗⋉B⋉T).
A map Ψ:Cm×m×Cn×n→Cp×p is said to be concave if for any A,C∈Cm×m,B,D∈Cn×n and λ∈[0,1],
Ψ(λA+(1−λ)C),λB+(1−λ)D))⩾λΨ(A,B)+(1−λ)Ψ(C,D). |
Proposition 5.2. Let Ψ1:PSm×m→PSn×n and Ψ2:PSp×p→PSq×q be concave maps with n∣q. Then, the map (A,B)↦Ψ1(A)♯Ψ2(B) is concave.
Proof. Let A,C∈PSm×m,B,D∈PSp×p and λ∈[0,1]. Since Ψ1 and Ψ2 are concave, we have
Ψ1(λA+(1−λ)C)⩾λΨ1(A)+(1−λ)Ψ2(C) and Ψ2(λB+(1−λ)D)⩾λΨ2(B)+(1−λ)Ψ2(D). |
Applying concavity and monotonicity of the metric geometric mean (Theorem 4.2), we obtain
Ψ1(λA+(1−λ)C)♯Ψ2(λB+(1−λ)D)⩾[λΨ1(A)+(1−λ)Φ(C)]♯[λΨ2(B)+(1−λ)Ψ(D)]⩾λΨ1(A)♯Ψ2(B)+(1−λ)Ψ1(C)♯Ψ2(D). |
This shows the concavity of the map (A,B)↦Ψ1(A)♯Ψ2(B).
Corollary 5.1. (Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality) For each i=1,2,…,N, let Ai∈PSn×n and Bi∈PSm×m be such that Ai≺kBi. Then
N∑i=1(A2i♯B2i)⩽(N∑i=1A2i)♯(N∑i=1B2i). | (5.1) |
Proof. By using the concavity of metric geometric mean (Theorem 4.2(9)), we have
2∑i=1(Ai♯Bi)⩽(2∑i=1Ai)♯(2∑i=1Bi). |
By mathematical induction, we obtain
N∑i=1(Ai♯Bi)⩽(N∑i=1Ai)♯(N∑i=1Bi). | (5.2) |
Replacing Ai and Bi by A2i and B2i, respectively, in (5.2), we arrive the desire result.
We investigate the Riccati matrix equation X⋉A−1⋉X=B, where the operation ⋉ stands for the semi-tensor product. When A and B are positive definite matrices satisfying the factor-dimension condition, this equation has a unique positive solution, which is defined to be the metric geometric mean of A and B. We discuss that the metric geometric mean is the maximum solution of the Riccati inequality. By continuity of the metric geometric mean, we extend the notion of this mean to positive semidefinite matrices. We establish several properties of the metric geometric mean such as positivity, concavity, self-duality, congruence invariance, permutation invariance, betweenness and determinantal identity. In addition, this mean is a mean in the Kubo-Ando sense. Moreover, we investigate several matrix equations and inequalities concerning metric geometric means, concavity, cancellability, positive linear map and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Our results include the conventional metric geometric means of matrices as special case.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This research is supported by postdoctoral fellowship of School of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. The authors wish to express their thanks to the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript, giving valuable comments and helpful suggestions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
T. Schäfer, C. E. Wayne, Propagation of ultra-short optical pulses in cubic nonlinear media, Physica D, 196 (2004), 90-105. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2004.04.007
![]() |
[2] |
Y. Chung, C. K. R. T. Jones, T. Schäfer, et al. Ultra-short pulses in linear and nonlinear media, Nonlinearity, 18 (2005), 1351-1374. doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/18/3/021
![]() |
[3] |
M. L. Robelo, On equations which describe pseudospherical surfaces, Stud. Appl. Math., 81 (1989), 221-248. doi: 10.1002/sapm1989813221
![]() |
[4] |
R. Beals, M. Rabelo, K. Tenenblat, Bäcklund transformations and inverse scattering solutions for some pseudospherical surface equations, Stud. Appl. Math., 81 (1989), 125-151. doi: 10.1002/sapm1989812125
![]() |
[5] |
A. Sakovich, S. Sakovich, The short pulse equation is integrable, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 74 (2005), 239-241. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.74.239
![]() |
[6] | A. Sakovich, S. Sakovich, Solitary wave solutions of the short pulse equation, J. Phys. A, 39 (2006), L361-L367. |
[7] |
E. J. Parkes, A note on loop-soliton solutions of the short pulse equation, Phys. Lett. A, 374 (2010), 4321-4323. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.08.061
![]() |
[8] |
E. J. Parkes, Some periodic and solitary traveling-wave solutions of the short-pulse equation, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 38 (2008), 154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.10.055
![]() |
[9] |
H. Z. Liu, J. B. Li, Lie symmetry analysis and exact solutions for the short pulse equation, Nonlinear Anal. Theor., 71 (2009), 2126-2133. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.075
![]() |
[10] |
K. Fakhar, G. W. Wang, A. H. Kara, Symmetry reductions and conservation laws of the short pulse equation, Optik, 127 (2016), 10201-10207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.013
![]() |
[11] | S. L. Xie, X. C. Hong, B. Gao, The periodic traveling-wave solutions of the short-pulse equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 2542-2548. |
[12] | Y. Matsuno, Multiloop soliton and multibreather solutions of the short pulse model equation, J. Phy. Soc. Jpn., 76 (2007), 084003. |
[13] | Y. Matsuno, Periodic solutions of the short pulse model equation, J. Math. Phys., 49 (2008), 073508. |
[14] |
Y. L. Ma, B. Q. Li, Some new Jacobi elliptic function solutions for the short-pulse equation via a direct symbolic computation method, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 40 (2012), 683-690. doi: 10.1007/s12190-012-0565-9
![]() |
[15] |
B. F. Feng, Complex short pulse and coupled complex short pulse equations, Physica D, 297 (2015), 62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2014.12.002
![]() |
[16] | B. F. Feng, L. M. Ling, Z. N. Zhu, Defocusing complex short-pulse equation and its multi-dark-soliton solution, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 052227. |
[17] |
L. M. Ling, B. F. Feng, Z. N. Zhu, Multi-soliton, multi-breather and higher order rogue wave solutions to the complex short pulse equation, Physica D, 327 (2016), 13-29. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2016.03.012
![]() |
[18] |
S. Sakovich, Transformation and integrability of a generalized short pulse equation, Comm. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 39 (2016), 21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.02.031
![]() |
[19] |
S. F. Shen, B. F. Feng, Y. Ohta, From the real and complex coupled dispersionless equations to the real and complex short pulse equations, Stud. Appl. Math., 136 (2016), 64-88. doi: 10.1111/sapm.12092
![]() |
[20] |
S. F. Shen, B. F. Feng, Y. Ohta, A modified complex short pulse equation of defocusing type, J. Nonlinear Math. Phy., 24 (2017), 195-209. doi: 10.1080/14029251.2017.1306946
![]() |
[21] |
Q. L. Zha, The interaction solitons for the complex short pulse equation, Comm. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 47 (2017), 379-393. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.12.007
![]() |
[22] |
R. K. Gupta, V. Kumar, R. Jiwari, Exact and numerical solutions of coupled short pulse equation with time-dependent coefficients, Nonlinear Dyn., 79 (2015), 455-464. doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1678-5
![]() |
[23] | B. F. Feng, K. I. Maruno, Y. Ohta, Integrable discretizations of the short pulse equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43 (2010), 085203. |
[24] | J. C. Brunelli, The short pulse hierarchy, J. Math. Phys., 46 (2005), 123507. |
[25] |
H. Z. Liu, J. B. Li, L. Liu, Complete group classification and exact solutions to the extended short pulse equation, Int. J. Nonlin. Mechs., 47 (2012), 694-698. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.11.006
![]() |
[26] |
W. G. Rui, Different kinds of exact solutions with two-loop character of the two-component short pulse equations of the first kind, Comm. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 18 (2013), 2667-2678. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.01.020
![]() |
[27] | B. F. Feng, An integrable coupled short pulse equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 45 (2012), 1262-1275. |
[28] | V. Kumar, R. K. Gupta, R. Jiwari, Comparative study of travelling wave and numerical solutions for the coupled short pulse (CSP) equation, Chin. Phys. B, 22 (2013), 050201. |
[29] |
B. Q. Li, Y. L. Ma, Periodic solutions and solitons to two complex short pulse (CSP) equations in optical fiber, Optik, 144 (2017), 149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.114
![]() |
[30] | Z. Popowicz, Lax representations for matrix short pulse equations, J. Math. Phys., 58 (2017), 103506. |
[31] | A. N. W. Hone, V. Novikov, J. P. Wang, Generalizations of the short pulse equation, Lett. Math. Phys., 108 (2018), 927-947. |
[32] |
P. A. Clarkson, M. D. Kruskal, New similarity reductions of the Boussinesq equation, J. Math. Phys., 30 (1989), 2201-2213. doi: 10.1063/1.528613
![]() |
[33] |
P. A. Clarkson, New similarity solutions for the modified Boussinesq equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 22 (1989), 2355-2367. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/22/13/029
![]() |
[34] |
S. Y. Lou, A note on the new similarity reductions of the Boussinesq equation, Phys. Lett. A, 151 (1990), 133-135. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(90)90178-Q
![]() |
[35] |
C. Z. Qu, F. M. Mahomed, An extension of the direct method via an application, Quaest. Math., 24 (2001), 111-122. doi: 10.1080/16073606.2001.9639778
![]() |
[36] |
D. J. Arrigo, P. Broadbridge, J.M. Hill, Nonclassical symmetry solutions and the methods of Bluman-Cole and Clarkson-Kruskal, J. Math. Phys., 34 (1993), 4692-4703. doi: 10.1063/1.530365
![]() |
[37] |
B. M. Vaganan, R. Asokan, Direct similarity analysis of generalized Burgers equations and perturbation solutions of Euler-Painlevé transcendents, Stud. Appl. Math., 111 (2003), 435-451. doi: 10.1111/1467-9590.t01-1-00041
![]() |
[38] |
M. C. Nucci, P. A. Clarkson, The nonclassical method is more general than the direct method for symmetry reductions. An example of the Fitzhugh-Nagumo equation, Phys. Lett. A, 164 (1992), 49-56. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(92)90904-Z
![]() |
1. | Arnon Ploymukda, Kanjanaporn Tansri, Pattrawut Chansangiam, Weighted spectral geometric means and matrix equations of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 11452, 10.3934/math.2024562 | |
2. | Arnon Ploymukda, Pattrawut Chansangiam, Metric geometric means with arbitrary weights of positive definite matrices involving semi-tensor products, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 26153, 10.3934/math.20231333 |